Re: [rules-users] Without salience
If it works with salience, why change ? And why is the order so important ? Still trying to get the first occurence of an event of a given type/value ? It remembers me some not-so-old post ... - Mail original - De: salt writemesaltwo...@gmail.com À: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Envoyé: Mardi 4 Septembre 2012 06:17:16 Objet: [rules-users] Without salience Hi All, For the below use case i have implemented the rule. Please suggest other way of doing without salience. scenario ITEMS AMOUNT OCCNO PASS 10 1 FAIL 10 2 PASS 15 3 PASS 25 4 rule HelloWorld_14 salience (65522- $list.indexOf( $transdet1 )) when $p1:Passes($list : transaction) $trans1:Transaction(items in (PASS)) from $list $p2:Passes() not(exists($transdet5:Transaction(items in (FAIL),value==$transdet1.getVaue(), occno$trans1.getOccno()) from $p2.transaction)) then System.out.println($trans1.getOccno()); end The above will return 3 4 (not 4,3) Kindly suggest other way of doing this without salience. Thanks Salt -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Without-salience-tp4019565.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Without salience
The rule is very peculiar, and I'm not sure what you want to find with it. See below. On 04/09/2012, salt writemesaltwo...@gmail.com wrote: rule HelloWorld_14 salience (65522- $list.indexOf( $transdet1 )) when $p1:Passes($list : transaction) $trans1:Transaction(items in (PASS)) from $list $p2:Passes() not(exists($transdet5:Transaction(items in (FAIL),value==$transdet1.getVaue(), occno$trans1.getOccno()) from $p2.transaction)) Why are you using the complex in operator when you test against a single String value? I suppose getVaue() contains a typo. There is an unbound variable $transdet1. The 3rd and 4th conditional elements match another Passes fact, which could be the one bound to $p1 - or not. If you mean that $p1 == $p2, simply omit the second CE with Passes and use $p1. Don't use different accesses for the same thing (i.e., $list vs. $p1.transation) as this is confusing. -W then System.out.println($trans1.getOccno()); end The above will return 3 4 (not 4,3) Kindly suggest other way of doing this without salience. Thanks Salt -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Without-salience-tp4019565.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] 2nd CFP Semantic Web Applications and Tools for the Life Sciences (SWAT4LS 2012)
2nd Call for Papers - Submission Deadline in 3 Weeks 5th International Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for the Life Sciences (SWAT4LS 2012) http://www.swat4ls.org/workshops/paris2012 NEWS Submission system has been opened - submission deadline in 3 weeks! http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=swat4ls2012 First program structure, keynotes tutorials announced http://www.swat4ls.org/workshops/paris2012/scientific-programme/ Overview Since 2008, SWAT4LS is a workshop that has provided a platform for the presentation and discussion of the benefits and limits of applying web-based information systems and semantic technologies in the domains of health care and life sciences. SWAT4LS has been in Edinburgh (2008), Amsterdam (2009), Berlin (2010) and London (2011). Growing steadily each year as Semantic Web applications have become more widespread, the program of SWAT4LS has grown to include associated events. The next edition of SWAT4LS will be held in Paris, on November 30th 2012, and it will be preceded by two days of tutorials and hackathons. We are confident that the next edition of SWAT4LS will provide the same open and stimulating environment that brought together researchers, developers, and users, from various fields including biomedical informatics, systems biology, computational biology, drug discovery, bioinformatics and biocomputing, to discuss goals, current limits and real experiences in the use of Semantic Web technologies in Life Sciences. Rationale The web is a key medium for information publishing, and web-based information systems play a key role in biomedical information exchange and integration. At the same time, the variety and complexity of biomedical information call for the adoption of semantic-based solutions. The Semantic Web provides a set of technologies and standards that are key to support semantic markup, ontology development, distributed information resources and collaborative social environments. Altogether the adoption of the web-based semantic-enabled technologies in the Life Sciences has potential impact on the future of publishing, biological research and medicine. This workshop will provide a venue to present and discuss benefits and limits of the adoption of these technologies and tools in biomedical informatics and computational biology. It will showcase experiences, information resources, tools development and applications. It will bring together researchers, both developers and users, from the various fields of Biology, Bioinformatics and Computer Science, to discuss goals, current limits and some real use cases for Semantic Web technologies in Life Sciences. Topics Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Standards, Technologies, Tools for the Semantic Web: - Big Metadata - Semantic Web standards and new proposals (e.g.: RDF, OWL, SKOS, SPIN, RuleML, Microformats) - Tools for ontology editing, annotation, versioning and provenance management - RDF stores, NoSQL, reasoners, query and visualization systems - Knowledge representation for biomedical knowledge bases - Query federation systems for distributed knowledge and data discovery - Tools for semantics-enabled web publication Systems for a Semantic Web for Bioinformatics: - Biomedical knowledge bases on the Semantic Web - Semantic biomedical Web Services - Semantics-enabled biomedical information systems and solutions - Linked Data for biomedical research - Semantic Scientific Workflow Systems Existing and prospective applications of the Semantic Web for Bioinformatics: - Semantic Wikis - Semantic collaborative research environments - Semantic crowdsourcing and collective intelligence - Alternative approaches to biomedical metadata generation and management - Methods for data sharing and open data - Approaches to data privacy and security - Case studies, use cases, and scenarios Type of contributions The following possible contributions are sought: - Research papers - Position papers - Posters - Software demos Proceedings Proceedings of SWAT4LS will be published in CEUR Workshop proceedings. Please refer to the SWAT4LS website for detailed formatting instructions prior to submission: http://www.swat4ls.org/workshops/paris2012/call/ Special issue Authors of accepted contributions to the upcoming edition of SWAT4LS will be invited to submit to a special issue of the BMC Journal of Biomedical Semantics. Deadlines Expression of interest for tutorials: 5th July 2012 Submission opening: 3rd September 2012 Papers submission deadline (abstracts): 28th September 2012 Papers submission deadline (full text): 9th October 2012 Early registration deadline:
Re: [rules-users] Reg. Iterating over a list
Oh Ok, I get the point. The engine evaluates all the patterns when the current rule is being evaluated. And I have (!size(append(list, number)) 0) on the LHS, and so the append function is being evaluated. Is it possible to command the engine to not check patterns of a certain rules or certain agenda groups. BR Phani -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Reg-Iterating-over-a-list-tp4019512p4019572.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Re: [rules-users] Reg. Iterating over a list
On 04/09/2012, Phani Saripalli saripalli.ph...@gmail.com wrote: Oh Ok, I get the point. The engine evaluates all the patterns when the current rule is being evaluated. And I have (!size(append(list, number)) 0) on the LHS, and so the append function is being evaluated. Is it possible to command the engine to not check patterns of a certain rules or certain agenda groups. No. - And this wouldn't avoid problems resulting from side effects on the LHS. -W BR Phani -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Reg-Iterating-over-a-list-tp4019512p4019572.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
[rules-users] DSL Usage in Eclipse
Hi, I am trying to create DSL and use the DSL in the Eclipse Guided Editor. I am facing some difficulties in using DSL in the Guided Editor and have listed these below. Would appreciate someone can advise how to get over there. 1. When using the DSL Editor, the DSL file containes [condition] and [consequence] instead of [when], [then] (See below). Due to this the Guided Editor does not show the Conditions or Actions (when pressing Ctrl+Space Bar). The rule however executes correctly (and shows correctly in the DRL Viewer) so the issue seems to be with the Guided Editor only http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019575/dsleditor2.jpg http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019575/DSLEditor.jpg 2. If I have the DSLs broken into multiple DSL files, then the Guided Editor does not recognize this. Even the DRL Viewer gives an error (the error does not occur if I combine the 2 DSLs into a single DSL). See below. Again the code works so seems to be an error with the Editor only. http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019575/multiple_expander1.jpg http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019575/multiple_expander2.jpg 3. Using the DSL below, if I enter the when part in the DSLR (E.g.rule Validate Fight Type //include attributes such as salience here... when //conditions For a Flight with - flight type is 'LH') Then the Guided Editor for the Action/Then part stops working (i.e. I do not get any hints when pressing Ctrl+Space in the action part in the Guided Editor). If I however remove the entries in the Condition/When section of the rule, the Action now shows the correct hints. http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019575/dsl.jpg 4. Finally if I create a DSL for the basic operators and use them in the DSLR, the DSLR is not formed correctly (You can see the - in the field of the Object in the last image). Based on the documentation this should have just added the field with the -, and if I remove the - it is treated as a separate condition instead of a field of the Object - this part is as expected. Below I have the DSL and the DRL View of the Rules/DSLR. http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019575/basic_operators.jpg http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019575/basic_operators2.jpg http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019575/basic_operators3.jpg Thanks, dme -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/DSL-Usage-in-Eclipse-tp4019575.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
