The Samba Team Releases Version 2.2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heads up everyone, After a long wait (4 months since 2.2.5 and numerous bug fixes later), the final planned 2.2 release is here. With this release Samba 2.2 is now officially in maintenance mode only. The only fixes that will be accepted to the SAMBA_2_2 cvs branch are those which fix critical bugs in basic functionality. It's time to move on to Samba 3.0. Please refer to the complete release notes here http://www.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-2.2.6.html This is the latest stable release of Samba and is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. The source code can be downloaded from : http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/ in the file samba-2.2.6.tar.gz or samba-2.2.6.tar.bz2. Both archives have been signed as well using the Samba Distribution Key (samba-pubkey.asc is available in the same download directory as the source tarballs) Binary packages will be released shortly for major platforms and can be found at http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ As always, all bugs are our responsibility. --Enjoy The Samba Team WHAT'S NEW IN Samba 2.2.6 - 16th October 2002 = This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues addressed in this release including: * Fixes for MS-RPC printing issues affecting Windows 2000 clients * New support for smb.conf generation in SWAT * Inclusion of several performance enhancements (See --with-sendfile and the modified smb.conf(5) parameters in these Release Notes) * Fixes for several file locking bugs and returned status codes New Parameters - - -- Refer to the smb.conf(5) man page for complete descriptions of new parameters. * profile acls (S)workaround for issue with WinXP SP1 and roaming user profiles Removed Parameters - - -- * max packet (G) * packet size (G) Modified Parameters - - --- * max xmit (G)new default value * large readwrite (G) new default value New ./configure Options - - --- --with-sendfile Enable experimental sendfile support --with-winbind-ldap-hack Enable winbindd_ldap_hack() functionality for Windows 2000 native mode domains Changes since 2.2.5 - - See refer to the complete release notes and the SAMBA_2_2 cvs log for more details -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rjNiIR7qMdg1EfYRAhl0AJwIVxdSh40vtGER3XBs2Vpnn3ZdHwCg1TJf oPuOpcq2SFD3S5ShiJ+b3j0= =wsce -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Samba] nt pipe support and nt smb support in smb.conf
Regards, This is kind of urgent (isn't everything nowadays :-). Historically, our samba servers need to run with the two 'untouchables' nt pipe support and nt smb support both set to no (non default) based on a recommendation by one of our software vendors. These settings in smb.conf now prevents WIN2K SP2 clients from creating directories on the samba shares. The problem is that if I reset these two to default yes performance is better and creating directories are OK, but the application doesn't work. Despite the documentation saying that the nt smb support set to no could make Windows NT clients give faster performance with this option set to no, and this is still being investigated, does anybody know whether there are any need for these two parameters to be changed from the default ? This is with samba-2.2.5 nt pipe support (G) This boolean parameter controls whether smbd(8) will allow Windows NT clients to connect to the NT SMB specific IPC$ pipes. This is a developer debugging option and can be left alone. Default: nt pipe support = yes nt smb support (G) This boolean parameter controls whether smbd(8) will negotiate NT specific SMB support with Windows NT/2k/XP clients. Although this is a developer debugging option and should be left alone, benchmarking has discovered that Windows NT clients give faster performance with this option set to no. This is still being investigated. If this option is set to no then Samba offers exactly the same SMB calls that versions prior to Samba 2.0 offered. This information may be of use if any users are having problems with NT SMB support. You should not need to ever disable this parameter. Default: nt smb support = yes -- ** * Knut Hellebø | DAMN GOOD COFFEE !! * * Hydro IS Partner ESI (Unix) Team | (and hot too) * * Phone: +47 55 996870, Fax: +47 55 996342 | * * Cellular Phone: +47 93005151 | * * E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Dale Cooper, FBI* ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Don't know how to config after compiled the source code ?
Hi all, I was copy linux power's smb.conf to /usr/local/samba/lib and change few setting on smb.conf. After that I start the samba by following command: # /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd -D # /usr/local/samba/bin/nmbd -D NOW, I can see the samba server from the Windows XP workgroup but when I try to access the Samba it show the below error message on my Windows XP Pro: ( \\sunu5 is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. The account is not authorized to log in from this station. ) Can anyone tell me what's wrong on my smb.conf file (attached eith this mail) ? Also, what I need to do to solve my problem ? (p.s. Windows XP Pro User account and Samba user are same : Kevin) Thanks and regards, Kevin Chan linux power Wrote: smb.conf is located in /usr/local/samba/lib Attached is my smb.conf file. smb.conf Description: Binary data
[Samba] Samba 2.2.6rc4 RPMS released for Mandrake Linux 8.2 and 9.0
Hi! As usual, get them at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~staburet/freshsamba or http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/samba Get the SRPM at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~staburet/SRPMS Cheers, Sly -- Sylvestre Taburet - Project Manager - 1024D/030E1B7E Mandrakesoft S.A. - 43, rue d'Aboukir, 75002 Paris - FRANCE +33 (0) 1 40 41 00 41 - http://www.mandrakelinux.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] tail -f the missing data:2.2.5, 2.2.19-6.2.16,
Yes - RH7.2 + default 2.4 Kernels seem to solve the problem. So looks like I'll have to reinstall a bunch of machines. Out of curiosity, if you knew what was causing this in the 2.2 Kernel, I'd be interested. Thanks, Sean. -Original Message- From: Urban Widmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 October 2002 21:12 To: Sean Cullen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] tail -f the missing data:2.2.5, 2.2.19-6.2.16, On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Sean Cullen wrote: [Background] Redhat 6.2 2.2.19-6.2.16 Any chance of testing this on a 2.4.19 kernel? /Urban -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba LDAP
Hello samba, Any expert for samba LDAP ??? or any good docs? I am trying to use LDAP, but have some problems. At first I cannot import passwd file to ldap with import_smbpasswd.pl it say CNet::LDAP encountered an error while encoding the request packet that would have been sent to the server and connection with ldap is very slow. -- Best regards, Koriun mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Network down - timeouts URGENT
We have a problem with our linux embedded-system and samba units. We mount remote windows shared drives, and transfer a lot of file to/from them. If Windows crash :) or unpluggin RJ, our program hang on read/write calls ( and all other access to remote file ) for undefined time... WE NEED to set a SHORT timeout for connection lost !! The sockopt KEEP_ALIVE not help us! Is there some tuning to recognize netfail fairly? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] winbind
- Original Message - From: Norman Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 3:34 AM Subject: [Samba] winbind Hi, I have winbind working, as wbinfo -u wbinfo -g wbinfo -t snip Have you tried wbinfo -A Administrator%password Which gives Winbind a username to connect to the PDC with.. Have you checked the permissions for the home directory? chmod 700 directory/, chown DOMAIN+User directory/ , chown :'DOMAIN+Domain Users' directory/ Shaolin - IT Systems WB Ltd. .: http://www.security-forums.com :. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Need installation help of SAMBA on UNIX Sun- Solaris version 8 platform
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:12 PM Subject: [Samba] Need installation help of SAMBA on UNIX Sun- Solaris version 8 platform Dear Mr. Andrew Tridgell, snip RTFM springs to mind :) http://samba.mirror.ac.uk/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html http://samba.mirror.ac.uk/samba/docs/man/smbd.8.html http://samba.mirror.ac.uk/samba/docs/man/nmbd.8.html http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba.html Re the licence...which funny enough it says clearly on the front page.. Samba is freely available under the GNU General Public License. Read http://samba.mirror.ac.uk/samba/docs/GPL.html P.S. please note HTML e-mails make baby Jesus cry. Shaolin - IT Systems WB Ltd. .: http://www.security-forums.com :. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Runaway samba processes
Hi, Phil Chambers wrote: We have Samba 2.2.5 running on AIX 4.3.3. The server is a very heavy duty server, and has 3 main shares, which are very large. The problem is that after a few days of running, the server suddenly stops killing off newly spawned smbd processes. They do not die, even when the original smbd process is killed. They will respond to a kill -9, but killing off the main PID does not kill the runaway children. (Instead, their PPID goes to 1 ) I'm curious to see if this is in any way related to a problem we have. Are the ruaway processes using cpu or are they completely idle? We have a problem with smbd getting into a loop and consuming cpu. We do also see processes which do not get closed down, but it is just odd processes and I think they will kill with just a -TERM. This is happening on a huge server with gigabytes of real memory. It can handle thousands of these dead proocesses before slowing down - and then it's not the memory, but the huge process list. They do consume memory and CPU, however, so it may be related. What is the procedure for logging a bug with the Samba developers? Thanks, Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] integrated mail+ftp+samba+proxy auth mysql
Hello all thanks for the open source project I'm campus network administrator and I try to implement single-sign on with auth backend using mysql database!!! I have searched server that we need that using mysql as auth module for *nix and windows desktop and found : mail server -- qmail + vpopmail+mysql ftp server -- pureftp + mysql proxy server -- squid+mysql domain logon \ file server samba +mysql -- only work for 2.0.x , 2.2.x still on progress (by Jelmer Vernooij) print server / web server -- apache+mod_auth_mysql - but I have a difficulty, because each server use their own mysql database, table and password encryption, I want to that all server use same database and table and if could be use same password encryption method . Think that I want to ask, when samba auth mysql 2.2.x finish and why this project no include in samba head . And I want to know encryption methode that samba use place in what code in samba source code because i want to try to implement to other server . Sorry, for my bad English thanks for all of you attention and help Regards Anton -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems w/long file access times (samba2.2.5 WinXP pro) (fwd)
Hello all, we're currently having problems with Windows XP machines that have *very* long file access times for files that are located on our linux-based samba server (samba 2.2.5 / linux 2.4.18). This happens with all kinds of files, with all kinds of programs, including Office97, text editors, develoment environments, etc. Sometimes - the incidents itself seems to be random and is not reproducible so far - a program freezes after a file to be opened or saved is selected; depending on the program, it either - returns after a minute or so claiming the operation has failed, only to load/save the file successfully anyway most of the time, or - loads/saves the file as requested and unfreezes the program after up to 60 seconds. This only happens with our WinXP clients; the two legacy Win98 machines still in use don't ever complain about anything. I read something about oplock problems in an older mail on one of the samba mailing lists and tried tinkering with the parameters to no avail. Below, I include my smb.conf; a debug logs are available on request. Any help or insight into the matter is appreciated. Thanks Kasi Mir [global] workgroup = DY username map = /etc/samba/smb.usermap force unknown acl user = yes debuglevel = 10 encrypt passwords = yes preserve case = yes os level = 65 domain admin group = root mw mk fb ks mk security = user printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap domain master = yes domain logons = yes preferred master = yes max log size = 10 oplocks = yes time server = yes hosts allow = 10.0.2.0/255.255.255.0 remote announce = 10.0.2.255/DY logon home = \\double\home\.config\%m logon path = \\double\home\.config\%m auto services = netlogon logon script = %U.bat ;socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY interfaces = 10.0.2.200/255.255.255.0 oplock break wait time = 10 server string = Zentralserver [home] path = /home/%u browseable = yes create mode = 0770 directory mode = 0770 read only = no force group = users csc policy = disable ... [grafix] path = /fileserver/gfx browseable = yes create mode = 0770 directory mode = 0770 read only = no force group = users [prg] path = /server2/prg browseable = yes create mode = 0770 directory mode = 0770 read only = no force group = users [install] path = /server2/install browseable = yes create mode = 0770 directory mode = 0770 read only = no force group = users [technik] path = /server2/technik browseable = yes create mode = 0770 directory mode = 0770 read only = no force group = technik ... [printers] comment = All Printers browseable = yes printable = yes public = yes read only = yes create mode = 0700 directory = /tmp [netlogon] path = /fileserver/script browseable = no read only = yes write list = mw admin users = mw ...
Re: [Samba] Problems w/long file access times (samba2.2.5 WinXPpro) (fwd)
-[ on 10/16/02 02:21:12 PM +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ]- This only happens with our WinXP clients; the two legacy Win98 machines still in use don't ever complain about anything. I read something about oplock problems in an older mail on one of the samba mailing lists and tried tinkering with the parameters to no avail. I saw delayed access to Samba shares with WinXP until I turned off the WebClient service that runs on WinXP. It was trying to access the Samba server over port 80 and waiting for timeouts until then using the expected NetBIOS ports. After disabling the WebClient service on my XP machines, they accessed the Samba shares normally. As an administrator on the XP machine type services.msc into the run dialog. Then look for WebClient and stop or disable the service. See if this makes any difference. --Ben-- --- Ben Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] xp and joining a samba domain
I am having a problem with xp joining my samba domain. What are the best logs of samba to watch to help debug my problem. Thanks Bryan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba books ?
Have there or is there a samba refernce book published this year with information on xp integration and pdc information? -- Sincerely Bryan Pershall IT Consultant -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] to make a printer usable by all the world even with those which don't belong to the domain
hi, I am on on domain under samba 2.2.5. every run correctly. And in my smb.conf , i want to share my printer with all the world even with those which don't belong to the domain ? Does the fact of being in a NT domain make obligatorily inaccessible the printer to those which do not make party of the field? This is what I put in my smb.conf for the printer: [laserPCL] printable = yes print command = /usr/bin/lpr -r %s printer = lppublic read only = yes guest ok = yes browseable = yes printer driver = HP LaserJet 2100 Series PCL 6 comment = Imprimante Laser PCL Is it correct like this to that everyone can use it? Thanks in advance, MO -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Printer settings on 2.2.5
Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The problem has gone away...Users can use simplex/duplex printing from any application without problems. Mmmhh. Just one thing : when I upgraded to 2.2.6rc3, I did not remove the /usr/local/samba/var/locks/* files. I just restarted the smbd and nmbd daemons. Perhaps this is the trick ? Yes. Could be. Please retest... I installed 2.2.6rc4 this morning, took the basic config files (smb.conf, smbpasswd, ...) from my previous 2.2.5 installation, without copying the locks/* files and printer drivers files. I followed the instructions from the howto, and this time, everything runs smoothly :-). I must have done something bad during the last upgrade, but I do not know what :-(. -- Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Please assist with Winbind issues!
The homes share must have /home/%D as the path. /home/%D/%U, and blank does not work. This connects the user to a share named after the login ID, but double-clicking that share shows all of the folders in the /home/%D path rather than just the contents of the user's folder. Which makes sense, but why doesn't /home/%D/%U or a blank entry work? Thanks to everyone for your assistance. A blank entry should work - in what way does it 'not work'? Try 2.2.6rc2 - a stat() check has been removed that might have caused the problem. Samba 3.0 has even more advanced logic here. Andrew Bartlett No username share appears upon connecting to the server. Can't map it either. I'm intending to put this server into production within the next week or two, so I'd like to avoid using a non-production release. When is the next production release due, or is the current rc stable enough for production use? Thanks. Sven Ruth -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem Logging in to Samba PDC
Hello! Ok, recently upgraded from Samba 2.2.3a to 2.999+3.0.alpha20-2. After successfully joining the Win2k SP3 machine to the Samba PDC, I'm unable to log in. The error I get is the following: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect According to the docs, these are the steps I need to take. useradd -g 100 -d /dev/null -c irvpc -s /bin/false irvpc$ passwd -l irvpc$ smbpasswd -a -m irvpc So, before the upgrade, I could look at smbpasswd to see if the machine accounts where created successfully and if there were any duplicates. However, with this new version, all machine accounts are stored in a .tdb format. How can one go about looking at the contents of the .tdb files and which file should I be looking at? Sorry, I don't find any information on the .tdb files in the docs. Maybe someone can point me to some. Really appreciate any help...Thanks! IRV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] new server/recommendations
We are in the process of replacing a server and are in need of recommendations for what version of Samba to run. Thinking of running RH7.3 with about 200+ shares that consumes about 60G of data. Is the the standard to go with the latest and greatest? Roger -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Runaway samba processes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Robert Euston wrote: Hi - Thanks for the reply - Unfortunately we are running a 24 hour service, so a stop and start is not a good option for us. I'm looking at downgrading to an earlier version to see if that alleviates the problem. I think that this is looking like a bug in the samba code. Robert, Can you please retest using 2.2.6rc4 ? If this does not correct your problem, please send me more information such as client OS, version of server OS, smb.conf, etc Any specifics about your environment that might be a data point for tracking it down. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rXLzIR7qMdg1EfYRAiA6AKCZdwznsZ3wpV9jM7gUOjUZwThVQQCcC/MH OTqkD+EUh1e8yW1CbfZA4UQ= =2A2O -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] nt pipe support and nt smb support in smb.conf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Knut Hellebø wrote: Regards, This is kind of urgent (isn't everything nowadays :-). Historically, our samba servers need to run with the two 'untouchables' nt pipe support and nt smb support both set to no (non default) based on a recommendation by one of our software vendors. These settings in smb.conf now prevents WIN2K SP2 clients from creating directories on the samba shares. The problem is that if I reset these two to default yes performance is better and creating directories are OK, but the application doesn't work. What application ? Why did the vendor suggest disabling these two parameters? Also, please retest this with 2.2.6rc4. Thanks. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rXMxIR7qMdg1EfYRAvFAAKCGaCILCRApV1yg8KrhthUCu8U7XACgndBP gFXxl9sUSWKrW+GSRv+ZPUY= =l+HL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] No such file error when reading Win98 profiles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Ed Lally wrote: Hi all, I'm having an odd error with Samba 2.2.5 and I'm wondering if anyone can give me a hand with it. About a month ago, I upgraded from Samba 2.2.1 to 2.2.5 on RedHat 7.2 and, since then, my Win98 users have been receiving No such file or directory errors during login. The upgrade was installed using John Terpstra's RH 7.2 RPM package. Ed, Please retest with 2.2.6rc4. This has the ring of a mangling bug that Jeremy recently fixed. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rXPGIR7qMdg1EfYRAmT6AKC5dr5VNfIMaQ8HBdi9l7fUcJAHdgCglru+ pdE2hlPREwV2jizVJzepecc= =uhhz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] integrated mail+ftp+samba+proxy auth mysql
There are is an article in www.sysadminmag.com that you may be interested in called PAM-like authentication for Window Clients by Nathan Yocom. On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 06:23, anton heryanto wrote: Hello all thanks for the open source project I'm campus network administrator and I try to implement single-sign on with auth backend using mysql database!!! I have searched server that we need that using mysql as auth module for *nix and windows desktop and found : mail server -- qmail + vpopmail+mysql ftp server -- pureftp + mysql proxy server -- squid+mysql domain logon \ file server samba +mysql -- only work for 2.0.x , 2.2.x still on progress (by Jelmer Vernooij) print server / web server -- apache+mod_auth_mysql - but I have a difficulty, because each server use their own mysql database, table and password encryption, I want to that all server use same database and table and if could be use same password encryption method . Think that I want to ask, when samba auth mysql 2.2.x finish and why this project no include in samba head . And I want to know encryption methode that samba use place in what code in samba source code because i want to try to implement to other server . Sorry, for my bad English thanks for all of you attention and help Regards Anton -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- ** Roger Schmeits System Analyst Clarkson College http://www.clarksoncollege.edu Omaha, NE USA 1-800-647-5500 x22542 * -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Need installation help of SAMBA on UNIX Sun- Solarisversion 8 platform
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Mr. Andrew Tridgell, I am new to samba. I understood that it allows you to share the files from Microsoft windows env. and UNIX environment. I need to install the software on my UNIX machine. Do I need the license? Samba is released un the GNU General Public License v2. See the file COPYING in the root of the source distribution you downloaded. samba-latest.tar.gz I copied to UNIX env. and gunzip and tar to extract all the files. Is this correct step? Yes. See the docs/htmldocs/UNIX_INSTALL.html instructions and the O'Reilly Samba book included in docs/htmldocs/using_samba cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rXXmIR7qMdg1EfYRAtqnAKDX5UFcoHyzOJsvtcaaofCjAwL59wCfeBeO FF6AQoxWUn6rfWTYQk4ZNjY= =SQx3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NMBD going down almost immediately after startup
Hi, I'm having problems getting nmbd running. Server is RH7.3 + ACL patches. The problem is that the nmbd deamon crashes with the following error : [2002/10/09 04:42:43, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(794) Netbios nameserver version 2.2.5 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 [2002/10/09 04:42:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(234) find_response_record: response packet id 4894 received with no matching record. [2002/10/09 04:42:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(234) find_response_record: response packet id 4895 received with no matching record. [2002/10/09 05:38:50, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(59) Got SIGTERM: going down... smb.conf configuration is exactly the same as on another test server and it works over there. Could there be a problem with 'pam' that causes these issues ? wbinfo -t returns : secret is good wbinfo -g returns all PDC+groups wbinfo -u returns all PDC+users smbclient -L PDC returns pdc shares What is probably going wrong and what can I do to check certain settings or fix my problem ? Any suggestions/solutions anyone ? Thanks in advance Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] CVS Client
I downloaded cvs-1.11.2.tar.gz and gziped it and tarballed at to get the resulting file cvs-1.11.2 . I was expecting a ./configure or make program. Since I did not get this, I was wondering how to install this client? Regards, Ken Illingsworth -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with PDC + Printing
Hey all, i've gota problem setting Samba as PDC + Printing, The shared printers work perfectly while i'm not logged into the domain... - i can install printers under windows - i can print to installed printers The PDC (without printing) works perfectly... - i can join the domain as root - i can log into the domain as a unix/samba user - i can access to domain shares But when i try to install a printer while i'm logged into the domain as simple user or root i can't install printers. Windows says me i've got insufficient rights on my computer to connect to the selected printer... Please help ! i've spent too many time now :(( about 15 days trying different configs. Regards, Amaury DAILLIEZ IT Administrator Tornado Technologies Europe French Office Technical Manager Erian Concept http://www.erian-concept.com / http://www.open-scheme.com
Re: [Samba] new server/recommendations
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:07:17AM -0500, Roger Schmeits wrote: We are in the process of replacing a server and are in need of recommendations for what version of Samba to run. Thinking of running RH7.3 with about 200+ shares that consumes about 60G of data. Is the the standard to go with the latest and greatest? 2.2.6 should be out soon, that would be the latest stable version. -- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc. www.inethouston.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer www.FreeBSD.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem with PDC + Printing
Check valid users on the [print$] share. Amaury DAILLIEZ wrote: Hey all, i've got a problem setting Samba as PDC + Printing, The shared printers work perfectly while i'm not logged into the domain... - i can install printers under windows - i can print to installed printers The PDC (without printing) works perfectly... - i can join the domain as root - i can log into the domain as a unix/samba user - i can access to domain shares But when i try to install a printer while i'm logged into the domain as simple user or root i can't install printers. Windows says me i've got insufficient rights on my computer to connect to the selected printer... Please help ! i've spent too many time now :(( about 15 days trying different configs. Regards, Amaury DAILLIEZ IT Administrator Tornado Technologies Europe French Office Technical Manager Erian Concept http://www.erian-concept.com / http://www.open-scheme.com -- Yuri Pismerov, Sr. System Administrator, TUCOWS.COM INC. (416) 535-0123 ext. 1352 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] xp and joining a samba domain
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 08:53, Bryan Pershall wrote: I am having a problem with xp joining my samba domain. What are the best logs of samba to watch to help debug my problem. all the logs are in /var/log/samba you'll probably want to break the logs out by machine so it's easier to follow. you can do that with a log file = /var/log/samba/log.smbd.%m parameter in smb.conf if you search the archives of this list you'll probably find the solution to your problem. google's +site:lists.samba.org works well brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem Logging in to Samba PDC
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:47, Irving Carrion wrote: Hello! Ok, recently upgraded from Samba 2.2.3a to 2.999+3.0.alpha20-2. After successfully joining the Win2k SP3 machine to the Samba PDC, I'm unable to log in. The error I get is the following: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect did you apply the signorseal reg fix - thats needed on 2kSP2+ i believe. According to the docs, these are the steps I need to take. useradd -g 100 -d /dev/null -c irvpc -s /bin/false irvpc$ passwd -l irvpc$ smbpasswd -a -m irvpc So, before the upgrade, I could look at smbpasswd to see if the machine accounts where created successfully and if there were any duplicates. However, with this new version, all machine accounts are stored in a .tdb format. How can one go about looking at the contents of the .tdb files and which file should I be looking at? I use the ldap backend so i don't know what's up with the tdbsam stuff. I believe you can configure samba to continue to use smbpasswd and passwd with a passdb backend = smbpasswd in your conf file Sorry, I don't find any information on the .tdb files in the docs. Maybe someone can point me to some. you can sort of see what there with strings name.tdb brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] NMBD going down almost immediately after startup
This is an obvious question, but needs to be asked. When you said that the smb.conf is exactly the same, did you change the netbios name for your second server? The netbios names cannot be the same on two machines. Skip Dobrin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bart Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 11:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] NMBD going down almost immediately after startup Hi, I'm having problems getting nmbd running. Server is RH7.3 + ACL patches. The problem is that the nmbd deamon crashes with the following error : [2002/10/09 04:42:43, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(794) Netbios nameserver version 2.2.5 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 [2002/10/09 04:42:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(234) find_response_record: response packet id 4894 received with no matching record. [2002/10/09 04:42:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(234) find_response_record: response packet id 4895 received with no matching record. [2002/10/09 05:38:50, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(59) Got SIGTERM: going down... smb.conf configuration is exactly the same as on another test server and it works over there. Could there be a problem with 'pam' that causes these issues ? wbinfo -t returns : secret is good wbinfo -g returns all PDC+groups wbinfo -u returns all PDC+users smbclient -L PDC returns pdc shares What is probably going wrong and what can I do to check certain settings or fix my problem ? Any suggestions/solutions anyone ? Thanks in advance Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Don't know how to config after compiled the source code ? (Solved !)
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 05:18, Kevin Chan wrote: Dear all, Finially my problem solved, after I change the following setting on my WindowsXP and reboot the PC: Using the registry editor (regedit), create the registry setting HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkStation\Param eters Add a new DWORD value: Value Name: EnablePlainTextPassword Data: 0x01 I strongly recommend against using plain text passwords... you can use encrypted passwords between samba and winXP. Just leave samba with its default settings and you should be able to log in. If you can't you'll need to add your user on the samba server to the samba password database with smbpasswd -a username brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Problem Logging in to Samba PDC
Brad, thanks for the reply. Yes I did apply the signorseal reg fix for xp. I'm sure I could vi the .tdb file and see some strings, but I would also like to edit it. Thanks for the response! IRV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Windows Drivers and SAMBA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Michael E Johnson wrote: I am currently using 2.2.5 and also using the ESP Print Pro 4.2.2 (this is built on the CUPS principle) I have every thing (it would seem) Working ok, one of the items that I was required to setup was the PRINT$ category. Under this I was told to put a directory called drivers in the path /etc/samba/ I assume that this is where I am to place the drivers for the defined printers that my windows clients will hit via SAMBA connection in order to print. My question is is this in fact where the drivers go? And how should the drivers (for the windows side) be set into this. When the client connects to the SAMBA server via the printer it looks to see if the driver exists in the share, if not it goes to the clients machine, can any one help me set this up the correct way? Pleas read http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#PRINTING cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rZJSIR7qMdg1EfYRAo4tAJ0d31ZSNClGSVYuOKDb0VDxJVZQEgCfSwLI z8cxn/SKTKIXeeEGLyRqn6k= =B6p6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] newbie question multiple samba servers in a single workgroup
Hi All, I can set up sambaon a linux box in a workgroup (interfacing between windows 2000 red hat 7.2). The problem arises when I try and setup 2 or more samba servers each on a distinct linux box within a single workgroup. Can anyone help ? I have tried giving them different netbios names and specifying one as the preferred master. Any ideas ? Thanks in advance, Steve
Re: [Samba] Problem with PDC + Printing
This value is not set, it means that all users are allowed to access this share (according to Samba documentation) :( Any other way ? Amaury. - Original Message - From: Yura Pismerov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Amaury DAILLIEZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 5:49 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Problem with PDC + Printing Check valid users on the [print$] share. Amaury DAILLIEZ wrote: Hey all, i've got a problem setting Samba as PDC + Printing, The shared printers work perfectly while i'm not logged into the domain... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 2.2.4
Can you let me know how to shut shutdown the SAMBA Services and remove SAMBA 2.2.4 from Solaris 8? Thanks, Larry -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Printing W2K net use lpt Fixed
Upgrading from 2.2.5 to 2.2.6rc4 seems to have fixed this problem. James Hubbard James Hubbard wrote: Hello, I've got a problem with printing on a Windows 2K box. Printing from that box to a samba server via the normal print mechanism works fine. The problem is when the person needs to print to a lpt port. The capture succeeds, but when the file is copied to lpt2 it never gets printed. There are other machines that can do the capture and copy to the lpt port but they are Win 9x. The files being copied are plot files generated by a cad program. I noticed in the How-To that using enumports might be needed to make using lpt ports work. It's not working though and I'm still getting the same error message. I've just started using disable spoolss = yes but that doesn't seem to help either. All relevant information is below. Any help is appreciated. James Hubbard This is the command being used to capture the port. net use lpt2: \\server-bristol\hp450c Samba version 2.2.5 RedHat 7.2 Windows 2K with the latest service packs. smb.conf [global] .. printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes enumports command=/home/samba/ports.sh disable spoolss = yes printing = lprng ... security = share [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes writable = no printable = yes public = yes use client driver = yes This is the error messages that I'm getting in the log file for that machine. [2002/10/15 14:27:22, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 28282 (2.2.5) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2002/10/15 14:27:22, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) === [2002/10/15 14:27:22, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1092) PANIC: internal error [2002/10/15 14:27:26, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(38) === [2002/10/15 14:27:26, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 28631 (2.2.5) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2002/10/15 14:27:26, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) === [2002/10/15 14:27:26, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1092) PANIC: internal error -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba 2.2.6rc4 RPMS released for Mandrake Linux 8.2 and 9.0 (and8.0 and 8.1)
Sylvestre Taburet wrote: Hi! As usual, get them at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~staburet/freshsamba or http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/samba Get the SRPM at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~staburet/SRPMS Anyone wanting to test RC4 on 8.0 or 8.1, please see: http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/samba/samba-2.2.6rc4/ Shout if there's a particular feature which is disabled in the build which you need to test. IIRC, 8.0 and 8.1 have winbind, nss_wins, acl and LDAP disabled by default (and these are default builds). Regards, Buchan -- |Registered Linux User #182071-| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smb_errno: class ERRDOS, code 112 from command 0xb
On 15 Oct 2002, Erik Enge wrote: Hi. We run Samba 2.2.1a in production and it seems to be working fine. We run it on RedHat 7.2, kernel 2.4.7-10smp. All of a sudden (I'm sure it's for a reason, but I can't tell why), this shows up in the logs: Oct 15 10:36:03 mumbai kernel: smb_errno: class ERRDOS, code 112 from command 0xb Oct 15 10:36:03 mumbai kernel: smb_errno: class ERRDOS, code 112 from command 0xb Oct 15 10:36:03 mumbai kernel: smb_writepage_sync: failed write, wsize=512, result=-5 Could anybody tell me if this is something to worry about and what might be causing it? It's got nothing to do with your samba server. Someone was using smbfs and the server returned an error on the write command (0xb = SMBwrite). /Urban -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] tail -f the missing data:2.2.5, 2.2.19-6.2.16,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Sean Cullen wrote: Yes - RH7.2 + default 2.4 Kernels seem to solve the problem. So looks like I'll have to reinstall a bunch of machines. Out of curiosity, if you knew what was causing this in the 2.2 Kernel, I'd be interested. Most likely smb_revalidate_inode and friends. The client doesn't see the size change (I believe tail -f looks for a size change ...) so it doesn't read anything. But when opening for editing the data is checked again and the changes appear. It would be possible to compare the code between kernels and fix it in 2.2 also. /Urban -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Possible bug in SAMBA connection close?
Hey all, I've been fighting a samba share/unmount problem for several days now and may have found a bug in the connect/disconnect code. Basically, it seems that while everything claims to free the connection to the share, it doesn't actually happen. This is me closing ALL windows to the server: log.smbd: jon1 (192.168.200.2) connect to service disc1_pc_test as user breakit (uid=501 , gid=501) (pid 2908) [2002/10/16 10:13:27, 10] smbd/service.c:make_connection(672) calling vfs_ops.connect for service disc1_pc_test (options = ) jon1 (192.168.200.2) closed connection to service IPC$ [2002/10/16 10:13:37, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(48) Yielding connection to IPC$ jon1 (192.168.200.2) closed connection to service disc1_pc_test [2002/10/16 10:13:38, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(48) Yielding connection to disc1_pc_test smbstatus: Samba version 2.2.5 Service uid gid pid machine -- IPC$ jon_monroe jon_monroe 2908 jon1 (192.168.200.2) Wed Oct 16 1 0:10:55 2002 No locked files lsof disc1_pc_test: smbd2908 root 19r DIR7,1 2048 65536 /DVD_BURN/disc1/disc_test_pc/ smbd2908 root 23r DIR7,1 2048 65536 /DVD_BURN/disc1/disc_test_pc/ fuser disc1_pc_test: /DVD_BURN/disc1/disc_test_pc/: 2908 I've tried disabling all cache options I know of, and it hasn't made any difference. Here is a snip of my current smb.conf: [disc1_pc_test] comment = virtual PC volume from ISO image path= /DVD_BURN/disc1/disc_test_pc guest ok= yes valid users = root, jon_monroe, breakit force user = breakit force group = breakit oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no read only = yes posix locking = no locking = no This is on a RH8.0 x86 box, running K 2.4.18, and self installed samba 2.2.5. Due to the specific use, I can't use the pre/post exec functions for the unmount, though I don't see how it would make a difference. So, is there something I'm missing? Something else to try? Is this behavior normal? :) Thanks for any help! Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Problem Logging in to Samba PDC
I have a feeling this can be a cache problem. Anyone have a clue about which .tdb can be erased or how to clear cache in Samba 3.0 Alpha 20-2? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Irving Carrion Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Problem Logging in to Samba PDC Hello! Ok, recently upgraded from Samba 2.2.3a to 2.999+3.0.alpha20-2. After successfully joining the Win2k SP3 machine to the Samba PDC, I'm unable to log in. The error I get is the following: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect According to the docs, these are the steps I need to take. useradd -g 100 -d /dev/null -c irvpc -s /bin/false irvpc$ passwd -l irvpc$ smbpasswd -a -m irvpc So, before the upgrade, I could look at smbpasswd to see if the machine accounts where created successfully and if there were any duplicates. However, with this new version, all machine accounts are stored in a .tdb format. How can one go about looking at the contents of the .tdb files and which file should I be looking at? Sorry, I don't find any information on the .tdb files in the docs. Maybe someone can point me to some. Really appreciate any help...Thanks! IRV -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Welcome to the samba mailing list
I am trying to set samba up so that it will allow connections from a certain IP range, and allow any user to view a share with no validation of the user. I am setting this up under sco unix. [global] netbios name = BILL2000 server string = BILL2000 security = SHARE guest account = ntsuser oplocks = False null passwords = yes encrypt passwords = yes remote announce = 192.168.0.255 remote browse sync = 192.168.0.255 remote browse sync = 192.168.0.255 [DAT] comment = NTS Shared Data path = /u/NTS/dat read only = No guest ok = Yes public = yes - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 12:04 PM Subject: Welcome to the samba mailing list Welcome to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list! To post to this list, send your email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] General information about the mailing list is at: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba/jeff%40domintcom.com You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word `help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. It is: wookie If you forget your password, don't worry, you will receive a monthly reminder telling you what all your lists.samba.org mailing list passwords are, and how to unsubscribe or change your options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. You may also have your password mailed to you automatically off of the Web page noted above. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] does smbmount use keepalive and/or smb.conf?
Greetings, I don't know how common an issue this is as I haven't found much in the list archives that was helpful to me, so I'm hoping for some pointers. FYI, we have samba 2.3.3a-6 running on the 2.4.18-10 kernel. There seems to be an issue with smbfs mounts at times where connectivity may be lost (e.g. Win share becomes unavailable) causing local processes such as lsof or ps, among others, to hang. We've tried passing the -o sockopt=SO_KEEPALIVE parameter, but that doesn't seem to have made any difference. How do we set the keepalive time for these smbmounts? Does it use the value in smb.conf? Are we missing something else? The man page for smb.conf seems to suggest using either the IPTOS_LOWDELAY or IPTOS_LOWDELAY/TCP_NODELAY in a local network, and then suggests IPTOS_THROUGHPUT for WANs (it doesn't say if only this flag, or in addition to the previous). We haven't tried either because the document isn't clear. This needs to work in both a LAN and WAN. Are we missing something fundamental in trying to make this stable? Is this even achievable, or is this inherent to this type of connectivity? Regards, Richard Duran __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos More http://faith.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
I have two problems, the first being the most pressing. When accessing any host on the network (except my own) I get th following error. balor@guevara tmp $ smbclient '//bart/' -U balor added interface ip=149.157.246.17 bcast=149.157.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 Got a positive name query response from 149.157.246.28 ( 149.157.246.28 ) Password: Domain=[OURDOMAIN] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME Our network setup is slightly screwy (it uses arpspoofing) so if someone could just tell me what this error means I think I can figure out the problem myself, and let others know. Thanks, Aidan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] does smbmount use keepalive and/or smb.conf?
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:43:30 -0700 (PDT), Richard Duran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There seems to be an issue with smbfs mounts at times where connectivity may be lost (e.g. Win share becomes unavailable) causing local processes such as lsof or ps, among others, to hang. http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Transfer rate on NT/XP/2000 with service pack 6a
Hi SAMBA, This is not quite a remark on SAMBA, more a report of a problem that is not related to SAMBA. However it could be of concern to your developers team. At our company we recently (last week) installed two new fileservers. The next thing we got was a very strange effect. The configuration: - Two fileservers, running (i believe) Windows 2000, with service pack 6A and included all service and patches currently available. - Two servers running Sterling Connect Direct. - Several other NT servers and workstations running NT 4 with servicepack 6. The Connect Direct servers are used to transfer data from and to our mainframe. The data can be located anywhere on a fileserver within our LAN or even WAN. After the new fileservers were installed the data-troughput dropped from several MB per second to bytes per second. A file download from mainframe to LAN would take some seconds before, now it takes up to hours! However, an upload was no problem. We checked the connect direct servers and discovered that the only servers it would have a problem with were in fact the two new ones. No problems were found when the data was transferred to the old servers or workstations. Also when the files were transferred to the Connect direct servers itself there was no problem. When the file afterwards was to be moved from the CD-server to the LAN normal speeds were recorded. So only when transferring directly from mainframe to LAN, by the CD-server, was a problem. At this stage we have received a message that the SMB protocol has been changed. It was discovered that it had a serious security leak that has been 'repaired' with the most recent fixes. We don't know what has changed, but it seemds that there is some kind of checking on the transfer that will lead to a serious drop in the transfer rates. My guess would be that if there is a non-windows environment involved in the datatransfer it will be treated in a 'very safe' way, and by this it cannot get a normal transfer rate. Actually, well I'm a mainframe guy, I don't want to know what has been changed. To me, windows is one giant security leak but anyway. I imagine this could be of interest for those who have an interrest in the SMB protocol. If this is true for a mainframe connection it very well could be true for some *nix connection too. We do not use unix in our shop, nor SAMBA so we can't test this one. At home I've used SAMBA a few times to get my Linux connect to my Windows system. It has never been setup properly, I only used it to get some files from my windows to my linux without using FTP. Regards, Berry van Sleeuwen. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] winbind
- Original Message - From: Gareth Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Have you tried wbinfo -A Administrator%password When I type this with appropriate substitutes I get a prompt. Can't do anything but Ctrl+C to exit. : Which gives Winbind a username to connect to the PDC with.. : : Have you checked the permissions for the home directory? : : chmod 700 directory/, chown DOMAIN+User directory/ , chown :'DOMAIN+Domain : Users' directory/ /home: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 19 Oct 15 04:56 DOMAIN/ drwxr-xr-x 3 mis mis 84 Oct 11 17:54 mis/ /home/DOMAIN: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 3 nzhang Domain Users 84 Oct 15 04:56 nzhang/ /home/DOMAIN/nzhang: total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 nzhang Domain Users 6 Oct 15 04:56 tmp/ I still can't login, keep getting the prompt for username and password. Please help. Regards, Norman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device)
Hi all ! Reposting this because I got no ideas/information at all, hoping for some kind of response this time. I have a little problem here mounting or browsing samba shares. I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2 running samba, and a share on that called public. when I try to mount that share it asks for password, and then gives an error: ex. libra# mount_smbfs //maxi@samba/public /mnt Password: mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) libra# I can list the shares with smbclient, no errors at all. I can not login to the samba like this: libra# smbutil login //maxi@samba Password: smbutil: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) smbutil: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) smbutil: could not login to server SAMBA: syserr = Invalid argument libra# I have checked /dev and there is one entry for nsmb0: libra# ll /dev/nsmb* crw--- 1 root wheel 144, 0 Oct 14 15:23 /dev/nsmb0 libra# I don't think the problem is server related because it works on another Windows workstation on the same LAN. Any ideas on what this might be? Need more info? Just ask, I'll give all info I can... Regards: Markku / Maxi -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb*device)
On 16 Oct 2002, Markku Kokko wrote: Hi all ! Reposting this because I got no ideas/information at all, hoping for some kind of response this time. I have a little problem here mounting or browsing samba shares. I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2 running samba, and a share on that called public. when I try to mount that share it asks for password, and then gives an error: ex. libra# mount_smbfs //maxi@samba/public /mnt Password: mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) libra# Maybe try: mount_smbfs //samba/public /mnt -o username=maxi,password=secret,... - John T. I can list the shares with smbclient, no errors at all. I can not login to the samba like this: libra# smbutil login //maxi@samba Password: smbutil: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) smbutil: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) smbutil: could not login to server SAMBA: syserr = Invalid argument libra# I have checked /dev and there is one entry for nsmb0: libra# ll /dev/nsmb* crw--- 1 root wheel 144, 0 Oct 14 15:23 /dev/nsmb0 libra# I don't think the problem is server related because it works on another Windows workstation on the same LAN. Any ideas on what this might be? Need more info? Just ask, I'll give all info I can... Regards: Markku / Maxi -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no/dev/nsmb* device)
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 21:41, John H Terpstra wrote: On 16 Oct 2002, Markku Kokko wrote: Hi all ! Reposting this because I got no ideas/information at all, hoping for some kind of response this time. I have a little problem here mounting or browsing samba shares. I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2 running samba, and a share on that called public. when I try to mount that share it asks for password, and then gives an error: ex. libra# mount_smbfs //maxi@samba/public /mnt Password: mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) libra# Maybe try: mount_smbfs //samba/public /mnt -o username=maxi,password=secret,... - John T. That did not help... But I will check with the FreeBSD mailing list too, should have thought of that first. Thank you anyways ! Regards: Markku / Maxi I can list the shares with smbclient, no errors at all. I can not login to the samba like this: libra# smbutil login //maxi@samba Password: smbutil: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) smbutil: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device) smbutil: could not login to server SAMBA: syserr = Invalid argument libra# I have checked /dev and there is one entry for nsmb0: libra# ll /dev/nsmb* crw--- 1 root wheel 144, 0 Oct 14 15:23 /dev/nsmb0 libra# I don't think the problem is server related because it works on another Windows workstation on the same LAN. Any ideas on what this might be? Need more info? Just ask, I'll give all info I can... Regards: Markku / Maxi -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] mount_smbfs: can't get handle to requester (no /dev/nsmb* device)
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:35:22PM +0200, Markku Kokko wrote: Hi all ! Reposting this because I got no ideas/information at all, hoping for some kind of response this time. I have a little problem here mounting or browsing samba shares. I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2 running samba, and a share on that called public. when I try to mount that share it asks for password, and then gives an error: Odds are this will be a question for [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] if nobody here can help you. What you are having problems with is smbfs not samba itself and I'm not sure if this list supports smbfs. -- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc. www.inethouston.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer www.FreeBSD.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Multiple Domains?
Hi Again, A bunch of people contacted me telling me to start up a second copy of SAMBA, but unfortunately, no one seems to know how to do it? When I try to launch a second copy of smb and nmb with pointers to the new smb.conf file, I get: [2002/08/27 18:37:20, 0] lib/pidfile.c:pidfile_create(86) ERROR: nmbd is already running. File /usr/local/samba/var/locks/nmbd.pid exist s and process id 39187 is running. [2002/08/27 18:41:14, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(65) Got SIGTERM: going down... And I can't see any way to tell nmb to place the second .pid file elsewhere. Do I need to recompile a second copy of samba, using /usr/local/samba2 as the directory or something? TIA Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Multiple Domains?
I thought someone suggested configuring smbd on a different port but am not sure , never did this but curious as i think only one root smbd runs and all are children -Original Message- From: Steve Morley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] Multiple Domains? Hi Again, A bunch of people contacted me telling me to start up a second copy of SAMBA, but unfortunately, no one seems to know how to do it? When I try to launch a second copy of smb and nmb with pointers to the new smb.conf file, I get: [2002/08/27 18:37:20, 0] lib/pidfile.c:pidfile_create(86) ERROR: nmbd is already running. File /usr/local/samba/var/locks/nmbd.pid exist s and process id 39187 is running. [2002/08/27 18:41:14, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(65) Got SIGTERM: going down... And I can't see any way to tell nmb to place the second .pid file elsewhere. Do I need to recompile a second copy of samba, using /usr/local/samba2 as the directory or something? TIA Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] ERRNO=Network is unreachable
Linux on a Windows network. Linux running Samba. Simple smb.conf file. Shares seen in network neighborhood (of the Linux box) keep becoming unavailable. nmbd keeps quitting (I know this because when I restart smb, smbd quits then restarts but nmbd does not quit because it already quit. The restart works and you can see the share fine again. The log.nmb says (multiple times): 2002/10/14 16:28:47,0 libsmb/nmblib.c:send udp (754)Packet send failed to 192.168.254.255 (138) ERRNO=Network is unreachable Another similar one says:nmbd/nmbd packets.c:send netbios packet (171) send netbios packet: send packet () to IP 192.168.254.255 port 137 failed And finally there is one that says Could not determine network interfaces, you must use a interfaces config line. Any ideas?
RE: [Samba] Multiple Domains?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Clark Rawlins wrote: [2002/08/27 18:37:20, 0] lib/pidfile.c:pidfile_create(86) ERROR: nmbd is already running. File /usr/local/samba/var/locks/nmbd.pid exist s and process id 39187 is running. [2002/08/27 18:41:14, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:sig_term(65) Got SIGTERM: going down... And I can't see any way to tell nmb to place the second .pid file elsewhere. See the pid directory parameter (or is it pidfile directory?) cheers, jerry -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9reHdIR7qMdg1EfYRAgxfAJ96jqtYDJKh8qtk3baX9ufIAVK+iQCfUE6M g1r9MlXRIIQ0A+kc3E9FKHA= =WAXO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] winbind
- Original Message - From: Norman Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] : wbinfo -u : wbinfo -g : wbinfo -t : getent passwd : getent group : : all displays valide results. However, when I clicked on tried to get to the : shared home from network neighborhood I keep getting prompt for password. No : matter what I enter the prompt continues. I see /home/MY_SERVER/user1 is : created, and I did login as user1 on W2K station. I don't have a samba user1 : though. Would someone please give me a few pointers? Does entering %H for : path %S for valid user on the HOME share matters? Thanks. I found the solution by searching the archive and trial and error. I need to set valid user to %D\%S since the domain homes are in /home/%D/%S. Thanks. Regards, Norman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Problem Logging in to Samba PDC
Im having the same problem, everything was working fine, my Win 2k machines were logging on to the Samba domain, when I upgraded to SP3 the newly upgrade machines failed to log on. The error I was getting was access denied. Machine account does not exist etc. I removed each machine from the domain cleaned up the machine accounts within Samba and tried re-joining the domain with no luck. The Win2K machines that I didnt upgrade have no issues neither do the two Win 98 machines. I have the same problem when I try to join an XP machine to domain, is it possible that Microsoft has done something in XP and SP3 to stop these machines joining a Samba domain? Cheers Chris Tepaske
RE: [Samba] NMBD going down almost immediately after startup
This is an obvious question, but needs to be asked. When you said that the smb.conf is exactly the same, did you change the netbios name for your second server? The netbios names cannot be the same on two machines. These names were already changed (so much for 'exactly the same' I almost sound like a user =) lol). I did already change the netbios names and after that I removed and added the machine from the domain, just to make sure. Hi, I'm having problems getting nmbd running. Server is RH7.3 + ACL patches. The problem is that the nmbd deamon crashes with the following error : [2002/10/09 04:42:43, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(794) Netbios nameserver version 2.2.5 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 [2002/10/09 04:42:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(234) find_response_record: response packet id 4894 received with no matching record. [2002/10/09 04:42:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(234) find_response_record: response packet id 4895 received with no matching record. [2002/10/09 05:38:50, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:terminate(59) Got SIGTERM: going down... smb.conf configuration is exactly the same as on another test server and it works over there. Could there be a problem with 'pam' that causes these issues ? wbinfo -t returns : secret is good wbinfo -g returns all PDC+groups wbinfo -u returns all PDC+users smbclient -L PDC returns pdc shares What is probably going wrong and what can I do to check certain settings or fix my problem ? Any suggestions/solutions anyone ? Thanks in advance Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Problem Logging in to Samba PDC
you probably need to apply the signorseal reg fix to your clients. brad On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 18:17, Chris Tepaske wrote: I'm having the same problem, everything was working fine, my Win 2k machines were logging on to the Samba domain, when I upgraded to SP3 the newly upgrade machines failed to log on. The error I was getting was access denied. Machine account does not exist etc. I removed each machine from the domain cleaned up the machine accounts within Samba and tried re-joining the domain with no luck. The Win2K machines that I didn't upgrade have no issues neither do the two Win 98 machines. I have the same problem when I try to join an XP machine to domain, is it possible that Microsoft has done something in XP and SP3 to stop these machines joining a Samba domain? Cheers Chris Tepaske -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Printing...
Yes, it can print OK. But I can't even connect to the Samba printer share with Win2K. Regards, Brad On Wednesday 16 October 2002 20:08, you wrote: Can your linux box print to it? if linux can then so can samba, if not then samba can't Brad sambauser@sportingwheeli To: Samba mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] es.org.au cc: Sent by:Subject: [Samba] Printing... [EMAIL PROTECTED] rg 16/10/2002 06:26 I am using Red Hat 8.0 and I am trying to get an HP LaserJet 4 Plus to become a shared printer so networked Windows PCs can print to it. I have Samba working fine for sharing files with Windows PCs and I have begun wading through the Samba documentation to enable printing and I have come up with an smb.conf entry that looks like this: [HP4Plus] guest ok = yes comment = Brad's HP Laser printable = yes writable = yes path = /var/spool/samba Testparm says all is OK but my Win2K PC still can't see it, so do I need to do anything else? I know that there are GUI tools available, but I have to do this on a couple of different version Red Hat servers that don't have X installed, so I would like to be able to do it manually if I can. The Samba docs are pretty heavy going for me so any advice would be appreciated. Regards, Brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Possible bug in SAMBA connection close?
Well, I think I partially found out why this is acting strangely. I've tried this on both samba 2.2.5 and 2.2.6rc4. The file handles work a little differently between kernel 2.2 and kernel 2.4. On kernel 2.2, when you access a directory, you get a single CWD open handle (from LSOF 4.47): COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME smbd12659 root cwd DIR8,5 4096 624027 test This CWD is the only handle opened. This handle will stay in use until you click the 'up one folder' button. Just closing the window doesn't seem to help. On Kernel 2.4 you get 3 opened handles. 2 are read handles, while the other is a CWD: (from LSOF 4.63): COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME smbd14270 root cwd DIR8,2 4096 131038 disc_test_pc/ smbd14270 root 22r DIR8,2 4096 131038 disc_test_pc/ smbd14270 root 23r DIR8,2 4096 131038 disc_test_pc/ When you close the window OR click the 'up one folder' button the cwd handle is released. However, the 2 extra read handles are not released. And, every instance of access to that folder generates 2 more extra read handles. This will happen for EVERY folder inside a share, or the share itself. Actually, the CWD handle will disappear by itself if you wait a few minutes, even if the folder is still in use. So, after using a share with lots of folders on kernel 2.4 you see LOTS of open folder handles when you run a lsof -p smb_pid_of_a_workstation even if you've closed all windows to everything on that server, or you clicked the heck out of the 'up one folder' button.. Oh, the above test was without mounting anything. That folder had just a single file in it. Soo...is there anyone out there using samba plus rh 8.0/kernel 2.4 plus sharing a cdrom drive where the disc is being changed regularly? Are you having problems unmounting the disc? :) Again, RH 8.0, kernel 2.4.18, x86 Thanks, Jon At 11:03 AM 10/16/2002 -0700, you wrote: Hey all, I've been fighting a samba share/unmount problem for several days now and may have found a bug in the connect/disconnect code. Basically, it seems that while everything claims to free the connection to the share, it doesn't actually happen. This is me closing ALL windows to the server: log.smbd: jon1 (192.168.200.2) connect to service disc1_pc_test as user breakit (uid=501 , gid=501) (pid 2908) [2002/10/16 10:13:27, 10] smbd/service.c:make_connection(672) calling vfs_ops.connect for service disc1_pc_test (options = ) jon1 (192.168.200.2) closed connection to service IPC$ [2002/10/16 10:13:37, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(48) Yielding connection to IPC$ jon1 (192.168.200.2) closed connection to service disc1_pc_test [2002/10/16 10:13:38, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(48) Yielding connection to disc1_pc_test smbstatus: Samba version 2.2.5 Service uid gid pid machine -- IPC$ jon_monroe jon_monroe 2908 jon1 (192.168.200.2) Wed Oct 16 1 0:10:55 2002 No locked files lsof disc1_pc_test: smbd2908 root 19r DIR7,1 2048 65536 /DVD_BURN/disc1/disc_test_pc/ smbd2908 root 23r DIR7,1 2048 65536 /DVD_BURN/disc1/disc_test_pc/ fuser disc1_pc_test: /DVD_BURN/disc1/disc_test_pc/: 2908 I've tried disabling all cache options I know of, and it hasn't made any difference. Here is a snip of my current smb.conf: [disc1_pc_test] comment = virtual PC volume from ISO image path= /DVD_BURN/disc1/disc_test_pc guest ok= yes valid users = root, jon_monroe, breakit force user = breakit force group = breakit oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no read only = yes posix locking = no locking = no This is on a RH8.0 x86 box, running K 2.4.18, and self installed samba 2.2.5. Due to the specific use, I can't use the pre/post exec functions for the unmount, though I don't see how it would make a difference. So, is there something I'm missing? Something else to try? Is this behavior normal? :) Thanks for any help! Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Multiple Domains?
Hi, And I can't see any way to tell nmb to place the second .pid file elsewhere. See the pid directory parameter (or is it pidfile directory?) Okay, lightbulb went off, I'm still at 2.0.7, reading the docs online, I see that this was added to 2.2.4 Downloading the latest now. Thanx Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Connecting Linux to Windows Me
Hi, When I try using Samba in linux 8 to share out some files in linux to a Windows Me. I am able to ping both computers on each. I am able to access files Windows Me files from Linux smbclient command. But when I go to Windows ME the my network places I am able to see the linux computer icon. When I click on it, it shows that the computername or filename not share or network resource not available. At times, it says it cannot find resource on the server. I have defined in the samba server the share name as [myshare] path=/home/dk/ ... ... But somehow I cannot see this share resource in Windows. I have done the Steps in Diagnosis.txt. It all test ok. What should I do next? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Multiple Domains?
Downloading the latest now. Okay, now for the scary part. This machine is live, and in use all day every day. Anything I should know about upgrading from 2.0.7 to 2.2.5? I always like having a backup plan in place before something major like this. Does SAMBA rely on anything outside it's own directory? I want to make a couple of tarballs so I can go back if needed. TIA Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba NSS_LDAP
Hi all! A while ago I caught a discussion re Samba and LDAP SAM backend, with OpenLDAP and nss_ldap. It seems that the reason the smbd process keeps crashing (and thus losing connections) has something to do with the fact that the LDAP standard allows connections to be unilaterally closed by the directory server, and this was causing Samba to crash. Again - this is my hazy recollection of the thread. I'm seeing this behavior in my setup (Samba LDAP-based PDC). Is my summary above (mostly) correct? Is there a fix for this? Is it included as part of 2.2.6 or is it a problem with OpenLDAP/nss_ldap? We plan to do a rather large Samba install soon, and I'd like to know in advance if I'm going to have to handle the Samba PDC account storage differently. Best Diego -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Multiple Domains?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Steve Morley wrote: Downloading the latest now. Okay, now for the scary part. This machine is live, and in use all day every day. Anything I should know about upgrading from 2.0.7 to 2.2.5? Wait until later tonight for 2.2.6 :-) Seriously, an upgrade from 2.0.7 to 2.2.6 should not be taken lightly. How big of a server and number of clietns are we talking about? Does SAMBA rely on anything outside it's own directory? I want to make a couple of tarballs so I can go back if needed. tar up /usr/local/samba and you should be ok. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rgadIR7qMdg1EfYRApaRAKDqi07TaWEZOLsBnEKnnf1iUAM5YgCfVuwA 3hkueGZ/EUNQoqPweRVinjA= =RUSz -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Your Kind Attention!
Bulawayo, REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE Dear friend, This is a proposal in context but actually an appeal soliciting for your unreserved assistance in consummating an urgent transaction requiring maximum confidence. Though this approach appears desperate, I would advise that whatever questions you intend to verify as regards this proposal will be very welcome as a clearer understanding on both sides means a successful transaction which is our ultimate goal. My name is Mr. PAUL NENGE, Chief Credit Officer (CCO) Standard Chartered Bank Bulawayo, ZIMBABWE. On December 6, 1999, a Foreign consultant/contractor with the ZIMBABWE Electoral Commission, Mr. Thierry COSBAN, made a numbered time (Fixed) Deposit for twelve calendar months, valued at US$30,000,000.00, (Thirty Million, United States Dollars) in my branch. Upon maturity, I sent a routine notification to his forwarding address but got no reply. After a month, I sent a reminder and finally we discovered from his contract employers, the ZIMBABWE Electoral Commission, that Mr. Cosban died from an automobile accident. On further investigation, I found out that he died without making a WILL. I therefore made further investigation and discovered that Mr. Cosban did not declare any next of kin or relations in all his official documents, including his Bank Deposit paperwork in our Bank. I have carefully moved out these funds (US$30million) from our bank as sundry funds to an offshore bank in Europe where the funds is safe. From past experiences, I know that no one will ever come forward to claim the deceased funds. According to ZIMBABWEAN Law, at the expiration of 5 (five) years, the funds will be Unclaimable and revert to the ownership of the ZIMBABWE Government if nobody applies to claim the fund. In order to avert this negative development, I in conjunction with a colleague (the Chief Operating Officer in the bank) now seek your permission to allow my attorney do a backdated CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP/REASSIGNMENT OF CREDIT of stated funds from the deceased to your name, so that the funds (US$30million) would be released to you as the new owner (on behalf of me and my colleague). We are writing you because, as public servants, we cannot operate a foreign account without the supervision of my bank or have an account that is more than Zw$1,000,000.00 locally and the fact that the original owner of the funds is a Foreigner. Consequently, I will present you as the owner of the funds in the offshore Bank so you can be able to claim it with the help of my attorney. This is simple. I will like you to provide immediately your: FULL NAMES/FULL CONTACT ADDRESS/PHONE/FAX NUMBERS, so that my Attorney will prepare the necessary documents which will put you in place as the new owner of the funds. The money will then be released to you by the offshore bank, for us to share in the ratio of 75% for us and 25% for you. There is no risk at all as the Attorney will do all the paperwork, which will facilitate and guarantee the successful execution of this transaction. If you are interested, please reply immediately via my email address. Upon your response, I shall then provide you with more details, my confidential phone number and further direction that will assist our understanding for a successful completion of this transaction. No doubt this proposal could make you apprehensive, however we imploy you to observe utmost confidentiality and be rest assured that this transaction would be most profitable for both of us because we shall require your assistance to invest our share in your country (PLEASE NOTE THAT YOUR ADVISE IN THIS REGARD WILL BE VERY NECESSARY) This is why your urgent action and response is of priority to enable us conclude this transaction in a timely and professional manner. Awaiting your urgent reply via my email. Thanks and regards. Mr. PAUL NENGE. Chief Credit Officer (CCO) Standard Chartered Bank Bulawayo ZIMBABWE -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba with ipfilers and NAT
i am running freebsd stable with ipfilter and NAT is there anything that i have to do different with the smb.conf file to be able to mount a windows share mount_smbfs //user@server/share_name /path/to/mountpoint and everytime i get this message mount_smbfs: can't get server address: ssyerr = operation timed out is there something that i am missing i can ping the windows box and i have tried the ip as the server name and that still will not work i have also put the windows name in the /etc/hosts file and the same thing keeps happening i can access the samba shares from windows fine before i put ipfilters and NAT on everything worked great thanks for your help Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Still can't make it work (LONG)
Well gang, I'm back and still haven't figured out why Samba isn't working with my Windoze PC's. I though I was close a couple times, but now I'm back to square 1. So now I'm going to spill as much information on you guys as I can in the hope that someone will notice what I'm doing wrong and help me get this thing running. Here are the computers on my home network: A. Linux Box (luke) - AMD Athlon 750 MHz, 256 MB RAM, (2) 20 GB IDE HD's RedHat 7.3 (kernel 2.4.18-3) Samba v2.2.6pre2-1 3Com 3C509 PCI TPO Ethernet Adapter IP set by DHCP from ISP (Time Warner/RoadRunner) This machine also boots Windows 2000 Professional and can browse other Windows shares when using Windows 2000. smb.conf file for this machine is attached. I've scaled it down to make it easier/faster to read. This box has both ipchains and iptables installed. I'm not sure if these can cause the problems I'm having or not. B. Windoze Box #1 (jarjar) - Toshiba Satellite Laptop, Pentium III 750 MHz Windows 98 SE Netlink PCMCIA Ethernet Card IP set by DHCP from ISP C. Windoze Box #2 (obi-wan) - 486 DX2 66Mhz, 8 MB RAM, 400 MB HD WFW 3.11 MS TCP/IP32 3Com 3C509 ISA Ethernet Card I tried running through the DIAGNOSIS.txt file with the following results: Test 1: testparm shows all clear Test 2: (from obi-wan) ping luke: Success (had to manually supply IP address) (from luke) ping obi-wan: Success (had to manually supply IP address) Test 3: smbclient -L luke: Success (asks for password but accepts blank) Test 4: nmblookup -B LUKE __SAMBA__: Success Test 5: nmblookup -B JARJAR '*' : Failed (name_query failed to find name *) nmblookup -B OBI-WAN '*': Failed (name_query failed to find name *) Tried this one with ipchains/iptables and without - same result both times Test 6: nmblookup -d 2 '*' : Returns only the IP of the Linux box. Test 7: smbclient //luke/homes : Success Test 8: (from obi-wan) net view \\luke: Failed (couldn't find computer name on network) I've tried to telnet from one machine to the other on port 139, and each attempt fails. However, when I try to telnet into a machine from itself, it worksfrom each machine. This has led me to believe that there is a problem in the network at the hub level...but what could that be? Both Windoze machines are able to share and browse at will. If the Win machines can't connect to each other on port 139, how are they sharing? I hope someone on the list can help. This has been a problem long enough now. Thanks in advance, DJ Busch -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and Make Utility Question
Hello, I am experiencing problems with gcc make, as well as, the MS Visual Studio IDE not making projects properly. Files that should be recompiled are not and also files that were not touched at all are being compiled. Secondarily, I am wondering if locks on files are somehow not being released. I have some Windows batch scripts that are erroring when copyinf files from the samba server. The file create permissions allow for access. However, it is acting as though there is some sort of sharing violation on the files. I am running these batch file when there is no activity on the Windows and/or samba servers. I realize this is a rather strange inquiry. Are there any issues in these areas with this release of samba? If so, how can I best fix the probles? I will provide whatever is required to address the problem. Our samba server is running FreeBSD 4.6.2 on and AMD 1400 MHz Athlon processor. We are running server version 2.2.4. Thank You, Paul LeDuc [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Doh!
I forgot to attach the smb.confso here ya's go. Thanks. DJ Busch # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2002/10/16 21:47:46 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = LEGEND netbios name = LUKE server string = Dave's Linux Experiment Gone Wrong interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = Yes security = SHARE encrypt passwords = Yes null passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 33 lm announce = True preferred master = True domain master = True dns proxy = No guest account = default hosts allow = ALL [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /home read only = No guest ok = Yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [hp] path = /var/spool/samba read only = No guest ok = Yes printable = Yes printer name = hp oplocks = No
[Samba] don't let this one pass you by!!!
check this out it's worth your time, see att. Fw_ viaus Don't let this one pass you by!.email Description: Binary data
[Samba] don't let this one pass you by!!1
check this out its worth your time, see att. Fw_ viaus Don't let this one pass you by!.email Description: Binary data
[Samba] The Samba Team Releases Version 2.2.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heads up everyone, After a long wait (4 months since 2.2.5 and numerous bug fixes later), the final planned 2.2 release is here. With this release Samba 2.2 is now officially in maintenance mode only. The only fixes that will be accepted to the SAMBA_2_2 cvs branch are those which fix critical bugs in basic functionality. It's time to move on to Samba 3.0. Please refer to the complete release notes here http://www.samba.org/samba/whatsnew/samba-2.2.6.html This is the latest stable release of Samba and is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. The source code can be downloaded from : http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/ in the file samba-2.2.6.tar.gz or samba-2.2.6.tar.bz2. Both archives have been signed as well using the Samba Distribution Key (samba-pubkey.asc is available in the same download directory as the source tarballs) Binary packages will be released shortly for major platforms and can be found at http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ As always, all bugs are our responsibility. --Enjoy The Samba Team WHAT'S NEW IN Samba 2.2.6 - 16th October 2002 = This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues addressed in this release including: * Fixes for MS-RPC printing issues affecting Windows 2000 clients * New support for smb.conf generation in SWAT * Inclusion of several performance enhancements (See --with-sendfile and the modified smb.conf(5) parameters in these Release Notes) * Fixes for several file locking bugs and returned status codes New Parameters - - -- Refer to the smb.conf(5) man page for complete descriptions of new parameters. * profile acls (S)workaround for issue with WinXP SP1 and roaming user profiles Removed Parameters - - -- * max packet (G) * packet size (G) Modified Parameters - - --- * max xmit (G)new default value * large readwrite (G) new default value New ./configure Options - - --- --with-sendfile Enable experimental sendfile support --with-winbind-ldap-hack Enable winbindd_ldap_hack() functionality for Windows 2000 native mode domains Changes since 2.2.5 - - See refer to the complete release notes and the SAMBA_2_2 cvs log for more details -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rjNiIR7qMdg1EfYRAhl0AJwIVxdSh40vtGER3XBs2Vpnn3ZdHwCg1TJf oPuOpcq2SFD3S5ShiJ+b3j0= =wsce -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: who's on
Will compiling with --with-utmp allow you to see users on your network through 'w' and finger? I am not especially new to samba, been running it for a good 3 years of solid performance, but I never played with much else in besides LDAP and Cups support. what does --with-utmp actually do? -Peter While smbstatus is the 'quick' answer, the --with-utmp code (also needs 'utmp =yes' in smb.conf makes the actual 'finger' and 'w' programs work, rather than scripted replacements. Andrew Bartlett -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Possible to install client only from source
Mandrake (and probably most other distributions) have samba split up into multiple packages (common, client, server, etc). Does samba's build system allow for these pieces to be built/installed independently? I've scanned docs and checked out configure options and the 'make install*' targets, but don't see any obvious way of doing this. Thanks. -casey -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] (no subject)
Hi, When I try using Samba in linux 8 to share out some files in linux to a Windows Me. I am able to ping both computers on each. I am able to access files Windows Me files from Linux smbclient command. But when I go to Windows ME the my network places I am able to see the linux computer icon. When I click on it, it shows that the computername or filename not share or network resource not available. At times, it says it cannot find resource on the server. I have defined in the samba server the share name as [myshare] path=/home/dk/ ... ... But somehow I cannot see this share resource in Windows. Can you help? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hmmm. Special XP weirdness/brokenness. Windows 2K working on 2.2.2 and 2.2.5 and Windows XP Not (not the usual problems)
Hi, We have some special weirdness happening with Samba and windows XP here. Background: We are wanting to install a third party product passlogix, V-GO single sign on product on windows (http://www.passlogix.com), which authenticates against a windows server. Basically it uses the windows Authentication to allow the decryption of a credential database, to allow automatic signing on to many Applications. It allows a user only to have to remember a single password, and then sign on to multiple Applications. Great appplication. Useful for medicos, who otherwise have to remember 10 passwords that roll each month Etc. Anyway. To cut a long story short. We have tried this on 2.2.5 and 2.2.2 and the same thing happens. Anyway. We install the product on W2K and it works and on WINXP (against the same samba server and she broke). The product requires the user to re-authenticate prior to decrypting the credential database. Some samba logs of the product working nicely are http://www.aeco.com.au/~ajones/log.good http://www.aeco.com.au/~ajones/log.smbd.good http://www.aeco.com.au/~ajones/log.smbd.good (all in HTML format) Now when we run the SAME product on win XP, she no authenticates. http://www.aeco.com.au/~ajones/log.bad http://www.aeco.com.au/~ajones/log.smbd.bad http://www.aeco.com.au/~ajones/log.nmbd.bad Now interestingly. When we use *DISCONNECT* the WINXP box from the network (using winXP) cached credentials, ie no samba Authentication it works like a treat. ONLY when Samba is queried she broke. We can provide a copy of the passlogix product if people are keen to help. Seems like the WinXP is doing things differently. Now I should point out that WINXP, authenticates against the samba server as part of the windows login PERFECTLY. So as far as windows is concerned everything is nice with samba, only this third party product, which WE HAVE To RUN is broken. All help is gladly appreciated. I don't want to have to install active directory. Thanks Alan B. Jones Mobile 0412 04 3178 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeco Pacific Pty Ltd www.aeco.com.au Brisbane: Level 2, 269 Wickham Street Fortitude Valley, Qld 4006 Ph: +61 7 3250 1523 Fax: +61 7 3250 1515 Sydney: Level 11, 32 Walker Street North Sydney 2060 PO Box 395 North Sydney, 2059 ph: +61 2 9458 5867 fax: +61 2 9458 5967 about email from Aeco Pacific
help me!thanks!
guy:I had purchased a ntifs kit.Now I am developping a NFS software in the kit.This software have a Smb server and some win2000 server nodes which are the smb clients.The Raid can be accessed by all win2000 server nodes.My software can working in good manner,but it have some errors.One of them is when a win2000 node modify a file(directory)(e.g. add a file and delete a file),the others win2000 nodes can not know the modification and can not update automatically.I do not know how can modify this error.In DDK\src\filesys\smbmrx\sys\fsctl.c has the function.NTSTATUSMRxSmbNotifyChangeDirectory( IN OUT PRX_CONTEXT RxContext)/*++Routine Description: This routine performs a directory change notification operationArguments:RxContext - the RDBSS contextReturn Value:RXSTATUS - The return status for the operationNotes:A directory change notification opertaion is an asychron
ous operation. Itconsists of sending a SMB requesting change notification whose response isobtained when the desired change is affected on the server.--*/{NTSTATUS Status = STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED;DbgPrint(META: MRxSmbNotifyChangeDirectory zwl.\n);DbgPrint(MajorFunction is %d\n,RxContext-MajorFunction);DbgPrint(MinorFunction is %d\n,RxContext-MinorFunction);#ifdef METASMB_PRINT_FUNCTIONDbgPrint(META: MRxSmbNotifyChangeDirectory.\n);#endifRxDbgTrace(+1, Dbg, (MRxNotifyChangeDirectory...Entry\n, 0));RxDbgTrace(-1, Dbg, (MRxSmbNotifyChangeDirectory - %08lx\n, Status ));return Status;}The function have not been implemented.If I want to modify the error,what will I do?Would you be so kind to give mesome advices.thanks!My email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]I am individual not a co
mpany.
=
¾«Áé:ÖйúµÚÒ»¸öQ°æÈ«3DÍòÈËÍøÂçÓÎÏ·,¿ÉÒÔÎÞÏÞʱ¼äÃâ·Ñ²âÊÔ.
Ãâ·ÑÓÊÏ佡¿µÉ±¶¾´óÐж¯£¡
·ÉÎèÄãµÄ¾«Áé ÁôסÄãµÄ¾«²Ê ¾«ÁéÈ«ÃæÊÕ·Ñ£¡
ÅÄÂôÕ¾ÈÈÍÆÐÂÉúÈëѧ´óÅÄÂô£¡
Re: [Samba] upgrade to 3.0alpha20: accented chars in filenamesunreadable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can anyone comment on this? On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: Upon upgrading from 2.2.5 to 3.0alpha20 on Debian unstable, filenames with accented characters (ie: éàî etc.) became unreadable. For example in W2K a filename previously called résumé.xls became r when looking at the samba share; and the filename is impossible to modify from windows: samba log says file not found. From the shell the file looks like r?sum?.xls but the ? are actually 0x83. Now, the file contents are intact and if modified from the unix command line to non-accented they become accessible again from windows. FWIW I used the following command to sanitize all filenames: % rename -v 's/\x8c/i/g;s/[\x83\x8a\x82]/e/g' **/* I know I'm using an alpha samba and unstable debian, but still I'd like to understand what happened, if possible. Is this a known issue? - -- - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rXTaIR7qMdg1EfYRAot3AKDgaiF0XKDYcksBN50wggwId4UqPQCZAXad j6dXwsi/W+gR5IVXMXpLrJ0= =pDfG -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Samba] upgrade to 3.0alpha20: accented chars in filenames unreadable
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can anyone comment on this? On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: Upon upgrading from 2.2.5 to 3.0alpha20 on Debian unstable, filenames with accented characters (ie: éàî etc.) became unreadable. For example in W2K a filename previously called résumé.xls became r when looking at the samba share; and the filename is impossible to modify from windows: samba log says file not found. From the shell the file looks like r?sum?.xls but the ? are actually 0x83. In a hurry I used unix charset = CP850 http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/smb-ldap-3-howto.html#internationalization this solved our problems (redhat 7.2; samba-3.0a20) for example in the profile load on the spanish xp (ie Star menu--menú Inicio). Ignacio -- Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTI, Director fax:948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAINhttp://www.unav.es/cti/
MSDN goodies.
Microsoft have documented all the DOS error codes at : http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/debug/base/system_error_codes.asp Plus here's the docs on the internal (NTDLL.DLL) API they use to convert from NT_STATUS to DOS error codes. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/debug/base/rtlntstatustodoserror.asp Enjoy :-). Jeremy.
Re: MSDN goodies.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:33:45PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Microsoft have documented all the DOS error codes at : http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/debug/base/system_error_codes.asp Note that if you turn off Javascript (always a good idea) you can display just the table of error codes by using the URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/debug/base/system_error_codes.asp?frame=false Plus here's the docs on the internal (NTDLL.DLL) API they use to convert from NT_STATUS to DOS error codes. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/debug/base/rtlntstatustodoserror.asp I note that this second one says: Remarks There is no function that provides the inverse functionality of RtlNtStatusToDosError... That suggests that server-to-server communication is always expected to use NT_STATUS codes. See: http://ubiqx.org/cifs/figures/smb-07.html If you had a situation that was the opposite of what is shown in the diagram (smb-07) then the server in the middle would need to have a mechanism for converting DOS codes to NT_STATUS codes. That is, if you had a PDC and a server that had negotiated DOS codes and the client wants NT_STATUS codes, then either: - the client would also need to make do with DOS codes, or - the server in the middle would need to translate from DOS to NT_STATUS codes. I mention all this because when I asked people about it while writing that part of my book there were some different answers. Fun stuff. Chris -)- -- Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On to Samba 3.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Everyone, I am glad to say that 2.2.6 is out and is the last planned 2.2 release. I know many people have been working on Samba 3.0 for several months now. Now we can all focus on 3.0. Thanks to everyone who helped out in the past 4 months to get 2.2.6 out the door. btw...I'm planning on the next 3.0alpha release on 10/25. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9rjmxIR7qMdg1EfYRAgpuAKCDV0HEhyreOBvLAqstI6gBM9J6qQCeMN3t xeQtEZ6Hhxc4KpPEm6UnCzA= =H3nU -END PGP SIGNATURE-
CVS update: samba/source/groupdb
Date: Wed Oct 16 09:41:42 2002 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/groupdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31161/groupdb Modified Files: mapping.c Log Message: Create group mappings on the fly. Volker Revisions: mapping.c 1.38 = 1.39 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/groupdb/mapping.c?r1=1.38r2=1.39
CVS update: samba/source/rpcclient
Date: Wed Oct 16 18:10:09 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpcclient In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12809/rpcclient Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD rpcclient.c Log Message: Check in fix for CR#91 - seems to be working fine. Jeremy. Revisions: rpcclient.c 1.120.2.4 = 1.120.2.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpcclient/rpcclient.c?r1=1.120.2.4r2=1.120.2.5
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Wed Oct 16 18:21:55 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv13997/rpc_server Modified Files: srv_spoolss_nt.c Log Message: fix from APP_HEAD to commit a re-init'd printer to disk Revisions: srv_spoolss_nt.c1.354 = 1.355 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c?r1=1.354r2=1.355
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Wed Oct 16 18:23:15 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv14097/rpc_server Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 srv_spoolss_nt.c Log Message: merge from app_head to commit re-init'd printer to disk Revisions: srv_spoolss_nt.c1.277.2.14 = 1.277.2.15 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c?r1=1.277.2.14r2=1.277.2.15
CVS update: samba
Date: Wed Oct 16 19:12:09 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv19339 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2_RELEASE WHATSNEW.txt Log Message: preparing for final 2.2.6 release Revisions: WHATSNEW.txt1.34.6.10.2.41 = 1.34.6.10.2.42 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/WHATSNEW.txt?r1=1.34.6.10.2.41r2=1.34.6.10.2.42
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Wed Oct 16 20:09:22 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25345/printing Modified Files: printing.c Log Message: Never do a ZERO_STRUCT on a structure in a linked list, it's dumb :-). Jeremy. Revisions: printing.c 1.166 = 1.167 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/printing.c?r1=1.166r2=1.167
CVS update: samba/source/printing
Date: Wed Oct 16 20:09:51 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/printing In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25429/printing Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 printing.c Log Message: Never do a ZERO_STRUCT on a structure in a linked list, it's dumb :-). Jeremy. Revisions: printing.c 1.139.2.6 = 1.139.2.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/printing/printing.c?r1=1.139.2.6r2=1.139.2.7
Re: CVS update: samba/source/passdb
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:49:58AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Wed Oct 16 15:49:58 2002 Author: vlendec Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30073 Modified Files: pdb_ldap.c Log Message: No functional change. I'm trying to understand pdb_ldap.c and found an unecessary parameter to ldapsam_search_one_user. Please don't do that. We supply this paramater to all functions here - this allows us to always be able to get to state information without static globals etc. While these functions didn't use the infromation now, we will need it when we add connction caching (we would have to store the new connection back onto that struct). Andrew Bartlett
CVS update: samba/packaging/RedHat
Date: Wed Oct 16 21:50:44 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/packaging/RedHat In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4077/packaging/RedHat Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2_RELEASE samba2.spec.tmpl Log Message: sync with SAMBA_2_2 Revisions: samba2.spec.tmpl1.18.6.17.2.12 = 1.18.6.17.2.13 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/RedHat/samba2.spec.tmpl?r1=1.18.6.17.2.12r2=1.18.6.17.2.13
CVS update: samba/source/include
Date: Wed Oct 16 23:57:14 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21583/include Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD doserr.h Log Message: Full list of printer error codes. Jeremy. Revisions: doserr.h1.24.2.3 = 1.24.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/doserr.h?r1=1.24.2.3r2=1.24.2.4
CVS update: samba/packaging/Debian
Date: Thu Oct 17 01:40:41 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/packaging/Debian In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1392/Debian Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 README Log Message: last minute packaging changes from Eloy Revisions: README 1.1.2.5 = 1.1.2.6 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/Debian/README?r1=1.1.2.5r2=1.1.2.6
CVS update: samba/packaging/Debian/debian/patches
Date: Thu Oct 17 01:40:41 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/packaging/Debian/debian/patches In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1392/Debian/debian/patches Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_2_2 fhs.patch loadparm.patch smbmount-nomtab.patch Log Message: last minute packaging changes from Eloy Revisions: fhs.patch 1.1.2.3 = 1.1.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/Debian/debian/patches/fhs.patch?r1=1.1.2.3r2=1.1.2.4 loadparm.patch 1.1.2.4 = 1.1.2.5 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/Debian/debian/patches/loadparm.patch?r1=1.1.2.4r2=1.1.2.5 smbmount-nomtab.patch 1.1.2.3 = 1.1.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/packaging/Debian/debian/patches/smbmount-nomtab.patch?r1=1.1.2.3r2=1.1.2.4
