RE: [Samba] samba PDC
You missed a crucial piece of information - what client are you using? If it is XP then you will need to apply a registry change - read http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba.html "Use the Group Policy editor (gpedit.msc) and disable the "Domain Member: Digitally encrypt or sign secure channel data". Alternately, you can make the following change to the registry: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters]"requiresignorseal"=dword: " Noel -Original Message-From: Liviu Balan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 11 November 2002 08:47To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Samba] samba PDC Hello I'm trying to replace the windows PDC of my company with a linux one. I've tried doing this with samba...It allows me to join a computer to the specific domain, but it won't allow me to log in, although i've created the users and passwords (useradd and smbpasswd) Can anyone please email me a smb.conf example that works for him/her? Thank you ---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.410 / Virus Database: 231 - Release Date: 31/10/2002
Re: [Samba] File corruption with write cache enabled - patch included
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:52:10PM +0200, Rasmus Borup Hansen wrote: I recently found out that write caching in samba sometimes leads to file corruption (the setup program for Sophos Antivirus generates corrupted files when making a central installation on a Samba share). This morning I tracked down the place in the Samba code that leads to corruption. Here is what happened to me: write cache size is 8192 bytes. A client opens a new file and writes byte no. 30959. This byte is cached. Then the program write byte no. 61919 which is written directly to the disk, since the cache doesn't go that far. The client then writes bytes no. 0 through 61920. Since these bytes don't fit into the cache they are written directly to the disk. However, the cached byte at position 30959 is not discarded. When this byte is later written to the disk, the file will get corrupted. The patch below detects this situation and discards the cached byte(s). I guess that some profiling code should also be added at some time. The patch is against version 2.2.5. Perhaps you should warn users of current versions against using write caching. I believe that this bug is the same as bug no. 24502 submitted by Henrik Qwinto [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Best regards, and thank you for making Samba, Damn good call ! Very good bugfix. I've committed it to all Samba branches. Thanks a *lot* for this fix ! Jeremy. -- Is this patch included in 2.2.6. Perhaps you should warn users of current versions against using write caching. Are we talking about oplocked files or has it also something to do with strict sync. Bo. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] MSDFS...
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 18:52, Fabrizio Morbini wrote: Hi, After some experiment with MSDFS on Samba I have seen this problems and I don't know if this are caused by my possible wrong configuration or if are feature of MSDFS: So my question is: How can I use the replication feature (if exists) of MSDFS? MSDFS is distributed, but not replicated. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Samba] Import File Size Limits?
Hi There, Can you tell me why we can't import a MBOX folder which is 67Mb ion size. It was a Outlook Folder whcih was imported to Netscape copied to Mozilla On the linux 8.0m system and I have asked Ximian to Import the folder, The problem is that It times out and the same applies to another folder which is about 65Mb in size. Can you supply me with a patch or temp fix. Secondly , can you tell me how I can import Outlook Contacts into Ximian. We are officially moving to Linux as our chosen Operating System, and this move is issential for our staff members.. Thanks Lloyd -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Multiple Groups Assigned to a File
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Message: 14 From: Noel Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Jess Cannata' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Samba] Multiple Groups Assigned to a File Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:07:33 - -Original Message- From: Jess Cannata [mailto:doubtful500;hotmail.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 14:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Multiple Groups Assigned to a File I'm new to this group so I hope that this is the right place to ask this question (if not, let me know): We are setting up several Samba servers and we've run into a problem with file permissions. We've have a few shared folders that we'd like for some GROUPS to have read/write access and other GROUPS to have only read access. I cannot figure out how to do this because Linux/Unix seems to have the limitation that a file can only be owned by one user and one group, and the permissions are only applicable to the owner (user and group). Is there a way to assign more than one group to a file, and make it so the different groups have different permissions (Like NDS and Microsoft do)? If not, how do people get around this? Thanks for any help. Should have added that if you want more sophisticated (and therefore more complex administration) permissions then you can use ACLs. However at the moment this requires that you compile your kernel with ACL support using patches or grab an ACL enabled kernel/filesystem like XFS from SGI. ACLs don't require that you recompile your kernel, just choose your distro. ACLs (with support in samba) have worked out the box (on XFS) on Mandrake since 8.1, and 9.0 also supports ACLs on ext2/ext3. With 2.4.19 kernels and later however, you need to mount any FS which uses ACLs with the acl option before they will work, and this is not the default (since it breaks LSB-copmliance). I think SuSE also has ACL support, but I don't use it, so can't be sure. Regards, Buchan - -- |Registered Linux User #182071-| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE9z4YKrJK6UGDSBKcRAg0gAJwKNEiqjEN1RDgONG/RzhSghdyKBQCgjBk/ nUWefO9nZ3IZ9DlcNA9agTM= =IGfp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and non-ASCII characters
Hi, I'm have my first Samba PDC 2.2.6 up and running (great!) but I have a problem with *some* non-ASCII characters. Here are some details: - Windows (Win98, Win2k and WinXP) clients use Portuguese-Brazillian (pt-BR) as language. - Linux distribuition: Mandrake 9.0 with the latest updates (from MandrakeSoft) and Portuguese-Brazillian support. - 'chcp' from a command prompt give me: Active code page = 850 - Some relevant options in my smb.conf: client code page = 850 character set = ISO8859-1 default case = lower preserve case = yes case sensitive = no short preserve case = yes I'm logged as root in my Linux box and as administrator in my NT server box and smbmounted a share of my interest. I'm just trying to copy some folders from NT to Linux. Now my real problem: I can't access a directory or file named 'Atualização' or 'Á.doc' for example. A ls or cp command give me 'No such file or directory' error message. If I rename them (server-side) to 'Atualizaçao' or 'Atualizaçéo', etc. I can access them. Any other file or directory I can access w/o a problem. Have you experienced something like that ? Probably I'm doing a mistake somewhere... Thanks. --- Fabio Lindner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] nmbd is not working
Hi, I'm having a hard time running samba. I was going through the DIAGNOSIS.txt, and found that on test 4, nmblookup -B... returns nothing. I was trying to run samba from swat's status. smbd seems to work since when I click start button, the daemon appears on the list, but nmbd doesn't. I was thinking that nmbd was incorrectly installed as described in DIAGNOSIS,txt, but how many times I redownload samba, nothing changes. I'm using samba 2.2.6 on redhat 7.3. Thanks in advance Taki -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] making Samba works together with PAM
Ok fellows, This is my last try. Please, anybody tell me if something is missing on this list! I need to setup on a Linux + Samba (PDC) to restrict just one login per ID (not allow two logins with same id).So: 1 - edit /etc/pam.d/samba - chaging session line with session required /lib/security/pam_limits.so 2 - in /etc/security/limits.conf: * - maxlogins 1 3 - in smb.conf: obey pam restrictions = yes utmp = yes 4 - compile Samba --with-utmp And the last question: Samba provided by RedHat 7.3(valhalla) as RPM package has the --with-utmp option compiled, or I must download the source code of 2.2.6 to get this feature? Thank you very much, = Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.imortais.cjb.net -- Hell is empty and all the devils are here. -- Wm. Shakespeare, The Tempest ___ Yahoo! GeoCities Tudo para criar o seu site: ferramentas fáceis de usar, espaço de sobra e acessórios. http://br.geocities.yahoo.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] System error 53 has occurred
Your test take two missconf. 1. On samba server you must have: encrypt passwords = yes and domain logons = no and security=user in global conf 2. On W2K server you must have not domain only workgroup and you must log in as user with name and password identicall for samba smbpasswd -a used. I mean that tcpip on both work ok. Bye. - Original Message - From: Chai-Wang Chang To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:43 AM Subject: [Samba] System error 53 has occurred Dear Sir, I have been getting this error on the PC site when I tried to connect to the Samba server. I have Red Hat 8.0 installed and I am using Windows 2000 Server as client. I have tried all the steps listed in the DIAGNOSIS.txt and here are the results. Test 1, 2,3,4 passed. Test 5: I can only use IP but not PC Name. Test 6, 7 passed. Test 8: I got System error 53 has occurred. from PC. I did add server name to the lmhosts file and the result is still the same. Test 9: Failed. Same error as Test 8. Test 10: passed. Test 11: The samba server did appear in the File Manager. But, when I double click on the name, the same error as Test 8 appeared. I am looking for help and any suggestion to solve this problem. Your kindly response is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Best regards, Chai-Wang Chang
[Samba] Smbmount password interfaces
I'm the new maintainer of pam_mount, a PAM module that allows SMB (and other types of) volumes to be mounted for a user when he logs in using his system password. In the past, pam_mount has passed a volume password to smbmount using the -P parameter or PASSWD environment variable. This is not acceptable, as any user can learn other's passwords with some creative ps usage. However, smbmount does not currently allow a more secure means to enter passwords. Using a credentials file is not really appropriate for pam_mount either. Pam_mount needs to be able to get the system password from PAM and ship it off to smbmount somehow. A static password file does not really work nicely. Mount allows passwords to be read from stdin if the -p parameter is used: mount -p0 ... The number is the file descriptor to read the password from. Could you implement a similar option in smbmount? When the current version of smbmount prompts for a password, it tries to read it from /dev/tty. Allowing a user to tell smbmount to read its password from stdin would make smbmount more flexible in pipelines. -- Mike :wq -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] W32.Klez.E removal tools
WARNING!!! (from heimdall.inter.net.il) The following message attachments were flagged by the antivirus scanner: Attachment [2.2] install.exe, virus infected: W32/Klez-H. Action taken: deleted attachment: 65cars015[1].jpg
[Samba] error conecting from winxp to samba on tru64 or linux
Hello My name is Ronald Parthoens and I have problems with my samba. When connecting with my windows XP to my samba server (version 2.2.5)on Tru 64. I receive an error. That error I receive on every XP workstation that is in the company. I allready did the following winxp registry update. Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 ; ; This registry key is needed for a Windows XP Client to join ; and logon to a Samba domain. Note: Samba 2.2.3a contained ; this key in a broken format which did nothing to the registry - ; however XP reported registry key imported. If in doubt ; check the key by hand with regedit. [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters] requiresignorseal=dword: Do you know what I can also try to connect to my samba server. Thanks in advance Ronald Parthoens Belgium attachment: foutmelding samba.gif
Re: [Samba] Installing samba 2.2.6 on Mac OS 10.2.x
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 05:00:23AM -0800, Ian Roberts wrote: I am trying to install Samba 2.2.6 over the default installation of samba 2.2.3a that ships with Mac OS 10.2.1. I have tried to install this with the configure line from apple's guide to compiling samba http://www.opensource.apple.com/projects/documentation/ howto/html/osxsmb.html, but this was with a previous version of os 10. The configure line reads, ./configure --with-syslog --prefix=/etc/samba \ --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --libdir=/etc/samba --mandir=/usr/share/man This config line could not install samba, because there was a problem with cups, so I added- ./configure isn't for install the source package. The typical way ist ./configure ./make ./make install The last step must be as superuser/root/admin/bofh or else. --disable-cups to the config line. This should be ok, id you havn't cups on your maschine. -- Frank Matthieß[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: samba with redhat and act
Yes I get that. I am able to get it to work properly by giving complete world access to the file and folders, which means basically it has to be on a share by itself, or one that has complete rwxrwxrwx. I would of course prefer to have only group access but that doesn't work for this act database. I also turned off op locks. Don't know if that will cause any problems. but it made the file close properly when someone gets out of it. Tony McGrew www.multicam.com -Original Message- From: Kevin Brown [mailto:isp;dotgonepc.com] Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 11:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: samba with redhat and act I am having similar problems since moving from 2.0.7 samba. when you type in smbstatus do you get status codes that say: 0x3 and 0x1 kevin I have all my Novell stuff finally moved over to the samba server and most all of it is working. I have a problem with an act database though. Whenever I try to open it windows 2000 reports that it is locked by another user. I check the status and the files are not open at all so it should not be a locking issue. Other files (spreadsheets, docs etc..) all open fine. The system is RH7.3 with Samba 2.2.5 I have a bunch of engineers sharing solidworks files and they are having no problems, only act it appears. Any help will be appreciated. Tony McGrew www.multicam.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Does samba use NSS to find users/groups ?
sauron wrote: For this features i'm use nss_ldap from www.padl.com :) Yes, I know that. And actualy it works with other servises(ssh,ftp) just fine, but not with samba... (maybe just for me ?) :( -- Saulius -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] 2.2.6 and printer questions
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Thomas Bork wrote: Is it correct, that the automatic download of printer drivers is only possible for printers, which are associated with an printcap entry? When I'm uploading a postscript driver for a *virtuell* printer, which is not associated with an printcap entry and then making an automatic installation of the driver on w2k, the status of this printer is always Failure. The definition in smb.conf is: No. Any printer can have drivers associated with it. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9z8CbIR7qMdg1EfYRApPvAJ9XERToLG0lXTzqNTJ9ng/mk8STVwCglGYO TMHHKq64hrwr4iCG4Y4eM1A= =JTgf -END PGP SIGNATURE- Of course, but since the lpq command for a virtual printer don't give a successfull result - you get an error on the client for the status. My solution here was to set a special lpq command for the virtual printer, which always returned a successful result when asked. Eirik Thorsnes -- REAL Programmers never work 9 to 5. If any REAL Programmers are around at 9 AM, it's because they were up all night. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Roaming profiles problem - loading failure
I just came out of a meeting where we narrowed our version of this problem down to a particular build level (or two) of Win2K. NT appears to be fine, and so does XP. We're going to try a couple of different builds and hopefully get a level 10 log of a failing case. If anyone has any more information on this, I'd love to hear it, and if the Samba folks need any additional doc, speak now! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jra;dp.samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:29 PM To: Andrew Gaffney Cc: Peter Polkinghorne; Samba Subject: Re: [Samba] Roaming profiles problem - loading failure On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:48:42AM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote: I have been having this same problem. There is nothing in 2.2.6 that fixes it. I still have no idea what's causing it. Peter Polkinghorne wrote: I have a samba 2.2.4 PDC which acts as the repository of roaming profiles. Just recently some of our users have experienced failure to load roaming profiles. The clients are on a pair of Windows 2000 terminal servers. The failure does not seem to be confined to one server and only affects some people. The error given takes place during the loading profile stage: Windows can not copy: \\Samba server\profiles\aaa\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\FAVF.tmp to C:\Documents and Settings\aaa.KINGSFORDS\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\FAVF.tmp DETAIL - Access is denied More details please, a packet sniff or log file extract -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] problem with different user
Title: problem with different user Hi , I need to do my user_windows eng.processo to acess my unix solaris 2.x as user_unix cs02929. As like indicate, I create in global of file smb.conf the command: username map = /etc/smbusers and into the file /etc/smbuser, the command: cs02929 = eng.processo. This it don´t work. Please, what do I do to this work? Do I forgot anythink? thanks ...OLE_Obj... , Atenciosamente Alexandre Salomé Comau System _ Sistemas Engenharia tel: 0055 031 9944 8646 fax:0055 031 3529 6533
[Samba] ERROR: no seteuid method available
Hi, I´m installing samba in a new machine. RedHat-7.1 Kernel-2.4.19 (with ext2 acl-support) When I try: ./configure --without-swat --with-pam --with-ldapsam --with-quota --with-utm p --with-acl-support I get the following error: ... checking configure summary... WARNING: No automated network interface determination ERROR: no seteuid method available configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config I tried ./configure without parameter and in the old kernel 2.4.2-2 but I get the same error. I think I uninstalled some needed library. can some body help me please... TIA, Bruno -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] problem with different user
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 14:22, SALOME Alexandre wrote: Hi , I need to do my user_windows eng.processo to acess my unix solaris 2.x as user_unix cs02929. As like indicate, I create in global of file smb.conf the command: username map = /etc/smbusers and into the file /etc/smbuser, the command: cs02929 = eng.processo. This it don´t work. Please, what do I do to this work? Do I forgot anythink? did you try it without the quotes? username mapping works fine for me but my users don't have . in their names brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Manually adding Samba attributes from Perl
Hey all, I need to create a perl script that will add Samba attributes to existing LDAP accounts; basically, I just need to replicate what smbpasswd does in Perl. I've found a perl module that will create the password hashes for me, so that part's taken care of. The one thing I'm not sure how to do is generate the rid and PrimaryGroupID entries. Does anyone know how these are generated? I've thought of just looking at the existing entries and adding one to the highest each time; would that be acceptable? Thanks for any help you guys can provide! -- Nate Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Phone : (952)943-8700 http://www.real-time.com| Fax : (952)943-8500 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] PDF Creation
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 17:10, Duane Ellis wrote: I am not on the SAMBA list - so please if you reply remember to CC me. My Linux users have access to ps2pdf - a nice tool to convert Postscript files to PDF files.I'd like to make it available to my PC Users - who don't understand what a command line prompt is I know the following works: 1) On my Windows machine - Add a new printer an APPLE LASER POSTSCRIPT WRITER But specify it's output to be a FILE. 2) Print a document to the file. 3) Transfer it to my Linux box and run ps2pdf - works like a charm. So - why can't I do this with Samba (answer: I don't know samba well enough) a) Configure a printer under SAMBA b) Instead of going to a PRINT QUE the data should be piped through the program ps2pdf c) The output is a PDF file.. Normally Adobe PDF writer would put the result file some place on my Windows hard drive. d) I think the SAMBA print service knows the Windows USER NAME why can't SAMBA email the PDF file back to me. Sure - I don't get all those fancy features that Adobes PDF Writer gives me. I don't need them - nor do I want them, I never change the default settings anyway. For my users who really need that flexabilty - I'll purchase the full PDF Writer package. Or maybe - I could setup another PDF2MAIL script with the options they want or need in place. Should be nothing more then a 10 to 20 line shell script of some type and knowing where in side of samba to put it. I did try to search the samba site for info about this - but it is fruitless - do you knonw how many times the phrase pdf shows up... its a tough search since it finds all the docs... however the the list archive is a good place to look http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambaw=2r=1s=pdfq=b My idea is just a thought - and a wish. this already works - there is an example in the source ball /packaging/Mandrake/samba-print-pdf.sh you may want to use redmon and ghostscript on the local machine to avoid the mailing kludge. brad -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] PDF Creation
this already works - there is an example in the source ball Thank you. As with all things - ask and you shall receive Somebody out there has done just about everything already.. -Duane. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] How to join a linux machine to a Active Directory Domain using Samba.
Hi, having read through tons of different how-to's about how to do this specific task has made me quite sick. Do someone know a good guide for this or can she/he make a quick how-to? I am atm using samba 3.0 alpha 20 but I gladly change to 2.xx if that would do the trick. Anyone? regards, Jacob Malmberg _ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Manually adding Samba attributes from Perl
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 06:18, Nate Carlson wrote: Hey all, I need to create a perl script that will add Samba attributes to existing LDAP accounts; basically, I just need to replicate what smbpasswd does in Perl. I've found a perl module that will create the password hashes for me, so that part's taken care of. The one thing I'm not sure how to do is generate the rid and PrimaryGroupID entries. Does anyone know how these are generated? I've thought of just looking at the existing entries and adding one to the highest each time; would that be acceptable? Thanks for any help you guys can provide! Use 2*uid+1000 for users, 2*gid+1001 for groups. In Samba 3.0 you have more flexibility, but if you have any choice, stick to the algorithm. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Samba] samba browser problem!
Title: Message Hi Andrew, I have upgraded recently samba1.9 to samba2.2.5. At the weekend there was an unexpected shutdown, during that time samba machine upgraded itself to Master Browser, earlier it was an NT 4.0 machine. Now when I rebooted the NT machine, both NT machine and samba machine are considering themselves Master Browser. I want only NT to be master browser. How I can disable samba to act as Master Browser. Or if there is any other thing which i can do to diable samba acting as a Master Browser. Thanks, Rakhee Sood Techcomm Simulation Pty Ltd Ph. - 96903617 e-mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Samba] Forcing Password change from Win2k client
Not much help here, but it does work perfectly with LDAP backend (via pwdMustChange attribute). Sauro Saltini wrote: Hi, everybody. I've read many posts about forcing users to change their passwords at logon time from windows clients, but still I can't make it work. I've set up a Samba PDC with the latest stable version (2.2.6) of samba and configured it to do Unix password syncing through PAM. Then I've set up Unix passwords with the right aging parameters and all works fine in Unix (I've got logon messages about password expiration and I'm forced to change password after expiration time) From a Win2K client I can't get it work : - the account is enabled until password expiry and I have no kind of notification about the expiration of password - then a nice day the password really expires and, instead of been forced to change it, the user is simply LOCKED OUT (account disabled) Note that in UNIX the user is still active as I've set a long Interval beetwen pwd expiry and account locking ! The only functionality needed is a correct expiration / change-forcing behaviour from Win2K, so I don't want to use LDAP as i think Samba + PAM might be sufficient for this. It seems there's something wrong (or simply limited) with PAM - Samba interaction when managing account restrictions. So the final questions are : 1) Is it possible to make Samba force a password change request at client side during logon due to PAM account restrictions ? 2) If YES : where I've gone wrong ? 3) If NO : Is there a stable/production alternative for password expiry in Samba? Many thanks in advance. Sorry for my english. Sauro Saltini -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] problem with different user
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 12:25:55PM -0300, SALOME Alexandre wrote: and into the file /etc/smbuser, the command: cs02929 = eng.processo. Try it without the quotes around eng.processo. Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Switching to another Samba server
I've been running Samba 2.2.2 for a while as a domain controller on my mostly Windows network. It's been working great up to this point. Anyway, I just put together a new Linux server and installed 2.2.2 on it as well. I copied the conf file and pretty much mirrored everything on the existing server, changed the paths and the workgroup field in the conf file to match the new server, and ran the software. I'm able to join the domain, but when I attempt to login to it after rebooting, it says the domain is not available. And when I login to the Windows machine as the local Administrator and try to connect to the domain it says the server is not configured for transactions. The log file samba generated for that client's connection repeats attempts to access /root/tmp (I don't know why) and keeps saying that a password server is unavailable. Any ideas? Could the problem be some kind of conflict with the current server on the other machine? Until the new one is fully working I still have the old one running on the other computer. Admittedly, I don't know what every setting in the conf file does. So is it likely that, for certain fields, identical settings on both machines would cause some kind of conflict during a logon? David P. Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] First Call Computer Solutions -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Switching to another Samba server
David, Suggest you update to samba-2.2.6 or later (there will be an update later this week). The /root/tmp issue was a known problem with 2.2.2 and has been fixed. Best advice is to update to 2.2.6. If you then still have a problem, email me [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will try to assist. - John T. On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, David Donahue wrote: I've been running Samba 2.2.2 for a while as a domain controller on my mostly Windows network. It's been working great up to this point. Anyway, I just put together a new Linux server and installed 2.2.2 on it as well. I copied the conf file and pretty much mirrored everything on the existing server, changed the paths and the workgroup field in the conf file to match the new server, and ran the software. I'm able to join the domain, but when I attempt to login to it after rebooting, it says the domain is not available. And when I login to the Windows machine as the local Administrator and try to connect to the domain it says the server is not configured for transactions. The log file samba generated for that client's connection repeats attempts to access /root/tmp (I don't know why) and keeps saying that a password server is unavailable. Any ideas? Could the problem be some kind of conflict with the current server on the other machine? Until the new one is fully working I still have the old one running on the other computer. Admittedly, I don't know what every setting in the conf file does. So is it likely that, for certain fields, identical settings on both machines would cause some kind of conflict during a logon? David P. Donahue [EMAIL PROTECTED] First Call Computer Solutions -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can'T log on to samba server
Daniel, We love helping folks but we are not psychics. What version of samba? What OS platform? Did you build samba yourself? If so, how? If not, wher did you obtain the binary package? On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Daniel Levesque wrote: I need help with SAMBA. After editing the smb.conf file manually, after trying to edit the file with SWAT, after trying to setup SAMBA with webmin... Well, nothing works! i see the server icon from distant pc but i just can't logon From the server itself, i can go in a terminal and isue: smbclient -L localhost and i see the share, the master is the server itself, the workgroup is the good one. Looks like something IS working! So, do you have a firewall? What is in your smb.cofn file? From the client, i have a loggon screen but that's it... can't logon i've try to log with xp: nothing i've boot on W98 and it try to log on and i see that it tries on: serverSAMBA/IPC$ The IPC$ share is rather important - that's how when you browse a remote machine for shares it gets that information. is that the problem? Can't answer this, not enough information! What is in your samba log files? Should an anonymous login work, i also tried that but without success Servername\anonymous without psw again it doesn't work... Not the account anonymous unless you have created an account called 'anonymous'. Have you read The entire HOWTO collection link that is available from the SWAT home page? - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Switching to another Samba server
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 14:02, John H Terpstra wrote: David, Suggest you update to samba-2.2.6 or later (there will be an update later this week). The /root/tmp issue was a known problem with 2.2.2 and has been fixed. Best advice is to update to 2.2.6. If you then still have a problem, email me [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will try to assist. Was it fixed? My understanding was that the init scripts were fixed to unset TMPDIR, but that Samba itself wasn't changed. (This is also the quick fix, just 'export TMPDIR=/tmp' before smbd starts in your init scripts). This was a bug particularly evident on Linux Mandrake, due to their move to per-user TMPDIR stuff. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Samba] Printer driver downloads...?
Hi, See the Samba-HowTo-Collection Chapter 7. Ifloowed this and it works a charm for W2k. Mark On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 07:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been googling around for quite some time, and haven't managed to find anything useful. Is there some moderately up-to-date information on how to set up the automatic print-driver download in Samba 2.2.x? I know about the old way of doing things, but it doesn't seem to fly with Win2K drivers. Any and all help, and pointers to FD so I can RTFD (again, haven't had much luck with the standard docs) are appreciated! Thanks-in-advance! -- Don Werve [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Unix System Administrator) Yorn desh born, der ritt de gitt der gue, Orn desh, dee born desh, de umn bork! bork! bork! -- Mark Belfanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mentat IT -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] authentication problems
i am trying to set up a bunch of users on a freeBSD box with smb access to their home accounts from windows. I decided to use homes as the method to do this. everything is almost working i was able to edit the smb.conf with swat and the only problem is i can't get the password correct.. i added the users with smbpasswd -a user when i run testparm everything seems to check out ok with the smb.conf file is it possible that it is not authenticating? do i need to set a path for another password file? i am kinda stuck could someone give me some advice on what to try? thanks... b -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Which list for general help?
Hello, I am having enormous difficulty in getting samba to work correctly on the local network when the local network is on eth1. I have never had any trouble with samba when I used eth0... Here is my routing table... Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface 255.255.255.255 * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 eth1 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 default 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG1 00 eth0 This same computer works perfectly in every other area. eth0 is dedicated to the internet and masq's the network. findsmb can only see the local computer. I do not have an interfaces line in my smb.conf, and adding it apparently makes little difference. eg, without the line, it apparently defaults to eth0 With the line interfaces = eth1, the ip of the local computer changes, to the ip that eth1 uses, however, findsmb can still only see the local computer. The other computers on the network can't see this local... Any suggestions? I have recently subscribed, but since I haven't recieved any messages for the past 24 hours, I do not know if I subscribed correctly, hence, could you please 'cc' me? I do not mind having several copies of a reply... Thanks in advance! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Viewing Windows shared resources in Linux
Can samba view windows shared resources? Something like a network neighbourhood in KDE or Gnome? Is there a binary that can build a list or data structure of network resources that can be traversed? Michael Marriott -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Viewing Windows shared resources in Linux
Can samba view windows shared resources? Something like a network neighbourhood in KDE or Gnome? Is there a binary that can build a list or data structure of network resources that can be traversed? Komba is quite nice, haven't seen it recently, but was very impressed at the time, kind of like network neighborhood on steroids. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: Write down the migration document
At 15.55 09/11/2002 +0100, you wrote: If you're not in hurry wait for samba 3.0, otherwise you may use pwdum plus the utility richard sharpe has just released to change the SID in the profiles to have a smoother transition. I think I can wait (even if I'll try also the migration with samba 2.2.x). ;) But I would like to help you testing things out, so I would like to know what to try in Samba3.0alpha. this is the main reason I would like to find documentation about migration utilities in 3.0. So, if I would like to test net rpc vampire, what are the steps? I can guess: set up my winNT PDC and my lan, connect a linux box, use the command But my question is: to use vampire, the linux box must have joined the domain (as a standalone workstation, for example), or must be outside the windows network? Btw you cannot yet move only the PDC or the BDC to samba, it is an all or nothing situation Yes, I know this very well... I was thinking about these steps: migrate PDC, and,later, set up a BDC. Thank you very much! Tommaso dido Di Donato
Group Domain Users
Hi,
recently David Shapiro complained about getent group not working
in large domain groups, in particular Domain Users:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2002-November/040646.html
I was facing the same problem, which I found annoying because it
always blocks winbindd without producing anything, while applications
like ls just wanted to determine group names. Which occurs frequently,
because Domain Users has been selected as default primary group.
And it will hardly ever succeed, as large domains quickly exceed
buffer sizes provided by applications or libc for getgrgid()
or getgrgid_r().
Resolved the problem in my local version by modifying winbindd_group.c
such that domain groups Domain Users will never get members filled
in the result. This is somewhat anologous to the habit not to
list primary group members in /etc/group in order not to exceed
maximum group sizes on systems with many local users.
Not ideal, not elegant, but it happens to produce the desired result :)
In the attached patches I also disabled enumeration of domain
users and groups in winbindd_list_users() and winbindd_list_groups()
depending on parameters winbind enum users and winbind enum groups.
It's done the same way as in winbindd_setpwent() and winbindd_setgrent().
Reason: processing these requests take extremely long in our environment
(hours to days), while winbindd will block other requests. And it won't
stop when a user of, for example, wbinfo -u aborts his request by
killing wbinfo. You would need to kill winbindd and restart it for
domain users to be able to log on again.
Cheers!
Michael
Index: source/nsswitch/winbindd_group.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_group.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3.4.25
diff -u -r1.3.4.25 winbindd_group.c
--- source/nsswitch/winbindd_group.c14 Oct 2002 03:00:14 - 1.3.4.25
+++ source/nsswitch/winbindd_group.c11 Nov 2002 11:40:25 -
-77,6 +77,17
goto done;
}
+ /* Always skip members of Domain Users */
+
+ if (group_rid == DOMAIN_GROUP_RID_USERS) {
+ DEBUG(10, (skip enumerating members of %s\\Domain Users\n,
+ domain-name));
+ *gr_mem_len = 0;
+ *gr_mem = NULL;
+ result = True;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
/* Lookup group members */
status = domain-methods-lookup_groupmem(domain, mem_ctx, group_rid,
num_names,
rid_mem, names, name_types);
-690,6 +701,11
int extra_data_len = 0, i;
DEBUG(3, ([%5d]: list groups\n, state-pid));
+
+ /* Check user has enabled this */
+
+ if (!lp_winbind_enum_groups())
+ return WINBINDD_ERROR;
/* Enumerate over trusted domains */
Index: source/nsswitch/winbindd_user.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/nsswitch/winbindd_user.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3.4.17
diff -u -r1.3.4.17 winbindd_user.c
--- source/nsswitch/winbindd_user.c 14 Oct 2002 03:00:14 - 1.3.4.17
+++ source/nsswitch/winbindd_user.c 11 Nov 2002 11:41:11 -
-556,6 +556,11
DEBUG(3, ([%5d]: list users\n, state-pid));
+ /* Check user has enabled this */
+
+ if (!lp_winbind_enum_users())
+ return WINBINDD_ERROR;
+
if (!(mem_ctx = talloc_init_named(winbindd_list_users)))
return WINBINDD_ERROR;
nmbd stuff
Hi all,
I need help!!! why are there only 0.0.0.0 addresses???
(I modify nmbd a bit to make wrepld working)
here're the structs I use:
---
struct nmb_addr {
struct in_addr ip; /* address of the record */
time_t ttl; /* The time the record should be refreshed. */
struct in_addr owner; /* the adress of the wins server this
record comes from */
};
struct nmb_data {
uint16 nb_flags; /* Netbios flags. */
int wins_flags; /* similar to the netbios flags but
different ! */
struct in_addr owner; /* the adress of the wins server this
record comes from */
SMB_BIG_UINT id;/* unique id */
time_t ttl; /* The time the record must be removed (do not
remove if 0). */
time_t refresh_time;/* The time the record should be refreshed. */
int num_addrs; /* Number of ip_records entries. */
struct nmb_addr *addrs; /* The ip_record list for this name. */
};
/* This structure represents an entry in a local netbios name list. */
struct name_record {
ubi_trNodenode[1];
struct subnet_record *subnet;
enum name_source source; /* Where the name came from. */
struct nmb_name name;/* The netbios name. */
struct nmb_data data; /* address,... of the netbios name */
};
-
here the code that didn't work
struct nmb_record *namerec;
struct nmb_addr *addr_list;
...
/* Copy the IPs. */
namerec-data.num_addrs = num_addrs;
for(i=0;inum_addrs;i++) {
namerec-data.addrs[i] = addr_list[i];
/* namerec-data.addrs[i].ttl = addr_list[i].ttl;
namerec-data.addrs[i].owner = addr_list[i].owner;
namerec-data.addrs[i].ip = addr_list[i].ip;
*/ DEBUG(0,(NAME: %-19s OWNER: %s/%s IP: %s/%s %s\n,
nmb_namestr(namerec-name),
inet_ntoa(namerec-data.addrs[i].owner),
inet_ntoa(addr_list[i].owner),
inet_ntoa(namerec-data.addrs[i].ip),
inet_ntoa(addr_list[i].ip),
inet_ntoa(addr_list[0].ip)));
}
/* Data source. */
namerec-source = source;
/* Now add the record to the name list. */
update_name_in_namelist( subrec, namerec );
DEBUG( 3, ( add_name_to_subnet: Added netbios name %s with first IP %s \
ttl=%d nb_flags=%2x to subnet %s\n,
nmb_namestr( namerec-name ),
inet_ntoa( addr_list[0].ip ), /* here
it works !!! */
ttl,
(unsigned int)nb_flags,
subrec-subnet_name ) );
---
and here the logs:
[2002/11/11 14:48:59, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(243)
NAME: *00 OWNER: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 IP: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
[2002/11/11 14:48:59, 3] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(269)
add_name_to_subnet: Added netbios name *00 with first IP 192.168.0.250
ttl=0 nb_flags=60 to subnet WINS_SERVER_SUBNET
the right ip is 192.168.0.250
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Daily 3.0 and HEAD snapshots
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: Hi! I've written a simple script to produce daily snapshots of the 3.0 and HEAD branches. Available at: http://samba.org/~jelmer/snapshot/ All I ask is that people be good citizens and use bandwidth efficiently. no need to pulll the entire tarball if cvs update will work for you. Thanks. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard - http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team-- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE9z8ppIR7qMdg1EfYRAghHAKCx7SOZpUck7srKGwa2XN6+IemR0QCfawAg FniV1bOjGtc9l8pZe8uu7MI= =yki9 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
PANIC: failed to set gid on Jaguar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Is there something funky going on with the assert_gid function under Mac OS X 10.2.1? Anytime I try to pull a browse list from my 10.2.1 Samba server (2.2.6, configured as a PDC), from any Windows client, the client says that the network is not available, and I get the PANIC: failed to set gid error in log.smbd. [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(426) Selected protocol NT LM 0.12 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(433) negprot index=5 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(268) size=87 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(276) smb_tid=0 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=17 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[0]=5 (0x5) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[1]=12803 (0x3203) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[4]=65 (0x41) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[7]=47104 (0xB800) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[8]=18 (0x12) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[9]=63744 (0xF900) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[10]=227 (0xE3) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[11]=32768 (0x8000) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[12]=24303 (0x5EEF) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[13]=38212 (0x9544) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[14]=49801 (0xC289) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[15]=26625 (0x6801) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[16]=2049 (0x801) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(291) smb_bcc=18 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(518) write_socket(6,91) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(521) write_socket(6,91) wrote 91 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(877) got message type 0x0 of len 0x82 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(878) Transaction 2 of length 134 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(268) size=130 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=18439 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(276) smb_tid=0 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=64 smt_wct=13 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[0]=117 (0x75) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[1]=100 (0x64) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[2]=16644 (0x4104) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[3]=50 (0x32) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[5]=4792 (0x12B8) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[7]=1 (0x1) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[11]=212 (0xD4) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(291) smb_bcc=39 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 4792) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(328) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(216) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(857) Domain=[] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0] [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(868) sesssetupX:name=[] [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 6] param/loadparm.c:lp_file_list_changed(2297) lp_file_list_changed() file /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf - /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf last mod_time: Mon Nov 11 09:15:32 2002 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(296) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(285) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(328) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(111) Failed to set gid privileges to (0,205) now set to (205,205) uid=(0,0) [2002/11/11 09:16:11, 0]
Netbios name register bug on Samba 3.0 a20
Hi, On a samba-3.0-a20 machine, when the Netbios End-Node is configured as a B-node, i.e. it doesn't use the Wins to register the Netbios names but use the broadcast to do it, the domain group name (DomainName#1C) is not registered. So, if we have not the Wins server we'll have some problems?? Jianliang Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TieSse S.P.A.
Duplicate lock under FreeBSD 5.0 (-Current)
It seems a few people have seen this recently on -current Attached on -d10 log files of what happens after boot. FreeBSD outel.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Nov 7 05:13:19 PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/disk2/usr.src/sys/i386/compile/testGeneric.nonsmp i386 acquiring duplicate lock of same type: inp 1st inp @ ../../../netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290 2nd inp @ ../../../netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290 this comes up once right after I boot up. smb.tar.bz2 Description: Binary data
Please reply to unsubscribe from UG_Discussion
Hello, We have received a request from you to unsubscribe from the UG_Discussion group. Please confirm your request by replying to this message. If you do not wish to unsubscribe from UG_Discussion, please ignore this message. Regards, Yahoo! Groups Customer Care Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: Group Domain Users
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:40:25PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote: recently David Shapiro complained about getent group not working in large domain groups, in particular Domain Users: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/2002-November/040646.html Resolved the problem in my local version by modifying winbindd_group.c such that domain groups Domain Users will never get members filled in the result. This is somewhat anologous to the habit not to list primary group members in /etc/group in order not to exceed maximum group sizes on systems with many local users. I think this would be a candidate for Yet Another New Parameter. We could either have a parameter to explicitly disable the Domain Users group, or maybe some generic filtering mechanism where you can specify group names or rids not to resolve. Looking at it perhaps the second option seems a bit complicated. In the attached patches I also disabled enumeration of domain users and groups in winbindd_list_users() and winbindd_list_groups() depending on parameters winbind enum users and winbind enum groups. It's done the same way as in winbindd_setpwent() and winbindd_setgrent(). The winbind enum users/groups parameter deliberately doesn't stop wbinfo from listing the groups so there is at least one way to enumerate users and groups. The fact that a client disconnecting doesn't stop winbindd is a bug in winbindd but I think it will be hard to fix properly. Tim.
FW: Segfault with net ads password
Title: Message
Hi
All,
I'm
still having the issues I've described below. I've tried to give as much detail
as possible, and I'm hoping to help fix this segfault bug in what will become
Samba 3. I don't believe that this problem is isolated to me and I do believe
that it does affect every other user. Please help me and allow me to help the
Samba project.
Thanks,
James
Willard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James
WillardSent: Friday, November 01, 2002 6:04 PMTo: 'Esh,
Andrew'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Segfault with "net
ads password"
Andrew,
It
seems like you're right about the null pointer. Given the code block you
mentioned, I rebuilt with --enable-krb5developer and ran gdb over it again
with a breakpoint at net_ads_password() anddisplaying ads, ads-auth,
and ads-auth.kdc_server. The following is the output from gdb at the line
justbefore line 885 where kerberos_set_password() is
called:
3: ads-auth = {realm = 0x0,
password = 0x0, user_name = 0x0, kdc_server = 0x0, flags = 0, time_offset =
0}2: ads-auth.kdc_server
= 0x01: ads = (ADS_STRUCT *) 0x81af8e0
And
of course, the call itself... null values and all... (usernames/passwords
substituted)
(gdb)
kerberos_set_password (kpasswd_server=0x0, auth_principal=0x815c560 [EMAIL PROTECTED],
auth_password=0x815c57c "Adminpass", target_principal=0xbbe5 [EMAIL PROTECTED],
new_password=0x81535a0 "User",
time_offset=0) at
libads/krb5_setpw.c:470470
return krb5_set_password(kpasswd_server, target_principal, new_password,
time_offset);
Ok, this officially goes beyond my abilities... who
maintains the "net ads" portion of Samba that could help me look into this
further?
Thanks,
James Willard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From: Esh, Andrew
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 4:54
PMTo: 'James Willard';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Segfault with "net ads
password"Importance: High
Looks like this bit of code is failing:
utils/net_ads.c, lines 877-886, function
"net_ads_password"
/* use the realm so we can eventually
change passwords for users in
realms other than default */ if
(!(ads = ads_init(realm, NULL, NULL))) return -1;
asprintf(prompt, "Enter new password
for %s:", argv[0]);
new_password = getpass(prompt);
ret =
kerberos_set_password(ads-auth.kdc_server, auth_principal,
auth_password,
argv[0], new_password, ads-auth.time_offset);
the last line is reached with "ads-auth.kdc_server" as a
bad (null?) pointer. The "ads_init" function creates the ads structure
and zeroes it. It doesn't appear to me as though "ads_init" initializes
ads-auth, and I don't see where else it gets set.
-Original Message- From:
James Willard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE:
Segfault with "net ads password"
And as a follow-up to myself... The following is a backtrace
from gdb:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x080ec329 in interpret_addr () (gdb) bt #0 0x080ec329 in
interpret_addr () #1 0x080ec462 in
interpret_addr2 () #2 0x080efbe0 in
open_udp_socket () #3 0x0810f56c in
krb5_set_password () #4 0x0810fdbf in
kerberos_set_password () #5 0x0806b17c in
net_ads_password () #6 0x08068690 in
net_run_function () #7 0x0806b51c in net_ads
() #8 0x08068690 in net_run_function ()
#9 0x080697d3 in main () #10
0x42017589 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
Thanks,
James Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message- From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of James Willard Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:12 PM To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Segfault with
"net ads password"
Hi,
I'm trying to troubleshoot a problem I've been having for
the past several weeks with "net ads password"
attempting to change a users' password. I'm using
the Samba 3.0 CVS tree updated this morning (even though there has been no difference in behavior in the past month
or so). I'm running:
net ads password [EMAIL PROTECTED] -U
[EMAIL PROTECTED]%Password
I receive a prompt:
Enter new password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I enter a password and then it segfaults. Below are excerpts
from a strace:
... write(3, "kadmin",
6)
= 6 write(3, "\0\0\0\10",
4)
= 4 write(3, "changepw",
8)
= 8 ... write(3, "\0\0\0\0",
4)
= 4 write(3, NULL,
0)
= 0 fcntl64(3, F_SETLKW, {type=F_UNLCK,
whence=SEEK_SET, start=0, len=0}) = 0
close(3)
= 0 time(NULL)
= 1036176903
You have been unsubscribed from UG_Discussion
Hello, This is to inform you that your request to unsubscribe from UG_Discussion has been completed. Regards, Yahoo! Groups Customer Care Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: Smbmount password interfaces
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, W. Michael Petullo wrote: Could you implement a similar option in smbmount? When the current version of smbmount prompts for a password, it tries to read it from /dev/tty. Allowing a user to tell smbmount to read its password from stdin would make smbmount more flexible in pipelines. You should be able to set PASSWD_FD to a file descriptor to read the password from. (see source/client/smbmount.c:get_password_file) Not that I have a problem with adding 'passwordfd=0' if that makes it any easier for you. /Urban
Re: FW: Segfault with net ads password
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 05:48, James Willard wrote: Hi All, I'm still having the issues I've described below. I've tried to give as much detail as possible, and I'm hoping to help fix this segfault bug in what will become Samba 3. I don't believe that this problem is isolated to me and I do believe that it does affect every other user. Please help me and allow me to help the Samba project. Yes, it's a real bug, and I can see exactly how it occurs. The problem is figuring out how to fix it... (The auto-find-dc code currently does LDAP stuff, which this code explicitly avoids). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ldap_nua requires guest exist and have rid 501?
Is that statement true? if so why? I've just tried an upgrade to 3.0a20 and domain logons stopped working for me. a downgrade restores functionality im using passdb backend = ldapsam_nua:ldap://.../ and i have this line in my smbusers file nobody = guest pcguest smbguest does this have something to do with this? - Always make guest rid 501 (abartlet) brad
Re: ldap_nua requires guest exist and have rid 501?
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 10:59, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote: Is that statement true? Yes, or also use the unixsam backend if so why? Because the Guest account is a 'well known' account, and as such should have a fixed RID. This is enforced via the passdb backend because to do otherwise would have nasty consequences when mapping back and forth between uids and RIDs. (We are working hard to ensure that there is only one point at which uids and RIDs are mapped, and currently this is in the passdb.) Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: ldap_nua requires guest exist and have rid 501?
Andrew Bartlett wrote: Because the Guest account is a 'well known' account, and as such should have a fixed RID. This is enforced via the passdb backend because to do otherwise would have nasty consequences when mapping back and forth between uids and RIDs. (We are working hard to ensure that there is only one point at which uids and RIDs are mapped, and currently this is in the passdb.) On a related note, does SAMBA still use the guest account in place of the (unkown) internal user for enumerating shares? An NT client can not browse a SAMBA server with the guest account disabled, but having a guest account enabled is not required on an NT account to do the same thing. -John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only
Re: ldap_nua requires guest exist and have rid 501?
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 13:16, John E. Malmberg wrote: Andrew Bartlett wrote: Because the Guest account is a 'well known' account, and as such should have a fixed RID. This is enforced via the passdb backend because to do otherwise would have nasty consequences when mapping back and forth between uids and RIDs. (We are working hard to ensure that there is only one point at which uids and RIDs are mapped, and currently this is in the passdb.) On a related note, does SAMBA still use the guest account in place of the (unkown) internal user for enumerating shares? An NT client can not browse a SAMBA server with the guest account disabled, but having a guest account enabled is not required on an NT account to do the same thing. A Samba server must have a guest account, and (now) it must have RID 501. I'm not sure the guest account is 'disabled' on NT, it is just that the groups it is given membership of changes. IE on NT, the restrictanonymous setting can remove 'guest' from domain users, and 'everyone'. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Can't access to Domain!!
Dear i've provided samba for act ass PDC and itz work as well for now,i don't know what i did it wrong. some user can log on from windows 98 SE such ass user:root but the another userscan't logon from that machine.it'll give error message as "the share name was not found. besure you typed it correctly" What should ido. this problem had happended since i've use Webmin-1.020-1 on RH7.2 and i've changeda severalconfigure. Maybe this is problem?? Best regards werachat Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive medley & videos from Greatest Hits CD
Re: ldap_nua requires guest exist and have rid 501?
Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 13:16, John E. Malmberg wrote: On a related note, does SAMBA still use the guest account in place of the (unkown) internal user for enumerating shares? An NT client can not browse a SAMBA server with the guest account disabled, but having a guest account enabled is not required on an NT account to do the same thing. A Samba server must have a guest account, and (now) it must have RID 501. I'm not sure the guest account is 'disabled' on NT, it is just that the groups it is given membership of changes. IE on NT, the restrictanonymous setting can remove 'guest' from domain users, and 'everyone'. The GUEST account can definitely be disabled on an NT workstation. You can not access shares through it when it is disabled, yet browsing works. You can enable it and then access shares through the guest account. SAMBA should work the same way, but does not. This puts a minor security hole in SAMBA that is not present in Microsoft Windows NT. Microsoft advises that the guest account be disabled if you are concerned about security, and on NT Servers it is disabled by default. -John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only
Re: ldap_nua requires guest exist and have rid 501?
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 14:48, John E. Malmberg wrote: Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 13:16, John E. Malmberg wrote: On a related note, does SAMBA still use the guest account in place of the (unkown) internal user for enumerating shares? An NT client can not browse a SAMBA server with the guest account disabled, but having a guest account enabled is not required on an NT account to do the same thing. A Samba server must have a guest account, and (now) it must have RID 501. I'm not sure the guest account is 'disabled' on NT, it is just that the groups it is given membership of changes. IE on NT, the restrictanonymous setting can remove 'guest' from domain users, and 'everyone'. The GUEST account can definitely be disabled on an NT workstation. You can not access shares through it when it is disabled, yet browsing works. My point is that they do this by fiddling group membership. The by disabling password access to that account, it is no longer a member of the authenticated users group, or something similar. This then fails certain NT ACL checks. The account certainly still exists, and is used even on NT servers. A *lot* of NT domain operations occur as guest. You can enable it and then access shares through the guest account. SAMBA should work the same way, but does not. This puts a minor security hole in SAMBA that is not present in Microsoft Windows NT. As far as I know, we have the same defaults as NT. We do not offer shares to guest by default. Taking this further, MS implemented 'restrict anonymous' which removed further groups form the 'guest' account, making even connecting to IPC$ impossible at RestrictAnonymous=2 (I believe). We implement 'restrict anonymous =1' as a smb.conf setting in Samba 3.0. Microsoft advises that the guest account be disabled if you are concerned about security, and on NT Servers it is disabled by default. In Samba, access by the guest user is determined per-share, so I'm not sure exactly what you mean here. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Group Domain Users
Tim Potter wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:40:25PM +0100, Michael Steffens wrote: The winbind enum users/groups parameter deliberately doesn't stop wbinfo from listing the groups so there is at least one way to enumerate users and groups. Yes, but specifically in an environment where domains are very large, with many trust relationships, and with domain controllers being distributed all over the world, benefits of this possibilty doesn't outweigh the costs any more. The fact that a client disconnecting doesn't stop winbindd is a bug in winbindd but I think it will be hard to fix properly. With excessively long queries being disabled it isn't that dramatic for me. BTW: I love Winbind! :))
Re: ldap_nua requires guest exist and have rid 501?
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 16:10, John E. Malmberg wrote: Andrew Bartlett wrote: In Samba, access by the guest user is determined per-share, so I'm not sure exactly what you mean here. The NT behavior is that if the guest account is enabled, than if any shares have the everyone group associated with them, then the shares can be accessed from any LANMAN client on the network. The security log will log that the guest account was used to access the account. And the everyone group includes anyone on the network, not just the workgroup or the domain. If you set the disable flag for the guest account, then none of the shares will be accessable unless the user belongs to a group that is otherwise allowed access to the share. The execption is getting the browse list. This still works even if the guest account is disabled. And the security log does not register this as a guest access. The exception is much more than that - all sorts of things go over IPC$, and they are protected by their individual ACLs. Enumerating users, all sorts of things. Domain logons are a particular thing that occour initially as guest (pipe-level authentication is done on netlogon, likewise password changes are as guest). This has bitten several OpenVMS users as they disable or do not create guest account because they do not plan to allow everyone on to access their shares. It has turned out to be one of the causes of the most common problems reported. Having the SAMBA guest account have different visible functionality than what is the visible behavior of Windows NT is going to be a continuing source of confusion. As far as I can tell, it is quite consistent actually. It would be better to have a different name for the internal uses that are not directly visible, and have the guest account just be used for guest access. More politically correct and accurate. There are many sites that have security standards that prohibit a guest account from being enabled. So what does 'ident' or 'echo' or 'time' run as? That is the point of the guest account, Samba needs a user to become, an unprivileged user that cannot break the entire system if Samba were to accidentally allow file access, for example. So you propose having 2 accounts? We have the 'guest ok' parameter, NT ACLs and the 'restrict anonymous' parameter for controlling thing kind of thing, I think adding an new smb.conf option would just break every site out there! On most other systems, we use the 'nobody' account, which already exists and requires no further configuration. The default configuration for 3.0 has a 'unixsam' backend, which maps this to the 501 rid. So by default, this looks exactly like NT. So while it may be technically correct that the NT GUEST account is used for some functions based on observations, the practice is not consistent with what Microsoft has been telling NT Administrators. It is consistent with what occurs on the wire, and really, that's the best we can do. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
CVS update: samba/source/include
Date: Mon Nov 11 09:01:24 2002 Author: idra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/include In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29424/include Modified Files: gums.h Log Message: union is better to avoid problems with pointers Revisions: gums.h 1.1 = 1.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/include/gums.h?r1=1.1r2=1.2
CVS update: samba/docs/docbook/faq
Date: Mon Nov 11 13:29:46 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/docbook/faq In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9836/faq Modified Files: errors.sgml Log Message: Add note about error that happens when the loopback device doesn't work Revisions: errors.sgml 1.3 = 1.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/docbook/faq/errors.sgml?r1=1.3r2=1.4
CVS update: samba/examples/pdb/mysql
Date: Mon Nov 11 13:49:25 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/examples/pdb/mysql In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10828/examples/pdb/mysql Modified Files: mysql.dump Log Message: Fix typo Revisions: mysql.dump 1.1 = 1.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/examples/pdb/mysql/mysql.dump?r1=1.1r2=1.2
CVS update: samba/examples/pdb/mysql
Date: Mon Nov 11 13:49:39 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/examples/pdb/mysql In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11342/examples/pdb/mysql Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 mysql.dump Log Message: Fix typo Revisions: mysql.dump 1.1.2.1 = 1.1.2.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/examples/pdb/mysql/mysql.dump?r1=1.1.2.1r2=1.1.2.2
CVS update: samba/source/rpcclient
Date: Mon Nov 11 15:41:04 2002 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/rpcclient In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23440 Modified Files: cmd_spoolss.c Log Message: Add getdata and getdataex commands Revisions: cmd_spoolss.c 1.96 = 1.97 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpcclient/cmd_spoolss.c?r1=1.96r2=1.97
CVS update: samba/source/rpcclient
Date: Mon Nov 11 15:43:09 2002 Author: jmcd Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/rpcclient In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23713 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 cmd_spoolss.c Log Message: Add getdata and getdataex commands Revisions: cmd_spoolss.c 1.82.2.9 = 1.82.2.10 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpcclient/cmd_spoolss.c?r1=1.82.2.9r2=1.82.2.10
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Mon Nov 11 18:41:28 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6713/passdb Modified Files: pdb_mysql.c Log Message: Add extra debug info Revisions: pdb_mysql.c 1.5 = 1.6 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_mysql.c?r1=1.5r2=1.6
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Mon Nov 11 18:42:13 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv7062 Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 pdb_mysql.c Log Message: Add more debug info Revisions: pdb_mysql.c 1.4.2.2 = 1.4.2.3 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_mysql.c?r1=1.4.2.2r2=1.4.2.3
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Mon Nov 11 18:53:23 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8370/passdb Modified Files: pdb_mysql.c Log Message: More improvement of DEBUG output Revisions: pdb_mysql.c 1.6 = 1.7 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_mysql.c?r1=1.6r2=1.7
CVS update: samba/source/passdb
Date: Mon Nov 11 18:54:13 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source/passdb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8398/source/passdb Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 pdb_mysql.c Log Message: Improve DEBUG output somewhat more Revisions: pdb_mysql.c 1.4.2.3 = 1.4.2.4 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/passdb/pdb_mysql.c?r1=1.4.2.3r2=1.4.2.4
CVS update: samba/docs/docbook/projdoc
Date: Mon Nov 11 19:20:23 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/docbook/projdoc In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10785 Modified Files: pdb_mysql.sgml Log Message: fix typo(s/plaintext pass column/plain pass column/) Revisions: pdb_mysql.sgml 1.1 = 1.2 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/docs/docbook/projdoc/pdb_mysql.sgml?r1=1.1r2=1.2
Re: CVS update: samba/source/passdb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Make smbpasswd use the group mapping, and fix spelling in ldapsam. Ouch... Thanks! Did I say I did compile this? Volker -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Key-ID D32186CF, Fingerprint available: phone +49 551 370 iD8DBQE90CE9OmSXH9Mhhs8RAqMgAJoCD18KsBJttu+Q1GpsOK/SmDKSxwCcCA4t 1++vZDEUoCWskgMiaqCfFGs= =73p8 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: CVS update: samba/source/passdb
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 08:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Make smbpasswd use the group mapping, and fix spelling in ldapsam. Ouch... Thanks! Did I say I did compile this? It worked fine, because all the references were misspelled :-) Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Mon Nov 11 22:02:01 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23613/rpc_server Modified Files: Tag: APPLIANCE_HEAD srv_spoolss_nt.c Log Message: fix for CR 601. Only call addprinter command when the port, driver, comment, or location field changed Revisions: srv_spoolss_nt.c1.95.2.221 = 1.95.2.222 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c?r1=1.95.2.221r2=1.95.2.222
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Mon Nov 11 22:05:05 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24174/rpc_server Modified Files: srv_spoolss_nt.c Log Message: fix for CR 601. Only call addprinter command when the port, driver, comment, or location field changed Revisions: srv_spoolss_nt.c1.360 = 1.361 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c?r1=1.360r2=1.361
CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server
Date: Mon Nov 11 22:05:33 2002 Author: jerry Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24252/rpc_server Modified Files: Tag: SAMBA_3_0 srv_spoolss_nt.c Log Message: fix for CR 601. Only call addprinter command when the port, driver, comment, or location field changed Revisions: srv_spoolss_nt.c1.277.2.20 = 1.277.2.21 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c?r1=1.277.2.20r2=1.277.2.21
CVS update: samba/source/lib
Date: Mon Nov 11 22:12:48 2002 Author: jra Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/lib In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv24915/lib Modified Files: charcnv.c Log Message: Fix all returns to be size_t (they are all unsigned). Fixup strlen being done on ucs2 strings. Jeremy. Revisions: charcnv.c 1.65 = 1.66 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/lib/charcnv.c?r1=1.65r2=1.66
