[Samba] mapping accountnames and SID's error in winxp sp1
Hi all, I am trying to set up a samba pdc with several win95 and winxp sp1 pc's connecting to it. I've used the samba-ldap-pdc howto with samba 2.2.7 and as far as i know i am all settled. Still i get a message when really connecting to the domain instead of shares from winxp (no problems in win95) that tells me that it can't map the accountnames to the security-id's or something like it (I had to translate it from dutch to english). Authentication is ok, I can access shares in xp (can this be turned off as in domain logon only, or will I get problems with win95 then?), but when i try to do domain logons I get the previously mentioned message. Seems like I have missed a step. Had done the registry editing signorseal and have set up groups in ldap and they're working in linux. I have assigned the users to the group: Domain Users still it ain't working. Where did i get stupid (probably 27 years ago or something :))? Thanks in advance Bas -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with creating machine account for domain logon
Title: Problem with creating machine account for domain logon Hi, If i try to let my laptop logon to my samba domain i see in the logfiles that there must me a machine account in the /etc/passwd file. So i created manualy useradd machine$ This works fine and i'm able to log on to the domain. Why doesn't create samba this machine account automaticly?? do u need a special option for that?? greetz, Ernst Cozijnsen -- This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst Young Group. It is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
RE: [Samba] libnss on solaris
Hello,
have you ever made nss_wins work on solaris ?
No. But others have. This WINS support library was built on Solaris.
could you please give me a contact to such a person ?
from nsswitch/README: This extension provides a wins module for NSS on glibc2/Linux.
Make sure that you rename nss_wins.so to libnss_wins.so and
set links
accordingly.
I did, as I wrote in previous email.
Also, please check Solaris documentation to find how to
bind dynamic link
libaries so that solaris can find them. Do you have an
/etc/ld.so.conf
file? Maybe it is in /etc/system.{cnf,conf}. I used to run
Solaris X86 and
vaguely remember a file like it.
i checked the docs and without any tweaking libraries are searched
for in /usr/lib. you can change it with crle command, but in this case
i dont think it needs any changes.
Also, what happens it you have in your /etc/nsswitch.conf?
hosts: wins dns file, ie: wins first.
i tried even hosts: wins only, with no luck :(
Please show command failure output.
bash-2.05# ping cww
ping: unknown host cww
i have also ran snoop (sun's network sniffer) and if i do a ping
i cant see any broadcasts nor wins traffic... so i guess
that nss library is not even touched :(
how can i debug it ? truss doesnt show anything useful :|
i need it badly,
terry
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] system error 64, win xp and samba
Just so that it gets into the archives for future googlers: If you get 'system error 64' on a windows xp machine trying to connect to samba, then make sure you have nothing running on port 445. I had an apache ssl instance running on that port. Doh! Had to scratch my head a bit over it. XP doesn't actually need anything to be on 445, it just gets confused and gives up if there is. Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem with creating machine account for domain logon
Title: Problem with creating machine account for domain logon Hi, If i try to let my laptop logon to my samba domain i see in the logfiles that there must me a machine account in the /etc/passwd file. So i created manualy useradd machine$ This works fine and i'm able to log on to the domain. Why doesn't create samba this machine account automaticly?? do u need a special option for that?? greetz, Ernst Cozijnsen -- This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst Young Group. It is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
[Samba] Problem authenticating against a W2K server
Hi there. I'm having a problem letting a Samba server (MYSAMBA) authenticate users (using security = domain and a password server = MYPDC) against a Windows 2000 PDC (MYPDC). The Windows 2000 machine seems (I'm not 100% sure about this) to be configured to restrict anonymous and it seems to me that this is where the problem lies but don't know what to do. I joined the MYDOMAIN domain by first confirming that MYSAMBA was not already a member of the domain. Then I issued the following command: smbpasswd -j MYDOMAIN -r MYPDC -U Administrator And the Windows administrator typed in the password. The command responded that I had joined the domain and a secrets.tdb file got created in the /etc/samba directory. We confirmed on the Windows side that the machine was now a member of the domain. So.. anyone have some pointers for me? Below are some more information about my setup and the errors I get. Hope it's not too much or too irrelevant. :-) This is what I get if I try to connect to a share on MYSAMBA from a Linux client (MYCLIENT): [username@MYCLIENT]$ smbclient //MYSAMBA/tmp -U username -W MYDOMAIN added interface ip=10.10.20.42 bcast=10.10.20.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password:- Here I typed in the password, not empty password session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE [username@MYCLIENT]$ And I get this in the /var/log/samba/10.10.20.42.log file: [2002/11/28 09:39:53, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1335) connect_to_domain_password_server: machine MYPDC rejected the tconX on the IPC$ share. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. [2002/11/28 09:39:53, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1599) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2002/11/28 09:39:53, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwnam(1369) unable to open passdb database. [2002/11/28 09:39:53, 0] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:pdb_getsampwnam(1369) unable to open passdb database. The Windows administrators can't see anything in the logs on MYPDC but I've confirmed using tcpdump that there is a dialogue between MYSAMBA and MYPDC. Here are also some commands I use to test connections from MYSAMBA to MYPDC: [root@MYSAMBA]# smbclient -L MYPDC added interface ip=10.10.10.90 bcast=10.10.10.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=10.10.10.91 bcast=10.10.10.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: -- Just type Enter (emtpy password) Anonymous login successful Domain=[MYDOMAIN] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [root@MYSAMBA]# smbclient //MYPDC/ipc\$ added interface ip=10.10.10.90 bcast=10.10.10.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=10.10.10.91 bcast=10.10.10.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password:-- Just type Enter (emtpy password) Anonymous login successful Domain=[MYDOMAIN] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED [root@MYSAMBA]# smbclient //MYPDC/ipc\$ -U username added interface ip=10.10.10.90 bcast=10.10.10.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=10.10.10.91 bcast=10.10.10.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: -- Type the password of the user username Domain=[MYDOMAIN] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] smb: \ ls NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \* 0 blocks of size 0. 0 blocks available smb: \ quit [root@mars samba]# Here are my globals from smb.conf: [global] workgroup = MYDOMAIN netbios name = MYSAMBA server string = Samba Print Server security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = MYPDC syslog only = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/%I.log max log size = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 dns proxy = No name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast host local master = no remote announce = 10.10.10.255 10.10.20.255 hosts allow = 127. 10.10.10. 10.10.20. printing = lprng Best regards, Ingimar -- Ingimar Robertsson, Systems Administrator EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skyrr Ltd, Iceland Information Management TEL: +354-5695100 Armuli 2, 108 Reykjavik, ICELANDFAX: +354-5695128 http://www.skyrr.is/legal/disclaimer.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cups
Can anyone advise how to get Cups to survive a reboot with samba. After Reboot both samba and cups are running but there are no samba preinters unless I restart Samba. I have set links to rc3.d so that cups starts before samba but still doesnt work. Any help would be greatly appreceiated Regards Simon - This mail sent through IMP on Redhat 8.0 and Qmail with Ldap. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] how to use policy files with samba (NT/w2k)
Hi, I have set up samba as a PDC with OPenLDAP. I would like to have the users have some policys enforced. I read some things about *.adm files but do not know how to create or use them. Especially there is a system.adm which could be very valuable in creating network-wide policys. But where do I put them? In the profile path of all users? Are there any documents describing the possibilitys I have (written for a windows novice)? Thanks, Malte Mueller -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba server for windows (I know it defeats the object...)
Title: samba server for windows (I know it defeats the object...) Hi, is there a samba server for windows that UNIX samba clients can access. I know this wouldn't make sense and windows mounting a unix SMB exported directory would make so much more sense but a colleague swears that a windows samba server exists and it is proving hard to demonstrate its absence! Dave DISCLAIMER The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is intended for the recipient only. If you have received it in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any other purposes, or disclose the content of the e-mail to any other person or store or copy the information in any medium. The views contained in this e-mail are those of the author and not necessarily those of GEHE Group companies.
Re: [Samba] Problem authenticating against a W2K server
- Original Message - From: Ingimar Robertsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 10:00 AM Subject: [Samba] Problem authenticating against a W2K server Hi there. I'm having a problem letting a Samba server (MYSAMBA) authenticate users (using security = domain and a password server = MYPDC) against a Windows 2000 PDC (MYPDC). The Windows 2000 machine seems (I'm not 100% snip Add the machine to the domain on the Win2k PDC using AD. Then smbpasswd -j DOMAINNAME -r PDCIP -U Administrator%password Then wbinfo -A Administrator%password Then it should work fine. I'm kinda getting tired of this, can't we redo the docs for Winbind LOL Shaolin - IT Systems WB Ltd. .: http://www.security-forums.com :. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: AW: [Samba] attrib +R myowndir fails to write-protect my own dir
On November 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: actually a second attempt at drawing your attention to the fact that compliance with M$ quirks and kinks is not something to be ashamed of but rather reason to be proud. I think you'll find that the Samba team are quite familiar with this opinion, especially in the context of the Samba TNG fork :) Waider. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me. kate says, no, there's a lot of red in heliotrope. kate says, we're talking like #993366 or so -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Problem authenticating against a W2K server
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:30:17AM -, Gareth Davies wrote: From: Ingimar Robertsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm having a problem letting a Samba server (MYSAMBA) authenticate users (using security = domain and a password server = MYPDC) against a Windows 2000 PDC (MYPDC). The Windows 2000 machine seems (I'm not 100% snip Add the machine to the domain on the Win2k PDC using AD. Then smbpasswd -j DOMAINNAME -r PDCIP -U Administrator%password Then wbinfo -A Administrator%password Then it should work fine. I'm kinda getting tired of this, can't we redo the docs for Winbind LOL I agree. I had already stumbled upon this -A switch to wbinfo and then read the winbindd man file and it states: winbindd is a daemon that provides a service for the Name Service Switch capability that is present in most modern C libraries. This sounded to far from what I was trying to do. :-) I'll try setting up the winbindd and using wbinfo -A. Thanks for the help! Best regards, Ingimar -- Ingimar Robertsson, Systems Administrator EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skyrr Ltd, Iceland Information Management TEL: +354-5695100 Armuli 2, 108 Reykjavik, ICELANDFAX: +354-5695128 http://www.skyrr.is/legal/disclaimer.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba3.0Alpha21- error on logging in to KDC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have just downloaded and tested with the Samba3.0 Alpha21 Release. I want to try to create the server account in the active directory, however, when I logged in to the KDC by /usr/kerberos/bin/kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED], but error returned as KDC has no support for encryptions type while getting the initial credentials , then I can't go on for creating the acount. Make sure that default_tkt_enctypes = des-cbc-md5 des-cbc-crc is set in /etc/krb5.conf cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE95gSQIR7qMdg1EfYRAu9oAJ4zXBuHiT7+yTpKavfgbf9hTCXD5ACcCTh9 boGFXzwXAalRqQuui9hLsuk= =ypQB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] CUPS cancel print problem
Strange problem here, whenever a job is selected by the user to delete, it
disappears from the print queue visible from Windows (after press F5), but
still remains in the cups queue.
I've seen some mention of using disable spoolss, to fix problems like this,
however, we have the printer drivers on the samba box.
The configuration below is from our sandbox server, sandbox. The domain
master is a Samba server. The sandbox is runing SuSE 8.1, CUPS 1.1.15 and
Samba 2.2.6
This also happens on our production server SuSE 7.3 CUPS 1.1.15 and Samba 2.26
Thanks,
Paul
[global]
workgroup = MODUS
netbios name = sandbox
server string = IT Test server
os level = 32
time server = yes
unix extensions = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
log level = 1
syslog = 0
printing = CUPS
printcap name = CUPS
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
wins support = no
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/
map to guest = Bad User
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Re-enter*new*password* %n\n
*Password*changed*
unix password sync = Yes
preferred master = no
domain master = no
security = domain
password server = *
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
browseable = no
writeable = yes
create mask = 0640
directory mask = 0750
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/tmp
printable = yes
create mask = 0600
browseable = no
[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /var/lib/samba/drivers
write list = @ntadmin root
force group = ntadmin
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Cups
Perhaps you are using an older version of cups (1.1.15 or earlier). In this versions the daemon puts itself to background before having loaded all printers (including ppds, filters...). This leads to the situation, that samba may request the list of printers before cups is ready to serve it. That's the reason, why samba gets the list after a restart. Solution: wait a little time after cups has been started or (better) use a current release of cups (1.1.16 or cvs). bye On Thursday 28 November 2002 11:22, Simon Chappell wrote: Can anyone advise how to get Cups to survive a reboot with samba. After Reboot both samba and cups are running but there are no samba preinters unless I restart Samba. I have set links to rc3.d so that cups starts before samba but still doesnt work. Any help would be greatly appreceiated Regards Simon - This mail sent through IMP on Redhat 8.0 and Qmail with Ldap. -- Martin Zielinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] still no sol. !!!
dear sir hello, well i did all my effort to run samba with Xp but its not working, i think it is not compitable with Xp and still getting the same problem... ,so do you have any other opinion or solution about it?? need your view about it... pls help, regards, bimal On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 bimal pandit wrote : dear sir/madam hello i am trying to run a samba server with linux 7.3 and win xp but loaded rpm of samba of linux 7.2 the thing is that i am able to see the workgroup in windows xp but the contents of it are invisible what could be the prob. the log file is showing following errors 1) smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(62) yield_connection:tdb_delete failed with error record does not exist 2) lib/access.c:check_access(320) denied connection from 10.10.10.10( ip of xp machine) the ip of my linux m/c is 10.10.10.12 can anyone help me?? looking for your quick response. with thanks bimal -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Cups
On 2002-11-28 at 10:22 + Simon Chappell sent off: Can anyone advise how to get Cups to survive a reboot with samba. After Reboot both samba and cups are running but there are no samba preinters unless I restart Samba. I have set links to rc3.d so that cups starts before samba but still doesnt work. you simply need to make sure that cupsd is being *fully* started (not just starting in background) before samba is being started. I don't know much about the RH init script internals, so I can't tell you what to do exactly. On SuSE Linux it works out of the box. On RH, try changing the order the scripts are executed and make sure the cupsd is fully up. A little sleep might help in the script, too. Bjoern msg09691/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: AW: [Samba] attrib +R myowndir fails to write-protect my own dir
On November 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: actually a second attempt at drawing your attention to the fact that compliance with M$ quirks and kinks is not something to be ashamed of but rather reason to be proud. I think you'll find that the Samba team are quite familiar with this opinion, especially in the context of the Samba TNG fork :) Waider. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me. Ron babe, TNG fork was a preventable disaster. I think the problem is a lot of us are sitting on our thumbs and letting Jeremy and the band pick out all the problems for us. When schedules get too tight and there are different priorities there's always a gang leader for a schism. That it plays into the hands of the great Satan duplicating the effort and splitting the community is a matter of grave concern for all. M$ will underbid any serious attempt at a mass migration to open source with hefty rebates, and there's little we can do against that except strive to be a serious alternative and not a bunch of fundamentalists picking at articles of faith. What's wrong about admitting that the u-g-o octals were too narrow a view of security and accepting that a businessperson may be a visionary in her own right by just thinking a little out of *nix box? For open source to have a chance, it needs to be ahead of the pack and you can't do that before you catch up. A little rant helps relieve the tension of an admin's day of work. Bye now, Dragan PS: On a different note: Ron, do you have a constructive comment on my posting 'Special link folders - Readonly attrib', Tue Nov 26 20:53:28 2002, or are you just a kibitzer? _ Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year. http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plusref=lmtplus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] IP address change
A while back samba was installed on a machine with IP address 10.1.0.19, default router 10.1.0.1. The IP address was recently changed to 10.2.0.57, default router 10.2.0.1. The share used to be available across our network as specified by hosts allow. However, since the IP Address change ONLY 10.2 machines can see the share. It is no longer available to the whole network. The server itself can be seen without any difficulty from the whole network, either using the new IP address or the hostname. It can also be seen thru NT as a sharable machine but when you try to connect to it from anywhere other than 10.2 you get a 'Network path was not found' message. Does samba support changing the IP address in this way? Donna Donna Tombs IT Manager OST Information Technology Section East Renfrewshire Council Phone: 0141 577 3456 Fax: 0141 577 3421 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are not necessarily the view of East Renfrewshire Council. It is intended only for the person or entity named above. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and then erasing the e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. East Renfrewshire Council may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Installing Samba
Title: Installing Samba While trying to install samba on our Unix server, step 1: building Binaries. I have the following error message while executing the command ./configure checking configure summary... WARNING: No automated network interface determinat ion ERROR: no seteuid method available configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config How can I result this error? Best regards, Damien Decoene Administrator Netagco AVR Meensesteenweg 545 8800 Roeselare Tel: 051/25.98.74 Fax: 051/22.95.61 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Samba] IP address change
You have posible two problems: 1. Change ip is dificultly of more systems not only samba... you must check your firewall, router firewall , samba conf host allow , etc hosts allow 2. If you use wins server or domain you must check or stop samba and delete samba cache files to samba recreate databases. - Original Message - From: Tombs, Donna [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:23 PM Subject: [Samba] IP address change A while back samba was installed on a machine with IP address 10.1.0.19, default router 10.1.0.1. The IP address was recently changed to 10.2.0.57, default router 10.2.0.1. The share used to be available across our network as specified by hosts allow. However, since the IP Address change ONLY 10.2 machines can see the share. It is no longer available to the whole network. The server itself can be seen without any difficulty from the whole network, either using the new IP address or the hostname. It can also be seen thru NT as a sharable machine but when you try to connect to it from anywhere other than 10.2 you get a 'Network path was not found' message. Does samba support changing the IP address in this way? Donna Donna Tombs IT Manager OST Information Technology Section East Renfrewshire Council Phone: 0141 577 3456 Fax: 0141 577 3421 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are not necessarily the view of East Renfrewshire Council. It is intended only for the person or entity named above. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and then erasing the e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, review, dissemination, distribution or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. East Renfrewshire Council may monitor outgoing and incoming e-mails. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] problem with smbc_init in libsmbclient
Hi,
I have attached a very simple c program, that first does a smbc_init and
then a smbc_opendir. The problem: smbc_init return an error (No such file
or directory) and then i get a segmentation fault. I don't know what
possibly could be the problem. Maybe some of you guys have an idea. I
think i have libsmbclient from samba 2.2.7(compiled on my own system) and
the rest of the samba stuff is the one that comes with mandrake 8.2.
Thanks,
Razvan Rotaru
/*
Unix SMB/Netbios implementation.
Version 2.0
SMB client library test program
Copyright (C) Andrew Tridgell 1998
Copyright (C) Richard Sharpe 2000
Copyright (C) John Terpsra 2000
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
*/
#include stdio.h
#include errno.h
#include string.h
#include unistd.h
#include libsmbclient.h
void auth_fn(const char *server, const char *share,
char *workgroup, int wgmaxlen, char *username, int unmaxlen,
char *password, int pwmaxlen)
{
char temp[128];
fprintf(stdout, Need password for //%s/%s\n, server, share);
fprintf(stdout, Enter workgroup: [%s] , workgroup);
fgets(temp, sizeof(temp), stdin);
if (temp[strlen(temp) - 1] == 0x0a) /* A new line? */
temp[strlen(temp) - 1] = 0x00;
if (temp[0]) strncpy(workgroup, temp, wgmaxlen - 1);
fprintf(stdout, Enter username: [%s] , username);
fgets(temp, sizeof(temp), stdin);
if (temp[strlen(temp) - 1] == 0x0a) /* A new line? */
temp[strlen(temp) - 1] = 0x00;
if (temp[0]) strncpy(username, temp, unmaxlen - 1);
fprintf(stdout, Enter password: [%s] , password);
fgets(temp, sizeof(temp), stdin);
if (temp[strlen(temp) - 1] == 0x0a) /* A new line? */
temp[strlen(temp) - 1] = 0x00;
if (temp[0]) strncpy(password, temp, pwmaxlen - 1);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int err, fd, dh;
//char dirbuf[512];
//char *dirp;
struct stat st1, st2;
struct smbc_dirent dirp[128];
char path[]=smb://cherban/;
err = smbc_init(auth_fn, 10);
if (err 0) {
fprintf(stderr, Initializing the smbclient library : %s\n, strerror(errno));
}
dh=smbc_opendir(path);
if (dh 0) {
fprintf(stderr, Could not open directory: %s: %s\n,path,strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
/* Now, list those directories, but in funny ways ... */
/*if ((dirc = smbc_getdents(dh1,dirp,sizeof(struct smbc_dirent)*128)) 0) {
fprintf(stderr, Problems getting directory entries: %s\n,
strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
*/
/* Now, process the list of names ... */
/*fprintf(stdout, Directory listing, size = %u\n, dirc);
while (dirc 0) {
dsize = ((struct smbc_dirent *)dirp)-dirlen;
fprintf(stdout, Dir Ent, Type: %u, Name: %s, Comment: %s\n,
((struct smbc_dirent *)dirp)-smbc_type,
((struct smbc_dirent *)dirp)-name,
((struct smbc_dirent *)dirp)-comment);
dirp += dsize;
(char *)dirc -= dsize;
}
*/
return 0;
}
[Samba] Connection failed with smbclient
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I looked through the archives, but didn't see anything like this. I have a network with a mix of Win95, Win98, and WinME clients (and one Linux system w/ Samba server version 2.2.2). All systems belong to a workgroup called Oteima. All Win95 and Win98 clients see all other systems (including the Linux box) in one list. However, a couple of systems (notably the WinME systems) see _two_ Oteima workgroups. Problem is, the Samba server, using nmblookup can find _all_ systems, but using smbclient can only connect to the Windoze systems listed in one Oteima workgroup, but get a connection failed when trying to connect to systems in the other Oteima workgroup. I very methodically checked using nmblookup and sbmclient whether I could see/connect to every system. [root@appgen root]# nmblookup caja querying caja on 192.168.5.255 192.168.5.42 caja00 [root@appgen root]# smbclient //caja/c added interface ip=192.168.5.50 bcast=192.168.5.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Connection to caja failed if I could resolve _why_ some Win systems have _two_ Oteima workgoups (one to which I can connect to _all_ listed systems and one to which I cannot connect to any) I could resolve this dilemna. I've tried: changing workgroup name (all lowercase, all uppercase, mixed upper/lower case); encrypt passwds yes/no. Changing protocol mins and maxs (from CORE to NT1). I'm running out of ideas. Any and all suggestions welcome. David A. Bandel - -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE95iiG3uVcotqGMQcRAsIbAKCvG630vfFHmod71Hyh+IpkUGfVQwCgwuog nbjz45yzhN5ygZ3HDFPMmJA= =xJ+8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Problem with creating machine account for domain logon
Title: Problem with creating machine account for domain logon in smb.conf use "add user script" option . -Message d'origine-De: Ernst Cozijnsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Envoyé: jeudi 28 novembre 2002 10:02À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Objet: [Samba] Problem with creating machine account for domain logon Hi, If i try to let my laptop logon to my samba domain i see in the logfiles that there must me a machine account in the /etc/passwd file. So i created manualy "useradd machine$" This works fine and i'm able to log on to the domain. Why doesn't create samba this machine account automaticly?? do u need a special option for that?? greetz, Ernst Cozijnsen -- This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst Young Group. It is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
[Samba] Installing
Hi I have downloaded samba latest version and am trying to install on our Alpha running Tru64 Unix version 5a. When I run the configure script in the source directory I get the message Configure: error: summary failure. aborting configure On reading the config.log file It tells me It can't file the include files. but these are in the /usr/include/sys directory. I have also used the ./confilgure --includedir=/usr/include/sys but still get the same message. Any ideas Mank thanks Willie O'Brien ** Important Notice The information in this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may also be legally privileged intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and are not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent written confirmation of its contents. The content of this e-mail is the personal view of the sender and does not represent the advice, views or opinion of the Office of Public Works. Accordingly, the Office of Public Works disclaims all responsibility and accepts no liability (including in negligence) for the consequences of any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written confirmation. In particular (but not by way of limitation) the Office of Public Works disclaims all responsibility and accepts no liability for any e-mails or their attachments which are defamatory, offensive, racist or which in any other way are in breach of an individuals rights, including breach of confidence, privacy or other rights. If you have received this e-mail message in error, inform us immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete it and all copies from your system. This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba nfs...
Hi, I'm having problems with M$ Office files on an samba mounted fs. Here's the deal. Server A is an NFS server holding the homes. (Irix 6.5.14) Server B is the Samba server (Samba 2.2.2, kernel oplocks = no, Irix 6.5.14) The homes are nfs-mounted on the Samba server (autofs), and all is well until someone tries to open or create an Microsoft Office Document. I suppose it has something to do with the (bloody) ~$blahblah.doc files that are created by Office.. The log.smbd gives: [2002/11/28 14:05:54, 0] locking/posix.c:(667) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 2147483538, length 1 returned [2002/11/28 14:05:54, 0] locking/posix.c:(669) an No locks available error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/11/28 14:05:54, 0] locking/posix.c:(670) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2002/11/28 14:06:06, 0] locking/posix.c:(667) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 2147483538, length 1 returned [2002/11/28 14:06:06, 0] locking/posix.c:(669) an No locks available error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/11/28 14:06:06, 0] locking/posix.c:(670) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. [2002/11/28 14:06:32, 0] locking/posix.c:(667) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 2147483538, length 1 returned [2002/11/28 14:06:32, 0] locking/posix.c:(669) an No locks available error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/11/28 14:06:32, 0] locking/posix.c:(670) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. Does anyone have any idea what the h£$% is going on? Thanks! :wq //shoe - UNIX _IS_ user friendly, its just picky about who its friends are... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems with Passwordchange from NT4 to samba 2.7.7
Hello all, I've got a little problem to change the user-password from NT4 on a samba-server (RedHat 8.0) - but I can get without any problem shares on that server with that user and password. Why does samba say, I would supply a wrong password to my userid? What am I doing wrong? Thank you for your tips, kind regards, Andreas Hartmann smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = FAGCID3 server string = Samba Server fagcid3 encrypt passwords = Yes min passwd length = 8 obey pam restrictions = Yes pam password change = no passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* username map = /etc/samba/smbusers password level = 16 username level = 16 unix password sync = No log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 character set = ISO8859-15 domain admin group = root,user2 logon script = %U.cmd logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U logon drive = h: domain logons = Yes os level = 64 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes dns proxy = No wins support = Yes create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 inherit acls = Yes printing = cups map system = Yes map hidden = Yes csc policy = disable [wintransl] comment = Testshare path = /home/samba/wintrans valid users = @wintrans force group = wintrans read only = No Log: [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 2] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(575) pass_check_smb failed - invalid password for user [daahb] ^ [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 1] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_ntlmssp_verify(366) api_pipe_ntlmssp_verify: User D055812\daahb from machine D055812 failed authentication on named pipe samr. [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(114) Failed to set gid privileges to (0,99) now set to (0,-1) uid=(0,99) [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1094) PANIC: failed to set gid [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(114) Failed to set gid privileges to (0,99) now set to (0,-1) uid=(0,99) [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1094) PANIC: failed to set gid [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(114) Failed to set gid privileges to (0,99) now set to (0,-1) uid=(0,99) [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1094) PANIC: failed to set gid [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 2] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(575) pass_check_smb failed - invalid password for user [daahb] [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 1] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_ntlmssp_verify(366) api_pipe_ntlmssp_verify: User D055812\daahb from machine D055812 failed authentication on named pipe samr. [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(114) Failed to set gid privileges to (0,99) now set to (0,-1) uid=(0,99) [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1094) PANIC: failed to set gid [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(114) Failed to set gid privileges to (0,99) now set to (0,-1) uid=(0,99) [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1094) PANIC: failed to set gid [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(114) Failed to set gid privileges to (0,99) now set to (0,-1) uid=(0,99) [2002/11/28 16:27:34, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1094) PANIC: failed to set gid -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] CUPS installation with SAMBA
I installed samba via rpm and I want to install cups using the source code, anyone knows what are the procedure to that ? ps- CUPS will works with samba.. RedHat 7.2 Samba 2.2.5 __ Venha para a VilaBOL! O melhor lugar para você construir seu site. Fácil e grátis! http://vila.bol.com.br -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Trusted domains with Samba 3.0alpha21?
Hi there! I appear to be having problems with trusted domains using 3.0a21. Using Samba as a member server, as user nirs on domain Exanet-il I am unable to log on to a member server (snow) who is a member of the Exanet-qa domain. The exanet-qa is supposed to trust exanet-il, and it all worked with 2.2 . This is the relevant log snippet I can find: [2002/11/28 18:26:05, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(425) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user nirs in domain EX ANET-QA to Domain controller \\KENGURO. Error was NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER. [2002/11/28 18:26:05, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(271) check_password: Authentication for user [nirs] - [nirs] FAILED with error NT _STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER [2002/11/28 18:26:05, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:do_map_to_guest(38) No such user nirs [EXANET-IL] - using guest account [2002/11/28 18:26:05, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(255) Anyone have any idea? Is this supposed to work in 3.0 now? thanks, Nir. -- Nir Soffer -=- Software Engineer, Exanet Inc. -=- The poor little kittens; They lost their mittens; And now you all must die. Mew, Mew, Mew, Mew, And now you all must die. www.sluggy.com, 24/10/02 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
Please help! I am getting awesome read performance from my samba server, but writing to it is terrible. My server configuration is SUN Ultra 2 dual 400 mhz CPUs (Solaris 8 64bit mode) 1 gig of ram and dual 100 meg network cards running samba 2.2.6 windows box is XP home, 1 gig AMD with 384 megs ram and 100 meg network card I can pull 6.5 meg/sec copying an ISO from the samba server to the windows box, but only about 500K sec writing back to the samba server from the same machine. for writes I am using a 400 meg avi file. Please look at my config and let me know where i screwed up! Thanks!! # Global parameters[global] workgroup =WRKGRP netbios name =SERVER server string =SAMBA File Server security = usr encrypt passwords = Yes restrict anonymous = Yes log level = 1 log file = /var/adm/samba/log.%m max log size = 256000 large readwrite = Yes deadtime = 15 max open files = 2000 read size = 65535 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 SO_RCVBUF=16384 lock dir = /var/tmp/samba_locks remote announce = yes remote browse sync = yes socket address = 192.168.0.1 hosts allow = 192.168.0. max connections = 150 write cache size = 65535 strict locking = no strict sync = no sync always = no read prediction = yes max xmit = 65535 read raw = yes write raw = yes oplocks = on
re: [Samba] Problems with Passwordchange from NT4 to samba 2.2.7
Just to mention the correct samba-version :-). Sorry. Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] I want no browsing
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, BEOI 7308 wrote: Ok But will the ntlm authentication still work ? smbd handles ALL authentication requests, not nmbd. - John T. Thanks John H Terpstra a écrit : On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Dan Am wrote: AFAIR the parameter is called BROWSABLE = no No. That just hides as share, but the samba server will still announce itself. If you want to NOT announce at all, then simply do NOT run nmbd. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] system error 64, win xp and samba
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, mlh wrote: Just so that it gets into the archives for future googlers: If you get 'system error 64' on a windows xp machine trying to connect to samba, then make sure you have nothing running on port 445. I had an apache ssl instance running on that port. Really? The well known port for that is 443. Doh! Had to scratch my head a bit over it. XP doesn't actually need anything to be on 445, it just gets confused and gives up if there is. Port 445 is the port Win2K and WinXP use for netbiosless SMB. It is the correct well known TCP port that Microsoft have registered for the purpose. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Cups
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Simon Chappell wrote: Can anyone advise how to get Cups to survive a reboot with samba. After Reboot both samba and cups are running but there are no samba preinters unless I restart Samba. I have set links to rc3.d so that cups starts before samba but still doesnt work. Any help would be greatly appreceiated You must start samba after cups is running. Your boot order is the problem. In the rc3.d directory your will find a script called Sxxname for each service. The xx for cupsd needs to be earlier than the one for smb (or samba). - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba-2.2.7-1.7.3 Win XP home vs Pro?
Many thanks all for the help with the printer hookup problem. I can now print and use drives/shares on my samba server from my XP-home edition just fine. My problem now I think is a windows problem, but some of you have probably seen this or know how to avoid it in any case. My XP-Professional boxes seem unable to find my samba server for either network drives or printer. I note the following, hoping it might help you to help me. Hosts- OS - david- RedHat Linux 7.3 (samba server) dfr - XP - Home Edition fu - XP - Home Edition armando - XP - Professional Edition aichingf - XP - Professional Edition [root@david root]# nmblookup david querying david on 192.168.131.255 192.168.131.124 david00 [root@david root]# nmblookup dfr querying dfr on 192.168.131.255 192.168.131.121 dfr00 [root@david root]# nmblookup fu querying fu on 192.168.131.255 192.168.131.125 fu00 [root@david root]# nmblookup armando querying armando on 192.168.131.255 querying armando on 192.168.130.255 name_query failed to find name armando [root@david root]# nmblookup aichingf querying aichingf on 192.168.131.255 querying aichingf on 192.168.130.255 name_query failed to find name aichingf Many thanks for your help. -- Dave -- David F. Reed - email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (for pgp key: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://keys.pgp.com/ ) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RPMs of alpha21 for Mandrake 9.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have built RPMs for Mandrake 9.0 that will parallel install with an existing samba-2.2.x installation (you should be running 2.2.7-2.1mdk if your machine is up-to-date). RPMS here: http://ranger.dnsalias.com/mandrake/mandrake9.0/samba-3.0alpha21/ The srpm should build cleanly on anything from Mandrake 7.2 and up, but I don't have time at the moment to build for other releases. No testing besides it installs and runs Regards, Buchan - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE95jhOrJK6UGDSBKcRAlG8AKCjIb/Tu0+iYYaXjRAg4FtGhrHf9gCfdWVs eAxYNQOD1gUMFnyW5l7Gd+g= =Pv9c -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba and WindowsXP
Hello all. I'm writing to inquire about two particular problems with Samba and Windows XP that have me perplexed. Problem #1: I have a Solaris9 Samba 2.2.5 server, which acts as a print server to all the other UNIX nodes on the network. This works fine, however, when I print from WindowsXP, instead of getting the actual printout, I get the PostScript source code, pages and pages of it. The printer is an HP LaserJet4ML/PS, so it's PS capable. Under UNIX, it's set up as a PS printer on the print server. I've already read the documentation under docs/Registry and applied the WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg. UNIX clients (IRIX, RedHat, HP-UX) print to it without any problems. Problem #2: I can not map a network drive on an IRIX 6.5.17f box, even though I can see the share. I log in under XP with the identical login as I would under IRIX. When I try to map the drive, I even pick Connect using a different user name and type in my UNIX login and passwd, but it won't map the network drive. I've applied the Win2000_PlainPassword.reg, with no results, of course. The only thing that works right now is reading and writing to a share that has guest ok = yes configured. Another two crucial pieces of information are that the PC bucket which runs XP is part of a work group, as are the Samba servers. The reason being, I use NIS and for a Samba server to be a domain controller, I would have to maintain three separate passwd files. One for local system accounts, one for NIS users, and one for Samba, which obviously defeats the whole purpose having NIS. Does Samba not work with authenticating against NIS? I thought this is handled at the OS level, and not by Samba. Can anyone help with suggestions or experiences? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Samba share is not writeable
Steve, thanks. Your tip makes mounting the share easier. I found what I believe was the problem, so I'll share it in case someone else has the same troubles, and browses upon this thread... I read somewhere that you can only set permissions on Win XP machines that are formatted to use the NTFS file system. Mine was FAT 32. So I changed my file system type to NTFS without data loss by executing: convert c: FS:NTFS /V And viola, whatever I say dmask is, it is! Regards, --James On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 21:18, James wrote: Thanks for the speedy reply. Sorry if the word 'permissions' is incorrect. I did as you suggested below, making the appropriate changes for my network. Then I executed mount /home/samba and it mounted the share without error, but it was still not writeable. The directory changed from drwx-- (unmounted) to dr-xr-xr-x (mounted). I added dmask=0700 th the line that I added in /etc/fstab between gid=500 and credentials... Then the mounted directory was dr-x--. On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 20:45, Simeonidis, Steve wrote: I haven't played with permissions much but I've got the following line in my /etc/fstab file and it works fine. //abinidi/common/abinidi/common smbfs uid=500,gid=500,credentials=/etc/smbmount_passwd,workgroup=SGL-AUS,rw 0 0 The content of the smbmount_passwd is username = xxx password = xx owned by root. I hope that helps. Thanks Steve Simeonidis Network Engineer, Spherion Education Spherion Group Ltd 1st Floor, 493 St. Kilda Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia Phone: +61 3 9243 2382Fax:+61 3 9820 2010 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this email and any attachments to it: (a) may be confidential and if you are not the intended recipient, any interference with, use, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited; and (b) may contain personal information of the recipient and/or the sender as defined under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Consent is hereby given by the recipient(s) to collect, hold and use such information and any personal information contained in a response to this email, for any reasonable purpose in the ordinary course of Spherion's business, including forwarding this email internally or disclosing it to a third party. All personal information collected by Spherion will be handled in accordance with Spherion's Privacy Policy. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it. -Original Message- From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Samba share is not writeable I am having difficulty with Windows shares mounted with smb on my linux machine. The mount directory will not have write permissions for anyone, no matter what. The mount directory that I use is /home/samba. It has 0700, or drwx-- permissions when it is not connected to Samba. It is owned by the user jhall, and the group root. When I mount it, if I use dmask 0777, I get dr-xr-xr-x. If I use dmask 0700, I get dr-x--, and so on. The subdirectories have the proper dmask, and thus are writeable. The shared directory on my Win XP Pro box is SharedDocs, and jhall has full permissions in this directory. Below is an example of my shell commands and subsequent output: [root@laptop jhall]# ls -l /home ##See that the dir samba is writable by jhall drwx-- 37 jhallusers4096 Nov 27 19:42 jhall drwx--2 jhallusers4096 Nov 27 11:09 samba drwx-- 21 stephie stephie 4096 Nov 27 14:58 stephie ##This is how I mount the share [root@laptop jhall]# mount -t smbfs -o user=jhall,uid=jhall,gid=root,dmask=0700,fmask=0777 //desktop/SharedDocs /home/samba Password: [root@laptop jhall]# ls -l /home ##Now it is mounted, and I can read and execute everything that ##is on my shared windows directory, but can only write things that ##are in a subdirectory, because they have the proper dmask of 0700 ##I am logged in as jhall when I try to write to the directory. drwx-- 37 jhallusers4096 Nov 27 19:42 jhall dr-x--1 jhallroot 4096 Nov 24 11:54 samba drwx-- 21 stephie stephie 4096 Nov 27 14:58 stephie [root@laptop jhall]# smbumount /home/samba ##I unmount the directory [root@laptop jhall]# ls -l /home ##And again have write permission drwx-- 37 jhallusers4096 Nov 27 19:42 jhall drwx--2 jhallusers4096 Nov 27 11:09 samba drwx-- 21 stephie stephie 4096 Nov 27 14:58 stephie I hope that this is enough information. Any help is appreciated! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions:
[Samba] Netware copy fails
Affected: Various 2.x.x releases of samba on Solaris 2.6/8 and Netware 5.1 SP5. Problem: Unable to copy files from a mapped Netware drive to a mapped samba share on a PC desktop (W2K). Error: Several, but commonly Cannot copy MYFILE. Access is denied. The source file may be in use or An unexpected network error has occurred. Has anyone seen similar? It appears that some sort of corruption happens to a file once it goes to a Netware server. This does not corrupt the data in the file, but prevents the file being able to be transferred to the samba share. For example, I have a W2K desktop with: S: mapped to a samba share. N: mapped to a Netware drive. I create a new file on my PC, call it 'MYFILE'. I can drop this file onto S:(samba) OK. Now, I can also drop this file onto N:(Netware) OK. I get the error if I try copying from N: to S: Now, if I then copy the file back from N: to my desktop, the file is broken! I can no longer copy the file from my PC hard drive to the S: drive. If, however, I do a Save As from within Word, I can ALWAYS save the file to S:. This happens with both IP and IPX connections to N:. If I ftp the broken file from my PC to the Solaris server, and then copy it back to my PC, it is fixed. I can once again drag and drop it to the samba share. ftp both the good file and the bad file to Solaris. Run bdiff, and the files are identical. So, is it something in the inode information (or whatever there is in Netware) that is causing the problem? It would be good to hear from someone who has seen similar so I know I'm not imagining this! David David Stone Systems and Database Administrator The Macaulay Institute Craigiebuckler Aberdeen AB15 8QH Scotland, UK Tel: +(44) (0) 1224 498200 Ext 2131 Fax: +(44) (0) 1224 311556 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.macaulay.ac.uk/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba and WindowsXP
#1 I would print a job to a file on the client, transfer it manually to your server and view it with gv, vi, or whatever, to make sure it is a proper postscript file. Then, try to print it on the server to your printer. If all goes well, then you have to simply change the print command in your samba share to the print command you used to successfully print the file manually. Also, note there are different versions of postscript. Maybe your printer doesn't understand the version being sent to it. Joel On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 01:03:34PM -0500, VB wrote: Hello all. I'm writing to inquire about two particular problems with Samba and Windows XP that have me perplexed. Problem #1: I have a Solaris9 Samba 2.2.5 server, which acts as a print server to all the other UNIX nodes on the network. This works fine, however, when I print from WindowsXP, instead of getting the actual printout, I get the PostScript source code, pages and pages of it. The printer is an HP LaserJet4ML/PS, so it's PS capable. Under UNIX, it's set up as a PS printer on the print server. I've already read the documentation under docs/Registry and applied the WinXP_SignOrSeal.reg. UNIX clients (IRIX, RedHat, HP-UX) print to it without any problems. Problem #2: I can not map a network drive on an IRIX 6.5.17f box, even though I can see the share. I log in under XP with the identical login as I would under IRIX. When I try to map the drive, I even pick Connect using a different user name and type in my UNIX login and passwd, but it won't map the network drive. I've applied the Win2000_PlainPassword.reg, with no results, of course. The only thing that works right now is reading and writing to a share that has guest ok = yes configured. Another two crucial pieces of information are that the PC bucket which runs XP is part of a work group, as are the Samba servers. The reason being, I use NIS and for a Samba server to be a domain controller, I would have to maintain three separate passwd files. One for local system accounts, one for NIS users, and one for Samba, which obviously defeats the whole purpose having NIS. Does Samba not work with authenticating against NIS? I thought this is handled at the OS level, and not by Samba. Can anyone help with suggestions or experiences? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] delay while browsing printer list
Hello, while using samba 2.2.7 with cups as print server for windows clients, every user gets a 15-20 seconds freeze of the complete desktop (mouse movement still works) when opening the printer list the first time after login. (If all printers are closed the can be reproduced). Has anyone else noticed this ? The workaround is to use a local printer instead and point its port from lpt1: to /servername/printershare. While this stops the delay it prevents the users from seeing print jobs of others, not quite what a print queue is good for. Known solutions available? Holger [printers] path = /samba/dtemp create mask = 0744 printable = yes browsable = no guest ok = yes use client driver = yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] DOMAIN SID in samba ldap
Hi ! Where the DOMAIN SID is stored when the LDAP backend is used ? I got a lot of errors (C19b) when trying to log to samba domain from NT WRK. I have found in FAQs and archives that this problem appear when domain sid will change after registering nt wrk in the domain. greetz gnu_is_not_unix --- Hackman i De Vito poka Ci, co znaczy prawdziwa mio... do pienidzy! SKOK w kinach - od 29 listopada http://film.wp.pl/p/film.html?id=1782 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba nfs...
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Stefan Nordlander wrote: Hi, I'm having problems with M$ Office files on an samba mounted fs. Here's the deal. Server A is an NFS server holding the homes. (Irix 6.5.14) Server B is the Samba server (Samba 2.2.2, kernel oplocks = no, Irix 6.5.14) The homes are nfs-mounted on the Samba server (autofs), and all is well until someone tries to open or create an Microsoft Office Document. I suppose it has something to do with the (bloody) ~$blahblah.doc files that are created by Office.. The log.smbd gives: [2002/11/28 14:05:54, 0] locking/posix.c:(667) posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock request at offset 2147483538, length 1 returned [2002/11/28 14:05:54, 0] locking/posix.c:(669) an No locks available error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets [2002/11/28 14:05:54, 0] locking/posix.c:(670) on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems. Errr - I'd guess what's happening is what the error says :-). And when I added that message I thought it'd be very clear :-(. The kernel Samba is running on supports 64 bit fcntl locks, however the underlying (NFS) filesystem that the files are being shared from only supports 32 bit locks. Thus the lock request is being denied. If these files are only being accessed by Windows users (the usual case for MS-Office files, unless you have OpenOffice on IRIX) then you can turn off the mapping down to POSIX locking by setting the parameter posix locking = False. No harm done. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] no logon servers available
Hi, I am running samba 2.2.7 as a PDC with a couple of Win2k workstations participating in the domain. Once in a while of the workstations, I can't access shares on the other, getting a message no logon servers available. Once I restart smbd and nmbd via /etc/init.d/smb stop start, the problem goes away immediately. I tried to search in samba logs, but there were no error messages. What might be the problem? Thanks, -- Nicholas Sushkin -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
You know the default tuning parameters we ship should just work, especially in 2.2.7. Try removing the following paramters and seeing if it helps. Jeremy. On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:41:25AM -0600, Justin Richards wrote: [global] read size = 65535 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 SO_RCVBUF=16384 max connections = 150 write cache size = 65535 read prediction = yes max xmit = 65535 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
I have tried your advice, infact I removed everything but the necessary server information and still no difference. read speed still very good, write speed still way below par. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Justin Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 1:33 PM Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8 You know the default tuning parameters we ship should just work, especially in 2.2.7. Try removing the following paramters and seeing if it helps. Jeremy. On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:41:25AM -0600, Justin Richards wrote: [global] read size = 65535 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 SO_RCVBUF=16384 max connections = 150 write cache size = 65535 read prediction = yes max xmit = 65535 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 02:24:16PM -0600, Justin Richards wrote: I have tried your advice, infact I removed everything but the necessary server information and still no difference. read speed still very good, write speed still way below par. Ok, now you have to do some work to profile the system and see where the bottleneck may be. What is the maximum write speed onto the disk from a local process (ufs on Solaris is notoriously slow) ? Start there to find what your maximum should be and work back into Samba to find the bottleneck. System profile tools (top, vmstat, iostat) are useful here. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
using iostat and doing some basic file testing such as: time dd if=/dev/zero of=./tst bs=8192 count=8192 time dd if=./tst of=/dev/null bs=8192 count=8192 my write speed was about 13.5 meg a sec, and read was 13 meg a sec. I didn't explain my disk set up before, let me do that briefly. I have a SUN 1010 fiber disk array, with 16 18gig drives and 10 9gig drives. The file systems I am doing my tests on are a stripe of 4 18gig drives. I also did some tests with a SUN 711 attached to the same system which has a 36 gig drive in it, with that I get right under 20 meg/sec read and right (711 is attached with fast-wide scsi) I'm going to recompile 2.2.7 and see if I get any different results.. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Justin Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:29 PM Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8 On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 02:24:16PM -0600, Justin Richards wrote: I have tried your advice, infact I removed everything but the necessary server information and still no difference. read speed still very good, write speed still way below par. Ok, now you have to do some work to profile the system and see where the bottleneck may be. What is the maximum write speed onto the disk from a local process (ufs on Solaris is notoriously slow) ? Start there to find what your maximum should be and work back into Samba to find the bottleneck. System profile tools (top, vmstat, iostat) are useful here. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] How to disable anonymous account on SAMBA
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 08:10, Tran Andy Contr 61 CS/SCBN wrote: Hi all, I have tried to disable anonymous in smb.conf, by include the global: restrict anonymous = true password server = * encrypt passwords = yes null passwords = no Buy when I ran the : ./smbclient -L myserver -N I have this message: added interface ip=111.xx.xx.xx bcast=111.xx.xx.255 nmask=255.255.252.0 Got a positive name query response from 111.xx.xx.xx( 111.xx.xxx.xx) Anonymous login successful So how can I disable/block the anonymous account??? In Samba 3.0, 'restrict anonymous' has this behavior - set 'restrict anonymous = 2' for what you want. However, in Samba 2.2, this parameter has the behavior described in smb.conf. (i.e. not what you would expect - and not a security advantage). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Samba] samba 3.0a21+pdc+ldap+pam_ldap - add machines [Cananyone help?]
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 08:20, Samba Guy wrote: Well I installed a21 and I was able to add a machine account. The first time it comes back bad password, then the second attempt it works. But now when i restart and try to login it says it cant find the computer account. Am I missing something(yes i have signorseal)? Here is the log from the login attempt: You must either set 'passdb backend = ldapsam unixsam' or add the guest account to LDAP. The guest account must have a RID of 501. (unixsam does a similar thing, based on the 'guest user' in smb.conf and standard getpw*() calls). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Samba] Trusted domains with Samba 3.0alpha21?
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 03:29, Nir Soffer wrote: Hi there! I appear to be having problems with trusted domains using 3.0a21. Using Samba as a member server, as user nirs on domain Exanet-il I am unable to log on to a member server (snow) who is a member of the Exanet-qa domain. The exanet-qa is supposed to trust exanet-il, and it all worked with 2.2 . This is the relevant log snippet I can find: [2002/11/28 18:26:05, 0] auth/auth_domain.c:domain_client_validate(425) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user nirs in domain EX ANET-QA to Domain controller \\KENGURO. Error was NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER. [2002/11/28 18:26:05, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(271) check_password: Authentication for user [nirs] - [nirs] FAILED with error NT _STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER [2002/11/28 18:26:05, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:do_map_to_guest(38) No such user nirs [EXANET-IL] - using guest account [2002/11/28 18:26:05, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(255) Anyone have any idea? Is this supposed to work in 3.0 now? That error is returned by the remote server. The event log on both DCs might be useful. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 02:39:14PM -0600, Justin Richards wrote: using iostat and doing some basic file testing such as: time dd if=/dev/zero of=./tst bs=8192 count=8192 time dd if=./tst of=/dev/null bs=8192 count=8192 my write speed was about 13.5 meg a sec, and read was 13 meg a sec. I didn't explain my disk set up before, let me do that briefly. I have a SUN 1010 fiber disk array, with 16 18gig drives and 10 9gig drives. The file systems I am doing my tests on are a stripe of 4 18gig drives. I also did some tests with a SUN 711 attached to the same system which has a 36 gig drive in it, with that I get right under 20 meg/sec read and right (711 is attached with fast-wide scsi) I'm going to recompile 2.2.7 and see if I get any different results.. Yes, you might find 2.2.7 is better - it does a much better job of pretending to be a W2K server. The clients don't always write in nice 8k chuncks, which is why it isn't as good as the raw numbers would seem. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
same issue with 2.2.7.. I didn't have this issue on my Sparc 20 that I replaced a few days ago with the U2. on the Sparc20, I would get about the same local read/write performance, but with samba, I would get about 3 meg read and 3 meg write. does samba have any known issues running on a 64bit version of solaris? that is the only other major change other than the faster hardware.. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Justin Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8 On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 02:39:14PM -0600, Justin Richards wrote: using iostat and doing some basic file testing such as: time dd if=/dev/zero of=./tst bs=8192 count=8192 time dd if=./tst of=/dev/null bs=8192 count=8192 my write speed was about 13.5 meg a sec, and read was 13 meg a sec. I didn't explain my disk set up before, let me do that briefly. I have a SUN 1010 fiber disk array, with 16 18gig drives and 10 9gig drives. The file systems I am doing my tests on are a stripe of 4 18gig drives. I also did some tests with a SUN 711 attached to the same system which has a 36 gig drive in it, with that I get right under 20 meg/sec read and right (711 is attached with fast-wide scsi) I'm going to recompile 2.2.7 and see if I get any different results.. Yes, you might find 2.2.7 is better - it does a much better job of pretending to be a W2K server. The clients don't always write in nice 8k chuncks, which is why it isn't as good as the raw numbers would seem. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Connection to a Remote XP Box
What I've done so far: Studied man samba Connected to my parents XP box on my LAN (two different connections, even). root@omega-fleet root]# smbclient -L 64.131.112.121 added interface ip=192.168.1.11 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=192.168.1.10 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 session request to some.ip failed (Called name not present) session request to some failed (Called name not present) Password: Domain=[HOME] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] Sharename Type Comment - --- IPC$ IPC Remote IPC D$ Disk Default share ADMIN$ Disk Remote Admin C$ Disk Default share Win98 SE (F) Disk Server Comment ---- CHRIS WorkgroupMaster ---- HOME CHRIS ping -c 10 some.ip PING some.ip (some.ip) from 192.168.1.11 : 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from some.ip: icmp_seq=0 ttl=116 time=337.167 msec 64 bytes from some.ip: icmp_seq=1 ttl=116 time=279.711 msec 64 bytes from some.ip: icmp_seq=2 ttl=116 time=279.710 msec 64 bytes from some.ip: icmp_seq=3 ttl=116 time=259.711 msec 64 bytes from some.ip: icmp_seq=4 ttl=116 time=279.709 msec 64 bytes from some.ip: icmp_seq=5 ttl=116 time=279.691 msec 64 bytes from some.ip: icmp_seq=6 ttl=116 time=269.588 msec 64 bytes from some.ip: icmp_seq=7 ttl=116 time=259.712 msec 64 bytes from some.ip: icmp_seq=8 ttl=116 time=269.710 msec 64 bytes from some.op: icmp_seq=9 ttl=116 time=269.784 msec --- 64.131.112.121 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 259.711/278.449/337.167/20.947 ms He's connected directly to the gateway. No firewall. mount -t smbfs -o username=somename,password=somepass //s.o.m.e.i.p/F /chris/ 21287: session request to s.o.m.e.i.p. failed (Called name not present) 21287: session request to s failed (Called name not present) 21287: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnosuchshare (You specified an invalid share name) SMB connection failed But the command works when I use: mount -t smbfs -o username=username,password=somepass //hal9001/C /linux/ ((box on lan)) What am I missing/doing wrong? -- Joseph A Nagy Jr Purgatory is where Windows users go when they Founder and CEO die so they can figure out Linux and ascend into Joseph A Nagy Jr Enterprises whatever higher plane one belives in. http://jan-jr-ent.homelinux.org Linux - The Choice of Every Generation C.S.S.: Construct Skilled in Sabotage H.T.M.L.: Hazardous Troubleshooting and Mathematics Lifeform http://www.brunching.com/cgi/cyborger.cgi?acronym=Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Connection to a Remote XP Box
The one thing I missed...I'M behind a router (Linksys DSL/Cable 4-Port router). -- Joseph A Nagy Jr Purgatory is where Windows users go when they Founder and CEO die so they can figure out Linux and ascend into Joseph A Nagy Jr Enterprises whatever higher plane one belives in. http://jan-jr-ent.homelinux.org Linux - The Choice of Every Generation C.S.S.: Construct Skilled in Sabotage H.T.M.L.: Hazardous Troubleshooting and Mathematics Lifeform http://www.brunching.com/cgi/cyborger.cgi?acronym=Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
Justin, What type of performance do you get when putting a file to the server using FTP? Or NFS for that matter? If there is a networking issue other than Samba, you should see slow write performance using those protocols as well Samba will probably be close to NFS in speed, with both being somewhat slower than FTP, which has less protocol overhead (no filesystem involved). -- Jim Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Changing samba account password from Windows XP
Hi all, I understand that the changing of samba account password can be achieved through the Windows 2000 client by means of CTRL-ALT-DELand selecting "Change Password". How do we achieve such equivalent in Windows XP clients? Michael
[Samba] Current master browser = UKNOWN
Title: Current master browser = UKNOWN samba 2.2.5 We use an NT PDC for password authentication and an NT WINS server. Both of those systems are on a different subnet. I have setup remote announce = PDC subnet broadcast and remote browse sync = WINS server IP Do I have to setup the SAMBA server as a master browser? I don't want to mess things up with the WINS servers. Thanks Steve Simeonidis Network Engineer, Spherion Education Spherion Group Ltd Making the Workplace Work Better 1st Floor, 493 St. Kilda Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia +61 3 9243 2382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 7:29 AM To: Justin Richards Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8 On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 02:24:16PM -0600, Justin Richards wrote: I have tried your advice, infact I removed everything but the necessary server information and still no difference. read speed still very good, write speed still way below par. Ok, now you have to do some work to profile the system and see where the bottleneck may be. What is the maximum write speed onto the disk from a local process (ufs on Solaris is notoriously slow) ? Start there to find what your maximum should be and work back into Samba to find the bottleneck. System profile tools (top, vmstat, iostat) are useful here. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
Jim, Good call! ftp suffered same performance. i never noticed a NFS problem to my other Sparc's because most of the time I was reading data off of the server. Now to determine where the problem is.. the only settings I have changed in /etc/system is adding: set tcp:tcp_conn_hash_size=32768 set hme:hme_adv_autoneg_cap = 0 set hme:hme_adv_100fdx_cap = 1 no other changes (such as ndd commands). I took the 3 above settings out of /etc/system, rebooted and ftp performance was over 10 meg/sec both directions, samba is now doing 7.5 m/s read from server and 8 m/s write to server. It seems strange that I can write to the samba shares faster than I can read?? both nic's come up as 100meg full duplex, so it must have been the tcp:tcp_conn_hash_size setting. at any rate, thank you both for helping me look at this problem! this kind of performance will keep me happy for a while! Any idea why tcp:tcp_conn_hash_size=32768 would have such negative affect? We have tweaked this setting on some of our larger servers at work (E4500's, E6500's and Sunfire 4800's) and it never had bad results.. - Original Message - From: Jim Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Justin Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 7:39 PM Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8 Justin, What type of performance do you get when putting a file to the server using FTP? Or NFS for that matter? If there is a networking issue other than Samba, you should see slow write performance using those protocols as well Samba will probably be close to NFS in speed, with both being somewhat slower than FTP, which has less protocol overhead (no filesystem involved). -- Jim Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Connection to a Remote XP Box
As I recall your error was called name not present, yes? I am not sure what is doing this. To troubleshoot this, I would make sure that your host resolution is working right. The parameter: [global] name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast hosts determines how things are looked up. lmhosts = lmhosts file on your linux box wins = use wins server bcast = broadcast hosts = use host lookup. Will check /etc/hosts, then your DNS. The default order, as listed in loadparam.c, seems to be: string_set(Globals.szNameResolveOrder, lmhosts host wins bcast); (Yes, host and hosts both seem to work, dunno.) Edit smb.conf, and use just one method at a time, eg: name resolve order = wins smbclient will only try the wins server with this options specified. You might be able to track down where the error is coming from. You don't have to restart smbd after you make these changes. My suspicion is that one of the methods of lookup is returning wrong data. Joel On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 06:53:28PM -0600, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: The one thing I missed...I'M behind a router (Linksys DSL/Cable 4-Port router). -- Joseph A Nagy Jr Purgatory is where Windows users go when they Founder and CEO die so they can figure out Linux and ascend into Joseph A Nagy Jr Enterprises whatever higher plane one belives in. http://jan-jr-ent.homelinux.org Linux - The Choice of Every Generation C.S.S.: Construct Skilled in Sabotage H.T.M.L.: Hazardous Troubleshooting and Mathematics Lifeform http://www.brunching.com/cgi/cyborger.cgi?acronym=Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Connection failed with smbclient
nmblookup likely uses bcasting or a wins server to find a host, whereas smbclient may use lmhost and host (/etc/host and DNS) as well, or none of these, depending on smb.conf. What if you mess with name resolve order in your global section of smb.conf? Joel On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:30:30AM -0500, David A. Bandel wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I looked through the archives, but didn't see anything like this. I have a network with a mix of Win95, Win98, and WinME clients (and one Linux system w/ Samba server version 2.2.2). All systems belong to a workgroup called Oteima. All Win95 and Win98 clients see all other systems (including the Linux box) in one list. However, a couple of systems (notably the WinME systems) see _two_ Oteima workgroups. Problem is, the Samba server, using nmblookup can find _all_ systems, but using smbclient can only connect to the Windoze systems listed in one Oteima workgroup, but get a connection failed when trying to connect to systems in the other Oteima workgroup. I very methodically checked using nmblookup and sbmclient whether I could see/connect to every system. [root@appgen root]# nmblookup caja querying caja on 192.168.5.255 192.168.5.42 caja00 [root@appgen root]# smbclient //caja/c added interface ip=192.168.5.50 bcast=192.168.5.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Connection to caja failed if I could resolve _why_ some Win systems have _two_ Oteima workgoups (one to which I can connect to _all_ listed systems and one to which I cannot connect to any) I could resolve this dilemna. I've tried: changing workgroup name (all lowercase, all uppercase, mixed upper/lower case); encrypt passwds yes/no. Changing protocol mins and maxs (from CORE to NT1). I'm running out of ideas. Any and all suggestions welcome. David A. Bandel - -- Focus on the dream, not the competition. -- Nemesis Racing Team motto -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE95iiG3uVcotqGMQcRAsIbAKCvG630vfFHmod71Hyh+IpkUGfVQwCgwuog nbjz45yzhN5ygZ3HDFPMmJA= =xJ+8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Another Samba+ACLs thread
$ setfacl -m DOMAIN+andrewfu:rwx myfile setfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near character 1 I had a similar issue on my Debian box. It seemed that setfacl didn't care for special characters. I changed the separator character to - (dash) instead of + or \ and it worked fine. It looks like that error (invalid argument) is coming up any time the username is not found on the system. This of course includes anything added onto it - like DOMAIN+name, DOMAIN-name, etc. Also, the only mention of a separator that I see in smb.conf is in relation to winbind, which I'm not using at present (need real users due to ownership of files; I'm using add user script instead). Should I in fact be using winbind? If so, how does it fit into the picture? -- ANDREW FUREY [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sysadmin/developer for Terminus. Providing online networks of Australian lawyers (http://www.ilaw.com.au) and Linux experts (http://www.linuxconsultants.com.au) for instant help! Disclaimer: http://www.terminus.net.au/disclaimer.html. GCS L+++ P++ t++ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Access Linux PC from other windows machines in the WorkGroup
Dear Sir, I want to access my Linux shared folder from other windows PC's in the same work group. I have installed TurboLinux7.0 in my PC. It has got samba server shipped with it. I made settings in the /etc/smb.conf file. Now we can see my machine from the network neighbourhood of other machines in the workgroup. But when we try to access the linux PC from other windows machine, it gives the following error message The account is not authorised to login from this machine Please give me more information on this. Thanks BestRegards, Raks __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] system error 64, win xp and samba
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 04:59:42PM +, John H Terpstra wrote: On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, mlh wrote: Just so that it gets into the archives for future googlers: If you get 'system error 64' on a windows xp machine trying to connect to samba, then make sure you have nothing running on port 445. I had an apache ssl instance running on that port. Really? The well known port for that is 443. Yeah, I know. I have a whole bunch of apache servers, of potentially different versions, hence different ports. (rather than use virtual servers) The first uses 80+443, the second 81+444, the third ... well you can guess :-) Doh! Had to scratch my head a bit over it. XP doesn't actually need anything to be on 445, it just gets confused and gives up if there is. Port 445 is the port Win2K and WinXP use for netbiosless SMB. It is the correct well known TCP port that Microsoft have registered for the purpose. Does any present or future Samba plan to use it too? (I presume the answer is yes for future, but I think no for the present.?) Matt PS. I may go to virtual ips for my multiple apaches but that's enough on apache for this list. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Access Linux PC from other windows machines in the WorkGroup
It looks like you probably need to read some beginner's introduction to Samba. To answer your question, we'd need a copy of your smb.conf file, at least. You also might add information such as: 1. Unix version used as Samba host. 2. Version of Samba in use. 3. Is your Windows network a workgroup or domain? 4. Version of Windows the client is running. My guess is that you didn't set up your accounts on the Samba server using smbpasswd. Try: # smbpasswd -a username (run as root user), where username is the name of an account on the Samba host (Unix system), and is used by the Windows user to log on. - Jay Ts - On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 08:41:27PM -0800, Rakesh Rajan wrote: Dear Sir, I want to access my Linux shared folder from other windows PC's in the same work group. I have installed TurboLinux7.0 in my PC. It has got samba server shipped with it. I made settings in the /etc/smb.conf file. Now we can see my machine from the network neighbourhood of other machines in the workgroup. But when we try to access the linux PC from other windows machine, it gives the following error message The account is not authorised to login from this machine Please give me more information on this. Thanks BestRegards, Raks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Need a cron script written
I do this manually: smbmount //Beverley/C /home/data pwd: insert pwd cp -ruv /home/samba/public /home/data smbumount /home/data This lets me do the following: make a copy of all my samba shares on the server to a client named Beverley C drive. ruv does the following recursive (all subdirectories and subfolders) unchanged (only write over when newer) verbose pwd: insert pwd would be my password for that share (secret!!) the only problem is I can not get cp to do this quietly or without input, even dropping the v makes me confirm each write. I need to unmount the share at end of backup. Any ideas of doing it another way much appreciated. I currently run a cron job, tar -cvfpP /dev/st0 /home/samba/public weekly to save all my samba server shares to tape. best, kevin brown -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Build problem - 2.2.7 (latest)
I'm trying to build samba 2.2.7 (latest tarball) downloaded about 2 hours ago. System is SunFire 3800, Solaris 8 (Generic_108528-16) and gcc 3.2 (downloaded from Sunfreeware). Gcc -v output is: Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.2/specs Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --disable-nls Thread model: posix gcc version 3.2 Here is the last few output lines from configure: checking whether or not getgroups returns EGID too many times... no checking whether struct passwd has pw_comment... yes checking whether struct passwd has pw_age... yes checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt... yes checking whether to use included popt... no checking configure summary... configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config Any ideas? I've never had a configure problem before. Michael Lightfoot Unix Consultant ISG Host Systems Comcare +61 2 62750680 NOTICE: This e-mail message and attachments may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use or disclose any information in the message or attachments. If received in error, please notify the sender by return email immediately. Comcare does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Build problem - 2.2.7 (latest) - further info
Should have included the relevant config.log output with my last
message:
configure:14155: checking configure summary
configure:14164: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 conftest.c -lsec -lgen -lsocket -lnsl -ldl
-lpopt 15
configure: failed program was:
#line 14160 configure
#include confdefs.h
#include ./tests/summary.c
The relevant lines from the configure script are:
# final configure stuff
echo $ac_n checking configure summary... $ac_c 16
echo configure:14155: checking configure summary 5
if test $cross_compiling = yes; then
echo configure: warning: cannot run when cross-compiling 12
else
cat conftest.$ac_ext EOF
#line 14160 configure
#include confdefs.h
#include ${srcdir-.}/tests/summary.c
EOF
if { (eval echo configure:14164: \$ac_link\) 15; (eval $ac_link)
25; } test -s conftest${ac
_exeext} (./conftest; exit) 2/dev/null
then
echo $ac_tyes 16
else
echo configure: failed program was: 5
cat conftest.$ac_ext 5
rm -fr conftest*
{ echo configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config 12; exit
1; }; exit 1;
fi
rm -fr conftest*
fi
Michael Lightfoot
Unix Consultant
ISG Host Systems
Comcare
+61 2 62750680
NOTICE: This e-mail message and attachments may contain confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use or
disclose any information in the message or attachments. If received in
error, please notify the sender by return email immediately. Comcare
does not waive any confidentiality or privilege.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] need smbmount cron script
I do this manually: smbmount //Beverley/C /home/data pwd: insert pwd cp -ruv /home/samba/public /home/data smbumount /home/data This lets me do the following: make a copy of all my samba shares on the server to a client named Beverley C drive. ruv does the following recursive (all subdirectories and subfolders) unchanged (only write over when newer) verbose pwd: insert pwd would be my password for that share (secret!!) the only problem is I can not get cp to do this quietly or without input, even dropping the v makes me confirm each write. I need to unmount the share at end of backup. Any ideas of doing it another way much appreciated. I currently run a cron job, tar -cvfpP /dev/st0 /home/samba/public weekly to save all my samba server shares to tape. best, kevin brown -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Build problem - 2.2.7 (latest)
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 16:47, Lightfoot.Michael wrote: I'm trying to build samba 2.2.7 (latest tarball) downloaded about 2 hours ago. System is SunFire 3800, Solaris 8 (Generic_108528-16) and gcc 3.2 (downloaded from Sunfreeware). Gcc -v output is: Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.2/specs Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --disable-nls Thread model: posix gcc version 3.2 Here is the last few output lines from configure: checking whether or not getgroups returns EGID too many times... no checking whether struct passwd has pw_comment... yes checking whether struct passwd has pw_age... yes checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt... yes checking whether to use included popt... no checking configure summary... configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config Any ideas? I've never had a configure problem before. It usually means that the 'summary' is unable to link. Yes, it really should be made clearer... Dive into the configure logs, and try to see what the link line becomes. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Samba] samba server for windows (I know it defeats theobject...)
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 21:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, is there a samba server for windows that UNIX samba clients can access. I know this wouldn't make sense and windows mounting a unix SMB exported directory would make so much more sense but a colleague swears that a windows samba server exists and it is proving hard to demonstrate its absence! I'm sure he is really talking about an NFS server for windows... Samba would run under windows, except that we do not currently support the locking primitives that windows uses. (This would naturally imply using cygwin). In fact, there is rumour that an old version of Samba had been ported there at one point - it's certainly possible, given the existence of the OS/2 port. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Samba] Need a cron script written
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Kevin Brown wrote: I do this manually: smbmount //Beverley/C /home/data pwd: insert pwd cp -ruv /home/samba/public /home/data smbumount /home/data This lets me do the following: make a copy of all my samba shares on the server to a client named Beverley C drive. ruv does the following recursive (all subdirectories and subfolders) unchanged (only write over when newer) verbose pwd: insert pwd would be my password for that share (secret!!) If you change this to: smbmount //Beverley/C /home/data -o,username=KevinBrown,password=SECRET You shouldn't get prompted for a password. the only problem is I can not get cp to do this quietly or without input, even dropping the v makes me confirm each write. try /bin/cp -a /home/samba/public /home/data I need to unmount the share at end of backup. Any ideas of doing it another way much appreciated. I currently run a cron job, tar -cvfpP /dev/st0 /home/samba/public weekly to save all my samba server shares to tape. Yours Tony Jan 22-25 2003 Linux.Conf.AUhttp://linux.conf.au/ The Australian Linux Technical Conference! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8
Check you UTP cable and driver for nic. UTP must have pairs 12 36 connected not 12 34 (if this then only one way work 100Mb) - Original Message - From: Justin Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 9:24 PM Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8 I have tried your advice, infact I removed everything but the necessary server information and still no difference. read speed still very good, write speed still way below par. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Justin Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 1:33 PM Subject: Re: [SAMBA] config/performance problem on solaris 8 You know the default tuning parameters we ship should just work, especially in 2.2.7. Try removing the following paramters and seeing if it helps. Jeremy. On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:41:25AM -0600, Justin Richards wrote: [global] read size = 65535 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=16384 SO_RCVBUF=16384 max connections = 150 write cache size = 65535 read prediction = yes max xmit = 65535 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Connection to a Remote XP Box
Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote: Win98 SE (F) Disk mount -t smbfs -o username=somename,password=somepass //s.o.m.e.i.p/F /chris/ 21287: session request to s.o.m.e.i.p. failed (Called name not present) 21287: session request to s failed (Called name not present) 21287: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnosuchshare (You specified an invalid share name) SMB connection failed I think this is a fairly easy problem. The name of the share is not 'F' but 'Win98 SE (F)' if I'm not mistaken. That is why you are getting the error about no such share. -- Um, can you repeat the part of the stuff where you said all about the things? - Homer Simpson -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
spoolname smbprn.XXXXXX.aaaaaa
Hello There, since a samba update from 2.0.5. to 2.2.5 (AIX) we have new spooling names like smbprn.XX.aa instead of the previous NT file name. We are printing in a shell for creating pdf - files and after that we are searching for the master document in our PDM system to check in the pdf as a scondary file format. But of course with the new spool file name we lost all information about the file and can't identify it any more in the database. Is there a way to get the old filename back? We kept the smb.conf unchanged. Regards, F. Schmieg
problem with Samba 2.2.3a (Suse dist)
Hi, I have a problem with Samba 2.2.3a (Suse dist). We have a server , with = DHCP and Samba.We have migrated from Caldera 2.1.The clients are = Win95/98.All the thinghs seems to be Ok, but in a few minutes , the = clients lost the share units in Samba if nobody are using the units.I = modified samba.conf with: [global] deadtime=3D0 keep alive =3D 30 in order to resolve the problem, but I can=B4t do it. The clients lost = the conection even if some programs have files open. If you click over = the unit with the Explorer , reconnect it easily. We don=B4t have net = problems: ping work nice, and the network wires are tested and ok.We = dont have any problems with the old dist (Caldera). I use the same samba.conf with Suse dist that Caldera in order to test = , but nothing change... Any idea? Thanks /---/ The harware are: Pentium IV 2,5=20 QDI Platinix 2D/533 Mhz 512 Mb DDR Ram=20 Hd Seagate 40 Gb 7200 rpm Barracuda. The samba.conf file are: # /etc/samba/smb.conf ist the main samba configuration file. Cf. the # manual page of smb.conf and the included documantation in # /usr/share/doc/packages/samba in order to understand the options # listed here and many more features. # # Lines in this example which starts with ; and # are ignored comment # ones. # indicates a comment and ; a deactivated example line. # # We suggest to use the command 'testparm' after any changes you made. # # Copyright (c) 1999 - 2001 SuSE GmbH Nuernberg, Germany. # # Please send bugfixes or comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. # [global] workgroup =3D OFICINA server string =3D TLC SMB SERVER log file =3D /var/log/samba/smb.%m.%U debug level=3D2 max log size =3D 50 security =3D user encrypt passwords =3D yes smb passwd file =3D /etc/samba/smbpasswd username map =3D /etc/samba/smbusers socket options =3D TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = SO_RCVBUF=3D4096 SO_SNDBUF=3D4096 getwd cache =3D yes read size =3D 65536 read prediction =3D yes read raw =3D no write raw =3D no max xmit =3D 16384 deadtime=3D0 keep alive =3D 30 local master =3D yes os level =3D 33 domain master =3D yes preferred master =3D yes domain logons =3D yes logon script =3D %U.bat include =3D /etc/samba/%m.conf include =3D /etc/samba/%U.conf include =3D /etc/samba/generic.conf default case =3D upper case sensitive =3D no # Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT) # %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username # You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below ; logon path =3D \\%L\Profiles\%U ; wins support =3D yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but = NOT=20 both ; wins server =3D w.x.y.z # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. ; wins proxy =3D yes # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy =3D no # Case Preservation can be handy - system default is _no_ # NOTE: These can be set on a per share basis ; preserve case =3D no ; short preserve case =3D no # Default case is normally upper case for all DOS files ; default case =3D lower # Be very careful with case sensitivity - it can break things! ; case sensitive =3D no #=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D Share Definitions = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D [homes] comment =3D Home Directories ; this gives access to a 'Public' sub-directory in each user's home... ; (it is named 'public' as it is intended to be used by other sharing ; technologies (like NetWare, appletalk) too and may get disclosed due ; to weak protocols! -- hmm, even less secure than NFS? :) path =3D /apps/users/%U browseable =3D no writable =3D yes create mask =3D 0750 # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain = Logons [netlogon] comment =3D Samba Network Logon Service path =3D /logon guest ok =3D no writable =3D no browsable =3D no root preexec =3D /usr/bin/hala.pl %U %h # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory ;[Profiles] ; path =3D /home/samba/profiles ; browseable =3D no ; guest ok =3D yes # A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in # the "users" group [tot$] comment =3D disco_red volume =3D linux path =3D /apps browseable =3D yes public =3D yes writable =3D yes printable =3D no create mask =3D 0777 [contabilidad$] comment =3D contabilidad volume =3D contabilidad path =3D /apps/contabilidad browseable =3D no public =3D yes
2nd attempt: Modify location of printerdriverfiles
Hi! Maybe this time someone can give me a hint - or is my english that bad - so that nobody can catch the point - or my question is posted to the false list? Please each answer is welcome! Thank you! Hello, Samba-Team, hello samba-freaks! My question/problem: I like to use a samba-server as printer-server for about 500 users with ~ 40 different printers. The client OS is NT4 or XP. The problem I encountered is that there are printerdrivers out there which use for different models dlls with the same name but the dlls are not compatible - great!! - ! So only the last installed printer works flawless, because the dll for the other model is overwritten during driverinstall. My question: Is there a tool, which allows save tempering with the *.tdb, to change the path to the driverfiles or to change the behavior to rpc getdriverinfo? This way it would be possible to create an own driver-directory-structur and all those printerdriver related problems are gone... Greetings Ralf Btw.: Redhat 8.0 and latest Samba. Calling the printermanufactor is hopeless. The only answer I got is: This must be a problem with your OS... thanks for your help. :( Greetings Ralf
Re: 2nd attempt: Modify location of printerdriverfiles
That would change nearly nothnig, because the printer drivers will be copyed in the same structure on the client and there you will find the same naming problem. It is a known windows problem (just faces some day ago with drivers for 2 HP laser printers on a windows 98 :-/) If the Printer Manufacturer tell you so she is both right an wrong. Right it is an OS problem, A windows OS problem. Wrong the manufacter must know this issue and try not to make drivers with overlapping names. However you may try just a workaround. If any of your clients will use only one printer, you may try some symlink + macro expansion tricks to use different directories, but it may not work or corrupt badly your printer settings and prnting related tdb file, so at your own risk: - you may use a macro expansion on the print$ share path and then make a number of directories that match that macro expansion eg: path = /usr/share/samba/%G/drivers and have a pool of printers per group or other parameter. Simo. On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 11:21, Kätzler, Ralf wrote: Hi! Maybe this time someone can give me a hint - or is my english that bad - so that nobody can catch the point - or my question is posted to the false list? Please each answer is welcome! Thank you! Hello, Samba-Team, hello samba-freaks! My question/problem: I like to use a samba-server as printer-server for about 500 users with ~ 40 different printers. The client OS is NT4 or XP. The problem I encountered is that there are printerdrivers out there which use for different models dlls with the same name but the dlls are not compatible - great!! - ! So only the last installed printer works flawless, because the dll for the other model is overwritten during driverinstall. My question: Is there a tool, which allows save tempering with the *.tdb, to change the path to the driverfiles or to change the behavior to rpc getdriverinfo? This way it would be possible to create an own driver-directory-structur and all those printerdriver related problems are gone... Greetings Ralf Btw.: Redhat 8.0 and latest Samba. Calling the printermanufactor is hopeless. The only answer I got is: This must be a problem with your OS... thanks for your help. :( Greetings Ralf -- Simo Sorce - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xsec s.r.l. via Durando 10 Ed. G - 20158 - Milano tel. +39 02 2399 7130 - fax: +39 02 700 442 399 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE RE: 2nd attempt: Modify location of printerdriverfiles
I think the workaround will not work. I can´t predict which user on which machine will use which printer. Our users have in most case max. two networkprinters connected - for our luck long physikal ways prevent the need to connect to more printers. We have created a small script which erases all printerrelated registry-entries and files on the client. A user or admin can run this script and the client is clean for a new printer-installation. This way we work around the naming-problem on the client. (The users *theoretical* know which printers cannot be installed at the same time). Of course this works not on the printserver :)). If there is no other solution, we have to fight another skirmish with HP ... maybe we can convince them to take more care when naming there files.. ... on the other hand maybe someone is happy to implement the needed variables to the samba-core?? :) The moto would be: Power is nothing without control Simo: Thanks for your answer. Have a nice day. Ralf -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Simo Sorce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. November 2002 11:34 An: Kätzler, Ralf Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: 2nd attempt: Modify location of printerdriverfiles That would change nearly nothnig, because the printer drivers will be copyed in the same structure on the client and there you will find the same naming problem. It is a known windows problem (just faces some day ago with drivers for 2 HP laser printers on a windows 98 :-/) If the Printer Manufacturer tell you so she is both right an wrong. Right it is an OS problem, A windows OS problem. Wrong the manufacter must know this issue and try not to make drivers with overlapping names. However you may try just a workaround. If any of your clients will use only one printer, you may try some symlink + macro expansion tricks to use different directories, but it may not work or corrupt badly your printer settings and prnting related tdb file, so at your own risk: - you may use a macro expansion on the print$ share path and then make a number of directories that match that macro expansion eg: path = /usr/share/samba/%G/drivers and have a pool of printers per group or other parameter. Simo.
Re: RE RE: 2nd attempt: Modify location of printerdriverfiles
Uhm not sure either if this will work, but you could try to use %S as substitution This way you may have a directory for each printer name ... of course if you rename a printer you may get into troubles, but it is unlikely that you like changing printer names every day :-) Here it is a list of macros you may think to try: These substitutions are mostly noted in the descriptions below, but there are some general substitutions which apply whenever they might be relevant. These are: %S the name of the current service, if any. %P the root directory of the current service, if any. %u user name of the current service, if any. %g primary group name of %u. %U session user name (the user name that the client wanted, not necessarily the same as the one they got). %G primary group name of %U. %H the home directory of the user given by %u. %v the Samba version. %h the Internet hostname that Samba is running on. %m the NetBIOS name of the client machine (very use- ful). %L the NetBIOS name of the server. This allows you to change your config based on what the client calls you. Your server can have a dual personality. Note that this paramater is not available when Samba listens on port 445, as clients no longer send this information %M the Internet name of the client machine. %N the name of your NIS home directory server. This is obtained from your NIS auto.map entry. If you have not compiled Samba with the --with-automount option then this value will be the same as %L. %p the path of the service's home directory, obtained from your NIS auto.map entry. The NIS auto.map entry is split up as %N:%p. %R the selected protocol level after protocol negotia- tion. It can be one of CORE, COREPLUS, LANMAN1, LANMAN2 or NT1. %d The process id of the current server process. %a the architecture of the remote machine. Only some are recognized, and those may not be 100% reliable. It currently recognizes Samba, WfWg, Win95, WinNT and Win2k. Anything else will be known as UNKNOWN. If it gets it wrong then sending a level 3 log to [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] should allow it to be fixed. %I The IP address of the client machine. %T the current date and time. %$(envvar) The value of the environment variable envar. There are some quite creative things that can be done with these substitutions and other smb.conf options. On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 12:16, Kätzler, Ralf wrote: I think the workaround will not work. I can´t predict which user on which machine will use which printer. Our users have in most case max. two networkprinters connected - for our luck long physikal ways prevent the need to connect to more printers. We have created a small script which erases all printerrelated registry-entries and files on the client. A user or admin can run this script and the client is clean for a new printer-installation. This way we work around the naming-problem on the client. (The users *theoretical* know which printers cannot be installed at the same time). Of course this works not on the printserver :)). If there is no other solution, we have to fight another skirmish with HP ... maybe we can convince them to take more care when naming there files.. ... on the other hand maybe someone is happy to implement the needed variables to the samba-core?? :) The moto would be: Power is nothing without control Simo: Thanks for your answer. Have a nice day. Ralf -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Simo Sorce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. November 2002 11:34 An: Kätzler, Ralf Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: 2nd attempt: Modify location of printerdriverfiles That would change nearly nothnig, because the printer drivers will be copyed in the same structure on the client and there you will find the same naming problem. It is a known windows problem (just faces some day ago with drivers for 2 HP laser printers on a windows 98 :-/) If the Printer Manufacturer tell you so she is both right an wrong. Right it is an OS problem, A windows OS problem. Wrong the manufacter must know this issue and try not to make drivers with overlapping names. However you may try just a workaround. If any of your clients will use only one printer, you may try some symlink + macro expansion tricks
Re: 2nd attempt: Modify location of printerdriverfiles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Kätzler, Ralf wrote: I like to use a samba-server as printer-server for about 500 users with ~ 40 different printers. The client OS is NT4 or XP. The problem I encountered is that there are printerdrivers out there which use for different models dlls with the same name but the dlls are not compatible Can you give more details on how you came up with this conclusion? - great!! - ! So only the last installed printer works flawless, because the dll for the other model is overwritten during driverinstall. My This is basically a Windows design flaw which driver manufacturers have to very careful with. question: Is there a tool, which allows save tempering with the *.tdb, to change the path to the driverfiles or to change the behavior to rpc getdriverinfo? This way it would be possible to create an own driver-directory-structur and all those printerdriver related problems are gone... No. Not really, but what you would need to do is to modify the DRIVER_INFO_3 structure to reflect where you placed the files. Calling the printermanufactor is hopeless. The only answer I got is: This must be a problem with your OS... thanks for your help. :( Was this HP? If so contact me off list. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE95iMjIR7qMdg1EfYRAmkWAJ9zynR81D2ZwbabzanjNkun01J3QACfdYAA fIhCGZWa/nmZXLFTXUNvA8U= =9lxJ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Encrypted Passwords Restricting Logon Attempts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Jim Morris wrote: Now their corporate headquarters has identified this issue (unlimited login attempts allowed) as the primary violation on a recent security audit of the network in this branch office of the company. I think they have only given the local MIS guy a few days to achieve compliance. From a personal standpoint, 3.0 is soon enough. For the company involved, I think they may end up switching to plaintext passwords as a temporary solution. I've had a conversation with them today, and it sounds like the local guys are willing to do that for the short-term. That's funny! Switching to plain text passwords to be in compliance with a security audit :-) I'm choking on the irony of it all! cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE95iQMIR7qMdg1EfYRAgZVAJ4mckVPwZGbpTwhz5jZ8mCO4koxiACg7KcZ lyOdKNmyK3kjYpNcq9ZNr+w= =qQcu -END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: tracking user logins
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 19:55 PM, Jim Morris wrote: I must say that I know of no NT/2000 option to allow only login from one client PC, although I recall Netware having such an option. Agreed again. (I think you meant something different from the facility John Terpestra referred to - on NT/2K you can specify which machines, perhaps only one, that a user account can use, but you can't specify Maximum number of concurrent sessions; on Netware you can do both.) Giving the growing presence of Samba in the large enterprise, with more and more companies becoming security conscious as time goes forward, we are going to hit these type issues more and more. Mmm. I've only *just* managed to demonstrate to the Powers-That-Be around here the full horror of an unswitched LAN with unencrypted passwords and a sniffer ... so _now_ changes are underway. Password encryption *with* failed login tallying *will* be part of security policy .. ... What is needed is an examination of the various security policies that can be setup in an NT/2000 Server environment, so that a list of such items that are appropriate to a Samba environment can be built. I'd just like to add a vote for another item for this list - something which can be done on Netware, VMS, and on some Unixen, but not NT/2K (AFAIK) - allow a password expiry grace period to be configured if desired - a period of time after a password has expired, during which a user account can still login but is forced straight into a password-change dialog. This allows for those occasions when (e.g.) someone is away for a whole month, during which their password expires. ... I would be glad to help in this effort in any way I can, including documentation and code. Likewise, but only for documentation .. Nick Boyce EDS Southwest Solution Centre, Bristol, UK
Re: tracking user logins
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 08:36 AM, Boyce, Nick wrote: Agreed again. (I think you meant something different from the facility John Terpestra referred to - on NT/2K you can specify which machines, perhaps only one, that a user account can use, but you can't specify Maximum number of concurrent sessions; on Netware you can do both.) Yes - what I was talking about, and the original poster in this thread, was restricting the NUMBER of logons, not necessarily where the logons come from. Mmm. I've only *just* managed to demonstrate to the Powers-That-Be around here the full horror of an unswitched LAN with unencrypted passwords and a sniffer ... so _now_ changes are underway. Password encryption *with* failed login tallying *will* be part of security policy .. Well - sounds like you are going to put yourself into the same situation I have been talking about in the thread 'Encrypted Passwords Restricting Logon Attempts' over the past day or so. If you have followed that thread, you know that there is no way to do the tallying with current versions of Samba. I implemented PAM support for the company I am consulting for in order to expire passwords every 60 days - PAM allows for no grace period, but does allow for a warning period. During the logon script execution on the PC's, I implemented a process to throw up the user's web browser if they are within that warning period, prior to expiration. They are given a change to go to a web page and change their Samba password, or told that they can do it through the Windows Control Panel as well. I would have just invoked the Control Panel option to change passwords, but did not know how to do so. Plus, there are Win95/98/NT/2000 boxes to support, and each one has a different way to set the Windows networking password. ... What is needed is an examination of the various security policies that can be setup in an NT/2000 Server environment, so that a list of such items that are appropriate to a Samba environment can be built. I'd just like to add a vote for another item for this list - something which can be done on Netware, VMS, and on some Unixen, but not NT/2K (AFAIK) - allow a password expiry grace period to be configured if desired - a period of time after a password has expired, during which a user account can still login but is forced straight into a password-change dialog. This allows for those occasions when (e.g.) someone is away for a whole month, during which their password expires. That sounds great. Right now, the problem they are having is that many PC's are left on for days or weeks at a time. Or people will be on vacation when their password expires. So in those cases, they suddenly loose access to network resources, without seeing the expiration warning, since that is only displayed during the logon process. Having a chance to change the password on the next logon after it expires would be great. PAM won't give me this flexibility right now. -- Jim Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Smb passwords 8 chars
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Olaf Flebbe wrote: A samba server with encrypted paawords on Solaris8 does not correctly handle passwords containing more than eight characters. A local smbclient can correctly handle this situation, but NT 4.0 and W2K cannot connect to a share protected with encrypted password 9 chars long. The newly ported LynxOS Server shows the same problem ;-) Make sure REPLACE_GETPASS is defined in config.h. I tested this on Solaris 8 prior to release and everything was working fine. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE95iRrIR7qMdg1EfYRAjVtAJ43/SJUdfNMX5RIEgjMMfiHjsnFdACdGZCn kIbA7CJxUJG89M2hzVyJ/Z0= =UE/f -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Smb passwords 8 chars
Make sure REPLACE_GETPASS is defined in config.h. I tested this on Solaris 8 prior to release and everything was working fine. cheers, jerry -- Hewlett-Packard- http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team -- http://www.samba.org GnuPG Key http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ISBN 0-672-32269-2 SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there. --John Cusack - Grosse Point Blank (1997) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQE95iRrIR7qMdg1EfYRAjVtAJ43/SJUdfNMX5RIEgjMMfiHjsnFdACdGZCn kIbA7CJxUJG89M2hzVyJ/Z0= =UE/f -END PGP SIGNATURE- OH forgive me... The solaris server I tested was 2.2.4. And yes, it works correctly with 2.2.7. I tried the REPLACE_GETPASS with lynxos, and it seems to work now. Thank you very much. Olaf -- Dr. Olaf FlebbePhone +49 (0)7071-9457-254 Software Solutions FAX +49 (0)7071-9457-211 science + computing ag Hagellocher Weg 73-75 D-72070 TuebingenEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The amount of work to be done increases in proportion to the amount of work already completed.
Re: samba on lynxos 3.0
Unfortunatly there is no crypt() available on Lynxos. So you have to work around this issue somehow. With a little work, you can probably port the FreeBSD version of crypt.c to your system. The FreeBSD license should not give you any problems. Hi, The freebsd sources are not particulary useful because the DES algorithm seems to be missing in libcrypt. Anyway, I used the fcrypt.c from the libdes package. Olaf -- Dr. Olaf FlebbePhone +49 (0)7071-9457-254 Software Solutions FAX +49 (0)7071-9457-211 science + computing ag Hagellocher Weg 73-75 D-72070 TuebingenEmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The amount of work to be done increases in proportion to the amount of work already completed.
Re: spoolname smbprn.XXXXXX.aaaaaa
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 09:27:08AM +0100, Schmieg Friedemann wrote: Hello There, since a samba update from 2.0.5. to 2.2.5 (AIX) we have new spooling names like smbprn.XX.aa instead of the previous NT file name. We are printing in a shell for creating pdf - files and after that we are searching for the master document in our PDM system to check in the pdf as a scondary file format. But of course with the new spool file name we lost all information about the file and can't identify it any more in the database. Is there a way to get the old filename back? We kept the smb.conf unchanged. The NT filename is still being stored in the printing tdb, but isn't exposed to the filesystem I'm afraid. You'd need to hack the printing/printing.c source to do this, sorry. Jeremy.
DOMAIN SID
Hi ! Where the DOMAIN SID is stored when the LDAP backend is used ? greetz boka --- Hackman i De Vito poka Ci, co znaczy prawdziwa mio... do pienidzy! SKOK w kinach - od 29 listopada http://film.wp.pl/p/film.html?id=1782
Kerberos login sniffer and cracker for Windows 2000/XP (fwd)
Hy, This could be useful. Haven't tried it thou'.. Regards, Achim Dreyer -- A. Dreyer, Senior SysAdmin (UNIXNetwork) / Internet Security Consultant -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 07:06:15 +0100 From: Arne Vidstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Kerberos login sniffer and cracker for Windows 2000/XP Hi all, I've coded a simple Kerberos login sniffer and cracker for Windows 2000/XP that you might find useful. You can find it for download at: http://ntsecurity.nu/toolbox/kerbcrack/ Regards /Arne
Re: unsubscribe me please
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 05:44:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unsubscribe me please You can easily do it yourself using web interface at http://lists.samba.org if you don't like doing it via email. -- cheers, ++ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba / |__/
RE: Samba 3.0 alpha 20 problem with timegm-mktime() on HP-UX
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 11:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have already included a fix for this which you could try. See previous e-mail to Andrew and samba-technical attached. Hopefully this will be adopted as a fix at some stage. I got tridge to have a look at that patch, and he did some work on a replacement. (He didn't see exactly what it was trying to do). What was more interesting was seeing his IRC comments while coding a replacement... It seems POSIX is quite brain-dead in this area - ignoring daylight savings, normalising the time struct, and generally being 'helpful' :-). (Of course, GMT is never on daylight savings). Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: unsubscribe me please
View mail headers. List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-technical, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe Regards On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: unsubscribe me please -- Marcus Grando marcus at big dot univali dot br marcus at sbh dot eng dot br
2nd attempt: Modify location of printerdriverfiles
Message: 2 Subject: 2nd attempt: Modify location of printerdriverfiles Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:21:47 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi! Maybe this time someone can give me a hint - or is my english that bad - so that nobody can catch the point - or my question is posted to the false list? Please each answer is welcome! Thank you! Hello, Samba-Team, hello samba-freaks! My question/problem: I like to use a samba-server as printer-server for about 500 users with ~ 40 different printers. The client OS is NT4 or XP. The problem I encountered is that there are printerdrivers out there which use for different models dlls with the same name but the dlls are not compatible - great!! - ! So only the last installed printer works flawless, because the dll for the other model is overwritten during driverinstall. My question: Is there a tool, which allows save tempering with the *.tdb, to change the path to the driverfiles or to change the behavior to rpc getdriverinfo? This way it would be possible to create an own driver-directory-structur and all those printerdriver related problems are gone... Greetings Ralf Btw.: Redhat 8.0 and latest Samba. Calling the printermanufactor is hopeless. The only answer I got is: = This must be a problem with your OS... thanks for your help. [:(] Greetings Ralf Hi, Ralf, may I suggest a radically different approach to your problem? * Let the Windows Clients use a PostScript driver, to produce PostScript as their print output sent towards the Samba print server (just like any Linux or Unix Client would also use PostScript to send to the server...) * make the Unix printing subsystem which is underneath Samba convert the incoming PostScript files to the native print format of the target printers (would likely be PCL? I understand you have mainly HP models?) * You're afraid, that this would just mean a *Generic* PostScript driver for the clients? With no Simplex/Duplex selection, no paper tray choice? But you need them to be able to set up their jobs, ringing all the bells and whistles of the printers? -- Not possible with traditional spooling systems! -- But perfectly supported by CUPS (which uses PPD files to describe how to control the print options for PostScript and non-PostScript devices alike... CUPS PPDs are working perfectly on Windows clients who use Adobe PostScript drivers (or the new CUPS PostScript driver for Windows NT/2K/XP). Clients can use them to setup the job to their liking and CUPS will use the received job options to make the (PCL-, ESC/P- or PostScript-) printer behave as required. * You want to have the additional benefit of page count logging and accounting? In this case the CUPS PostScript driver is the best choice (better than the Adobe one). * You want to make the drivers downloadable for the clients? cupsaddsmb is your friend. It will setup the [print$] share on the Samba host to be ready to serve the clients for a point and print driver installation... What strings are attached?, I hear you asking... You are right, there are some. But, given the sheer CPU power you can buy nowadays in German supermarkets, these can be overcome easily. The strings: Well, if the CUPS/Samba side will have to print a *lot* onto 40 printers serving 500 users, you probably will need to set up a second server (which can do automatic load balancing with the first one, plus a degree of fail-over mechanism). Converting the incoming PostScript jobs, interpreting them for non-PostScript printers, amounts to the work of a RIP (Raster Image Processor) done in software. This requires more CPU and RAM than for the mere raw spooling task your current setup is solving... It all depends on the avarage and peak printing load the server should be able to handle If you want, I can point you to or give you more more info in private mail. Cheers, Kurt
Re: DOMAIN SID
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 11:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! Where the DOMAIN SID is stored when the LDAP backend is used ? it's in one of the tdb files... if you put a text file MACHINE.SID in your conf area it still gets imported (if i remember correctly) brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PATCH] add 'modules path' and handle 'configure --with-configdir' right
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:06:07AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about 'Re:
[PATCH] add 'modules path' and handle 'configure --with-configdir' right':
here's the next version of the patch. (it's now attached :-)
I've applied a part of your patch, but I'm waiting with the
lp_modules_dir() stuff until we've resolved the problems around the
new module system - the loading of charset modules and ab's comments.
I added --with-sambadatadir witch is default ${datadir}/samba (--with-fhs)
or ${datadir}
${datadir} is ${prefix}/share by default, so $(sambadatadir) is
${prefix}/share/samba or ${prefix}/share.
the valid.dat ... files are now installed to sambadatadir
I'm happy with this patch, but NOT with the name 'sambadatadir' DOES
ANYBODY HAVE ABETTER IDEA?
Need a new capslock key? ;-) Would the name datadir be ok to you - is
there anyone who has problems with putting the *.dat files not in the
libdir ?
How's your winsdb stuff btw?
Jelmer
msg04706/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: DOMAIN SID
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 01:23:31PM -0500, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote: On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 11:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! Where the DOMAIN SID is stored when the LDAP backend is used ? it's in one of the tdb files... secrets.tdb, namely. -- cheers, ++ |Rafal 'Mimir' Szczesniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |*BSD, GNU/Linux and Samba / |__/
Porting guide Samba 2.2.x - 3.0
Folks,
unfortunately I wasn't able to follow the 3.0 development nor this ML
very closely. Does a porting guide from 2.2.x to 3.0 exist?
I've just discovered that the following code
void send_message(pstring msg) {
[..]
unix_to_dos(msg);
len = strlen(msg);
if (!cli_message_start(cli, remote_machine, username, grp_id)) {
DEBUG(0,(message start: %s, cli_errstr(cli)));
return;
}
[..]
does not compile anymore with Samba 3.0 alpha 20, as the unix_to_dos
function seems to be removed. Any equivalent available?
Thanks!
best regards,
Rainer Link
OpenAntiVirus.org
Re: DOMAIN SID
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 05:23, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote: On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 11:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! Where the DOMAIN SID is stored when the LDAP backend is used ? it's in one of the tdb files... Just as a note - it has been proposed that in Samba HEAD we should store it in LDAP - I would like to see a 'domain' record that contains things like this, account policies - so we don't need to worry about TDBs for basic PDC/BDC operation. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
CVS update: samba/source
Date: Thu Nov 28 14:26:32 2002 Author: jelmer Update of /home/cvs/samba/source In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv17630 Modified Files: Makefile.in Log Message: Add PDBLIBDIR, just like VFSLIBDIR Revisions: Makefile.in 1.582 = 1.583 http://www.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/samba/source/Makefile.in?r1=1.582r2=1.583
