[Samba] My Samba 3.0beta1 stopped working as ADS member
I had a working Samba 3.0beta1 as ADS member of a W2003 server. My w2000 client could log in to the W2003 server and use services on Samba (home directory). Winbind is working. So I tried to re-do all my work again. And suddenly the w2k can use any services on Samba anymore. The output from the logfile tells me it's kerberos problem: [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 3] libads/kerberos_verify.c:(126) krb5_rd_req with auth failed (Bad encryption type) [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:(175) Failed to verify incoming ticket! [2003/06/18 08:35:03, 3] smbd/error.c:(94) error string = No such file or directory Winbind/wbinfo works as it should. I know what problem it is, but not WHY and not HOW to fix it ? /Patrik -- "In a world without fences who needs Gates" Patrik Gustavsson, Senior Technical Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +46 60 671540 http://glen.swedenMobile: +46 70 3551040 SUN MICROSYSTEMS Fax: +46 60 671550 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Winbind working with telnet but not thru X
Please help. Do I need to setup something else to make this work? Kind Regards ** This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain privileged information or confidential information or both. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] More Domain Groups
hi, > Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 2.1 > Samba 2.2.7 > OpenLDAP 2.0.25 Samba 3.0 - it will solve your problem with domaingroups! greetings, thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] New Samba Server
I'm currently looking at hardware specs for a samba server, its' job will be to hold general office files, cad / solidworks files along with approximately 40 outlook PST files that will be opened off the server. Here are the current specs I'm looking at.. AMD 2600XP Asus A7N8X Deluxe nVidia Serial ATA 2 x 512 MB PC2700 DDR 333 = 1024MB ASUS S520/Generic 52X CD-ROM (OEM) ASUS GrForce4 MX440-8X 64MB DDR D-Link DGE-550T 32/64-Bit PCI-Bus Copper (RJ45) 3Ware Escalade 7500-8 8 x 40gb ata-100 7200.7 drives 3Ware Escalade 7500-4 4 x 40gb ata-100 7200.7 drives The 7500-8 will be holding the office and cad / solid works files and the 7500-4 will be holding the PST files (I thought it was best to keep them on a separate controller cards.) Will this do a reasonable job in keeping up with a gigabit network? And is running PST files off the server like this a feasible option?? Any suggestions on hardware improvements would be appreciated as without the hardware to test with I'm purchasing quite blindly here :| Thanks Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] WinBind and gdm/login
Hi, I am currently trying to set up a RedHat 9 Linux client to authenticate against a Windows 2000 Active Directory server. Using the Winbind documentation I have successfully authenticated however I now have a problem with gdm. Jun 18 12:18:48 jerry pam_winbind[1192]: user 'AU+Bhales' granted acces Jun 18 12:18:48 jerry pam_winbind[1192]: user 'AU+Bhales' granted acces Jun 18 12:18:49 jerry gdm(pam_unix)[1192]: session opened for user AU+Bhales by (uid=0) Jun 18 12:18:49 jerry gdm[1202]: gdm_slave_session_start: User not allowed to log in Does anybody know why gdm_slave_session_start is not allowing me to login when pam_winbind has already authenticated me? Thanks, -- Brett Hales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Quickbooks revisited
What about file locking? I've run into lots of file locking problems, leading me to slowly just turn off file locking on several shares due to quickbooks. My user also reports that quickbooks is now slower since I took the server to linux/samba from the win2k server that was limited to . On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 16:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have QucikBooks on our network too. I have had a number of problems with > this crappy software. If my client actually wanted me too I'd rather create > my own accounting software with a better interface and a mysql backend but > that isn't going to happen. A few things with QuickBooks that I have > noticed that maybe will help. > > #1. QuickBooks in multi-user mode is much slower than in single user mode. > This is the (crappy) design of QuickBooks. It has to do with the fact that > QuickBooks checks everything everywhere when in multiuser mode to make sure > that no data gets corrupted (even though it has corrupted before). Our > company datafile is around ~180mb. > > #2. This problem will not be solved easily at all. Quickbooks appears to be > as slow as the weakest client link. In our case a P2 300 w/ 64 megs of ram. > Again, this has to do with #1. > > #3. Upgrading Quickbooks won't help. We've had many versions in the past > and currently run the "Enterprise Edition." It still can be as slow as a > turtle under certain operations. > > #4. My biggest complain with this software is that it requires it's users to > be "Power Users." Boy do I hate that With samba it's very difficult for > me to limit a Power user's ability and I have had people take advantge of it > repeatedly. Damn QuickBooks > > -Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] can't log in from windoz 2000
Are you by chance running Redhat with the default firewall blocking ports 137-139? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Mallasch Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] can't log in from windoz 2000 I have the same problem, but ping works fine. Browsing Network Neighborhood also displays Samba server & server string from smb.conf, but same WinDoze error as below is experienced. I can logon to Samba on server using smbclient locally however. Clues? ThX --paul On Tue, 13 May 2003, Webmaster wrote: > >i can see the linux share from windoz 2000 but can't log in ... > >here is the error from windoz (2000) > >C:\>net use x: \\ericred\www >System error 53 has occurred. What happens when you do: ping ericred from the Win2K machine? - John T. > >The network path was not found. > >I think problem is related to using encrypted passwords. I was using >unencrypted passwords before... > >can't see any errors in logs. any suggestions on how to track down the >problem would be appreciated. > >linux newbie _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Primary Domain Controller problems
Take a look here for the "Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON" message. http://tinyurl.com/ekri -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] Primary Domain Controller problems Sensitivity: Confidential Platform: RedHat 7.0 Samba version: 2.2.7a Client platforms Windows 2000 Pro SP3 Number of clients: 7 This is my SAMBA configuration file # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) # Creation Date: 2002/10/21 15:26:01 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SABER netbios name = SHADOW server string = SAMBA-PDC interfaces = eth0 192.168.1.13 encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u logon script = netlogon.bat logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U logon drive = H: logon home = \\%L\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 64 preferred master = True domain master = True dns proxy = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon write list = ntadmin [profiles] path = /home/samba/profiles read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [QB-bkup] path = /fileshare read only = No I am also have an old NT 4 SP6 server running on the same network. I have experienced the problems described below with both the server connected and with it completely shut down. SYMPTOMS: The clients roaming profiles are not updated correctly during the logon/logoff process. For instance, after logging onto the domain through a client machine the following behavior appears: 1) Place a folder on the Desktop. 2) Drag documents/pictures etc. into new folder 3) Log off 4) Log in again 5) Delete the new folder along with its content(put in trash AND empty trash) 6) Log off 7) Log in again 8) The folder which was just deleted is still on the Desktop. (Usually the folder has been completely emptied of all files ... BUT NOT Subfolders [if there were any]). When I look at the profiles folder on the SAMBA PDC [/home/samba/profiles//Desktop] I notice that the folder which should have been deleted is still there This PDC has been running since 10/02 and this problem has only surfaced within the last 2 months. The following is an excerpt from one of the samba logs for a machine account. [2003/06/17 08:54:30, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(248) main-floor (192.168.1.100) couldn't find service stephany_berry [2003/06/17 08:54:30, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(248) main-floor (192.168.1.100) couldn't find service stephany_berry [2003/06/17 09:34:39, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 09:34:39, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 09:38:02, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 09:38:02, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 09:42:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 09:42:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 10:02:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 10:02:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 10:05:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 10:05:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 10:08:39, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 10:08:39, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 10:16:08, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 10:16:08, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.
[Samba] can't log in from windoz 2000
I have the same problem, but ping works fine. Browsing Network Neighborhood also displays Samba server & server string from smb.conf, but same WinDoze error as below is experienced. I can logon to Samba on server using smbclient locally however. Clues? ThX --paul On Tue, 13 May 2003, Webmaster wrote: i can see the linux share from windoz 2000 but can't log in ... here is the error from windoz (2000) C:\>net use x: \\ericred\www System error 53 has occurred. What happens when you do: ping ericred from the Win2K machine? - John T. The network path was not found. I think problem is related to using encrypted passwords. I was using unencrypted passwords before... can't see any errors in logs. any suggestions on how to track down the problem would be appreciated. linux newbie _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems with timeouting connections
Hello all, I have the following problem both at my home network and at work. Once many cleints access a share, and traffic grows up extensively connections start to terminate themselves unexpectedly. It may be an open file or a locked share - either way it reflects a mesaage similar to oplock_break: receive_smb error (Success) oplock_break failed for file John's Publications/Show Price List 05-16-03.xls (dev = 900, inode = 8077379, file_id = 940). [2003/06/16 15:05:07, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(843) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. and then simply terminates the connection. This wouldn't be such a pain if it wasn't for the accounting software Peachtree Accounting. While it's running it needs to maintain a constant open connection to the data files. Once it senses something went wrong (a killed smbd) it crashes as well and you are forced to reboot the workstation with following data loss. I tried to play with the socket_options with no luck. Also this behaviour is extremely rare with 9x clients but happens almost once a week with nt/2k/xp clients. Included are parts of my smb.confs as well as verinfo. Thank you in advance for your help. Version 2.2.3a-6 for Debian --- [global] interfaces = eth1 bind interfaces only = yes invalid users = root log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m syslog = 0 security = share encrypt passwords = yes socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 64 - Version 3.0.0beta1-1 for Debian --- [global] interfaces = eth2 bind interfaces only = yes invalid users = root log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m syslog = 0 security = user encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 65 - -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] IP address for workstation
Doesn't this get stored in %I ? Joel On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:25:49AM -0300, rafael wrote: > > How get IP address the remote workstation in logon process (logon > process in Samba Server)? > > > > -- > Rafael, Claudio > == > Tribunal de Justiça - MG/Brazil > Sefor - Secretaria de Informática > > Sites de projetos mantidos: > - Pessoal: http://www.geocities.com/rafael_mcp > - Monesa GNU Linux: http://www.monesa-br.cjb.net > - Oportunidades(INFO): http://www.oportunidadesinformatica.hpg.com.br > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] cupsaddsmb NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_DEVICE
Hello, I am using cups-1.1.19final-1.deb and samba-2.2.3a. When I was working with cups-1.1.15 before, cupsaddsmb worked fine, but now with cups-1.1.19 it gives me: Running command: smbclient //localhost/print\$ -N -U'root%secret?' -c 'mkdir WIN40;put /var/spool/cups/tmp/3eef829eea1b8 WIN40/ps948esb.PPD;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADFONTS.MFM WIN40/ADFONTS.MFM;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.DRV WIN40/ADOBEPS4.DRV;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.HLP WIN40/ADOBEPS4.HLP;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/DEFPRTR2.PPD WIN40/DEFPRTR2.PPD;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/ICONLIB.DLL WIN40/ICONLIB.DLL;put /usr/share/cups/drivers/PSMON.DLL WIN40/PSMON.DLL;' added interface ip=157.182.194.119 bcast=157.182.194.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Domain=[CSEENTDOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.3a-12.3 for Debian] NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION making remote directory \WIN40 putting file /var/spool/cups/tmp/3eef829eea1b8 as \WIN40/ps948esb.PPD (8308.6 kb/s) (average 8308.8 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADFONTS.MFM as \WIN40/ADFONTS.MFM (18515.1 kb/s) (average 15963.6 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.DRV as \WIN40/ADOBEPS4.DRV (18806.2 kb/s) (average 17514.2 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ADOBEPS4.HLP as \WIN40/ADOBEPS4.HLP (14705.4 kb/s) (average 17227.6 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/DEFPRTR2.PPD as \WIN40/DEFPRTR2.PPD (6588.1 kb/s) (average 16810.4 kb/s) putting file /usr/share/cups/drivers/ICONLIB.DLL as \WIN40/ICONLIB.DLL (10909.1 kb/s) (average 16587.7 kb/s) /usr/share/cups/drivers/PSMON.DLL does not exist Running command: rpcclient localhost -N -U'root%secret?' -c 'adddriver "Windows 4.0" "ps948esb:ADOBEPS4.DRV:ps948esb.PPD:NULL:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:ADOBEPS4.DRV,ps948esb.PPD,ADOBEPS4.HLP,PSMON.DLL,ADFONTS.MFM,DEFPRTR2.PPD,ICONLIB.DLL"' session setup ok Domain=[CSEENTDOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.3a-12.3 for Debian] cmd = adddriver "Windows 4.0" "ps948esb:ADOBEPS4.DRV:ps948esb.PPD:NULL:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:ADOBEPS4.DRV,ps948esb.PPD,ADOBEPS4.HLP,PSMON.DLL,ADFONTS.MFM,DEFPRTR2.PPD,ICONLIB.DLL" adddriver "Windows 4.0" "ps948esb:ADOBEPS4.DRV:ps948esb.PPD:NULL:ADOBEPS4.HLP:PSMON.DLL:RAW:ADOBEPS4.DRV,ps948esb.PPD,ADOBEPS4.HLP,PSMON.DLL,ADFONTS.MFM,DEFPRTR2.PPD,ICONLIB.DLL" result was NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_DEVICE Running command: rpcclient localhost -N -U'root%secret?' -c 'setdriver ps948esb ps948esb' session setup ok Domain=[CSEENTDOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.3a-12.3 for Debian] cmd = setdriver ps948esb ps948esb setdriver ps948esb ps948esb result was NT code 0xc709 I checked the permissions on /var/spool/samba and other related directories, but couldn't resolve the error for 2 days now. Any help is highly appreciated. Shanti -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] More Domain Groups
You are going to have to use samba 3 for this... 2.2 doesn't support any other groups. Jim - Original Message - From: "Collins, Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:57 AM Subject: [Samba] More Domain Groups > Hi All: > > Stuff I'm using: > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 2.1 > Samba 2.2.7 > OpenLDAP 2.0.25 > > I followed the Idealx.org howto to build Samba+LDAP. I have a functioning, > replicating domain on my lab workbench right now. Then I began to explore > permissions on local shares, etc. when I discovered that to a Windows > client, the only domain groups that are available from a Samba PDC are > "Domain Users" and "Domain Admins". > > Upon further reading in the Idealx Howto, I see this comment: > > "In Samba 2.2, only 2 groups are dealed for Microsoft Windows workstations: > Domain Admins and Domain Users. All other groups are considered Local Unix > Groups. That means that a Samba user will only be a Domain User or Domain > Admin. If you only use Samba servers, there is no problem, but if you plan > to use Microsoft Windows NT member servers using groups, just forget about > it..." > > What this doesn't say is that the local Windows workstations will not be > able to see anything but users those two groups. I have several machines > sharing data and printers from the local machine. This simply isn't enough > groups for me to apply my scheme of local rights. > > Well, more correctly, this causes me a great deal of administrative overhead > maintaining local group definitions as things change. I've googled, read > more howtos than I care to mention and have basically fried my brain > looking for viable options to solve this problem. So I'm posing the > question to the group: > > Is there anyway I can get additional groups (which are available to Samba) > through to the local Windows workstations? > > -- > Kevin L. Collins, MCSE > Systems Manager > Nesbitt Engineering, Inc. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Quickbooks revisited
I have QucikBooks on our network too. I have had a number of problems with this crappy software. If my client actually wanted me too I'd rather create my own accounting software with a better interface and a mysql backend but that isn't going to happen. A few things with QuickBooks that I have noticed that maybe will help. #1. QuickBooks in multi-user mode is much slower than in single user mode. This is the (crappy) design of QuickBooks. It has to do with the fact that QuickBooks checks everything everywhere when in multiuser mode to make sure that no data gets corrupted (even though it has corrupted before). Our company datafile is around ~180mb. #2. This problem will not be solved easily at all. Quickbooks appears to be as slow as the weakest client link. In our case a P2 300 w/ 64 megs of ram. Again, this has to do with #1. #3. Upgrading Quickbooks won't help. We've had many versions in the past and currently run the "Enterprise Edition." It still can be as slow as a turtle under certain operations. #4. My biggest complain with this software is that it requires it's users to be "Power Users." Boy do I hate that With samba it's very difficult for me to limit a Power user's ability and I have had people take advantge of it repeatedly. Damn QuickBooks -Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Odd Folder issue.
Hello All, I have a reoccurring issue that has only started to appear recently with Samba. What we are seeing is the mass duplication of a folder within itself for something close to 30 iterations deep. Sometimes this will also move the data held within the folder one or two deep into the path. For Example... Let's call a share Data Data is mounted as the N: drive on all Windows worksations. Inside the N: Drive is a series of folders... N:\Incoming_Data N:\Jobs N:\Hold Inisde the "Jobs" directory there is a series of folders named after each job number series. Examples : 1100 1200 1300 1400, with subfolders within each of those listing the individual jobs themselves. Now, for some strange reason, sometimes the Jobs directory (it has happened to other directories as well) will replicate within itself normally moving all data directly held within it down two or three directories, yet it will continue to replicate the "Jobs" folder within itself for something like 20 to 30 iterations. Example (ASCI Approximation of the tree) - Data on 'Server'(N:) +[] Hold +[] Incoming_Data -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs +[]1100 +[]1200 +[]1300 -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs -[-]Jobs .and so on The system is running Red Hat 7.3 and Samba version 2.2.27-3.7.3, with Samba configured as a Primary Domain Controller. This could also be an ext3fs related issue and thus I will be posting this to the ext3fs mailing list as well. Although, this issue has ONLY appeared on Samba shared directory structures. Once "fixed" this issue will not show up for a few weeks or more. Thanks for any assistance offered. Regards, Robert Adkins IT Manager/Buyer Impel Industries, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba auth problems in RH9 w/ log
I have samba version 2.2.7a security-rollup fix from redhat running as a simple file server for about a dozen computers. the computers are all win2k except for 1 win98 and 1 winxp pro. I am having problems with nmbd dying and not restarting as some others in the list have has but I am also having a problem w/ 1 particular PC/username this person often is the only one that can't get into files on the computer (through mapped network drives) smbstatus tells me their machine is connected but the username is nobody. here is a recent log: --begin log--- [2003/06/14 20:45:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:46:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:47:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:48:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:49:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:50:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:51:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:52:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:53:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:54:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:55:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:56:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:57:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:58:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 20:59:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:00:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:01:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:02:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:03:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:04:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:05:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:06:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:07:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:08:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:09:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:10:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:11:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:12:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:13:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:14:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(878) Transaction 55918 of length 133 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1) [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(858) Domain=[] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0] [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(868) sesssetupX:name=[] [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(297) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172) get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99 [2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(336) uid 99 regis
[Samba] Primary Domain Controller problems
Platform: RedHat 7.0 Samba version: 2.2.7a Client platforms Windows 2000 Pro SP3 Number of clients: 7 This is my SAMBA configuration file # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) # Creation Date: 2002/10/21 15:26:01 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SABER netbios name = SHADOW server string = SAMBA-PDC interfaces = eth0 192.168.1.13 encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u logon script = netlogon.bat logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U logon drive = H: logon home = \\%L\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 64 preferred master = True domain master = True dns proxy = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon write list = ntadmin [profiles] path = /home/samba/profiles read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [QB-bkup] path = /fileshare read only = No I am also have an old NT 4 SP6 server running on the same network. I have experienced the problems described below with both the server connected and with it completely shut down. SYMPTOMS: The clients roaming profiles are not updated correctly during the logon/logoff process. For instance, after logging onto the domain through a client machine the following behavior appears: 1) Place a folder on the Desktop. 2) Drag documents/pictures etc. into new folder 3) Log off 4) Log in again 5) Delete the new folder along with its content(put in trash AND empty trash) 6) Log off 7) Log in again 8) The folder which was just deleted is still on the Desktop. (Usually the folder has been completely emptied of all files ... BUT NOT Subfolders [if there were any]). When I look at the profiles folder on the SAMBA PDC [/home/samba/profiles//Desktop] I notice that the folder which should have been deleted is still there This PDC has been running since 10/02 and this problem has only surfaced within the last 2 months. The following is an excerpt from one of the samba logs for a machine account. [2003/06/17 08:54:30, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(248) main-floor (192.168.1.100) couldn't find service stephany_berry [2003/06/17 08:54:30, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(248) main-floor (192.168.1.100) couldn't find service stephany_berry [2003/06/17 09:34:39, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 09:34:39, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 09:38:02, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 09:38:02, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 09:42:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 09:42:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 10:02:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 10:02:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 10:05:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 10:05:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 10:08:39, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 10:08:39, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2003/06/17 10:16:08, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(206) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2003/06/17 10:16:08, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1200) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] problem clearing the "Read Only" attribute from Windows XP
I am trying to configure a share using Samba version 2.2.7a, and have not been able to clear the "Read Only" attribute of created folders from within XP. In smb.conf, I have: read only = no, and am mapping the archive, system and hidden attributes to the Linux x bits. I have set the permissions for all users to allow changing attributes and permissions, yet the bit always returns set. I would appreciate any help. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] concerning saving roaming profile and the long delay
Νικος Σαραντοπουλος schrieb: everytime i am going to close my session (logout/shutdown) it take too long to save the roaming profile, why can somebody explain me? I had the same problem. In my case it was a program (tightVNC 1.2.8, known bug) that kept Windows from closing the registry during logout. Have a look at the Windwos Event Logs, there should be an error message you can feed to google. cu, Uwe -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] More Domain Groups
Hi All: Stuff I'm using: Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 2.1 Samba 2.2.7 OpenLDAP 2.0.25 I followed the Idealx.org howto to build Samba+LDAP. I have a functioning, replicating domain on my lab workbench right now. Then I began to explore permissions on local shares, etc. when I discovered that to a Windows client, the only domain groups that are available from a Samba PDC are "Domain Users" and "Domain Admins". Upon further reading in the Idealx Howto, I see this comment: "In Samba 2.2, only 2 groups are dealed for Microsoft Windows workstations: Domain Admins and Domain Users. All other groups are considered Local Unix Groups. That means that a Samba user will only be a Domain User or Domain Admin. If you only use Samba servers, there is no problem, but if you plan to use Microsoft Windows NT member servers using groups, just forget about it..." What this doesn't say is that the local Windows workstations will not be able to see anything but users those two groups. I have several machines sharing data and printers from the local machine. This simply isn't enough groups for me to apply my scheme of local rights. Well, more correctly, this causes me a great deal of administrative overhead maintaining local group definitions as things change. I've googled, read more howtos than I care to mention and have basically fried my brain looking for viable options to solve this problem. So I'm posing the question to the group: Is there anyway I can get additional groups (which are available to Samba) through to the local Windows workstations? -- Kevin L. Collins, MCSE Systems Manager Nesbitt Engineering, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] IP address for workstation
How get IP address the remote workstation in logon process (logon process in Samba Server)? -- Rafael, Claudio == Tribunal de Justiça - MG/Brazil Sefor - Secretaria de Informática Sites de projetos mantidos: - Pessoal: http://www.geocities.com/rafael_mcp - Monesa GNU Linux: http://www.monesa-br.cjb.net - Oportunidades(INFO): http://www.oportunidadesinformatica.hpg.com.br -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems Accessing Printer
I am running Samba 2.2.7a on a Mandrake 9.1 system. I am trying to make a locally attached printer, LaserJet 6mp, available to the network. The SWAT program is being used to do the configuration. I have configured the printer to be browseable and have made the nobody account the one that is used to access the printer. The /tmp directory is where the data will spool. The printing daemon that I am using is CUPS. After the configurations were complete, Samba was restarted. I tried to connect to the printer from a Windows 2000 workstation. I used the My Network Places icon to locate the system the printed was attached to, and selected the printer. I encountered an error message saying the wrong printer driver was loaded on the Samba server. I selected the "correct" driver from the Windows list. After that, the printer loaded, but had the following error message: Access denied, unable to connect. Any ideas? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: --with-quotas ??
>> >ok, so how are they used ? >> >> man quota >> >> read and man everything else under SEE ALSO >> >> It's really simple. >i take it quota's are not possible on shares if the >share is not on a partition ? A share is alway in a partition! But if you set up multiple shares in the same partition/logical volume, one set of quota rules will be binding for all of them. Quotas are not from samba. They are further below that level. They are provided by the fs. >quota's are only available for partitions correct ? Once again, quotas do not come from samba. Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba30b1 - net join responds failure - but machineaccount was created
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 22:37, boris blaha wrote: > hi, > > after compiling samba30b1 on suse82 > i try to join the domain: > > different commands, different responses > but always the machine account was sucessfully created > what doeas this mean ? > > a) net join -I 192.168.1.20 -U Administrator You need to join by name, not by IP - because other parts of the protocol demand to be called the 'right thing' Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] problems compiling 3.0beta
Greetings! I'm trying to build Samba3.0beta. I'm running HP-UX 11.11 I'm using GCC 3.2.3 I ran the configure script. Then I ran Make. It crap's out pretty much immediately.If anyone could look at the output below, and offer a suggestion, it would be greatly appreciated.I'm sure its something bone-headed that I'm doing wrong. Thanks! Ron # make Using FLAGS = -O2 -I./popt -Iinclude - I/home/ronb/samba/source/include -I/home/ronb/samba/source/ubiqx - I/home/ronb/samba/source/smbwrapper -I. -D_HPUX_SOURCE - D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE - D_ALIGNMENT_REQUIRED=1 -D_MAX_ALIGNMENT=4 - DMAX_POSITIVE_LOCK_OFFSET=0x1ffLL - I/home/ronb/samba/source LIBS = -lgen -lsec -lnsl -liconv LDSHFLAGS = -shared -g -O2 LDFLAGS = Compiling dynconfig.c In file included from include/includes.h:118, from dynconfig.c:21: /usr/include/sys/socket.h:484: syntax error before "sendfile" /usr/include/sys/socket.h:485: syntax error before "bsize_t" /usr/include/sys/socket.h:486: syntax error before "sendpath" /usr/include/sys/socket.h:487: syntax error before "bsize_t" /usr/include/sys/socket.h:493: syntax error before "sendfile64" /usr/include/sys/socket.h:494: syntax error before "bsize64_t" /usr/include/sys/socket.h:495: syntax error before "sendpath64" /usr/include/sys/socket.h:496: syntax error before "bsize64_t" In file included from /usr/include/sys/mp.h:55, from /usr/include/sys/malloc.h:59, from /usr/include/net/netmp.h:53, from /usr/include/net/if.h:59, from include/includes.h:284, from dynconfig.c:21: /usr/include/machine/sys/setjmp.h:45: redefinition of `struct label_t' In file included from dynconfig.c:21: include/includes.h:488: conflicting types for `socklen_t' /usr/include/sys/socket.h:199: previous declaration of `socklen_t' *** Error exit code 1 Stop. --- Ron Bombard, Network Administrator Meddle not in the affairs of dragons... for you are crunchy, and taste like chicken. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] concerning saving roaming profile and the long delay
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 09:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > adding this to your smb.conf may help: > > > # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details > socket options = TCP_NODELAY uh i think not... the long delay he's referring to is the delay that is required to save the roaming profile. there are only two options 1) reduce the size of the roaming profile 2) increase the speed of the network/server to reduce the size of the profile you could try a few tricks 1) move the netscape cache into the local settings folder (which is not replicated to the server) 2) store all documents permanently on the server instead of my documents 3) clean off the desktop best wishes brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Winbind+Pam
Almost there... Have Samba3 beta, RH9. Win2k Native Mode network.. I've done all the winbind stuff and PAM. I can't login as a domain user to my Linux box. I DO however have a linux account with the same credentials as my domain account. When I double click on the server from network neighborhood, it goes right in. It seems to me that the linux box still isn't accepting domain accounts. All the "wbinfo" stuff queries the domain controller fine, I get groups, users and everything. Please help! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Redhat 9.0 and samba-2.2.8a src rpm
Hi, I am currently using samba-2.2.8a on RedHat 7.3. This was installed from a .src.rpm with the following options added to the samba.spec file: ... --with-acl-support \ --with-profile \ --disable-static \ --with-ldapsam \ I am now trying to build samba-2.2.8a on RedHat 9.0. This goes ok from a standard samba.spec file but when I add the above options [specifically --with-ldapsam] I get the error below. + cp -pr examples /var/tmp/samba/usr/share/doc/samba-2.2.8a + exit 0 Provides: audit.so block.so config(samba) = 2.2.8a-2 libnss_winbind.so libnss_wins.so libsmbclient.so.0 pam_smbpass.so pam_winbind.so perl(smbldap_conf) = 1.00 perl(smbldap_tools) = 1.00 recycle.so samba = 2.2.8a Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Requires(post): /bin/sh Requires(preun): /bin/sh Requires(postun): /bin/sh Requires: /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl config(samba) = 2.2.8a-2 glibc >= 2.1.2 kernel >= 2.2.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libcrypto.so.4 libcups.so.2 libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) liblber.so.2 libldap.so.2 libncurses.so.5 libnsl.so.1 libnsl.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) libpam.so.0 libpopt.so.0 libreadline.so.4 libssl.so.4 pam >= 0.72 perl(Exporter) perl(smbldap_conf) perl(strict) perl(vars) Obsoletes: samba-common samba-client samba-swat Processing files: samba-debuginfo-2.2.8a-2 Provides: audit.so.debug block.so.debug libnss_winbind.so.debug libnss_wins.so.debug libsmbclient.so.debug pam_smbpass.so.debug pam_winbind.so.debug recycle.so.debug Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/samba error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/pdbedit RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/pdbedit Has anyone got a .src.rpm file installed on RedHat 9.0 or any ideas or pointers on doing this from a .src.rpm file? Thanks, Jason Doran -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] concerning saving roaming profile and the long delay
adding this to your smb.conf may help: # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY >-- Original-Message -- >From: "? ?" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 16:02:33 +0300 >Subject: [Samba] concerning saving roaming profile and the long delay > > >long time now i am using samba as primary pdc and i am enough satisfied, >but >i am facing the following problem > >everytime i am going to close my session (logout/shutdown) it take too long >to save the roaming profile, why can somebody explain me? > >Nikos Sarantopoulos > > >-- >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] concerning saving roaming profile and the long delay
long time now i am using samba as primary pdc and i am enough satisfied, but i am facing the following problem everytime i am going to close my session (logout/shutdown) it take too long to save the roaming profile, why can somebody explain me? Nikos Sarantopoulos -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: --with-quotas ??
>ok, so how are they used ? man quota read and man everything else under SEE ALSO It's really simple. Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail! http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem
Dears, I hope that this address is OK. I have one small problem. I'm using Linux rh 8.0 and samba of course. File server works OK only problem is Logon script on win 98. It takes only one minute to close it. The "dos window" is closed immediately but then takes almost a minute (closing Login script ..) Do you have any ideas? Thanks for your answer and best regards from Slovenia. Simon -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] number of login sessions
Hi exactly no but you can create script to this and use it on smb.conf as write help: preexec (S) This option specifies a command to be run whenever the service is connected to. It takes the usual substitutions. An interesting example is to send the users a welcome message every time they log in. Maybe a message of the day? Here is an example: preexec = csh -c 'echo \"Welcome to %S!\" | /usr/local/samba/bin/smbclient -M %m -I %I' & Of course, this could get annoying after a while :-) See also preexec close and postexec . Default: none (no command executed) Example: preexec = echo \"%u connected to %S from %m (%I)\" >> /tmp/log preexec close (S) This boolean option controls whether a non-zero return code from preexec should close the service being connected to. Default: preexec close = no Try use grep %u smbstatus combination to do this. Bye. - Original Message - From: "José M. Fandiño" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:05 PM Subject: [Samba] number of login sessions > Hello, > > I'd like to know if with the current version of samba it is > possible to limit the number of simultaneous login sessions? > > I have a lot of users which share their passwords despite > being warned against it, so I was told to stop them. > Until now I haven't been able to find any form to do this, > Does anyone have any idea about how to do it? > > regards. > -- > -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- > Version: 3.1 > GCS/IT d- s+:+() a- C+++ UBL+++$ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N+ o++ K- w--- > O+ M+ V- PS+ PE+ Y++ PGP+>+++ t+ 5 X+$ R- tv-- b+++ DI D++>+++ > G++ e- h+(++) !r !z > --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba30b1 - net join responds failure - but machine accountwas created
hi, after compiling samba30b1 on suse82 i try to join the domain: different commands, different responses but always the machine account was sucessfully created what doeas this mean ? a) net join -I 192.168.1.20 -U Administrator [2003/06/17 15:14:50, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(249) cli_nt_setup_creds: request challenge failed [2003/06/17 15:14:50, 1] utils/net_rpc.c:run_rpc_command(154) rpc command function failed! (NT_STATUS_INVALID_COMPUTER_NAME) Password: [2003/06/17 15:14:54, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(249) cli_nt_setup_creds: request challenge failed [2003/06/17 15:14:54, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_newstyle(321) error in domain join verification: NT_STATUS_INVALID_COMPUTER_NAME Unable to join domain TESTFIRMA. b) net join -S -U Administrator [2003/06/17 15:20:46, 1] utils/net_rpc.c:run_rpc_command(154) rpc command function failed! (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) Password: Joined domain TESTFIRMA. c) net join -U Administrator [2003/06/17 15:23:31, 1] utils/net_rpc.c:run_rpc_command(154) rpc command function failed! (NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT) Password: Joined domain TESTFIRMA. thx a lot in advance bb boris blaha -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba3.0 domain GID/UID/SID transformations
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 15:59, Nick Stephens wrote: > NS> Andrew Bartlett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) AB wrote on Jun 17, 2003: > > > There are a few solutions to your problem - one that many sites will be > > coming across as they attempt migrations. > > > > Firstly, if you just want to deal with the passwords, and don't mind > > keeping the users database as it was, you just use pam_winbind, but not > > nss_winbind. If you then set 'winbind use default domain = yes', and > > the NT usernames are the same as your unix ones, then it should all > > 'just work'. ie, only the passwords are redirected. > > In this case, do you mean to remove the winbind references from my > nsswitch.conf? Is this the portion of it that deploys the gid/uid/sid > information? Yes. PAM and nsswitch are seperate, and it can be quite handy to seperate them. Note that it doesn't work as well running winbind, not having winbind in nsswtich, but running the Samba file-server. > > If you want to go future, and ditch the unix username database, you can > > alter the 'idmap' that Samba controls (mapping the NT sids to uids) so > > that they match the existing unix accounts to the NT accounts. I think > > 'net idmap' should let you do this, but it's only just in CVS, and I've > > not played with it. > > so in this instance, would you mean removing any /etc/passwd & shadow > entries for the users, and letting it all be done via the smb.conf and > winbindd? That actually sounds like a good idea (it saves me from having > to be redundant with my userbase still), but my concern is this: i am > running samba on my linux mailserver that my users pop3 to.. i wanted to > synch my nt domain/unix passwds, as users will really appreciate the > ability to just have to change the one passwd, etc.. if i remove the > accounts from the passwd/shadow files, would i just have to rely on > properly created aliases to deliver the mail, since i don't think sendmail > will be aware of the nt domain users... If you have the winbind entry in the nsswtich.conf, and you have 'winbind use default domain = yes' and you have the same name on NT as on unix, then sendmail won't know the difference. You will need to set the idmap correctly if you don't want to chown the files. > along those same lines but kind of off 'samba' base (read: feel free to > ignore this if you have no idea what im talkin about :)... I am trying to > configure the pop3 pam.d conf to be able to accept those nt usernames, and > i'm curious if anyone has an example config for this very idea.. if so, > that would definitely save me some headaches im sure, and if not maybe i > can write one up for samba.org when i'm done ;) > > here is my (surely weak) attempt at /etc/pam.d/pop3: Looks good. > auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > auth required /lib/security/pam_shells.so > accountsufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > accountrequired /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so > sessionrequired /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth > > > -- > Nick Stephens > Systems Administrator > Ceiva Logic, Inc. > > (818) 481-6332 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] number of login sessions
Hello, I'd like to know if with the current version of samba it is possible to limit the number of simultaneous login sessions? I have a lot of users which share their passwords despite being warned against it, so I was told to stop them. Until now I haven't been able to find any form to do this, Does anyone have any idea about how to do it? regards. -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GCS/IT d- s+:+() a- C+++ UBL+++$ P+ L+++ E--- W++ N+ o++ K- w--- O+ M+ V- PS+ PE+ Y++ PGP+>+++ t+ 5 X+$ R- tv-- b+++ DI D++>+++ G++ e- h+(++) !r !z --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Suse SLES8 Samba 3.0 Beta1 Winbind
Hi, i've some problems with winbind in Samba 3.0 Beta1. The configuration: Samba 3.0 Beta1 installed under Sles8 on IBM z800 (s390) compiled with gcc 3.2 and installed pam-devel-0.76-32 configure options: ./configure --with-pam --with-winbind --with-acl-support --with-tdbsam --with-libsmbclient --with-smbwrapper --with-utmp --with-quotas NT PDC with SP6a NT workstation with SP6a i try some tests: Test Result wbinfo -t secret is ok wbinfo -g shows all unix and domain groups wbinfo -u shows all unix and domain users getent group shows only unix groups getent passwd shows only unix groups net rpc user ask for password and then fails (with password from normal domain user nad domain admin) net rpc group ask for password and then fails (with password from normal domain user nad domain admin) net rpc testjoin Join to "domain" is ok I try to show the shares of the samba server from the NT Workstation, the system ask for a user and password and fails with "wrong username or password" The winbind log file shows the following: [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] nsswitch/winbindd_pam.c:winbindd_pam_auth_crap(347) NTLM CRAP authentication for user [rhpr]\[165784] returned NT_STATUS_OK (PAM: 0) [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:client_write(469) client_write: wrote 1300 bytes. [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:client_write(514) client_write: need to write 1024 extra data bytes. [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:client_write(469) client_write: wrote 1024 bytes. [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:client_write(503) client_write: client_write: complete response written. [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 10] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(422) client_read: read 0 bytes. Need 1312 more for a full request. [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] nsswitch/winbindd.c:winbind_client_read(429) read failed on sock 21, pid 7034: EOF The machine log file shows th following: [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32s(861) 024c sub_auths : 0015 03f74b13 6eb31787 5d312c77 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam(288) Finding user RHPR\165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(223) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is rhpr\165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(230) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as given is RHPR\165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(247) Checking combinations of 0 uppercase letters in rhpr\165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(251) Get_Pwnam_internals didn't find user [RHPR\165784]! [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam(288) Finding user 165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(223) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is 165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(247) Checking combinations of 0 uppercase letters in 165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(251) Get_Pwnam_internals didn't find user [165784]! [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam(288) Finding user 165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(223) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is 165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(247) Checking combinations of 0 uppercase letters in 165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(251) Get_Pwnam_internals didn't find user [165784]! [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam(288) Finding user RHPR\165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(223) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is rhpr\165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(230) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as given is RHPR\165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(247) Checking combinations of 0 uppercase letters in rhpr\165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(251) Get_Pwnam_internals didn't find user [RHPR\165784]! [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam(288) Finding user 165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(223) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is 165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(247) Checking combinations of 0 uppercase letters in 165784 [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam_internals(251) Get_Pwnam_internals didn't find user [165784]! [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 0] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_info3(949) make_server_info_info3: pdb_init_sam failed! [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 5] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(256) check_ntlm_password: winbind authentication for user [165784] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER [2003/06/16 13:02:59, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(295) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [165784] -> [165784] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER [2003/06/16 13:02:59
[Samba] Samba Access Problem From Window NT/2000
Hello, I have configured the samba server on linux Redhat 6.2 as a file server. I shared two folder on it with different username and password. share name = General path = /home/general valid user = asad public = no writable =yes printable =no create mash =0755 share name = personal path = /home/john valid user = john public = no writable =yes printable =no create mash =0755 when i access "general" share with valid username/password from the windows-NT /2000 , i can able to open it, at the same time when i try to access the other share "personal" with valid username/password it show me the error , error description: "the credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials". but on the same time if i try to access the same share with the same username/password from different machine , i can able to open the share "persoanl". it seems that windows cache the first username/password and retained it unless you restart the machine or change the machine can anybody tell me what is the actual problem and how can we resolved it. waiting for reply, From, Asad Hafeez [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] LAN Browsing shows IP Addresses instead of Computer Names.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 23:35:42 -0700 > From: "Mega Spaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Samba] LAN Browsing shows IP Addresses instead of Computer > Names. > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > > I'm trying to figure out how I can have my lan browser display computer > names instead of IP Addresses. I think the ip addresses are generated by my > router since if I add a new computer, the ip addresses will be different for > each computer. anyway let me give you the specs first. Running Samba > 2.2.8a-1 on Red Hat 7.3. I have not set up WINS or DNS at all. That's your problem, reverse lookups need to work, either via DNS or nss_wins (apparently it works without a WINS server, in which case it used broadcasts). I don't know is RH ships with a working nss_wins, if they do, it should work by adding "wins" to the hosts line of your /etc/nsswitch.conf file. BTW, setting up working reverse DNS would be a better solution, for services that don't use get*ent, but direct DNS lookups. > I have set > up lisarc to use nmblookup. I'm assuming that my network is using > broadcasting to get computers in my LAN since i have not set up any computer > names in hosts or lmhosts. The current set up works right now in that > computers come up and can be browsed independant of the ip addresses > assigned to the computers. ie. if computer Tron is up on the network, and > then I boot up Sark, Sark will show up at the first next broadcast. but the > computers show up in konqueror as ip addresses, not as Tron and Sark. My > very old first setup attempt had me manually adding ip addresses and names > manually in the /etc/hosts file. but that would mess up the lan browsing if > another new computer was added to the network. So if Sark is 192.168.0.2 > and Tron is 192.168.0.3 and let's say my brother brings his laptop and i put > his laptop on the network, the ip addresses on the network will change to > something like Sark = 192.168.0.3, Tron = 192.168.0.2 and my brother's > laptop maybe something like Bros_comp = 192.168.0.4. but the /etc/hosts > file will have the old assignments which really messes up the browsing part. > Anyway right now i think i have it set up almost right since i can browse > the network and the computers on the network will be found no matter the > time they are actually booted up, but ip addresses in the lan browsing isn't > very useful and I would like to see the computer names displayed in the lan > browsing in konqueror. thank you for your patience, time, and any help you > can provide. - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+7vYlrJK6UGDSBKcRAtEQAJ9WoGfA34SrYpFl/IwkVOXUPpbyAQCeLrtG ASziSnkS4UvBQE6GxW9YB1E= =TamT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ** Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy. ** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] findsmb deprecated?
where did findsmb go? was it deprecated? is there something better replacing it? seems it was missing in rh7.2 (samba-2.2.7-3.7.2) and rh7.3 (samba-2.2.7-3.7.3) but the doc was still there, but entirely gone in rh9 (samba-2.2.7a-8.9.0). -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Implementing NIS based ACLs
Sorry ...my bad. I wasn't waiting long enough. It works fine. Thanks and Regards, - -Vaidy -- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] mount other users with 0755 perms
In response to my original Q (see below) i'm sending my entire smb.conf in the hope that someone can tell me why user's homedirs in an nfs/nis environment arent protected: [global] ; Basic server settings netbios name = hop workgroup = guard # security addition from SANS http://www.sans.org/top20/#W6 lanman auth = no min protocol = NT1 lm announce = no # Files with permissions set to prevent access shouldn't even appear hide unreadable = yes # Prevent browsing by default browseable = no domain admin group = gentot ; we should act as the domain and local master browser os level = 64 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0 hosts allow = 1.2.3.4 # tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine that connects log file = /scratch/local/app/samba/current/var/log.%m # default is only to log critical messages log level = 1 # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). max log size = 90 # this option gives better performance # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY ; security settings (must be security = user) security = user ; encrypted passwords are a requirement for a PDC encrypt passwords = yes ; support domain logons domain logons = yes ; where to store user profiles? logon path = \\hop\profiles\%u ; where is a user's home directory and where should it ; be mounted at? logon drive = Y: ; specify a generic logon script for all users ; this is a relative **DOS** path to the [netlogon] share logon script = logon.bat ; necessary share for domain controller [netlogon] path = /scratch/local/app/samba/current/lib/netlogon read only = yes write list = gentot ; share for storing user profiles [profiles] path = /export/smb/profiles/%u read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 load printers = yes printing = cups printcap name = cups printer admin = gentot [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no public = yes guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes printer admin = gentot [print$] comment = Printer Config path = /export/smb/cups browseable = yes guest ok = no read only = yes write list = gentot [homes] guest ok= no read only = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 preserve case = yes locking = no oplocks = no >-- Original-Message -- >Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:45:27 -0400 >From: Mark Verhyden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Samba] mount other users with 0755 perms > > >Please post your entire smb.conf file in order for people to see the >whole picture. > >Mark > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hallo >> I recently setup samba v 2.2.8a and have the following options for [homes] >> set in my smb.conf: >> >> [homes] >> guest ok= no >> read only = no >> create mask = 0700 >> directory mask = 0700 >> preserve case = yes >> locking = no >> oplocks = no >> >> Im on a NIS/NFS net. The problem is I can mount anyone elses directory >with >> no password if they have 0755 homedir perms. No username/password login >appears, >> the directory is mounted and I have access to all files. Other directories >> which do not allow world access produce an error saying they're not accessible, >> which isnt good, I would prefer a username + pwd window to appear. >> >> what options do I need in order to protect 0755 dirs and for all directories >> to be accessible through username + pwd ? >> >> thanks for the help >> AlanCB >> > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] which one is better samba or
At 23:50 16/06/2003 +0200, Arnold wrote: hi, do somebody tell me, where i could find information about samba restrictions compared with Windows Server. I' m trying to prepare a paper for school, which describe a comarison between samba and Windows Server. I heard for example, that 1-Samba is not adapted for great nets? Just as NT4 is. By the way, i have just had *quite a bit* of trouble with W2000 in a not-so-big network, where Active Directory got completely corrupted because of a malfunction in the domain master. Since formats and protocols in the Windoze world are mostly propietary and you only have the tools M$ thought you might need to deal with that situation, we have _no way_ to solve the problem, other to rebuild the *entire* directory: user accounts, groups, machine trust accounts, forest structure ... With Samba, however, we could have simply dumped the LDAP directory to disk, made some modifications if needed, clean the directory and reload data as if new... everything would have been fully functional back again. 2-Samba has not a "system management server" like windows? You need that for under Un*x ??? 3-Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) has been not yet implemented and this make dificulties to management of Samba in Nets?? They *are* implemented for domain joining/leaving, authentication, remote printing, printer driver upload/download, ... I' m appreciated for your help arn J.L -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cannot add Domain Groups to Local Groups (D Users OK)
I have searched the globe but alas I can't come up with a solution. I am running Debian 3.0r0 with samba 2.2.3a12-3 (or something around there) and Kernel 2.4.18. Basically I am trying to add a Domain Group to a Local Group, but when I do I get an error (From Windows 2000): "A member could not be added to or removed from the local group because the member does not exist" Can't figure out why I get this error, my friend running a similar set up had the same issue. I tried the new version of samba, samba 2.2.8a from www.samba.org (a binary tho), and it suffered the same flaw. I guess the only other critical information is that when I switched from 2.2.8a (and then back) I noticed that 2.2.8a had Domain Users listed when I viewed the domain groups available, but 2.2.3a (Debian build) didn't, occasionally it had a second group full of garbage characters, but that seemed to be intermitant on my 2000 machine (User Manager for Domains however showed it all the time, but with the characters changing). Secondly, when I list the members of the local group on all my machines, it lists some already predifined users, \S-1-5-21-...-1000 \S-1-5-21-...-512 Now everything up to the -1000, or -512 is the PDC's SID, I have no idea what they correspond to tho. I have a feeling that they happen to be my groups, OTher things was that when I add a machine to the domain I manually have to add the user to Local Administrators. These SID's are probably the ones that are automatically added locally upon joining the domain, and whatever resolves sids to name and backward is broken, or something. I have no idea what to do tho. (I just broke something else trying to fix this at the moment) Any ideas would help alot, thank you... Steve Jr Ramage -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] slow performance samba 2.2.7 with windows explorer on Win2000 or Win NT4
Hello, I notice that when I copy a small directory (150 kb) to a samba share drive on Windows 2000, the performance is very slow. This is also the case when using windows explorer on NT4. The samba share is made on a Sun solaris 2.8 system and samba 2.2.7 is used. Copying the same directoy with windows explorer (on the same pc !) to an samba share made on Sun Solaris 2.6 system, running samba 2.0.2 is much faster. There are no network traffic problems. The same test I did on a DOS prompt. The result of this test was the same for both Sun solaris systems. So I think there is a problem with Win2000 explorer and Samba 2.2.7. Do you have any idea what can be the reason? met vriendelijke groeten / regards , Kurt De Kesel _ Bayer BioScience N.V. Information Technology Nazarethse steenweg 77 B-9800 Astene (Deinze) Belgium Tel: +32 (0)9 381 84 54 Fax:+32 (0)9 380 16 62 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't access Samba Servers using cable internet access
Jeff, Problem is definitely with cable company. Can't telnet to any of the netbios ports, but on the server itself I can connect to port 139, the port that smbd and nmbd are on. Thanks for reminding me that telnet is a wonderful debugging tool also :^) Bobby - Original Message - From: Jeff Means To: Bobby Hitt Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:09 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Can't access Samba Servers using cable internet access Bobby Hitt wrote: >Hello, > >Ever since adding Internet access to my cable account, I can no longer >access several Samba servers on the Internet that I routinely accessed using >my dialup account. I've tried using both the inetd server (with my cable IP >address in the hosts.allow file. I can telnet, etc no problem, so I know >it's working) and running smbd and smbd as daemons. When I try to access the >Samba server, I watch the logs on the server, no warnings, errors, notices, >etc., no indiation that I'm even attempting to access the server. I've tried >using both the name in my /etc/hosts file, and also by IP address. As I said >before, I had no problems using my dialup account. > >Can anyone shed ANY light on what's going on? > >TIA, > >Bobby > > > yes, most cable companys block smb traffic across their networks see if you can telnet to the remote box on port 137, 138, and 139 to just recieve connect messages if you can then I hve no idea what is going on but it sounds like your cable company is blocking traffic. Jeff Means [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] --with-quotas ??
ok, so how are they used ? - Original Message - From: "Ryan Novosielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Samba Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:53 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] --with-quotas ?? > You don't do anything -- in fact, quotas are always enforced (with or > without with-quota) because the FS keeps track. The quota support, > however, provides windows clients with the quota info so it isn't a > surprise when a user has run out of quota and the machine gives the proper > status info. > > _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ > |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - Jr. UNIX Systems Admin > |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) > \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent. | IST/ACS - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, d.kavadas wrote: > > > ok, stupid question time > > how does one use quotas and samba, i haven't seen anything mentioned in any man page re quote support. > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] I am testing Samba 3beta1 as a PDC and have a Q about it'sbehaviure
I am using tdbsam as passdb backand. I have added root user with pdbedit. I have added the machine trust account with pdbedit. I have added the user with pdbedit. I have created the user in /etc/passwd. When the user logs in from a W2k and mounts the home-directory I noticed that Samba didn't take the home-directory information from tdbsam, it took it from /etc/passwd. Is that correct ? I assumed it would use the info in tdbsam. /Patrik -- "In a world without fences who needs Gates" Patrik Gustavsson, Senior Technical Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +46 60 671540 http://glen.swedenMobile: +46 70 3551040 SUN MICROSYSTEMS Fax: +46 60 671550 -- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Can't access Samba Servers using cable internet access
Bobby Hitt wrote: Hello, Ever since adding Internet access to my cable account, I can no longer access several Samba servers on the Internet that I routinely accessed using my dialup account. I've tried using both the inetd server (with my cable IP address in the hosts.allow file. I can telnet, etc no problem, so I know it's working) and running smbd and smbd as daemons. When I try to access the Samba server, I watch the logs on the server, no warnings, errors, notices, etc., no indiation that I'm even attempting to access the server. I've tried using both the name in my /etc/hosts file, and also by IP address. As I said before, I had no problems using my dialup account. Can anyone shed ANY light on what's going on? TIA, Bobby yes, most cable companys block smb traffic across their networks see if you can telnet to the remote box on port 137, 138, and 139 to just recieve connect messages if you can then I hve no idea what is going on but it sounds like your cable company is blocking traffic. Jeff Means [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
