date:20030701

[Samba] SLES7, Clearcase and Samba

2003-07-01 Thread Heinrich Venter

I am busy testing Clearcase on SLES7 on an IBM z900 mainframe.

 

I have set up samba v2.2.0 to be part of the corporate domain and have done
user mappings which works fine.  

 

Whenever I try to create a file in one of the shares with the correct
permissions, the systems stops responding in every way, http, ssh
everything.  I can still ping the machine however.

 

Any help will be appreciated.

 

Kind Regards

 

Heinrich Venter

TSD Innovation
South African Revenue Services
Tel: +27 12 452 5016
Fax: +27 12 452 5070
Cell: +27 82 652 7874
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.

 

 

 

The information transmitted is only to be viewed or used by the person/s or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material/information.  The South African Revenue Service (SARS)
reserves the copyright to all contents of SARS information contained in
e-mail messages.  The views and opinions expressed in this transmission are
those of the sender and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions
of SARS.  SARS cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained nor that it is free from errors, malicious code,
interception or interference.  Under no circumstances will SARS or the
sender of this e-mail be liable to any party for any direct, indirect,
special or other consequential damages from any use of this e-mail
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Cannot see home folder on MAC OS X

2003-07-01 Thread Eugene Joubert

Hi,
 
 I am running Samba 2.2.7a-58 on a SuSE 8.2 system. I have a few PC 
 connecting to the server and a few MACs. I am having a problem with 
 the MACs. Sometimes (most of the time) the MAC clients can access the 
 shares on the server, but can't access their home folders. They can't 
 even see the home folder. Going via netatalk it works fine. I have 
 gone through some documentation and can not find anything pertaining 
 to my problem. The PCs can acess their home folders just fine.
 
 Testparm runs with no errors. Just no home folders available for the 
 mac os x users. When I look in my samba logfiles, I can see that the 
 clients are connecting to samba using nobody as the username. Sure 
 this is not right?
 
 Any help would be appreciated.
 
 I am just about running a default config of samba. Nothing fancy like 
 PDC etc. No printers either.
 
 Thanks


Regards
Eugene Joubert
Network Administrator
CentraTel (PTY) LTD
Enabling Communications

*Office: +27 11 695 9000
*Direct: +27 11 695 9044
*Fax: +27 11 695 9015
*E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Web-site: www.centratel.co.za www.centratel.co.za
http://www.centratel.co.za http://www.centratel.co.za 

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us by e-mail. Any
views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and do
not necessarily coincide with those of Centratel (PTY) LTD.



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Many 64bit locks failed on HPUX 11.00/32

2003-07-01 Thread Gerhard Klein

Hi Samba Team,

I tried samba 2.2.8a (without winbind) on HPUX 11/32. I downloaded the
binaries from
http://de.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/hp/samba-2.2.8a/ I get
following errors:

[2003/06/27 10:16:50, 0] locking/posix.c:(658)
  an Invalid argument error. This can happen when using 64 bit lock
offsets
[2003/06/27 10:16:50, 0] locking/posix.c:(659)
  on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems.
[2003/06/27 10:16:50, 0] locking/posix.c:(673)
  Count greater than 31 bits - retrying with 31 bit truncated length.
[2003/06/27 10:16:50, 0] locking/posix.c:(656)

I'm not using NFS. From mailinglist I got following information:

 Original Message 
Betreff: Re: Samba: Many 64bit locks failed on HPUX 11.00
Datum: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 07:55:23 +0200
Von: R. Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Gerhard Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Referenzen: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sorry Gerhard,

I misread your first email. Ok it seems I have changed the configure 
script a little to get samba running well (I've attached the 
configure.diff file). The main problem seems to be that 
_LARGEFILE_SOURCE64 is being defined instead of _LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
causing 64bit code to be included. And of course this is failing on the 
32bit platform.

Good luck.

I'm not able to build own binaries. Can you help?


Gerhard

Gerhard Klein wrote:

Hi,

we are not uning NFS! The samba connections are very slow and after a while some
users get no connections. This problems are not with samba 2.0.7, but we need 2.2.x
for some new features.

Any idea?


Gerhard

R. Nieuwenhuizen schrieb:

  

Hi Gerard,

If you are exporting a NFS filesystem using samba then the messages are
correct. An NFS filesystem is always 32bit so when a 64bit lock is
requested an warning is logged. Nothing can be done!

Gerhard Klein wrote:



Hi,

I found your message about Samba errors:

Feb  8 11:30:02 pandora smbd[22922]:   posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock =

request at offset 0, length 9223372036854779000 returned
Feb  8 11:30:02 pandora smbd[22922]: [2002/02/08 11:30:02, 0] =
locking/posix.c:(662)
Feb  8 11:30:02 pandora smbd[22922]:   an Invalid argument error. This =

can happen when using 64 bit lock offsets
Feb  8 11:30:02 pandora smbd[22922]: [2002/02/08 11:30:02, 0] =
locking/posix.c:(663)
Feb  8 11:30:02 pandora smbd[22922]:   on 32 bit NFS mounted file =
systems.

I get the same errors on Samba 2.2.8a. We have also no NFS filesystems
mouted. We use HPUX 11.0/32. Could you solve the problem?

Thanks


Gerhard

-- 

René Nieuwenhuizen
Afdeling Informatietechnologie
Centraal Planbureau

Bezoekadres: Van Stolkweg 14, 2585 JR Den Haag
Postadres: Postbus 80510, 2508 GM Den Haag

T (070) 3383 342
F (070) 3383 350
I http://www.cpb.nl/nl/general/org/afdelingen/it/


--

Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.
Het bericht is alleen bestemd voor de geadresseerde.
Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd, verzoeken wij u dit
onmiddellijk aan
ons te melden en de inhoud van het bericht te vernietigen.

This message shall not constitute any obligations.
This message is intended solely for the addressee.
If you have received this message in error, please inform us immediately
and
delete its contents.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Samba as PDC across multiple physical sites

2003-07-01 Thread Uwe Laverenz

Sorisio, Chris schrieb:

Does anyone have Samba set up to provide file, print, and authentication
services across multiple physical sites?  We're thinking of setting up a
Yes, I have a comparable setup here. I use:

- Samba (one configured as PDC, all others as BDC)
- OpenLDAP (slapd on every server, replication via slurpd)
- cups
- Postfix + courier-imap
- rsync + ssh
The use of OpenLDAP (or LDAP in general) for user-authentification and 
keeping user- and group-information is the key for a distributed setup.

cu,
Uwe
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Cups or Samba?

2003-07-01 Thread David Morel

Le mar 01/07/2003 à 00:34, Kurt Pfeifle a écrit :

  I think cupsd takes a little time to populate the printers list  at
  startup, but i would tend to think smbd would reload the list on a
  regular basis, is it not so ?
  
 
 Oh yes -- that's the *theory*. As far as the *practical* side of
 things goes, unfortunately a bug in most recent versions of Samba
 prevents this from happening


ah! i knew it ! and they told me why do you keep HUPping processes, you
don't need to... ;-)
David
-- 
***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc
28192ef126bc871757cb7d97f4a44536




signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Local usr groups + pswd exp.

2003-07-01 Thread Collen

Well hello ya all.
first i would like to say, that we succesfully switched from a wind*s pdc 
to the samba 3 beta1 pdc.
it all looks to work fine.,
we use tdbsam as pasword back end..

the only worries i get is the fact that some how the local user groups 
(administrator, users, guest ect ect)
won't realy work.
i mapped them in the same way i did with the domain groups (and those work 
just fine)
but as soon as i use the windows user manager and select a local group, it 
gives an error in return.
(the same action with domain groups works fine)

second question i have is the password expire date, how can i set this up.
now every user has to change once in a while, and also the computer ($) 
account's have 1 30 day valite time
before expire..
(coz some workstations are win2k and other 98).

i viewed the user list with pbdedit and most of them were 30 days and a few 
were valite till 2038. ?!?
how do i change these dates ?
(didn't work from within the wind*s user manager)

well that's all what this happy samba user has to say...

Collen Blijenberg
MLHJ.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] I think this would be pretty cool

2003-07-01 Thread Karl Lattimer

Would it be possible to change or add another mounting method for samba,
instead of using 

 

smbclient -L host -U username

 

To change this to use the standard URI format of 

 

smbclient smb://username:password@host

 

and to mount

 

mount smb://username:password@host/shared folder

 

The current format is fine but if we could use a standard format for all
network access it would improve the consistency.

 

Thanks 

 

Karl

 

PS. It would also be nice to use the same format for nfs etc. how likely do
you think it is that the community at large would be willing to accept this
format, we already use this method for http ftp and similar? Any thoughts
are welcome.

 

 

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] ask about oplock kernel in detail

2003-07-01 Thread ardi


Note: forwarded message attached.


__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] kerberos works but the password is requested everytimenevertheless

2003-07-01 Thread stefan sokoll

hi
 
i'm running suse8.2 and have the MIT kerberos implementation as well as 
samba-3.0.0beta1 installed
 
kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and
net ads join
works fine
 
running 
smbclient //SERVER/stefans_share -k
asks me for password and don't uses kerberos authentication instantly
 
surprisingly i don't need to type a password in and can simply press enter and then 
kerberos authentication works - i tested some cases
 
but how can i avoid that the password is requestet at first? - can somebody give me 
some help
 
thanks
stefan



-
Gesendet von http://mail.yahoo.de
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

[Samba] Prevent Samba from setting the execute bit (with inheritACLs set to YES) ?

2003-07-01 Thread f . pospischil

Hi there 

Linux (redhat 9.0) does not set the execute-bits for new files, (even with
umask set to 777) by default.

Why does samba ?

When default ACLs are set, samba explicitly sets the mode to 777 for new
files and directories, and then somehow corrects them according to the
default ACLs.
As the default ACLs have to contain an executable bit to allow access to
newly created directories, every new file will have this bit set, too.

Is it possible to tell samba to treat new files and new directories in
different ways to reflect standard unix behavior ? ( i.e. set mode to 666
for files and 777 for dirs)

BTW, even setting the force security to 666 does not prevent the file from
beeing created with 777 ...

We use samba 2.2.8a on redhat 9.0 with XFS as a plattform for cross-system
development.

Help is very much appreciated ...

Frank Pospischil
Leiter IT
Telenet AG Rhein-Main
Darmstadt, Germany
Web: http://www.telenet-ag.de

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Re: [Samba] Prevent Samba from setting the execute bit (withinherit ACLs set to YES) ?

2003-07-01 Thread David Morel

Le mar 01/07/2003 à 12:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hi there

Linux (redhat 9.0) does not set the execute-bits for new files, (even with
umask set to 777) by default.

Why does samba ?

When default ACLs are set, samba explicitly sets the mode to 777 for new
files and directories, and then somehow corrects them according to the
default ACLs.
As the default ACLs have to contain an executable bit to allow access to
newly created directories, every new file will have this bit set, too.

Is it possible to tell samba to treat new files and new directories in
different ways to reflect standard unix behavior ? ( i.e. set mode to 666
for files and 777 for dirs)

in global section
directory mode = 0770
create mode = 0660

have you read the manual, or did i not understand your question properly
?

BTW, even setting the force security to 666 does not prevent the file from
beeing created with 777 ...

We use samba 2.2.8a on redhat 9.0 with XFS as a plattform for cross-system
development.

Help is very much appreciated ...

Frank Pospischil
Leiter IT
Telenet AG Rhein-Main
Darmstadt, Germany
Web: http://www.telenet-ag.de
--
***
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP public key: http://www.amakuru.net/dmorel.asc
28192ef126bc871757cb7d97f4a44536

signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

1 2 >

1 - 100 of 170 matches

Mail list logo