[Samba] Help!!!! Gettting samba core dumps
I transferred a Xen vm that was running on centos 5.7 with samba 3.6.3 to a centos 6.2 bare metal server with one E5502 and 16gig of memory. I have been running Centos for 6 years on different servers for 6 years on several different upgrades. This new server has a dual network card in it. I have samba 3.6.3 on it and here is the smb.conf below: [global] workgroup = workwhatever server string = interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = Yes username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log file = /var/log/samba/%m name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 load printers = No os level = 125 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes idmap config * : backend = tdb strict locking = No dos filetime resolution = Yes fake directory create times = Yes [home] path = /data/main/home/%u read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 [sbt] path = /data/main/sbt valid users = @sbt read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 [act] path = /data/act valid users = @act read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 [sharedir] path = /data/main/shareddir valid users = @shared read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 [everyuser] path = /data/home valid users = mainuser read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 [graphics] path = /data/main/graphics valid users = @graphics read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 [ghost] path = /data/ghost/%u read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 [ghostdata] path = /data/ghost valid users = mainuser read only = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 I am getting the below dumps in my messages log. I have cheked and rechecked my dns. This is the only win server on the network. Anyone has any ideas whatsoever. PLEASE!!! Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]: From: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]: [2012/02/16 00:42:25.751443, 0] lib/fault.c:51(fault_report) Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]: === Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]: [2012/02/16 00:42:25.751487, 0] lib/util.c:1117(smb_panic) Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]: PANIC (pid 3513): internal error Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]: [2012/02/16 00:42:25.756568, 0] lib/util.c:1221(log_stack_trace) Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]: BACKTRACE: 27 stack frames: Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#0 smbd(log_stack_trace+0x1c) [0x7f8a8f0f276c] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#1 smbd(smb_panic+0x55) [0x7f8a8f0f286e] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#2 smbd(+0x3e7867) [0x7f8a8f0e4867] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#3 /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x3668032900) [0x7f8a8c0b6900] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#4 smbd(copy_serverinfo+0x1a) [0x7f8a8f141685] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#5 smbd(make_server_info_guest+0x10) [0x7f8a8f141821] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#6 smbd(+0x443d89) [0x7f8a8f140d89] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#7 smbd(+0x43ed40) [0x7f8a8f13bd40] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#8 smbd(+0x44ac42) [0x7f8a8f147c42] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#9 smbd(ntlmssp_server_auth+0xb37) [0x7f8a8eed72e0] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#10 smbd(ntlmssp_update+0x220) [0x7f8a8eecd8ef] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#11 smbd(auth_ntlmssp_update+0x16) [0x7f8a8eecea87] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#12 smbd(+0x1377b2) [0x7f8a8ee347b2] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#13 smbd(reply_sesssetup_and_X+0x183) [0x7f8a8ee34afe] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#14 smbd(+0x16d6a3) [0x7f8a8ee6a6a3] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#15 smbd(+0x170c46) [0x7f8a8ee6dc46] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#16 smbd(+0x170f0c) [0x7f8a8ee6df0c] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#17 smbd(+0x170f4e) [0x7f8a8ee6df4e] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#18 smbd(run_events_poll+0x3e1) [0x7f8a8f100a5f] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#19 smbd(smbd_process+0xbbf) [0x7f8a8ee6d993] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#20 smbd(+0x651904) [0x7f8a8f34e904] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#21 smbd(run_events_poll+0x3e1) [0x7f8a8f100a5f] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#22 smbd(+0x403e7a) [0x7f8a8f100e7a] Feb 16 00:42:25 mainserver smbd[3513]:#23 smbd(_tevent_loop_once+0x82)
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Hi Denis, I was just wondering if any progress was made with regpatch? Yours hopefully :) Rich On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:08 +0200, denis.bonnenfant wrote: Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:01 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs in .reg parsing In fact it doesn't make sense to mount regf files to anything but HKCU , so -K option is not necessary, and HKCU can be hardcoded as mountpoint for files specified by -F option. I use this quite a bit and I'm aware of two bugs, which is not directly related to the parsing, but that on windows unicode is implicit for certain data types even when the data is given in binary format, it's still converted. The other 'bug' is that unicode .reg files are not yet supported. I'd be very interested to know what other bugs there are. I found some problems with value deletion, sometimes values are not deleted, reg_expand_sz data not correctly saved, but i'm not sure that the problem is in parsing. I'm going to experiment a little bit more. Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back?
If I'm having oplock problems (i.e. poor performance), then would turning off oplocks altogether bring the performance back up? Richard G. Lang Sr. Software Engineer la...@specsensors.commailto:la...@specsensors.com (330) 659-3312 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back?
Actually, I've performed a network trace, but I was looking for something different. I'm no expert in the SMB protocol, so I appreciate your comments. I'll look for these calls and see what I come up with. Rich -Original Message- From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:volker.lende...@sernet.de] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 4:46 PM To: Lang, Rich Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back? On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 04:32:42PM -0400, Lang, Rich wrote: Thanks to all who responded. This shouldn't be anything to do with oplocks, although I understand their nature and how they can destroy performance. The file I analyze is being accessed by no one but me - guaranteed. We're a small company and I know that to be true. Being the only one does not mean no oplocks are broken. Excel as a sample application is very prone to do that. To make 100% sure, you will need to look at the network trace and look for lockingx calls from server to client without a request. That's what I would look for next. But as you have already done that I can't help anymore. Sorry. Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-37-0, fax: +49-551-37-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back?
Well, it just gets curiouser and curiouser. I downloaded, built and installed the latest stable version of Samba (i.e. 3.5.9) on my inactive cluster member which is running RedHat ES 5.6. In case I didn't show this before, here's the output of `uname -a`: Linux mustang1 2.6.18-238.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Fri Mar 18 12:42:04 EDT 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux Anyway, I create a share and copied the troublesome file to that share and opened it using the VB application that showed such poor performance. It opened the file and processed it as quickly as if it were on my local hard drive. This is more like it. This is back to how the share used to respond. When I navigated back to the original copy of the file, the performance went to pieces again. Same file, different versions of Samba, different performance. Looks like I fixed it, although I don't know exactly what was wrong. So, I wanted to take a wireshark snapshot of the poor performance to see if the client was negotiating the buffer size down over the wire. In the meantime, the original file and its folder were moved from the Samba share to a M$ share on another server. Oh well - I copied the file back to the Samba share. Guess what? The performance is great - back to where it was before the problem started. So - it's not the version of Samba. It looks like this is an inode corruption on the disk, although I've run fsck a number of times on the disk and it always comes up clean. H...there might be some tools that I need to use to keep my shared disk clean. We're running the cluster through a pair of HP SmartArray 642 SCSI interfaces both connected to an MSA 500 G2 disk array with redundant controllers. There are four logical disks defined, each of which is defined as part of a cluster service so it can swing between cluster members in case of a failure. Does anyone use this kind of disk array in a shared configuration like this? Richard G. Lang Sr. Software Engineer la...@specsensors.commailto:la...@specsensors.com (330) 659-3312 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back?
Thanks to all who responded. This shouldn't be anything to do with oplocks, although I understand their nature and how they can destroy performance. The file I analyze is being accessed by no one but me - guaranteed. We're a small company and I know that to be true. I reverted the secondary cluster member from Samba 3.5.9 back to 3.0.33 and, voila' - the slow performance returned. No one else in the company even knows that this share exists, so this performance degradation isn't because someone else is breaking my oplock. I ran a wireshark analysis on the net during a fast file analysis (under Samba 3.5.9) and a slow analysis (under Samba 3.0.33). The SMB protocol shows that the client is the one that is ratcheting-down the file access to where single bytes are being retrieved from the server. Under Samba 3.5.9, the client is retrieving data using 4096-byte blocks. This may have happened due to a Microsoft update to the client at that point in time and 3.0.33 isn't responding correctly somehow. I haven't found the real reason - I just know that 3.5.9 appears to work when 3.0.33 doesn't. However, 3.0.33 *does* work on the active cluster member. Rich -Original Message- From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:j...@samba.org] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 12:09 PM To: Volker Lendecke Cc: Lang, Rich; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back? On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:31:14PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: Hi! I'd rather assume an oplock break. As long as you're alone on the file, it's fast. Once somebody else opens (or even just takes a look at) the file, it's slow. This can be confirmed with a network trace. Yes, this is what screamed out to me. It has to be oplock related IMHO. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back?
The clients may have undergone a change (Windows is always being patched), but the configuration of the server was not changed regarding oplocks. No requests are being denied, since that situation would show up in the log file. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:j...@samba.org] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 3:49 PM To: Lang, Rich Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back? On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:39:16AM -0400, Lang, Rich wrote: Hello, We are running Samba 3.0.33 on a 2-node Linux cluster running RedHat 5.6 ES. Its primary application is to serve out a single network drive to support our business (out 350GB in size). For several years, this solution has been running flawlessly. File access was almost as fast as a local disk, so putting files on the server was never a problem. Our clients are running mostly Windows XP Pro. We have a few Windows 7 clients. Almost a year ago, that changed. Applications written in VB 6.0 that read files from the server started showing *significant* performance problems. What used to take seconds now takes more than a minute to finish. Moving the file to a local disk brought the speed back up to where it should be. Moving the file to a Windows 2003 or 2008 server also provided good throughput. All clients experience this same problem. I ran strace -f against the smbd process that is assigned to my desktop and then ran the VB application to see what the daemon was up to. I discovered that it went through a process of opening the file several times and reading data from it, using progressively smaller buffer sizes until is settled on using a buffer size of 1, which it used for the remainder of the file I/O session. This *seems* like clients not using oplocks, when previously they were. Has anything changed in the server system that might be denying oplock requests ? Jeremy. Richard G. Lang Sr. Software Engineer la...@specsensors.commailto:la...@specsensors.com (330) 659-3312 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba process throttled back?
Lang, Rich wrote: Hello, We are running Samba 3.0.33 on a 2-node Linux cluster running RedHat 5.6 ES. Its primary application is to serve out a single network drive to support our business (out 350GB in size). For several years, this solution has been running flawlessly. File access was almost as fast as a local disk, so putting files on the server was never a problem. Our clients are running mostly Windows XP Pro. We have a few Windows 7 clients. Any difference in performance between the client types? None whatsoever. Did the problems coincide with adding win7 machines to the network? Nope. Windows 7 didn't appear on the network until 8 months later. Any new software on the clients (antivirus, firewall...etc?) Is something using up more memory on them? No - we can rule out the clients, since this happens on every client we have, no matter how it is configured. on your sockets, I up the SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF to at least 65536 each (more won't help until full smb2 support is in samba) I can make this change and see what happens. Did you get any new windows servers on your network around the time of the problem? I notice that you have your 'os level = 0', that means for things like name resolution, your smb server will have lowest priority -- even below a win98 client, as I understand it. No new servers were added. Our os level is low because the configuration file is for a BDC and only the PDC and BDC are part of this Samba-only domain - no Windows servers are a part of it. You mention you ran an 'strace -f' on smbd. Have you looked at a wireshark trace? That would tell you more -- like when negotiating a TCP session, if your windows client keeps reducing the RCV buffer size that would have told you why the reads were getting smaller. Maybe you are getting packet drops, or similar Good idea. I would expect to see indications of this activity over the wire. I'll let you know ... n Reminds me, do you have switches or hubs, what type of ethernet speed...I take it nothing in the hardward on the clients or the server has changed? We run on all switches - Linksys and Dell. We have 100MBPS to each desktop. You say you are using RH. Has the SW remained static since installation and through this problem increase (I.e. an auto-update of SW might have changed some setting in the kernel, or some firewall might have been added, modifiedetc...)... This is a real possibility, although we've booted the servers up using a kernel image prior to the problem appearing and the problem remained. Maybe I need to go back to a kernel module rev prior to the problem. Are the windows client's 'paging' more? I.e. was there any change in the VB script or the SW it's using such that now there could be a memory leak, thus increased paging? No - nothing like that is happening on the client. Have you set/optimized your TCP/IP params on XP? (and what little you can do on Win7... which is less configurable than XP) Have you added more clients (significant?)... These are pretty stock XP systems. The problem was so sudden (worked great for years, then slowed to a crawl) that it has to be associated with a change on the server or the client. On the Win clients...what SP are the XP clients running at? Many people complained when SP2 came out -- especially affected were network applications. SP3 has the best performance of the XP series (even better than the original), while SP1 was slower than 'SP0' (original), and SP2 was slower still... We're all running at Windows XP service pack 3. I don't have any specific theories...just asking for more data at this point, since there are so many possible variables...and just having the information out there would help anyone investigate the problem... Good luck! Linda Thanks. Richard G. Lang Sr. Software Engineer la...@specsensors.commailto:la...@specsensors.com (330) 659-3312 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba process throttled back?
Hello, We are running Samba 3.0.33 on a 2-node Linux cluster running RedHat 5.6 ES. Its primary application is to serve out a single network drive to support our business (out 350GB in size). For several years, this solution has been running flawlessly. File access was almost as fast as a local disk, so putting files on the server was never a problem. Our clients are running mostly Windows XP Pro. We have a few Windows 7 clients. Almost a year ago, that changed. Applications written in VB 6.0 that read files from the server started showing *significant* performance problems. What used to take seconds now takes more than a minute to finish. Moving the file to a local disk brought the speed back up to where it should be. Moving the file to a Windows 2003 or 2008 server also provided good throughput. All clients experience this same problem. I ran strace -f against the smbd process that is assigned to my desktop and then ran the VB application to see what the daemon was up to. I discovered that it went through a process of opening the file several times and reading data from it, using progressively smaller buffer sizes until is settled on using a buffer size of 1, which it used for the remainder of the file I/O session. I've attached the smb.conf file for your reading pleasure. I can attach the strace output file if that would be helpful. I suspect that something changed on the Windows desktop side to bring this about, since we made no changes to our VB code at all. Richard G. Lang Sr. Software Engineer la...@specsensors.commailto:la...@specsensors.com (330) 659-3312 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba process throttled back?
Sorry - I didn't realize the list wouldn't accept attachments. Here is the
smb.conf file:
#Backup Domain Controller
## Global parameters
[global]
unix charset = LOCALE
workgroup = IBMPEERS
netbios name = mustang1
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://mustang1.si.lan
ldap://mustang2.si.lan;
# passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://mustang1.si.lan;
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
# interfaces = 192.168.2.242/32
# bind interfaces only = yes
log level = 0
syslog = 1
log file = /var/log/samba/%m
max log size = 1024
name resolve order = wins bcast hosts
guest account = nobody
# printcap name = CUPS
# show add printer wizard = No
logon script = logon.bat
logon path =
logon drive = C:
domain logons = Yes
domain master = No
local master = no
preferred master = no
os level = 0
wins server = mustang2.si.lan
ldap suffix = dc=IBMPEERS,dc=lan
ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers,ou=Users
ldap user suffix = ou=People,ou=Users
ldap group suffix = ou=Groups
ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap
ldap admin dn = cn=sambaadmin,dc=IBMPEERS,dc=lan
utmp = no
idmap backend = ldap://mustang2.si.lan
idmap uid = 1-2
idmap gid = 1-2
# printing = cups
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/*.{*}/
veto oplock files = /*.doc/*.xls/*.mdb/*.pdf/
#Share Definitions=
[si]
comment = Shared disk service on SI Cluster
veto files = /.clumanager/.rgmanager/
browsable = yes
writable = yes
public = yes
path = /mnt/share/si
#
#- Force all files/dirs to be create group-writeable and world-readable.
#
create mask = 0664
force create mode = 0664
directory mask = 0775
force directory mode = 0775
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
browseable = No
#[test]
# comment = TEST
# browseable = yes
# writable = yes
# public = yes
# path = /tmp/data1
#
[netlogon]
comment = Network Logon Service
path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon
guest ok = Yes
locking = No
[profiles]
comment = Profile Share
path = /var/lib/samba/profiles
read only = No
profile acls = Yes
[cdrom]
oplocks = False
level2 oplocks = False
comment = CD-ROM/DVD
path = /mnt/cdrom
read only = Yes
guest ok = Yes
public = Yes
browsable = Yes
Richard G. Lang
Sr. Software Engineer
la...@specsensors.commailto:la...@specsensors.com
(330) 659-3312
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:08 +0200, denis.bonnenfant wrote: Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:01 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs in .reg parsing In fact it doesn't make sense to mount regf files to anything but HKCU , so -K option is not necessary, and HKCU can be hardcoded as mountpoint for files specified by -F option. Sorry if I am misunderstanding something here, but if the .reg file is modifying a software or system key shouldn't regpatch mount the appropriate hive, mounting under HKLM/Software system under HKLM/system etc. ? (I currently am using Ghost's linux ghregedit to do this, but I am hoping for a license free version, ... I have been searching for a very long time for something that actually works!) I was envisaging a usage along these lines; regpatch -F /mnt/xp/WINDOWS/ myregpatch.reg #regpatch loads the hives needed itself based on the WNIDOWS target dir (auto filling system32/config), this approximates to how ghrededit works ..or more in keeping with how its setup at the moment regpatch -F /mnt/something/software,/mnt/something/system myregpatch.reg #tell it what hives to load I appreciate all the effort everyone is putting in. Thanks. I use this quite a bit and I'm aware of two bugs, which is not directly related to the parsing, but that on windows unicode is implicit for certain data types even when the data is given in binary format, it's still converted. The other 'bug' is that unicode .reg files are not yet supported. I'd be very interested to know what other bugs there are. I found some problems with value deletion, sometimes values are not deleted, reg_expand_sz data not correctly saved, but i'm not sure that the problem is in parsing. I'm going to experiment a little bit more. Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Hi Michael, Many thanks for your reply - have tried your second patch on the git I just pulled, and got about as far as you, .reg file contains a bit for system and software hive, first entry in it relates to software hive against software hive rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ ./regpatch -d=10 -F /tmp/config/software /tmp/config/RunOnceEx.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 Attempting to load registry file 3444 HBIN blocks read Opening parent of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE failed with WERR_BADFILE Error adding new key 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows \CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx\940': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows \CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx\940 rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ against system hive rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ ./regpatch -d=10 -F /tmp/config/system /tmp/config/RunOnceEx.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 Attempting to load registry file 789 HBIN blocks read Opening parent of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE failed with WERR_BADFILE Error adding new key 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows \CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx\940': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows \CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx\940 rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ changing order of things in .reg file so system hive alteration is first bit rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ ./regpatch -d=10 -F /tmp/config/system /tmp/config/RunOnceEx2.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 Attempting to load registry file 789 HBIN blocks read Opening parent of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM failed with WERR_BADFILE Error adding new key 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services \Intelppm': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services \Intelppm rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ removed all system hive references, only entry relates to system hive rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ ./regpatch -d=10 -F /tmp/config/system /tmp/config/RunOnceEx3.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 Attempting to load registry file 789 HBIN blocks read Opening parent of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM failed with WERR_BADFILE Error adding new key 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services \Intelppm': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services \Intelppm not specifying a hive so it writes to local samba hklm.tdb (seems to work fine) rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ sudo ./regpatch -d=10 /tmp/config/RunOnceEx.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr: @LIST control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: no modules required by the db ldb: No modules specified for this database ldb: ldb_trace_request: REGISTER_CONTROL 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1413 control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: rootDSE scope: base expr: (objectClass=*) attr: rootDomainNamingContext attr: configurationNamingContext attr: schemaNamingContext attr: defaultNamingContext control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb_wrap open of /usr/local/samba/private/hklm.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Bonjour Denis, I would be very grateful if you manage to do it! Rich On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 17:41 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 10:26 +0200, denis bonnenfant a écrit : Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 00:28 +0200, Michael Wood a écrit : On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, Hi, Two years ago, I worked a bit on this. There was a lot of things to be done for full support of regf files patching . My patches mostly worked, but I never submitted it because I finally decided to generate .pol files with a small python script and appmently it on client side instead of patching regf files server-side. So I'm going to resurrect my old sources, rebase it on current git, and hope it helps... As far as I remember, there was some problems with regf format writing, and the registry files generated were sometimes corrupted. Investigating it may be quite difficult, as regf format is not simple and badly documented. But maybe some work was already done yet ? I had a look, and the merge is not straightforward. So I have work on it a little bit. Hopefully, regf code seems corrected, so I expect some good news... Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
: rootDomainNamingContext attr: configurationNamingContext attr: schemaNamingContext attr: defaultNamingContext control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb_wrap open of /var/lib/samba/private/hku.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES changetype: add key: CASE_INSENSITIVE value: CASE_INSENSITIVE control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-add ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-prepare_commit ldb: commit ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-end_transaction Key 'key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE Key 'key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE Key 'key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE Key 'key=CurrentVersion,key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=CurrentVersion,key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE Key 'key=Winlogon,key=CurrentVersion,key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE' not found key added: key=Winlogon,key=CurrentVersion,key=Windows NT,key=Microsoft,key=SOFTWARE,hive=NONE About to write LegalNoticeCaption with type (null), length 0: About to write LegalNoticeText with type (null), length 0: About to write allocatecdroms with type (null), length 1: 1 About to write AutoAdminLogon with type (null), length 1: 1 regdiff also seems to ignore any .reg files passed to it. conversely regtree and regshell both seem to work fine operating on a local hive though. (actually regtree borks reading the software hive but is ok on others) The man pages elude to it being able to do this so is it me being thick or is it not meant to work? http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/natty/en/man1/regpatch.1.html I am using 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 Regards Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Printing failure through PDC
Volker Lendecke wrote: On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 04:12:26PM -0400, Rich West wrote: I recently went through a system upgrade, which resulted in an upgrade of Samba to 3.0.28a. This is for a home network, so it isn't heavily taxed (only by family members), but I do use the environment as a sandbox of sorts for stuff that I plan to roll in to production in the office. Can you recompile Samba with -g and run it under valgrind? The logfile of the segfault would be very helpful. Hrmm.. I'll have to work on that, then. :( I'm running off of the standard RPM... -Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Printing failure through PDC
Rich West wrote: I recently went through a system upgrade, which resulted in an upgrade of Samba to 3.0.28a. This is for a home network, so it isn't heavily taxed (only by family members), but I do use the environment as a sandbox of sorts for stuff that I plan to roll in to production in the office. I had some funky issues with authentication to start with after the upgrade, so I went through the (somewhat) painful steps to set up ldapsam. I managed to get all of the users set up within LDAP, and all of the machine accounts configured within LDAP, and logging in and out of the domain with roaming profiles (using samba to create the machine accounts and user accounts turned out to be the right way to do it rather than to hand modify the LDAP accounts). The only remaining issue is with regard to printing: When a Windows user connects to the printer (hppsc2510) and sends a test page, they get an error stating that the job failed to print (unable to create print job). In the log.system name file, I can see: [..snip...] -- At this point, I'm truly unsure of what is failing. I've made sure that /var/spool/samba exists and is world writeable. I tried moving it out of the way and testing, and samba gave an appropriate error in the log file. I tried shutting down CUPS and doing the same test, and samba gave an appropriate error then, too. I can print via the command line on the samba server (a Fedora 8 box) as the same user who is logged in on the windows box... Any ideas? -Rich Actually, I made some headway.. I found that we had an old setting for disable spoolss = yes in place. Removing that allowed things to get a tiny bit forward. I'm not seeing much logged, but I am getting Test page failed to print ... Access is denied. from the windows side. The Windows box successfully gets the driver as supplied by the samba server, so I know that part is working. I'm just not sure what the Access is denied. is referring to... -Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Recovering Windows computer account string
It might be easier to remove the system from the domain and re-add it to the domain... -Rich We utilize the smbpasswd text file back end. One machine (VM machine) suddenly thinks its entry in the Samba PDC's smbpasswd file is no longer correct. Is there a way to fetch that number back out of a Windows 2000 workstation and paste it into the smbpasswd file to re-trust the workstation? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Printing failure through PDC
14:43:25, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(474) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(288) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(241) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(448) NT user token: (NULL) [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(474) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(288) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(1230) synapse (192.168.56.254) closed connection to service IPC$ [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(69) Yielding connection to IPC$ [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 4] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_ChDir(665) vfs_ChDir to / [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(241) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_nt_user_token(448) NT user token: (NULL) [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 5] auth/auth_util.c:debug_unix_user_token(474) UNIX token of user 0 Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(288) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(506) [2008/03/22 14:43:25, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(516) size=35 smb_com=0x71 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=51201 smb_tid=1 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=64832 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 -- At this point, I'm truly unsure of what is failing. I've made sure that /var/spool/samba exists and is world writeable. I tried moving it out of the way and testing, and samba gave an appropriate error in the log file. I tried shutting down CUPS and doing the same test, and samba gave an appropriate error then, too. I can print via the command line on the samba server (a Fedora 8 box) as the same user who is logged in on the windows box... Any ideas? -Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problems with Samba share access
Hello all, I'm having some trouble getting my Debian-based NAS running correctly with Samba permissions. For trouble-shooting purposes, I have three machines of interest: --MACHINE A: NAS (running Debian/2.6), the machine I want to share folders --MACHINE B: Windows Vista: Samba read/write share access works great, no problems --MACHINE C: Linux (running Debian/2.6) machine: SHARE ACCESS VERY SLOW/FAILS So, my problem is that when I attempt to share MACHINE A with MACHINE C, I see the following behavior: 1) Authentication Required dialog pops up, requesting authorization for [EMAIL PROTECTED] on DOMAIN_NAME (where DOMAIN_NAME is my workgroup name) 2) After providing a password, I get a second Authentication Required dialog, this time indicating authorization for [EMAIL PROTECTED] on DOMAIN_NAME (where USER_NAME is my user name) 3) After providing a password again, some time passes--on the order of 30-90 seconds--and this second dialog again is displayed. At this point, I either see this process repeated (repeat step 3 indefinitely), and never get access granted, or--after another 30-90 seconds--I finally receive access to the Samba shares. In the event I do get access granted, I have no problems with access for the rest of my session (until session restart or machine restart). So it seems something is getting cached. So, clearly, there appears to be some sort of negotiating happening here between MACHINE A (the Samba server) and MACHINE C (the Samba client). Some details: --Both machines are running Samba 3.0.24 --smb.conf is config'd with security = SHARE; specific shares with read only = No, and guest ok = Yes --I have no problems with share access between MACHINE A (NAS device: the Samba server) and MACHINE B (Windows Vista: the Samba client) So, here are my questions: --What might cause this kind of behavior? How can I get rid of these long authentication delays? --What tools are available to me for troubleshooting a Samba negotiation? Thanks much. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows host profile problem (write access denied)
Greetings, Some users on a Windows XP Professional host are (lately) unable to use their roaming profile. A Windows error message states that due to a security problem or a corrupt profile, that it is unusable. A second error message immediately following the first states that a temporary profile will be used and that any changes will not be saved. Other users are able to log on with their profile, but they are unable to save changes to it when logging off (the Windows error message suggests it is bad hardware or a network problem that prevents the write). The PDC is running Samba version 3.0.23c-2.el5.2.0.2 on CentOS 5.0 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18-8.1.4.5.el5xen. OpenLDAP is the backend (v 2.3.27-5). There are no obvious error messages on the Samba server. The following error message shows up only when the computer with problems is online: smbd[11981]: [2007/06/14 12:34:01.108071, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(1009) smbd[11981]: smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root.. Typing `smbstatus` on the PDC shows that the user logging on is being denied write access to the files in their profile. The output of smbstatus looks something like this: 11981 510 DENY_WRITE 0x20089 RDONLY NONE home dir profile item date The unix permissions are correct. No problems with other permissions from the Windows side (i.e., writing to H:) have appeared. Interestingly, Windows error messages regarding unable to write file foo to .../USER_A/windows/profile/... appear when USER_B logs in. Here's the Samba configuration file from the PDC (aka Asterix/ldap (and there's a BDC named Obelix/bdc/ldap2)): # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2007/05/15 15:24:29 [global] workgroup = FOO server string = Primary Domain Controller password server = * passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap.foo.com ldap://ldap2.foo.com; # log level = 0 # log level = 50 passdb:50 auth:20 winbind:20 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 debug hires timestamp = Yes smb ports = 139 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 logon script = %U.bat # logon path = \\%N\%U\windows\profile logon path = \\asterix\%U\windows\profile logon home = \\asterix\%U logon drive = H: domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = Yes security = User dns proxy = No wins support = Yes ldap admin dn = cn=ldapadmin,dc=foo,dc=com ldap group suffix = ou=Group ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap passwd sync = Yes ldap suffix = dc=foo,dc=com ldap ssl = no idmap backend = ldap:ldap://ldap.foo.com idmap uid = 16777216-33554431 idmap gid = 16777216-33554431 interfaces = eth0 192.168.10.13 lo 127.0.0.1 bind interfaces only = yes passwd chat debug = Yes template shell = /bin/false winbind use default domain = false [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon browseable = No [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [common] comment = stuff for everybody path = /export/common read only = No [papers] comment = Literature repository path = /export/papers read only = No [software] comment = useful programs path = /export/src read only = No [admin] comment = Administrative stuff path = /export/admin invalid users = user1 valid users = user2, user3 write list = user2, user3 read only = No create mask = 0740 security mask = 0770 directory mask = 0750 directory security mask = 0700 browseable = No [exec] comment = executive storage path = /export/exec invalid users = user1, user2 valid users = user3 read only = No create mask = 0740 security mask = 0770 directory mask = 0750 directory security mask = 0770 browseable = No [1815dn] comment = Dell 1815dn laser printer path = /var/spool/samba guest ok = Yes printable = Yes cups options = raw Thanks for your time+help! Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] can't browse via network neighbourhood
Hi, i'm running samba Version 3.0.22 on solaris 8. In my previous version of samba, windows users could browse to their shares through network neighbourhood. They can no longer do this and have to manually map each drive. Any ideas why this might be? My smb.conf is below. The error says the network name cannot be found TIA, Rich [global] workgroup = TEST server string = test Samba Server unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = bin, web, daemon, adm, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, nuucp, lp, listen, nobody create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1., localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No [shares] comment = File sharing area path = /data/shares/ valid users = trevor, thomas, kev, brian read only = No volume = data-share -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: password required when connecting from xp but not linux
yes, but not for mount point1 or point2 Marian wrote: Yuo have homes guest ok =yes . rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] napísal v správe news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I have samba version 3.0.22 installed on solaris 8. I have added users with smbpasswd -a. When mounting from an XP machine passwords are required, yet when mounting from fedora5 it prompts for a password but mounts irrespective of what is entered. Any ideas? TIA Rich # more /usr/local/samba_new/lib/smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2006/06/22 15:34:54 [global] workgroup = HOME server string = Unix Server unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = bin, web, daemon, adm, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, nuucp, lp, listen, nobody, noaccess create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1., localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No [point1] comment = point1 path = /point1 valid users = user1,user2,user3 read only = No [point2] comment = point2 path = /point2 valid users = user1,user2,user3 read only = No cut -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] password required when connecting from xp but not linux
Hi, I have samba version 3.0.22 installed on solaris 8. I have added users with smbpasswd -a. When mounting from an XP machine passwords are required, yet when mounting from fedora5 it prompts for a password but mounts irrespective of what is entered. Any ideas? TIA Rich # more /usr/local/samba_new/lib/smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2006/06/22 15:34:54 [global] workgroup = HOME server string = Unix Server unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = bin, web, daemon, adm, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, nuucp, lp, listen, nobody, noaccess create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1., localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No [point1] comment = point1 path = /point1 valid users = user1,user2,user3 read only = No [point2] comment = point2 path = /point2 valid users = user1,user2,user3 read only = No cut -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] using unix authentication (/etc/passwd)
Hi when using samba version Version 2.0.5a (I didn't compile) I never had to explicitly set up samba users with smbpasswd -a. Since upgrading to version 3.0.22 I now have to add each user otherwise I get the following in the logs [2006/06/15 14:20:46, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(317) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [richard] - [richard] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER When setting up I simply copied over the old version of smb.conf that I used to use. global] workgroup = GENOMICS server string = Genome Centre Samba Server (Mendel) unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 #log file = /usr/local/samba/var/samba.log.%m log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = root bin web daemon adm sync shutdown halt mail news uucp operator nuucp lp listen nobody noaccess nobody4 david gaget anna create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1. localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No I've tried setting encrypt password = no but this doesn't make any difference. Any ideas? TIA, Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] using unix authentication (/etc/passwd)
Gary Dale wrote: How are you adding users? adding users to the box with 'useradd' and now I also have to add users who want samba access with smbpasswd -a username as well. You don't seem to have an add user script! erm, no, must have missed that! Is there an example one in the samba dir? Look at the sample smb.conf files in the HowTo collection or the Samba by Example - both at www.samba.org. Also, you almost certainly want to encrypt passwords. I probably should do but haven't up till now I recommend installing SWAT if you haven't done so already and use its wizard to set your box up as a domain controller (since that seems to be how you want to use it). yes, I really should do, but didn't think i'd need to if I just copied over my previous smb.conf. thanks rich wrote: Hi when using samba version Version 2.0.5a (I didn't compile) I never had to explicitly set up samba users with smbpasswd -a. Since upgrading to version 3.0.22 I now have to add each user otherwise I get the following in the logs [2006/06/15 14:20:46, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(317) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [richard] - [richard] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER When setting up I simply copied over the old version of smb.conf that I used to use. global] workgroup = GENOMICS server string = Genome Centre Samba Server (Mendel) unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 #log file = /usr/local/samba/var/samba.log.%m log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = root bin web daemon adm sync shutdown halt mail news uucp operator nuucp lp listen nobody noaccess nobody4 david gaget anna create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1. localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No I've tried setting encrypt password = no but this doesn't make any difference. Any ideas? TIA, Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] using unix authentication (/etc/passwd)
Gary Dale wrote: How are you adding users? You don't seem to have an add user script! Look at the sample smb.conf files in the HowTo collection or the Samba by Example - both at www.samba.org. Also, you almost certainly want to encrypt passwords. ah, right, so i guess i need something along the lines of: /|passdb backend = tdbsam|//| printcap name = cups|//| add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -m %u|/ /|delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel -r %u|//| add group script = /usr/sbin/groupadd %g|//| delete group script = /usr/sbin/groupdel %g|//| add user to group script = /usr/sbin/groupmod -A %u %g|//| delete user from group script = /usr/sbin/groupmod -R %u %g|//| add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false -d /var/lib/nobody %u |/why didn't I needt his previously? /| |/ I recommend installing SWAT if you haven't done so already and use its wizard to set your box up as a domain controller (since that seems to be how you want to use it). rich wrote: Hi when using samba version Version 2.0.5a (I didn't compile) I never had to explicitly set up samba users with smbpasswd -a. Since upgrading to version 3.0.22 I now have to add each user otherwise I get the following in the logs [2006/06/15 14:20:46, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(317) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [richard] - [richard] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER When setting up I simply copied over the old version of smb.conf that I used to use. global] workgroup = GENOMICS server string = Genome Centre Samba Server (Mendel) unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 #log file = /usr/local/samba/var/samba.log.%m log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = root bin web daemon adm sync shutdown halt mail news uucp operator nuucp lp listen nobody noaccess nobody4 david gaget anna create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1. localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No I've tried setting encrypt password = no but this doesn't make any difference. Any ideas? TIA, Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smpasswd
Pierre MARC wrote: Le lun 19/06/2006 à 14:30, rich a écrit : /Pierre MARC wrote: Le lun 19/06/2006 à 12:46, rich a écrit : /Pierre MARC wrote: Le ven 16/06/2006 à 17:42, rich a écrit : /Pierre MARC wrote: Le ven 16/06/2006 à 15:04, rich a écrit : Hi, I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from my previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I never had to run smbpasswd -a username. It would do the authentication from /etc/passwd. ie when I added someone as a user with useradd they would automatically be able to mount samab shares. I am now having to add all my users with smbpasswd. I didn't compile the previous version. Could anyone tell me what I need to do to allow authentication from /etc/passwd? TIA, Rich [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = BLA unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = root bin web create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1. localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No Try encrypt password = no thanks. unfortunately it didn't make any difference mount -t cifs -o username=testing //mendel/testing /mnt/testing ount error 13 = Permission denied Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)/ What was your last samba version ? And OS ? Hi, my OS is Solaris 8 and my version of samba is 2.0.5a thanks r/ And If you try to use the smbmount command coming with the 3.0.22 version ? I am trying to mount from a linux box using smbmount that comes with fedora core 5. / -- Pierre MARC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] id3 Semiconductors / -- Pierre MARC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] id3 Semiconductors / OK, have you seen somethong wrong in the log.smb from the server or the client. If yes, it should be useful to post it. Hi Pierre, thanks for the help. what I was getting in the server logs was: [2006/06/15 14:05:28, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(317) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [richard] - [richard] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER which of course disappeared when i added the user with smbpasswd -a richard thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smpasswd
Pierre MARC wrote: Le ven 16/06/2006 à 17:42, rich a écrit : /Pierre MARC wrote: Le ven 16/06/2006 à 15:04, rich a écrit : Hi, I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from my previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I never had to run smbpasswd -a username. It would do the authentication from /etc/passwd. ie when I added someone as a user with useradd they would automatically be able to mount samab shares. I am now having to add all my users with smbpasswd. I didn't compile the previous version. Could anyone tell me what I need to do to allow authentication from /etc/passwd? TIA, Rich [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = BLA unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = root bin web create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1. localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No Try encrypt password = no thanks. unfortunately it didn't make any difference mount -t cifs -o username=testing //mendel/testing /mnt/testing ount error 13 = Permission denied Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)/ What was your last samba version ? And OS ? Hi, my OS is Solaris 8 and my version of samba is 2.0.5a thanks r -- Pierre MARC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] id3 Semiconductors -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smpasswd
Pierre MARC wrote: Le lun 19/06/2006 à 12:46, rich a écrit : /Pierre MARC wrote: Le ven 16/06/2006 à 17:42, rich a écrit : /Pierre MARC wrote: Le ven 16/06/2006 à 15:04, rich a écrit : Hi, I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from my previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I never had to run smbpasswd -a username. It would do the authentication from /etc/passwd. ie when I added someone as a user with useradd they would automatically be able to mount samab shares. I am now having to add all my users with smbpasswd. I didn't compile the previous version. Could anyone tell me what I need to do to allow authentication from /etc/passwd? TIA, Rich [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = BLA unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = root bin web create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1. localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No Try encrypt password = no thanks. unfortunately it didn't make any difference mount -t cifs -o username=testing //mendel/testing /mnt/testing ount error 13 = Permission denied Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)/ What was your last samba version ? And OS ? Hi, my OS is Solaris 8 and my version of samba is 2.0.5a thanks r/ And If you try to use the smbmount command coming with the 3.0.22 version ? I am trying to mount from a linux box using smbmount that comes with fedora core 5. / -- Pierre MARC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] id3 Semiconductors / -- Pierre MARC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] id3 Semiconductors -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smpasswd
Pierre MARC wrote: Le lun 19/06/2006 à 14:30, rich a écrit : /Pierre MARC wrote: Le lun 19/06/2006 à 12:46, rich a écrit : /Pierre MARC wrote: Le ven 16/06/2006 à 17:42, rich a écrit : /Pierre MARC wrote: Le ven 16/06/2006 à 15:04, rich a écrit : Hi, I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from my previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I never had to run smbpasswd -a username. It would do the authentication from /etc/passwd. ie when I added someone as a user with useradd they would automatically be able to mount samab shares. I am now having to add all my users with smbpasswd. I didn't compile the previous version. Could anyone tell me what I need to do to allow authentication from /etc/passwd? TIA, Rich [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = BLA unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = root bin web create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1. localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No Try encrypt password = no thanks. unfortunately it didn't make any difference mount -t cifs -o username=testing //mendel/testing /mnt/testing ount error 13 = Permission denied Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs)/ What was your last samba version ? And OS ? Hi, my OS is Solaris 8 and my version of samba is 2.0.5a thanks r/ And If you try to use the smbmount command coming with the 3.0.22 version ? I am trying to mount from a linux box using smbmount that comes with fedora core 5. / -- Pierre MARC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] id3 Semiconductors / -- Pierre MARC [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] id3 Semiconductors / OK, have you seen somethong wrong in the log.smb from the server or the client. If yes, it should be useful to post it. Hi Pierre, thanks for the help. what I was getting in the server logs was: [2006/06/15 14:05:28, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(317) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [richard] - [richard] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER which of course disappeared when i added the user with smbpasswd -a richard thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smpasswd
Hi, I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from my previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I never had to run smbpasswd -a username. It would do the authentication from /etc/passwd. ie when I added someone as a user with useradd they would automatically be able to mount samab shares. I am now having to add all my users with smbpasswd. I didn't compile the previous version. Could anyone tell me what I need to do to allow authentication from /etc/passwd? TIA, Rich [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = BLA unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = root bin web create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1. localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Fwd: Re: [Samba] smpasswd]
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smpasswd
Pierre MARC wrote: Le ven 16/06/2006 à 15:04, rich a écrit : Hi, I have just installed samba-3.0.22 and copied my smb.conf across from my previous version on the same machine. With my previous version I never had to run smbpasswd -a username. It would do the authentication from /etc/passwd. ie when I added someone as a user with useradd they would automatically be able to mount samab shares. I am now having to add all my users with smbpasswd. I didn't compile the previous version. Could anyone tell me what I need to do to allow authentication from /etc/passwd? TIA, Rich [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = BLA unix password sync = Yes log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 wins support = Yes invalid users = root bin web create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 hosts allow = 192.168.1. localhost [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /userdata/home/%u read only = No guest ok = Yes browseable = No Try encrypt password = no thanks. unfortunately it didn't make any difference mount -t cifs -o username=testing //mendel/testing /mnt/testing ount error 13 = Permission denied Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g.man mount.cifs) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Intermittant browsing problems
Rich Mozingo Assistant General Manager Lakewood BlueClaws 732-901-7000 x 103 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Difficulty converting from RH 7.3 to Debian Sarge
I am running debian sarge 2.4.27-3-686 and samba version 3.0.14a-Debian . The previous machine was running rh 7.3 (valhalla) 2.4.20-29.7.progeny.11, samba version unknown. I have restored all shares and directories. Most of users can access everything, however our login script will not run. For those users that cannot log in re-joining them to the domain not only works but then the login script runs as well. Obviously we are missing a key file from the old machine that relates to the machine accounts. I copied all the .tdb files over and placed them in the appropriate dirs, but still it won't work. I don't want to have to disjoin and re-join all my users since then all their information will need to be copied over to the newly created profile. Any and all help is appreciated. .tdb files copied over: -brlock.tdb -connections.tdb -locking.tdb -messages.tdb -ntdrivers.tdb -ntforms.tdb -ntprinters.tdb -printing.tdb -secret.tdb -sessionid.tdb -share_info.tdb -unexpected.tdb -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Active Directory and Samba 3.0.20
This is a new install with a very novice samba user . We are running samba 3.0.20 on a Solaris 9 server. We have 3 domains controllers - 1 old NT and 1Win 2000 Active Directory and 1 Win 2003 Active Directory. The support group that administers the domains, have a limited skill set. If its not Windows they have nothing to contribute. The Domain Controllers are called TACOMANEWS - Win 22000 TACOMA - Win 2003 IS_DEPT - NT4 When running wbinfo -m on TACOMANEWS it sees IS_DEPT and TACOMA When running wbinfo -m on IS_DEPT it sees TACOMA When running wbinfo -m on TACOMA it sees TACOMANEWS and TACOMA Checking users in all the domains, the only users that are seen are the ones in the IS_DEPT and TACOMA. Even when joined to TACOMANEWS, it shows no users for this domain. There are at least 80 users in the TACOMANEWS domain. I think there should be users showing for TACOMANEWS, but our support group does not know why. Can anyone offer some insight or point me to some documentation on the issue. I have googled a lot but haven't found what I need. Samba is running as a member of a domain. Below is my smb.conf file, this is very generic. Thanks for any and all help [global] force directory mode = 775 create mode = 777 acl compatibility = auto dns proxy = no force create mode = 775 encrypt passwords = yes idmap gid = 1-2 socket options = TCP_NODELAY max log size = 50 password server = * idmap uid = 1-2 writeable = yes directory mode = 777 security = DOMAIN winbind use default domain = yes server string = zThorin workgroup = TACOMANEWS local master = no log level = 1 print command = lpr -h -r -P%p %s netbios name = zthorin log file = /usr/local/samba/var/%m.log os level = 20 [Fango] path = /fango/gongo printable = no public = yes create mask = 777 directory mask = 777 Richard Bonfoey The News Tribune Information Systems Successfully Meeting the Business Needs of The News Tribune through Information Technology Richard Bonfoey The News Tribune Information Systems Successfully Meeting the Business Needs of The News Tribune through Information Technology -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Rsync cifs or smbfs - cannot update modification date with cifs
I use rsync to update files to a samba shared folder on another machine. If the remote drive is mounted as smbfs in fstab: //xx.xx.xx.35/YellowDog /mnt/mic smbfs username=xxx,password=xxx Then everything works fine. However if I mount it as cifs run rsync, the date/time on the remote files is that of the transfer, not of the original file creation/modification date. Therefore rsync transfers are messed up because it uses the date to work out if a file should be copied or not. Local machine is debian sarge, remote system is OSX 10.3. Using smbfs works fine the dates are correctly preserved across to the remote machine, but I understand that cifs is the way forward, so I'd like to get it working with cifs. What am I doing wrong? The remote directory files are owned by the username specified in fstab, and are permission 755 (directories) or 644 (files). The rsync command line I'm using is rsync -rt --delete --modify-window=1 /source /mnt/mic. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] can't get samba 3.0.14a to work with ldap..part 2: smaba 3.0.15
Hi... I posted a few days ago that I was having trouble getting samba 3.0.14a to work with ldap. I switched up to 3.0.15pre2 and had much the same trouble. I have been following the instructions in http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-Guide.pdf, but I am still having troubles. Here is what happens when i run smbldap-populate: mercury:/usr/local/samba/sbin# ./smldap-populate -a root -k 0 -m 0 Populating LDAP directory for domain TESTNET (S-1-5-21-4179843118-1526938909-891067941) (using builtin directory structure) Use of uninitialized value in string ne at ./smbldap-populate line 165 Use of uninitialized value in concactenation (.) or string at ./smbldap-populate line 170 entry o=ssfsnet already exist. adding new entry: ou=People,o=ssfsnet adding new entry: ou=Groups,o=ssfsnet adding new entry: ou=Computers,o=ssfsnet Can't call method dn on an undefined value at ./smbldap-populate line 442, GEN1 line 6. mercury:/usr/local/samba/sbin# I can't figure out what is wrong...The smb.conf is taken straight from the documentation and the smbldap tools should be properly configured. Every thing is by the book but I still can't seem to get it working. Could somebody perhaps post somewhere a working smb.conf and perhaps a slapcat dump (minus users, of course) or even a working smbldap.conf? I know I'm probably just missing something stupid, but I am out of ideas Thanks in advance, Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] can't get samba 3.0.14a to work with ldap..part 2: smaba=?ISO-8859-1?Q? 3.0.15?=
The ldap tools are 8.8. Previous versions have worked to some extent, but as I posted earlier, I still can't get samba to cooperate. The ldap and crypt perl modules are installed and working. I was having difficulty with 3.0.14a and was told to read the http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-Guide.pdf book. This is as far as I could get. LDAP authentication is working for unix accounts, but not for samba. Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] can't get samba 3.0.14a to work with ldap..part 2: smaba=?ISO-8859-1?Q? 3.0.15?=
John, I certainly didn't mean to sound as though I was bashing the documentation, I am only bashing myself for not being able to figure out what I am doing wrong. The only reason I stressed that my config was straight from the documentation was to provide a clearer picture of my setup, and to point out that I was taking your advice and trying to work through the examples given. I have started again from scratch with samba-3.0.15pre2 and I will send you your requested config files shortly. Thanks, and again, I certainly did not mean to bash the documentation. I fully realize that a lot of work goes into it and I am grateful for samba and all it has done for me over the past 10 years since my first install. Rich Rich, Instead of assuming the examples in the book are wrong, or do not work, just because you can not get them to work, may I suggest that you work with me to fix the documentation so others can avoid your pain. Please send me direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED] the following: -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] can't get samba 3.0.14a to work with ldap
Try creating a user with the -a switch to smbldap-useradd Matt Yeah, I figured that out after i posted, but when I create a new user using that switch, something else happens now: mercury:/usr/local/samba/bin# ./smbclient //mercury/richard -U richard protocol negotiation failed mercury:/usr/local/samba/bin# Now i'm really lost. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] can't get samba 3.0.14a to work with ldap
Thanks, I will check it out. Mostly I have been using the htmldocs/Samba-Guide/happy.html, but things have obviously changed a bit since that was written Also, i did realize after my initial post that I had missed the argument to smbldap-useradd script, but that didn't really solve the major issues I seem to be having Thanks, Rich Rich, Much documentation has been written to help our users. It is always a challenge to help them to find it. When they do find it, it is even more of a challenge to get them to help us to improve it so that others will have a perfect experience. Just this time, maybe you can help us to perfect our documentation. Please check out chapter 6 of the book Samba-3 by Example that is currently under copy edit before going into print. You can download this from our web site at: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-Guide.pdf The documentation provides a step-by-step explanation of each file that must be configured to achive a working Samba+LDAP server. If any steps fails, please let me know as soon as possible so I can fix it before we lock this in. Thanks. PS: When you ran smbldap-useradd you did not include the -a option that creates the SambaSAM entries. - John T. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] can't get samba 3.0.14a to work with ldap
Hi... If you have successfully gotten samba 3.0.14a (or any other recent samba version) to work with ldap, can you perhaps email me your various config files so I can figure out what I am doing wrong? Any help would be greatly appreciated. I've tried every thing I can think of, but I can't get samba 3.0.14a to work with ldap. The ldap server seems to be working and smbclient seems to work for Administrator but not anyone else but I can't join any machines to the domain (XP has given me many different errors, but the most recent is the specified network name is no longer available) I am assuming that posting long messages with every config file attatched is probably not going to win me any friends, so i have put them on the web at http://thor.ssfs.org/samba/ Thanks in advance, Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.x in ADS mode in a Windows Krb AD forest domain, does it work?
Hi, With some luck someone on this list can tell me if what I'm trying to do is possible with Samba 3, and if I'm really lucky how to get it working. As I'm pretty stuck at the moment and have hit the limits of my knowledge. At present in my environment we are running numerous Samba 2 servers in server and domain level security (I know server level security is a bad idea), and everything works fine. However as time moves on we are looking to migrate our servers off Samba 2 and onto Samba 3 and switch all servers over to ads mode. However during testing (on Debian and HP-UX machines) we appear to have hit a problem that I can't resolve, namely I can't connect to any shares, as the servers don't appear to recognize the login domain. For this to make any sense I will attempt to explain our environment. At present we have an old legacy domain which is all based around NT trusts, and a new domain which uses Kerberos AD forest trusts. Now in our new domain we have central domain, with other sub domains hanging off it for users (one per geography) and organisational units (again one per OU unit). Now the way the domain has been configured is that user accounts live in the the user domains, and machine accounts live in the organisational units domains, all pretty simple. However when connecting to a Samba 3 host configured in ads mode that has successfully joined the OU domain we hit a problem that the server doesn't seem to recognise the login domain, and remaps the domain to the local OU and hence the login fails, as this logfile extract shows. [2004/12/16 11:02:27, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(219) check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the new password interface [2004/12/16 11:02:27, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(222) check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004/12/16 11:02:27, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(256) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/12/16 11:02:27, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(365) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/12/16 11:02:27, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(288) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/12/16 11:02:28, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(386) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2004/12/16 11:02:28, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(312) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [ricc] - [ricc] FAILED with err or NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED However if I try and connect to an admin account that lives in the OUDOMAIN, everything works as Samba appears to recognize the domain as valid. As an additional test, I have tried to connect to the share using an old account in the Legacy domain which uses the old NTLM NT trust mechanisms, and this appears to work as the Samba server recognizes the domain, and hence leaves the domain prefix alone, as this logfile extract shows. [2004/12/16 11:26:47, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(219) check_ntlm_password: Checking password for unmapped user [EMAIL PROTECTED] RDWELL-R-3] with the new password interface [2004/12/16 11:26:47, 3] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(222) check_ntlm_password: mapped user is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004/12/16 11:26:47, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(256) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2004/12/16 11:26:47, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(365) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 So I guess my question is: Has anyone else managed to get samba to work in this kind of domain? or alternatively does anyone know if Samba 3 supports this kind of domain structure using Forest AD trusts yet? Thanks in advance, for any help you can provide, as this has been driving me (not so) slowly nuts. Rich Cardwell -- smb.conf for testhosts is as follows: #=== Global Settings === [global] ## Browsing/Identification ### # Change this to the workgroup/NT-domain name your Samba server will part of workgroup = OUDOMAIN.HPL.HP.COM debug level = 4 # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field server string = %L server (Samba %v) # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable its WINS Server wins support = no # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both wins server = XX.XX.XX.net # This will prevent nmbd to search for NetBIOS names through DNS. dns proxy = no # What naming service and in what order should we use to resolve host names # to IP addresses ; name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast Debugging/Accounting # This tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). max log size = 1000 # If you want
Re: [Samba] Roaming Profile Folder Redirection Problems
Sorry about the top post... John and list... I have figured out what my problem was with Chaper 6 of Samba 3 By Example. Table 6.3 (page 167 of the print copy) has some incorrect values. That table says to set the Cache directory key, for example, to: \\%LOGONSERVER%\profdata\%USERNAME%\InternetFiles That is incorrect! The leading \\ characters cause the profile path to be unreachable, as I believe the path would then expand to: SMB-PDC\profdata\testuser\InternetFiles. Removing the two leading \ characters fixed all my problems on both Windows 2000 and XP. Both the print versions and the web versions of Samba 3 By Example have this typo in multiple places in section 6.6.1. (Step 3 under Redirect Folders In Default User Profile has it as an example of a network redirection that contains a macro, as well as the aforementioned Table 6.3 errors.) The web version of TOSHARG, Chapter 23, does not contain this error and is what led me to figuring out what I was going incorrectly. Rich Edelman On Sunday 10 October 2004 09:43 pm, John H Terpstra wrote: Rich, I have seen a number of reports of problems with the procedure I outlined in the book. Rest assured that this was well tested prior to publication. Additionally, there are some large sites in Europe that use roaming profiles in precisely this fashion. That leaves us with the problem of the need to identify what you have done that is different, or to identify what is different in your client Windows configuration. I regret that at this time I do not have time to assist you further, however I am keen to hear of any progress you make in solving the issue and would much appreciate any comments that can be added to the chapter to help others to avoid your pain. Cheers, John T. On Sunday 10 October 2004 13:19, Rich Edelman wrote: I'm running Samba 3.0.7 on SuSE 9.1 with OpenLDAP for auth. I've been mostly following along Terpstra's Book Samba 3 By Example, as lots of other people here have been. The three big problems I'm having are: 1) After a Windows XP user logs out for the first time, upon next login they get an error message saying Windows cannot log you in because your profile cannot be loaded. Deleting the NTUSER.DAT file for that user allows that user to log in again. 2) It doesn't appear like the default user profile (located in /var/lib/samba/netlogon/Default User/) is getting used for anything, as when I log in for the first time and view the registry any changes that I made for the default user are not there! 3) This one will probably be solved by #2 above, but whenever a user logs out, there is that stupid 'synchronizing' window, even though all profile folders have been redirected to a network drive. Why? Any help or suggestions on these would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Rich Edelman -- John H Terpstra Samba-Team Member Phone: +1 (650) 580-8668 Author: The Official Samba-3 HOWTO Reference Guide, ISBN: 0131453556 Samba-3 by Example, ISBN: 0131472216 Hardening Linux, ISBN: 0072254971 OpenLDAP by Example, ISBN: 0131488732 Other books in production. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Roaming Profile Folder Redirection Problems
Replies inline :) On Monday 11 October 2004 11:56 am, Richard Michael wrote: Hi Rich, I have also built my XP clients w/ RP+FolderRedir. I haven't seen all the problems you've described, but am having my own share of difficulties. I'd be interested if you encounter them, see my earlier post (a few days back) if you're curious. 1) After a Windows XP user logs out for the first time, upon next login they get an error message saying Windows cannot log you in because your profile cannot be loaded. Deleting the NTUSER.DAT file for that user allows that user to log in again. I haven't seen this, but have read notes about the accumulation of .tmp in the profile (Windows creates them) files possibly causing this problem. Are you seeing .tmp files if you look at the profile, during or after logoff (but prior to the next logon)? There is no accumulation of .tmp files in the profile at all. I do think the profile is getting corrupted, though. After configuring the logging you mentioned below, I noticed that upon second login, Windows tries to merge the mandatory profile it copied over from the default profile with a user profile, which for some reason fails, and does not allow me to log on. Are there supposed to be both ntuser.dat and ntuser.man files in a profile? I'm really not much of a windows guy, heh. 2) It doesn't appear like the default user profile (located in /var/lib/samba/netlogon/Default User/) is getting used for anything, as when I log in for the first time and view the registry any changes that I made for the default user are not there! What profile is used for the new user? For example, is XP copying the C:\Documents and Settings\Default User profile? Perhaps it's not finding your [netlogon] share? You've verified all permissions on the Unix side and in the smb.conf file? Can you see the profile being copied if you sniff smb or read the logs? Okay, it is copying the profile from the [netlogon] share. I was confused because apparently Windows changes the registry keys after you are logged in back to '%USERPROFILE%/blah' instead of keeping '%LOGONSERVER%/profiles/%USERNAME%/blah' like I have in the default profile. Also, you can turn on quite a bit of logging in XP by setting this reg key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\WindowsNT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon = [REG_DWORD] UserEnvDebugLevel = 0x30002 The log file is in C:\Windows\Debug\UserMode .. (if memory serves..) Wow, lots of logs! I can compare perms and settings with you if it helps, my [netlogon] profile is used properly. Also, are you doing anything with Group Policy items on the XP side that would altered your expected Default User environment? (The logging above will show you this..) The only group policy I have set is I have disabled offline files entirely, I have altered the exclusion lists to include redirected folders, and I have turned off the ownership check for the profile. All (with the exception of the offline files) are as outlined in Chapter 6 of Samba-3 By Example. FWIW, I have also experimented with keeping offline files enabled and turning off the 'synchronize files before logon' and 'synchronize files after logout' options. That last option did away with the synchronization window I was getting. I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that I am not redirecting all the folders in the profile. Evidently, XP wants client side caching on the profile location disabled (I saw complaints in the Event Log). Perhaps this is causing problems? To do so, add to the [profiles] section of smb.conf: csc policy = disabled I don't think Terpstra's book mentions this but it's in the smb.conf man page. I added the 'csc policy = disabled' line to the [profiles] section of my smb.conf file, but the event viewer still has complaints from WinXP about the profiles share being configured for automatic caching. 3) This one will probably be solved by #2 above, but whenever a user logs out, there is that stupid 'synchronizing' window, even though all profile folders have been redirected to a network drive. Why? Isn't this Offline Files on the XP side? I have disabled this at the system level, because I didn't want user's dealing with any sync problems. Have you disabled Offline File Caching for at least the folders you have redirected? Try disabling it altogether; set this GP: Computer configuration Admin templates Network Offline files Allow or disallow use of offline files = Disabled As I said above, I have experimented with that setting, as well as some others. I did forget to mention that I also enabled this GP: User configuration Admin Templates Network Offline Files Do not automatically make redirected folders available offline. That's the only way I could figure out to disable offline file caching for the redirected folders. Is there another
[Samba] smbfs mounts cause hangs in kde/gnome
I'm using debian Sarge, Samba 3.0.6-3, Kernel 2.6.8 I use smbmount //server/share mymountpt -oguest which connects fine, but it all dies (hangs) if I try to look in that mounted directory with konqueror in kde OR nautillus in gnome. In dmesg of the server computer I get: smb_proc_readdir_long: error=-512, breaking and the same but with error -13 smb_add_request ... Timed Out! this last one repeats infinitely. and often some other stuff too. I've googled till I'm goggled and all I've found is similar postings but without answers. thanks rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: RE : Convert DS20 from Tru64 to VMS
Hello, considering that the source system was a turbochannel box, its not strange. I have a similar machine. At the console, only one string of disks is visible to a sho dev command. _after booting_, the remianing 2 strings show up, and the controller lettering (ie dkA or dkB...) has changed. Turbo channel is wierdwhich may explain why PCI became the industry standard. regards, denny COLLOT Jean-Yves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds strange that you see the boot disk and you don't see the other ones, even the CD drive. Do you see any other device, such as the Ethernet adapter(s) ? If you don't, could you check the value of your STARTUP_P1 SYSGEN parameter ? JYC -Message d'origine- De : Claude Marinier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 21 juin 2004 18:50 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Convert DS20 from Tru64 to VMS Greetings, Appologies for asking a question which is off-topic. I want to retire the old DEC 3000 Model 400. I thought that I could just copy the VMS files to a pair of larger disks, attach them to the DS20 (got it from a project that ended), change a few settings at the console, and boot. VMS runs but the SCSI devices that are visible from the console before booting are not visible from VMS (I cannot even see the CD-ROM drive, only the boot disk is visible). For the last few years, the other systems (Solaris, Linux, and Windows) have taken all my time and I have not done much on the VMS systems. I have forgotten too much and I am stuck. Could someone point me to a VMS/Alpha mailing list where I can get help? Yes, I tried Google but have not found anything useful. What I have seen leads me to think that this may be more difficult than I thought. Thank you. -- Claude Marinier, Information Technology Defence Research Development Canada (Ottawa) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ottawa.drdc-rddc.gc.ca Telephone: (613) 596-3103 PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Set up problems (apologies if this *did* get out before)
Hi Folks, I'm trying to set up Samba_2.2-8 for VMS (I did the linking from sources); I had the same problem with 2.2-7a that I'm running into now, so I upgraded to 2.2-8 in case it corrected a problem. Has anybody seen this before? Test3 in DIAGNOSIS.TXT has not been able to shed any light as to what I'm running into. I've got about 4 days into this, would like to see where I'm going wrong. Brian Tillman gave me an assist last month - thanks Brian, it did get me further along to this point. * VIA04::[RJHEARN]_ VIA04::[RJHEARN]_smbclient -L via04 load_unicode_map: filename /samba_root/lib/codepages/unicode_map.ISO8859-1 does not exist. added interface ip=10.7.40.71 bcast=10.7.41.255 nmask=255.255.254.0 added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0 Password: Anonymous login successful Domain=[VIA04] OS=[OpenVMS] Server=[Samba 2.2.8] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME VIA04::[RJHEARN]_ VIA04::[RJHEARN]_smbclient //via04/tmp load_unicode_map: filename /samba_root/lib/codepages/unicode_map.ISO8859-1 does not exist. added interface ip=10.7.40.71 bcast=10.7.41.255 nmask=255.255.254.0 added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0 Password: Anonymous login successful Domain=[VIA04] OS=[OpenVMS] Server=[Samba 2.2.8] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME VIA04::[RJHEARN]_ * Would anyone be willing to run samba_root[bin]testparm post the entire dump of the service definitions it displays of the smb.conf? Would anyone be willing to show the entire directory structure of samba_device:[Samba...]*.* showing ownership protections (acl's too)for it on a working system? I have tried just about everything I can think of with no success. Btw: This appears to work, so some things are correct... VIA04::[RJHEARN]_nmblookup -B via04 __SAMBA__ querying __samba__ on 10.7.40.71 10.7.40.71 __samba__00 VIA04::[RJHEARN]_ Thoughts welcomed, Thanks, Rich === Rich Hearn personal phone: 802-847-8015 Fletcher Allen Health Care 24hr Helpdesk: 802-847-8100 Information Servicespager: 802-351-7249 One Burlington Square Burlington, VT 05401email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Confidentiality Notice: This message, and any attachments, may contain information that is confidential, privileged, and/or protected from disclosure under state and federal laws that deal with the privacy and security of medical information. If you received this message in error or through inappropriate means, please reply to this message to notify the Sender that the message was received by you in error, and then permanently delete this message from all storage media, without forwarding or retaining a copy. PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Is there a secret to getting this to run with Multinet 4.4a?
Hi all, This is what I'm seeing in log.smbd - I can't see any drives to map. Is there anything obvious that this indicates I'm failing to set up? Thoughts welcomed Merry Christmas, Rich VIA04::[RJHEARN]_type dsa0:[samba]log.smbd [2003/12/24 12:27:03, 0] DISK$SWAP:[JYC.SAMBA.WORK.SOURCE.LIB]UTIL_SOCK.C;2:(169) Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error bad address) [2003/12/24 12:27:03, 0] DISK$SWAP:[JYC.SAMBA.WORK.SOURCE.LIB]UTIL_SOCK.C;2:(169) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error bad address) [2003/12/24 12:27:03, 0] DISK$SWAP:[JYC.SAMBA.WORK.SOURCE.LIB]UTIL_SOCK.C;2:(1020) getpeername failed. Error was system service failure exception, status=!xl, pc=!xh, ps=!xl [2003/12/24 12:27:03, 0] DISK$SWAP:[JYC.SAMBA.WORK.SOURCE.LIB]UTIL_SOCK.C;2:(169) Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error bad address) [2003/12/24 12:27:03, 0] DISK$SWAP:[JYC.SAMBA.WORK.SOURCE.LIB]UTIL_SOCK.C;2:(169) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error bad address) VIA04::[RJHEARN]_ === Rich Hearn personal phone: 802-847-8015 Fletcher Allen Health Care 24hr Helpdesk: 802-847-8100 Information Servicespager: 802-351-7249 One Burlington Square Burlington, VT 05401email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Confidentiality Notice: This message, and any attachments, may contain information that is confidential, privileged, and/or protected from disclosure under state and federal laws that deal with the privacy and security of medical information. If you received this message in error or through inappropriate means, please reply to this message to notify the Sender that the message was received by you in error, and then permanently delete this message from all storage media, without forwarding or retaining a copy. PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: [Samba] User Addition Automatically
Original Message - From: David Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:12 PM Subject: [Samba] User Addition Automatically I would like to be able to have this set up so that when I add a user on the Windows 2000 domain that the user gets added on the Linux box automatically. I'd like the user to also be authenticated off the windows domain. So if a user changes their password on windows then everything is synced up. If someone can point me in the direction to get this done that'd be great. I'm not even sure if I can do this. The thing you are looking for is winbind. The Samba HOW-TO collection (http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf) has an entire section on winbind and how to set it up. I have been successful in setting this up in a test environment, however I am having a bit of trouble making it work in a production environment because my production server has something different going on than my test server. I can give you my sample config if you want it, however I am just using what is listed in the howto. Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] WIN XP Logging on after joining domain
- Original Message - From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rich Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 9:49 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] WIN XP Logging on after joining domain -- possible bug? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rich Webb wrote: | I am running samba version 3.0.1pre1 | | I was able to join my XP machine to my samba domain without problems, | however after joining, I cannot log in. ... | [2003/10/16 19:50:46, 1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(821) | User nobody in passdb, but getpwnam() fails! ~ error message is pretty clear here. Looks like your have a problem with your guest account. Thanks Jerry, that was the fix. This might be a clear message to you, however I did not know (and I don't know if it is clear in the docs) that samba uses the nobody account for guest. Further, I am running this on a home built linux from scratch (LFS)box that prior to tonight did not have a nobody account. Most all the documentation assumes that the user is running some main line distribution of linux (which probably most are) and leaves out some details that are important, yet are default in a main line distro. In any case, I really appreciate you helping me out with this one. I can now log in. The fix was that I created a nobody user in my /etc/passwd and added it to my samba passdb, however now that I think about it, I probably don't need it in the passdb as the error says it is already there. Thanks Again! Rich. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] WIN XP Logging on after joining domain -- possible bug?
I am running samba version 3.0.1pre1 I was able to join my XP machine to my samba domain without problems, however after joining, I cannot log in. Nmbd is running and smbd is set at debug level 2. Here is an excerpt from the log: [2003/10/16 19:50:44, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(105) netbios connect: name1=OTHELLO name2=ROMEO [2003/10/16 19:50:44, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(112) netbios connect: local=othello remote=romeo, name type = 0 [2003/10/16 19:50:44, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(535) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2003/10/16 19:50:44, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(535) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2003/10/16 19:50:44, 1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(821) User nobody in passdb, but getpwnam() fails! [2003/10/16 19:50:44, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(309) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [] - [] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER [2003/10/16 19:50:46, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(105) netbios connect: name1=OTHELLO name2=ROMEO [2003/10/16 19:50:46, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(112) netbios connect: local=othello remote=romeo, name type = 0 [2003/10/16 19:50:46, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(535) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2003/10/16 19:50:46, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(535) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2003/10/16 19:50:46, 1] auth/auth_util.c:make_server_info_sam(821) User nobody in passdb, but getpwnam() fails! [2003/10/16 19:50:46, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(309) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [] - [] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER [2003/10/16 19:50:46, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(558) Closing connections Othello is my server and Romeo is my workstation. I notice that in the section about check_ntlm_password there is no name in the [] and I would expect there to be. Any suggestions? Here is the important stuff in my config: [global] netbios name = othello workgroup = webbhq passdb backend = tdbsam os level = 33 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes security = user domain logons = yes logon path = \\othello\profiles\%u logon drive = h: add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 101 -s /bin/false -M %u [netlogon] path = /server/netlogon read only = yes write list = ntadmin [profiles] path = /server/profiles read only = no create mask = 600 directory mask = 0700 Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Help with Office / Samba samba-2.2.7a on FreeBSD 4.9-RC
- Original Message - From: J. Nyhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Scottie Swenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 8:17 PM Subject: [Samba] Help with Office / Samba samba-2.2.7a on FreeBSD 4.9-RC Greetings, System: FreeBSD 4.9-RC Samba: 2.2.7a I have a weird SAMBA problem. On my XP Pro box against our Samba server (been online and such for long time) from Office XP only when ever I save a document it gets set as read only. Hence I only get one save for any given document. This is a new problem and is affecting only office XP. Other accounts other then mine do not have this problem. I have tried adding in things like force create mask, force security, etc. No help at all. Have you played around with the file locking options? Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: domain groups accessing samba share
- Original Message - From: Gavin Davenport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:14 PM Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: domain groups accessing samba share Ok - I replaced my /etc/pam.d/login with the one you've posted. getent still lists me just local machine users and groups. Do you have the following in your /etc/nsswitch.conf: passwdfileswinbind groupfileswinbind shadowfiles Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] winbind use default domain doesn't work on samba 3.0.0
- Original Message - From: Fabrice Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:01 PM Subject: [Samba] winbind use default domain doesn't work on samba 3.0.0 Hi, On my 2 Debian boxes the option winbind use default domain = yes doesn't make any difference any more where as it dit work just before the rest works fine, but not this option in smb.conf. I've discussed the matter on the French Samba mailing-list and I seem not to be the only one who's got this problem. The other person uses winbind with ADS, where as i'm still using it in mixed mode. So do you guys have the same problem? Samba 3 + winbinbd. Could you try to tell me if it's a bug or not. The problem is fixed in Samba-3.0.1pre1. rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: domain groups accessing samba share
- Original Message - From: Gavin Davenport [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 4:13 AM Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: domain groups accessing samba share Hi there Make this: valid users = @LABOR\domain admins write list = @LABOR\domain admins write useres = @LABOR\domain admins What if the domain user doesn't have a local user on the unix machine ? How do I get round that ?? That is where winbind comes in. You use winbind to allow your domain users from your NT/2k server to be seen by the samba box as normal unix users. Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3 ADS: nobody can log in
- Original Message - From: Ron Gage [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 1:32 PM Well, I got past the part about the ads server parameter... :) Now, it appears that nobody in the AD Domain can log into (and use) any resources on the Samba share. If I set security = ads on Samba, then nobody can log into the server - period. A couple of silly questions at this point (before I go completely mad)... 1) Is there any requirement that LDAP be functioning on the Samba machine? 2) Are there any hidden dependancies (like PAM) that are required to make this work? More background: The Samba machine has successfully joined the domain (it shows up in AD Users and Computers), kinit works fine when logging in as Administrator. The way I understand it, LDAP and Kerberos need to be functioning for Samba ADS integration to work. Is there a compelling reason to use it in ADS mode? I use PAM and Winbind so I can control access from windows 2k. That works quite well. Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 as Active Directory Domain Controller withMIT Kerberos
- Original Message - From: John H Terpstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jane Deer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 3:38 PM What is inaccurate please? I am ready to fix it! You are apparently one of the authors of the samba HOWTO collection. I would just first like to say thank you for an awesome document. It helped immensly for resolving my weekend of hair pulling. I was wondering if perhaps you could add something in the winbind section about how to configure a samba share using NT or 2k domain groups. I found out the hard way that if I leave the configuration directive winbind use default domain = yes then I cannot in any way specify a domain group as the valid users for a share (unless there is a way that I don't know). I tried just the group name, I tried the domain name+group name, then I removed the + as the seperator and tried domain name\group name. Nothing worked. Once I removed the use default domain directive, I was able to fully specify a group and it worked great! This just means that logging into the linux box as a windows user is a little more painful. Rich. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 as Active Directory Domain ControllerwithMIT Kerberos
Did you try: @group Also, check with the current code, I think there were some bugs fixed here. But this isn't a documentation flaw, it's just a bug - file it in bugzilla.samba.org if you can reproduce on 3.0.1pre1. Yep.. I tried @group @DOMAIN+group @DOMAIN\group +group +DOMAIN\group. It only worked when I removed the winbind use default domain = yes and then used @DOMAIN\group I also had to remove winbind seperator = + which from what I have been reading, the + seems to be a bad idea anyway. Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0 as Active Directory Domain Controller withMIT Kerberos
I plan to update the winbind section significantly over the next month or two. Thanks for the input. Just to let you know, per Andrew Bartlett I tried the newest version (3.0.1pre1) and it fixes the problem I talked about. I can now just specify the group and use the winbind use default domain=yes Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] PAM-Winbind authentication working but can't use domain groups
I have successfully set up samba 3.0, PAM, Winbind and joined my samba server to a windows 2000 domain. I can log into my linux box as a domain user and that all works fine. I am having trouble trying to figure out how to set up access to a samba share based on an Active Directory group. Here is my smb.conf file: [global] winbind separator = ` idmap uid = 1-2 winbind gid = 1-2 winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes workgroup = testsys security = domain password server = testdc template shell = /bin/bash template homedir = /home/%U winbind use default domain = yes [shared] path = /svr/shared valid users = +TESTSYS`Shared writeable = yes browseable = yes Now in the shared section, I have tried the following for valid users: valid users = @Shared valid users = @TESTSYS+Shared(with the seperator being a +) valid users = +Shared (with seperator being a `) valid users = +TESTSYS`Shared All attempts to access the share failed. The permissions on the directory are: drwxr-xr-x2 rwebbShared 4096 Oct 11 15:44 shared When trying to access this share from the win2k server, it pops up the Connect As box and does not let me proceed. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: PAM-Winbind authentication working but can't use domain groups (FIXED)
- Original Message - From: Rich Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 8:17 PM I am having trouble trying to figure out how to set up access to a samba share based on an Active Directory group. Here is my smb.conf file: In order to make it work, I had to take out the lines winbind use default domain = yes, and winbind seperator = + and then fully specify the domain group in my share definition as such: [shared] path = /svr/shared valid users = @TESTSYS\shared (or @TESTSYS\Domain Users if there are spaces in the group) writeable = yes browseable = yes force group = TESTSYS\shared I think this could be a bug that it does not accept only valid users = shared while winbind use default domain = yes. It appears that samba is not correctly matching the group the domain controllers group. The + is not a good seperator because if you read about the valid users directive, it uses a + to specify a unix group. Hope this helps someone! Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba - Active Directory and folder level perm.
I have samba 2.2.7 installed on a Sol8 unix box I have also config'ed Winbind. My aim is to map my samba share to my win2k Active Directory server - and apply folder lever permision ie.. \\samba-server\home-share%username%\ however I am seeing only SIDs Everyone and Administrator in the security tab of my share [sub]folders. It there a way to implement folder level security on Active Directory server of samba mounted shares? I can see my users from wbinfo -u -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: samba as a replacement for ftp
Francis Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi all, My organization is thinking of using samba to replace the current ftp service that we offer, because it is very easy to use and encrypted passwords are built in Windows (for authentication). We are running a Solaris 5.8 machine with Samba 2.2 installed. We tested samba in our LAN and it works great. However, this service is meant for users to connect from home. What do we have to do to make samba work over a routed network? Should we use a WINS server (using samba), special DNS server? I am very new to samba so please have a little patience in my basic questions. =) I would recommend setting up a vpn server and dole out a private IP address to the remote users. Once they are on your network, browsing should work fine. Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 2.2.7a logon script will not run
Rich Forman schrieb: I just tried upgrading from 2.2.3 to 2.2.7a on my PDC (2.2.17 kernel). The logon script that I have been using all along without any problems quits executing w/ 2.2.7a. I can manually map the netlogon share after logging in and manually run the script and everything work fine. No error messages have u checked, if the directory /usr/local/samba/netlogon has the 'x' (1) flag set in all hierachies. i had the same problema (as i posted before a view month's) - and that was the solution. The permissions on /usr/local/samba/netlogon/* are 777. sorry, - i did read your first mail again. seeme i was sleeping yesterday - u told, that u have access... u did upgrade? - maybe, the machine account went away? did u try to re-join a machine to the domain? Yes, I did upgrade w/ the tar file doing: ./configure make make install Afterwords, I booted my W2K client machine and logged on to the domain. The logon script doesn't run, but otherwise everything is fine. From the client, I can map drives manually, access files, etc. all without errors. It authenticates the user name and password throught the pdc and there aren't any error messages at all either in the server logs or the client event viewer. I put everything back w/ 'make revert' and all runs fine again w/ 2.2.3, including the logon script. I saw some previous posts on this subject, but the problem seemed to be using a %u variable in the name of the script. That isn't the case w/ me, the file is just logon.bat for everybody. Maybe one of these evenings I'll try again w/ log level 10 and try to diagnose w/ that. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] 2.2.7a logon script will not run
-Original Message- From: Kurt Weiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 11:29 PM To: Rich Forman Subject: Re: [Samba] 2.2.7a logon script will not run Rich Forman schrieb: I just tried upgrading from 2.2.3 to 2.2.7a on my PDC (2.2.17 kernel). The logon script that I have been using all along without any problems quits executing w/ 2.2.7a. I can manually map the netlogon share after logging in and manually run the script and everything work fine. No error messages have u checked, if the directory /usr/local/samba/netlogon has the 'x' (1) flag set in all hierachies. i had the same problema (as i posted before a view month's) - and that was the solution. The permissions on /usr/local/samba/netlogon/* are 777. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Compile problem (2.2.7a)
in /usr/src/samba-2.2.7a/source I typed the following command:
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc/samba
I get an error:
checking configure summary... configure: error: summary failure. Aborting
config
Last 20 lines of config.log:
configure:14091: checking whether struct passwd has pw_age
configure:14104:
gcc -c -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE
conftest.c 15
configure: In function `main':
configure:14100: structure has no member named `pw_age'
configure: failed program was:
#line 14097 configure
#include confdefs.h
#include pwd.h
int main() {
struct passwd p; p.pw_age;
; return 0; }
configure:14143: checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt
configure:14162: gcc -o
conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE
conftest.c -lpopt -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt 15
configure:14186: checking whether to use included popt
configure:14201: checking configure summary
configure:14210: gcc -o
conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE
conftest.c -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt -lpopt 15
configure: failed program was:
#line 14206 configure
#include confdefs.h
#include ./tests/summary.c
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Rich
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: samba and windows 2000 server
Thiruvarasu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help needed Currenly i'm running samba on a RedHat 7.3 system. The primary domain contreller in the network in a windows 2000 server machine. I'm using the windows 2000 server to authenticate my users in the domain. Each time a new user is created in windows 2000, i have to create the same user in linux inorder to allow the user to have access to the samba shares. Is the re a script or method that can automatically create users in linux as new users being created in windows 2000 ? Thanks -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba man smb.conf Have a look at the password server directive. It allows samba to get it's username/passwords from a remote server. Rich -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] 2.2.7a logon script will not run
I just tried upgrading from 2.2.3 to 2.2.7a on my PDC (2.2.17 kernel). The logon script that I have been using all along without any problems quits executing w/ 2.2.7a. I can manually map the netlogon share after logging in and manually run the script and everything work fine. No error messages appear in the log files. My smb.conf file is included. Don't know quite where to go with this one. Any suggestion would help. All client machines are NT4 or W2K. Thanks in advance. [global] #Server Parameters netbios name = SERVER server string = Samba %v #Domain Parameters workgroup = GRAY1 encrypt passwords = yes domain logons = yes os level = 65 preferred master = true domain master = true guest ok = yes domain admin group = @adm # domain admin users = rich andy add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -n -g machines -c NTMachine -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ time server = yes # Set to use local profiles logon script = scripts\logon.bat logon home = logon drive = logon path = # Name Server Support wins support = yes name resolve order = wins hosts lmhosts bcast # Security Options security = user bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = 192.168.100.1/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1 hosts allow = 192.168.100. # Debuggin Information log level = 1 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 50 debug timestamp = yes # Performance Tweaks getwd cache = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY dead time = 15 keep alive = 60 # lpq cache = 30 # Printing printer admin = root, rich, @adm printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes [homes] comment = Home Directories browsable = no writeable = yes read only = no #create mode = 0777 [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon browsable = no writeable = yes guest ok = no valid users = @users @adm @sec create mask = 777 directory mask = 777 inherit permissions = yes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] some doubts
Local accounts should work just fine. I have nsswitch.conf set up with 'compat winbind'. On Thursday 30 January 2003 01:19 pm, Igor Debacker wrote: Greetings from Brazil, 1) how can i login with the local accounts (root and others) while winbind is running ? i can only login with domain+user accounts !!! my /etc/nsswitch.conf is already configured to check files and winbind.. what else should i do ? 2) is there an way of my win2kserver users login only with their user name and not as DOMAIN+user ? Thanx in advance Igor Vieira Debacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Rich Smrcina Sr. Systems Engineer Sytek Services, A Division of DSG Milwaukee, WI [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Catch the WAVV! Stay for Requirements and the Free for All! Update your S/390 skills in 4 days for a very reasonable price. WAVV 2003 in Winston-Salem, NC. April 25-29, 2003 For details see http://www.wavv.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Compilation warning on 2.2.7a
It seems pretty typical that compilation warnings can be essentially ignored. Be that as it may, if I can't find evidence that a warning can be ignored in the archives, I am compelled to ask about it. A nod that these are OK or a fix for them if they are not OK would be appreciated. I am getting several warnings with winbind_nss.c : Compiling nsswitch/winbind_nss.c with -fPIC nsswitch/winbind_nss.c: In function `fill_pwent': nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:600: warning: passing arg 2 of `get_static' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:612: warning: passing arg 2 of `get_static' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:629: warning: passing arg 2 of `get_static' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:641: warning: passing arg 2 of `get_static' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:653: warning: passing arg 2 of `get_static' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c: In function `fill_grent': nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:690: warning: passing arg 2 of `get_static' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:702: warning: passing arg 2 of `get_static' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:728: warning: passing arg 2 of `get_static' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:753: warning: passing arg 2 of `get_static' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c: In function `_nss_winbind_getpwent_r': nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:870: warning: passing arg 4 of `fill_pwent' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c: In function `_nss_winbind_getpwuid_r': nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:920: warning: passing arg 4 of `fill_pwent' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:933: warning: passing arg 4 of `fill_pwent' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c: In function `_nss_winbind_getpwnam_r': nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:982: warning: passing arg 4 of `fill_pwent' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:995: warning: passing arg 4 of `fill_pwent' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c: In function `_nss_winbind_getgrent_r': nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:1119: warning: passing arg 5 of `fill_grent' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c: In function `_nss_winbind_getgrnam_r': nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:1179: warning: passing arg 5 of `fill_grent' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:1193: warning: passing arg 5 of `fill_grent' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c: In function `_nss_winbind_getgrgid_r': nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:1242: warning: passing arg 5 of `fill_grent' from incompatible pointer type nsswitch/winbind_nss.c:1256: warning: passing arg 5 of `fill_grent' from incompatible pointer type Linking nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so -- Rich Smrcina Sytek Services, Inc. Milwaukee, WI [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Catch the WAVV! Stay for Requirements and the Free for All! Update your S/390 skills in 4 days for a very reasonable price. WAVV 2003 in Winston-Salem, NC. April 25-29, 2003 For details see http://www.wavv.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] AutoCAD temp file error
I continue to have this problem w/ LDD and it occurred even before I switched from an NT server to Samba. I'm fairly certain it's an Autodesk problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:samba-admin;lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Brock Nanson Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 8:31 PM To: Jay Ts Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] AutoCAD temp file error Hi Jay, Brock Nanson wrote: I rather doubt this is a samba problem, but perhaps someone can offer a hint to solve the issue... It's very unlikely to be a Samba bug, but may very well be a Samba misconfiguration. Perhaps. But the config hasn't been touched in 2 years and the WinXX workstations have never had the problem. The win2k box fails, saying the file could not be found on the path (and dumps a listing of the paths checked). The path exists in the list, and the file has been written to the directory! When the user responds to the error and the command completes, the file is successfully deleted from the server. So, it is doing everything except finding and inserting the file (which is there!). Exactly what is the name of the file, and are you using any foreign languages in file names? If you are using anything other than English, be aware that support for internationalization in Samba 2.2 is a little complicated to set up, and may be the source of your problem. Even if your file names are in the American/English character set, there are differences between how Unix and Windows handle filenames. A common source of trouble is case sensitivity in filenames. There are parameters that can be set in the Samba configuration file (smb.conf) to help deal with this. The filename looks like this: $abc$de.dwg The letters aren't right (I can't recall them exactly right now), but the file does start with a '$' and has a second on part way through as shown. I think the key to this is hidden in the way I can 'seed' the directory with this file once and have the command work until a new drawing is opened after doing so. Note that the file is deleted as a matter of course and that the file is not there the second, third,... time the command is used and it will work. But I need the file there the first time!! The temp file on the server is being saved with rwxrw-rw- attributes, although all the other files are rw-rw-rw-. That is because Samba's default is 'map archive = yes'. When the archive bit is set on a file from MS-DOS/Windows, Samba will keep track of it using the owner's execute bit. It will look like an executable file to a Unix user. If you don't like this, then set map archive = no in smb.conf. After doing this, MS-DOS backup software may not work right, because it won't see any archive attributes set for files to incrementally back up. Yeah, can't do this as I do use a Windows based backup utility. Funny that this file is the only one saved with the execute bit toggled. The other files AutoCAD creates don't have the execute bit set. I had wondered briefly if the speed with which the file is saved, then requested could be a problem. In a word: no. In three words: I highly doubt it! That's actually four words, but I do agree ;-) Any guesses? Or even a confirmation that the problem is with Win2k and NOT the samba box? I certainly wouldn't guarantee it's not a Windows bug. ;-) If you haven't fixed the problem by now, try providing a little more information, specifically, the _exact_ name of a temporary file that is problematic -- didn't you think of including that in your question? :) I did think of it but as I'm writing these postings away from the system couldn't remember the exact file name. I'm not very familiar with win2k but found it strange that it differentiates between 'Nobody' and 'nobody'. That has me a little worried, but as I can use the work around described above, I don't think the 'N' vs. 'n' is a problem. I do think it is a win2k issue, but it is odd that the problem can't be recreated when using a local drive. Any other ideas?? Thanks, Brock -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Large file sizes.
Hello and thanks for your informative web site. I went searching through looking for information on MAX file sizes with Samba, unfortunately, I wasn't able to locate what info I needed after an hour or so of searching. What OUR issues are here are we have a NAS using WinNT that our Linux server is accessing. We have a need to COPY/MOVE/TAR a file from one server (NT) to another. What my goal is, is to backup requested data (Files in excess of 15GB) in TAR format to a given location on our NAS, building a TAR file throughout the day, then in the evening (Say 12AM) we would GZip the file down for further Archiving. What the issue is, is I can't work with files greater than 1.8GB, the File Sytem shows this is the size of the file, even if it is larger than 10GB. Since these are '/mnt' drives, I can't figure out if our problem is Linux, or Samba related. We are using RedHat 7.0 (I know that 7.2 is avaible) and it came with Samba 2.0.10. Would ALL of these issues be dealt with in the new version of RH 7.2?? Or will I still experience file size problems even if I reload the new OS? I have no issues with getting the Latest greatest versions of Samba RH Linux, but I need to be 100% sure that I don't have file size limitations in the GB range, I expect to be dealing with files in the 10-40GB range on a daily basis, we are a service bureau so our customers send us this kind of data every day. Can you please provide me an answer or two to these questions?? Thanks you ahead of time. -- Rich Parker http://www.fssi-ca.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] network browsing problems
I am having trouble making Windows XP machines a member of a Samba domain. The behavior is when the initial logon screen for XP comes up, it says that it must rebuild the domain list. This message stays for some time and the disappears. Then when the domain is selected it tells me that it cannot find the domain controller for the domain and that I cant logon to it. The architecture of the setup is a Samba 2.2.4 server built with smbmount, acl support and winbind acting as the domain controller. The master browser of the network is a Samba 2.0.9 server, which is acting as the WINS server for the 2.2.4 machine. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Richard Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Samba] PANIC: share_modes_identical
When 2.2.4 was released, I updated my cvs and did ./configure and make (no special options). Since I came in somewhat early today and nobody was around I did the make install. Everything ran fine until I tried to load a particular file and I'm receiving the following error and unable to open the file on a network share. If I place the file on a local drive it loads fine. Permissions and what not are identical to when I was running 2.2.3a. Any thoughts? TIA. smbd/service.c:make_connection(651) forman (192.168.100.14) connect to service cad as user rich (uid=506, gid=100) (pid 17884) smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(631) open_mode_check: exlusive oplock left by process 17884 after break ! For fileDRV/periscope/PScope15.arx, dev = 801, inode = 1193703. Deleting it to continue... smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(635) open_mode_check: Existent process 17884 left active oplock. locking/locking.c:share_modes_identical(560) PANIC: share_modes_identical: share_mode missmatch (e1 = 32, e2 = 32800). Logic error. lib/util.c:smb_panic(1092) PANIC: PANIC: share_modes_identical logic error. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] re: NIS and smbpasswd
I am creating a samba domain that will allow PC access to a small group of Sun servers running varying and some very old versions of SunOS. They are using NIS for users, groups and netgroups. They share files internally via NFS from a single share on a Linux server. I have setup samba to allow access local from their win9x,2000,XP workstations and therefore had to use encrypted passwords. Was wondering if anyone worked out any interesting password syncronization schemes with a similar configuration? Currently I am using some expect glue to make the smb password sync work and I'm working on a backend for yppasswdd but its getting sloppy. Any ideas would be appreciated... Thx, Rich Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
