[Samba] samba 3.6.0 compile error --enable-external-libtdb=yes (works for samba-3.5.11)
Hello I'm trying to compile samba-3.6.0 on a RHEL6 server (relevant options below): --with-libtalloc=no \ --enable-external-libtalloc=yes \ --with-libtdb=no --enable-external-libtdb=yes This does not work, I get an error Unable to find libtdb. However: libtdb-devel-1.2.1-3.el6.i686 libtdb-1.2.1-3.el6.i686 have been installed. This works fine when I try to build samba-3.5.11 on the same machine. What's has changed? I could find that in Fedora Rawhide they have disabled this option in the spec file but without specifying a reason: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.network.samba.internals/55452 Kind regards Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] samba-3.5.4: compilation fails on RHAS5U5
hello
I managed to compile:
I had to add some lines to the spec file:
--with-cifsumount \
/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/net.mo
%{_includedir}/wbc_async.h
%{_mandir}/man5/pam_winbind.conf.5*
werner
-Original Message-
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
Sent: vrijdag 3 september 2010 23:23
To: Werner Maes
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba-3.5.4: compilation fails on RHAS5U5
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Werner Maes
werner.m...@icts.kuleuven.be wrote:
thank you but apparently these rpms are not based on the spec file
given by samba for rhel (but on same spec file from suse).
e.g.: there is a rpm called samba-cifsmount which is not part of the
spec file.
my question remains: why does the spec file provided does not
compile?
kind regards
werner
It's confusing, I admit. The author of that RPM is compiling in his
personal build environment, not using mock, which apparently works
for him. I've sent him some updates for his .spec file to improve RHEL
compatibility, which he's incorporated, but it could use some
refinement.
The tarball .spec file is seriously out of date, which is why it
doesn't work. No one's pushed a more recent one into the source tree,
not even people like me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] samba-3.5.4: compilation fails on RHAS5U5
Hello The link you provided is completely outdated ! There are no new samba packages available there ! kind regards werner -Original Message- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 2 september 2010 23:50 To: Werner Maes Cc: sa...@samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] samba-3.5.4: compilation fails on RHAS5U5 Grab and review the RPM's from http://download.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/RedHat/. On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Werner Maes werner.m...@icts.kuleuven.be wrote: hello I tried to compile samba on Redhat AS5U5 but it fails with this message: Install: cannot stat `source3/bin/umount.cifs': No such file or directory. Any solution? kind regards werner maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] samba-3.5.4: compilation fails on RHAS5U5
thank you but apparently these rpms are not based on the spec file given by samba for rhel (but on same spec file from suse). e.g.: there is a rpm called samba-cifsmount which is not part of the spec file. my question remains: why does the spec file provided does not compile? kind regards werner -Original Message- From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 3 september 2010 14:46 To: Werner Maes Cc: sa...@samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] samba-3.5.4: compilation fails on RHAS5U5 On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Werner Maes werner.m...@icts.kuleuven.be wrote: Hello The link you provided is completely outdated ! There are no new samba packages available there ! kind regards werner Oh, sorry, there is a README.RHEL there at points to the new location. http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] samba-3.5.4: compilation fails on RHAS5U5
hello I tried to compile samba on Redhat AS5U5 but it fails with this message: Install: cannot stat `source3/bin/umount.cifs': No such file or directory. Any solution? kind regards werner maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] problem compiling samba-3.5.2 on RHEL 5.5
this is my output when I try to compile samba-3.5.2 using the spec file provided in the samba packages: Linking bin/smbclient /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `PC' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetflag' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetent' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `UP' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tputs' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgoto' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetnum' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `BC' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetstr' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [bin/smbclient] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14813 (%build) any ideas? werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Cannot compile RHEL rpms using samba 3.4.2 series source
Thanks for your effort, I' have a look on monday. Should we reopen this bug which has now status RESOLVED as a duplicate of bug 6742 but as we know now this is not the case ! kind regards werner Van: D.L. Meyer [dlme...@uiuc.edu] Verzonden: zaterdag 3 oktober 2009 0:51 Aan: Michael Wood; Werner Maes CC: samba@lists.samba.org; k...@sernet.de Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Cannot compile RHEL rpms using samba 3.4.2 series source I've applied the patch for #6742 to the 3.4.2 package, and it makes no difference to the RHEL issue. (#6742 was reported for debian systems...) I have been able to determine that the problem appears to be with the carry-forward of the precompiled headers. The 'make pch' step proceeds without error, but as the process starts the main 'make all' part, it acts like the precompiled headers are not used. To verify this, I modified the 'make all' call from: make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_GNU_SOURCE -j2 \ all modules pam_smbpass to: make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.2/source3 \ -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.2/source3/iniparser/src -Iinclude -I./include \ -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/talloc -I./../lib/tevent -I./../lib/tdb/include -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. \ -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.2/lib/tdb/include -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./../lib/popt \ -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.2/source3/lib -I.. -I../source4 -j2 \ all modules pam_smbpass (Basically, including the entire list of include directories specified on the command line in the 'make pch' section.) This allows the build to proceed -- apparently properly -- until a later problem stops the process at 'ldb_modules.c': it complains about 'MODULESDIR' being undefined in function 'ldb_try_load_dso'. A little research and another addition results in something that at least completes the build: make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.2/source3 \ -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.2/source3/iniparser/src -Iinclude -I./include \ -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/talloc -I./../lib/tevent -I./../lib/tdb/include -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. \ -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.2/lib/tdb/include -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./../lib/popt \ -I/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.2/source3/lib -I.. -I../source4 -DMODULESDIR=\'/usr/lib/samba\' -j2 \ all modules pam_smbpass I haven't tested the resulting packages yet, though. Hopefully, someone more versed in the use of precompiled headers can take a look here and see what might be wrong... -D --On Friday, October 02, 2009 2:44 PM +0200 Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/10/2 Werner Maes werner.m...@icts.kuleuven.be: [...] ps: or maybe the resolution only refers that it is a duplicate of bug 6742? Exactly. Did you try the patch attached to bug 6742? -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Cannot compile RHEL rpms using samba 3.4.2 series source
hello Although https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6721 has status RESOLVED, I still get an error when trying to compile samba-3.4.2 on RHEL5. The following command failed: gcc -O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c ../lib/replace/getpass.c -o ../lib/replace/getpass.o make: *** [../lib/replace/snprintf.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make: *** [../lib/talloc/talloc.o] Error 1 make: *** [../lib/replace/replace.o] Error 1 kind regards werner ps: or maybe the resolution only refers that it is a duplicate of bug 6742? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Cannot compile RHEL rpms using samba 3.4.2 series source
I applied the patch from Matt Kraai (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4728action=view) but it still does not compile !! The patch does not seem to work on RHEL5. Has anybody else tested this patch? werner -Original Message- From: Michael Wood [mailto:esiot...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 2 oktober 2009 14:44 To: Werner Maes Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; k...@sernet.de Subject: Re: [Samba] Cannot compile RHEL rpms using samba 3.4.2 series source 2009/10/2 Werner Maes werner.m...@icts.kuleuven.be: [...] ps: or maybe the resolution only refers that it is a duplicate of bug 6742? Exactly. Did you try the patch attached to bug 6742? -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4
does this this mean we have to wait for 3.4.2? or is it necessary to open a bug report? w. -Original Message- From: Eero Volotinen [mailto:eero.voloti...@iki.fi] Sent: donderdag 10 september 2009 18:03 To: Werner Maes Cc: 'Ralf Hornik Mailings'; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4 Werner Maes kirjoitti: no I haven't yet. perhaps I will try that tomorrow. but I'm wondering if I'm the only one with this error? No, looks like this problem comes also with my environment running Centos 5.3 32bit. (rhel 5 clone) I think that is bug in make rpms system. -- Eero -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4
thank you ! werner -Original Message- From: ee...@welho.com [mailto:ee...@welho.com] Sent: maandag 14 september 2009 14:32 To: Werner Maes Cc: 'Eero Volotinen'; 'Ralf Hornik Mailings' Subject: RE: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4 I just opened bug about this: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6721 Please add, if any comments or ideas. thanks -- Eero, RHCE -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4
well in the Makefile I see: CPPFLAGS=-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/talloc -I./../lib/tevent -I./../lib/tdb/include -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -I./../lib/popt -DLDAP_DEPRECATED so it seems that it should find replace.h can't figure out what's wrong her :( werner -Original Message- From: Michael Wood [mailto:esiot...@gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 10 september 2009 13:55 To: Werner Maes Subject: Re: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4 2009/9/10 Werner Maes werner.m...@icts.kuleuven.be: hello when I try to compile samba-3.4.x on RHEL4 with the samba.spec in the packaging folder I always get this error: Compiling ../lib/talloc/talloc.c ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:50:21: replace.h: No such file or directory Looks like a -I../lib/replace (or equivalent) is missing somewhere. ../lib/talloc/talloc.c: In function `_talloc_realloc': ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:987: error: `bool' undeclared (first use in this function) ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:987: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:987: error: for each function it appears in.) ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:987: error: syntax error before malloced ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:1035: error: `malloced' undeclared (first use in this function) ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:1035: error: `true' undeclared (first use in this function) ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:1486:1: warning: va_copy redefined This looks like HAVE_VA_COPY was not correctly defined. I think you should first figure out the replace.h issue before looking at the HAVE_VA_COPY issue, though. In file included from ../lib/talloc/talloc.h:30, from ../lib/talloc/talloc.c:51: /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.6/include/stdarg.h:54:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition The following command failed: ccache gcc -O2 -g -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -c ../lib/talloc/talloc.c -o ../lib/talloc/talloc.o make: *** [../lib/talloc/talloc.o] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.72692 (%build) -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4
replace.h is in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.1/lib/replace/ The Makefile can be found in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.1/source3/ so -I./../lib/replace should point to the folder where replace.h can be found? Or am I missing sometmhing? CPPFLAGS=-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/talloc -I./../lib/tevent -I./../lib/tdb/include -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -I./../lib/popt -DLDAP_DEPRECATED werner ps: in samba 3.2.x 3.3.x the folder lib/replace was situated in the source/ folder, but in samba 3.4.x it is no longer there but one directory up ! -Original Message- From: Ralf Hornik [mailto:r...@ralf-hornik.de] Sent: donderdag 10 september 2009 16:20 To: Werner Maes Cc: 'Michael Wood'; samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4 Werner Maes werner.m...@icts.kuleuven.be wrote: so it seems that it should find replace.h can't figure out what's wrong her :( So where is your replace.h located? Ralf -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4
no I haven't yet. perhaps I will try that tomorrow. but I'm wondering if I'm the only one with this error? w. -Original Message- From: Ralf Hornik Mailings [mailto:r...@best.homeunix.org] Sent: donderdag 10 september 2009 16:56 To: Werner Maes Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] compiling samba-3.4.x on RHEL4 Werner Maes werner.m...@icts.kuleuven.be wrote: replace.h is in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba-3.4.1/lib/replace/ The Makefile can be found in /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/samba- 3.4.1/source3/ so -I./../lib/replace should point to the folder where replace.h can be found? Or am I missing sometmhing? CPPFLAGS=-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/talloc -I./../lib/tevent -I./../lib/tdb/include -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -I./../lib/popt -DLDAP_DEPRECATED Have you already tried to compile by hand? (just for reproducing) -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] samba domain trust with Windows 2008 R0
Hello I'm trying to establish a trust between samba 3.0.26a windows 2008 R0 server (windows 2008 functional mode). Apparently it does not work. Only windows 2003 functional mode? net rpc trustdom establish gives [2007/09/26 13:48:06, 3] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_session_setup(961) SPNEGO login failed: No logon interdomain trust account [2007/09/26 13:48:06, 1] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_full_connection(1606) failed session setup with NT_STATUS_NOLOGON_INTERDOMAIN_TRUST_ACCOUNT Could not connect to server WINDOWS2008 [2007/09/26 13:48:06, 3] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_start_connection(1509) Connecting to host=WINDOWS2008 [2007/09/26 13:48:06, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(874) Connecting to 10.33.6.145 at port 445 [2007/09/26 13:48:06, 4] libsmb/clirap2.c:cli_get_pdc_name(1279) cli_get_pdc_name: machine WINDOWS2008 failed the NetServerEnum call. Error was : RAP code 2184. [2007/09/26 13:48:06, 0] utils/net_rpc.c:rpc_trustdom_establish(5673) NetServerEnum2 error: Couldn't find primary domain controller for domain PCLAB8 Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: idmap backend questions
for you information: because I use security=user, I don't have kerberos enabled on my samba server Hello I have some questions regarding the idmap backend. Does this only work when you've have joined your samba server to the AD domain (security = ADS)? I would like to map SID to uids/gids on a samba server that has a trust with an AD server. In my setup I have established a trust between samba and AD; they are both PDC's. smb.conf idmap domains = PCLABTEST idmap config PCLABTEST:backend = ad idmap config PCLABTEST:default = yes idmap config PCLABTEST:range = 100 - 30 idmap alloc backend = tdb idmap alloc config:range = 100 - 3 == /var/log/samba/winbindd.log [2007/09/21 09:56:31, 1] nsswitch/idmap_ad.c:ad_idmap_cached_connection_internal(115) ad_idmap_init: failed to connect to AD [2007/09/21 09:56:31, 1] nsswitch/idmap_ad.c:idmap_ad_sids_to_unixids(514) ADS uninitialized [2007/09/21 09:56:31, 2] nsswitch/idmap.c:idmap_backends_sids_to_unixids(1148) ERROR: NTSTATUS = 0xc001 ps: I have configured samba with these options included (--with-shared-modules=idmap_ad --with-ads) and have installed Identity management for Unix on the AD server. I have given a user a uid gid in AD. If I do an strace of the winbind proces, I can see both the uidNumer and gidNumber, both samba does not pick it up. uidNumber1\204\0\0\0\7\4\00510\204\0\0\0\30\4\tgidNumber1\204\0\0\0\7\4\00510\204\0\0\0%\4\2 Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] idmap backend questions
Hello I have some questions regarding the idmap backend. Does this only work when you've have joined your samba server to the AD domain (security = ADS)? I would like to map SID to uids/gids on a samba server that has a trust with an AD server. In my setup I have established a trust between samba and AD; they are both PDC's. smb.conf idmap domains = PCLABTEST idmap config PCLABTEST:backend = ad idmap config PCLABTEST:default = yes idmap config PCLABTEST:range = 100 - 30 idmap alloc backend = tdb idmap alloc config:range = 100 - 3 == /var/log/samba/winbindd.log [2007/09/21 09:56:31, 1] nsswitch/idmap_ad.c:ad_idmap_cached_connection_internal(115) ad_idmap_init: failed to connect to AD [2007/09/21 09:56:31, 1] nsswitch/idmap_ad.c:idmap_ad_sids_to_unixids(514) ADS uninitialized [2007/09/21 09:56:31, 2] nsswitch/idmap.c:idmap_backends_sids_to_unixids(1148) ERROR: NTSTATUS = 0xc001 ps: I have configured samba with these options included (--with-shared-modules=idmap_ad --with-ads) and have installed Identity management for Unix on the AD server. I have given a user a uid gid in AD. If I do an strace of the winbind proces, I can see both the uidNumer and gidNumber, both samba does not pick it up. uidNumber1\204\0\0\0\7\4\00510\204\0\0\0\30\4\tgidNumber1\204\0\0\0\7\4\00510\204\0\0\0%\4\2 Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba - ad domain trust windows 2003 native mode
Hello Is it possible to establish an interdomain trust between samba 3.0.25c and Windows 2003 Active Directory in Windows 2003 native mode? According to the howto Chapter 18, last phrase it is not: It works with Samba-3 and NT4 domains, and also with Samba-3 and Windows 200x ADS in mixed mode . But Volcker Lendecke replied on a mail in the samba mailing list: List: http://marc.info/?l=sambar=1w=2samba Subject:http://marc.info/?t=11818566309r=1w=2Re: [Samba] Local accounts and AD Date: http://marc.info/?l=sambar=1w=2b=2007062007-06-15 15:49:52 I can't establish a trust because AD is running in native mode. To establish a trust domain AD must be running in mixed mode. At least this is how I understand the problem. That's a wrong assumption. You can certainly use a trust in native mode. The only thing you can not do anymore is install an NT4 BDC into the domain that was converted to native. So my question: what's the story on this? As for now I cannot make the trust work (samba as the trusting domain). Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Using Samba: Third Edition
Hello When will this book arrive online? http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/toc.htmlUsing Samba, 2ed, O'Reilly Associates (Feb. 2003). (Jan 2007: The 3rd edition has been released and will be available online soon). kind regards werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] net rpc trustdom list: enumerates all accounts
Hello When I perform the net rpc trustdom list command I get the couldn't enumerate accounts error. I use LDAP as passdb backend with approximately 3 accounts. If I run the command, I can see from my LDAP logs that it tries to list every account on the LDAP server. Therefore the net rpc trustdom list command times out. Is this normal behaviour? Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] net rpc trustdom list Password: Trusted domains list: none Trusting domains list: [2007/05/07 09:45:53, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(438) cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was Call timed out: server did not respond after 1 milliseconds [2007/05/07 09:45:53, 0] utils/net_rpc.c:rpc_trustdom_list(5445) Couldn't enumerate accounts. Error was: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unable to follow dfs referral - still a problem for smbclient also freebsd smbfs
At 19:35 8/03/2007, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 09:43:39AM +0100, werner maes wrote: At 20:46 7/03/2007, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:56:56PM +0100, werner maes wrote: hello I'm also interested to know whether this patch has made it to smbclient. I've just merged this from SAMBA_3_0 to SAMBA_3_0_25 and in simple testing it works following the DFS referral. I can't fix the *BSD smbfs of course, but smbclient should now work in these cases. Jeremy. tnank you I'll try it out as soon as 3.0.25 is available. has this patch made it into 3.0.25rc1? No, I'm actually re-working the smbclient dfs code right now (making sure it works with posix pathnames etc.). I should be checking something in this week, so it'll be in 3.0.25pre2, not pre1. Jeremy. hello at first sight the dfs referrals now seem to work! I'll do some more testing. thanks very much werner maes Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Unable to follow dfs referral - still a problem for smbclient also freebsd smbfs
At 20:46 7/03/2007, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:56:56PM +0100, werner maes wrote: hello I'm also interested to know whether this patch has made it to smbclient. I've just merged this from SAMBA_3_0 to SAMBA_3_0_25 and in simple testing it works following the DFS referral. I can't fix the *BSD smbfs of course, but smbclient should now work in these cases. Jeremy. tnank you I'll try it out as soon as 3.0.25 is available. has this patch made it into 3.0.25rc1? werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Unable to follow dfs referral - still a problem for smbclient also freebsd smbfs
hello I'm also interested to know whether this patch has made it to smbclient. Hi, Does anyone know if there has been any more progress on the problem of browsing 'complex dfs roots' see http://lists.samba.org/archive/smb-clients/2006-February/000622.html Basically it occurs whenever you have a Microsoft Distributed File System Tree where the links are to subfolders of the destination share. Microsoft clients have no trouble browsing such trees. The Samba HOWTO only gives an example of the basic case where the link happens to be directly to the 'share folder' of the destination i.e root# cd /export/dfsroot root# ln -s msdfs:storageA\\shareA linka in smb.conf... [global] netbios name = GANDALF host msdfs = yes [dfs] path = /export/dfsroot msdfs root = yes --- But if you try instead: root# ln -s msdfs:storageA\\shareA\mydata linka Then if you mount \\GANDALF\dfs using smbfs - you can't get into the linka folder. Using smbclient - when you try to cd to that folder you'd get a delay and then: Connection to storageA\shareA failed Unable to follow dfs referral [//storageA\shareA/mydata] cd \linka\: NT_STATUS_PATH_NOT_COVERED As indicated above - in a windows explorer you can browse to and beyond this DFS referral point. I see there was an attempt at patching this a while back - but it may not have been a complete solution and never seems to have made it into samba. http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2006-April/046454.html It seems to me that FreeBSD is pretty crippled as a client for samba networks because of this.. you just can't mount or browse such a network properly. (These sorts of trees can't be that uncommon.. what are people using for this... sharity??) Maybe Linux can do it with it's mount.cifs capability.. Has anyone tried it? Cheers, Julian Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbclient dfs-aware? part 2: getting pas dfs junction point?
update: I found some people with the same problem as me: http://www.cs.washington.edu/lab/sw/uwcsesamba.html Smbclient is not Dfs-aware. This means you can specify \\ntdfs\cs as a share, but when you attempt to drill down past the so-called Dfs junction points you will not get anywhere. In the following example this is illustrated. You cannot get to //ntdfs/cs/cse/www using smbclient. % smbclient //ntdfs/cs Password: Domain=[CSERESEARCH] OS=[Windows Server 2003 3790] Server=[Windows Server 2003 5.2] smb: \ ls . D0 Thu Oct 16 16:17:54 2003 .. D0 Thu Oct 16 16:17:54 2003 cse D0 Thu Oct 28 10:25:56 2004 nt D0 Wed Feb 25 15:28:09 2004 34522 blocks of size 1048576. 29260 blocks available smb: \ cd cse smb: \cse\ ls . D0 Thu Oct 28 10:25:56 2004 .. D0 Thu Oct 28 10:25:56 2004 www D0 Thu Oct 28 10:25:56 2004 www2D0 Thu Oct 16 16:16:58 2003 34522 blocks of size 1048576. 29260 blocks available smb: \cse\ cd www smb: \cse\www\ ls NT_STATUS_PATH_NOT_COVERED listing \cse\www\\* 34522 blocks of size 1048576. 29260 blocks available smb: \cse\www\ q hello a quick question: is the smbclient program a dfs-aware client? can it access dfs points on a microsoft dfs server? kind regards werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] smbclient dfs-aware?
hello a quick question: is the smbclient program a dfs-aware client? can it access dfs points on a microsoft dfs server? kind regards werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] smbclient dfs-aware?
in fact dfs links work with version 3.0.23d. but in fact I was testing with a DFS stand alone namespace (that's what MS calls it). This is not a DFS link. And this does not work. However I can access the namespace with my XP client. so I have \\server\dfsnamespace\dfslink. I can access the dfslink with smbclient but not the namespace. If I use the Windows Explorer in XP I can access both. werner At 15:53 1/02/2007, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 werner maes wrote: hello a quick question: is the smbclient program a dfs-aware client? can it access dfs points on a microsoft dfs server? Yes. I don't remember which version it was added in through. Check the release notes. And theres one or two outstanding bugs at the moment. cheers, jerry = Samba--- http://www.samba.org Centeris --- http://www.centeris.com What man is a man who does not make the world better? --Balian -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFwf72IR7qMdg1EfYRAtb4AKDx2j933RNfyAKC+t0xt2OLCROYYQCg1nbL d1DywzAvvyBAP/TfsVZ1FIs= =sSNL -END PGP SIGNATURE- Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] sharing word files
hello I'm having the following problem: On a share I have a user with read-only access to word files. Another user has read-write access to these files. When the user with read-only access opens a word file and then the user with read-write access to these files opens the file, the read-write user has only read-only access. If the read-write user opens the word file first, then he has read-write access. My question: Why doesn't a user with read-write access always has these permissions? werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] glibc detected - invalid next size
hello does anybody know what this error means glibc detected *** (free): invalid next size (normal) : 0x08486b78 *** it occurs when I copy a whole list of files to a client werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] windows XP media center 2005
hello apparently it is possible to patch XP Media Center Edition 2005 to join a domain, but I can't seem to find out how. does anybody know which registry patch you need? kind regards werner quoteWhen Microsoft released Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005, the ability to join domains was left out. The domain feature was eliminated because of pricing reasons as well as technical reasons. MCE 2005 relies on fast user switching to allow it's extender devices to connect to the central MCE workstation. If the MCE workstation is on a domain, fast user switching will not work, and any extender devices will not work. If you do not use any extender devices, such as the set top boxes that allow you to watch Media Center content on your TV in your family room from your PC in your office, and you have a need to join a domain, it is now possible to make MCE 2005 join a domain. /quote Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: windows XP media center 2005
update: I found a patch 01 - Insert Windows XP CD. 02 - Start Run X:\i386\winnt32.exe /cmdcons 03 - (replace X: with the appropiate drive letter) 04 - Acknowledge prompt by clicking 'Yes'. 05 - Skip updating process by clicking 'Cancel' or by pressing 'Esc' 06 - After installation, acknowledge success msg. by clicking 'Ok' 07 - Start Shutdown Restart 08 - At boot menu, select 'Microsoft Windows Recovery Console' 09 - Select proper installation to log onto (default: 1) and press 'Enter' 10 - (If prompted, enter Administrator password and press 'Enter') 11 - Type (without quotes) and press enter: 'cd system32\config' 12 - Type (without quotes) and press enter: 'copy SYSTEM C:\' 13 - Type (without quotes) and press enter: exit 14 - At boot menu, select 'Windows XP Media Center Edition' 15 - Start Run Type: 'regedit' and press enter 16 - Click on 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE'. 17 - File Load Hive... 18 - Browse and select C:\SYSTEM 19 - Specify key name 'BANANA' and click OK 20 - Expand: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE BANANA WPA MedCtrUpg 21 - On the right-hand side, double-click IsLegacyMCE value 22 - Change selected value to 1 and click Ok. (THAT IS NOT AN L!) 23 - Click on BANANA subkey (under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE). 24 - File Unload Hive. Confirm. 25 - Start Shutdown Restart 26 - At boot menu, select 'Microsoft Windows Recovery Console' 27 - Select proper installation to log onto (default: 1) and press 'Enter' 28 - (If prompted, enter Administrator password and press 'Enter') 29 - Type (without quotes) and press enter: 'cd \' 30 - Type (without quotes) and press enter: 'copy SYSTEM C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\SYSTEM' 31 - (Yes, you want to overwrite - Go ahead and do it) 32 - Type (without quotes) and press enter: 'del SYSTEM' 33 - Type (without quotes) and press enter: 'exit' 34 - At boot menu, select 'Windows XP Media Center Edition' 35 - Join domain. hello apparently it is possible to patch XP Media Center Edition 2005 to join a domain, but I can't seem to find out how. does anybody know which registry patch you need? kind regards werner quoteWhen Microsoft released Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005, the ability to join domains was left out. The domain feature was eliminated because of pricing reasons as well as technical reasons. MCE 2005 relies on fast user switching to allow it's extender devices to connect to the central MCE workstation. If the MCE workstation is on a domain, fast user switching will not work, and any extender devices will not work. If you do not use any extender devices, such as the set top boxes that allow you to watch Media Center content on your TV in your family room from your PC in your office, and you have a need to join a domain, it is now possible to make MCE 2005 join a domain. /quote Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Unicode::MapUTF8
hello when I try to install samba 3.0.23b I get this error error: Failed dependencies: perl(Unicode::MapUTF8) is needed by samba-3.0.23b-1 is this perl module required since 3.0.23b? and why? can you use 3.0.23b without it? werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] dfs shadow copy services
hello configuration: windows XP client linux/samba dfs link to a share on a Netapp box. from the XP client you can't see the tab Previous Versions if you rightclick on a file. You can see this tab if you go directly to the Netapp share or if you use a dfs link on a Windows 2003 Server. Netapp is a Shadow Copy Services Provider but apparently the linux dfs cannot handle this. any ideas? werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] POLL: Does anyone actually use multiple passdb backends on the same server?
hello the passdb backend no longer accepts multiple backends in a chaining configuration since samba 3.0.23a . question: will the following confi still work? passdb backend = ldapsam://ldapserver1 ldapsam://ldapserver2 ? the idea is to use 2 ldap servers werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] POLL: Does anyone actually use multiple passdb backends on the same server?
At 14:33 8/08/2006, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 werner maes wrote: hello the passdb backend no longer accepts multiple backends in a chaining configuration since samba 3.0.23a . question: will the following confi still work? passdb backend = ldapsam://ldapserver1 ldapsam://ldapserver2 ? the idea is to use 2 ldap servers The syntax is passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap//ldapserver1 ldap://ldapserver2; There's a regression in 3.0.23a that breaks the . It has been fixed in 3.0.23b (which will be available in the next few hours). thank you for the information. anyway I still find it regrettable that multiple backends are no longer possible since we have our users stored in LDAP and the machine-accounts on the local PDC. a colleague of mine has some serious issues with 3.0.23a, that's why I'm no upgrading yet. just for information this is what he sees in his logs: dumping core in /usr/local/samba/var/cores/smbd [2006/08/08 14:16:37, 0] passdb/pdb_get_set.c:pdb_get_group_sid(164) pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account for s0163566 [2006/08/08 14:16:37, 0] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(194) Security context stack overflow! [2006/08/08 14:16:37, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1592) PANIC (pid 27484): Security context stack overflow! [2006/08/08 14:16:37, 0] lib/util.c:log_stack_trace(1699) BACKTRACE: 64 stack frames: #0 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(log_stack_trace+0x22) [0x82128c6] #1 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x6f) [0x8212766] #2 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(push_sec_ctx+0x6b) [0x80d49ce] Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] POLL: Does anyone actually use multiple passdb backends on the same server?
At 16:39 8/08/2006, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 werner, anyway I still find it regrettable that multiple backends are no longer possible since we have our users stored in LDAP and the machine-accounts on the local PDC. No offense, but it's too late to bring that up now. 3.0.23 was in development for 6 months. The original thread on this was back in February: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11395259651r=1w=2 This is a systemic problem with this list. No one seems to pay any attention until the release is done and over. off course you're right. but I don't think that one man could change this evolution. to be honest, I've read it but forgot to reply a colleague of mine has some serious issues with 3.0.23a, that's why I'm no upgrading yet. just for information this is what he sees in his logs: dumping core in /usr/local/samba/var/cores/smbd [2006/08/08 14:16:37, 0] passdb/pdb_get_set.c:pdb_get_group_sid(164) pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account for s0163566 [2006/08/08 14:16:37, 0] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(194) Security context stack overflow! [2006/08/08 14:16:37, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1592) PANIC (pid 27484): Security context stack overflow! [2006/08/08 14:16:37, 0] lib/util.c:log_stack_trace(1699) BACKTRACE: 64 stack frames: #0 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(log_stack_trace+0x22) [0x82128c6] #1 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(smb_panic+0x6f) [0x8212766] #2 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(push_sec_ctx+0x6b) [0x80d49ce] Is there a bug report on this ? It won't get fixed if we don't know about it. And since 3.0.23b has just been released, it may not be fixed in that either. No, it has not been fixed in 3.0.23b. there is no bug report as far as I know. he downgraded his server (since it was a production server) to an earlier version of samba. werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Problem joining Netapp server to samba domain
hello I would like to join a Netapp fileserver to a Samba domain that uses an external Openldap server for authentication. Here's what I do and where it goes wrong (I've hidden the real ip addresses). I've also created a machine account for the Netapp server on the PDC.: What is the name of the Windows NT 4 domain? [WORKGROUP]: PCKLAS CIFS - Starting SMB protocol... Wed Jul 5 17:08:47 CEST [filertop: nbt.nbss.socketError:error]: NBT: Cannot connect to server x.y.v.w over NBSS socket for port 139. Error 0xd: Permission denied. *** CIFS Setup could not establish a connection with the Primary Domain *** Controller (PDC). Usually this happens when the 'FILERTOP' account *** does not exist in the domain or must have it's password reset. Once you have created and/or reset the 'FILERTOP' machine account, press ENTER. [continue]:Wed Jul 5 17:08:47 CEST [filertop: nbt.nbss.socketError:error]: NBT: Cannot connect to server x.y.v.w over NBSS socket for port 139. Error 0xd: Permission denied. Wed Jul 5 17:08:51 CEST [filertop: nbt.nbns.registrationComplete:info]: NBT: All CIFS name registrations have completed for the local server. This is what I see using tcpdump: tcpdump: listening on eth0 17:30:10.580318 10.2.18.210.netbios-dgm pdc.kuleuven.ac.be.netbios-dgm: [udp sum ok] NBT UDP PACKET(138) Res=0x100A ID=0x7401 IP=10 (0xa).2 (0x2).18 (0x12).210 (0xd2) Port=138 (0x8a) Length=216 (0xd8) Res2=0x0 SourceName=FILERTOPNameType=0x00 (Workstation) DestName=PCKLAS NameType=0x1C (Unknown) SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST) SMB Command = 0x25 Error class = 0x0 Error code= 0 (0x0) Flags1= 0x0 Flags2= 0x0 Tree ID = 0 (0x0) Proc ID = 0 (0x0) UID = 0 (0x0) MID = 0 (0x0) Word Count= 17 (0x11) TotParamCnt=0 (0x0) TotDataCnt=42 (0x2a) MaxParmCnt=0 (0x0) MaxDataCnt=0 (0x0) MaxSCnt=39942 (0x9c06) TransFlags=0xAFF Res1=0x0 Res2=0x0 Res3=0x0 ParamCnt=0 (0x0) ParamOff=92 (0x5c) DataCnt=42 (0x2a) DataOff=92 (0x5c) SUCnt=3 (0x3) Data: (6 bytes) [000] 01 00 00 00 02 00 \001\000\000\000\002\000 Name=\MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON Data Data: (42 bytes) [000] 00 00 46 49 4C 45 52 54 4F 50 00 24 00 5C 4D 41 \000\000FILERT OP\000$\000\MA [010] 49 4C 53 4C 4F 54 5C 54 45 4D 50 5C 4E 45 54 4C ILSLOT\T EMP\NETL [020] 4F 47 4F 4E 00 01 01 00 FF FF OGON\000\001\001\000 \377\377 (ttl 63, id 60416, len 244) 17:30:10.580499 pdc.kuleuven.ac.be.netbios-dgm 10.2.18.210.netbios-dgm: [udp sum ok] NBT UDP PACKET(138) Res=0x100A ID=0x6BEE IP=x (0x86).y (0x3a).v (0xd9).w (0xf5) Port=138 (0x8a) Length=177 (0xb1) Res2=0x0 SourceName=PDC NameType=0x00 (Workstation) DestName=FILERTOPNameType=0x00 (Workstation) SMB PACKET: SMBtrans (REQUEST) SMB Command = 0x25 Error class = 0x0 Error code= 0 (0x0) Flags1= 0x0 Flags2= 0x0 Tree ID = 0 (0x0) Proc ID = 0 (0x0) UID = 0 (0x0) MID = 0 (0x0) Word Count= 17 (0x11) TotParamCnt=0 (0x0) TotDataCnt=16 (0x10) MaxParmCnt=0 (0x0) MaxDataCnt=0 (0x0) MaxSCnt=0 (0x0) TransFlags=0x0 Res1=0x0 Res2=0x0 Res3=0x0 ParamCnt=0 (0x0) ParamOff=0 (0x0) DataCnt=16 (0x10) DataOff=93 (0x5d) SUCnt=3 (0x3) Data: (6 bytes) [000] 01 00 01 00 02 00 \001\000\001\000\002\000 Name=\MAILSLOT\TEMP\NETLOGON Data Data: (16 bytes) [000] 06 00 5C 5C 4C 49 4E 53 41 4D 2D 31 35 00 FF FF \006\000\\PDC\000\377\377 (DF) (ttl 64, id 20051, len 219) Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Rejecting auth request
hello I often see these error messages in my logfiles log.cc33a02: _net_sam_logon: creds_server_step failed. Rejecting auth request from client CC33A02 machine account CC33A02$ I use samba 3.0.22 What's wrong? Any ideas? werner maes Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] secure channel ntlmssp in 3.0.21b
hello Apparently something seems to be changed since 3.0.20b. I have two servers: one domain PDC and one domain member server On both servers I had set server schannel = No client schannel = No I installed 3.0.21b and I could no longer make connections to shares defined on the domain member server When I tried to add another server to the domain I got this error [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# net rpc join -S domPDC -U root Password: [2006/02/01 12:27:06, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel(2641) cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel: failed to get schannel session key from server yy for domain xx [2006/02/01 12:27:06, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_ok(61) Error connecting to NETLOGON pipe. Error was NT_STATUS_INVALID_NETWORK_RESPONSE Unable to join domain xxx. [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# After uncommenting the options server schannel client schannel on both servers, it worked fine [EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# net rpc join -S domPDC -U root Password: Joined domain xx. == the secret keys appeart in /etc/samba/schannel_store.tdb So something is still not ok in libsmb/ntlmssp.c ?? kind regards werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] bug in 3.0.21a?
hello when I try to connect to a share from my windows xp client, it does not work. In linux via smbclient, there's no problem. see below for the error log version = 3.0.21a security = server (the problem only seems to occur on servers that rely on another samba server for authentication). any ideas? werner [2006/01/27 09:30:32, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(307) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [werner] - [werner] - [werner] succeeded [2006/01/27 09:30:32, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp_sign.c:ntlmssp_sign_init(332) NTLMSSP Sign/Seal - Initialising with flags: [2006/01/27 09:30:32, 3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:debug_ntlmssp_flags(63) Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0x600082b5 [2006/01/27 09:30:32, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36) === [2006/01/27 09:30:32, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 3023 (3.0.21a) Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba3-HOWTO [2006/01/27 09:30:32, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(39) From: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba3-HOWTO.pdf [2006/01/27 09:30:32, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) === [2006/01/27 09:30:32, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1554) PANIC: internal error [2006/01/27 09:30:32, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1562) BACKTRACE: 15 stack frames: #0 smbd(smb_panic2+0x8c) [0xea6d7c] #1 smbd(smb_panic+0x1a) [0xea6faa] #2 smbd [0xe91167] #3 /lib/tls/libc.so.6 [0x2488c8] #4 smbd(ntlmssp_sign_init+0xe5) [0xda7ca5] #5 smbd [0xda5080] #6 smbd(ntlmssp_update+0x296) [0xda40f6] #7 smbd(auth_ntlmssp_update+0x48) [0xeebc78] #8 smbd(reply_sesssetup_and_X+0x777) [0xd3d5d7] #9 smbd [0xd6b6b7] #10 smbd(process_smb+0x19e) [0xd6baee] #11 smbd(smbd_process+0x159) [0xd6cae9] #12 smbd(main+0x945) [0xf2b845] #13 /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xd3) [0x235e23] #14 smbd [0xd00cf1] Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: The single WINS problem: question (Michael Gasch)
Message: 14 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:34:38 +0100 From: Michael Gasch [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Samba] The single WINS problem: question To: werner maes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed do you have multiple subnets for each BDC? greez no, the BDC is on the same subnet Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: The single WINS problem: question
On Monday 12 December 2005 02:02, werner maes wrote: hello I've been reading the thread (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11328637691r=1w=2) and I have the same limitation with WINS in a PDC/BDC. That's why I have the following (experimental) setup: PDC == wins support = yes, passdb backend: master ldap BDC == wins support = yes, passdb backend: slave ldap I configured some of my XP clients to use both WINS servers and it seems to work. Well, you CAN do this, but then it is necessary to use the remote browse sync and remote announce parameters on both systems to gain cross-subnet browsing and name resolution capability. You will likely find that Windows hosts will register with only one WINS server - that is one of the key reasons for the advice that is in the man page and in the HOWTO book. but in the manual of smb.conf I read: wins support (G) Note that you should NEVER set this to yes on more than one machine in your network. What could happen if you use more than one WINS server on your network? You COULD (likely will) have broken NetBIOS name resolution, with the result that windows clients can panic and blue-screen. - John T. thanks for your advice john. I will setup a few XP clients with two WINS servers configured and see what happens. but I need this kind of backup because else I can't see the point of setting up a BDC if the WINS server remains the single point of failure. I'm looking forward to Samba4 where WINS replication support is nearly finished as I've read on the website (http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/slides/tridge_sambaxp05.pdf) kind regards werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] The single WINS problem: question
On Monday 12 December 2005 02:02, werner maes wrote: hello I've been reading the thread (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11328637691r=1w=2) and I have the same limitation with WINS in a PDC/BDC. That's why I have the following (experimental) setup: PDC == wins support = yes, passdb backend: master ldap BDC == wins support = yes, passdb backend: slave ldap I configured some of my XP clients to use both WINS servers and it seems to work. Well, you CAN do this, but then it is necessary to use the remote browse sync and remote announce parameters on both systems to gain cross-subnet browsing and name resolution capability. You will likely find that Windows hosts will register with only one WINS server - that is one of the key reasons for the advice that is in the man page and in the HOWTO book. but in the manual of smb.conf I read: wins support (G) Note that you should NEVER set this to yes on more than one machine in your network. What could happen if you use more than one WINS server on your network? You COULD (likely will) have broken NetBIOS name resolution, with the result that windows clients can panic and blue-screen. - John T. sorry for the repost, hope it appears in the right thread now... thanks for your advice john. I will setup a few XP clients with two WINS servers configured and see what happens. but I need this kind of backup because else I can't see the point of setting up a BDC if the WINS server remains the single point of failure. I'm looking forward to Samba4 where WINS replication support is nearly finished as I've read on the website (http://us4.samba.org/samba/ftp/slides/tridge_sambaxp05.pdf) kind regards werner Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] The single WINS problem: question
hello I've been reading the thread (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11328637691r=1w=2) and I have the same limitation with WINS in a PDC/BDC. That's why I have the following (experimental) setup: PDC == wins support = yes, passdb backend: master ldap BDC == wins support = yes, passdb backend: slave ldap I configured some of my XP clients to use both WINS servers and it seems to work. but in the manual of smb.conf I read: wins support (G) Note that you should NEVER set this to yes on more than one machine in your network. What could happen if you use more than one WINS server on your network? thanks werner maes Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] The single WINS problem: question
hello I've been reading the thread (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11328637691r=1w=2) and I have the same limitation with WINS in a PDC/BDC. That's why I have the following (experimental) setup: PDC == wins support = yes, passdb backend: master ldap BDC == wins support = yes, passdb backend: slave ldap I configured some of my XP clients to use both WINS servers and it seems to work. but in the manual of smb.conf I read: wins support (G) Note that you should NEVER set this to yes on more than one machine in your network. What could happen if you use more than one WINS server on your network? thanks werner maes Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] interdomain trust between windows 2003 server and samba
hello Is it possible to establish a trust between an windows 2003 server and samba 3.0.14a PDC? Samba as the trusted domain, windows 2003 as the trusting domain. werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] BUG: Vfs audit module samba 3.0.4 == share unaccessible
Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did work fine in samba-3.0.2a. I did not test samba-3.0.3 The share is no longer accessible !!! [BKHI-CC3] path = /home/BKHI-CC3 valid users = @BKHI-CC3-R, @BKHI-CC3-W write list = @BKHI-CC3-W force group = +BKHI-CC3-W create mask = 0664 directory mask = 02775 vfs objects = audit logfile: May 11 09:31:39 smbd[14267]: smbd_vfs_init: vfs_init_custom failed for audit May 11 09:31:39 smbd[14267]: vfs_init failed for service BKHI-CC3 if I uncomment vfs objects = audit, then I can access the share without any problems. Can someone take a look at this? It's probably in vfs.c Thanks Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] BUG: Vfs audit module samba 3.0.4 == share unacces sible
In my case it DOES NOT ! I tried both options I still get : tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME and in my logs May 11 16:25:28 smbd[15796]: [2004/05/11 16:25:28, 0] smbd/vfs.c:smbd_vfs_init(319) May 11 16:25:28 smbd[15796]: smbd_vfs_init: vfs_init_custom failed for audit May 11 16:25:28 smbd[15796]: [2004/05/11 16:25:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(502) May 11 16:25:28 smbd[15796]: vfs_init failed for service PCSHOP-CC3 Werner At 15:50 11/05/2004, Rauno Tuul wrote: add to each share writeable = yes or read-only = no This Helps! Rauno -Original Message- From: werner maes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11. mai 2004. a. 16:19 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] BUG: Vfs audit module samba 3.0.4 == share unaccessible Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did work fine in samba-3.0.2a. I did not test samba-3.0.3 The share is no longer accessible !!! [BKHI-CC3] path = /home/BKHI-CC3 valid users = @BKHI-CC3-R, @BKHI-CC3-W write list = @BKHI-CC3-W force group = +BKHI-CC3-W create mask = 0664 directory mask = 02775 vfs objects = audit logfile: May 11 09:31:39 smbd[14267]: smbd_vfs_init: vfs_init_custom failed for audit May 11 09:31:39 smbd[14267]: vfs_init failed for service BKHI-CC3 if I uncomment vfs objects = audit, then I can access the share without any problems. Can someone take a look at this? It's probably in vfs.c Thanks Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Windows 2003 domain logon
Hello Is it possible to do a domain logon in Samba with a Windows 2003 Server? I don't think so but perhaps someone has a solution. Kind regards Werner Maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba3 errors and question
Hello I find some errors in my logs and have some questions about them: 1. Why are logfiles created based on machinename and on ipaddress? Only based on machinename has been configured in smb.conf These messages occur in the logfiles bases on ipaddress (e.g.: log.10.10.10.1) [2004/03/15 14:05:06, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(591) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. 2. Why do these messages occur in /var/log/messages? And there's no problem with our network, no dodgy switches or so. Mar 15 13:28:34 smbd[11526]: [2004/03/15 13:28:34, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(952) Mar 15 13:28:34 smbd[11526]: getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected Somebody said that this is related to iptables running. If you stop iptables these messages no longer occur. Any ideas? -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] adding computer in domain with user other than root
Hello I tried to add a computer to a Samba domain using another account (testuser) than root. I use LDAP for authentication and added the account (testuser) with uid=0 in ldap. If I use this account to add an computer to the domain I get the error: Access is denied. And in the samba log: [2003/10/31 14:49:57, 0] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(260) decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (-1763543070). I know from previous posts that it's necessary to have an uid=0. But are there any other requirements. I also added this testuser to the domain admin group directive in samba. I use samba 2.2.8a. Thanks Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] adding computer in domain with user other than root
I'm glad it works for you :-) can you give some configuration details of smb.conf? I have: domain admin group = root ldaptest. Werner At 11:27 31/10/2003, Jean-Rene Cormier wrote: I just reformatted a computer and I joined it with my regular username which doesn't have uid=0 and is not mapped to root either. I thought that maybe it was because the machine account was already in LDAP so I booted up another Windows in VMWare and removed it from the domain and changed the computer name to one that wasn't already in LDAP and I was able to join it with the same username. I'm using the domain admin group and it seems to be working fine. Running on Samba 2.2.8a btw. Jean-Rene Cormier On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 10:37, Thiago Lima wrote: The user MUST be root, if you want to use another user map it to root in smbusers. regards. thiago. I tried to add a computer to a Samba domain using another account (testuser) than root. I use LDAP for authentication and added the account (testuser) with uid=0 in ldap. If I use this account to add an computer to the domain I get the error: Access is denied. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0.0 LDAP: multiple domains logon
Hello, If you use samba 3.0.0 with LDAP authentication, samba uses an ldap attribute sambaSID in which the domain SID is stored. When somebody does a domain logon (2000/XP) this attribute is checked. But suppose I would like to login to another domain? Can I define multiples sambaSID's or is this attribute unique? If it's unique, how can I login to multiple domains? Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.0 LDAP: multiple domains logon
At 10:44 1/10/2003, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 werner maes wrote: | | Hello, | | If you use samba 3.0.0 with LDAP authentication, samba uses an ldap | attribute sambaSID in which the domain SID is stored. When somebody | does a domain logon (2000/XP) this attribute is checked. But suppose I | would like to login to another domain? Can I define multiples sambaSID's | or is this attribute unique? If it's unique, how can I login to multiple | domains? You can't. This was one of the drawbacks of moving to SID's as opposed to RID's. However, you can setup truated Samba domains thus grouping users but still being able to logon to clients in other domains. What do you mean by truated Samba domains? Could you explain some more? Thanks, Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Swat problem with samba-3.0.0 RC1
Hello, I tried to configure a share with samba-3.0.0RC1 but after specifying the share name and after I clicked create, nothing happens. Only the header share parameters is shown. I've searched the list archives and a certain Chee Wai Yeung reported exactly the same problem with samba3.0.0beta1 on 09/06/2003 Will this bug be fixed before the final release? Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Ghost Create account: procedure number out ofrange inSamba
Sorry to bother you again but in my situation with LDAP authentication it doesn't seem to work. I'll explain the configuration in detail. I have a Samba 2.2.8a domain controller which is compiled and configured with LDAP support. The user and machine accounts are defined in LDAP. I manually added an Windows XP workstation to the domain (no problems here) using a root account also defined in LDAP. Now I would like to clone this machine to other machines using Norton Ghost 7.5. Therefore I have set up a Ghost Multicast Server. Now when I use to Ghost Console on the multicast server and try to add our domain to the list of supported domains in Ghost I get the error Procedure number out of range. On the Ghost Multicast Server there is the ghost configuration server service and on the client machine there is the ghost client agent service. Both of these services only start with a local system account. These services do not run under a domain account. If I try to run them under a domain account I get this error message: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion. Like I said, manually adding a machine to the domain gives no problems with the specified root account in LDAP (see below, I did not include all attributes off course). dn: uid=root, ou=xxx, o=xxx, c=xxx objectClass: sambaAccount uid: root rid: 1000 uidNumber: 0 gidNumber: 0 Kind regards, Werner Maes At 15:20 23/06/2003, Dan Gapinski wrote: Yes - sorry. I made a regular account for Ghost (which you could make with adduser or useradd or handcoding the passwd file) and added it to a group (in the groups file) that I called admin. In smb.conf, I added a line that went like this: domain admin group = @admin So that worked like a charm. Hope that helps, Dan - Original Message - From: werner maes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dan Gapinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Ghost Create account: procedure number out of range inSamba Hello Dan, Thanks for yor reply ! But what exactly do you mean with making a regular administrator account for Ghost? Is it an entry in /etc/passwd or smbpasswd for administrator? Could you give more specific details? Kind regards, Werner Maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Ghost Create account: procedure number out ofrange inSamba
domain admin group = root (in smb.conf) I have defined the user 'root' in LDAP. On the client I added the domain users to the administrators group. I try to run the services under this root account on the domain but the services will only run under a local system account and not under a domain account. That seems to be the problem. With this user 'root' it is possible to manually join the client to the domain and to logon to the domain. I've tried about everything but still no solution Still hoping though :-) Werner Maes At 09:39 24/06/2003, Dan Gapinski wrote: I see - what type of domain account are you using? Your method is right tho, setting the services to run under a domain account. I just want you to be absolutely sure that the account is administrator. If this is a test environment, you could start by running the service as root, and see if it works then (though I would not do that in production). Dan - Original Message - From: werner maes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dan Gapinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 4:35 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Ghost Create account: procedure number out ofrange inSamba Sorry to bother you again but in my situation with LDAP authentication it doesn't seem to work. I'll explain the configuration in detail. I have a Samba 2.2.8a domain controller which is compiled and configured with LDAP support. The user and machine accounts are defined in LDAP. I manually added an Windows XP workstation to the domain (no problems here) using a root account also defined in LDAP. Now I would like to clone this machine to other machines using Norton Ghost 7.5. Therefore I have set up a Ghost Multicast Server. Now when I use to Ghost Console on the multicast server and try to add our domain to the list of supported domains in Ghost I get the error Procedure number out of range. On the Ghost Multicast Server there is the ghost configuration server service and on the client machine there is the ghost client agent service. Both of these services only start with a local system account. These services do not run under a domain account. If I try to run them under a domain account I get this error message: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion. Like I said, manually adding a machine to the domain gives no problems with the specified root account in LDAP (see below, I did not include all attributes off course). dn: uid=root, ou=xxx, o=xxx, c=xxx objectClass: sambaAccount uid: root rid: 1000 uidNumber: 0 gidNumber: 0 Kind regards, Werner Maes At 15:20 23/06/2003, Dan Gapinski wrote: Yes - sorry. I made a regular account for Ghost (which you could make with adduser or useradd or handcoding the passwd file) and added it to a group (in the groups file) that I called admin. In smb.conf, I added a line that went like this: domain admin group = @admin So that worked like a charm. Hope that helps, Dan - Original Message - From: werner maes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dan Gapinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [Samba] Ghost Create account: procedure number out of range inSamba Hello Dan, Thanks for yor reply ! But what exactly do you mean with making a regular administrator account for Ghost? Is it an entry in /etc/passwd or smbpasswd for administrator? Could you give more specific details? Kind regards, Werner Maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Ghost Create account: procedure number out of range in Samba
Hello, I would like to clone a Windows XP workstation that's part of a Samba domain using Norton Ghost. In Ghost you need to create an account in the domain to be able to add your domain to the list of supported domains by the Norton Ghost console. When I try to add such an account, I get this error message: Unable to add DOMAIN to the list of supported domains, The procedure number is out of range. Error code: 2147944145. I use samba 2.2.8a and LDAP for authentication. There's no problem with this authentication as everything else (logging in, adding machines to the domain,...) works fine. Does anybody have an idea? Thanks, Werner Maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Ghost Create account: procedure number out of range inSamba
Hello Dan, Thanks for yor reply ! But what exactly do you mean with making a regular administrator account for Ghost? Is it an entry in /etc/passwd or smbpasswd for administrator? Could you give more specific details? Kind regards, Werner Maes Dan Gapinski wrote: I had that problem. I ended up making a regular administrator account for Ghost and then telling the Ghost service to run under that account. Ghost tries to set up it's own limited account on an NT domain with only the right to add and remove machines to and from the domain, which (to my limited knowledge, please correct me if I am wrong) Samba 2.x does not allow. Once I did that, it worked fine. My best, Dan (former employee of Binary Research) Gapinski - Original Message - From: werner maes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: [Samba] Ghost Create account: procedure number out of range in Samba Hello, I would like to clone a Windows XP workstation that's part of a Samba domain using Norton Ghost. In Ghost you need to create an account in the domain to be able to add your domain to the list of supported domains by the Norton Ghost console. When I try to add such an account, I get this error message: Unable to add DOMAIN to the list of supported domains, The procedure number is out of range. Error code: 2147944145. I use samba 2.2.8a and LDAP for authentication. There's no problem with this authentication as everything else (logging in, adding machines to the domain,...) works fine. Does anybody have an idea? Thanks, Werner Maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba 2.2.5 + OpenLDAP 2.x - Caveats?
Samba can hit your LDAP server *hard*. I would suggest keeping LDAP on localhost if at all possible - and use LDAP replication from there. So make the on-site machines BDCs, and have one PDC centrally. This type of solution has been implemented. Watch out your version of nss_ldap - some are buggy and cause a lot of 'connection reset by peer' stuff. Andrew Bartlett Hello, Could you tell me wich versions of nss_ldap are buggy are which are not? I sometime face these connection by peer messages and have no idea what causes them. I use nss_ldap-189. Werner Maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Oplock break state
Hello, We encounter some problems with Samba 2.2.5 M$ Office: When a client starts up Word or any other Office component, the software won't load. In our samba logs these messages occur: [2002/09/23 17:26:41, 2] smbd/process.c:switch_message(695) switch_message: queueing message due to being in oplock break state. Does anybody know what this message means? Kind regards, Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba-LDAP:Ldap call each time you open a text file?
At 11:14 19/06/2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote: werner maes wrote: Hello, When I open a text file on a Samba fileserver using LDAP for authentication, Samba always makes these LDAP calls (see below). The user has been authenticated so why does Samba still makes these LDAP connections? Samba's ldap handling is 'inefficient' to say the least. It also hits the underlying getpw*() interface a fair bit - particulary becouse clients often request additional info about a file - like owner - and sysadmins have various smb.conf options set. Thanks for the information. Do you know whether this ldap handling will be improved? I tried to eliminate the smb.conf options that could effect this behaviour but with no result. The ldap calls were still made. Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba-LDAP:Ldap call each time you open a text file?
Hello, When I open a text file on a Samba fileserver using LDAP for authentication, Samba always makes these LDAP calls (see below). The user has been authenticated so why does Samba still makes these LDAP connections? Any ideas? /var/log/ldap.log when opening a text file. ldap-hh slapd[22940]: conn=3922 op=19 SRCH base=o=kuleuven,c=be scope=2 filter=(uid=m2000944) ldap-hh slapd[22940]: conn=3922 op=19 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 text= ldap-hh slapd[22942]: conn=3922 op=20 SRCH base=o=kuleuven,c=be scope=2 filter=((objectClass=posixGroup)(|(memberUid=m2000944)(uniqueMember=uid=m2000944,ou=stud,o=kuleuven,c=be))) ldap-hh slapd[22942]: conn=3922 op=20 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 text= ldap-hh slapd[22944]: conn=3922 op=21 SRCH base=o=kuleuven,c=be scope=2 filter=(uid=m2000944) ldap-hh slapd[22944]: conn=3922 op=21 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 text= ldap-hh slapd[22954]: conn=3922 op=22 SRCH base=o=kuleuven,c=be scope=2 filter=((objectClass=posixGroup)(|(memberUid=m2000944)(uniqueMember=uid=m2000944,ou=stud,o=kuleuven,c=be))) ldap-hh slapd[22954]: conn=3922 op=22 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0 text= Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Error in netlogon service samba 2.2.4?
At 09:18 14/05/2002, you wrote: On Wed, 8 May 2002, werner maes wrote: Hello, If I try to mount the netlogon service using smbclient, I get this error message: [root@testserver /root]# smbclient //localhost/netlogon -U u0023628 INFO: Debug class all level = 2 (pid 7257 from pid 7257) added interface ip=10.33.6.132 bcast=10.33.6.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 127.0.0.1 ( 127.0.0.1 ) Password: Domain=[PCLAB] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.4] smb: \ ls . D0 Wed Nov 7 15:36:29 2001 .. D0 Mon May 6 15:07:59 2002 SAMPROF D0 Fri Feb 8 16:36:44 2002 scripts D0 Wed May 8 15:56:27 2002 test.batA 63 Mon Jul 9 15:36:01 2001 nts.bat A 37 Wed Nov 7 15:36:29 2001 Error in dskattr: SUCCESS - 0 smb: \ Segmentation fault (core dumped) As a result, the domain logon process fails (the logon scripts are not executed). On a Win98 PC I get the message: This device does not exist on the network, reading drive Z. In the logs, I get: [2002/05/08 16:07:35, 0] lib/util_sec.c:assert_gid(111) Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,5954) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) [2002/05/08 16:07:35, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1092) PANIC: failed to set gid This only happens with the netlogon share ! If I mount any other share, it works fine. Also this problem only occurs with certain user accounts. No problems with: uid=500(werner) gid=500(werner) groups=500(werner) Problem with: uid=16778(u0023628) gid=5954(LUDIT) groups=5954(LUDIT) What OS is this? Does you system fully support 32-bits uids/gids? Well, I've done some extra tests and I think that I've found the cause. I compiled the 2.2.4 source code on a RH 7.1 machine with XFS 1.1. Then I installed these created rpm's on a RH 7.1 machine with XFS 1.0.1 and it gave the problems which I described. Now I compiled the source code on the RH7.1 machine with XFS 1.0.1 and installed it and the problem did no longer occur. Of course, now I still have to find out whether samba-2.2.4 works on an machine with XFS 1.1. Werner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] TCP UDP port 445: microsoft-ds
Hello, Does Samba support connecting to a server using port 445 if you have Netbios over TCP/IP disabled on your client system? In Windows 2000/XP you have the possibility to disable Netbios over TCP/IP and use port 445 to make an SMB connection. I've done some tests and apparently samba (version 2.2.3a) does not support connections on port 445. Am I correct? If so, will this be possible in future releases of samba? Werner Maes -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
