Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Hi Denis, I was just wondering if any progress was made with regpatch? Yours hopefully :) Rich On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:08 +0200, denis.bonnenfant wrote: Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:01 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs in .reg parsing In fact it doesn't make sense to mount regf files to anything but HKCU , so -K option is not necessary, and HKCU can be hardcoded as mountpoint for files specified by -F option. I use this quite a bit and I'm aware of two bugs, which is not directly related to the parsing, but that on windows unicode is implicit for certain data types even when the data is given in binary format, it's still converted. The other 'bug' is that unicode .reg files are not yet supported. I'd be very interested to know what other bugs there are. I found some problems with value deletion, sometimes values are not deleted, reg_expand_sz data not correctly saved, but i'm not sure that the problem is in parsing. I'm going to experiment a little bit more. Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:08 +0200, denis.bonnenfant wrote: Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:01 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs in .reg parsing In fact it doesn't make sense to mount regf files to anything but HKCU , so -K option is not necessary, and HKCU can be hardcoded as mountpoint for files specified by -F option. Sorry if I am misunderstanding something here, but if the .reg file is modifying a software or system key shouldn't regpatch mount the appropriate hive, mounting under HKLM/Software system under HKLM/system etc. ? (I currently am using Ghost's linux ghregedit to do this, but I am hoping for a license free version, ... I have been searching for a very long time for something that actually works!) I was envisaging a usage along these lines; regpatch -F /mnt/xp/WINDOWS/ myregpatch.reg #regpatch loads the hives needed itself based on the WNIDOWS target dir (auto filling system32/config), this approximates to how ghrededit works ..or more in keeping with how its setup at the moment regpatch -F /mnt/something/software,/mnt/something/system myregpatch.reg #tell it what hives to load I appreciate all the effort everyone is putting in. Thanks. I use this quite a bit and I'm aware of two bugs, which is not directly related to the parsing, but that on windows unicode is implicit for certain data types even when the data is given in binary format, it's still converted. The other 'bug' is that unicode .reg files are not yet supported. I'd be very interested to know what other bugs there are. I found some problems with value deletion, sometimes values are not deleted, reg_expand_sz data not correctly saved, but i'm not sure that the problem is in parsing. I'm going to experiment a little bit more. Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:28 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, I was hoping I could modify a locally mounted registry hive using regpatch and a .reg file but the -F argument seems to have no function. Correct. It does not on regpatch, afaik. Try this patch (untested, but based on what regtree does). Won't work. See below. I've either got errors like: $ bin/regpatch -F /tmp/NTUSER.DAT /tmp/test.reg Error adding new key 'HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main I hope the patch helps, but I'm not sure that just using start_key-context is the right thing to do. Actually, the reason this doesn't work is that -F loads a registry hive, not a full registry and .reg files only work on a full registry. If you load a hive with -F you cannot patch it. A simple python script will work, however.. something like this: --- sys.path.append(samba_python_path) from samba import registry import samba.getopt as options # Open the hive lp = sambaopts.get_loadparm() creds = credopts.get_credentials(lp) hive = registry.open_hive(hivepath, lp_ctx=lp, credentials=creds) # Mount the hive to HKEY_CURRENT_USER reg = registry.Registry() reg.mount_hive(hive, registry.HKEY_CURRENT_USER) reg.diff_apply(patchfile) --- Regards, Wilco Baan Hofman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? The latter would be preferable, but you'd have to be able to specify mountpoints for the hives. --- sys.path.append(samba_python_path) from samba import registry import samba.getopt as options # Open the hive lp = sambaopts.get_loadparm() creds = credopts.get_credentials(lp) hive = registry.open_hive(hivepath, lp_ctx=lp, credentials=creds) So hivepath here is the path to e.g. some user's NTUSER.DAT? Indeed. # Mount the hive to HKEY_CURRENT_USER reg = registry.Registry() reg.mount_hive(hive, registry.HKEY_CURRENT_USER) reg.diff_apply(patchfile) --- Regards, Wilco Baan Hofman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs in .reg parsing Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:01 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs in .reg parsing I use this quite a bit and I'm aware of two bugs, which is not directly related to the parsing, but that on windows unicode is implicit for certain data types even when the data is given in binary format, it's still converted. The other 'bug' is that unicode .reg files are not yet supported. I'd be very interested to know what other bugs there are. Regards, Wilco Baan Hofman -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:01 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs in .reg parsing In fact it doesn't make sense to mount regf files to anything but HKCU , so -K option is not necessary, and HKCU can be hardcoded as mountpoint for files specified by -F option. I use this quite a bit and I'm aware of two bugs, which is not directly related to the parsing, but that on windows unicode is implicit for certain data types even when the data is given in binary format, it's still converted. The other 'bug' is that unicode .reg files are not yet supported. I'd be very interested to know what other bugs there are. I found some problems with value deletion, sometimes values are not deleted, reg_expand_sz data not correctly saved, but i'm not sure that the problem is in parsing. I'm going to experiment a little bit more. Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
On 18 May 2011 01:55, Wilco Baan Hofman wi...@baanhofman.nl wrote: On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:28 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, I was hoping I could modify a locally mounted registry hive using regpatch and a .reg file but the -F argument seems to have no function. Correct. It does not on regpatch, afaik. Try this patch (untested, but based on what regtree does). Won't work. See below. I've either got errors like: $ bin/regpatch -F /tmp/NTUSER.DAT /tmp/test.reg Error adding new key 'HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main I hope the patch helps, but I'm not sure that just using start_key-context is the right thing to do. Actually, the reason this doesn't work is that -F loads a registry hive, not a full registry and .reg files only work on a full registry. If you load a hive with -F you cannot patch it. Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? A simple python script will work, however.. something like this: --- sys.path.append(samba_python_path) from samba import registry import samba.getopt as options # Open the hive lp = sambaopts.get_loadparm() creds = credopts.get_credentials(lp) hive = registry.open_hive(hivepath, lp_ctx=lp, credentials=creds) So hivepath here is the path to e.g. some user's NTUSER.DAT? # Mount the hive to HKEY_CURRENT_USER reg = registry.Registry() reg.mount_hive(hive, registry.HKEY_CURRENT_USER) reg.diff_apply(patchfile) --- Regards, Wilco Baan Hofman -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 00:28 +0200, Michael Wood a écrit : On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, Hi, Two years ago, I worked a bit on this. There was a lot of things to be done for full support of regf files patching . My patches mostly worked, but I never submitted it because I finally decided to generate .pol files with a small python script and appmently it on client side instead of patching regf files server-side. So I'm going to resurrect my old sources, rebase it on current git, and hope it helps... As far as I remember, there was some problems with regf format writing, and the registry files generated were sometimes corrupted. Investigating it may be quite difficult, as regf format is not simple and badly documented. But maybe some work was already done yet ? Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 10:26 +0200, denis bonnenfant a écrit : Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 00:28 +0200, Michael Wood a écrit : On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, Hi, Two years ago, I worked a bit on this. There was a lot of things to be done for full support of regf files patching . My patches mostly worked, but I never submitted it because I finally decided to generate .pol files with a small python script and appmently it on client side instead of patching regf files server-side. So I'm going to resurrect my old sources, rebase it on current git, and hope it helps... As far as I remember, there was some problems with regf format writing, and the registry files generated were sometimes corrupted. Investigating it may be quite difficult, as regf format is not simple and badly documented. But maybe some work was already done yet ? I had a look, and the merge is not straightforward. So I have work on it a little bit. Hopefully, regf code seems corrected, so I expect some good news... Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Hi Michael, Many thanks for your reply - have tried your second patch on the git I just pulled, and got about as far as you, .reg file contains a bit for system and software hive, first entry in it relates to software hive against software hive rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ ./regpatch -d=10 -F /tmp/config/software /tmp/config/RunOnceEx.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 Attempting to load registry file 3444 HBIN blocks read Opening parent of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE failed with WERR_BADFILE Error adding new key 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows \CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx\940': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows \CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx\940 rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ against system hive rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ ./regpatch -d=10 -F /tmp/config/system /tmp/config/RunOnceEx.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 Attempting to load registry file 789 HBIN blocks read Opening parent of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE failed with WERR_BADFILE Error adding new key 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows \CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx\940': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows \CurrentVersion\RunOnceEx\940 rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ changing order of things in .reg file so system hive alteration is first bit rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ ./regpatch -d=10 -F /tmp/config/system /tmp/config/RunOnceEx2.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 Attempting to load registry file 789 HBIN blocks read Opening parent of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM failed with WERR_BADFILE Error adding new key 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services \Intelppm': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services \Intelppm rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ removed all system hive references, only entry relates to system hive rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ ./regpatch -d=10 -F /tmp/config/system /tmp/config/RunOnceEx3.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 Attempting to load registry file 789 HBIN blocks read Opening parent of HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM failed with WERR_BADFILE Error adding new key 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services \Intelppm': WERR_BADFILE Error adding key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services \Intelppm not specifying a hive so it writes to local samba hklm.tdb (seems to work fine) rfm6@KubuntuSSDx64:/media/7200.12/clonemod/source/samba4/bin/default/source4/lib/registry$ sudo ./regpatch -d=10 /tmp/config/RunOnceEx.reg INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr: @LIST control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: no modules required by the db ldb: No modules specified for this database ldb: ldb_trace_request: REGISTER_CONTROL 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1413 control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: rootDSE scope: base expr: (objectClass=*) attr: rootDomainNamingContext attr: configurationNamingContext attr: schemaNamingContext attr: defaultNamingContext control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb_wrap open of /usr/local/samba/private/hklm.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Bonjour Denis, I would be very grateful if you manage to do it! Rich On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 17:41 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 10:26 +0200, denis bonnenfant a écrit : Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 00:28 +0200, Michael Wood a écrit : On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, Hi, Two years ago, I worked a bit on this. There was a lot of things to be done for full support of regf files patching . My patches mostly worked, but I never submitted it because I finally decided to generate .pol files with a small python script and appmently it on client side instead of patching regf files server-side. So I'm going to resurrect my old sources, rebase it on current git, and hope it helps... As far as I remember, there was some problems with regf format writing, and the registry files generated were sometimes corrupted. Investigating it may be quite difficult, as regf format is not simple and badly documented. But maybe some work was already done yet ? I had a look, and the merge is not straightforward. So I have work on it a little bit. Hopefully, regf code seems corrected, so I expect some good news... Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Hi, I was hoping I could modify a locally mounted registry hive using regpatch and a .reg file but the -F argument seems to have no function. (Strace shows it ignores it and just operates on /var/lib/samba/private/hklm.ldb) Below is output with debug on. rfm6@ubuntuSSDx64:cp /mnt/xp/WINDOWS/system32/config/software /tmp/software rfm6@ubuntuSSDx64:/tmp/config$ sudo regpatch -d=10 -F software RunOnceSoftware.reg lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [global] Unknown parameter encountered: max log size Ignoring unknown parameter max log size Unknown parameter encountered: syslog Ignoring unknown parameter syslog Unknown parameter encountered: passdb backend Ignoring unknown parameter passdb backend Unknown parameter encountered: unix password sync Ignoring unknown parameter unix password sync Unknown parameter encountered: passwd program Ignoring unknown parameter passwd program Unknown parameter encountered: pam password change Ignoring unknown parameter pam password change Unknown parameter encountered: map to guest Ignoring unknown parameter map to guest Unknown parameter encountered: usershare allow guests Ignoring unknown parameter usershare allow guests Processing section [printers] Unknown parameter encountered: guest ok Ignoring unknown parameter guest ok Processing section [print$] Unknown parameter encountered: guest ok Ignoring unknown parameter guest ok pm_process() returned Yes ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr: @LIST control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: no modules required by the db ldb: No modules specified for this database ldb: ldb_trace_request: REGISTER_CONTROL 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1413 control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: rootDSE scope: base expr: (objectClass=*) attr: rootDomainNamingContext attr: configurationNamingContext attr: schemaNamingContext attr: defaultNamingContext control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb_wrap open of /var/lib/samba/private/hklm.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES changetype: add key: CASE_INSENSITIVE value: CASE_INSENSITIVE control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-add ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-prepare_commit ldb: commit ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-end_transaction ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr: @LIST control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: no modules required by the db ldb: No modules specified for this database ldb: ldb_trace_request: REGISTER_CONTROL 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1413 control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: rootDSE scope: base expr: (objectClass=*) attr: rootDomainNamingContext attr: configurationNamingContext attr: schemaNamingContext attr: defaultNamingContext control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb_wrap open of /var/lib/samba/private/hkcr.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES changetype: add key: CASE_INSENSITIVE value: CASE_INSENSITIVE control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-add ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-prepare_commit ldb: commit ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-end_transaction ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr: @LIST control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: no modules required by the db ldb: No modules specified for this database ldb: ldb_trace_request: REGISTER_CONTROL 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1413 control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: rootDSE scope: base expr: (objectClass=*) attr: rootDomainNamingContext attr: configurationNamingContext attr: schemaNamingContext attr: defaultNamingContext control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb_wrap open of /var/lib/samba/private/hkcu.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES changetype: add key: CASE_INSENSITIVE value: CASE_INSENSITIVE control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-add ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-prepare_commit ldb: commit ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-end_transaction ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr: @LIST control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: no modules required by the db ldb: No modules specified for this database ldb: ldb_trace_request: REGISTER_CONTROL 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1413 control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: rootDSE scope: base expr: (objectClass=*) attr:
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, I was hoping I could modify a locally mounted registry hive using regpatch and a .reg file but the -F argument seems to have no function. Try this patch (untested, but based on what regtree does). I haven't looked at the other issues you mention, though. (Strace shows it ignores it and just operates on /var/lib/samba/private/hklm.ldb) Below is output with debug on. rfm6@ubuntuSSDx64:cp /mnt/xp/WINDOWS/system32/config/software /tmp/software rfm6@ubuntuSSDx64:/tmp/config$ sudo regpatch -d=10 -F software RunOnceSoftware.reg lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section [global] Unknown parameter encountered: max log size Ignoring unknown parameter max log size Unknown parameter encountered: syslog Ignoring unknown parameter syslog Unknown parameter encountered: passdb backend Ignoring unknown parameter passdb backend Unknown parameter encountered: unix password sync Ignoring unknown parameter unix password sync Unknown parameter encountered: passwd program Ignoring unknown parameter passwd program Unknown parameter encountered: pam password change Ignoring unknown parameter pam password change Unknown parameter encountered: map to guest Ignoring unknown parameter map to guest Unknown parameter encountered: usershare allow guests Ignoring unknown parameter usershare allow guests Processing section [printers] Unknown parameter encountered: guest ok Ignoring unknown parameter guest ok Processing section [print$] Unknown parameter encountered: guest ok Ignoring unknown parameter guest ok pm_process() returned Yes ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr: @LIST control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: no modules required by the db ldb: No modules specified for this database ldb: ldb_trace_request: REGISTER_CONTROL 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1413 control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: rootDSE scope: base expr: (objectClass=*) attr: rootDomainNamingContext attr: configurationNamingContext attr: schemaNamingContext attr: defaultNamingContext control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb_wrap open of /var/lib/samba/private/hklm.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES changetype: add key: CASE_INSENSITIVE value: CASE_INSENSITIVE control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-add ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-prepare_commit ldb: commit ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-end_transaction ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr: @LIST control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: no modules required by the db ldb: No modules specified for this database ldb: ldb_trace_request: REGISTER_CONTROL 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1413 control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: rootDSE scope: base expr: (objectClass=*) attr: rootDomainNamingContext attr: configurationNamingContext attr: schemaNamingContext attr: defaultNamingContext control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb_wrap open of /var/lib/samba/private/hkcr.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES changetype: add key: CASE_INSENSITIVE value: CASE_INSENSITIVE control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-add ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-prepare_commit ldb: commit ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-end_transaction ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr: @LIST control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb: no modules required by the db ldb: No modules specified for this database ldb: ldb_trace_request: REGISTER_CONTROL 1.2.840.113556.1.4.1413 control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: rootDSE scope: base expr: (objectClass=*) attr: rootDomainNamingContext attr: configurationNamingContext attr: schemaNamingContext attr: defaultNamingContext control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-search ldb_wrap open of /var/lib/samba/private/hkcu.ldb ldb: start ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-start_transaction ldb: start ldb transaction error: (null) ldb: ldb_trace_request: ADD dn: @ATTRIBUTES changetype: add key: CASE_INSENSITIVE value: CASE_INSENSITIVE control: NONE ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-add ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-prepare_commit ldb: commit ldb transaction (nesting: 0) ldb: ldb_trace_request: (tdb)-end_transaction ldb: ldb_trace_request: SEARCH dn: @MODULES scope: base expr: (@LIST=*) attr:
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, I was hoping I could modify a locally mounted registry hive using regpatch and a .reg file but the -F argument seems to have no function. Try this patch (untested, but based on what regtree does). Sorry, ignore that patch. I was way too hasty. There a bit more needed and I missed that it was assigning to start_key instead of h. -- Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote:
Hi,
I was hoping I could modify a locally mounted registry hive using
regpatch and a .reg file but the -F argument seems to have no function.
Try this patch (untested, but based on what regtree does).
I don't know if this does the right thing, but it does at least read
the specified file.
I've tried to test it on some arbitrary registry hive files and .reg
files I've managed to dig up or find online, but I'm not sure I'm
using regpatch properly. I've either got errors like:
$ bin/regpatch -F /tmp/NTUSER.DAT /tmp/test.reg
Error adding new key 'HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet
Explorer\Main': WERR_BADFILE
Error adding key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main
or no output whatsoever and apparently no change to the hive.
I hope the patch helps, but I'm not sure that just using
start_key-context is the right thing to do.
--
Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com
From 96ca078cb4fb218161a1a47edf751bef8a76845c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 22:04:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] regpatch: Don't ignore the -F option.
---
source4/lib/registry/tools/regpatch.c |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/source4/lib/registry/tools/regpatch.c b/source4/lib/registry/tools/regpatch.c
index a8c1843..ebb5a69 100644
--- a/source4/lib/registry/tools/regpatch.c
+++ b/source4/lib/registry/tools/regpatch.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
poptContext pc;
const char *patch;
struct registry_context *h;
+ struct registry_key *start_key = NULL;
const char *file = NULL;
const char *remote = NULL;
struct tevent_context *ev_ctx;
@@ -53,11 +54,13 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
if (remote) {
h = reg_common_open_remote (remote, ev_ctx, cmdline_lp_ctx, cmdline_credentials);
+ } else if (file != NULL) {
+ start_key = reg_common_open_file (file, ev_ctx, cmdline_lp_ctx, cmdline_credentials);
} else {
h = reg_common_open_local (cmdline_credentials, ev_ctx, cmdline_lp_ctx);
}
- if (h == NULL)
+ if (h == NULL start_key == NULL)
return 1;
patch = poptGetArg(pc);
@@ -68,6 +71,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
poptFreeContext(pc);
+if (start_key != NULL)
+h = start_key-context;
+
reg_diff_apply(h, patch);
return 0;
--
1.7.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
