[no subject]

2002-04-18 Thread Erika

Hello Toby and all,

Long time no talk to :-). I have been too ill to read the posts for
some time now, and I've had no luck unsubscribing from the
Tullochgorum website, so Toby, could you unsubscribe me manually
please?

Best,
Erica Mackenzie

P.S. I am posting this to the list at large intentionally, as I don't
want to miss an opportunity to be roundly abused in Lallans by Mr
Adkins :-).
--

best,

Erica Mackenzie
Megalong Valley,
N.S.W.
AUSTRALIA

Windows© 98 (n) - 32-bit extensions and graphical shell for a
16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a
4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1
bit of competition.
Posted to Scots-L - The Traditional Scottish Music  Culture List - To 
subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [scots-l] Tonic Sol-Fa

2002-04-18 Thread John Chambers

Nigel wrote:
 It was the precursor of ABC notation in the days long before personal
 computers and the internet. Simple, could be written using a
 typewriter, able to handle accidentals, upper and lower octaves,
 rhythm. I believe Gavin Greig used it in his collecting folk song in
 the North East of Scotland. Sam Henry did the same in Northern Ireland.
 Paddy Moloney of The Chieftains still uses it, I believe.

I've googled Tonic Sol Fa and looked at a number of the sites  that
aren't  about  the shlocky group by that name.  I'd say that it isn't
ready for prime time on the Web.  True, a lot of people  seem  to  be
familiar  with  it.  But of the songs that I found (and there weren't
many), there was very little consistency in  the  notation,  and  one
would  have  to  put  out a huge effort to write code that could make
sense of it.  We have problems with inconsistent abc, but  abc  is  a
paragon of standardization in comparison with tonic sol fa.

If people were interested in making it a useful  Web  notation,  we'd
want  to  try  to  foist  a  standard  syntax on its users to make it
tractable to software.  This might be easy or difficult, depending on
how  the established user community reacts.

Probably the best way to do it would be to  form  a  small  cabal  to
develop some useful software in stealth mode, together with a few web
sites with a lot of the music that the users will want  to  download.
If  the  online  tunes  and software are useful to the users, they'll
probably jump on the bandwagon.

Given that much of the existing user community  consists  of  schools
and  community  choral groups, the best idea might be to develop some
java (or javascript) tools to download, play,  and  edit  TSF  files.
This would make it useful no matter what sort of computer they're on.
Provide songs from common songbooks  for  downloading,  and  it  just
might take off.


Posted to Scots-L - The Traditional Scottish Music  Culture List - To 
subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [scots-l] Unsubscribe

2002-04-18 Thread Steve Wyrick

Janice Parton wrote:

 please unsubscribe me. Tnaks.

and Erika wrote:

 Long time no talk to :-). I have been too ill to read the posts for
 some time now, and I've had no luck unsubscribing from the
 Tullochgorum website, so Toby, could you unsubscribe me manually
 please?
 
 Best,
 Erica Mackenzie
 
 P.S. I am posting this to the list at large intentionally, as I don't
 want to miss an opportunity to be roundly abused in Lallans by Mr
 Adkins :-).

It seems to be easy to get a subscription to this list but almost impossible
to get off!  What's up with that, Toby?  It should be the other way around
:-)  I also asked to unsubscribe my old Earthlink account a couple weeks ago
since I switched ISPs but am still getting double posts of everything!  BTW,
where IS Colonel Adkins these days?  Haven't heard from him in a while!
-Steve
-- 
Steve Wyrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Concord, California


Posted to Scots-L - The Traditional Scottish Music  Culture List - To 
subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html



Re: [scots-l] Jack's ABCs (was: Few Notes)

2002-04-18 Thread John Chambers

Nigel Gatherer wrote:
| Jack Campin wrote:
|  - can you handle a 200-tune file with all the tunes numbered zero?
|This is to stop John Chambers' Tune Finder plagiarizing my stuff
|by ripping things out of context (which he already has done with
|the current version despite my explicit request both in the file
|and on this list for him to desist)...
|
| What did he say? John is, on the strength of his usenet/mailing list
| contributions, a decent, fair-minded chap with enough know-how and
| ingenuity to create his tune-finding software. I'd bet that with his
| considerable abilities he'd be able simply to devise a way of
| preserving your material so that it isn't accessible.

Hmmm ...  I'd thought I did what Jack asked.  To my knowledge, my abc
tune finder will not return single files from his files that have X:0
for the tunes.  I even fixed a bug (which I'd thought a feature ;-)
in which the ABC link returned only the tunes and not the surrounding
text.  For X:0 it now returns the entire file,  exactly  as  the  Get
link, but with text/vnd.abc as the MIME type.

So I'm curious about how I done any ripping, on or off.  I'd like  to
know  how my tune finder can be used to extract just one of the tunes
from Jack's X:0 files.  I don't know how to do it myself.

In any case, my search bot has a config file in which I can  tell  it
to  ignore  a  host  or a URL (and anything it points to).  If anyone
wants only part of their abc collection indexed  and  made  available
through  my  tune  finder,  I  can  exclude  single  files  or  whole
directories.

(That paragraph was why I decided  to  post  this  rather  than  just
sending  a  note  to  Jack.   I'd like to invite people to tell me if
they'd like some of  their  tunes  excluded  from  my  tune  finder's
indexes.   Remember that it can only be done on a per-URL basis.  One
file or one directory and its subdirectories, or the equivalent  with
trees of web pages.)

One thing I can't do, of course, is prevent someone else  from  using
my  links to download a file and chop it up.  Nobody can prevent this
on someone else's machine.  Most abc tools that I know  of  have  the
ability  to  separate  out  parts  of abc files (single tunes, single
voices, just melody without chords, whatever). This is natural; music
tools  that can't do such chopping wouldn't be very useful.  The only
way I know to effectively prevent this is to not put a  file  on  the
web.

Also, the main (one might say only) purpose of my tune finder  is  to
locate specific tunes and download them.  If you don't want people to
do this, maybe it's best if I don't index your files at all.   A  few
people  have  requested  this,  and I've put them in my avoid list.
They can still potentially be found through the big search sites, but
such sites aren't too good at specialized things like abc.

| The first thing you've got to do is speak with each other. Tell him
| what you want to happen and what you don't want to happen. If you feel
| you've already done that, persevere: perhaps there has been a
| misunderstanding.

Yeah; I thought I understood what Jack wanted, and supplied it. I was
obviously wrong.

Posted to Scots-L - The Traditional Scottish Music  Culture List - To 
subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html