RFR: JDK-7107018: sun.jvm.hotspot.utilities.soql.JSJavaHeap.forEachClass incorrect test
Please review the trivial fix for the bug below (Unfortunately, the bug is marked confidential): https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7107018 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jgeorge/7107018/webrev.00/index.html Thanks, - Jini Susan George
Re: RFR - JDK-8006078 : [findbugs] java.lang.management.ThreadInfo returns mutable objects
Looks good to me too. Fred On 11/02/2016 05:58 AM, Amit Sapre wrote: Hello, Can I have one more review for these changes ? -Original Message- From: David Holmes Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 12:22 AM To: Amit Sapre; serviceability-dev Subject: Re: RFR - JDK-8006078 : [findbugs] java.lang.management.ThreadInfo returns mutable objects Hi Amit, On 28/10/2016 4:12 PM, Amit Sapre wrote: Hello, Summary : Fixed findbugs reported warnings. Bug ID : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8006078 Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asapre/webrev/JDK- 8006078/webrev.00/ Looks okay. I hope the extra memory usage is not an issue for any tests. David, I had run svc sanity tests only. If there are specific tests which I should run as well, Do let me know. Thanks, David Thanks, Amit
RE: RFR - JDK-8006078 : [findbugs] java.lang.management.ThreadInfo returns mutable objects
Hello, Can I have one more review for these changes ? > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes > Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 12:22 AM > To: Amit Sapre; serviceability-dev > Subject: Re: RFR - JDK-8006078 : [findbugs] > java.lang.management.ThreadInfo returns mutable objects > > Hi Amit, > > On 28/10/2016 4:12 PM, Amit Sapre wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Summary : Fixed findbugs reported warnings. > > > > Bug ID : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8006078 > > > > Webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asapre/webrev/JDK- > 8006078/webrev.00/ > > Looks okay. I hope the extra memory usage is not an issue for any > tests. David, I had run svc sanity tests only. If there are specific tests which I should run as well, Do let me know. > > Thanks, > David > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Amit > >