Re: [silk] What book changed your mind?

2014-11-16 Thread John Sundman
I was happy to see The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the 
Bicameral Mind on the list in the Chronicle (although it's more than 30 years 
old. Closer to 40, I think.)  I remember reading it shortly after it came out, 
and while some of its conclusions seemed a bit of a stretch, it was certainly 
provocative  answered questions that I had never thought about but which are 
in fact interesting  legitimate. 

If I had to choose 1 non-fiction book that has changed my mind it would be 
Hofstadter's Goedel Escher Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid.  (It too is dates 
from 1970's but if Jaynes gets in, then I'll assume Hofstadter can too.)  This 
book changed me in two ways. The first was in tying together the various ideas 
about recursion, self-similarity, and of course the Strange Loop, and the 
provocative thesis that strange loops are at the core of self-awareness  
consciousness (which I believe is very likely on the right track  which has 
certainly influenced me as a novelist; all of my work touches on this central 
idea in one way or another).  

The second way that the book changed me was in convincing me that I could 
understand concepts that had scared me away before I read it. I graduated from 
college in 1974, a few years before I read GEB. In college I didn't take a 
single math (maths) course or course in logic. After college I spent 2 years 
in the Peace Corps, most of that time living in a mud hut on the edge of the 
Sahara, a full day's travel from reliable electricity or running water. I was 
interested in agriculture  my philosophy was pretty romantic -- still feeling 
the after effects of the whole hippie thing.  GEB showed me that what I really 
love, where I'm really at home, is in the geek world where ideas  fixations 
like his predominate.

jrs



On Nov 14, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Thaths wrote:

 This post
 http://chronicle.com/article/What-Book-Changed-Your-Mind-/149839/ of
 people talking about the books that changed their minds made me wonder
 
 Which book made *you*, dear Silk lister, change your mind? How?
 
 A handful of books have had such an impact on me. I need to whittle it down
 to one.
 
 Thaths
 PS: The annual Silk List Book Recommendations thread is starting early this
 year.




Re: [silk] What book changed your mind?

2014-11-16 Thread Charles Haynes
 Destructive Emotions: A Scientific Dialogue with the Dalai Lama by Daniel
Goleman

As a rationalist and skeptic, I had been extremely suspicious of woo woo
claims about meditation, but I was interested is Dan Goleman's research
into meditation and stress and I was intrigued by the scientific dialog
claim. I was reading along with a rather skeptical attitude when I ran
across a chapter talking about an experiment that Paul Ekman did with a
trained meditator, in which he suppressed his startle reflex. That should
not be possible! Digging further I discovered that meditation does seem to
have objective measurable effects and I now meditate daily. Because of this
book.

-- Charles

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:57 AM, John Sundman j...@wetmachine.com wrote:

 I was happy to see The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the
 Bicameral Mind on the list in the Chronicle (although it's more than 30
 years old. Closer to 40, I think.)  I remember reading it shortly after it
 came out, and while some of its conclusions seemed a bit of a stretch, it
 was certainly provocative  answered questions that I had never thought
 about but which are in fact interesting  legitimate.

 If I had to choose 1 non-fiction book that has changed my mind it would be
 Hofstadter's Goedel Escher Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid.  (It too is dates
 from 1970's but if Jaynes gets in, then I'll assume Hofstadter can too.)
 This book changed me in two ways. The first was in tying together the
 various ideas about recursion, self-similarity, and of course the Strange
 Loop, and the provocative thesis that strange loops are at the core of
 self-awareness  consciousness (which I believe is very likely on the right
 track  which has certainly influenced me as a novelist; all of my work
 touches on this central idea in one way or another).

 The second way that the book changed me was in convincing me that I could
 understand concepts that had scared me away before I read it. I graduated
 from college in 1974, a few years before I read GEB. In college I didn't
 take a single math (maths) course or course in logic. After college I
 spent 2 years in the Peace Corps, most of that time living in a mud hut on
 the edge of the Sahara, a full day's travel from reliable electricity or
 running water. I was interested in agriculture  my philosophy was pretty
 romantic -- still feeling the after effects of the whole hippie thing.  GEB
 showed me that what I really love, where I'm really at home, is in the geek
 world where ideas  fixations like his predominate.

 jrs



 On Nov 14, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Thaths wrote:

  This post
  http://chronicle.com/article/What-Book-Changed-Your-Mind-/149839/ of
  people talking about the books that changed their minds made me
 wonder
 
  Which book made *you*, dear Silk lister, change your mind? How?
 
  A handful of books have had such an impact on me. I need to whittle it
 down
  to one.
 
  Thaths
  PS: The annual Silk List Book Recommendations thread is starting early
 this
  year.





Re: [silk] What book changed your mind?

2014-11-16 Thread Tim Bray
The most important book in my life was Solzhenitsyn’s “One Day In the Life
of Ivan Denisovich”, which I read in my teens.  Because while I’ve always
read obsessively, all I read up till then  was formulaic sci-fi, often
re-reading the same one over and over.  It taught me that other kinds of
books – “serious” books – were worth trying.  I still like me some good
ol’-fashioned Space Opera, but Solzhenitzyn led me to a lifetime of
challenging myself to read big complicated books that try to be more than
entertainment.  Even though “Ivan Denisovich” is small and simple.  And
perfect.

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Charles Haynes charles.hay...@gmail.com
wrote:

  Destructive Emotions: A Scientific Dialogue with the Dalai Lama by Daniel
 Goleman

 As a rationalist and skeptic, I had been extremely suspicious of woo woo
 claims about meditation, but I was interested is Dan Goleman's research
 into meditation and stress and I was intrigued by the scientific dialog
 claim. I was reading along with a rather skeptical attitude when I ran
 across a chapter talking about an experiment that Paul Ekman did with a
 trained meditator, in which he suppressed his startle reflex. That should
 not be possible! Digging further I discovered that meditation does seem to
 have objective measurable effects and I now meditate daily. Because of this
 book.

 -- Charles

 On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:57 AM, John Sundman j...@wetmachine.com
 wrote:

  I was happy to see The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the
  Bicameral Mind on the list in the Chronicle (although it's more than 30
  years old. Closer to 40, I think.)  I remember reading it shortly after
 it
  came out, and while some of its conclusions seemed a bit of a stretch, it
  was certainly provocative  answered questions that I had never thought
  about but which are in fact interesting  legitimate.
 
  If I had to choose 1 non-fiction book that has changed my mind it would
 be
  Hofstadter's Goedel Escher Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid.  (It too is
 dates
  from 1970's but if Jaynes gets in, then I'll assume Hofstadter can too.)
  This book changed me in two ways. The first was in tying together the
  various ideas about recursion, self-similarity, and of course the Strange
  Loop, and the provocative thesis that strange loops are at the core of
  self-awareness  consciousness (which I believe is very likely on the
 right
  track  which has certainly influenced me as a novelist; all of my work
  touches on this central idea in one way or another).
 
  The second way that the book changed me was in convincing me that I could
  understand concepts that had scared me away before I read it. I graduated
  from college in 1974, a few years before I read GEB. In college I didn't
  take a single math (maths) course or course in logic. After college I
  spent 2 years in the Peace Corps, most of that time living in a mud hut
 on
  the edge of the Sahara, a full day's travel from reliable electricity or
  running water. I was interested in agriculture  my philosophy was pretty
  romantic -- still feeling the after effects of the whole hippie thing.
 GEB
  showed me that what I really love, where I'm really at home, is in the
 geek
  world where ideas  fixations like his predominate.
 
  jrs
 
 
 
  On Nov 14, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Thaths wrote:
 
   This post
   http://chronicle.com/article/What-Book-Changed-Your-Mind-/149839/ of
   people talking about the books that changed their minds made me
  wonder
  
   Which book made *you*, dear Silk lister, change your mind? How?
  
   A handful of books have had such an impact on me. I need to whittle it
  down
   to one.
  
   Thaths
   PS: The annual Silk List Book Recommendations thread is starting early
  this
   year.
 
 
 




-- 
- Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see
https://keybase.io/timbray)


Re: [silk] What book changed your mind?

2014-11-16 Thread Udhay Shankar N
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Thaths tha...@gmail.com wrote:

 Which book made *you*, dear Silk lister, change your mind? How?

Rudy Rucker's _Infinity and the Mind_.

1. It kicked off a lifelong fascination with the concept of infinity.
2. It provided an accessible introduction to Godel's Incompleteness
Theorems, which also changed my mind in many ways (no, Hofstadter was
*not* a good introduction, although GEB was great in many other ways)
3. It provided an interesting, previously unconsidered, way of
thinking about mysticism.

Udhay

PS: I invited Rudy to silk when I started it in 1997, but he declined. :)
-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))



Re: [silk] What book changed your mind?

2014-11-16 Thread Joy Bhattacharjya
Godel, Escher Bach. Douglas Hofstadter. Read it when I was seventeen, 
understood very little, but was absolutely staggered by what little I did 
understand. Godel's Incompleteness theorem changed my life view, if math could 
not be 'perfect,'  what could?