Re: [silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-12-02 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:54:25AM -, lukhman_khan wrote:

  There is of course the problem that the jump is physically impossible.
 
 The people who make those movies never factor in the IQ levels of the
 target audience. They think we are fools/dumb anyway.

In 98% of all cases, they're correct.
 



Re: [silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-12-02 Thread Giancarlo Livraghi


 The people who make those movies never factor in the IQ levels
 of the target audience. They think we are fools/dumb anyway.

 In 98% of all cases, they're correct.

True. But does it really matter if it's physically possible?  It's 
fiction, anyway.


The real problem is that most of those movies are quite boring - and the 
imagination is unimaginative.





Re: [silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-12-02 Thread Alok G. Singh
Giancarlo Livraghi wrote:

 The real problem is that most of those movies are quite boring - and
 the imagination is unimaginative.

I agree. Many /good/ movies play fast and loose with the laws of physics
as we know them.

-- 
Alok

BOFH excuse #112:

The monitor is plugged into the serial port



Re: [silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-12-02 Thread Gautam John
Looks like there's a sequel in the making:

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Keanu-Might-Be-Addicted-To-Speed-11079.html



Re: [silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-12-01 Thread ashok _
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Gautam John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In the Reeves-Bullock movie Speed [1] where a bomb will go off on a
 bus if the speed of said bus should drop below 50 MPH there is a scene
 where the bus jumps over a break in a bridge

I saw a modern update of this film... where instead of a bus its a guy
(jason stratham) who is injected with some chinese cocktail drugs and
he will die if is heart-rate drops below 120...
so the first half hour of the film he has to keep running  / jumping /
leaping / talking very fast to keep his heart-rate above the lethal
rate. Quite funny for about 30 minutes.

[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0479884/]



Re: [silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-12-01 Thread lukhman_khan
 Gautam John wrote:
  ... there is a scene where the bus jumps over a break in a bridge
  [2]. My question is what speed would the bomb/speedometer register
  when the bus is airborne?  I'm thinking the bomb should have gone
  off when in the air...
 AFAIK, the speedometer relies on wheel/transmission revolutions so, a
 foot on the gas pedal should be enough to ensure that the speed does
 not drop below 50 mph.
 There is of course the problem that the jump is physically impossible.

The people who make those movies never factor in the IQ levels of the
target audience. They think we are fools/dumb anyway.

The moment the front wheels go into the ditch, gravity takes over and
its a nose dive.

Now supposing we put a jet engine at the rear to provide the thrust,
how the hell do we get the lift (without wings)?

Assuming all that is working, the engine has to be driving the same
set of wheels as the one recording the rpms. Even with his(her) foot
on the gas pedal, if the tachometer is connected to some wheel which
is not being driven by the engine, these blokes get blown up.

Lukhman




Re: [silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-12-01 Thread Srini Ramakrishnan
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:24 AM, lukhman_khan [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

[...]

 The people who make those movies never factor in the IQ levels of the
 target audience. They think we are fools/dumb anyway.


Stranger things are known to happen, maybe the bus was helped by a sudden
gust of tail wind :) In any case I am a believer in willing suspension of
disbelief if it will make my entertainment experience more immersive and
satisfying.

Cheeni


[silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-11-30 Thread Gautam John
In the Reeves-Bullock movie Speed [1] where a bomb will go off on a
bus if the speed of said bus should drop below 50 MPH there is a scene
where the bus jumps over a break in a bridge [2]. My question is what
speed would the bomb/speedometer register when the bus is airborne?
I'm thinking the bomb should have gone off when in the air...

No?


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_(film)

[2] http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=9tEAMLOupKs
-- 
Please read our new blog at: http://blog.prathambooks.org



Re: [silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-11-30 Thread Venkat Mangudi
Gautam John wrote:
 In the Reeves-Bullock movie Speed [1] where a bomb will go off on a
 bus if the speed of said bus should drop below 50 MPH there is a scene
 where the bus jumps over a break in a bridge [2]. My question is what
 speed would the bomb/speedometer register when the bus is airborne?
 I'm thinking the bomb should have gone off when in the air...

 No?
   
If you were doing 80 mph and jumped, it will take a while for the wheels
to stop spinning... Assumption is that the bus landed before the speed
dropped below 50... Makes sense? Or am I wide off the mark?



Re: [silk] Speed - The Movie

2008-11-30 Thread Alok G. Singh
Gautam John wrote:

 ... there is a scene where the bus jumps over a break in a bridge
 [2]. My question is what speed would the bomb/speedometer register
 when the bus is airborne?  I'm thinking the bomb should have gone off
 when in the air...

AFAIK, the speedometer relies on wheel/transmission revolutions so, a
foot on the gas pedal should be enough to ensure that the speed does not
drop below 50 mph.

There is of course the problem that the jump is physically impossible.
-- 
Alok

rcw liiwi: printk(CPU0 on fire\n);