Re: [silk] Long Now's Manual for Civilization Lists

2014-09-30 Thread skn


On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 07:57 AM, Charles Haynes wrote:
 I wonder how many of the books will be in Chinese. They say they aren't
 limiting nominations to english, but selection bias and subsequent
 voting
 bias will be huge.
 
 -- Charles

Very true indeed! BTW if you are interested in Chinese Sci-fi, do check
this Kickstarter project out
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/clarkesworld/clarkesworld-chinese-science-fiction-translation-p

-skn-

 
 On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:55 PM, skn s...@skn.fastmail.fm wrote:
 
  Long Now Foundation has a very interesting project - Manual for
  Civilization Lists, roughly 3500 books most essential to sustain or
  rebuild civilization.
  http://blog.longnow.org/02014/02/06/manual-for-civilization-begins/
 
  The recent blog post on the subject has list from David Brin, Bruce
  Sterling  Daniel Suarez
 
  http://blog.longnow.org/02014/09/29/science-fiction-authors-manual-for-civilization/
 
 



Re: [silk] Long Now's Manual for Civilization Lists

2014-09-30 Thread Heather Madrone
Selection bias cuts a number of ways. While there are a lot of 
thoughtful selection in the lists I skimmed, there was a notable bias 
towards traditionally male skills. I saw one book on sewing and none on 
spinning, weaving, knitting, dyeing, or felting. I saw nothing on 
education, childcare, eldercare, or nursing. Food preservation and 
preparation seemed underrepresented as well.


On the other hand, the books that were included seemed like a good 
collection to have on the shelf right next to your Real Goods catalog.


--hmm

Charles Haynes mailto:charles.hay...@gmail.com
September 29, 2014 at 10:57 PM September 29, 2014
I wonder how many of the books will be in Chinese. They say they aren't
limiting nominations to english, but selection bias and subsequent 
voting

bias will be huge.

-- Charles


skn mailto:s...@skn.fastmail.fm
September 29, 2014 at 9:55 PM September 29, 2014
Long Now Foundation has a very interesting project - Manual for
Civilization Lists, roughly 3500 books most essential to sustain or
rebuild civilization.
http://blog.longnow.org/02014/02/06/manual-for-civilization-begins/

The recent blog post on the subject has list from David Brin, Bruce
Sterling  Daniel Suarez
http://blog.longnow.org/02014/09/29/science-fiction-authors-manual-for-civilization/







Re: [silk] Long Now's Manual for Civilization Lists

2014-09-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Hm I thought heinlein had it figured out

 human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a 
hog, con a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build 
a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, 
act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a 
computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly.  
Specialization is for insects. 






On 30 September 2014 8:16:50 pm Heather Madrone heat...@madrone.com wrote:


Selection bias cuts a number of ways. While there are a lot of
thoughtful selection in the lists I skimmed, there was a notable bias
towards traditionally male skills. I saw one book on sewing and none on
spinning, weaving, knitting, dyeing, or felting. I saw nothing on
education, childcare, eldercare, or nursing. Food preservation and
preparation seemed underrepresented as well.

On the other hand, the books that were included seemed like a good
collection to have on the shelf right next to your Real Goods catalog.

--hmm
 Charles Haynes mailto:charles.hay...@gmail.com
 September 29, 2014 at 10:57 PM September 29, 2014
 I wonder how many of the books will be in Chinese. They say they aren't
 limiting nominations to english, but selection bias and subsequent
 voting
 bias will be huge.

 -- Charles


 skn mailto:s...@skn.fastmail.fm
 September 29, 2014 at 9:55 PM September 29, 2014
 Long Now Foundation has a very interesting project - Manual for
 Civilization Lists, roughly 3500 books most essential to sustain or
 rebuild civilization.
 http://blog.longnow.org/02014/02/06/manual-for-civilization-begins/

 The recent blog post on the subject has list from David Brin, Bruce
 Sterling  Daniel Suarez
 
http://blog.longnow.org/02014/09/29/science-fiction-authors-manual-for-civilization/



 







[silk] Long Now's Manual for Civilization Lists

2014-09-29 Thread skn
Long Now Foundation has a very interesting project - Manual for
Civilization Lists, roughly 3500 books most essential to sustain or
rebuild civilization.
http://blog.longnow.org/02014/02/06/manual-for-civilization-begins/

The recent blog post on the subject has list from David Brin, Bruce
Sterling  Daniel Suarez
http://blog.longnow.org/02014/09/29/science-fiction-authors-manual-for-civilization/



Re: [silk] Long Now's Manual for Civilization Lists

2014-09-29 Thread Charles Haynes
I wonder how many of the books will be in Chinese. They say they aren't
limiting nominations to english, but selection bias and subsequent voting
bias will be huge.

-- Charles

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 2:55 PM, skn s...@skn.fastmail.fm wrote:

 Long Now Foundation has a very interesting project - Manual for
 Civilization Lists, roughly 3500 books most essential to sustain or
 rebuild civilization.
 http://blog.longnow.org/02014/02/06/manual-for-civilization-begins/

 The recent blog post on the subject has list from David Brin, Bruce
 Sterling  Daniel Suarez

 http://blog.longnow.org/02014/09/29/science-fiction-authors-manual-for-civilization/




Re: [silk] long

2008-02-09 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 07:44:38AM +0530, Hassath wrote:

 Or does someone know it differently?

Zucker. Сахар. Saccharose. 

-- 
Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org
__
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE



Re: [silk] long

2008-02-08 Thread Ramjee Swaminathan
Yes, :-) And nice to note the 'Telegu' as opposed to Telugu. :-))

Actually it was something like:  stones the colour of frankincense,
sweeter than figs or honey [1] - referring to Khand; this was in
326BC. Arthatshasthra of the same time also refers to the whole gamut
of products of sugarcane.

[1] JB Hutchinson (ed), Diversity and Change in the Indian
Subcontinent, Cambridge University Press, 1974.

__r.

On 2/8/08, Radhika, Y. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 in Telegu, it is Panchadara and chakkira. my understanding is that there is
 a greek account in Alexander's time that refers to the sugarcane
 as producing honey without bees.

 On Feb 8, 2008 8:35 AM, Ramjee Swaminathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
snip



Re: [silk] long

2008-02-08 Thread Radhika, Y.
in Telegu, it is Panchadara and chakkira. my understanding is that there is
a greek account in Alexander's time that refers to the sugarcane
as producing honey without bees.

On Feb 8, 2008 8:35 AM, Ramjee Swaminathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 :-) the rambler strikes again. Probable reason: too much sugar.

 On 2/7/08, Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 snip
   (but again, not in all languages - in Malayalam and Tamil, they are
   respectively called charkarai and chakkara, AFAIK - there are also
   cheenchakkari, chenjeeni etc in colloquial refs) .
 
  BTW, in Malayalam, cc sugar is usually called pan[cha]sara. I've only
  heard the charkarai form used for gur or perhaps palm sugar. Is there
  a similar distinction in Tamil?
 
 Thanks! I forgot this pansarai funda. We used to have Nair neighbours
 and they used to tell us that from region to region there were
 different and slightly varying references to sugar and that anyway
 only after moving to Madras they even 'saw' white sugar!

 vella chakkarai - pounded and granulated gud/jaggery
 panam-khandu - palm khand
 panam-cheeni :-) - palm sugar
 panai-vellam - palm jaggery
 etc etc...

   There are some recorded instances of cc sugar being imported into
   western india from china (during circa 1-200 ad)
 
  Fascinating. I did not know that. What route did it take?
 
 When there were no wars in the NE, NW and N of India, there was very
 little that was imported from china as there was no need to import
 sugar as it was never an issue of scarcity then. During wars, however,
 the sea routes were used (malacca straits, ceylon, round kanyakumari
 and onwards to either musiri or kollam or n other ports near what are
 now famous as Kanhoji Angre's (one of the greatest naval strategists
 and admirals) port bastions.

 In any case, the shipments apparently werent huge or anything, White
 crystalline sugar must have been a 'delicacy'  considering everything
 (my take) - the echoes of a similar context are found in paperback
 'pioneer' recap literature of North America, such as that of Laura
 Ingalls Wilder. That white sugar be used for 'company' and as a status
 symbol.

   * Om Prakash - Food and drinks in ancient India
 
  I think I'll try to find a copy of that. Speaking of which, I should go
  to the book fair in Delhi before it ends.
 
 Good luck and warm regards:

 __r.




Re: [silk] long

2008-02-08 Thread Ramjee Swaminathan
:-) the rambler strikes again. Probable reason: too much sugar.

On 2/7/08, Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
  (but again, not in all languages - in Malayalam and Tamil, they are
  respectively called charkarai and chakkara, AFAIK - there are also
  cheenchakkari, chenjeeni etc in colloquial refs) .

 BTW, in Malayalam, cc sugar is usually called pan[cha]sara. I've only
 heard the charkarai form used for gur or perhaps palm sugar. Is there
 a similar distinction in Tamil?

Thanks! I forgot this pansarai funda. We used to have Nair neighbours
and they used to tell us that from region to region there were
different and slightly varying references to sugar and that anyway
only after moving to Madras they even 'saw' white sugar!

vella chakkarai - pounded and granulated gud/jaggery
panam-khandu - palm khand
panam-cheeni :-) - palm sugar
panai-vellam - palm jaggery
etc etc...

  There are some recorded instances of cc sugar being imported into
  western india from china (during circa 1-200 ad)

 Fascinating. I did not know that. What route did it take?

When there were no wars in the NE, NW and N of India, there was very
little that was imported from china as there was no need to import
sugar as it was never an issue of scarcity then. During wars, however,
the sea routes were used (malacca straits, ceylon, round kanyakumari
and onwards to either musiri or kollam or n other ports near what are
now famous as Kanhoji Angre's (one of the greatest naval strategists
and admirals) port bastions.

In any case, the shipments apparently werent huge or anything, White
crystalline sugar must have been a 'delicacy'  considering everything
(my take) - the echoes of a similar context are found in paperback
'pioneer' recap literature of North America, such as that of Laura
Ingalls Wilder. That white sugar be used for 'company' and as a status
symbol.

  * Om Prakash - Food and drinks in ancient India

 I think I'll try to find a copy of that. Speaking of which, I should go
 to the book fair in Delhi before it ends.

Good luck and warm regards:

__r.



Re: [silk] long

2008-02-08 Thread Deepa Mohan
On Feb 8, 2008 10:53 PM, Ramjee Swaminathan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes, :-) And nice to note the 'Telegu' as opposed to Telugu. :-))

 Actually it was something like:  stones the colour of frankincense,
 sweeter than figs or honey [1] - referring to Khand; this was in
 326BC. Arthatshasthra of the same time also refers to the whole gamut
 of products of sugarcane.

I also thought of  gulkhand which seems to be a popular sweet in
many parts of India. Was this of Mughal, or Indian origin? I never
liked it, and could not understand my grandmother's need to dunk rose
petals in sugar syrup!...

And khand as in piece... khandam, I think, also denotes region
in Sanskrit and its derviatives,as in Bundelkhandand so on.

Words are just amazing, the way they lead you into further drifts!

Deepa.

 [1] JB Hutchinson (ed), Diversity and Change in the Indian
 Subcontinent, Cambridge University Press, 1974.

 __r.

 On 2/8/08, Radhika, Y. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  in Telegu, it is Panchadara and chakkira. my understanding is that there is
  a greek account in Alexander's time that refers to the sugarcane
  as producing honey without bees.
 
  On Feb 8, 2008 8:35 AM, Ramjee Swaminathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 snip





Re: [silk] long

2008-02-08 Thread Hassath
On Feb 8, 2008 11:26 PM, Deepa Mohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I also thought of  gulkhand which seems to be a popular sweet in
 many parts of India. Was this of Mughal, or Indian origin? I never
 liked it, and could not understand my grandmother's need to dunk rose
 petals in sugar syrup!...

It's gul*kand*, not gulkhand. I suspect it's of Mughal origin, because
of 'gul' - which means flower or rose, I think, in Arabic.
And yes, Deepa, even I never liked it- notwithstanding childhood
memories of nice neighbours offering it to us. :-)
-- 
- Hassath



Re: [silk] long

2008-02-08 Thread Hassath
On Feb 8, 2008 9:41 PM, Ramjee Swaminathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 misri or chini - white crystalline sugar

 It would be of interest to note that, of all the above products, misri
 or white crystalline sugar is a very late entrant to the scene of
 Indian cuisine in a major way and has quickly become predominant.

In UP and Delhi, I believe misri refers not to the everyday small
crystalline sugar, but the bigger chunks. And in some parts of Kerala,
I've heard the same thing referred to as 'kalkandam'.

Chini is the white crystalline sugar which is now predominant.

Or does someone know it differently?

-- 
- Hassath



Re: [silk] long

2008-02-08 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2008-02-08 08:11:07 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 misri or chini - white crystalline sugar

If chini is Chinese, is misri Egyptian?

-- ams



Re: [silk] long

2008-02-07 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:

| BTW, in Malayalam, cc sugar is usually called pan[cha]sara. I've only
| heard the charkarai form used for gur or perhaps palm sugar. Is there
| a similar distinction in Tamil?

Speaking of which, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Molasses_Disaster
makes a gory read

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHq8ZJXQZpNTcrCzMRAk4GAKCFdbVfc1jEy0TxQ6sYBaUEXMgGWQCgoJ1m
NOFrVVDKJe6A8CE1RziTErQ=
=5wck
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [silk] long

2008-02-07 Thread Deepa Mohan
BTW, in Malayalam, cc sugar is usually called pan[cha]sara. I've only
 | heard the charkarai form used for gur or perhaps palm sugar. Is there
 | a similar distinction in Tamil?

No...gur is called vellam...and palm sugar is panam kalkandu.
(kalkandu is sugar candy ...the kind that comes in crystals and is
offered when one enters a wedding hall.)

Deepa.

On Feb 8, 2008 8:32 AM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:

 | BTW, in Malayalam, cc sugar is usually called pan[cha]sara. I've only
 | heard the charkarai form used for gur or perhaps palm sugar. Is there
 | a similar distinction in Tamil?

 Speaking of which, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Molasses_Disaster
 makes a gory read

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFHq8ZJXQZpNTcrCzMRAk4GAKCFdbVfc1jEy0TxQ6sYBaUEXMgGWQCgoJ1m
 NOFrVVDKJe6A8CE1RziTErQ=
 =5wck
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-





Re: [silk] long

2008-02-07 Thread Gautam John
On Feb 8, 2008 9:05 AM, Deepa Mohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 No...gur is called vellam...and palm sugar is panam kalkandu.

There is also this liquid palm sugar syrup, in Kerala, that is called paani.



Re: [silk] long

2008-02-07 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2008-02-08 08:32:33 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Molasses_Disaster

I am a terrible human being, because I find that description very funny.

   «The collapse unleashed an immense wave of molasses between 8 and 15
ft (2.5 to 4.5 m) high, moving at 35 mph (56 km/h) and exerting a
pressure of 2 ton/ft² (200 kPa).»

Did Wikipedia exist in 1919? I can just imagine a bunch of Wikipedia
editors running from the wave while arguing about the best way to
measure its velocity.

-- ams