Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Ythogtha]

> On 20.09.2017 16:42, Ythogtha wrote:
> >>> An extra sentence in a README costs nothing, and might save someone
> >>> some time and headache.
> >>
> >> But was that an actual solution?
> >>
> >> That is, I might not have noticed that, but was increasing the swap
> >> space the solution?
> >>
> >> I built it fine in 5GB VM, using 4 make jobs.
> >>
> >> And we have many more scripts that might be hungry, like qt5 or 
> >> LibreOffice.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if they all should be updated this way.
> >
> > That's the question...
> > Wasn't the solution to use multiple jobs ?
> > -j2 or higher does the trick, but if -j1 it fails ?
> >
> > It seems to me that was the real solution wasn't it ?
> >
> > And couldn't this be handled in the SlackBuild directly ?
> 
> Isn't that already done?
> https://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/commit/?id=e9952e154
> 
> Johannes

Short answer : yes.
So is there any other build problem there ?
Doesn't setting -j2 solve every build problem ?

-- 
Arnaud 
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[B Watson]

On 9/20/17, Andrzej Telszewski  wrote:
> And we have many more scripts that might be hungry, like qt5 or
> LibreOffice.
>
> I'm not sure if they all should be updated this way.

Up to the individual maintainers. If it were up for voting, I'd vote yes.
What possible reason is there for not wanting to do this? (I honestly
can't see one. Even laziness shouldn't apply, we're talking about adding
one line to a file that already exists)

Anything that takes many hours to complete, and stands a chance of failing
because of missing information on the builder's part (like "this needs
2GB of RAM"), information that the maintainer *has* but hasn't bothered
to share with the builder... that leads to wasted time and resources, and
annoys the builder (who is your audience... the person you're ultimately
doing this for in the first place).

Me, I put this in mame's README:

"This build requires around 2GB of storage in /tmp (or whatever you set
TMP to in the environment)."

...to be fully honest, I put it there because I myself will forget that
fact, and try to build it on my laptop where /tmp is a tmpfs that never
grows past 1GB. After shooting myself in the foot several times, I've
put a warning label on the gun (which will also benefit others).

I also went to some trouble with the mame build to reduce the build
time and amount of memory used, by using the ld.gold linker. qt5 I think
already does this (autodetects it). LibreOffice might not benefit much
from it since it's got so much Java code... haven't looked at webkit2gtk,
maybe it could benefit from this too? (possibly as simple as adding
LDFLAGS="-fuse-ld=gold" to the make command)
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Johannes Schöpfer]

On 20.09.2017 16:42, Ythogtha wrote:

An extra sentence in a README costs nothing, and might save someone
some time and headache.


But was that an actual solution?

That is, I might not have noticed that, but was increasing the swap
space the solution?

I built it fine in 5GB VM, using 4 make jobs.

And we have many more scripts that might be hungry, like qt5 or LibreOffice.

I'm not sure if they all should be updated this way.


That's the question...
Wasn't the solution to use multiple jobs ?
-j2 or higher does the trick, but if -j1 it fails ?

It seems to me that was the real solution wasn't it ?

And couldn't this be handled in the SlackBuild directly ?


Isn't that already done?
https://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/commit/?id=e9952e154

Johannes
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Ythogtha]

> > An extra sentence in a README costs nothing, and might save someone
> > some time and headache.
> 
> But was that an actual solution?
> 
> That is, I might not have noticed that, but was increasing the swap 
> space the solution?
> 
> I built it fine in 5GB VM, using 4 make jobs.
> 
> And we have many more scripts that might be hungry, like qt5 or LibreOffice.
> 
> I'm not sure if they all should be updated this way.

That's the question...
Wasn't the solution to use multiple jobs ?
-j2 or higher does the trick, but if -j1 it fails ?

It seems to me that was the real solution wasn't it ?

And couldn't this be handled in the SlackBuild directly ? Checking for NUMJOBS
and setting 2 jobs if there are only one asked for, regardless of user
preferences.

-- 
Yth 
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Andrzej Telszewski]

On 20/09/17 16:08, B Watson wrote:

On 9/20/17, Matteo Bernardini  wrote:

2017-09-20 14:02 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Telszewski:

I think webkit2gtk README should not be updated with the adding more swap
space tip.

it has been just a suggestion and in Willy's case it has been useful,
but I agree that it's something that maybe would fit better between
the FAQs (as it applies to multiple SlackBuilds).

Why can't it be mentioned in both places, the README as specific advice
for someone about to build webkit2gtk, and the FAQ as general advice
for multiple builds?

The issue here seems to be that it takes several hours for the build
to fail, and it took all the people on this thread several days to 100%
diagnose the problem. That represents enough computer cycles and human
labour that it's worth passing on to the next guy who might need to know
it. An extra sentence in a README costs nothing, and might save someone
some time and headache.


But was that an actual solution?

That is, I might not have noticed that, but was increasing the swap 
space the solution?


I built it fine in 5GB VM, using 4 make jobs.

And we have many more scripts that might be hungry, like qt5 or LibreOffice.

I'm not sure if they all should be updated this way.

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[B Watson]

On 9/20/17, Matteo Bernardini  wrote:
> 2017-09-20 14:02 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Telszewski :
>> I think webkit2gtk README should not be updated with the adding more swap
>> space tip.
>
> it has been just a suggestion and in Willy's case it has been useful,
> but I agree that it's something that maybe would fit better between
> the FAQs (as it applies to multiple SlackBuilds).

Why can't it be mentioned in both places, the README as specific advice
for someone about to build webkit2gtk, and the FAQ as general advice
for multiple builds?

The issue here seems to be that it takes several hours for the build
to fail, and it took all the people on this thread several days to 100%
diagnose the problem. That represents enough computer cycles and human
labour that it's worth passing on to the next guy who might need to know
it. An extra sentence in a README costs nothing, and might save someone
some time and headache.
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Matteo Bernardini]

2017-09-20 14:02 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Telszewski :
> I think webkit2gtk README should not be updated with the adding more swap
> space tip.

it has been just a suggestion and in Willy's case it has been useful,
but I agree that it's something that maybe would fit better between
the FAQs (as it applies to multiple SlackBuilds).

Matteo
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Andrzej Telszewski]

Hi,

I think webkit2gtk README should not be updated with the adding more 
swap space tip.


--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Habs]

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:17:30 +0200
Andrzej Telszewski  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've just built for testing (I don't need the package) with slackrepo:
> 
> env MAKEFLAGS=' -j4 ' nice -n 5 bash ./webkit2gtk.SlackBuild
> Build time 187 min, peak load 6.69, peak memory 3674M, peak tmp 1222M
> Built ok:  webkit2gtk-2.18.0-x86_64-1_sbo.txz
> 


That did the trick. \m/ Before messing with swap, I tried this first and
the machine romped through it with no [resource] issues that I could
see. Thank you for this ... and to all for the other contributions.

I've realised I know very little comparatively :-)

Regards
Habs
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Jason Graham]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Andrzej Telszewski 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've just built for testing (I don't need the package) with slackrepo:
>
> env MAKEFLAGS=' -j4 ' nice -n 5 bash ./webkit2gtk.SlackBuild
> Build time 187 min, peak load 6.69, peak memory 3674M, peak tmp 1222M
> Built ok:  webkit2gtk-2.18.0-x86_64-1_sbo.txz
>
>
Thanks Andrzej for testing and capturing resource info. This confirms my
suspicions with regard to resource requirements for the build; they aren't
insignificant.

Best,
J
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Ekin Akoglu]

Hi,

I don't think this is a resource issue. My system is with 16 GB RAM and 
8 GB swap space, however, the build fails at 76% with a similar error 
(sorry but I didn't record the exact error so that I could post here).


Best,

Ekin


On 19/09/17 11:59, Habs wrote:

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:44:02 +0700
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo  wrote:


On 09/19/2017 04:49 AM, Jason Graham wrote:

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Habs 
wrote:

Ive started the build off again after clearing it out.
As I said, I'm simple minded ;-)  so please forgive me, but it
puzzles me that the error message is related to space - is that
disk resource and,or ram resources  ...and more over, why would
the previous version build fine on the exact same machine _without
issue_ but not this updated version...what is it doing different I
wonder (all said rhetorically speaking).

  

The missing header file issue between the two -j values is indeed a
bit baffling (if it were happening with anything other than -j1
that would seem to make more sense).

With regard to the resource requirements for the build, passing
-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=1 will show how involved building this
package is. There are at least 100 different include directories
used during compilation of each file so header files are scattered
all throughout the source tree. I'd say a similar number of object
files for each library it creates during linking which seem to be
the most demanding with regard to memory.

Just a short FYI that i'm able to build webkit2gtk on my
Slackware64-14.2 VM with 1 vCPU and 2 GB of RAM with 10 additional
swap space (total of 12 GB) using commands that Ponce stated in LQ
thread

fallocate -l 10G /temp-swap
chmod 0600 /temp-swap
mkswap /temp-swap
swapon /temp-swap

webkit2gtk:
   MD5SUM check for webkitgtk-2.18.0.tar.xz ... OK
   Building package webkit2gtk-2.18.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz ... OK
   Installing package webkit2gtk-2.18.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz ... OK

free -h
   totalusedfreeshared  buff/cache   available
Mem:  1.9G 22M 123M4K1.8G1.6G
Swap: 12G  22M 12G



Can I just have clarified please re:


fallocate -l 10G /temp-swap
chmod 0600 /temp-swap
mkswap /temp-swap
swapon /temp-swap

... that be done without messing up the swap already setup (in fstab)
i.e. it is a temporary allocation for the build process that can then
be deallocated etc  (hopefully you get what I mean) ?

The machine I'm using already has 8b swap (I believe) and 4Gb RAM.
I will track down the thread on LQ and try it out...but it is getting a
bit silly when a 4GB quad-core machine that is doing nothing else,
struggles or conks out due to resource issues etc :-)


Thank you again all for the input...maybe I am learning something too!

Habs




___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Habs]

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:56:16 +0200
Matteo Bernardini  wrote:

> 2017-09-18 21:52 GMT+02:00 Habs :
> > From reading other posts, I will have a go with the -j switch and
> > see what gives, but it seems remote.  Not sure what else to do, or
> > I can do.  The previous version builds fine, so I can use that and
> > not upgrade any more, until I understand what's going on (hmmm).  
> 
> I was able to reproduce your error when building webkit2gtk with a
> single make job (the default), while it went fine if two jobs or more
> were used.
> 
> you can try adding a line like this to the SlackBuild (so that it
> defaults to use at least two jobs)
> 
> --- webkit2gtk.SlackBuild.orig  2017-09-16 02:20:30.0 +0200
> +++ webkit2gtk.SlackBuild   2017-09-19 10:54:00.493180645 +0200
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
>LIBDIRSUFFIX=""
>  fi
> 
> +MAKEFLAGS=${MAKEFLAGS:--j2}
> +
>  set -eu
> 
>  rm -rf $PKG
> 
> or you can try also passing a MAKEFLAGS=-j${n} (with n >= 2) to the
> SlackBuild to use multiple make jobs.
> 
> Matteo
> ___
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
> 

Thank you will give a few things a try until it builds or I give up due
to lack of brain capacity (and frustration)   :-)
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Habs]

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:44:02 +0700
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo  wrote:

> On 09/19/2017 04:49 AM, Jason Graham wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Habs 
> > wrote: 
> >>
> >> Ive started the build off again after clearing it out.
> >> As I said, I'm simple minded ;-)  so please forgive me, but it
> >> puzzles me that the error message is related to space - is that
> >> disk resource and,or ram resources  ...and more over, why would
> >> the previous version build fine on the exact same machine _without
> >> issue_ but not this updated version...what is it doing different I
> >> wonder (all said rhetorically speaking).
> >>
> >>  
> > The missing header file issue between the two -j values is indeed a
> > bit baffling (if it were happening with anything other than -j1
> > that would seem to make more sense).
> > 
> > With regard to the resource requirements for the build, passing
> > -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=1 will show how involved building this
> > package is. There are at least 100 different include directories
> > used during compilation of each file so header files are scattered
> > all throughout the source tree. I'd say a similar number of object
> > files for each library it creates during linking which seem to be
> > the most demanding with regard to memory.  
> 
> Just a short FYI that i'm able to build webkit2gtk on my
> Slackware64-14.2 VM with 1 vCPU and 2 GB of RAM with 10 additional
> swap space (total of 12 GB) using commands that Ponce stated in LQ
> thread
> 
> fallocate -l 10G /temp-swap
> chmod 0600 /temp-swap
> mkswap /temp-swap
> swapon /temp-swap
> 
> webkit2gtk:
>   MD5SUM check for webkitgtk-2.18.0.tar.xz ... OK
>   Building package webkit2gtk-2.18.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz ... OK
>   Installing package webkit2gtk-2.18.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz ... OK
> 
> free -h
>   totalusedfreeshared  buff/cache   available
> Mem:  1.9G 22M 123M4K1.8G1.6G
> Swap: 12G  22M 12G
> 
> 

Can I just have clarified please re:

> fallocate -l 10G /temp-swap
> chmod 0600 /temp-swap
> mkswap /temp-swap
> swapon /temp-swap

... that be done without messing up the swap already setup (in fstab)
i.e. it is a temporary allocation for the build process that can then
be deallocated etc  (hopefully you get what I mean) ?

The machine I'm using already has 8b swap (I believe) and 4Gb RAM.
I will track down the thread on LQ and try it out...but it is getting a
bit silly when a 4GB quad-core machine that is doing nothing else,
struggles or conks out due to resource issues etc :-)


Thank you again all for the input...maybe I am learning something too!

Habs




___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Matteo Bernardini]

2017-09-18 21:52 GMT+02:00 Habs :
> From reading other posts, I will have a go with the -j switch and see
> what gives, but it seems remote.  Not sure what else to do, or I can
> do.  The previous version builds fine, so I can use that and not
> upgrade any more, until I understand what's going on (hmmm).

I was able to reproduce your error when building webkit2gtk with a
single make job (the default), while it went fine if two jobs or more
were used.

you can try adding a line like this to the SlackBuild (so that it
defaults to use at least two jobs)

--- webkit2gtk.SlackBuild.orig  2017-09-16 02:20:30.0 +0200
+++ webkit2gtk.SlackBuild   2017-09-19 10:54:00.493180645 +0200
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
   LIBDIRSUFFIX=""
 fi

+MAKEFLAGS=${MAKEFLAGS:--j2}
+
 set -eu

 rm -rf $PKG

or you can try also passing a MAKEFLAGS=-j${n} (with n >= 2) to the
SlackBuild to use multiple make jobs.

Matteo
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Willy Sudiarto Raharjo]

On 09/19/2017 04:49 AM, Jason Graham wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Habs  wrote:
> 
>>
>> Ive started the build off again after clearing it out.
>> As I said, I'm simple minded ;-)  so please forgive me, but it puzzles
>> me that the error message is related to space - is that disk resource
>> and,or ram resources  ...and more over, why would the previous version
>> build fine on the exact same machine _without issue_ but not this
>> updated version...what is it doing different I wonder (all said
>> rhetorically speaking).
>>
>>
> The missing header file issue between the two -j values is indeed a bit
> baffling (if it were happening with anything other than -j1 that would seem
> to make more sense).
> 
> With regard to the resource requirements for the build, passing
> -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=1 will show how involved building this package is.
> There are at least 100 different include directories used during
> compilation of each file so header files are scattered all throughout the
> source tree. I'd say a similar number of object files for each library it
> creates during linking which seem to be the most demanding with regard to
> memory.

Just a short FYI that i'm able to build webkit2gtk on my
Slackware64-14.2 VM with 1 vCPU and 2 GB of RAM with 10 additional swap
space (total of 12 GB) using commands that Ponce stated in LQ thread

fallocate -l 10G /temp-swap
chmod 0600 /temp-swap
mkswap /temp-swap
swapon /temp-swap

webkit2gtk:
  MD5SUM check for webkitgtk-2.18.0.tar.xz ... OK
  Building package webkit2gtk-2.18.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz ... OK
  Installing package webkit2gtk-2.18.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz ... OK

free -h
  totalusedfreeshared  buff/cache   available
Mem:  1.9G 22M 123M4K1.8G1.6G
Swap: 12G  22M 12G


-- 
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Jason Graham]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Habs  wrote:

>
> Ive started the build off again after clearing it out.
> As I said, I'm simple minded ;-)  so please forgive me, but it puzzles
> me that the error message is related to space - is that disk resource
> and,or ram resources  ...and more over, why would the previous version
> build fine on the exact same machine _without issue_ but not this
> updated version...what is it doing different I wonder (all said
> rhetorically speaking).
>
>
The missing header file issue between the two -j values is indeed a bit
baffling (if it were happening with anything other than -j1 that would seem
to make more sense).

With regard to the resource requirements for the build, passing
-DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=1 will show how involved building this package is.
There are at least 100 different include directories used during
compilation of each file so header files are scattered all throughout the
source tree. I'd say a similar number of object files for each library it
creates during linking which seem to be the most demanding with regard to
memory.

Best,
Jason
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Habs]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:20:21 +0100
Habs  wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:02:48 -0400
> Jason Graham  wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Ythogtha  wrote:
> >   
> > > > > I got the same error as Habs on a stable install.
> > > >
> > > > I was convinced by Matteo and David that webkit2gtk build fine
> > > > on stable and current for both arch, BUT it requires a LOT of
> > > > resources, so i cancelled my revert and update README instead to
> > > > make additional SWAP space if you have small amount of memory
> > > > installed.
> > >
> > > After the package is created, the temporary build
> > > directory takes 1.1Gb.
> > > It's not that big, but it is also true that the build takes up a
> > > lot of resources during compilation.
> > > My computer only has 8Gb of RAM. Maybe using multiple jobs
> > > may be a problem, I use -j2, and my computer is on its knees (or
> > > chips, or circuits, don't know... ^^) when building, but it builds
> > > fine.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > I had a similar experience. I first tried with -j8 on a VM and the
> > compilation finished (or at least the cmake progress showed 100%)
> > but it didn't proceed from there. There were 4Gb of ram allocated
> > to this VM so I suppose it was resource constrained based on other
> > folks' findings. It stalled for quite some time (~30min) before I
> > killed the job.
> > 
> > So I tried again with -j1 and it failed in the same location has
> > Habs.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Jason  
> 
> Ive started the build off again after clearing it out.
> As I said, I'm simple minded ;-)  so please forgive me, but it puzzles
> me that the error message is related to space - is that disk resource
> and,or ram resources  ...and more over, why would the previous version
> build fine on the exact same machine _without issue_ but not this
> updated version...what is it doing different I wonder (all said
> rhetorically speaking).
> 
> I will see what happens in the early hours  :-)
> 
> Thanks again everyone
> Habs

Well, it failed again - both machines (one Intel one AMD tower) - as
detailed previously.  They were doing nothing else other than building
this.

The machines are by no means gutsy, but still...4Gb RAM, 500Gb disk
space etc. Swap wasnt overly affected from what I could see, which
just leaves memory etc ...why would that cause it to conk I dunno.

If it is  a resources issue for building, producing the error at the
same place each time, then it seems like its getting to the point of
needing a Cray computer to do this. Ridiculous.  :-)

>From reading other posts, I will have a go with the -j switch and see
what gives, but it seems remote.  Not sure what else to do, or I can
do.  The previous version builds fine, so I can use that and not
upgrade any more, until I understand what's going on (hmmm).

Thank you, good night (as it is for me) to all.
Habs

---
[ 76%] Building CXX object
Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o
In file included
from 
/tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp:21:0:
/tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.h:23:40:
fatal error: WebCore/HysteresisActivity.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/build.make:51125: recipe for
target
'Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o'
 failed
make[2]: ***
[Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o]
Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1065: recipe for target
'Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/all' failed
make[1]: *** [Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:149: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

---
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Habs]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:02:48 -0400
Jason Graham  wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Ythogtha  wrote:
> 
> > > > I got the same error as Habs on a stable install.  
> > >
> > > I was convinced by Matteo and David that webkit2gtk build fine on
> > > stable and current for both arch, BUT it requires a LOT of
> > > resources, so i cancelled my revert and update README instead to
> > > make additional SWAP space if you have small amount of memory
> > > installed.  
> >
> > After the package is created, the temporary build directory
> > takes 1.1Gb.
> > It's not that big, but it is also true that the build takes up a
> > lot of resources during compilation.
> > My computer only has 8Gb of RAM. Maybe using multiple jobs
> > may be a problem, I use -j2, and my computer is on its knees (or
> > chips, or circuits, don't know... ^^) when building, but it builds
> > fine.
> >
> >
> >  
> 
> I had a similar experience. I first tried with -j8 on a VM and the
> compilation finished (or at least the cmake progress showed 100%) but
> it didn't proceed from there. There were 4Gb of ram allocated to this
> VM so I suppose it was resource constrained based on other folks'
> findings. It stalled for quite some time (~30min) before I killed the
> job.
> 
> So I tried again with -j1 and it failed in the same location has Habs.
> 
> Best,
> Jason

Ive started the build off again after clearing it out.
As I said, I'm simple minded ;-)  so please forgive me, but it puzzles
me that the error message is related to space - is that disk resource
and,or ram resources  ...and more over, why would the previous version
build fine on the exact same machine _without issue_ but not this
updated version...what is it doing different I wonder (all said
rhetorically speaking).

I will see what happens in the early hours  :-)

Thanks again everyone
Habs
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Jason Graham]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Ythogtha  wrote:

> > > I got the same error as Habs on a stable install.
> >
> > I was convinced by Matteo and David that webkit2gtk build fine on stable
> > and current for both arch, BUT it requires a LOT of resources, so i
> > cancelled my revert and update README instead to make additional SWAP
> > space if you have small amount of memory installed.
>
> After the package is created, the temporary build directory takes
> 1.1Gb.
> It's not that big, but it is also true that the build takes up a lot of
> resources during compilation.
> My computer only has 8Gb of RAM. Maybe using multiple jobs may be a
> problem, I use -j2, and my computer is on its knees (or chips, or circuits,
> don't know... ^^) when building, but it builds fine.
>
>
>

I had a similar experience. I first tried with -j8 on a VM and the
compilation finished (or at least the cmake progress showed 100%) but it
didn't proceed from there. There were 4Gb of ram allocated to this VM so I
suppose it was resource constrained based on other folks' findings. It
stalled for quite some time (~30min) before I killed the job.

So I tried again with -j1 and it failed in the same location has Habs.

Best,
Jason
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Glenn Becker]

I would be okay with doing other stuff while compiling but this thing
[infamously? I've Googled and found lots of complaints] tales a loong time.

I ain't rich, so the referenced box is my 'new' laptop, and it gives me a
little chill when I check in on the cmake % done notifications and have to
stifle yells of "ONLY X PERCENT??"

:(



On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Ythogtha  wrote:

> > > I got the same error as Habs on a stable install.
> >
> > I was convinced by Matteo and David that webkit2gtk build fine on stable
> > and current for both arch, BUT it requires a LOT of resources, so i
> > cancelled my revert and update README instead to make additional SWAP
> > space if you have small amount of memory installed.
>
> After the package is created, the temporary build directory takes
> 1.1Gb.
> It's not that big, but it is also true that the build takes up a lot of
> resources during compilation.
> My computer only has 8Gb of RAM. Maybe using multiple jobs may be a
> problem, I use -j2, and my computer is on its knees (or chips, or circuits,
> don't know... ^^) when building, but it builds fine.
>
> --
> Arnaud 
> ___
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Ythogtha]

> > I got the same error as Habs on a stable install.
> 
> I was convinced by Matteo and David that webkit2gtk build fine on stable
> and current for both arch, BUT it requires a LOT of resources, so i
> cancelled my revert and update README instead to make additional SWAP
> space if you have small amount of memory installed.

After the package is created, the temporary build directory takes 1.1Gb.
It's not that big, but it is also true that the build takes up a lot of
resources during compilation.
My computer only has 8Gb of RAM. Maybe using multiple jobs may be a
problem, I use -j2, and my computer is on its knees (or chips, or circuits,
don't know... ^^) when building, but it builds fine.

-- 
Arnaud 
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Glenn Becker]

OK. I will try again. For what it is worth, the machine I tried building it
on has 16 gig o RAM. Granted it's an older core i5 processor. :/ Still,
curious.




On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo <
will...@slackbuilds.org> wrote:

> > I got the same error as Habs on a stable install.
>
> I was convinced by Matteo and David that webkit2gtk build fine on stable
> and current for both arch, BUT it requires a LOT of resources, so i
> cancelled my revert and update README instead to make additional SWAP
> space if you have small amount of memory installed.
>
>
>
> --
> Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
>
>
> ___
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>
>
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Willy Sudiarto Raharjo]

> I got the same error as Habs on a stable install.

I was convinced by Matteo and David that webkit2gtk build fine on stable
and current for both arch, BUT it requires a LOT of resources, so i
cancelled my revert and update README instead to make additional SWAP
space if you have small amount of memory installed.



-- 
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Glenn Becker]

I got the same error as Habs on a stable install.

Glenn



On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Arnaud  wrote:

> Le 18 septembre 2017 12:19:26 GMT+02:00, Habs 
> a écrit :
>>
>> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:59:02 +0200
>> Ythogtha  wrote:
>>
>>
>>  Hi

  I think i made a mistake when testing this build. I *may have* ran
  it on a current VM rather than a stable VM, so i'm reverting it to
  2.16.0 in my branch for now while i'm investigating it further.


  --
  Willy Sudiarto Raharjo


>>>   I've just compiled it fine on a slackware64 14.2 fully
>>>  patched, but with a lot of other packages in it, so not a clean
>>>  install, but still not on a current branch. I didn't rebuild any
>>>  dependency since my last 2.16 build, compilation was already ongoing
>>>  when you sent your message, and I just let it go to see what would
>>>  happen.
>>>
>>>   Are you sure you didn't ran out of disk space ? It's taking a
>>>  lot of it during compilation
>>>
>>>
>> Hard disk space, no I dont think it is a partition space issue on the
>> machine how much would it require with this release compared to
>> previous ?
>>
>> The error message I attached, could that be caused by space issues?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Habs
>> --
>>
>> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
>> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>>
>>
> Well, it complains about a missing file, could be because it couldn't be
> created in the first place. Hence the disk space.
> Could also be for any number of other reasons...
> --
> Yth.
>
> ___
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>
>
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Arnaud]

Le 18 septembre 2017 12:19:26 GMT+02:00, Habs  a 
écrit :
>On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:59:02 +0200
>Ythogtha  wrote:
>
>
>> > Hi
>> > 
>> > I think i made a mistake when testing this build. I *may have* ran
>> > it on a current VM rather than a stable VM, so i'm reverting it to
>> > 2.16.0 in my branch for now while i'm investigating it further.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
>> >   
>> 
>>  I've just compiled it fine on a slackware64 14.2 fully
>> patched, but with a lot of other packages in it, so not a clean
>> install, but still not on a current branch. I didn't rebuild any
>> dependency since my last 2.16 build, compilation was already ongoing
>> when you sent your message, and I just let it go to see what would
>> happen.
>> 
>>  Are you sure you didn't ran out of disk space ? It's taking a
>> lot of it during compilation
>> 
>
>Hard disk space, no I dont think it is a partition space issue on the
>machine how much would it require with this release compared to
>previous ?
>
>The error message I attached, could that be caused by space issues?
>
>Thank you
>Habs
>___
>SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
>https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Well, it complains about a missing file, could be because it couldn't be 
created in the first place. Hence the disk space.
Could also be for any number of other reasons...
-- 
Yth.___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Christoph Willing]

On 18/09/17 18:51, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 01:59 AM, Habs wrote:
>> Hello All
>>
>> I'm afraid, I need some help please to sort out what's going on with
>> the build for webkit2gtk (2.18.0) downloaded via SBo today onto 
>> slackware 14.2 64bit full standard install.
>>
>> I have run the build on two different machines (AMD and Intel) and both
>> coming back with same error at same place. Previous version build fine.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Do I need to rebuild the listed dependencies (actually on the Intel all
>> were built), or is it something else that you can spot for me please ?
>>
>> Not sure, but I wonder if I've missed previous posts about
>> this..perhaps not ...  my mind is a sieve.
>>
>> (build error attached below).
>>
>> Thank you for any ideas/help etc.
>>
>> Habs
>>
>> [ 76%] Building CXX object
>> Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o
>> In file included
>> from 
>> /tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp:21:0:
>>  
>> /tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.h:23:40:
>> fatal error: WebCore/HysteresisActivity.h: No such file or directory
>> compilation terminated.
>> Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/build.make:51125: recipe for
>> target
>> 'Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o'
>> failed make[2]: ***
>> [Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o]
>> Error 1 CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1065: recipe for target
>> 'Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/all' failed make[1]: ***
>> [Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/all] Error 2 Makefile:149:
>> recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 r
> 
> Hi
> 
> I think i made a mistake when testing this build. I *may have* ran it on
> a current VM rather than a stable VM, so i'm reverting it to 2.16.0 in
> my branch for now while i'm investigating it further.
> 

2.18.0 builds fine here on stock 14.2.

An interesting aspect of the error above is the complaint about not
finding the file
/tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.h,
whereas it is actually located (and found during compilation) at
/tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.h
in my build log.

chris



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Habs]

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:59:02 +0200
Ythogtha  wrote:


> > Hi
> > 
> > I think i made a mistake when testing this build. I *may have* ran
> > it on a current VM rather than a stable VM, so i'm reverting it to
> > 2.16.0 in my branch for now while i'm investigating it further.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> >   
> 
>   I've just compiled it fine on a slackware64 14.2 fully
> patched, but with a lot of other packages in it, so not a clean
> install, but still not on a current branch. I didn't rebuild any
> dependency since my last 2.16 build, compilation was already ongoing
> when you sent your message, and I just let it go to see what would
> happen.
> 
>   Are you sure you didn't ran out of disk space ? It's taking a
> lot of it during compilation
> 

Hard disk space, no I dont think it is a partition space issue on the
machine how much would it require with this release compared to
previous ?

The error message I attached, could that be caused by space issues?

Thank you
Habs
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Ythogtha]

> On 09/18/2017 01:59 AM, Habs wrote:
> > Hello All
> > 
> > I'm afraid, I need some help please to sort out what's going on with
> > the build for webkit2gtk (2.18.0) downloaded via SBo today onto 
> > slackware 14.2 64bit full standard install.
> > 
> > I have run the build on two different machines (AMD and Intel) and both
> > coming back with same error at same place. Previous version build fine.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Do I need to rebuild the listed dependencies (actually on the Intel all
> > were built), or is it something else that you can spot for me please ?
> > 
> > Not sure, but I wonder if I've missed previous posts about
> > this..perhaps not ...  my mind is a sieve.
> > 
> > (build error attached below).
> > 
> > Thank you for any ideas/help etc.
> > 
> > Habs
> > 
> > [ 76%] Building CXX object
> > Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o
> > In file included
> > from 
> > /tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp:21:0:
> >  
> > /tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.h:23:40:
> > fatal error: WebCore/HysteresisActivity.h: No such file or directory
> > compilation terminated.
> > Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/build.make:51125: recipe for
> > target
> > 'Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o'
> > failed make[2]: ***
> > [Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o]
> > Error 1 CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1065: recipe for target
> > 'Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/all' failed make[1]: ***
> > [Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/all] Error 2 Makefile:149:
> > recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 r
> 
> Hi
> 
> I think i made a mistake when testing this build. I *may have* ran it on
> a current VM rather than a stable VM, so i'm reverting it to 2.16.0 in
> my branch for now while i'm investigating it further.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> 

I've just compiled it fine on a slackware64 14.2 fully patched, but with
a lot of other packages in it, so not a clean install, but still not on a 
current
branch. I didn't rebuild any dependency since my last 2.16 build, compilation 
was
already ongoing when you sent your message, and I just let it go to see what
would happen.

Are you sure you didn't ran out of disk space ? It's taking a lot of it
during compilation

-- 
Arnaud 
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] webkit2gtk build problems

[Willy Sudiarto Raharjo]

On 09/18/2017 01:59 AM, Habs wrote:
> Hello All
> 
> I'm afraid, I need some help please to sort out what's going on with
> the build for webkit2gtk (2.18.0) downloaded via SBo today onto 
> slackware 14.2 64bit full standard install.
> 
> I have run the build on two different machines (AMD and Intel) and both
> coming back with same error at same place. Previous version build fine.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Do I need to rebuild the listed dependencies (actually on the Intel all
> were built), or is it something else that you can spot for me please ?
> 
> Not sure, but I wonder if I've missed previous posts about
> this..perhaps not ...  my mind is a sieve.
> 
> (build error attached below).
> 
> Thank you for any ideas/help etc.
> 
> Habs
> 
> [ 76%] Building CXX object
> Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o
> In file included
> from 
> /tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp:21:0:
>  
> /tmp/SBo/webkitgtk-2.18.0/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.h:23:40:
> fatal error: WebCore/HysteresisActivity.h: No such file or directory
> compilation terminated.
> Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/build.make:51125: recipe for
> target
> 'Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o'
> failed make[2]: ***
> [Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/platform/graphics/cairo/BackingStoreBackendCairoImpl.cpp.o]
> Error 1 CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1065: recipe for target
> 'Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/all' failed make[1]: ***
> [Source/WebCore/CMakeFiles/WebCore.dir/all] Error 2 Makefile:149:
> recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 r

Hi

I think i made a mistake when testing this build. I *may have* ran it on
a current VM rather than a stable VM, so i'm reverting it to 2.16.0 in
my branch for now while i'm investigating it further.


-- 
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/