[SLUG] Red Hat Disks

2005-01-12 Thread Luke G. Evans
Hi.

I recently installed Red Hat 9 and am intending to burn my MS disks in
unholy ritual.

However the up2date feature of RHN requires me to download 434MB of source
code to be current - this is just absurd over 56k.

Do you know of a service where this disk can be purchased regularly in Aus?

Also - why don't they have a feature whereby the source can be parsed into
'code only' format - devoid of comments (assuming Linux software guys are
using comments) and long variable names (export/extern variables of course
would remain consistent) which would undoubtedly shrink these update
massively.

Thanks for your guidance.

Luke

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread Richard Neal




Im of the same opinion just throwing the towel in doesn't work. 

On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 16:39, Rod Butcher wrote:

I treat issues like this as "solution engineering" - they are problems 
that need to be fixed, not just put aside and another way found to do 
the job... otherwise you end up with a pile of things that still don't 
work and a load of halfbaked kludgy work practices. Or to be specific, I 
can't change banks every six months.
So, I'm still available to cooperate with any of you who want to get on 
StGeorge's case in an organized fashion.
cheers
Rod

Brought to you by a thunderbird, penguin, gnu and a camel








Kryten Cat: "Hey, I got it! We laser our way through!?"
Kryten: "Ah, an excellent suggestion, Sir, with just two minor drawbacks. One, we don't have a power source for the lasers, and two, we don't have any lasers."
   - Cat and Kryten, White Hole ( Red Dwarf )











signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread Rod Butcher
I treat issues like this as "solution engineering" - they are problems 
that need to be fixed, not just put aside and another way found to do 
the job... otherwise you end up with a pile of things that still don't 
work and a load of halfbaked kludgy work practices. Or to be specific, I 
can't change banks every six months.
So, I'm still available to cooperate with any of you who want to get on 
StGeorge's case in an organized fashion.
cheers
Rod

Brought to you by a thunderbird, penguin, gnu and a camel

Stuart Guthrie wrote:
 

I hope the "just switch banks then" suggestion
won't apepar in every thread though.

I think it is useful and important to let banks and providors know that 
if they are not up to scratch, they will lose business. 

As such, I think mentioning the 'switch' alternative is more relevant is
some of the posts. 

Also - certainly switching banks is, for many people 'really easy' and
in the case of St George much easier than getting their poxy interface
working.
Stu
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 15:35, Mary Gardiner wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
But of course, who wouldn't weigh up the financial implications?
I have no idea who wouldn't, but I wouldn't call such a decision "really
easy" as you did in your initial post.  Alas, these considerations mean
that the "latest way to use St George Internet banking with Linux" may
be with us for some time. I hope the "just switch banks then" suggestion
won't apepar in every thread though.
-Mary

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread Stuart Guthrie
 
> I hope the "just switch banks then" suggestion
> won't apepar in every thread though.

I think it is useful and important to let banks and providors know that 
if they are not up to scratch, they will lose business. 

As such, I think mentioning the 'switch' alternative is more relevant is
some of the posts. 

Also - certainly switching banks is, for many people 'really easy' and
in the case of St George much easier than getting their poxy interface
working.


Stu

On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 15:35, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
> > But of course, who wouldn't weigh up the financial implications?
> 
> I have no idea who wouldn't, but I wouldn't call such a decision "really
> easy" as you did in your initial post.  Alas, these considerations mean
> that the "latest way to use St George Internet banking with Linux" may
> be with us for some time. I hope the "just switch banks then" suggestion
> won't apepar in every thread though.
> 
> -Mary

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread Luke Yelavich
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:27:10PM EST, Mary Gardiner wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
> > IMHO. The solution to the whole St George banking debacle is really
> > easy. 
> > 
> > Move to another bank.  If they will not support modern operating
> > systems and basic HTTP compatible web browsers then they do not
> > deserve your business. 
> 
> The last discussion about this ended with someone pointing out that
> anyone with mortgages or term deposits among other things would suffer a
> *significant* financial penalty in switching banks: probably taking in
> the order of decades to recoup the time lost fiddling around with
> browsers (unless they value cross-browser compatibility very highly in
> dollar terms).

There is also the fact that not many banks offer particular cards. One 
of the reasons why I have an account with St George is due to wanting a 
Visa debit card.

Luke
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread Mary Gardiner
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
> But of course, who wouldn't weigh up the financial implications?

I have no idea who wouldn't, but I wouldn't call such a decision "really
easy" as you did in your initial post.  Alas, these considerations mean
that the "latest way to use St George Internet banking with Linux" may
be with us for some time. I hope the "just switch banks then" suggestion
won't apepar in every thread though.

-Mary
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread Stuart Guthrie
> It's probably more realistic to say that all other things (interest
> rates, exit fees, lending amounts) being equal, someone looking to do
> business with a bank should avoid St George.

But of course, who wouldn't weigh up the financial implications?

Stu


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] libgd dependencies prob

2005-01-12 Thread Voytek
I've tried to upgrade mrtg to a nwere built with an rpm, it wants libgd.so.2

# rpm -Uvh mrtg-2.10.5-1.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libgd.so.2   is needed by mrtg-2.10.5-1

I found an rpm for libgd.so.2, but, it complains as below:

# rpm -Uvh gd-2.0.21-5.20.1.i686.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
libpng12.so.0   is needed by gd-2.0.21-5.20.1
libgd.so.1.8   is needed by gnuplot-3.7.1-17
libgd.so.1.8   is needed by mrtg-2.9.17-3
libgd.so.1.8   is needed by webalizer-2.01_10-1
libgd.so.1.8   is needed by glibc-utils-2.2.5-44.legacy.3


where should I go from here ?

- leave the current mrtg ?
- force install ?
- go and have a cup of tea instead ?



-- 
Voytek
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread Mary Gardiner
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
> IMHO. The solution to the whole St George banking debacle is really
> easy. 
> 
> Move to another bank.  If they will not support modern operating
> systems and basic HTTP compatible web browsers then they do not
> deserve your business. 

The last discussion about this ended with someone pointing out that
anyone with mortgages or term deposits among other things would suffer a
*significant* financial penalty in switching banks: probably taking in
the order of decades to recoup the time lost fiddling around with
browsers (unless they value cross-browser compatibility very highly in
dollar terms).

It's probably more realistic to say that all other things (interest
rates, exit fees, lending amounts) being equal, someone looking to do
business with a bank should avoid St George.

-Mary
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread Stuart Guthrie
IMHO. The solution to the whole St George banking debacle is really
easy. 

Move to another bank.  If they will not support modern operating systems
and basic HTTP compatible web browsers then they do not deserve your
business. 

Today I was discussing setting up of a bank account and St George were
first on the hit list for rejects. The other party is an OSX user, I use
Linux. St George are useless. Vote with your feet.

Just MHO. Eventually they will get the message I'm sure. 


Stuart


On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 19:19, Linley Caetan wrote:
> Martin wrote:
> 
> > It works for me but very strangely. It is failing to consistently 
> > enable fields (like amount) and buttons (like 'pay now').
> >
> > FF1.0/RH9/J1.5
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin
> >
> > Mary Gardiner wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Jan 09, 2005, Ben Stanley wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
> >>>
> >>> (This is not the same string as I was using previously - but that one
> >>> didn?t work either.) Perhaps there is another user agent string that I
> >>> should be using?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> It varies for me. (Firefox 0.93 for Ubuntu Warty Warthog, Sun JDK 
> >> 1.4.2.)
> >>
> >>  - Default UA: Always get stuck at the redirect page
> >>  - Moz for Windows: Always get stuck at the redirect page
> >>  - IE6 for WinXP: Can get to the login screen, will sometimes crash the
> >>browser
> >>  - IE5 for Mac: Can get to the login screen, will sometimes crash the
> >>browser
> >>
> >>
> I  now do Firefox with Ie6 for the redirect page. Then you must switch 
> to real UA for the login.
> I use prefbar to make it easier.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] How do I cange permissions for a mounted drive?

2005-01-12 Thread Phil Scarratt
Steve Drinkald wrote:
Hello,
I am a newbie to Debian, so am very green.  I have a partition on my HDD
(FAT32) which I am sharing between Windows and Linux.  I have mounted it
in fstab with
/dev/hda6   /mnt/common vfatrw, user
The problem I have is that I cannot write to it.  I need to be /root to
write to this.  How do I cange it to allow all users to read and write
to it?  When I look at permissions, it tells me the file owner and group
are both "root" and only the owner can read/write/execute.  Group and
others can only read.
I've searched online for help, but haven't found anything that helps. 
If there is anyone that can help me it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Steve
You need to add the uid and gid options (eg uid=steve,gid=users) to the 
part of the fstab where it says rw, user.

See man mount for more info on what options are available for fat32
Fil
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] how to get shell script to supply password ?

2005-01-12 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Rod Butcher wrote:
>I need to get my shell script to login to something and then enter a 
>password at a prompt.. i.e. unattended operation. I can't get the script 
>to feed it the password, it always prompts me.. lets say userid=xx, 
>password=yy
>
>xyz login xx
>>password :
>
>at this point I  want the shell script to feed it the password yy
>
>I've tried | , < to no avail. Read the manpages. no dice.
>pointers greatfully received

The password is being read from a tty, not stdin, so you should use
somethign like expect (if you like to whip yourself) or perhaps the Expect
modules for perl or python may be more palatable.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Grub Configuration

2005-01-12 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 11 Jan, Lyle Chapman wrote:
>>  I have put in what I  
>>  think are the right params in grub, but I get a parsing error. 
>
>Personally, although grub is more powerful and flexible than lilo, I
>think it suffers from a major, major flaw: after changing the grub
>config file, there's no way to run grub to test whether that config
>will work.  You just have to cross your fingers and reboot and hope for
>the best.

Once the grub loader is installed you never have this problem, because grub
configs are separate from the loader.

If your config is hosed you can fix it at boot time by editing the kernel
boot arguments, changing the initrd path, etc, etc.

But sure, if you abort your installation before the boot loader has been
written to disk, you're in a tricky situation.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] How do I cange permissions for a mounted drive?

2005-01-12 Thread Steve Drinkald
Hello,
I am a newbie to Debian, so am very green.  I have a partition on my HDD
(FAT32) which I am sharing between Windows and Linux.  I have mounted it
in fstab with

/dev/hda6   /mnt/common vfatrw, user

The problem I have is that I cannot write to it.  I need to be /root to
write to this.  How do I cange it to allow all users to read and write
to it?  When I look at permissions, it tells me the file owner and group
are both "root" and only the owner can read/write/execute.  Group and
others can only read.

I've searched online for help, but haven't found anything that helps. 
If there is anyone that can help me it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Steve
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] how to get shell script to supply password ?

2005-01-12 Thread Angus Lees
At Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:41:21 +1100, Robert Thorsby wrote:
> On 2005.01.12 22:33 Rod Butcher wrote:
> > I need to get my shell script to login to something and then enter a
> > password at a prompt.. i.e. unattended operation. I can't get the
> > script to feed it the password, it always prompts me.. lets say
> > userid=xx, password=yy
> > xyz login xx
> > >password :
> > at this point I  want the shell script to feed it the password yy
> > I've tried | , < to no avail. Read the manpages. no dice.
> Try: http://expect.nist.gov/

To expand on Robert's answer a little:

Almost all "Password:" prompts are done by talking directly to the
programs "controlling tty".  The intention is precisely to bypass the
normal shell pipeline mechanism and prompt the user, even though the
input/output is doing something else.

Now some programs (like gnupg) will also read the password from some
arbitrary file descriptor when given a suitable command line option -
you can use this to pass in the password from another program.

In the general case, however, your program needs to setup a fake tty
and run the program in that, so that it can catch the password
prompt.  The classic program for doing that is "expect" at the URL
Robert gave you.  These days, most other languages (eg perl, python)
also have some sort of library for doing the same, usually called some
variation on "expect" - so if you are more familiar with a particular
language you might want to use its library.  If you don't feel up to
programming anything, the original expect has a "learning mode" where you
can just do what you want (as a human) and it will watch and generate
an expect script that will duplicate that - its pretty cool.

-- 
 - Gus

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] how to get shell script to supply password ?

2005-01-12 Thread Ben Stanley
If you can do the logging in part with ssh, then you can configure ssh
not to require passwords by copying a key to the target machine. After
doing that:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ben]$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ben]$

The details are in the documentation for ssh, but I think that you take
the stuff in ~/.ssh/id_dsa.pub from the machine you are logging in from
and add it into ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 in the machine you are logging
in to. There may be some option you have to turn on to enable it - I
can´t remember that much. You may also have to cause the keys to be
generated.

Ben.

On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 22:33, Rod Butcher wrote:
> I need to get my shell script to login to something and then enter a 
> password at a prompt.. i.e. unattended operation. I can't get the script 
> to feed it the password, it always prompts me.. lets say userid=xx, 
> password=yy
> 
> xyz login xx
>  >password :
> 
> at this point I  want the shell script to feed it the password yy
> 
> I've tried | , < to no avail. Read the manpages. no dice.
> pointers greatfully received
> thanks, Rod
> ---
> Brought to you by a thunderbird, penguin, gnu and a camel

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Grub Configuration

2005-01-12 Thread Ben Stanley
I keep a Knoppix CD around to aid in recovery from this kind of
disaster... It means you don´t have to use the inadequate tools in grub
to find the kernels.

Whats more, its got the man pages for grub on it (I don´t think its got
the info page though), so you can then just write the correct grub.conf
from within knoppix, save it and re-boot.

Your comment about it being nice having to test it still stands though.

Ben.

On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 22:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 11 Jan, Lyle Chapman wrote:
> >  I have put in what I  
> >  think are the right params in grub, but I get a parsing error. 
> 
> Personally, although grub is more powerful and flexible than lilo, I
> think it suffers from a major, major flaw: after changing the grub
> config file, there's no way to run grub to test whether that config
> will work.  You just have to cross your fingers and reboot and hope for
> the best.
> 
> At least running /sbin/lilo tells you instantly if you've got
> /etc/lilo.conf correct or not.
> 
> 
> And if you do happen to find yourself in the invidious position of
> having a hosed grub config (e.g. if you started installed SuSE 9.2 and
> then realised you'd forgotten to note down the pre-existing partition
> mount points, and abort the installation continuing with setting the
> partitions, only to discover that it hosed your existing grub boot
> config) -  then even knowing that you have workable Linux kernels on an
> un touched partition somewhere, if you could just remember where they
> were -  well, that's tough, since grub has insufficient built in
> commands to let you find them, since it has no equivalent of "ls" in
> its toolset.  The closest you can come is test for the existence of a
> named file ("find") or use tab completion 
> 
> Oh, wait, wait, that's how you do an ls: you remember the string
> "root (" and "kernel /" and you can work your way through the
> filesystems.  A little harder to remember than a command with a name
> (like "ls" or "find"), but what can you expect from people who prefer
> GNU "info" to Unix man pages?
> 
> 
> luke

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] GPG Keysigning

2005-01-12 Thread Craige McWhirter
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 10:02 +0100, Christoph Probst wrote:

> I'll be in Sydney on the 25th/26th this month and I'm looking
> for people who are interested in exchanging GPG keys.

It's a pity you won;t be here on the 28th, that's when this months
meeting is on.

-- 
Craige McWhirter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
McWhirter [consulting]
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] how to get shell script to supply password ?

2005-01-12 Thread Robert Thorsby
On 2005.01.12 22:33 Rod Butcher wrote:
I need to get my shell script to login to something and then enter a 
password at a prompt.. i.e. unattended operation. I can't get the 
script to feed it the password, it always prompts me.. lets say 
userid=xx, password=yy

xyz login xx
>password :
at this point I  want the shell script to feed it the password yy
I've tried | , < to no avail. Read the manpages. no dice.
Try:
http://expect.nist.gov/
Robert Thorsby
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] how to get shell script to supply password ?

2005-01-12 Thread Rod Butcher
I need to get my shell script to login to something and then enter a 
password at a prompt.. i.e. unattended operation. I can't get the script 
to feed it the password, it always prompts me.. lets say userid=xx, 
password=yy

xyz login xx
>password :
at this point I  want the shell script to feed it the password yy
I've tried | , < to no avail. Read the manpages. no dice.
pointers greatfully received
thanks, Rod
---
Brought to you by a thunderbird, penguin, gnu and a camel
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Grub Configuration

2005-01-12 Thread lukekendall
On 11 Jan, Lyle Chapman wrote:
>  I have put in what I  
>  think are the right params in grub, but I get a parsing error. 

Personally, although grub is more powerful and flexible than lilo, I
think it suffers from a major, major flaw: after changing the grub
config file, there's no way to run grub to test whether that config
will work.  You just have to cross your fingers and reboot and hope for
the best.

At least running /sbin/lilo tells you instantly if you've got
/etc/lilo.conf correct or not.


And if you do happen to find yourself in the invidious position of
having a hosed grub config (e.g. if you started installed SuSE 9.2 and
then realised you'd forgotten to note down the pre-existing partition
mount points, and abort the installation continuing with setting the
partitions, only to discover that it hosed your existing grub boot
config) -  then even knowing that you have workable Linux kernels on an
un touched partition somewhere, if you could just remember where they
were -  well, that's tough, since grub has insufficient built in
commands to let you find them, since it has no equivalent of "ls" in
its toolset.  The closest you can come is test for the existence of a
named file ("find") or use tab completion 

Oh, wait, wait, that's how you do an ls: you remember the string
"root (" and "kernel /" and you can work your way through the
filesystems.  A little harder to remember than a command with a name
(like "ls" or "find"), but what can you expect from people who prefer
GNU "info" to Unix man pages?


luke

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] An odd lpd printing problem solved

2005-01-12 Thread lukekendall
An odd problem with our printing started today - the printer wouldn't.
We were getting error messages like:

$ lpq
Get_local_host: hostname '-f' bad
$ lpr test
Get_local_host: hostname '-f' bad

It took me a while to realise that somehow the hostname had changed to
"-f", and this took out the whole printing system.

The hostname was correct after the system had been booting, according
to /var/log/messages, so I assume that at some stage I must have typed
"hostname -f" as root!  I have no recollection of doing so, though.

luke

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread linley
H. Loeung wrote:

Adding "?bhjs=0" to the redirect URL always works for me. E.g:
https://ibank.stgeorge.com.au/html/redirect.asp?bhjs=0
Haw.
 

Well done!
I've bookmarked it already.
How did you discover this neat work around?
It seems so simple. Why can't the people at St George get the thing 
going on their site?
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] BT: Mail Delivery (failure recruitment@office.casema.nl)

2005-01-12 Thread Recruitment



Geachte heer/mevrouw,
 
Hartelijk dank voor uw sollicitatie naar een functie 
binnen NV Casema.Wij hebben deze in goede orde 
ontvangen.
 
Vooralsnog kunnen wij u slechts berichten dat uw 
sollicitatie door ons in behandeling is genomen.Zodra er meer bekend is over 
de stand van zaken omtrent uw sollicitatie ontvangt u zo spoedig mogelijk nader 
bericht van ons.
 
Wij vertrouwen erop u hiermee voldoende te hebben 
geïnformeerd.
 
Met vriendelijke groet,
 
N.V. CASEMA
 
HR Administration
 
This e-mail message and its attachments are subject to the disclaimer published at the following website of Casema: 
http://www.casema.nl/disclaimer
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] exim4 deb pkg not creating conf dirs

2005-01-12 Thread Jocelyn Habib
Rocci wrote:
Hey sluggers,
Can someone please tell me how to fix up a stuffed up debian package 
situation ?

I'm trying to install exim4-daemon-heavy on a Sarge version of Debian 
but apt-get install exim4-daemon-heavy is not creating
all the directory paths. Eg. /etc/exim4...with related contents in it. 
The exim binary is installed etc..but much other important stuff seems 
to get sucked into some black hole on my drive.
I've removed previous version of exim using apt-get remove. Then tried 
repeatedly to install exim4 without complete success.
Tried dpkg-reconfigure after the install but this doesn't help either.

Any ideas clues would be appreciated.
- Rocci.
could you please use this apt-get remove --purge exim
and then install it again beware you have to install you remove with 
,you will se in front of you what pakg will it remove

Thanks


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

[SLUG] GPG Keysigning

2005-01-12 Thread Christoph Probst
Hi everyone,

I'll be in Sydney on the 25th/26th this month and I'm looking
for people who are interested in exchanging GPG keys.

My keys are 9978AF86 and 2A623F72.

If you are interested please text/call me on 0400946389 or
email me (I'm not on this list.)

Cheers,
Chris
-- 
Keks: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow. 
Kontakt-Details: http://www.christoph-probst.com/kontakt/
PGP-FP: B171 7EA4 988C DD90 1601  D21C 5279 2FAF 9978 AF86


pgpI9z2jqAST1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] St George Internet Banking

2005-01-12 Thread Linley Caetan
Martin wrote:
It works for me but very strangely. It is failing to consistently 
enable fields (like amount) and buttons (like 'pay now').

FF1.0/RH9/J1.5
Regards,
Martin
Mary Gardiner wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005, Ben Stanley wrote:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
(This is not the same string as I was using previously - but that one
didn?t work either.) Perhaps there is another user agent string that I
should be using?

It varies for me. (Firefox 0.93 for Ubuntu Warty Warthog, Sun JDK 
1.4.2.)

 - Default UA: Always get stuck at the redirect page
 - Moz for Windows: Always get stuck at the redirect page
 - IE6 for WinXP: Can get to the login screen, will sometimes crash the
   browser
 - IE5 for Mac: Can get to the login screen, will sometimes crash the
   browser

I  now do Firefox with Ie6 for the redirect page. Then you must switch 
to real UA for the login.
I use prefbar to make it easier.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html