[SLUG] The positively latest.
I'm using Hardy Heron on a laptop. apt-get install wine results in the installation of wine version 1.0 I have been told that the latest version, 1.1.2, is the one to have if I want to use a certain application. Is there a command like apt get go-to-wine-homepage, get version 1.1.2 and install it? Any help... William Bennett. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
Re: [SLUG] The positively latest.
*wget -q http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/apt/387EE263.gpg -O- | sudo apt-key add - **sudo wget http://wine.budgetdedicated.com/apt/sources.list.d/hardy.list -O /etc/apt/sources.list.d/winehq.list *Then just run *sudo aptitude update* and *sudo aptitude install wine* Masood On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 10:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Hardy Heron on a laptop. apt-get install wine results in the installation of wine version 1.0 I have been told that the latest version, 1.1.2, is the one to have if I want to use a certain application. Is there a command like apt get go-to-wine-homepage, get version 1.1.2 and install it? Any help... William Bennett. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
[SLUG] Re: Safe samba configuration
[global] domain master = no local master = no preferred master = no os level = 0 its also a good idea to set up a wins server, and send its details out using dhcp and set the client mode to wins only. Setting up a WINS server is easy; just set wins support = yes. That's it! Easy. Then tell your other devices to use the WINS server, this makes Windows naming much more stable. from man dhcp-options... Yep. Set - netbios-node-type 2 netbios-name-servers 192.168.1.9 - in your DHCP configuration (assuming you have an ISC DHCP server) and your clients will use WINS and WINS only for CIFS name- resolution. We have ~300 devices spread out via a WAN across 16 subnets and with WINS it all just works. Back when we used broadcasting it was awful. You can also set dns proxy = yes on your Samba server and if it doesn't find a name in WINS for a search request it will look into DNS on behalf of the client. This allows CIFS devices to see devices that don't support WINS. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
[SLUG] Re: Opinions pls on best/easiest setup Groupware suite.
In short, I guess what I'm really looking for is something to set up shared calendars, event/meeting invites and tasks for a single domain. Invite processing is really a feature of the client/UI. So maybe, I don't really needgroupware, but simply a shared calendar resource (accessible over the web). something that's not going to be _too heavy on resources. If you just want something pretty basic, very stable, and light I'd strongly recommend Horde. The UI is quite nice (especially the new DIMP interface) and actively maintained. It will sit nicely on just about any backend so can just start with a MySQL or PostgreSQL database. I know that GroupDAV and CalDAV capabilities are at least under development. http://www.horde.org/kronolith/roadmap/ -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
[SLUG] MythTV and Ubuntu Hardy
Has anyone got this up and going yet? David -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
[SLUG] SyPy Presentation: GAE demo with converting sql to datastore
Hi Python people, Next Thursday (31st July) is our monthly SyPy meetup (if we drink for long enough after the presentation it will be the first Thursday) There will be a presentation by Brett Morgan on a demonstration of building a basic google app engine application with a discussion of the differences translating from sql database to appengine's datastore Date Time: 6:30PM (for a 7pm start) - 8:30PM Thursday, 31 July 2008 Meeting Type: Presentation Venue: Google Australia, Level 18, Tower 1 Darling Park, 201 Sussex St, Sydney Notes: Congregate in the foyer downstairs near the security desk at or before 6:30 and the Google people will start taking people up in the elevators. After the meeting we will go to Hotel Sweeney's, 236 Clarence Street, Sydney, for some beer and thai food (if you are hungry). http://www.whereisthepub.org/content/view/88/51/ Dylan Jay Technical Solutions Manager, Pretaweb.com Skype:dylan_jay P:+61.2.99552830 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
[SLUG] Re: 31st July: SyPy Presentation: GAE demo with converting sql to datastore
Hi, Due to limited space please RSVP either via this facebook event http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=673532454k=Y5D52VUXSVXM51EGRC25WW or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your name. On Jul 25, 12:42 pm, Dylan Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Python People, Next Thursday (31st July) is our monthly SyPy meetup (if we drink for long enough after the presentation it will be the first Thursday) There will be a presentation by Brett Morgan on a demonstration of building a basic google app engine application with a discussion of the differences translating from sql database to appengine's datastore Date Time: 6:30PM (for a 7pm start) - 8:30PM Thursday, 31 July 2008 Meeting Type: Presentation Venue: Google Australia, Level 18, Tower 1 Darling Park, 201 Sussex St, Sydney Notes: Congregate in the foyer downstairs near the security desk at or before 6:30 and the Google people will start taking people up in the elevators. After the meeting we will go to Hotel Sweeney's, 236 Clarence Street, Sydney, for some beer and thai food (if you are hungry).http://www.whereisthepub.org/content/view/88/51/ -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
[SLUG] individual sender email verification on inbound
I have some web generated emails being sent as 'apache@' [as the default web user] (which perhaps I should change, but it never really caused problems in the past) now, an isp appears to be doing a user lookup as below and bounces emails, claiming my server is mis-configured: is there any req on me having an 'apache@' address if I'm sending emails as such ? (i.e., who misconfigured their server ?) Jul 28 20:40:47 bilby postfix/smtp[7850]: D4DFEB448D6: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], orig_to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], relay=neptune.acenet.com.au[203.189.80.75]:25, delay=23, delays=0.11/0.07/0.12/22, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host neptune.acenet.com.au[203.189.80.75] said: 550-Verification failed for [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550-Called: 116.197.145.51 550-Sent: RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550-Response: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table 550-Failed sender verify, if you believe this user is not a spammer and they 550-simply have a badly configured mailserver, contact ace to get an exeption 550 made (in reply to RCPT TO command)) -- Voytek -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
[SLUG] Non Acceptance
Would the Mediator of this group please explain why none of my requests are accepted. Am I doing something wrong? David -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
Re: [SLUG] Non Acceptance
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008, David Liell wrote: Would the Mediator of this group please explain why none of my requests are accepted. Am I doing something wrong? This mail came through with a bunch of others, which suggests that the list moderators were behind on approving mail. As for why they needed to be approved in the first place, best to contact the list moderators directly (I am not one of them, by the way) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which will get through even if you are moderated on the main list). -Mary -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
[SLUG] :o)
Hola, -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
Re: [SLUG] individual sender email verification on inbound
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29/07/2008 07:15:47 AM: I have some web generated emails being sent as 'apache@' [as the default web user] (which perhaps I should change, but it never really caused problems in the past) now, an isp appears to be doing a user lookup as below and bounces emails, claiming my server is mis-configured: is there any req on me having an 'apache@' address if I'm sending emails as such ? (i.e., who misconfigured their server ?) One could argue that either server is incorrectly configured. I suspect the receiving email server is checking if the sending email is valid in an attempt to stop spam. You could just alias apache@ to your (or another valid) email address, and that should stop the problem. Regards, Scott -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
Re: [SLUG] individual sender email verification on inbound
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 14:10 +1000, Mary Gardiner wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008, Voytek Eymont wrote: is there any req on me having an 'apache@' address if I'm sending emails as such ? (i.e., who misconfigured their server ?) Sender address verification is a fairly common anti-spam technique. RFC 2821 allows for mail to be rejected based on local policy, and the remote end has chosen to implement a policy whereby the return address must verifiably exist (in the sense of being able to receive the first part of an SMTP transaction) before accepting mail. So it's not a configuration that violates the protocol, that I can see. Whether it's a totally sensible configuration is another question: it tends to interact badly if the sender address in turn greylists incoming mail, for example. But it's unlikely to be accidental on their part. I for one think it's perfectly cromulent. If the sender MX utilises greylisting then it'll send back a transient failure message as distinct from a permanent 550 failure. At that point, the receiving MX can either assume a transient failure means it's normally a valid address and accept the mail, or give back its own transient failure - an eye for an eye if you like. If that's a problem, I'm more inclined to blame it on greylisting. Introducing needless artificial delays strikes me as an incredibly ugly solution for dealing with spam. -- Pete -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
