Re: [smartos-discuss] Dell R740s
I run SmartOS on R710 Check illumos hardware compatibility list: Illumos.org/hcl for your NICs Sent from my iPhone > On 9 May 2018, at 04:56, Ian Collinswrote: > > Hello, > > Does anyone here have any experience with SmartOS on a Dell R740 (with HBA330 > and Intel NICs) ? > > I'm about to order a couple and don't want to get burned - they are expensive > beasts... > > Cheers, > > -- > > Ian. > --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Re: [smartos-discuss] DHCP server in a zone?
Did you enable the service? Sent from my iPhone > On 19 Dec 2017, at 16:55, Matthias Teegewrote: > > Hello! > > I've installed SmartOS, created a zone and installed the isc-dhcpd > from the packages. I can see the DHCPDISCOVER and a DHCPOFFER in > the logs but dont see an answer packet on the network interfaces. > The client gets not address. I've also tried an lx branded zone > with the same result. > > Do I have "tune" the zone or the root zone to handle DHCP? > > Thanks! > Matthias > --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Re: Update SmartOS QEMU to a more recent version, e.g. to enable macOS support on Apple hardware / was: Re: [smartos-discuss] I run Joyent SmartOS on an Apple XServ( xserv 2,1 ) w/96 GB RAM
So you were at the same stage then that I am now Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Nov 2017, at 12:58, Peter Kelm <peter.k...@peterkelm.com> wrote: > > Gjermund, > > Sorry for the confusion - no, we did not make it work through option 1 due to > the lack of adequate patches. From what I recall we were able to boot the > Chameleon boot loader but that was it - and we only tried rather old OSX > versions (10.6 and 10.8). > > I pasted the JSON below mainly to illustrate that there’s an interface in > vmadm that can setup such options to a KVM zone description. > > To make this work one would probably need to back-port patches for CPU type > and Q35 platform support first. These could then also be tested with other > KVM VM’s apart from OSX/macOS. The second step would then be to resolve/fix > boot issues with OSX/macOS itself. > > BTW: We haven’t seen huge issues with Windows KVM performance at vcpus=1 > although it can be slow occasionally. We only use that OS in a few server > VMs, so bigger issues could go unnoticed... > > Hmm, I have quite some C/C++ programming expertise myself but haven’t spent > much time hacking QEMU. One’s ability to support such an effort would of > course be very limited without programming experience... > > Peter > >> Am 28.11.2017 um 11:33 schrieb Gjermund ॐ Gusland Thorsen >> <gjermundpri...@gmail.com>: >> >> My intial thought on your section 1 is did you make it work? I see there is >> vcpus = 1 in which at least for Windows is brutally slow; however with vcpus >> = 16 the running instance appears to be running at an enjoyable pace. >> >> I would be interested in helpings out on rejuvenating qemu in smartos, but >> not sure which part of me is needed. I have the "barebones" knowledge of >> scripting in several languages yet no experience in the field of KVM/qemu >> other than being a user of SmartOS. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 28 Nov 2017, at 11:21, Peter Kelm <peter.k...@peterkelm.com> wrote: >>> >>> Gjermund, >>> >>> We looked into the very same question ourselves a few months ago and came >>> up with the following approaches: >>> >>> 1) Fix KVM on SmartOS. >>> >>> This could be accomplished by either „upgrading“ the SmartOS supplied >>> version of QEMU or patching the existing version to make it boot macOS. >>> Each KVM zone on SmartOS has a „startvm" file in its root directory that >>> would need to be modified for a macOS VM. This could be accomplished by >>> passing the correct parameters to "vmadm create“, e.g. via >>> „qemu_extra_opts“, e.g.: >>> >>> { >>> "brand": "kvm", >>> "vcpus": 1, >>> "autoboot": false, >>> "alias": "OSX", >>> "ram": 2048, >>> "resolvers": ["192.168.17.1", "192.168.18.1"], >>> "disks": [ >>> { >>> "boot": true, >>> "model": "ide", >>> "size": 20480 >>> } >>> ], >>> "nics": [ >>> { >>> "nic_tag": "admin", >>> "model": "virtio", >>> "ip": "192.168.17.106", >>> "netmask": "255.255.255.0", >>> "gateway": "192.168.17.1" >>> } >>> ], >>> "qemu_extra_opts": "-kernel boot -device usb-kbd -device usb-mouse >>> -device isa-applesmc,osk=\“whatever\"“ >>> } >>> >>> Note that the patches published at >>> https://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/OSXKVM/ are for a much newer >>> version of QEMU (it was mentioned already on this thread that the version >>> ported to SmartOS is fairly ancient from today’s perspective)! >>> >>> Recent versions of OSX/macOS also require the Penryn CPU type and a Q35 >>> machine type. Such patches exist(ed) - at least in parts - for older QEMU >>> versions, but are completely in current QEMU. >>> >>> The SeaBIOS file referenced by Gabriel Somlo’s website should be fine as is >>> - but again: requires a newer version of QEMU. >>> >>> Helpful information - in
Re: Update SmartOS QEMU to a more recent version, e.g. to enable macOS support on Apple hardware / was: Re: [smartos-discuss] I run Joyent SmartOS on an Apple XServ( xserv 2,1 ) w/96 GB RAM
I can do stuff in c/cpp/objc/swift, but i never did any hardware emulation or KVM Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Nov 2017, at 12:58, Peter Kelm <peter.k...@peterkelm.com> wrote: > > Gjermund, > > Sorry for the confusion - no, we did not make it work through option 1 due to > the lack of adequate patches. From what I recall we were able to boot the > Chameleon boot loader but that was it - and we only tried rather old OSX > versions (10.6 and 10.8). > > I pasted the JSON below mainly to illustrate that there’s an interface in > vmadm that can setup such options to a KVM zone description. > > To make this work one would probably need to back-port patches for CPU type > and Q35 platform support first. These could then also be tested with other > KVM VM’s apart from OSX/macOS. The second step would then be to resolve/fix > boot issues with OSX/macOS itself. > > BTW: We haven’t seen huge issues with Windows KVM performance at vcpus=1 > although it can be slow occasionally. We only use that OS in a few server > VMs, so bigger issues could go unnoticed... > > Hmm, I have quite some C/C++ programming expertise myself but haven’t spent > much time hacking QEMU. One’s ability to support such an effort would of > course be very limited without programming experience... > > Peter > >> Am 28.11.2017 um 11:33 schrieb Gjermund ॐ Gusland Thorsen >> <gjermundpri...@gmail.com>: >> >> My intial thought on your section 1 is did you make it work? I see there is >> vcpus = 1 in which at least for Windows is brutally slow; however with vcpus >> = 16 the running instance appears to be running at an enjoyable pace. >> >> I would be interested in helpings out on rejuvenating qemu in smartos, but >> not sure which part of me is needed. I have the "barebones" knowledge of >> scripting in several languages yet no experience in the field of KVM/qemu >> other than being a user of SmartOS. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 28 Nov 2017, at 11:21, Peter Kelm <peter.k...@peterkelm.com> wrote: >>> >>> Gjermund, >>> >>> We looked into the very same question ourselves a few months ago and came >>> up with the following approaches: >>> >>> 1) Fix KVM on SmartOS. >>> >>> This could be accomplished by either „upgrading“ the SmartOS supplied >>> version of QEMU or patching the existing version to make it boot macOS. >>> Each KVM zone on SmartOS has a „startvm" file in its root directory that >>> would need to be modified for a macOS VM. This could be accomplished by >>> passing the correct parameters to "vmadm create“, e.g. via >>> „qemu_extra_opts“, e.g.: >>> >>> { >>> "brand": "kvm", >>> "vcpus": 1, >>> "autoboot": false, >>> "alias": "OSX", >>> "ram": 2048, >>> "resolvers": ["192.168.17.1", "192.168.18.1"], >>> "disks": [ >>> { >>> "boot": true, >>> "model": "ide", >>> "size": 20480 >>> } >>> ], >>> "nics": [ >>> { >>> "nic_tag": "admin", >>> "model": "virtio", >>> "ip": "192.168.17.106", >>> "netmask": "255.255.255.0", >>> "gateway": "192.168.17.1" >>> } >>> ], >>> "qemu_extra_opts": "-kernel boot -device usb-kbd -device usb-mouse >>> -device isa-applesmc,osk=\“whatever\"“ >>> } >>> >>> Note that the patches published at >>> https://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/OSXKVM/ are for a much newer >>> version of QEMU (it was mentioned already on this thread that the version >>> ported to SmartOS is fairly ancient from today’s perspective)! >>> >>> Recent versions of OSX/macOS also require the Penryn CPU type and a Q35 >>> machine type. Such patches exist(ed) - at least in parts - for older QEMU >>> versions, but are completely in current QEMU. >>> >>> The SeaBIOS file referenced by Gabriel Somlo’s website should be fine as is >>> - but again: requires a newer version of QEMU. >>
Re: [smartos-discuss] P410i failure or bug
Do you run smartos or sdc? Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Nov 2017, at 11:33, Nigel Magnaywrote: > > Yep, I'll progress trying to get another disk, (though god knows how long our > IT will take for that!) > > I belive I configured it up as JBOD - though my memory is hazy. It's > certainly possible it's in 'whatever the closest I could get' mode, which is > a good point and one I hadn't thought of. > > In any event, each of the drives appears to the O/S and Triton > auto-configured the zpool. > >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Paul Sture wrote: >> On 28 Nov 2017, at 11:09, Nigel Magnay wrote: >> >> > So I managed after much faff to find out which disk that was. After pulling >> > it out, the system no longer reboots every 15 mins or so (albeit I now have >> > a degraded pool). >> > >> > It feels therefore like there's a bug somewhere - is this just the P410i >> > being rubbish, drive firmware, something else? It's not a new machine, so >> > my guess is sooner or later anoter disk is going to start misbehaving. >> >> Putting another disk into that slot should enable you to see whether the >> original disk is the cause of the problem, or the problem lies elsewhere. >> >> Replacing that disk with a new one and bringing it into the existing pool >> will cause it to be silvered, which will give it plenty of exercise. >> > > smartos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Re: Update SmartOS QEMU to a more recent version, e.g. to enable macOS support on Apple hardware / was: Re: [smartos-discuss] I run Joyent SmartOS on an Apple XServ( xserv 2,1 ) w/96 GB RAM
My intial thought on your section 1 is did you make it work? I see there is vcpus = 1 in which at least for Windows is brutally slow; however with vcpus = 16 the running instance appears to be running at an enjoyable pace. I would be interested in helpings out on rejuvenating qemu in smartos, but not sure which part of me is needed. I have the "barebones" knowledge of scripting in several languages yet no experience in the field of KVM/qemu other than being a user of SmartOS. Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Nov 2017, at 11:21, Peter Kelmwrote: > > Gjermund, > > We looked into the very same question ourselves a few months ago and came up > with the following approaches: > > 1) Fix KVM on SmartOS. > > This could be accomplished by either „upgrading“ the SmartOS supplied version > of QEMU or patching the existing version to make it boot macOS. Each KVM zone > on SmartOS has a „startvm" file in its root directory that would need to be > modified for a macOS VM. This could be accomplished by passing the correct > parameters to "vmadm create“, e.g. via „qemu_extra_opts“, e.g.: > > { > "brand": "kvm", > "vcpus": 1, > "autoboot": false, > "alias": "OSX", > "ram": 2048, > "resolvers": ["192.168.17.1", "192.168.18.1"], > "disks": [ > { > "boot": true, > "model": "ide", > "size": 20480 > } > ], > "nics": [ > { > "nic_tag": "admin", > "model": "virtio", > "ip": "192.168.17.106", > "netmask": "255.255.255.0", > "gateway": "192.168.17.1" > } > ], > "qemu_extra_opts": "-kernel boot -device usb-kbd -device usb-mouse > -device isa-applesmc,osk=\“whatever\"“ > } > > Note that the patches published at > https://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/OSXKVM/ are for a much newer > version of QEMU (it was mentioned already on this thread that the version > ported to SmartOS is fairly ancient from today’s perspective)! > > Recent versions of OSX/macOS also require the Penryn CPU type and a Q35 > machine type. Such patches exist(ed) - at least in parts - for older QEMU > versions, but are completely in current QEMU. > > The SeaBIOS file referenced by Gabriel Somlo’s website should be fine as is - > but again: requires a newer version of QEMU. > > Helpful information - in addition to Gabriel’s website: > - https://github.com/kholia/OSX-KVM > - https://github.com/jibaron/q35-qemu (I believe these were the original > patches for a Q35 machine type in QEMU) > > 2) Use VirtualBox on SmartOS? > > The other possibility we came up with would be using macOS inside a > VirtualBox VM on SmartOS. macOS support in VirtualBox exists and there’s a > Solaris version that would need to be unpacked and integrated into the GZ > image (drivers!). From what I read it should run in a (non-global) zone but > information is scarce on that aspect. At the very least one would need to > integrate the VBox drivers into the SmartOS image and permit a zone to see > and access them. VBox itself can be controlled via the command line, so no > GUI would be needed. > > 3) There’s a newer QEMU version in pkgsrc > Jan Poctavek of Erigones (CC'd) mentioned this potential option to me some > weeks ago during a meeting. I haven’t looked into this at all and I am not > too sure whether it would help in the end (a second KVM version, similar > issues than VBox). But he might be able to give additional details. > > With all this said we would lean towards option 1) as it would have the best > long(er) term potential for the SmartOS platform. Additionally, other KVM’s > (incl. Windows) might also benefit from such a move by enabling additional > features and keeping closer track of QEMU’s development outside of SmartOS - > instead of rolling our own patchy version. > > Getting macOS KVM VM’s going would be very interesting for us. We lacked the > time to do it alone but with the coordinated effort of a (small) group of > people and it might be achievable… > > In this light it would also be interesting to hear from Joyent what their > take would be on „rejuvenating“ QEMU on SmartOS. > > Peter > >> Am 27.11.2017 um 19:17 schrieb Gjermund Gusland Thorsen >> : >> >> This should work for any intel Mac with the appropriate amount of CPU / RAM. >> I did not try on my MacPro yet. >> >> The challenge is in making the MacOS X boot inside the KVM zone as MacOS X >> boots using UEFI, and not legacy. In essence I have a preinstalled image >> made with CCC from the time when the xserve ran natively; yet I'm not able >> to make it boot inside the zone. Perhaps I'll just have to dd the image >> mounted CCC image to a file. I'm still not able to imagine how to tell the >> KVM zone how
Re: [smartos-discuss] Re: P410i failure or bug
How did you configure the P410i? Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Nov 2017, at 11:09, Nigel Magnaywrote: > > So I managed after much faff to find out which disk that was. After pulling > it out, the system no longer reboots every 15 mins or so (albeit I now have a > degraded pool). > > It feels therefore like there's a bug somewhere - is this just the P410i > being rubbish, drive firmware, something else? It's not a new machine, so my > guess is sooner or later anoter disk is going to start misbehaving. > > >> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Nigel Magnay wrote: >> HP DL380 with a P410i controller is failing. dmesg shows (Before reboot) : >> >> 2017-11-27T14:15:55.804472+00:00 headnode smrt: [ID 745811 kern.info] >> NOTICE: smrt0: controller event class/sub-class/detail 5, 1, 0: Fatal drive >> error, Port=1I Box=1 Bay=2; rescanning devices >> 2017-11-27T14:16:00.845994+00:00 headnode smrt: [ID 745811 kern.info] >> NOTICE: smrt0: controller event class/sub-class/detail 5, 1, 0: Fatal drive >> error, Port=1I Box=1 Bay=2; rescanning devices >> >> 2017-11-27T14:17:02.825141+00:00 headnode smrt: [ID 523928 kern.warning] >> WARNING: smrt0: controller ping timed out >> 2017-11-27T14:17:02.825171+00:00 headnode smrt: [ID 784599 kern.warning] >> WARNING: smrt0: controller ping failed; resetting controller >> 2017-11-27T14:17:02.825176+00:00 headnode smrt: [ID 370623 kern.warning] >> WARNING: smrt0: attempting controller soft reset >> 2017-11-27T14:17:08.925109+00:00 headnode smrt: [ID 795144 kern.notice] >> NOTICE: smrt0: soft reset: controller unready >> 2017-11-27T14:17:12.825173+00:00 headnode smrt: [ID 140962 kern.notice] >> NOTICE: smrt0: soft reset: controller ready >> 2017-11-27T14:17:51.256233+00:00 headnode smrt: [ID 148604 kern.info] >> NOTICE: smrt0: firmware rev 6.64 >> 2017-11-27T14:17:51.256260+00:00 headnode smrt: [ID 673390 kern.notice] >> NOTICE: smrt0: soft reset: controller configured >> (rebooted) >> >> Is this the controller simply failing, or an interaction of a disk failure? >> (All the lights are green on the front, so it's hard to identfy which 1I Box >> 1 Bay 2 refers to, otherwise I'd simply yank it to see if it helps.. >> > > smartos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
[smartos-discuss] Anyone able to compile swift4 yet? I would love to be able to run Kitura / Vapor
Sent from my iPhone --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Re: [smartos-discuss] Re: [smartos-discuss] AMD Ryzen 7 Support
Considered open indiana? Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Jul 2017, at 04:42, karthikwrote: > > Hello Ganapathy, > > Can SmartOS be used at all as a workstation for web app development,say for > java/php development with Eclipse? AFAIK we can use it as a live image booted > off CD/USB with everything in memory, except for /opt . This is akin to a > liveCD of linux like Knoppix. I do some of my personal web development on > illumos but I use XStreamOS which has a desktop version. So for XStreamOS, > apart from the native IPS package set, I have options of Joyent's > pkgsrc,OpenCSW or gentoo prefix as package sets. > > Thanks > Karthik > > From: "Heinz N. Gies" > Sent: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:12:21 > To: SmartOs Discuss > Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] AMD Ryzen 7 Support > > My test cluster runs 4 nodes with dual AMD Opteron 6127 which work fine with > SmartOS zones but of cause no KVM. They’ve been with me for over a year and > I’ve never had any SmartOs related problems. >> On 25. Jul 2017, at 06:15, Ganapathy S A wrote: >> >> Hello Roberto, >> >> I'm planning to buy a new PC for web app development in SmartOS platform >> (only OS zones). Were you able to run SmartOS without any issues? Or any >> other person? I still don't see AMD Ryzen (or any other AMD except one ☺️) >> here https://wiki.smartos.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=755673 >> >> Any advice would be helpful. >> >> Thanx, >> Ganapathy >> >>> On 24-Mar-2017 23:59, "Roberto Rivera" wrote: >>> Thanks for the video card insight Garrett. I swapped in an older Nvidia >>> Geforce GTX 745 card to see the impact. Regardless, the same errors show up >>> for both SmartOS and OmniOS. >>> >>> Would the bios setting have an impact? I have assumed that NX, SVM (virtual >>> machine), and IOMMU settings should be enabled and maybe that's incorrect. >>> Maybe other bios settings are impactful as well? >>> >>> Thanks again, >>> Rob >>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: The RX470 card probably won’t work except in basic VGA mode; this generation of AMD GPU requires a very new driver set from AMD (their amdgpu-pro drivers) which I don’t believe have been ported to illumos yet?) (For various reasons, I’m acutely aware of current AMD GPU stuff, owing to $dayjob.) - Garrett > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Dan McDonald wrote: > > > On Mar 23, 2017, at 11:55 PM, Roberto Rivera > > wrote: > > > > Tried OmniOS as suggested... after hitting the enter at the boot menu > > got the following: > > > > loading /platform/i86pc/amd64/boot_archive > > No rootfs module provided, aborting > > booting /platform/i86pc/kernel/amd64/unix > > No rootfs module provided, aborting > > > > Then was dropped to an "OK" prompt. > > Weird. That normally would indicate a malformed ISO or USB stick, but > I'm pretty sure these work on other HW and VMs. > > Thanks for the data. You can also try this one, just in case: > > http://kebe.com/~danmcd/webrevs/r151021-kayak.iso > > I spun it more recently than the 0314 ones. It'll likely fail the same > way for you, but it's worth a check. > > Thanks, > Dan > > > > > > > http://www.listbox.com > smartos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Re: [smartos-discuss] Asterisx on native zone?
Pls try to spin up a native zone, import your settings and tell us the results. Sent from my iPhone > On 5 May 2017, at 03:07, Rob Seastromwrote: > > Haven't seen anyone here ask about Asterisk in a couple of years. > > Our situation is that we're running a very long in the tooth release of > Astlinux on even more long in the tooth (PC Engines ALIX) hardware... oddly > enough that platform is still supported. > > Needs are modest. Only a handful of users. No DAHDI - it's VoIP in, VoIP > out. > > I see that the Asterisk release in pkgsrc for native zones is fairly modern > *and* is 1.8 branch, which would minimize my pain factor for the migration. > > Anyone running Asterisk in a native zone? An LX zone? Happy with it? I > want to get rid of the little ALIX boxes. Worst case I could spin up some > KVM zones and just put Astlinux in them, but I feel that's a step in the > wrong direction. Astlinix reputedly works just fine under Proxmox, which is > a fancy wrapper around KVM. > > Thanks, > > -r > --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Re: [smartos-discuss] Virtio driver versions for Windows
http://wethecomputerabusersamongst.blogspot.nl/2015/08/install-kvm-smartos-install-windows.html?m=1 Sent from my iPhone > On 18 Jan 2017, at 17:18, TRITONIA SOLUTIONS LIMITED> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to find the appropriate version of the Virtio drivers for use with > Windows 7, 8.1, 10, Server 2012R2 and Server 2016. It seems from my tests > that the latest Virtio-win-0.1.126 drivers from RHEL do not work with Windows > 7 or 8.1 (maybe just the NIC driver doesnt work). > > I'm interested to know which versions people use with each version of > Windows. > > Thanks in advance > > Sean Weatherall > smartos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Re: [smartos-discuss] 'Defrag' a KVM disk
Did you consider to make the file pool of the KVM a native ZFS file pool? CIFS or other Sent from my iPhone > On 18 Jan 2017, at 08:31, Matthias Goetzkewrote: > > We have a machine which temporarily got 98% full and the boot time of a KVM > windows server has gotten quite extreme (minutes on the black part of the > boot alone). > Apart from over-allocating, we guess it might have to do with fragmentation > of the underlying C drive (just a hunch due to the number of writes on C and > the fact that overall fragmentation was temporarily >78%) since another win > machine still booted up quite quickly. > > If a kvm disk were just a file then I could just make a copy of the C drive > (I have enough space now) into a new file which should (in theory) just > create new aligned blocks and once I delete the old file it should be > defragmented mostly. > > Is this correct ? And if so, kvm disks are mounted as raw devices, so I guess > my idea wont work anyway. Is there an alternative or is this a fools errant ? > > Cheers, > matthias > smartos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Re: [smartos-discuss] X11 over VNC
Are you using the internal VNC in the KVM? I believe certain VNC clients are incompatible. Sent from cyberspace > On 18 Sep 2016, at 16:20, G B via smartos-discuss >wrote: > > I'm running SmartOS 20160818T234814Z and using freebsd-10 20160415 in a KVM. > I've installed a number of window managers but the mouse never works. Has > anyone been able to use a window manager like WindowMaker, wmii, twm, etc., > over Xming? > > I tried generating an xorg.conf which typically isn't needed, but it doesn't > work. Here are the contents. > Section "ServerLayout" > Identifier "X.org Configured" > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > InputDevice"Mouse0" "CorePointer" > InputDevice"Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" > EndSection > > Section "Files" > ModulePath "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" > FontPath "/usr/local/share/fonts/misc/" > FontPath "/usr/local/share/fonts/TTF/" > FontPath "/usr/local/share/fonts/OTF/" > FontPath "/usr/local/share/fonts/Type1/" > FontPath "/usr/local/share/fonts/100dpi/" > FontPath "/usr/local/share/fonts/75dpi/" > EndSection > > Section "Module" > Load "glx" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Keyboard0" > Driver "kbd" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option"Protocol" "auto" > Option"Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option"ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" > EndSection > > Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > ModelName"Monitor Model" > EndSection > > Section "Device" > ### Available Driver options are:- > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz", > ### : "%" > ### [arg]: arg optional > #Option "ShadowFB" # [] > #Option "DefaultRefresh" # [] > #Option "ModeSetClearScreen" # [] > Identifier "Card0" > Driver "vesa" > BusID "PCI:0:2:0" > EndSection > > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device "Card0" > Monitor"Monitor0" > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 1 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 4 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 8 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 15 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 16 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 24 > EndSubSection > EndSection > > > > smartos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription --- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com