RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.
Hello _M _ Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog See a reduction of what in their backlog? Can you give an example of how to see this type of measurement? Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:44 AM To: Jorge Asch Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published. On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 12:19:12 PM, Jorge wrote: I am particularly interested to hear from MDaemon users who should realize a multi-fold improvement in processing speed by using this new version of persistent server. This is one of the critical goals of these modifications and preliminary responses support that we have achieved this goal. JA I run Mdaemon and I proces about 10K message a day. What things JA should I look for? How can I know the performance has actually improved? That's a good question. 10K/day is not very large so you may not see an improvement easily. What you are looking for is higher throughput, or more precisely, that your system is able to process more messages in a given period of time. Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog. Systems that have periods of heavy activity should see the these peaks handled more quickly. Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.
If I might butt in ... If you fire up Task Manager on a windows machine (or your favourite ps tool elsewhere), and set the View, Update Speed to High, then sort by the name in reverse, you will see multiple sniffer.exe and one with a PID that doesn't change. That's your persistent instance. What you should see is that all other instances of sniffer.exe wink in and out, with an ever-changing PID. So far, so good. Under a heavy load, your system is slow enough that you will see multiple sniffer.exe instances, and maybe they are using CPU and maybe not, depending on where the CPU load on your system is coming from. If those multiple instances are all using a small amount of RAM, and only the persistent instance uses 4,000 KB of memory, then the code is working well for you. The client instances are loading the rulebase. If some of those instances also have 4,000 KB of memory allocated, then they have gotten impatient and decided to load the rulebase and process the message for themselves. If you have a lot of impatient clients, they will exacerbate your memory and CPU stress, thus the new 2-3.0i8 code that lets them wait longer. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: Frank Osako [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published. Hello _M _ Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog See a reduction of what in their backlog? Can you give an example of how to see this type of measurement? Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:44 AM To: Jorge Asch Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published. On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 12:19:12 PM, Jorge wrote: I am particularly interested to hear from MDaemon users who should realize a multi-fold improvement in processing speed by using this new version of persistent server. This is one of the critical goals of these modifications and preliminary responses support that we have achieved this goal. JA I run Mdaemon and I proces about 10K message a day. What things JA should I look for? How can I know the performance has actually improved? That's a good question. 10K/day is not very large so you may not see an improvement easily. What you are looking for is higher throughput, or more precisely, that your system is able to process more messages in a given period of time. Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog. Systems that have periods of heavy activity should see the these peaks handled more quickly. Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.
Whups, I missed out an important NOT in the second-to-last paragraph. Corrected version is below: -Original Message- From: Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 10:29 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published. If I might butt in ... If you fire up Task Manager on a windows machine (or your favourite ps tool elsewhere), and set the View, Update Speed to High, then sort by the name in reverse, you will see multiple sniffer.exe and one with a PID that doesn't change. That's your persistent instance. What you should see is that all other instances of sniffer.exe wink in and out, with an ever-changing PID. So far, so good. Under a heavy load, your system is slow enough that you will see multiple sniffer.exe instances, and maybe they are using CPU and maybe not, depending on where the CPU load on your system is coming from. If those multiple instances are all using a small amount of RAM, and only the persistent instance uses 4,000 KB of memory, then the code is working well for you. The client instances are NOT loading the rulebase. If some of those instances also have 4,000 KB of memory allocated, then they have gotten impatient and decided to load the rulebase and process the message for themselves. If you have a lot of impatient clients, they will exacerbate your memory and CPU stress, thus the new 2-3.0i8 code that lets them wait longer. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: Frank Osako [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published. Hello _M _ Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog See a reduction of what in their backlog? Can you give an example of how to see this type of measurement? Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:44 AM To: Jorge Asch Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published. On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 12:19:12 PM, Jorge wrote: I am particularly interested to hear from MDaemon users who should realize a multi-fold improvement in processing speed by using this new version of persistent server. This is one of the critical goals of these modifications and preliminary responses support that we have achieved this goal. JA I run Mdaemon and I proces about 10K message a day. What things JA should I look for? How can I know the performance has actually JA improved? That's a good question. 10K/day is not very large so you may not see an improvement easily. What you are looking for is higher throughput, or more precisely, that your system is able to process more messages in a given period of time. Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog. Systems that have periods of heavy activity should see the these peaks handled more quickly. Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published.
Hello _M _ Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog See a reduction of what in their backlog? Can you give an example of how to see this type of measurement? a reduction of mail waiting for processing in your spool of course. for example, right now, my backlog is at around 800, if this new sniffer works the way they say, we should only have around 200-300 in our backlog, which is normal for emails waiting for resend because a host was unavailable, something like that, we have no installed the new updated as of yet, since our production server moves around 800,000 emails per day. we cannot take any chances. -Ken Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:44 AM To: Jorge Asch Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Version 2-3.0i8 published. On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 12:19:12 PM, Jorge wrote: I am particularly interested to hear from MDaemon users who should realize a multi-fold improvement in processing speed by using this new version of persistent server. This is one of the critical goals of these modifications and preliminary responses support that we have achieved this goal. JA I run Mdaemon and I proces about 10K message a day. What things JA should I look for? How can I know the performance has actually improved? That's a good question. 10K/day is not very large so you may not see an improvement easily. What you are looking for is higher throughput, or more precisely, that your system is able to process more messages in a given period of time. Systems with heavier loads _should_ see a reduction in their backlog. Systems that have periods of heavy activity should see the these peaks handled more quickly. Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
