Re: [Soekris] I see development of the net6801 has been dropped.
Howdy, I think this was a smart move. When I saw the original announcement for the 6801, I thought it was a bad idea. That kind of CPU with the support chips it needs is not cost effective. I hope they switch to a 64 bit arm design. Good day, Ralph ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] I see development of the net6801 has been dropped.
Howdy, On the low end, I would say a Banana Pi R1 router is comparable. I have one and it has problems, but is usable. I have only used it on slow networks(like 4 mbps down and 1 up. Cnewer chipsets with eight 64 bit cpus should be able to keep up with much faster traffic at low power. Ralph On 10/6/15, Christian Weisgerberwrote: > On 2015-10-06, Vadim Troshchinskiy wrote: > >> Besides, Lanner seems to have something out already. > > These Rangeley-based systems by ADI Engineering seem to be actually > available and in quantities down to 1: > > US: > http://store.netgate.com/Production-Systems-C209.aspx > > EU: > https://shop.voleatech.de/en/product-category/network-hardware/ > > -- > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de > ___ > Soekris-tech mailing list > Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com > http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech > ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] MS-DOS 6.22 on a net4801
Howdy, That was interesting about pxeboot and video cards. I don't think I ever tried a pxeboot install to a machine without video. I don't know if your real goal is to do the pxeboot install or to have DOS running. If it is to have DOS running, may I suggest a different route. I have setup DOS on several old machines, including some other embedded x86 boxes. I use another computer and a USB to CF adapter. I boot the computer with the dos diskette and write the CF card as if it were a hard drive. Then, I move it to the embedded device and boot it up. The biggest problem for me is getting the TCPIP stack installed and the ethernet drivers. You can edit the files on the other computer to do the configuration But finding DOS ethernet drivers for the built in NIC is the problem I did not solve for my boxes. It is pretty important for DOS on a 4801. You will need these driver, no matter how you install. Do you have them for the 4801? I have an unused 4801 I might try, if you have a pointer to them. And, I need to find the 4801 after my move. Good luck, Ralph ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] new to list
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 11:36 -0700, Carl E. Ma wrote: I am looking for device support followings: 1. ssh server 2. dns client 3. login 4. web server with java support The entry level - 4501 might be able to meet above requirement. My question is the size of storage. Is it possible to install regular OpenBSD or Ubuntu on it? May I install any size of compatible compact flash? Should I go with 5501 for bigger storage(USB2.0, ATA interface)? Howdy, I have run several 4521 soekris boxes until recently. I stopped using them for firewall boxes only because the amount of ram they had was too small for the newer versions of my firewall software. I am trying them out with openwrt and the results look good so far. All the features you ask for, except java, are there. The web browser is only used for configuration at the moment, but I don't see why you could not expand that. Used 4521 boards are available on ebay for $30. If you want to run Ubuntu, think about the version you want to run. Starting with Ubuntu 10.10, Ubuntu requires a CPU with CMOV support. They compile it for the 686 architecture, but the CMOV support is the only thing I have found that is needed that a 486 does not have. The geode on the Soekris 4500 series and 4801 boards is only capable of running an Ubuntu kernel up to version 10.04(supported with security updates for servers until 2015). I don't have any Geode LX boards(which the 5501 uses), so I can't say for sure, but I expect the 5501 would work with newer Ubuntu versions. The 4801 supports a standard laptop IDE drive. Any of these boards that have the 44 pin IDE connector or sata should be great for a Linux or BSD system. If you use Gentoo or one of the build it yourself distros, you can get about anything running. T2 works pretty well, and OpenEmbedded looks good, but I don't have it working yet. Good luck, Ralph ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] *BSD vs Linux
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 16:04 +0200, Marc Balmer wrote: So for a start, compare the GPL and the BSD/ISC/MIT licenses, and you will spot differences. Howdy, I have read these license and there are big differences. I do try BSD and usually have a BSD machine of some sort running. I have run FreeBSD, PC-BSD(really FreeBSD), OpenBSD and DragonFly. OK, DragonFly never fully ran, but I tried and will try it again. pf under FreeBSD is so much easier to understand than iptables and that is one appeal. I help run a Linux/Unix install project locally and I want to be able to answer questions about BSD and that is another reason. But, the GPL is such a strong incentive to stay primarily with Linux that I will probably move my main computers to BSD only if Microsoft finally finds some way to kill Linux. The GPL fosters an open ecosystem and the BSD licenses are better than nothing, but don't go far enough. I will avoid how I normally describe the BSD license because I don't want people to think I am flaming BSD people. Good day, Ralph ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Current best practice for OpenBSD installs?
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:47 +1000, Rod Whitworth wrote: It's a 4GB SanDisk Extreme III wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: SanDisk SDCFX-4096 wd0: 4-sector PIO, LBA, 3908MB, 8005536 sectors wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2 And here is an old one: wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: SanDisk SDCFB-512 wd0: 1-sector PIO, LBA, 488MB, 1000944 sectors Howdy, Your old one is SLC flash memory and should last a while. The newer one is MLC, which I would not trust. ... Please tell me how to kill it without unplugging it I killed 2 MLC sandisk 8GB cards by doing Ubuntu installs, then adding lots of packages and then using the machines heavily for about 3 weeks. I mounted /tmp and /var/tmp in ram and mounted /usr, where most of my files were as read only. The first time, I took the laptop to a conference to use it as my main machine. I was surprised it died so quickly. I wanted to find out if it was a fluke, so I used another card and tried it again when I got home. After a month, that card died, too. That was enough to convince me. If MLC works for you, that is great. I think I did a fair enough test that I won't trust it and advise against it. With that said, for a camera, I think MLC is generally fine. It is hard to take enough pictures for it to be a problem. In the right scenario, computers can be OK, but I would rather have the extra life of SLC. It is a full order of magnitude more durable. Good luck, Ralph ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Current best practice for OpenBSD installs?
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 21:30 +0200, Joakim Aronius wrote: * Johan Huldtgren (johan+soek...@huldtgren.com) wrote: With large flash cards being so easily affordable, what's the current best practice for OpenBSD installs? ... Agreed, from my point of view there is absolutely no need to do anything else than a standard install. Howdy, Large flash cards are not really so affordable. The junk ones you get in most stores are certainly large enough. But, these are almost always MLC(multi-level cell) memory and die way too quickly. Used SLC cards up to 512 meg seem pretty affordable, but I have not found them much larger at a price I can afford. Since the claim has been made here that these cards don't die anymore, I'll counter that. I have setup full featured systems with read only file systems and appropriate directories(/tmp, /var/tmp) mounted in ram and had MLC cards die after weeks of heavy use. There are things I could have done differently, but the point is that I have seen the cards fail on reasonably setup systems. This was in 2009, using new cards. Support is a valid issue, but then, the openbsd is the most hostile community to get support from of any OS I have tried. So, I don't know how much worse it would get. I try a lot of OSes, too. The Soekris community here is quite helpful and I regularly see what seems to be very responsive answers to people's problems. Have a good day, Ralph ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Bringing up net5501 in Openwrt, etc.
Howdy, I hope it is not improper, but I would like to broaden this request a bit. I would like to run OpenWRT on the Soekris 4521. I am looking for the same kind of information as Philip seeks about the 5501. The 4521 has lots more ram than the WRT%$G, so it seems like it should be possible. Good day, Ralph On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 14:52 -0600, Philip A. Prindeville wrote: Hi. I'm trying to bring up Openwrt, but running into a couple of problems. It's not immediately clear what chips--or chip libraries--are on the board, and hence what device drivers are required. ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Soekris 5501 with SSD disks
Howdy, If you are careful to not do more than one write to each sector per day, you should make it. An MLC cell should take 1 writes. 20 years is 7305 days, so there is no room for 2 writes per day. If you write to a normal filesystem, the directory sectors are not going to survive. Even with wear leveling, there will be too many writes. Good luck, Ralph On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 18:08 -0500, Bob Camp wrote: Hi If I can re-write the entire disk once a day for 20 years, that's good enough for what I'm doing. ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] pfSense on net5501
Howdy, I installed it to a CF card. I got it almost running on a Soekris 4521. It ran, but crashed because the 4521 does not have enough memory. I currently run pfSense from a CF card on a non-Soekris box with 124 meg of ram. It is a geode design that take 4 meg for video ram, even though there is no video. It works fine. I would have bought a Soekris, but I found someone tossing a bunch of these prior model Checkpoint routers and repurposed one. I downloaded the x86 image, did a dd to the CF card, and booted up. You have to be connected to the serial port of the computer you are booting pfSense on to do the initial configuration and then it is all by web. The charts in pfSense are great, but I am still deciding if I like it better overall than IPCop. My Soekris boxes will soon be fancy wireless access points, if I can get the software built. Good luck, Ralph On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 11:11 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: Hello, all. I've been trying to install pfSense on a net5501 for the last few days and I'm just about to give up in frustation. Before I do, I wanted to know if anybody had gotten pfSense installed on a CF card and booting on a net5501. Emmanuel ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
[Soekris] identifying 4521 memory
Howdy, I see used Soekris 4521 boards being offered reasonably often. Someone on this list even commented that they had a whole pile of them, although I never heard back when I asked for details. The specifications for the 4521 say it has 16-64 Mbyte SDRAM. I have 3 of these now and they do work well for me. I believe I will be in a position to use several more of these soon, but only want ones with 64 meg. I have never seen one of the ones with less memory in person. Is there some quick way I can identify how much memory the board has? I want to be able to ask the seller to check whatever characteristic. I think most of the sellers I have run across are not technical and are just handling used merchandise, so I need something simple, if possible. There is a new group starting in Dallas to experiment with and teach about embedded computers. I am looking for inexpensive hardware to teach with and that is where I thought the 4521 would work well. Good day, Ralph Green, Jr. ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
[Soekris] Help in identifying connector
Howdy, I have a 802.11a card I want to put into my Soekris 4521. It came out of a Proxim access point. My problem is that I don't know what kind of cable I need. The Proxim had two antennae and each had a cable that plugged into the cardbus nic. The cables are way to short to reach to the back of the Soekris case. The connectors look like the letter C when you look at them from the end that plugs into the card. I tried to get a picture, but they are just too small for my camera. I'd like to buy a cable to run from the card to the back of the case where I can use the Ant 1 on the case. Can anyone suggest what I should be looking for? Good day, Ralph ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Help in identifying connector
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 11:57 +0200, Aragon Gouveia wrote: Ralph Green wrote: Howdy, I have a 802.11a card I want to put into my Soekris 4521. It came out of a Proxim access point. My problem is that I don't know what kind of cable I need. The Proxim had two antennae and each had a cable that plugged into the cardbus nic. The cables are way to short to reach to the back of the Soekris case. The connectors look like the letter C when you look at them from the end that plugs into the card. I tried to get a picture, but they are just too small for my camera. I'd like to buy a cable to run from the card to the back of the case where I can use the Ant 1 on the case. Can anyone suggest what I should be looking for? Those tiny connectors are usually U.FL connectors: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hirose_U.FL In that article you see a U.FL to SMA pigtail - probably exactly what you need. Regards, Aragon Howdy, Nope, my 802.11g mini-pci card has that U.FL connector. Someone in this group helped me identify that several months back. The new 802.11a card connectors are very different. The cable connector looks like a letter C from the end and it slides into a connector on the edge of the 802.11a card. It is definitely not a U.FL connector. Thanks for trying, Ralph ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] building first image
Howdy, I am presently trying to build an image for a Soekris 4521 and this seems like an interesting approach you have here. I have the VirtualBox VM Manager in use and KVM installed on a test machine, but not tested yet. Has anyone used a similar approach with either of these hypervisors? If so, do you have any advice? The idea of being able to do test builds and run in a hypervisor seems like it would be a lot more productive than the way I test now. Good day, Ralph On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 09:19 -0700, Matthew Kaufman wrote: I've had great success with setting up a VMWare system with a virtual IDE drive the same size (or slightly smaller than) the CF cards I have in stock, configuring everything there, and then using 'dd' to copy the whole thing to a CF card via a USB-CF adapter. Just need to make sure the OS you set up will run on a 586, and you can make as many copies as you want. On Linux, there's a few things you need to do after it first boots on the new system, like remove the persistent ethernet mappings so they re-build, but otherwise it make for a very clean way to build up multiple similar/identical systems. Matthew ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech
Re: [Soekris] Soekris net4526 and miniPCI CF
Howdy, It looks like the answer is replacing it with another card. This card uses the Via VT6421A chip for IDE and Sata support. The CF card is just like parallel IDE. I just see complaints about how this chip is not well supported in Linux. I found an old reference to a patch file, but follow up statements saying it did not work on newer kernels. I had a Sata card that used this controller and never got that to work in Linux. If it helps any, the sata side is supposed to work ok, according to some. The ide side is the bad one, and that is what you seem to need. Good luck, Ralph On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 05:41 -0700, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi, we are trying to use a Soekris net4526 with a miniPCI to Compact Flash adapter [1] but we are having two problems. The first problem is that the card is not detected in comBIOS so i can not use boot 81 to boot from the Compact Flash card. To test the card really works we boot using PXE and it works (boots up). The second problem is that once we are booted up into the linux system the kernel complains about problems with IRQ [2] (not sure if that is fault of the motherboard or of the adapter or a combination of both) and when trying to copy things it ends up crashing the kernel. Yes, i've read the log and tried irqpoll, didn't work either. Any idea on if/how these things can be fixed? Thanks, Albert [1] http://www.globalamericaninc.com/Mini_PCI_Modules-Storage_Controller/c55_429/p1801120/1801120_-_Mini-PCI_Type_IIIB_124-pin_Storage_Interface_Module_Supports_1x_44-pin_EIDE,_2x_SATA-150,_1x_Compact_Flash/product_info.html [2] sata_via :00:11.0: version 2.4 sata_via :00:11.0: routed to hard irq line 11 scsi0 : sata_via scsi1 : sata_via scsi2 : sata_via ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 port i...@0xe000 bmdma 0xe040 irq 11 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 port i...@0xe010 bmdma 0xe048 irq 11 ata3: PATA max UDMA/133 port i...@0xe020 bmdma 0xe050 irq 11 ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310) ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310) irq 11: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option) Pid: 787, comm: scsi_eh_2 Not tainted 2.6.29.3 #1 Call Trace: [c0134c16] __report_bad_irq+0x2e/0x6f [c0134d44] note_interrupt+0xed/0x149 [c013537c] handle_level_irq+0x8d/0xcf [c01043d8] do_IRQ+0x50/0x68 [c0103227] common_interrupt+0x27/0x30 [c0119484] ? __do_softirq+0x31/0xbb [c0119533] do_softirq+0x25/0x2a [c011965e] irq_exit+0x28/0x5c [c01043dd] do_IRQ+0x55/0x68 [c0103227] common_interrupt+0x27/0x30 [c01f007b] ? cfq_insert_request+0x21b/0x383 [c025] ? sata_link_init_spd+0xc1/0x185 [c01f8cbc] ? iowrite8+0x20/0x30 [c025ba7c] ata_sff_dev_select+0x1c/0x26 [c025d7a1] ata_sff_softreset+0x53/0x106 [c0257447] ata_do_reset+0x49/0x4f [c025d74e] ? ata_sff_softreset+0x0/0x106 [c02587e1] ata_eh_reset+0x431/0xa10 [c025d854] ? ata_sff_prereset+0x0/0x98 [c025d74e] ? ata_sff_softreset+0x0/0x106 [c0259c9e] ata_eh_recover+0x270/0xa79 [c025d74e] ? ata_sff_softreset+0x0/0x106 [c025bc7c] ? ata_sff_postreset+0x0/0x5b [c025d74e] ? ata_sff_softreset+0x0/0x106 [c025d854] ? ata_sff_prereset+0x0/0x98 [c025d74e] ? ata_sff_softreset+0x0/0x106 [c025d854] ? ata_sff_prereset+0x0/0x98 [c025a62b] ata_do_eh+0x2b/0x6d [c025bc7c] ?
Re: [Soekris] One-LAN + PCI slot for compact PBX?
Howdy, I did not see the FXO hardware at astlinux.org. What kind of card are you looking at for 80 euros? That would not be a Digium brand card. I find a brand named OpenVOX for about that, but I don't know anyone who uses them and can tell me if they work OK. Good day, Ralph On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 17:53 +0200, Gilles wrote: http://soekris.eu/shop/net5501/net5501_60_board_and_1_slot_standard_case_en.html So the mobo + case + PSU costs about 230€, plus 20€ for the power supply, about 80€ for PCI card with an FXO module, and about 20€ for CF card, for a total of 350€. ___ Soekris-tech mailing list Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech