Re: EdgeNGramFilterFactory More specific ?
Thanks NGramFilter Work perfectly for my case ;) Guilleret Florian <http://www.girodmedical.com/> Tel : +33 6 21 28 43 06 2017-08-24 10:41 GMT+02:00 Markus Jelsma <markus.jel...@openindex.io>: > NGramFilter! > > > > -Original message- > > From:Guilleret Florian <guilleret.flor...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Thursday 24th August 2017 10:30 > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: EdgeNGramFilterFactory More specific ? > > > > I use a fieldtype who use EdgeNGramFilterFactory min 1 max 15. It work > > perfectly and i got this behavior : > > > > For string like : > > > > DU2083 > > > > I got : > > > > D > > DU > > DU2 > > DU20 > > DU208 > > DU2083 > > > > Its ok but i need do deeper. I want this behavior : > > > > DU2083 > > > > I need to split like : > > > > > > D > > DU > > DU2 > > DU20 > > DU208 > > DU2083 > > 3 > > 83 > > 083 > > 2083 > > U2083 > > DU2083 > > > > Like a reverse EdgeNGramFilterFactor. Do you know how to got this > behavior ? > > > > > > > > Guilleret Florian <http://www.girodmedical.com/> > > Tel : +33 6 21 28 43 06 > > >
EdgeNGramFilterFactory More specific ?
I use a fieldtype who use EdgeNGramFilterFactory min 1 max 15. It work perfectly and i got this behavior : For string like : DU2083 I got : D DU DU2 DU20 DU208 DU2083 Its ok but i need do deeper. I want this behavior : DU2083 I need to split like : D DU DU2 DU20 DU208 DU2083 3 83 083 2083 U2083 DU2083 Like a reverse EdgeNGramFilterFactor. Do you know how to got this behavior ? Guilleret Florian <http://www.girodmedical.com/> Tel : +33 6 21 28 43 06
Re: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work
Ok perfect I will do that then i have only 5-6 field so its ok.
Thank you for your help !
Guilleret Florian <http://www.girodmedical.com/>
Tel : +33 6 21 28 43 06
2017-08-21 13:32 GMT+02:00 Junte Zhang <junte.zh...@localsearch.ch>:
> Unfortunately not. I would recommend not to use a catch-all field (saves
> storage!), but list all the fields you consider "fulltext" in your
> application in a disjunction query. This should not come at the expensive
> of performance, unless you have a huge amount of fields. Then it should
> work.
>
> /JZ
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Guilleret Florian [mailto:guilleret.flor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 11:21 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work
>
> Yes i use the catch all field like :
>
>
>
> And you rights when I request solr like = this ?df=textNgramStr2 it works
> perfectly.
>
> But is there a way to still use the catch all field ? Because i have other
> file like name and description who are only in the _text_ and not in
> textNgramStr2
>
> Kind regards
>
> Guilleret Florian <http://www.girodmedical.com/> Tel : +33 6 21 28 43 06
>
> 2017-08-21 11:07 GMT+02:00 Junte Zhang <junte.zh...@localsearch.ch>:
>
> > You have to specify the field where you specified this field analyzer
> > in your request. If you use the catch all field by omitting the field,
> > it does not use your filter factory.
> >
> > /JZ
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Guilleret Florian [mailto:guilleret.flor...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:42 PM
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to got this use :
> >
> > My document got SKU. Like : 27VAN670
> >
> > When i query 27VAN670 solr return my document well.
> >
> > But when i query 27VAN solr return 0 document;
> >
> > So someone telle me to use EdgeNGramFilterFactory.
> >
> > With SOLR Api I add new Field Type :
> >
> > {
> > "add-field-type" : {
> > "name":"textNgram2",
> > "class":"solr.TextField",
> > "positionIncrementGap":"100",
> > "analyzer" : {
> > "tokenizer":{
> >"class":"solr.StandardTokenizerFactory" },
> > "filters":[{
> >"class":"solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory",
> >"minGramSize":"1",
> >"maxGramSize":"15"
> >}]}
> >}
> >
> > }
> >
> > And I also create a new Field :
> >
> > {
> > "add-field":{
> > "name":"textNgramStr2",
> > "type":"textNgram2",
> > "stored":true,
> > "indexed":true
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Now in SOLR admin I cans saw my new textNgramStr2. And when I update
> > my document in solr I put SKU of my product in textNgramStr2.
> >
> > But solr still found nothing when I request 27VAN
> >
> > Can someone help me on that ?
> >
>
Re: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work
Yes i use the catch all field like :
And you rights when I request solr like = this ?df=textNgramStr2 it works
perfectly.
But is there a way to still use the catch all field ? Because i have other
file like name and description who are only in the _text_ and not in
textNgramStr2
Kind regards
Guilleret Florian <http://www.girodmedical.com/>
Tel : +33 6 21 28 43 06
2017-08-21 11:07 GMT+02:00 Junte Zhang <junte.zh...@localsearch.ch>:
> You have to specify the field where you specified this field analyzer in
> your request. If you use the catch all field by omitting the field, it does
> not use your filter factory.
>
> /JZ
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Guilleret Florian [mailto:guilleret.flor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:42 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to got this use :
>
> My document got SKU. Like : 27VAN670
>
> When i query 27VAN670 solr return my document well.
>
> But when i query 27VAN solr return 0 document;
>
> So someone telle me to use EdgeNGramFilterFactory.
>
> With SOLR Api I add new Field Type :
>
> {
> "add-field-type" : {
> "name":"textNgram2",
> "class":"solr.TextField",
> "positionIncrementGap":"100",
> "analyzer" : {
> "tokenizer":{
>"class":"solr.StandardTokenizerFactory" },
> "filters":[{
>"class":"solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory",
>"minGramSize":"1",
>"maxGramSize":"15"
>}]}
>}
>
> }
>
> And I also create a new Field :
>
> {
> "add-field":{
> "name":"textNgramStr2",
> "type":"textNgram2",
> "stored":true,
> "indexed":true
> }
> }
>
> Now in SOLR admin I cans saw my new textNgramStr2. And when I update my
> document in solr I put SKU of my product in textNgramStr2.
>
> But solr still found nothing when I request 27VAN
>
> Can someone help me on that ?
>
EdgeNGramFilterFactory did not work
Hi,
I want to got this use :
My document got SKU. Like : 27VAN670
When i query 27VAN670 solr return my document well.
But when i query 27VAN solr return 0 document;
So someone telle me to use EdgeNGramFilterFactory.
With SOLR Api I add new Field Type :
{
"add-field-type" : {
"name":"textNgram2",
"class":"solr.TextField",
"positionIncrementGap":"100",
"analyzer" : {
"tokenizer":{
"class":"solr.StandardTokenizerFactory" },
"filters":[{
"class":"solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory",
"minGramSize":"1",
"maxGramSize":"15"
}]}
}
}
And I also create a new Field :
{
"add-field":{
"name":"textNgramStr2",
"type":"textNgram2",
"stored":true,
"indexed":true
}
}
Now in SOLR admin I cans saw my new textNgramStr2. And when I update
my document in solr I put SKU of my product in textNgramStr2.
But solr still found nothing when I request 27VAN
Can someone help me on that ?
Re: Query Partial Matching on auto schema
Thanks you for your answer. So i saw that in solrconfig.xml i got : true managed-schema And in file managed-schema i got all the schema : But solr tell to not edit the managed-schema. So where do i need to put this : ? Guilleret Florian <http://www.girodmedical.com/> Tel : +33 6 21 28 43 06 2017-06-23 16:48 GMT+02:00 Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>: > I simply do not recommend going to production with schemaless. That > mechanism must make certain assumptions about the data and simply > cannot anticipate all the types of searching you need to do. > > As Alessandro says, you can define whatever you want "by hand" and > still have schemaless add input. It becomes a matter of preference, > would you rather have documents with fields that haven't been seen > before fail immediately? Or would you rather have them get new fields > that you then have to discover? I prefer the former. > > Best, > Erick > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:41 AM, alessandro.benedetti > <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > > Quoting the official solr documentation : > > " You Can Still Be Explicit > > Even if you want to use schemaless mode for most fields, you can still > use > > the Schema API to pre-emptively create some fields, with explicit types, > > before you index documents that use them. > > > > Internally, the Schema API and the Schemaless Update Processors both use > the > > same Managed Schema functionality." > > > > Even using schemaless you can use the managed schema APi to define your > own > > field types and fields. > > > > For more info [1] > > > > [1] > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/schemaless- > mode.html#SchemalessMode-EnableManagedSchema > > > > > > > > - > > --- > > Alessandro Benedetti > > Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director > > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > > -- > > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/Query-Partial-Matching-on-auto-schema-tp4342502p4342509.html > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
Re: Query Partial Matching on auto schema
Yes I mean schemaless. Then with schemaless its impossible to have what I expect ? Guilleret Florian <http://www.girodmedical.com/> Tel : +33 6 21 28 43 06 2017-06-23 12:26 GMT+02:00 alessandro.benedetti <a.benede...@sease.io>: > With automatic schema do you mean schemaless ? > You will need to define a schema managed/old legacy style as you prefer. > > Then you define a field type that suites your needs ( for example with an > edge n-gram token filter[1] ). > And you assign that field type to a specific field. > > Than in your request handler/ when you build your query just use that field > to search. > > Regards > > [1] > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/filter-descriptions.html# > FilterDescriptions-EdgeN-GramFilter > > > > - > --- > Alessandro Benedetti > Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director > Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3. > nabble.com/Query-Partial-Matching-on-auto-schema-tp4342502p4342506.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
Query Partial Matching on auto schema
Hi, I use SOLR 5.2.1 with automatic schema. But when try a query with a partial word, Solr didn't found anything. Exemple : I request a query : NHLDO Solr return nothing but there is a document with name NHLDO457 If i request this query : NHLDO457 Solr return me the document. So how i can configure SOLR to retrieve document even with partial word in query with auto schema ? Kind Regards Guilleret Florian
