Re: Create incremental snapshot
Thanks for the reply Asif. We have already tried removing the optimization step. Unfortunately the commit command alone is also causing an identical behaviour . Is there any thing else that we are missing ? Asif Rahman wrote: Tushar: Is it necessary to do the optimize on each iteration? When you run an optimize, the entire index is rewritten. Thus each index file can have at most one hard link and each snapshot will consume the full amount of space on your disk. Asir On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:26 AM, tushar kapoor tushar_kapoor...@rediffmail.com wrote: What I gather from this discussion is - 1. Snapshots are always hard links and not actual files so they cannot possibly consume the same amountof space. 2. Snapshots contain hard links to existing docs + delta docs. We are facing a situation wherein the snapshot occupies the same space as the actual indexes thus violating the first point. We have a batch processing scheme for refreshing indexes. the steps we follow are - 1. Delete 200 documents in one go. 2. Do an optimize. 3. Create the 200 documents deleted earlier. 4. Do a commit. This process continues for around 160,000 documents i.e. 800 times and by the end of it we have 800 snapshots. The size of actual indexes is 200 Mb and remarkably all the 800 snapshots are of size around 200 Mb each. In effect this process consumes around 160 Gb space on our disks. This is causing a lot of pain right now. My concern are - Is our understanding of the snapshooter correct ? Should this massive space consumption be happening at all ? Are we missing something critical ? Regards, Tushar. Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Koushik Mitra koushik_mi...@infosys.comwrote: Ok If these are hard links, then where does the index data get stored? Those must be getting stored somewhere in the file system. Yes, of course they are stored on disk. The hard links are created from the actual files inside the index directory. When those older files are deleted by Solr, they are still left on the disk if at least one hard link to that file exists. If you are looking for how to clean old snapshots, you could use the snapcleaner script. Is that what you wanted to do? -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Create-incremental-snapshot-tp23109877p24405434.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Asif Rahman Lead Engineer - NewsCred a...@newscred.com http://platform.newscred.com :-(( -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Create-incremental-snapshot-tp23109877p24447593.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Create incremental snapshot
What I gather from this discussion is - 1. Snapshots are always hard links and not actual files so they cannot possibly consume the same amountof space. 2. Snapshots contain hard links to existing docs + delta docs. We are facing a situation wherein the snapshot occupies the same space as the actual indexes thus violating the first point. We have a batch processing scheme for refreshing indexes. the steps we follow are - 1. Delete 200 documents in one go. 2. Do an optimize. 3. Create the 200 documents deleted earlier. 4. Do a commit. This process continues for around 160,000 documents i.e. 800 times and by the end of it we have 800 snapshots. The size of actual indexes is 200 Mb and remarkably all the 800 snapshots are of size around 200 Mb each. In effect this process consumes around 160 Gb space on our disks. This is causing a lot of pain right now. My concern are - Is our understanding of the snapshooter correct ? Should this massive space consumption be happening at all ? Are we missing something critical ? Regards, Tushar. Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Koushik Mitra koushik_mi...@infosys.comwrote: Ok If these are hard links, then where does the index data get stored? Those must be getting stored somewhere in the file system. Yes, of course they are stored on disk. The hard links are created from the actual files inside the index directory. When those older files are deleted by Solr, they are still left on the disk if at least one hard link to that file exists. If you are looking for how to clean old snapshots, you could use the snapcleaner script. Is that what you wanted to do? -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Create-incremental-snapshot-tp23109877p24405434.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Master Slave data distribution | rsync fail issue
Hi,
I am facing an issue while performing snapshot pulling thru Snappuller
script from slave server :
We have the setup of multicores on Master Solr and Slave Solr servers.
Scenario , 2 cores are set :
i) CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM
ii) CORE_WWW.XYZ.COM
rsync-enable and rsync-start script run from CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM on master
server. Thus rsyncd.commf file got generated on CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM only ,
but not on CORE_WWW.XYZ.COM.
Rsyncd.conf of CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM :
rsyncd.conf file
uid = webuser
gid = webuser
use chroot = no
list = no
pid file =
/opt/apache-tomcat-6.0.18/apache-solr-1.3.0/example/solr/multicore/CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM/logs/rsyncd.pid
log file =
/opt/apache-tomcat-6.0.18/apache-solr-1.3.0/example/solr/multicore/CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM/logs/rsyncd.log
[solr]
path =
/opt/apache-tomcat-6.0.18/apache-solr-1.3.0/example/solr/multicore/CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM/data
comment = Solr
rsync error used to get generated while doing the pulling of master server
snapshot of a particular core CORE_WWW.XYZ.COM from slave end, for core
CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM snappuller occured without any error.
Also, this issue is coming only when snapshot are generated at master end
thru the way given below:
A) Snapshot are generated automatically by
editing “${SOLR_HOME}/solr/conf/solrconfig.xml” to let either commit index
or optimize index trigger the snapshooter (search “postCommit” and
“postOptimize” to find the configuration section).
Sample of solrconfig.xml entry on Master server End:
I)
listener event=postCommit class=solr.RunExecutableListener
str
name=exe/opt/apache-tomcat-6.0.18/apache-solr-1.3.0/example/solr/multicore/CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM/bin/snapshooter/str
str
name=dir/opt/apache-tomcat-6.0.18/apache-solr-1.3.0/example/solr/multicore/CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM/bin/str
bool name=waittrue/bool
arr name=args strarg1/str strarg2/str /arr
arr name=env strMYVAR=val1/str /arr
/listener
same way done for core CORE_WWW.XYZ.COM solrConfig.xml.
II) The dataDir tag remains commented on both the cores .XML on master
server.
Log sample for more clearity :
rsyncd.log of the core CORE_WWW.XYZ.COM:
2009/05/01 15:48:40 command: ./rsyncd-start
2009/05/01 15:48:40 [15064] rsyncd version 2.6.3 starting, listening on port
18983
2009/05/01 15:48:40 rsyncd started with
data_dir=/opt/apache-tomcat-6.0.18/apache-solr-1.3.0/example/solr/multicore/CORE_WWW.XYZ.COm/data
and accepting requests
2009/05/01 15:50:36 [15195] rsync on solr/snapshot.20090501153311/ from
deltrialmac.mac1.com (10.210.7.191)
2009/05/01 15:50:36 [15195] rsync: link_stat snapshot.20090501153311/. (in
solr) failed: No such file or directory (2)
2009/05/01 15:50:36 [15195] rsync error: some files could not be transferred
(code 23) at main.c(442)
2009/05/01 15:52:23 [15301] rsync on solr/snapshot.20090501155030/ from
delpearsondm.sapient.com (10.210.7.191)
2009/05/01 15:52:23 [15301] wrote 3438 bytes read 290 bytes total size
2779
2009/05/01 16:03:31 [15553] rsync on solr/snapshot.20090501160112/ from
deltrialmac.mac1.com (10.210.7.191)
2009/05/01 16:03:31 [15553] rsync: link_stat snapshot.20090501160112/. (in
solr) failed: No such file or directory (2)
2009/05/01 16:03:31 [15553] rsync error: some files could not be transferred
(code 23) at main.c(442)
2009/05/01 16:04:27 [15674] rsync on solr/snapshot.20090501160054/ from
deltrialmac.mac1.com (10.210.7.191)
2009/05/01 16:04:27 [15674] wrote 4173214 bytes read 290 bytes total size
4174633
I m unable to figure out that from where /. gets appeneded at the end
snapshot.20090501153311/.
Snappuller.log
2009/05/04 16:55:43 started by solrUser
2009/05/04 16:55:43 command:
/opt/apache-solr-1.3.0/example/solr/multicore/CORE_WWW.PUFFINBOOKS.CA/bin/snappuller
-u webuser
2009/05/04 16:55:52 pulling snapshot snapshot.20090504164935
2009/05/04 16:56:09 rsync failed
2009/05/04 16:56:24 failed (elapsed time: 41 sec)
Error shown on console :
rsync: link_stat snapshot.20090504164935/. (in solr) failed: No such file
or directory (2)
client: nothing to do: perhaps you need to specify some filenames or the
--recursive option?
rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(723)
B) The same issue is not coming while manually running the Snapshot script
after reguler interval of time at Master server and then running Snappuller
script at slave end for multiple cores. The postCommit/postOptimize part of
solrConfig.xml has been commented.
Here also rsync script run thru the core CORE_WWW.ABCD.COM. Snappuller and
snapinstaller occurred successfully.
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Master-Slave-data-distribution-%7C-rsync-fail-issue-tp23391580p23391580.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Unexpected sorting results when sorting with mutivalued filed
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:18 PM, tushar kapoor tushar_kapoor...@rediffmail.com wrote: I have indexes with a multivalued field authorLastName. I query them with sort=authorLastName asc and get the results as - Index# authorLastName 1 Antonakos 2 Keller 3 Antonakos Mansfield However Index#3 has a value starting with A (Antonakos ) .. Should'nt Index#3 preceed Index#2 in the results. The last value is used for sorting in multi-valued fields. What is the reason behind sorting on a multi-valued field? -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. Cant do much about it, that is the way our design is. Is there any way we can change this ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Unexpected-sorting-results-when-sorting-with-mutivalued-filed-tp22800877p22840705.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Unexpected sorting results when sorting with mutivalued filed
Hi, I have indexes with a multivalued field authorLastName. I query them with sort=authorLastName asc and get the results as - Index# authorLastName 1 Antonakos 2 Keller 3 Antonakos Mansfield However Index#3 has a value starting with A (Antonakos ) .. Should'nt Index#3 preceed Index#2 in the results. If this is not the default behaviour, what is the right work around for it. Regards, Tushar. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Unexpected-sorting-results-when-sorting-with-mutivalued-filed-tp22800877p22800877.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Dismax q.alt field for field level boosting
Hi, I am trying to test relevancy of results with the q.alt field on a Dismax Request Handler. Term level boosting based on bq information in solrconfig.xml works fine. However field level boosting based on the qf information in solrconfig.xml doesn't seem to work. Query q=q.alt=forrows=1000qt=dismaxrequest Results ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ? - response - lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime0/int - lst name=params str name=rows1000/str str name=q.altfor/str str name=q / str name=qtdismaxrequest/str /lst /lst - result name=response numFound=6 start=0 maxScore=5.244862E-8 - doc float name=score5.244862E-8/float str name=IndexId_sproduct_711069667/str str name=IndexId_str_sproduct_711069667/str str name=Index_Type_sproductIndex/str str name=Index_Type_str_sproductIndex/str str name=isbn10_product_s0425172651/str str name=isbn10_product_str_s0425172651/str str name=isbn13_product_s9780425172650/str str name=isbn13_product_str_s9780425172650/str str name=prdMainSubTitle_product_sThe Natural Solution for Pain/str str name=prdMainSubTitle_product_str_sThe Natural Solution for Pain/str str name=prdMainTitle_product_sMiracle of MSM/str str name=prdMainTitle_product_str_sMiracle of MSM/str str name=productId_product_s711069667/str str name=productId_product_str_s711069667/str str name=productPrice_product_s0/str str name=productPrice_product_str_s0/str str name=websiteId_product_s51728/str str name=websiteId_product_str_s51728/str /doc - doc float name=score4.495596E-8/float str name=IndexId_sproduct_711069593/str str name=IndexId_str_sproduct_711069593/str str name=Index_Type_sproductIndex/str str name=Index_Type_str_sproductIndex/str str name=isbn10_product_s0140265139/str str name=isbn10_product_str_s0140265139/str str name=isbn13_product_s9780140265132/str str name=isbn13_product_str_s9780140265132/str str name=prdMainSubTitle_product_sThe Search for the Great White Shark/str str name=prdMainSubTitle_product_str_sThe Search for the Great White Shark/str str name=prdMainTitle_product_sBlue Meridian/str str name=prdMainTitle_product_str_sBlue Meridian/str str name=productId_product_s711069593/str str name=productId_product_str_s711069593/str str name=productPrice_product_s0/str str name=productPrice_product_str_s0/str str name=websiteId_product_s51728/str str name=websiteId_product_str_s51728/str /doc - doc float name=score4.495596E-8/float str name=IndexId_sproduct_711069848/str str name=IndexId_str_sproduct_711069848/str str name=Index_Type_sproductIndex/str str name=Index_Type_str_sproductIndex/str str name=isbn10_product_s0721472869/str str name=isbn10_product_str_s0721472869/str str name=isbn13_product_s9780721472867/str str name=isbn13_product_str_s9780721472867/str str name=prdMainTitle_product_sDinosaur Stories for 5-year-olds/str str name=prdMainTitle_product_str_sDinosaur Stories for 5-year-olds/str str name=prdPubDate_product_s25-MAR-99/str str name=prdPubDate_product_str_s25-MAR-99/str str name=productId_product_s711069848/str str name=productId_product_str_s711069848/str str name=productPrice_product_s3.69/str str name=productPrice_product_str_s3.69/str str name=websiteId_product_s51728/str str name=websiteId_product_str_s51728/str /doc - doc float name=score4.495596E-8/float str name=IndexId_sproduct_711069902/str str name=IndexId_str_sproduct_711069902/str str name=Index_Type_sproductIndex/str str name=Index_Type_str_sproductIndex/str str name=isbn10_product_s0751362476/str str name=isbn10_product_str_s0751362476/str str name=isbn13_product_s9780751362473/str str name=isbn13_product_str_s9780751362473/str str name=prdMainTitle_product_sTouch Feel: ABC/str str name=prdMainTitle_product_str_sTouch Feel: ABC/str str name=prdPubDate_product_s03-FEB-00/str str name=prdPubDate_product_str_s03-FEB-00/str str name=productId_product_s711069902/str str name=productId_product_str_s711069902/str str name=productPrice_product_s4.99/str str name=productPrice_product_str_s4.99/str str name=strapline_product_sPhotographic tactile experience for young learners/str str name=strapline_product_str_sPhotographic tactile experience for young learners/str str name=websiteId_product_s51728/str str name=websiteId_product_str_s51728/str /doc - doc float name=score3.74633E-8/float str name=IndexId_sproduct_711069724/str str name=IndexId_str_sproduct_711069724/str str name=Index_Type_sproductIndex/str str name=Index_Type_str_sproductIndex/str str name=isbn10_product_s0135206510/str str name=isbn10_product_str_s0135206510/str str name=isbn13_product_s9780135206515/str str name=isbn13_product_str_s9780135206515/str str name=prdMainSubTitle_product_sHundreds of Sure-fire
FileBasedSpellChecker Multiple wordlist source files
I am using FileBasedSpellChecker and currently configuring it through one source file. Something like this - lst name=spellchecker str name=namedefault/str str name=classnamesolr.spelling.FileBasedSpellChecker/str str name=sourceLocation./files/spellings.txt/str str name=characterEncodingUTF-8/str str name=spellcheckIndexDir./spellcheckerindex/str /lst I have a whole bunch of other wordlist files which I want to use for spell-check. However I do not want to merge all these into one file. Is it possible to specify multiple wordlist sources in the same spell checker configuration ? I have tried using wildcards - *.txt but they dont seem to work. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FileBasedSpellChecker-Multiple-wordlist-source-files-tp21090710p21090710.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Russian stopwords
Hi Steve, You were right,it turned out to be a an encoding issue but a really weird one. I was using windows notepad to save the stopwords file in UTF-8 encoding. On the other hand I was using editplus to save synonyms file. That was the only difference. The moment I switched to editplus for saving stopwords file it started working for Russian, German and all type of languages. Anyways Thanks for the suggesting a valid direction. Regards, Tushar. Steven A Rowe wrote: Hi Tushar, On 12/05/2008 at 5:18 AM, tushar kapoor wrote: I am trying to filter russian stopwords but have not been successful with that. [...] filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=false/ [...] Intrestingly, Russian synonyms are working fine. English and russian synonyms get searched correctly. Also,If I add an English language word to stopwords.txt it gets filtered correctly. Its the russian words that are not getting filtered as stopwords. It might be an encoding issue - StopFilterFactory delegates stopword file reading to SolrResourceLoader.getLines(), which uses an InputStreamReader instantiated with the UTF-8 charset. Is your stopwords.txt encoded as UTF-8? It's strange that synonyms are working fine, though - SynonymFilterFactory reads in the synonyms file using the same mechanism as StopFilterFactory - is it possible that your synonyms file is encoded as UTF-8, but your stopwords file is encoded with a different encoding, perhaps KOI8-R? Like UTF-8, KOI8-R includes the entirety of 7-bit ASCII, so English words would be properly decoded under UTF-8. Steve -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Russian-stopwords-tp20851093p20868126.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Russian stopwords
I am trying to filter russian stopwords but have not been successful with that. I am using the following schema entry - . fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField analyzer tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory ignoreCase=true words=stopwords.txt/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory synonyms=synonyms.txt ignoreCase=true expand=false/ filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory generateWordParts=0 generateNumberParts=0 catenateWords=1 catenateNumbers=1 catenateAll=0/ filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory/ filter class=solr.RemoveDuplicatesTokenFilterFactory/ /analyzer /fieldType .. Intrestingly, Russian synonyms are working fine. English and russian synonyms get searched correctly. Also,If I add an English language word to stopwords.txt it gets filtered correctly. Its the russian words that are not getting filtered as stopwords. Can someone explain the behaviour. Thanks, Tushar. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Russian-stopwords-tp20851093p20851093.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Encoded search string qt=Dismax
Hoss, If the way I am doing it (Query 1) is a fluke, what is the correct way of doing it? Seems like there is something fundamental that I am missing. It would be great if you could list down the steps required to support multi language search. Please provide some context on how exactly Language analyzers are used. I am attaching - http://www.nabble.com/file/p20817191/schema.xml schema.xml http://www.nabble.com/file/p20817191/solrconfig.xml solrconfig.xml Also, I am using a multicore setup with support for only one language per core. The field type on which I have applied language analyzer(Russian) is text. Regards, Tushar. hossman wrote: First of all... standard request handler uses the default search field specified in your schema.xml -- dismax does not. dismax looks at the qf param to decide which fields to search for the q param. if you started with the example schema the dismax handler may have a default value for qf which is trying to query different fields then you actaully use in your documents. debugQuery=true will show you exactly what query structure (and on which fields) each request is using. Second... I don't know Russian, and character encoding issues tend to make my head spin, but the fact that the responseHeader is echoing back a q param containing java string literal sequences suggests that you are doing soemthing wrong. you should be sending the URL encoding of the actaul characters, not the URL encoding of the actual Russian word, not the URL encoding or the java string literal encoding of the Russian word. I suspect the fact that you are getting any results at all from your first query is a fluke. The str name=q in the responseHeader should show you the real word you want to search for -- once it does, then you'll know that you have the URL+UTF8 encoding issues straightened out. *THEN* i would worry about the dismax/standard behavior. : lst name=params : str : name=q\u041f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0435/str : /lst -Hoss -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Encoded--search-string---qt%3DDismax-tp20797703p20817191.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Multi Language Search
Hi, Before I start with Solr specific question, there is one thing I need to get information on. If I am a Russian user on a Russian Website I want to search for indexes having two Russian words how is the query term going to look like. 1. Russian Word 1 AND Russian Word 2 or rather, 2 . Russian Word 1 AND in Russian Russian Word 2 Now over to solr specific question. In case the answer to above is either 1. or 2. how does one do it using Solr. I tried using the Language anallyzers but I m not too sure how exactly it works. Regards, Tushar. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multi-Language-Search-tp20789025p20789025.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Encoded search string qt=Dismax
Hi, I am facing problems while searching for some encoded text as part of the search query string. The results don't come up when I use some url encoding with qt=dismaxrequest. I am searching a Russian word by posting a URL encoded UTF8 transformation of the word. The query works fine for normal request. However, no docs are fetched when qt=dismaxrequest is appended as part of the query string. The word being searched is - Russian Word - Предварительное UTF8 Java Encoding - \u041f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0435 Posted query string (URL Encoded) - %5Cu041f%5Cu0440%5Cu0435%5Cu0434%5Cu0432%5Cu0430%5Cu0440%5Cu0438%5Cu0442%5Cu0435%5Cu043b%5Cu044c%5Cu043d%5Cu043e%5Cu0435 Following are the two queries and the difference in results Query 1 - this one works fine ?q=%5Cu041f%5Cu0440%5Cu0435%5Cu0434%5Cu0432%5Cu0430%5Cu0440%5Cu0438%5Cu0442%5Cu0435%5Cu043b%5Cu044c%5Cu043d%5Cu043e%5Cu0435 Result - ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF8 ? response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime0/int lst name=params str name=q\u041f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0435/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=1 start=0 doc str name=Index_Type_sproductIndex/str str name=Index_Type_str_sproductIndex/str str name=URL_s4100018/str str name=URL_str_s4100018/str arr name=all strproductIndex/str strproduct/str strПредварительное K математики учебная книга/str str4100018/str str4100018/str str21125/str str91048/str str91047/str /arr str name=editionTypeId_s21125/str str name=editionTypeId_str_s21125/str arr name=listOf_taxonomyPath str91048/str str91047/str /arr str name=prdMainTitle_sПредварительное K математики учебная книга/str str name=prdMainTitle_str_sПредварительное K математики учебная книга/str str name=productType_sproduct/str str name=productType_str_sproduct/str arr name=strlistOf_taxonomyPath str91048/str str91047/str /arr date name=timestamp20081202T08:14:05.63Z/date /doc /result /response Query 2 - qt=dismaxrequest - This doesnt work ?q=%5Cu041f%5Cu0440%5Cu0435%5Cu0434%5Cu0432%5Cu0430%5Cu0440%5Cu0438%5Cu0442%5Cu0435%5Cu043b%5Cu044c%5Cu043d%5Cu043e%5Cu0435qt=dismaxrequest Result - ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF8 ? response lst name=responseHeader int name=status0/int int name=QTime109/int lst name=params str name=q\u041f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0432\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u044c\u043d\u043e\u0435/str str name=qtdismaxrequest/str /lst /lst result name=response numFound=0 start=0 maxScore=0.0 / /response Dont know why there is a difference on appending qt=dismaxrequest. Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Tushar. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Encoded--search-string---qt%3DDismax-tp20797703p20797703.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is it possible to specify a pattern of Ranking while querying the indexes?
In case I dont want to write a plugin code for that, what is the option that I am left with ? As I see it, one of the solution is to add a new a ranking field and query on the basis of ascending/descending values of the ranking filed. To change the sort order change the value of the ranking field by re-creating indexes. Is there any other way of doing it ? Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: Well that is not very well defined. I suppose if you can mathematically defined an ordering, you can implement it by writing some plugin code. On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:57 AM, tushar kapoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I need is a specific sorting order in which the documents are retrieved. The only way I know that this is possible is using something like this - widescreen AND HDTV^2; popular desc, score desc; as given on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyCookbook?highlight=%28ranking%29 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyCookbook?highlight=%28ranking%29 Can I specify an order other than ascending or descending. For instance, if I have a 'Product' field in indexes with values P1,P2,P3,P4 If I query like this - (queryString);Product desc; Result would be - ,P4,P3,P2,P1 Now I want the order to be ,P3,P2,P1,P4. Is this possible ? Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote: Can you give an example of what you mean? On Sep 26, 2008, at 11:28 AM, tushar kapoor wrote: I want to specify a particular pattern in which results are retrieved for a query. Can a pattern of ranks be specified in the query ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-specify-a-pattern-of-Ranking-while-querying-the-indexes--tp19690731p19690731.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com Lucene Helpful Hints: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-specify-a-pattern-of-Ranking-while-querying-the-indexes--tp19690731p19718201.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-specify-a-pattern-of-Ranking-while-querying-the-indexes--tp19690731p19719048.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Is it possible to specify a pattern of Ranking while querying the indexes?
What I need is a specific sorting order in which the documents are retrieved. The only way I know that this is possible is using something like this - widescreen AND HDTV^2; popular desc, score desc; as given on http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyCookbook?highlight=%28ranking%29 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyCookbook?highlight=%28ranking%29 Can I specify an order other than ascending or descending. For instance, if I have a 'Product' field in indexes with values P1,P2,P3,P4 If I query like this - (queryString);Product desc; Result would be - ,P4,P3,P2,P1 Now I want the order to be ,P3,P2,P1,P4. Is this possible ? Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote: Can you give an example of what you mean? On Sep 26, 2008, at 11:28 AM, tushar kapoor wrote: I want to specify a particular pattern in which results are retrieved for a query. Can a pattern of ranks be specified in the query ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-specify-a-pattern-of-Ranking-while-querying-the-indexes--tp19690731p19690731.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com Lucene Helpful Hints: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-specify-a-pattern-of-Ranking-while-querying-the-indexes--tp19690731p19718201.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is it possible to specify a pattern of Ranking while querying the indexes?
I want to specify a particular pattern in which results are retrieved for a query. Can a pattern of ranks be specified in the query ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-specify-a-pattern-of-Ranking-while-querying-the-indexes--tp19690731p19690731.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
