Re: Facet field query on subset of documents
Luis (or anyone else), Did you ever find a solution for this problem? If not, is querying twice the way to go? I'm looking to do the same with no luck yet. Thanks, Toby *** Toby Lazar Capital Technology Group Email: tla...@capitaltg.com Mobile: 646-469-5865 *** On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Luis Lebolo luis.leb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Erick, Thanks for the reply and sorry, my fault, wasn't clear enough. I was wondering if there was a way to remove terms that would always be zero (because the term came from a document that didn't match the filter query). Here's an example. I have a bunch of documents with fields 'manufacturer' and 'location'. If I set my filter query to manufacturer = Sony and all Sony documents had a value of 'Florida' for location, then I want 'Florida' NOT to show up in my facet field results. Instead, it shows up with a count of zero (and it'll always be zero because of my filter query). Using mincount = 1 doesn't solve my problem because I don't want it to hide zeroes that came from documents that actually pass my filter query. Does that make more sense? On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: That's what faceting does. The facets are only tabulated for documents that satisfy they query, including all of the filter queries and anh other criteria. Otherwise, facet counts would be the same no matter what the query was. Or I'm completely misunderstanding your question... Best, Erick On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Luis Lebolo luis.leb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Is it possible to perform a facet field query on a subset of documents (the subset being defined via a filter query for instance)? I understand that facet pivoting might work, but it would require that the subset be defined by some field hierarchy, e.g. manufacturer - price (then only look at the results for the manufacturer I'm interested in). What if I wanted to define a more complex subset (where the name starts with A but ends with Z and some other field is greater than 5 and yet another field is not 'x', etc.)? Ideally I would then define a facet field constraining query to include only terms from documents that pass this query. Thanks, Luis
Re: Facet field query on subset of documents
Hi Erick, Thanks for the reply and sorry, my fault, wasn't clear enough. I was wondering if there was a way to remove terms that would always be zero (because the term came from a document that didn't match the filter query). Here's an example. I have a bunch of documents with fields 'manufacturer' and 'location'. If I set my filter query to manufacturer = Sony and all Sony documents had a value of 'Florida' for location, then I want 'Florida' NOT to show up in my facet field results. Instead, it shows up with a count of zero (and it'll always be zero because of my filter query). Using mincount = 1 doesn't solve my problem because I don't want it to hide zeroes that came from documents that actually pass my filter query. Does that make more sense? On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote: That's what faceting does. The facets are only tabulated for documents that satisfy they query, including all of the filter queries and anh other criteria. Otherwise, facet counts would be the same no matter what the query was. Or I'm completely misunderstanding your question... Best, Erick On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Luis Lebolo luis.leb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Is it possible to perform a facet field query on a subset of documents (the subset being defined via a filter query for instance)? I understand that facet pivoting might work, but it would require that the subset be defined by some field hierarchy, e.g. manufacturer - price (then only look at the results for the manufacturer I'm interested in). What if I wanted to define a more complex subset (where the name starts with A but ends with Z and some other field is greater than 5 and yet another field is not 'x', etc.)? Ideally I would then define a facet field constraining query to include only terms from documents that pass this query. Thanks, Luis
Re: Facet field query on subset of documents
That's what faceting does. The facets are only tabulated for documents that satisfy they query, including all of the filter queries and anh other criteria. Otherwise, facet counts would be the same no matter what the query was. Or I'm completely misunderstanding your question... Best, Erick On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Luis Lebolo luis.leb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Is it possible to perform a facet field query on a subset of documents (the subset being defined via a filter query for instance)? I understand that facet pivoting might work, but it would require that the subset be defined by some field hierarchy, e.g. manufacturer - price (then only look at the results for the manufacturer I'm interested in). What if I wanted to define a more complex subset (where the name starts with A but ends with Z and some other field is greater than 5 and yet another field is not 'x', etc.)? Ideally I would then define a facet field constraining query to include only terms from documents that pass this query. Thanks, Luis
Facet field query on subset of documents
Hi All, Is it possible to perform a facet field query on a subset of documents (the subset being defined via a filter query for instance)? I understand that facet pivoting might work, but it would require that the subset be defined by some field hierarchy, e.g. manufacturer - price (then only look at the results for the manufacturer I'm interested in). What if I wanted to define a more complex subset (where the name starts with A but ends with Z and some other field is greater than 5 and yet another field is not 'x', etc.)? Ideally I would then define a facet field constraining query to include only terms from documents that pass this query. Thanks, Luis
