Re: Index download speed while replicating is fixed at 5.1 in replication.html

2020-06-16 Thread Florin Babes
Hello,
The patch is to fix the display. It doesn't configure or limit the speed :)


În mar., 16 iun. 2020 la 14:26, Shawn Heisey  a scris:

> On 6/14/2020 12:06 AM, Florin Babes wrote:
> > While checking ways to optimize the speed of replication I've noticed
> that
> > the index download speed is fixed at 5.1 in replication.html. There is a
> > reason for that? If not, I would like to submit a patch with the fix.
> > We are using solr 8.3.1.
>
> Looking at the replication.html file, the part that says "5.1 MB/s"
> appears to be purely display.  As far as I can tell, it's not
> configuring anything, and it's not gathering information from anywhere.
>
> So unless your solrconfig.xml is configuring a speed limit in the
> replication handler, I don't think there is one.
>
> I'm curious about exactly what you have in mind for a patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>


Re: Index download speed while replicating is fixed at 5.1 in replication.html

2020-06-16 Thread Shawn Heisey

On 6/14/2020 12:06 AM, Florin Babes wrote:

While checking ways to optimize the speed of replication I've noticed that
the index download speed is fixed at 5.1 in replication.html. There is a
reason for that? If not, I would like to submit a patch with the fix.
We are using solr 8.3.1.


Looking at the replication.html file, the part that says "5.1 MB/s" 
appears to be purely display.  As far as I can tell, it's not 
configuring anything, and it's not gathering information from anywhere.


So unless your solrconfig.xml is configuring a speed limit in the 
replication handler, I don't think there is one.


I'm curious about exactly what you have in mind for a patch.

Thanks,
Shawn


Index download speed while replicating is fixed at 5.1 in replication.html

2020-06-14 Thread Florin Babes
Hello,
While checking ways to optimize the speed of replication I've noticed that
the index download speed is fixed at 5.1 in replication.html. There is a
reason for that? If not, I would like to submit a patch with the fix.
We are using solr 8.3.1.
Thanks,
Florin Babes