RE: Facet Advice

2019-10-15 Thread Moyer, Brett
Hello Shawn, thanks for reply. The results that come back are correct, but are 
we implementing the query correctly to filter by a selected facet? When I say 
wrong, it's more about the design/use of Facets in the Query. Is it proper to 
do fq=Tags:Retirement? Is using a Multivalued field correct for Facets? Why do 
you say the above are not Facets?

Here is an excerpt from our JSON:

"facet_counts": {
"facet_queries": {},
"facet_fields": {
"Tags": [
"Retirement",
1260,
"Locations & People",
1149,
"Advice and Tools",
1015,
"Careers",
156,
"Annuities",
101,
"Performance",

Brett Moyer
Manager, Sr. Technical Lead | TFS Technology
  Public Production Support
  Digital Search & Discovery

8625 Andrew Carnegie Blvd | 4th floor
Charlotte, NC 28263
Tel: 704.988.4508
Fax: 704.988.4907
bmo...@tiaa.org

-Original Message-----
From: Shawn Heisey  
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 5:40 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Facet Advice

On 10/14/2019 3:25 PM, Moyer, Brett wrote:
> Hello, looking for some advice, I have the suspicion we are doing Facets all 
> wrong. We host financial information and recently "tagged" our pages with 
> appropriate Facets. We have built a Flat design. Are we going at it the wrong 
> way?
> 
> In Solr we have a "Tags" field, based on some magic we tagged each page on 
> the site with a number of the below example Facets. We have the UI team 
> sending queries in the form of 1) q=get a loan=Tags:Retirement, 2) q=get a 
> loan=Tags:Retirement AND Tags:Move Money. This restricts the resultset 
> hopefully guiding the user to their desired result. Something about it 
> doesn’t seem right. Is this right with a flat single level pattern like what 
> we have? Should each doc have multiple Fields to map to different values? Any 
> help is appreciated. Thanks!
> 
> Example Facets:
> Brokerage
> Retirement
> Open an Account
> Move Money
> Estate Planning

The queries you mentioned above do not have facets, only the q and fq 
parameters.  You also have not mentioned what in the results is wrong to you.

If you restrict the query to only a certain value in the tag field, then facets 
will only count documents that match the full query -- users will not be able 
to see the count of documents that do NOT match the query, unless you use 
tagging/excluding with your filters.  This is part of the functionality called 
multi-select faceting.

http://yonik.com/multi-select-faceting/

Because your message doesn't say what in the results is wrong, we can only 
guess about how to help you.  I do not know if the above information will be 
helpful or not.

Thanks,
Shawn
*
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and 
then delete it.

TIAA
*


Re: Facet Advice

2019-10-15 Thread Shawn Heisey

On 10/14/2019 3:25 PM, Moyer, Brett wrote:

Hello, looking for some advice, I have the suspicion we are doing Facets all wrong. We 
host financial information and recently "tagged" our pages with appropriate 
Facets. We have built a Flat design. Are we going at it the wrong way?

In Solr we have a "Tags" field, based on some magic we tagged each page on the site 
with a number of the below example Facets. We have the UI team sending queries in the form of 1) 
q=get a loan=Tags:Retirement, 2) q=get a loan=Tags:Retirement AND Tags:Move Money. 
This restricts the resultset hopefully guiding the user to their desired result. Something about 
it doesn’t seem right. Is this right with a flat single level pattern like what we have? Should 
each doc have multiple Fields to map to different values? Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

Example Facets:
Brokerage
Retirement
Open an Account
Move Money
Estate Planning


The queries you mentioned above do not have facets, only the q and fq 
parameters.  You also have not mentioned what in the results is wrong to 
you.


If you restrict the query to only a certain value in the tag field, then 
facets will only count documents that match the full query -- users will 
not be able to see the count of documents that do NOT match the query, 
unless you use tagging/excluding with your filters.  This is part of the 
functionality called multi-select faceting.


http://yonik.com/multi-select-faceting/

Because your message doesn't say what in the results is wrong, we can 
only guess about how to help you.  I do not know if the above 
information will be helpful or not.


Thanks,
Shawn