Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count
Hi Otis, Thanks for the info and help. I started reading up about it (on Markmail, nice site), and it looks like there is some activity to put it into 1.4. I will try and apply the patch, and see how that works. It seems like a couple of people are using it in a production environment already, with out grief. So that is a good thing. -John On Dec 11, 2008, at 1:24 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Hi John, It's not in the current release, but the chances are it will make it into 1.4. You can try one of the recent patches and apply it to your Solr 1.3 sources. Check list archives for more discussion, this field collapsing was just discussed again today/yesterday. markmail.org is a good one. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: John Martyniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:51:57 PM Subject: Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count Otis, Thanks for the information. It looks like the field collapsing is similar to what I am looking. But is that in the current release? Is it stable? Is there anyway to do it in Solr 1.3? -John On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:59 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Hi John, This sounds a lot like field collapsing functionality that a few people are working on in SOLR-236: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: John Martyniak To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:16:21 PM Subject: Sum of Fields and Record Count Hi, I am a new solr user. I have an application that I would like to show the results but one result may be the part of larger set of results. So for example result #1 might also have 10 other results that are part of the same data set. Hopefully this makes sense. What I would like to find out is if there is a way within Solr to show the result that matched with the query, and then to also show that this result is part of a collection of 10 items. I have thought about doing it using some sort of external process that runs, and with doing multiple queries, so get the list of items and then query against each item. But those don't seem elegant. So I would like to find out if there is a way to do it within Solr that is a little more elegant, and hopefully without having to write additional code. Thank you in advance for the help. -John
Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count
Hi John, What is your process for determining that #1 is part of the other result set? My gut says this is a faceting problem, i.e. #1 has a field contain its category that is also shared by the 10 other results, and that all you need to do is facet on the category field. The other thing that comes to mind is More Like This: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis -Grant On Dec 10, 2008, at 6:16 PM, John Martyniak wrote: Hi, I am a new solr user. I have an application that I would like to show the results but one result may be the part of larger set of results. So for example result #1 might also have 10 other results that are part of the same data set. Hopefully this makes sense. What I would like to find out is if there is a way within Solr to show the result that matched with the query, and then to also show that this result is part of a collection of 10 items. I have thought about doing it using some sort of external process that runs, and with doing multiple queries, so get the list of items and then query against each item. But those don't seem elegant. So I would like to find out if there is a way to do it within Solr that is a little more elegant, and hopefully without having to write additional code. Thank you in advance for the help. -John -- Grant Ingersoll Lucene Helpful Hints: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count
Grant, Basically I have created a text field that has the grouping value. All of the records would have the same value in this text field. This is accomplished with some pre-processing. When I capture the data, but before it is submitted into the index. -John On Dec 10, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John, What is your process for determining that #1 is part of the other result set? My gut says this is a faceting problem, i.e. #1 has a field contain its category that is also shared by the 10 other results, and that all you need to do is facet on the category field. The other thing that comes to mind is More Like This: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis -Grant On Dec 10, 2008, at 6:16 PM, John Martyniak wrote: Hi, I am a new solr user. I have an application that I would like to show the results but one result may be the part of larger set of results. So for example result #1 might also have 10 other results that are part of the same data set. Hopefully this makes sense. What I would like to find out is if there is a way within Solr to show the result that matched with the query, and then to also show that this result is part of a collection of 10 items. I have thought about doing it using some sort of external process that runs, and with doing multiple queries, so get the list of items and then query against each item. But those don't seem elegant. So I would like to find out if there is a way to do it within Solr that is a little more elegant, and hopefully without having to write additional code. Thank you in advance for the help. -John -- Grant Ingersoll Lucene Helpful Hints: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count
Grant, For the more like this that would show the grouped results, once you have clicked on the item, so basically making another query, would it show a count of the more like this results? Something like cxxc and a collection 10 other items. -John On Dec 10, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi John, What is your process for determining that #1 is part of the other result set? My gut says this is a faceting problem, i.e. #1 has a field contain its category that is also shared by the 10 other results, and that all you need to do is facet on the category field. The other thing that comes to mind is More Like This: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MoreLikeThis -Grant On Dec 10, 2008, at 6:16 PM, John Martyniak wrote: Hi, I am a new solr user. I have an application that I would like to show the results but one result may be the part of larger set of results. So for example result #1 might also have 10 other results that are part of the same data set. Hopefully this makes sense. What I would like to find out is if there is a way within Solr to show the result that matched with the query, and then to also show that this result is part of a collection of 10 items. I have thought about doing it using some sort of external process that runs, and with doing multiple queries, so get the list of items and then query against each item. But those don't seem elegant. So I would like to find out if there is a way to do it within Solr that is a little more elegant, and hopefully without having to write additional code. Thank you in advance for the help. -John -- Grant Ingersoll Lucene Helpful Hints: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count
Hi John, This sounds a lot like field collapsing functionality that a few people are working on in SOLR-236: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: John Martyniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:16:21 PM Subject: Sum of Fields and Record Count Hi, I am a new solr user. I have an application that I would like to show the results but one result may be the part of larger set of results. So for example result #1 might also have 10 other results that are part of the same data set. Hopefully this makes sense. What I would like to find out is if there is a way within Solr to show the result that matched with the query, and then to also show that this result is part of a collection of 10 items. I have thought about doing it using some sort of external process that runs, and with doing multiple queries, so get the list of items and then query against each item. But those don't seem elegant. So I would like to find out if there is a way to do it within Solr that is a little more elegant, and hopefully without having to write additional code. Thank you in advance for the help. -John
Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count
Otis, Thanks for the information. It looks like the field collapsing is similar to what I am looking. But is that in the current release? Is it stable? Is there anyway to do it in Solr 1.3? -John On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:59 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Hi John, This sounds a lot like field collapsing functionality that a few people are working on in SOLR-236: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: John Martyniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:16:21 PM Subject: Sum of Fields and Record Count Hi, I am a new solr user. I have an application that I would like to show the results but one result may be the part of larger set of results. So for example result #1 might also have 10 other results that are part of the same data set. Hopefully this makes sense. What I would like to find out is if there is a way within Solr to show the result that matched with the query, and then to also show that this result is part of a collection of 10 items. I have thought about doing it using some sort of external process that runs, and with doing multiple queries, so get the list of items and then query against each item. But those don't seem elegant. So I would like to find out if there is a way to do it within Solr that is a little more elegant, and hopefully without having to write additional code. Thank you in advance for the help. -John
Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count
Hi John, It's not in the current release, but the chances are it will make it into 1.4. You can try one of the recent patches and apply it to your Solr 1.3 sources. Check list archives for more discussion, this field collapsing was just discussed again today/yesterday. markmail.org is a good one. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: John Martyniak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:51:57 PM Subject: Re: Sum of Fields and Record Count Otis, Thanks for the information. It looks like the field collapsing is similar to what I am looking. But is that in the current release? Is it stable? Is there anyway to do it in Solr 1.3? -John On Dec 10, 2008, at 9:59 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Hi John, This sounds a lot like field collapsing functionality that a few people are working on in SOLR-236: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: John Martyniak To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:16:21 PM Subject: Sum of Fields and Record Count Hi, I am a new solr user. I have an application that I would like to show the results but one result may be the part of larger set of results. So for example result #1 might also have 10 other results that are part of the same data set. Hopefully this makes sense. What I would like to find out is if there is a way within Solr to show the result that matched with the query, and then to also show that this result is part of a collection of 10 items. I have thought about doing it using some sort of external process that runs, and with doing multiple queries, so get the list of items and then query against each item. But those don't seem elegant. So I would like to find out if there is a way to do it within Solr that is a little more elegant, and hopefully without having to write additional code. Thank you in advance for the help. -John
