Re: [spectre] How International is Media Art ? The Role of the Curatorial Practice

2006-03-09 Diskussionsfäden Annick Bureaud
I fully agree with Jose-Carlos. Last year was the Year of Brazil in 
France and the @rt Outsiders Festival was dedicated to Brazilian New 
media art. In the catalogue, that I guest edited, I included a strong 
focus on the Brazilian pionneers, such as Cordeiro, Palatnik, but also 
Oiticica, etc. We also included 2 texts specially about 2 organisations 
in Brazil that focus on exhibiting new media art. It is only 2, because 
... catalogs have limits in term of pages ;-)
The catalog, for those of you who might be interested, has been 
published by  Anomalie/Hyx  and the texts are both in French and 
English. Its title is ://Brasil. All the authors are brazilian. It 
includes texts by the artists in the exhibition and texts about the 
currents trends in Brazil and historical perspectives that I just 
mentionned.
The exhibition, curated by Jean-Luc Soret, included current Brazilian 
new media art and an historical piece by Esmeraldo (kinetic work, 
without motors but based on electro-static electricity). And it was 
important, as a curatorial statement, to show that new media art exist 
outside the usual paths with a high level of creativity, 
understanding, etc. In this case it was Brazil. But Riccardo dal Farra 
has done a whole research (with the Langlois Foundation) on 
computer-electronic-music in South America that encompasses many more 
countries.


Also, on the Leonardo/Olats web site, in the Pioneers  Pathbreakers 
(Pionniers et Précurseurs) project, we have information and 
documentation about Palatnik. I know that this site is mostly in French, 
but still, it does exist and shows that new media art is not only 
Western and that pionneers were also, in this case, in South America.


Annick


Jose-Carlos Mariategui wrote:

Dear Chris and friends:

I just came up with this interesting announcement of the International
Symposium on Curating New Media Art.  Yes, but it is Western-side
International Symposium, not a real International one.  It is a pity that
though there are so many projects going on at a wide (real) International
Scale, there is still the need to Westernize as much as possible the arts.
This is similar to the reasons why in the majority of books on the so-called
history of New Media there is not a single discussion on what happened
outside Europe, Japan or the USA.  This reflects a conformism and lack of a
real consideration of the ways in which new media art has been evolving,
quite successfully in many cases, through out the world, and I say the world
(including the so-called emergent 'others' that in economic terms
represented in 2005 more than half world's GDP).

So when you discuss of point out questions around 'learning from pioneers',
to what pioneers are you referring, to the semi-blind western sight?   Is
that what makes a good curator of media art?   I believe that one of the
most important points around the curatorial process is to understand a
context and the development of a history (in that sense perhaps the
work/efforts of Oliver Grau are worth mentioning) but lets be OPEN, not just
in OpenSource terms, lets admit that media art and therefore its curatorial
practice is a wide international activity and not just a bunch a friends
that talk about the same stuff over and over again.

I hope we try in the future to talk about the concept of International in a
much more real (or critical) sense, and not just by defining it from one
side of the world.

Jose-Carlos Mariategui


on 3/7/06 2:13 AM, Chris Byrne at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Art-Place-Technology
International Symposium on Curating New Media Art
Liverpool School of Art  Design and FACT Centre
30 March - 1 April 2006

Just ten days left to take advantage of our early bird registration
offer: ends on 17th March.
Register now and save 35% on the full registration fee.
Further programme details and online registration:
http://www.art-place-technology.org

New media art is a global phenomenon: a rapidly changing and dynamic
field of creative practice which crosses conventional categories and
disciplinary boundaries, challenging our assumptions about art.

- How do curators engage with new media art?
- What makes a good curator of new media art?
- What can we learn from the pioneers of this field?
- What does the future hold for curating new media art?
- What common ground exists with other disciplines?

These and other issues will be explored at Art-Place-Technology.
Speakers who are shaping the practice and theory of curating new media
art include:

Inke Arns, Hartware MedienKunstVerein, Dortmund.
Sarah Cook, CRUMB, University of Sunderland
Pierre-Yves Desaive, Fine Arts Museum of Belgium, Brussels
Paul Domela, Liverpool Biennial
Lina Dzuverovic, Electra, London
Charlie Gere, Lancaster University
Beryl Graham, CRUMB, University of Sunderland
Ceri Hand, FACT, Liverpool
Drew Hemment, Futuresonic, Manchester
Kathy Rae Huffman, Cornerhouse, Manchester
Stephen Kovats, V2, Rotterdam
Amanda McDonald Crowley, Eyebeam Art  

[spectre] final call: Computational Models of Creativity in the Arts

2006-03-09 Diskussionsfäden Paul Brown

Please circulate to colleagues  relevant lists - and apologies
for any duplication (the usual oxymoron)

DEADLINE APPROACHING 19 March 2006

Computational Models of Creativity in the Arts
a two-day workshop
Wednesday 16 to Thursday 17 May 2006

A partnership between Goldsmiths and Birkbeck Colleges and the
University of Sussex

Hosted by Goldsmiths Digital Studios, Ben Pimlott Building,
Goldsmiths College, University of London

Including a public evening performance/exhibition event on the 16
May curated by BLIP and the Computer Arts Society at the Science
Museum's Dana Centre in Knightsbridge

The proceedings will be a special issue of Digital Creativity
Journal (2007:1), Routledge

Call for Participation

This workshop will bring together practitioners and researchers
who are involved in the use of computational systems in the fine
and performing arts, literature, design and animation as well as
the associated fields of aesthetics, cognitive science, art
history and cultural theory.  It especially invites those
involved in the computational analysis and modelling of creative
behaviour to meet and share their experiences and explore the
potential of co-operative future ventures. It is intended that
this call should interest the widest possible constituency.
However a very broad list of (non-exclusive) descriptors might
include:
* the application of computational and generative methodologies
  in the arts and related creative disciplines
* computational approaches to creativity, cognition and
  aesthetics
* the application of artificial intelligence and artificial life
* the application of evolutionary and adaptive systems
* cultural applications of computing and digital electronics in
  general

Categories of Submission
* Position papers, posters, abstracts, etc...
  Places are limited!  Please send in a one-page (maximum) outline
  of why you (and your colleagues) would like to attend and what
  you could contribute and/or how you might benefit.  Include URLs
  to relevant projects/experience where possible
* Artworks, performances, etc...
  Please submit a one-page proposal including technical
  requirements.  Include URLs where possible

Deadline
The deadline for outlines and proposals is 19 March 2006.  They
should be sent to the conference chairs as PDF attachments to an
email with the subject CMCA Workshop Submission

Co-Chairs
* Paul Brown, University of Sussex - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Janis Jeffries, Goldsmiths - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Nick Lambert, Birkbeck - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Organising Committee
* Catherine Mason, Birkbeck
* Tim Blackwell, Goldsmiths
* Jon Bird, University of Sussex
* Miguel Andres-Clavera, Goldsmiths
* In-Yong Cho, Goldsmiths
* Maria x, Goldsmiths

Advisory Committee
* Margaret Boden, University of Sussex
* Phil Husbands, University of Sussex
* Ernest Edmonds, University of Technology, Sydney
* Charlie Gere, University of Lancaster
* Mitchell Whitelaw, University of Sussex
* Sue Gollifer, University of Brighton
* Tony Longson, California State University, Los Angeles
* Adrian David Cheok, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
* Dustin Stokes, University of Sussex

Funded by the London Centre for Arts and Cultural Enterprise -
LCACE - and the University of Sussex


__
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre



Re: [spectre] How International is Media Art ? The Role of the Curatorial Practice

2006-03-09 Diskussionsfäden Franck ANCEL
Annick, it's true.
We love Sao Paulo.

http://www.mobilefest.com.br/en/symposium.htm



 Message du 09/03/06 13:04
 De : Annick Bureaud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 A : Jose-Carlos Mariategui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Copie à : Spectre spectre@mikrolisten.de, iberoamerica ACT [EMAIL 
 PROTECTED]
 Objet : Re: [spectre] How International is Media Art ? The Role of the
 Curatorial Practice
 
 I fully agree with Jose-Carlos. Last year was the Year of Brazil in 
 France and the @rt Outsiders Festival was dedicated to Brazilian New 
 media art. In the catalogue, that I guest edited, I included a strong 
 focus on the Brazilian pionneers, such as Cordeiro, Palatnik, but also 
 Oiticica, etc. We also included 2 texts specially about 2 organisations 
 in Brazil that focus on exhibiting new media art. It is only 2, because 
 ... catalogs have limits in term of pages ;-)
 The catalog, for those of you who might be interested, has been 
 published by  Anomalie/Hyx  and the texts are both in French and 
 English. Its title is ://Brasil. All the authors are brazilian. It 
 includes texts by the artists in the exhibition and texts about the 
 currents trends in Brazil and historical perspectives that I just 
 mentionned.
 The exhibition, curated by Jean-Luc Soret, included current Brazilian 
 new media art and an historical piece by Esmeraldo (kinetic work, 
 without motors but based on electro-static electricity). And it was 
 important, as a curatorial statement, to show that new media art exist 
 outside the usual paths with a high level of creativity, 
 understanding, etc. In this case it was Brazil. But Riccardo dal Farra 
 has done a whole research (with the Langlois Foundation) on 
 computer-electronic-music in South America that encompasses many more 
 countries.
 
 Also, on the Leonardo/Olats web site, in the Pioneers  Pathbreakers 
 (Pionniers et Précurseurs) project, we have information and 
 documentation about Palatnik. I know that this site is mostly in French, 
 but still, it does exist and shows that new media art is not only 
 Western and that pionneers were also, in this case, in South America.
 
 Annick
 
 
 Jose-Carlos Mariategui wrote:
  Dear Chris and friends:
  
  I just came up with this interesting announcement of the International
  Symposium on Curating New Media Art.  Yes, but it is Western-side
  International Symposium, not a real International one.  It is a pity that
  though there are so many projects going on at a wide (real) International
  Scale, there is still the need to Westernize as much as possible the arts.
  This is similar to the reasons why in the majority of books on the so-called
  history of New Media there is not a single discussion on what happened
  outside Europe, Japan or the USA.  This reflects a conformism and lack of a
  real consideration of the ways in which new media art has been evolving,
  quite successfully in many cases, through out the world, and I say the world
  (including the so-called emergent 'others' that in economic terms
  represented in 2005 more than half world's GDP).
  
  So when you discuss of point out questions around 'learning from pioneers',
  to what pioneers are you referring, to the semi-blind western sight?   Is
  that what makes a good curator of media art?   I believe that one of the
  most important points around the curatorial process is to understand a
  context and the development of a history (in that sense perhaps the
  work/efforts of Oliver Grau are worth mentioning) but lets be OPEN, not just
  in OpenSource terms, lets admit that media art and therefore its curatorial
  practice is a wide international activity and not just a bunch a friends
  that talk about the same stuff over and over again.
  
  I hope we try in the future to talk about the concept of International in a
  much more real (or critical) sense, and not just by defining it from one
  side of the world.
  
  Jose-Carlos Mariategui
  
  
  on 3/7/06 2:13 AM, Chris Byrne at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
 Art-Place-Technology
 International Symposium on Curating New Media Art
 Liverpool School of Art  Design and FACT Centre
 30 March - 1 April 2006
 
 Just ten days left to take advantage of our early bird registration
 offer: ends on 17th March.
 Register now and save 35% on the full registration fee.
 Further programme details and online registration:
 http://www.art-place-technology.org
 
 New media art is a global phenomenon: a rapidly changing and dynamic
 field of creative practice which crosses conventional categories and
 disciplinary boundaries, challenging our assumptions about art.
 
 - How do curators engage with new media art?
 - What makes a good curator of new media art?
 - What can we learn from the pioneers of this field?
 - What does the future hold for curating new media art?
 - What common ground exists with other disciplines?
 
 These and other issues will be explored at Art-Place-Technology.
 Speakers who are shaping the practice and theory of 

[spectre] Re: new trans

2006-03-09 Diskussionsfäden Garrett Lynch


On 8 Mar 2006, at 08:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


what is the new in new media...what is the Trans in
transmedia.


definitions to contrast them from the existing, the established, rather 
than attempt to define them as they are still emerging


how do codifying phrases as linguistic constructs benefit and hinder 
work

that
appears online or on computers ?


usually they hinder more than benefit, think about the enormous 
problems the unwieldily term post-modern has created



it is 1 am and I am working on a
weather driven narrative...rambling.


rambling is good.

a+
gar
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.asquare.org/

__
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre



[spectre] plenum- 12 hour- 5 acts - expandable software

2006-03-09 Diskussionsfäden shu lea cheang

in the context of Node London media season,
in consideration of poly-media self-structuring,
the durational acts of totally expanded, expandable software.


PLENUM at NodeL
- A plenary meeting session in  12 hours, 5 acts , 2 interludes.
- Plus the optional epilogue.
- 7pm, March 25 to 7am, March 26, 2006 (door opens 6pm)
- Lime House Townhall, East London

- admission by a piece of raw (meat, fish, veggie +++)

PLENUM is a KOP + x collaboration
in association with Open Congress and Boxing Club

PLENUM  is a novel event format governed by a live-algorithm  that 
can variably be adapted to a number of issues affecting communities, 
groups and initiatives within the independent, self- organising 
framework of net culture today.


PLENUM refers to the space of open public meetings and public 
speeches/debates as a commons. The project relates to the current 
discourse on  open source software and open culture practice. It 
strives to probe consensual and participatory organisations, hold to 
account notions of transparency, shared commons and the underlying 
power structures.


PLENUM comes out of KOP's Kingdom of Piracy ongoing research 
project Commons/Tales and its RULE OUT: Autonomy takes on Openness 
workshop session at Open Congress, Tate Britain 2005. PLENUM at 
NodeL takes into account the media funding initiative and 
self-organizing efforts that produces this citywide London media 
season of March, 2006.  On a larger scheme,  PLENUM is concerned 
with the poly-independent system that we operate within.


In collaboration with KOP, X orchestrates five expanded software
acts with readily extendible Pd (pure data), SuperCollider patches or
any networked OSC-enabled code. The software is concerned with an
interface which operates in two directions - from the realm of
speculative or expanded software (aka. the social) to the reduced yet
equally effective realm of codified software and (as output, as
interference, as noise) the entry of executed results back. A
repetitive return trip. A two way street.

We invite media practitioners , cultural workers , Pders and all speculative
coders in any chosen language, who are part or not part of NodeL as 
speakers, moderators, performers, and participants for  PLENUM's 12 
hour tour de force.  With an aim at developing a working module for 
agenda setting  and self-organization, PLENUM further explores the 
tension between the individual and the group voice, the human 
material and machine factor,  the coming together and the falling 
apart, ultimately, the potential escalation of arguments leading to 
the (un)aviodable crash of self-made social units. Hopefully, a 
final walk out to River Thames at sunrise would revive the drained 
codes and souls.


*** Totally expanded software exercise bike supreme work out.***

http://kop.kein.org/plenum
http://x.1010.co.uk

Node London media season
http://www.nodel.org

PLENUM at NodeL
Call for remote and local participation of Pders and all speculative
coders no/any SC3, OSC (bitte RSVP) with five software patches or
modules being all extensible, expandable, open to any further
interpretation. All code strategies, such as the neural, audience
simulation, timeslicing, and rabbit holing welcome.

send e-mail to  m [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
SPECTRE list for media culture in Deep Europe
Info, archive and help:
http://coredump.buug.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/spectre