Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread Todd - FPDC
I  just coming from a church project where they added an 8 x 16 wooden canopy 
at the main entry. The project super (and also church member) has adamantly 
refused to install sprinklers even though they are required. I have told him 
that they are needed by Code, buy he remains defiant. I assume that the AHJ 
would pick up on it during final inspection, but can't count on it. 

My plan is to write a letter to the church (my client) stating that protection 
is required by Code and is my best advice, but if they choose not to, I am not 
responsible for the consequences. 

How have others handled similar situations? The inspection for CO is schedules 
for Friday. 

Sent from my iPhone
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread Eric Tysinger
A quick little heads up call to the AHJ/Inspector before the inspection does 
wonders for situations like that. 


Thanks,
Eric Tysinger CET
NICET III - 108988
Designer
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
4370 Motorsport Drive
Concord, NC 28027
p: (704)782-3032 x1751
f: (704)795-6838
C: (239)633-9703

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd - FPDC
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 10:01 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Owner refusal

I  just coming from a church project where they added an 8 x 16 wooden canopy 
at the main entry. The project super (and also church member) has adamantly 
refused to install sprinklers even though they are required. I have told him 
that they are needed by Code, buy he remains defiant. I assume that the AHJ 
would pick up on it during final inspection, but can't count on it. 

My plan is to write a letter to the church (my client) stating that protection 
is required by Code and is my best advice, but if they choose not to, I am not 
responsible for the consequences. 

How have others handled similar situations? The inspection for CO is schedules 
for Friday. 

Sent from my iPhone
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread Steve Leyton
Todd:

Have had to do this at least three or four times over the years.   A
disclaimer letter at least covers your butt, but a call to the AHJ gets
results - I recommend both.The reason we would normally NOT rat out
a client is the chance of losing future work; if said client is adamant
about putting you at risk of some future liability, they're not really
worth keeping in the long run.   But be absolutely sure that you're
correct before calling in the cavalry, as that can be REALLY
embarrassing if they don't back you up.   A discrete call and
run-through with the AHJ isn't a bad idea in that context ...

Steve L.
 


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd -
FPDC
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:01 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Owner refusal

I  just coming from a church project where they added an 8 x 16 wooden
canopy at the main entry. The project super (and also church member) has
adamantly refused to install sprinklers even though they are required. I
have told him that they are needed by Code, buy he remains defiant. I
assume that the AHJ would pick up on it during final inspection, but
can't count on it. 

My plan is to write a letter to the church (my client) stating that
protection is required by Code and is my best advice, but if they choose
not to, I am not responsible for the consequences. 

How have others handled similar situations? The inspection for CO is
schedules for Friday. 

Sent from my iPhone
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread Matthew J. Willis
I always let the heavyweights battle it out. Let the owner know that if they
cannot get, in writing, approval from the AHJ to deviate from 13, then you
cannot provide the paperwork stating the system is installed in compliance
with 13.

R/
Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 9:35 AM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Owner refusal
 
 Todd:
 
 Have had to do this at least three or four times over the years.   A
 disclaimer letter at least covers your butt, but a call to the AHJ gets
 results - I recommend both.The reason we would normally NOT rat out
 a client is the chance of losing future work; if said client is adamant
 about putting you at risk of some future liability, they're not really
 worth keeping in the long run.   But be absolutely sure that you're
 correct before calling in the cavalry, as that can be REALLY
 embarrassing if they don't back you up.   A discrete call and
 run-through with the AHJ isn't a bad idea in that context ...
 
 Steve L.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd -
 FPDC
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:01 AM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: Owner refusal
 
 I  just coming from a church project where they added an 8 x 16 wooden
 canopy at the main entry. The project super (and also church member) has
 adamantly refused to install sprinklers even though they are required. I
 have told him that they are needed by Code, buy he remains defiant. I
 assume that the AHJ would pick up on it during final inspection, but
 can't count on it.
 
 My plan is to write a letter to the church (my client) stating that
 protection is required by Code and is my best advice, but if they choose
 not to, I am not responsible for the consequences.
 
 How have others handled similar situations? The inspection for CO is
 schedules for Friday.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email
 to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3177 - Release Date: 10/05/10
 01:34:00

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread George Church
I'd say the letter is the first step- to the pastor or building committee
chair, someone OTHER THAN the supt refusing the work.
Note that they'll be ripping open the work to install sprinklers inside it
if relevant to the construction type and materials.
Note it is a code requirement and required for life safety as well as
property protection.
Prolly good to bring up the N word, N E G L I G E N C E if anyone is ever
hurt, since they've been advised they are ignoring the code. Possibly better
to add this verbally when telling them about the letter, either before you
send (possibly negating the reason for it if they cave) or as a follow up to
confirm it was received, understood, and then mention the downside- added
cost and/or Negligence. You'll prolly sound badge-heavy if you put
Negligence in the letter, although it depends on your perception of the
client. Noting that no A Certificate could be turned over would be
sufficient hammer- hopefully.

Your call to the AHJ- fine line to walk. If you know em, have a rapport with
em, make the call. If you don't know em from Adam, he may be best friends
with the supt and you've shot yourself in the foot. 
We got a call from a strip center owner who we've worked for off and on over
the years. Seems the pump and tank were abandoned 10 years ago just before
he bought the place, and a new waterline was run into the back of the
building. However, no BFPs were installed, WFS were built but not wired, and
the service was never switched over. Yes, 100,000 SF of dumpy strip center
was left unprotected for a decade. Yes, in the state that was first with the
IRC mandate, evidently no one in Harrisburg has seen NFPA 25. Anyway, it
came to light when a competitor went in to move heads for a new tenant, and
the system was off. In addition to calling the Owner, he called the BCO
(AHJ) who gave the Owner 48 hrs to cease operating the center. A little
tough with a dozen stores in operation! We were given the job, he certainly
wasn't going to call the guy that turned him in hoping since he was there
and the AHJ gave em a short time period to start repairs, he'd get the job.
Doesn't get that cold up here.

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Eric Tysinger
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 10:22 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Owner refusal

A quick little heads up call to the AHJ/Inspector before the inspection does
wonders for situations like that. 


Thanks,
Eric Tysinger CET
NICET III - 108988
Designer
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
4370 Motorsport Drive
Concord, NC 28027
p: (704)782-3032 x1751
f: (704)795-6838
C: (239)633-9703

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd - FPDC
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 10:01 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Owner refusal

I  just coming from a church project where they added an 8 x 16 wooden
canopy at the main entry. The project super (and also church member) has
adamantly refused to install sprinklers even though they are required. I
have told him that they are needed by Code, buy he remains defiant. I assume
that the AHJ would pick up on it during final inspection, but can't count on
it. 

My plan is to write a letter to the church (my client) stating that
protection is required by Code and is my best advice, but if they choose not
to, I am not responsible for the consequences. 

How have others handled similar situations? The inspection for CO is
schedules for Friday. 

Sent from my iPhone
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread Thom
Personally I call the AHJ with a question.  I have an assembly type V
construction with a new wood entrance being added. My reading of section
xxx.x.x.x of NFPA 13, and 903.x.x of the IBC tell me this area should be
protected with fire sprinklers. The project super say's I don't have to do
it, but when I ask which exception he is referring too he doesn't respond.
Is there an exception that allows this space to remain unprotected? Am I
missing something? Maybe some local ordinance?

You've given the AHJ and yourself an out.

Thom

Subject: RE: Owner refusal


Your call to the AHJ- fine line to walk. If you know em, have a rapport with
em, make the call. If you don't know em from Adam, he may be best friends
with the supt and you've shot yourself in the foot. 

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Recent Antifreeze Letter

2010-10-05 Thread Bill Brooks
I came across this letter regarding the antifreeze situation.

The XX Residence incorporated an automatic sprinkler system in response
to a variance approved by the XX zoning authority.  This automatic
sprinkler system was designed in accordance with NFPA 13D, Standard for the
Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and
Manufactured Homes.  The scope of the system included sprinklers in
residential areas as well as in certain utility areas.  A storage tank with
a pumping system provided the water supply and pressure.  Because of a
concern for freezing conditions in the attic space, a 50% propylene glycol
antifreeze solution was added to the piping (copper).  In addition, attic
sprinkler piping was to be covered with insulating material and also routed
remotely from the eaves.

After a fire incident (resulting in a fatality and a serious injury to
another person) involving a sprinkler system with an antifreeze solution,
NFPA initiated a fire research project to assess the hazard of such systems.
The NFPA Safety Alert is enclosed for your information.  Please note that
although new residential antifreeze systems are not to be designed or
installed until final regulations are issued, guidelines for existing
systems should be followed as described.

In view of the NFPA action it is necessary to advise the client that the
automatic sprinkler system should be assessed and the antifreeze solution
changed to a maximum 40% propylene glycol concentration.  This concentration
would satisfy the NFPA guidelines and also provide protection from freezing
down to a temperature of -30 F.  This should be adequate for all but the
most extreme conditions when the home might be left without power and heat
for an extended period.

XXX (sprinkler company name) has been notified that this information
would be provided to you.  Although a maintenance contract should be in
place for this system, the NFPA Safety Alert would also be brought to the
Owner's attention by their maintenance contractor.

Let me know if I can be of any assistance to you in resolving this potential
safety issue.

Bill Brooks

William N. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
372 Wilett Drive
Severna Park, MD 21146-1904
410-544-3620
410-544-3032 FAX
412-400-6528 Cell


___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread Bill Brooks
You found the canopy 3 days prior to the CO inspection, and your design was
for the building without the canopy?  It sounds like there is a building
official issue here where the owner has gone beyond approved construction
drawings.  I think this is the angle.  Your design matches the scope of the
permit drawings.  Now the building is bigger and the bigger thing might not
have been permitted.

Bill Brooks

William N. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
372 Wilett Drive
Severna Park, MD 21146-1904
410-544-3620
410-544-3032 FAX
412-400-6528 Cell


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd - FPDC
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 10:01 AM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Owner refusal

I  just coming from a church project where they added an 8 x 16 wooden
canopy at the main entry. The project super (and also church member) has
adamantly refused to install sprinklers even though they are required. I
have told him that they are needed by Code, buy he remains defiant. I assume
that the AHJ would pick up on it during final inspection, but can't count on
it. 

My plan is to write a letter to the church (my client) stating that
protection is required by Code and is my best advice, but if they choose not
to, I am not responsible for the consequences. 

How have others handled similar situations? The inspection for CO is
schedules for Friday. 

Sent from my iPhone
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread Todd Williams

Thom,

With all due respect, that schtick won't work. First of all, there is 
no exception as the local authority can only enforce the Code and not 
modify it. Second, the super didn't say the canopy didn't require 
sprinklers, but that he was not going to install them.


It is a much more hostile attitude and the age of reasoning may 
mostly have passed. I was almost kicked off the job this morning for 
interfering with the contractor hanging pipe because we were going 
over changes. The super is doing this part time and his real job is 
building rather large vehicles for the military on second shift. No 
construction experience except having worked as a carpenter at one 
point. The last time I was at the site, we had it out for about 30 
minutes over changes (partial existing building with no access to 
attic or concealed spaces + changes). This is a one-and-done contract 
with no hope for recommendations. My biggest concern is getting paid 
the balance of my contract.


I may just call the AHJ and tell him he might want to pay a visit.



At 12:06 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:

Personally I call the AHJ with a question.  I have an assembly type V
construction with a new wood entrance being added. My reading of section
xxx.x.x.x of NFPA 13, and 903.x.x of the IBC tell me this area should be
protected with fire sprinklers. The project super say's I don't have to do
it, but when I ask which exception he is referring too he doesn't respond.
Is there an exception that allows this space to remain unprotected? Am I
missing something? Maybe some local ordinance?

You've given the AHJ and yourself an out.

Thom

Subject: RE: Owner refusal


Your call to the AHJ- fine line to walk. If you know em, have a rapport with
em, make the call. If you don't know em from Adam, he may be best friends
with the supt and you've shot yourself in the foot.

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread Matthew J. Willis
So you sealed this job?

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:39 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Owner refusal
 
 Thom,
 
 With all due respect, that schtick won't work. First of all, there is
 no exception as the local authority can only enforce the Code and not
 modify it. Second, the super didn't say the canopy didn't require
 sprinklers, but that he was not going to install them.
 
 It is a much more hostile attitude and the age of reasoning may
 mostly have passed. I was almost kicked off the job this morning for
 interfering with the contractor hanging pipe because we were going
 over changes. The super is doing this part time and his real job is
 building rather large vehicles for the military on second shift. No
 construction experience except having worked as a carpenter at one
 point. The last time I was at the site, we had it out for about 30
 minutes over changes (partial existing building with no access to
 attic or concealed spaces + changes). This is a one-and-done contract
 with no hope for recommendations. My biggest concern is getting paid
 the balance of my contract.
 
 I may just call the AHJ and tell him he might want to pay a visit.
 
 
 
 At 12:06 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
 Personally I call the AHJ with a question.  I have an assembly type V
 construction with a new wood entrance being added. My reading of section
 xxx.x.x.x of NFPA 13, and 903.x.x of the IBC tell me this area should be
 protected with fire sprinklers. The project super say's I don't have to
 do
 it, but when I ask which exception he is referring too he doesn't
 respond.
 Is there an exception that allows this space to remain unprotected? Am I
 missing something? Maybe some local ordinance?
 
 You've given the AHJ and yourself an out.
 
 Thom
 
 Subject: RE: Owner refusal
 
 
 Your call to the AHJ- fine line to walk. If you know em, have a rapport
 with
 em, make the call. If you don't know em from Adam, he may be best
 friends
 with the supt and you've shot yourself in the foot.
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
 requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 Todd G. Williams, PE
 Fire Protection Design/Consulting
 Stonington, CT
 860.535.2080
 www.fpdc.com
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date: 10/05/10
 01:34:00

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: [SPAM] - RE: Owner refusal - Found word(s) XXX in the Text body

2010-10-05 Thread John Drucker

Transmit a letter to the Owner/Developer/GC pointing out the deficiency,
cite the adopted code reference, the cost of the modification requesting
how to proceed. When it comes time for hydrotest and/or final inspection
you'll have been proactive advising the client in a timely manner if the
issue arises, and it will eventually.

John Drucker Jr CET
Fire Protection Subcode Official
Fire/Building/Electrical Inspector
Borough of Red Bank, NJ 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd
Williams
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 1:39 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: [SPAM] - RE: Owner refusal - Found word(s) XXX in the Text body

Thom,

With all due respect, that schtick won't work. First of all, there is no
exception as the local authority can only enforce the Code and not
modify it. Second, the super didn't say the canopy didn't require
sprinklers, but that he was not going to install them.

It is a much more hostile attitude and the age of reasoning may mostly
have passed. I was almost kicked off the job this morning for
interfering with the contractor hanging pipe because we were going
over changes. The super is doing this part time and his real job is
building rather large vehicles for the military on second shift. No
construction experience except having worked as a carpenter at one
point. The last time I was at the site, we had it out for about 30
minutes over changes (partial existing building with no access to attic
or concealed spaces + changes). This is a one-and-done contract with no
hope for recommendations. My biggest concern is getting paid the balance
of my contract.

I may just call the AHJ and tell him he might want to pay a visit.



At 12:06 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
Personally I call the AHJ with a question.  I have an assembly type V 
construction with a new wood entrance being added. My reading of 
section xxx.x.x.x of NFPA 13, and 903.x.x of the IBC tell me this area 
should be protected with fire sprinklers. The project super say's I 
don't have to do it, but when I ask which exception he is referring too
he doesn't respond.
Is there an exception that allows this space to remain unprotected? Am 
I missing something? Maybe some local ordinance?

You've given the AHJ and yourself an out.

Thom

Subject: RE: Owner refusal


Your call to the AHJ- fine line to walk. If you know em, have a rapport

with em, make the call. If you don't know em from Adam, he may be best 
friends with the supt and you've shot yourself in the foot.

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email 
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY:
This email message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and 
confidential, nor is it, unless specifically stated, intended to be relied upon 
by any person or persons other than the individual or entity named above and no 
warranties or representations are made or intended to persons or entities not 
named above.  If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us immediately by telephone, return this message to the address 
above and delete all copies.  Thank you.

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread Todd Williams
I drew and stamped the original job (before it got hostile). the 
canopy is the addition.



At 01:59 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:

So you sealed this job?





Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 12:39 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Owner refusal
 
 Thom,
 
 With all due respect, that schtick won't work. First of all, there is
 no exception as the local authority can only enforce the Code and not
 modify it. Second, the super didn't say the canopy didn't require
 sprinklers, but that he was not going to install them.
 
 It is a much more hostile attitude and the age of reasoning may
 mostly have passed. I was almost kicked off the job this morning for
 interfering with the contractor hanging pipe because we were going
 over changes. The super is doing this part time and his real job is
 building rather large vehicles for the military on second shift. No
 construction experience except having worked as a carpenter at one
 point. The last time I was at the site, we had it out for about 30
 minutes over changes (partial existing building with no access to
 attic or concealed spaces + changes). This is a one-and-done contract
 with no hope for recommendations. My biggest concern is getting paid
 the balance of my contract.
 
 I may just call the AHJ and tell him he might want to pay a visit.
 
 
 
 At 12:06 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
 Personally I call the AHJ with a question.  I have an assembly type V
 construction with a new wood entrance being added. My reading of section
 xxx.x.x.x of NFPA 13, and 903.x.x of the IBC tell me this area should be
 protected with fire sprinklers. The project super say's I don't have to
 do
 it, but when I ask which exception he is referring too he doesn't
 respond.
 Is there an exception that allows this space to remain unprotected? Am I
 missing something? Maybe some local ordinance?
 
 You've given the AHJ and yourself an out.
 
 Thom
 
 Subject: RE: Owner refusal
 
 
 Your call to the AHJ- fine line to walk. If you know em, have a rapport
 with
 em, make the call. If you don't know em from Adam, he may be best
 friends
 with the supt and you've shot yourself in the foot.
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
 requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 Todd G. Williams, PE
 Fire Protection Design/Consulting
 Stonington, CT
 860.535.2080
 www.fpdc.com
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date: 10/05/10
 01:34:00

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Owner refusal

2010-10-05 Thread lamarvaughn
Todd,
You may need to go around the sudo-super to the person who contracted your 
services or the person responsible for paying the bills if getting paid is a 
concern.George is right in that the AHJ and super may be on the same side,which 
is unfortunate and he/she may be of no help.This sure is a nasty situation for 
dealing with someone who is supposed to be doing God's work.CYA  PRAY.

Lamar Vaughn


 Todd Williams t...@fpdc.com wrote: 
 Thom,
 
 With all due respect, that schtick won't work. First of all, there is 
 no exception as the local authority can only enforce the Code and not 
 modify it. Second, the super didn't say the canopy didn't require 
 sprinklers, but that he was not going to install them.
 
 It is a much more hostile attitude and the age of reasoning may 
 mostly have passed. I was almost kicked off the job this morning for 
 interfering with the contractor hanging pipe because we were going 
 over changes. The super is doing this part time and his real job is 
 building rather large vehicles for the military on second shift. No 
 construction experience except having worked as a carpenter at one 
 point. The last time I was at the site, we had it out for about 30 
 minutes over changes (partial existing building with no access to 
 attic or concealed spaces + changes). This is a one-and-done contract 
 with no hope for recommendations. My biggest concern is getting paid 
 the balance of my contract.
 
 I may just call the AHJ and tell him he might want to pay a visit.
 
 
 
 At 12:06 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
 Personally I call the AHJ with a question.  I have an assembly type V
 construction with a new wood entrance being added. My reading of section
 xxx.x.x.x of NFPA 13, and 903.x.x of the IBC tell me this area should be
 protected with fire sprinklers. The project super say's I don't have to do
 it, but when I ask which exception he is referring too he doesn't respond.
 Is there an exception that allows this space to remain unprotected? Am I
 missing something? Maybe some local ordinance?
 
 You've given the AHJ and yourself an out.
 
 Thom
 
 Subject: RE: Owner refusal
 
 
 Your call to the AHJ- fine line to walk. If you know em, have a rapport with
 em, make the call. If you don't know em from Adam, he may be best friends
 with the supt and you've shot yourself in the foot.
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 Todd G. Williams, PE
 Fire Protection Design/Consulting
 Stonington, CT
 860.535.2080
 www.fpdc.com
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Brian Harris
If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
the calculations per 12.8.2?

 

Brian Harris

First Defense Fire Protection

11957 Ramah Church Road

Huntersville, NC 28078

Phone: 704.948.3506

Fax: 704.948.3507

Nicet # 128476

 





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Matthew J. Willis
It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all other
hose/calculations may apply.

R/
Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: Hose Demand
 
 If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
 described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
 the calculations per 12.8.2?
 
 
 
 Brian Harris
 
 First Defense Fire Protection
 
 11957 Ramah Church Road
 
 Huntersville, NC 28078
 
 Phone: 704.948.3506
 
 Fax: 704.948.3507
 
 Nicet # 128476
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date: 10/05/10
 01:34:00

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Jeff Hewitt
Is it actually a private separate water supply, or just a private water main
that is ultimately fed from a public utility source?

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Hose Demand

If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
the calculations per 12.8.2?

 

Brian Harris

First Defense Fire Protection

11957 Ramah Church Road

Huntersville, NC 28078

Phone: 704.948.3506

Fax: 704.948.3507

Nicet # 128476

 





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Brian Harris
Matt-
On this particular project the calculations will not work with the existing
pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the system will
work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.
 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
Willis
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all other
hose/calculations may apply.

R/
Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: Hose Demand
 
 If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
 described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
 the calculations per 12.8.2?
 
 
 
 Brian Harris
 
 First Defense Fire Protection
 
 11957 Ramah Church Road
 
 Huntersville, NC 28078
 
 Phone: 704.948.3506
 
 Fax: 704.948.3507
 
 Nicet # 128476
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date: 10/05/10
 01:34:00

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Matthew J. Willis
12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service
main supply sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to
accommodate inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance
shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.


Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.

Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 Matt-
 On this particular project the calculations will not work with the
 existing
 pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the system
 will
 work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?
 
 Brian Harris
 FDFP Inc.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
 Willis
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all
 other
 hose/calculations may apply.
 
 R/
 Matt
 
 
 
 
 
 Matthew J. Willis, CET
 Automatic Fire Sprinklers
 Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
 318-387-1134 Voice
 318-816-1087 Mobile
 318-387-1163 Facsimile
 m...@norredfire.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
  boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: Hose Demand
  
  If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
  described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream
 from
  the calculations per 12.8.2?
  
  
  
  Brian Harris
  
  First Defense Fire Protection
  
  11957 Ramah Church Road
  
  Huntersville, NC 28078
  
  Phone: 704.948.3506
  
  Fax: 704.948.3507
  
  Nicet # 128476
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ===
  Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
  (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
  http://www.pctools.com/
  ===
  ___
  Sprinklerforum mailing list
  Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
  
  For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
  
  To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
 requ...@firesprinkler.org
  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date:
 10/05/10
  01:34:00
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date: 10/05/10
 01:34:00

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Brian Harris
It's a private water main that is ultimately fed from a public utility
source. If I'm reading 3.8.1.11 correctly 12.8.2 should apply?

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.
 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Hewitt
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:55 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

Is it actually a private separate water supply, or just a private water main
that is ultimately fed from a public utility source?

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Hose Demand

If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
the calculations per 12.8.2?

 

Brian Harris

First Defense Fire Protection

11957 Ramah Church Road

Huntersville, NC 28078

Phone: 704.948.3506

Fax: 704.948.3507

Nicet # 128476

 





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Brian Harris
Matt-
I don't understand why you would not have to take hose demand into
consideration when sizing a pump but that exclusion would not apply to an
existing one.

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.
 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
Willis
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service
main supply sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to
accommodate inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance
shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.


Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.

Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 Matt-
 On this particular project the calculations will not work with the
 existing
 pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the system
 will
 work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?
 
 Brian Harris
 FDFP Inc.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
 Willis
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all
 other
 hose/calculations may apply.
 
 R/
 Matt
 
 
 
 
 
 Matthew J. Willis, CET
 Automatic Fire Sprinklers
 Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
 318-387-1134 Voice
 318-816-1087 Mobile
 318-387-1163 Facsimile
 m...@norredfire.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
  boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: Hose Demand
  
  If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
  described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream
 from
  the calculations per 12.8.2?
  
  
  
  Brian Harris
  
  First Defense Fire Protection
  
  11957 Ramah Church Road
  
  Huntersville, NC 28078
  
  Phone: 704.948.3506
  
  Fax: 704.948.3507
  
  Nicet # 128476
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ===
  Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
  (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
  http://www.pctools.com/
  ===
  ___
  Sprinklerforum mailing list
  Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
  
  For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
  
  To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
 requ...@firesprinkler.org
  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date:
 10/05/10
  01:34:00
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date: 10/05/10
 01:34:00

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses 

RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Eric Tysinger
I think this is meant to refer to inside and/or outside hose that is supplied 
from a hydrant or hose valve down stream of the pump. I think that you would 
still be required to account for it from a hydrant prior to the pump.


Thanks,
Eric Tysinger CET
NICET III - 108988
Designer
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
4370 Motorsport Drive
Concord, NC 28027
p: (704)782-3032 x1751
f: (704)795-6838
C: (239)633-9703

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J. Willis
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service main supply 
sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to accommodate inside and outside 
hose. Such hose allowance shall be considered in evaluating the available water 
supplies.


Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.

Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
 [mailto:sprinklerforum- boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian 
 Harris
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 Matt-
 On this particular project the calculations will not work with the 
 existing pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream 
 the system will work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?
 
 Brian Harris
 FDFP Inc.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
 Willis
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all 
 other hose/calculations may apply.
 
 R/
 Matt
 
 
 
 
 
 Matthew J. Willis, CET
 Automatic Fire Sprinklers
 Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
 318-387-1134 Voice
 318-816-1087 Mobile
 318-387-1163 Facsimile
 m...@norredfire.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
  [mailto:sprinklerforum- boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of 
  Brian Harris
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: Hose Demand
  
  If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire 
  main as described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the 
  hose stream
 from
  the calculations per 12.8.2?
  
  
  
  Brian Harris
  
  First Defense Fire Protection
  
  11957 Ramah Church Road
  
  Huntersville, NC 28078
  
  Phone: 704.948.3506
  
  Fax: 704.948.3507
  
  Nicet # 128476
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ===
  Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
  (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010) 
  http://www.pctools.com/ === 
  ___
  Sprinklerforum mailing list
  Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
  
  For Technical Assistance, send an email to: 
  supp...@firesprinkler.org
  
  To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
 requ...@firesprinkler.org
  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) No virus found in 
  this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date:
 10/05/10
  01:34:00
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email 
 to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010) 
 http://www.pctools.com/ ===
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010) 
 http://www.pctools.com/ === 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email 
 to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date: 
 10/05/10 01:34:00

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org

RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Todd Williams

Is there any place on the system to take a hose demand?


At 03:54 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:

Is it actually a private separate water supply, or just a private water main
that is ultimately fed from a public utility source?

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Hose Demand

If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
the calculations per 12.8.2?



Brian Harris

First Defense Fire Protection

11957 Ramah Church Road

Huntersville, NC 28078

Phone: 704.948.3506

Fax: 704.948.3507

Nicet # 128476







===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Matthew J. Willis
Let's look at the last sentence again...,



Such hose allowance
shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.

 
Right now you are evaluating a water supply, yes?, not sizing a pump.

R/Matt
 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:58 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 Matt-
 I don't understand why you would not have to take hose demand into
 consideration when sizing a pump but that exclusion would not apply to an
 existing one.
 
 Brian Harris
 FDFP Inc.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
 Willis
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service
 main supply sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to
 accommodate inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance
 shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.
 
 
 Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.
 
 Matt
 
 
 
 
 
 Matthew J. Willis, CET
 Automatic Fire Sprinklers
 Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
 318-387-1134 Voice
 318-816-1087 Mobile
 318-387-1163 Facsimile
 m...@norredfire.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
  boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: RE: Hose Demand
  
  Matt-
  On this particular project the calculations will not work with the
  existing
  pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the system
  will
  work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?
  
  Brian Harris
  FDFP Inc.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
  [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew
 J.
  Willis
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: RE: Hose Demand
  
  It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all
  other
  hose/calculations may apply.
  
  R/
  Matt
  
  
  
  
  
  Matthew J. Willis, CET
  Automatic Fire Sprinklers
  Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
  318-387-1134 Voice
  318-816-1087 Mobile
  318-387-1163 Facsimile
  m...@norredfire.com
  
   -Original Message-
   From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-
   boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
   Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
   To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
   Subject: Hose Demand
   
   If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main
 as
   described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose
 stream
  from
   the calculations per 12.8.2?
   
   
   
   Brian Harris
   
   First Defense Fire Protection
   
   11957 Ramah Church Road
   
   Huntersville, NC 28078
   
   Phone: 704.948.3506
   
   Fax: 704.948.3507
   
   Nicet # 128476
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   ===
   Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
   (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
   http://www.pctools.com/
   ===
   ___
   Sprinklerforum mailing list
   Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
   http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
   
   For Technical Assistance, send an email to:
 supp...@firesprinkler.org
   
   To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
  requ...@firesprinkler.org
   (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
   No virus found in this incoming message.
   Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
   Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date:
  10/05/10
   01:34:00
  
  ___
  Sprinklerforum mailing list
  Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
  
  For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
  
  To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
 requ...@firesprinkler.org
  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
  
  
  
  
  
  ===
  Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
  (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
  http://www.pctools.com/
  ===
  
  
  
  
  
  ===
  Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
  (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
  http://www.pctools.com/
  ===
  ___
  Sprinklerforum mailing list
  Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  

RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Brian Harris
This is an addition to an existing building so I can tie the inside hose
valves to the existing system side and not have them in the calc's for the
new side. I was hoping that I could eliminate the 250 outside hose.

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.
 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:02 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

Is there any place on the system to take a hose demand?


At 03:54 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
Is it actually a private separate water supply, or just a private water
main
that is ultimately fed from a public utility source?

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Hose Demand

If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
the calculations per 12.8.2?



Brian Harris

First Defense Fire Protection

11957 Ramah Church Road

Huntersville, NC 28078

Phone: 704.948.3506

Fax: 704.948.3507

Nicet # 128476







===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Todd Williams
If there is no place on the system (hydrant) to take a hose stream, 
then it can be eliminated. If you have hydrants, either before or 
after the pump, the hose demand needs to be included.




At 04:08 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:

This is an addition to an existing building so I can tie the inside hose
valves to the existing system side and not have them in the calc's for the
new side. I was hoping that I could eliminate the 250 outside hose.

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:02 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

Is there any place on the system to take a hose demand?


At 03:54 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
Is it actually a private separate water supply, or just a private water
main
that is ultimately fed from a public utility source?

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Hose Demand

If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
the calculations per 12.8.2?



Brian Harris

First Defense Fire Protection

11957 Ramah Church Road

Huntersville, NC 28078

Phone: 704.948.3506

Fax: 704.948.3507

Nicet # 128476







===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Craig.Prahl
If there's no place on the system side of the pump to connect a hose, either a 
system hose valve inside or hydrant outside there is no need to calc the hose 
demand.  It says if the system SUPPLIES SPRINKLERS ONLY you don't need to 
factor hose stream in when sizing the pump.  Size the pump based on Sprinkler 
flow demand only.



Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
http://www.ch2m.com 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J. Willis
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service
main supply sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to
accommodate inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance
shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.


Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.

Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 Matt-
 On this particular project the calculations will not work with the
 existing
 pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the system
 will
 work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?
 
 Brian Harris
 FDFP Inc.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
 Willis
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all
 other
 hose/calculations may apply.
 
 R/
 Matt
 
 
 
 
 
 Matthew J. Willis, CET
 Automatic Fire Sprinklers
 Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
 318-387-1134 Voice
 318-816-1087 Mobile
 318-387-1163 Facsimile
 m...@norredfire.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
  boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: Hose Demand
  
  If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
  described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream
 from
  the calculations per 12.8.2?
  
  
  
  Brian Harris
  
  First Defense Fire Protection
  
  11957 Ramah Church Road
  
  Huntersville, NC 28078
  
  Phone: 704.948.3506
  
  Fax: 704.948.3507
  
  Nicet # 128476
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ===
  Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
  (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
  http://www.pctools.com/
  ===
  ___
  Sprinklerforum mailing list
  Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
  
  For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
  
  To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
 requ...@firesprinkler.org
  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date:
 10/05/10
  01:34:00
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date: 10/05/10
 01:34:00


Re: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Travis Mack, SET
 Could it possibly be that there is a steep water supply curve?  For 
instance, he may have 40 psi at system flow on the city main, but when 
you take 250 gpm off for hose allowance from the water supply (point of 
connection to the city main), then he may only have 20 psi left.  This 
could keep the system from being able to be calculated below the curve.  
We have run into this situation on some pretty 'crappy' water supply curves.


On 10/5/2010 1:15 PM, craig.pr...@ch2m.com wrote:

If there's no place on the system side of the pump to connect a hose, either a 
system hose valve inside or hydrant outside there is no need to calc the hose 
demand.  It says if the system SUPPLIES SPRINKLERS ONLY you don't need to 
factor hose stream in when sizing the pump.  Size the pump based on Sprinkler 
flow demand only.



Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
http://www.ch2m.com

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J. Willis
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service
main supply sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to
accommodate inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance
shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.


Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.

Matt





Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

Matt-
On this particular project the calculations will not work with the
existing
pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the system
will
work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
Willis
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all
other
hose/calculations may apply.

R/
Matt





Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Hose Demand

If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream

from

the calculations per 12.8.2?



Brian Harris

First Defense Fire Protection

11957 Ramah Church Road

Huntersville, NC 28078

Phone: 704.948.3506

Fax: 704.948.3507

Nicet # 128476







===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-

requ...@firesprinkler.org

(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date:

10/05/10

01:34:00

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, 

RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Todd Williams

Craig,

If the hydrant is installed on the supply side, wouldn't you have to 
include that in your hydraulic calculations? A hose stream would be 
taken from there as that could impact the final output of the pump, 
which could in turn impact the pump sizing. It may not affect the 
flow but it could the pressure.



At 04:15 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
If there's no place on the system side of the pump to connect a 
hose, either a system hose valve inside or hydrant outside there is 
no need to calc the hose demand.  It says if the system SUPPLIES 
SPRINKLERS ONLY you don't need to factor hose stream in when sizing 
the pump.  Size the pump based on Sprinkler flow demand only.




Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
http://www.ch2m.com

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of 
Matthew J. Willis

Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service
main supply sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to
accommodate inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance
shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.


Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.

Matt





Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 Matt-
 On this particular project the calculations will not work with the
 existing
 pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the system
 will
 work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?
 
 Brian Harris
 FDFP Inc.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
 Willis
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all
 other
 hose/calculations may apply.
 
 R/
 Matt
 
 
 
 
 
 Matthew J. Willis, CET
 Automatic Fire Sprinklers
 Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
 318-387-1134 Voice
 318-816-1087 Mobile
 318-387-1163 Facsimile
 m...@norredfire.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
  boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: Hose Demand
  
  If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
  described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream
 from
  the calculations per 12.8.2?
  
  
  
  Brian Harris
  
  First Defense Fire Protection
  
  11957 Ramah Church Road
  
  Huntersville, NC 28078
  
  Phone: 704.948.3506
  
  Fax: 704.948.3507
  
  Nicet # 128476
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ===
  Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
  (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
  http://www.pctools.com/
  ===
  ___
  Sprinklerforum mailing list
  Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
  
  For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
  
  To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
 requ...@firesprinkler.org
  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date:
 10/05/10
  01:34:00
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
 (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
 http://www.pctools.com/
 ===
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: 

RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Eric Tysinger
I agree, but you would still have to account for the required hose allowance 
(i.e. 100, 250, 500) prior to the fire pump if there are hydrants present. With 
tanks and other stored water sources without hydrants you would not have too. 
If the FD hooks up to those hydrants and takes out 250 then your supply to the 
pump would be 250 short if not accounted for. 


Thanks,
Eric Tysinger CET
NICET III - 108988
Designer
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
4370 Motorsport Drive
Concord, NC 28027
p: (704)782-3032 x1751
f: (704)795-6838
C: (239)633-9703

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of 
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:15 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

If there's no place on the system side of the pump to connect a hose, either a 
system hose valve inside or hydrant outside there is no need to calc the hose 
demand.  It says if the system SUPPLIES SPRINKLERS ONLY you don't need to 
factor hose stream in when sizing the pump.  Size the pump based on Sprinkler 
flow demand only.



Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
http://www.ch2m.com 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J. Willis
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service main supply 
sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to accommodate inside and outside 
hose. Such hose allowance shall be considered in evaluating the available water 
supplies.


Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.

Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
 [mailto:sprinklerforum- boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian 
 Harris
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 Matt-
 On this particular project the calculations will not work with the 
 existing pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream 
 the system will work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?
 
 Brian Harris
 FDFP Inc.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
 Willis
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all 
 other hose/calculations may apply.
 
 R/
 Matt
 
 
 
 
 
 Matthew J. Willis, CET
 Automatic Fire Sprinklers
 Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
 318-387-1134 Voice
 318-816-1087 Mobile
 318-387-1163 Facsimile
 m...@norredfire.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
  [mailto:sprinklerforum- boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of 
  Brian Harris
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: Hose Demand
  
  If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire 
  main as described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the 
  hose stream
 from
  the calculations per 12.8.2?
  
  
  
  Brian Harris
  
  First Defense Fire Protection
  
  11957 Ramah Church Road
  
  Huntersville, NC 28078
  
  Phone: 704.948.3506
  
  Fax: 704.948.3507
  
  Nicet # 128476
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ===
  Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
  (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010) 
  http://www.pctools.com/ === 
  ___
  Sprinklerforum mailing list
  Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
  
  For Technical Assistance, send an email to: 
  supp...@firesprinkler.org
  
  To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
 requ...@firesprinkler.org
  (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) No virus found in 
  this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3178 - Release Date:
 10/05/10
  01:34:00
 
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
 
 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
 
 To Unsubscribe, send an email 
 to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 
 
 
 
 
 ===
 Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware 

RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Craig.Prahl
Yes, but read what I said, If there is no hydrant or other hose valve 
connection on the SYSTEM side of the pump you don't add the hose demand into 
the calc.  

If there was a hydrant or hose connection on the system side of then naturally 
you'd add it to the sprinkler flow and calc. it.  But he said he didn't have 
that condition.

If there was a hydrant on the municipal side of the pump that could be used for 
hose stream then that would affect the suction flow and pressure to the pump 
and he'd have to know that in order to size the pump.  Still doesn't have 
anything to do with hose stream on the discharge side of the pump.

Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
http://www.ch2m.com 


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:22 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

Craig,

If the hydrant is installed on the supply side, wouldn't you have to 
include that in your hydraulic calculations? A hose stream would be 
taken from there as that could impact the final output of the pump, 
which could in turn impact the pump sizing. It may not affect the 
flow but it could the pressure.


At 04:15 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
If there's no place on the system side of the pump to connect a 
hose, either a system hose valve inside or hydrant outside there is 
no need to calc the hose demand.  It says if the system SUPPLIES 
SPRINKLERS ONLY you don't need to factor hose stream in when sizing 
the pump.  Size the pump based on Sprinkler flow demand only.



Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
http://www.ch2m.com

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of 
Matthew J. Willis
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service
main supply sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to
accommodate inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance
shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.


Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.

Matt





Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
  boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: RE: Hose Demand
  
  Matt-
  On this particular project the calculations will not work with the
  existing
  pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the system
  will
  work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?
  
  Brian Harris
  FDFP Inc.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
  [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
  Willis
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: RE: Hose Demand
  
  It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all
  other
  hose/calculations may apply.
  
  R/
  Matt
  
  
  
  
  
  Matthew J. Willis, CET
  Automatic Fire Sprinklers
  Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
  318-387-1134 Voice
  318-816-1087 Mobile
  318-387-1163 Facsimile
  m...@norredfire.com
  
   -Original Message-
   From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
   boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
   Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
   To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
   Subject: Hose Demand
   
   If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
   described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream
  from
   the calculations per 12.8.2?
   
   
   
   Brian Harris
   
   First Defense Fire Protection
   
   11957 Ramah Church Road
   
   Huntersville, NC 28078
   
   Phone: 704.948.3506
   
   Fax: 704.948.3507
   
   Nicet # 128476
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   ===
   Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
   (Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
   http://www.pctools.com/
   ===
   ___
   Sprinklerforum mailing list
   Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
   http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
   
   For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org
   
   To Unsubscribe, 

RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Jeff Hewitt
I don't see where you get relief from the hose allowance.  It's all from a
city source so it has to be accounted for, somewhere.  You can only squeeze
out so much, and if it is not there, it's not there.  Not including it means
not accounting for it, which is not correct in my opinion.

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:09 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

This is an addition to an existing building so I can tie the inside hose
valves to the existing system side and not have them in the calc's for the
new side. I was hoping that I could eliminate the 250 outside hose.

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.
 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:02 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

Is there any place on the system to take a hose demand?


At 03:54 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
Is it actually a private separate water supply, or just a private water
main
that is ultimately fed from a public utility source?

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Hose Demand

If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
the calculations per 12.8.2?



Brian Harris

First Defense Fire Protection

11957 Ramah Church Road

Huntersville, NC 28078

Phone: 704.948.3506

Fax: 704.948.3507

Nicet # 128476







===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Todd Williams
According to Brian, this is an existing pump, so we are dealing with 
an existing condition. How the pump was previously sized we don't 
know or care. The second sentence of 12.8.2 states: Such hose 
allowance shall be considered in evaluating the available water 
supply. Section 12.8.3 further states: Water allowance for outside 
hose shall be added to the sprinkler requirement at the connection to 
the city main or a yard hydrant, whichever is closer.  The latter is 
irrespective of a pump being on the system or not. Based on this, the 
hydraulic calculations he needs to prepare for the system would have 
to include a hose demand before the pump. The initial question was 
am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from the calculations per 
12.8.2?  The answer I would say is no, but it needs to be included 
at the location per 12.8.3, whatever side of the pump it is on.




At 04:28 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
Yes, but read what I said, If there is no hydrant or other hose 
valve connection on the SYSTEM side of the pump you don't add the 
hose demand into the calc.


If there was a hydrant or hose connection on the system side of then 
naturally you'd add it to the sprinkler flow and calc. it.  But he 
said he didn't have that condition.


If there was a hydrant on the municipal side of the pump that could 
be used for hose stream then that would affect the suction flow and 
pressure to the pump and he'd have to know that in order to size the 
pump.  Still doesn't have anything to do with hose stream on the 
discharge side of the pump.


Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
http://www.ch2m.com


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams

Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:22 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

Craig,

If the hydrant is installed on the supply side, wouldn't you have to
include that in your hydraulic calculations? A hose stream would be
taken from there as that could impact the final output of the pump,
which could in turn impact the pump sizing. It may not affect the
flow but it could the pressure.


At 04:15 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
If there's no place on the system side of the pump to connect a
hose, either a system hose valve inside or hydrant outside there is
no need to calc the hose demand.  It says if the system SUPPLIES
SPRINKLERS ONLY you don't need to factor hose stream in when sizing
the pump.  Size the pump based on Sprinkler flow demand only.



Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
http://www.ch2m.com

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
Matthew J. Willis
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service
main supply sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to
accommodate inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance
shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.


Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.

Matt





Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
  boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: RE: Hose Demand
  
  Matt-
  On this particular project the calculations will not work with the
  existing
  pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the system
  will
  work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?
  
  Brian Harris
  FDFP Inc.
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
  [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of 
Matthew J.

  Willis
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:40 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: RE: Hose Demand
  
  It says the Pump need not be sized to accommodate..., looks like all
  other
  hose/calculations may apply.
  
  R/
  Matt
  
  
  
  
  
  Matthew J. Willis, CET
  Automatic Fire Sprinklers
  Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
  318-387-1134 Voice
  318-816-1087 Mobile
  318-387-1163 Facsimile
  m...@norredfire.com
  
   -Original Message-
   From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org 
[mailto:sprinklerforum-

   boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
   Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
   To: 

RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Matthew J. Willis
Yep,

You still have inside and outside hose for a combined total for a specific
duration. You can omit INSIDE if no provision is there, but the total must
be met.

R/
Matt

 

 

Matthew J. Willis, CET
Automatic Fire Sprinklers
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-816-1087 Mobile
318-387-1163 Facsimile
m...@norredfire.com

 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
 boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:55 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 According to Brian, this is an existing pump, so we are dealing with
 an existing condition. How the pump was previously sized we don't
 know or care. The second sentence of 12.8.2 states: Such hose
 allowance shall be considered in evaluating the available water
 supply. Section 12.8.3 further states: Water allowance for outside
 hose shall be added to the sprinkler requirement at the connection to
 the city main or a yard hydrant, whichever is closer.  The latter is
 irrespective of a pump being on the system or not. Based on this, the
 hydraulic calculations he needs to prepare for the system would have
 to include a hose demand before the pump. The initial question was
 am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from the calculations per
 12.8.2?  The answer I would say is no, but it needs to be included
 at the location per 12.8.3, whatever side of the pump it is on.
 
 
 
 At 04:28 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
 Yes, but read what I said, If there is no hydrant or other hose
 valve connection on the SYSTEM side of the pump you don't add the
 hose demand into the calc.
 
 If there was a hydrant or hose connection on the system side of then
 naturally you'd add it to the sprinkler flow and calc. it.  But he
 said he didn't have that condition.
 
 If there was a hydrant on the municipal side of the pump that could
 be used for hose stream then that would affect the suction flow and
 pressure to the pump and he'd have to know that in order to size the
 pump.  Still doesn't have anything to do with hose stream on the
 discharge side of the pump.
 
 Craig L. Prahl, CET
 Fire Protection Specialist
 Mechanical Department
 CH2MHILL
 Lockwood Greene
 1500 International Drive
 Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
 Direct - 864.599.4102
 Fax - 864.599.8439
 craig.pr...@ch2m.com
 http://www.ch2m.com
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd
 Williams
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:22 PM
 To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 Subject: RE: Hose Demand
 
 Craig,
 
 If the hydrant is installed on the supply side, wouldn't you have to
 include that in your hydraulic calculations? A hose stream would be
 taken from there as that could impact the final output of the pump,
 which could in turn impact the pump sizing. It may not affect the
 flow but it could the pressure.
 
 
 At 04:15 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
  If there's no place on the system side of the pump to connect a
  hose, either a system hose valve inside or hydrant outside there is
  no need to calc the hose demand.  It says if the system SUPPLIES
  SPRINKLERS ONLY you don't need to factor hose stream in when sizing
  the pump.  Size the pump based on Sprinkler flow demand only.
  
  
  
  Craig L. Prahl, CET
  Fire Protection Specialist
  Mechanical Department
  CH2MHILL
  Lockwood Greene
  1500 International Drive
  Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
  Direct - 864.599.4102
  Fax - 864.599.8439
  craig.pr...@ch2m.com
  http://www.ch2m.com
  
  -Original Message-
  From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
  [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
  Matthew J. Willis
  Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 PM
  To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
  Subject: RE: Hose Demand
  
  12.8.2 Where pumps taking suction from a private fire service
  main supply sprinklers only, the pump need not be sized to
  accommodate inside and outside hose. Such hose allowance
  shall be considered in evaluating the available water supplies.
  
  
  Unless you are sizing a pump, I do not think so.
  
  Matt
  
  
  
  
  
  Matthew J. Willis, CET
  Automatic Fire Sprinklers
  Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
  318-387-1134 Voice
  318-816-1087 Mobile
  318-387-1163 Facsimile
  m...@norredfire.com
  
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
 [mailto:sprinklerforum-
boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:46 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

Matt-
On this particular project the calculations will not work with the
existing
pump if hose stream is figured in, without the hose stream the
 system
will
work.  Can 12.8.2 be applied?

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.


-Original Message-
From: 

RE: Hose Demand

2010-10-05 Thread Brian Harris
Jeff-
I guess it was just wishful thinking, that's why I was looking for others
opinions. Thanks for the help.

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.
 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Hewitt
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 5:03 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

I don't see where you get relief from the hose allowance.  It's all from a
city source so it has to be accounted for, somewhere.  You can only squeeze
out so much, and if it is not there, it's not there.  Not including it means
not accounting for it, which is not correct in my opinion.

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?


-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:09 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

This is an addition to an existing building so I can tie the inside hose
valves to the existing system side and not have them in the calc's for the
new side. I was hoping that I could eliminate the 250 outside hose.

Brian Harris
FDFP Inc.
 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:02 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Hose Demand

Is there any place on the system to take a hose demand?


At 03:54 PM 10/5/2010, you wrote:
Is it actually a private separate water supply, or just a private water
main
that is ultimately fed from a public utility source?

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Brian Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:35 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Hose Demand

If I have a system with a pump that is fed from a private fire main as
described in 3.8.1.11 (2007) am I allowed to exclude the hose stream from
the calculations per 12.8.2?



Brian Harris

First Defense Fire Protection

11957 Ramah Church Road

Huntersville, NC 28078

Phone: 704.948.3506

Fax: 704.948.3507

Nicet # 128476







===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===





===
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16010)
http://www.pctools.com/
===
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send 

RE: ESFR Dry Pendents

2010-10-05 Thread Fletcher, Ron
Viking supplies two pieces of foam about 3/4 thick that is 6 diameter.
It goes on top of the freezer panel and against the ceiling on the
inside. I just wanted to see if any forumites had some real world
experience with these things. This our first time using them.


Ron Fletcher
Aero Automatic
Phoenix, AZ

 

-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron
Greenman
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 2:45 PM
To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: ESFR Dry Pendents

Ron,

I don't have any specific experience but think this through. If you
insulate the dry barrel you have effectively created a situation where
the cold from the freezer dissipates from the barrel slower than it
would otherwise and exacerbates the chances that the cold will migrate
into the wet portion of the system at a greater rate and thereby run
the risk of freezing the wet section. I think you'd be better off with
a foam donut at the point where the dry barrel enters the freezer
box to mitigate against moisture running down the barrel but I'd check
with Viking first.

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Fletcher, Ron rfletc...@aerofire.com
wrote:
 Has anyone had experience with the Viking ESFR dry pendent? We have
been
 asked by the building owner if there is any problem with condensation
 forming and running into the freezer from the ambient area above. We
 have installed them according to Vikings' installation instructions so
 we are hoping everything will be fine. The owner wanted the pipe leg
 above the freezer box to be insulated, Viking says no. It may be dry
 here but the temp difference on a hot day could be -10F to +120F.

 Ron Fletcher
 Aero Automatic
 Phoenix, AZ
 ___
 Sprinklerforum mailing list
 Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
 http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

 For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

 To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
 (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)




-- 
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

rgreen...@bates.ctc.edu

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
AFSA, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, NFSA, AFAA, ASEE, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis
Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: supp...@firesprinkler.org

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:sprinklerforum-requ...@firesprinkler.org
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)