Re: [sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Simon Slavin]

On 25 May 2016, at 2:29pm, Jonathan Moules  wrote:

> But then what would the alternative be?
> The poster doesn't choose to have the absurd signature; it's an absurd 
> corporate policy because their lawyers insist on erring on the side of 
> caution and have a relatively spineless interpretation of the law.

The rules of his company say that he is forbidden from sending messages to a 
public forum via email.  If this makes it difficult for him to do his job, he 
must complain to his boss.

Simon.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Jonathan Moules]

Hi Simon,
But then what would the alternative be?
The poster doesn't choose to have the absurd signature; it's an absurd 
corporate policy because their lawyers insist on erring on the side of caution 
and have a relatively spineless interpretation of the law.

I'm not sure it is right for the list to ask (let alone require) people to send 
work-related emails from their personal accounts. Unless you're a politician 
trying to get around various FOI and/or data retention laws, I personally think 
a separation of work and personal emails is healthy.

Of course that's ignoring the fact that many organisations actually block 
"personal" email access from work anyway and/or forbid using them for work 
related purposes.
Cheers,
Jonathan


 On Tue, 24 May 2016 20:23:56 +0100 Simon Slavin 
slav...@bigfraud.org wrote  

 
On 24 May 2016, at 7:46pm, Kasajian, Kenneth 
kenneth.kasaj...@schneider-electric.com wrote: 
 
 It's funny how many messages there are here about the signature of my 
e-mail (which I cannot control) 
 
Then please stop posting to public fora from that account. 
 
Simon. 
___ 
sqlite-users mailing list 
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org 
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users 





___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

[sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Tim Streater]

On 24 May 2016 at 19:46, Kenneth Kasajian  wrote: 

> It's funny how many messages there are here about the signature of my e-mail
> (which I cannot control)

You could set up a gmail address for these messages, f'rinstance.

[snip two copies of your unnecessarily extended sig]

--
Cheers  --  Tim

Re: [sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Darren Duncan]

On 2016-05-24 12:23 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:

On 24 May 2016, at 7:46pm, Kasajian, Kenneth 
 wrote:


It's funny how many messages there are here about the signature of my e-mail 
(which I cannot control)


Then please stop posting to public fora from that account.


Yes, exactly.  Unless they're communicating formally on behalf of an 
organization, there is no need to carry on public discourse using an email 
account provided by an organization; a separate personal account works just 
fine, and should also outlast being a member of the organization. -- Darren Duncan


___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Tim Streater]

On 24 May 2016 at 19:46, Kenneth Kasajian 
 wrote: 

> It's funny how many messages there are here about the signature of my e-mail
> (which I cannot control)

You could set up a gmail address for these messages, f'rinstance.

[snip two copies of your unnecessarily extended sig]

--
Cheers  --  Tim
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Simon Slavin]

On 24 May 2016, at 7:46pm, Kasajian, Kenneth 
 wrote:

> It's funny how many messages there are here about the signature of my e-mail 
> (which I cannot control)

Then please stop posting to public fora from that account.

Simon.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Kasajian, Kenneth]

It's funny how many messages there are here about the signature of my e-mail 
(which I cannot control)

I find the discussion about the law interesting.If anyone else wants to 
chime in, please do so.   The more the merrier.

Thanks in advance.

-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org 
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Cecil 
Westerhof
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 2:08 AM
To: SQLite mailing list
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

2016-05-21 3:19 GMT+02:00 Kasajian, Kenneth <
kenneth.kasaj...@schneider-electric.com>:

> *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or
> attached files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also
> be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on
> notice of its status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply
> e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not
> copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other 
> person.
>

​I would make sure that the above does not get send to mailing-lists. It is 
quite annoying and does not serve any purpose.

--
Cecil Westerhof
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

__
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
__

*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached 
files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. 
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

[sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Tom Holden]

RMtrix  writes:

> 
> Mail-Archive.com returns no hits for 2013 and 2014 even when the 
search term is "SQLite". None until
> sometime in 2015. So the archive is incomplete or its index is 
corrupted.
> 
> On the other site, your search has results only in 2013 and 2016. With 
Mail-Archive.com having no data for
> 2013, it returns results only from 2016.
> 
> Tom
> 
> > On May 20, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Kasajian, Kenneth
>  wrote:
> > 
> > When I attempt to search the archives of this mailing list for the 
word: LSM_CONFIG_AUTOFLUSH
> > Using http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-
users%40mailinglists.sqlite.org/
> > I get no hits.
> 

Mail-Archive.com has two archives for the sqlite-users mailing list 
because its address changed on Feb 13, 2015 from sqlite-
users.sqlite.org:8080 to sqlite-users.mailinglists.sqlite.org

The two archives are, respectively,
https://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users at sqlite.org/
https://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org/

I asked if they could be combined and the answer was "Give us a few days 
and we'll let you know when they're combined."

Tom

[sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Tom Holden]

> Mail-Archive.com returns no hits for 2013 and 2014 even when the search term 
> is "SQLite". None until sometime in 2015. So the archive is incomplete or its 
> index is corrupted.
> 
> On the other site, your search has results only in 2013 and 2016. With 
> Mail-Archive.com having no data for 2013, it returns results only from 2016.
> 
> Tom
> 
>> On May 20, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Kasajian, Kenneth > schneider-electric.com> wrote:
>> 
>> When I attempt to search the archives of this mailing list for the word: 
>> LSM_CONFIG_AUTOFLUSH
>> Using http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users%40mailinglists.sqlite.org/
>> I get no hits.

[sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[RMtrix]

Mail-Archive.com returns no hits for 2013 and 2014 even when the search term is 
"SQLite". None until sometime in 2015. So the archive is incomplete or its 
index is corrupted.

On the other site, your search has results only in 2013 and 2016. With 
Mail-Archive.com having no data for 2013, it returns results only from 2016.

Tom

> On May 20, 2016, at 9:19 PM, Kasajian, Kenneth  schneider-electric.com> wrote:
> 
> When I attempt to search the archives of this mailing list for the word: 
> LSM_CONFIG_AUTOFLUSH
> Using http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users%40mailinglists.sqlite.org/
> I get no hits.

[sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Simon Slavin]

On 21 May 2016, at 10:07am, Cecil Westerhof  wrote:

> 2016-05-21 3:19 GMT+02:00 Kasajian, Kenneth <
> Kenneth.Kasajian at schneider-electric.com>:
> 
>> *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or
>> attached files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it
>> is addressed. This e-mail is confidential [snip]
> 
> ?I would make sure that the above does not get send to mailing-lists. It is
> quite annoying and does not serve any purpose.

In the EU they have no effect.  It was judged that it was an attempt to form a 
contract with the receiver of the email without any agreement from them.  It 
can apply only if you've had a previous conversation where they agreed to keep 
the message secret.

But it does do something under US law.  It invalidates the text even on 
messages you /do/ want to be confidential.  Because it states "this email is 
confidential" on a message which clearly isn't.  The example used in court 
featured staff of the Public Relations department who used the same disclaimer 
as the rest of the company, and routinely sent out Press Releases and messages 
to the general public with no confidential information in.  The judgement was 
that this showed that the company wasn't using that message only for 
confidential information, and that that contradicted the text in the message.

So under US law the message may have some effect, but only if you use it only 
on messages that /do/ contain confidential information.  If you use it for 
every message it means you don't mean it.

I Am Not A Lawyer.  If you want legal advice, consult a lawyer.

Simon.

[sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Cecil Westerhof]

2016-05-21 3:19 GMT+02:00 Kasajian, Kenneth <
Kenneth.Kasajian at schneider-electric.com>:

> *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or
> attached files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it
> is addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally
> privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its
> status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then
> delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for
> any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.
>

?I would make sure that the above does not get send to mailing-lists. It is
quite annoying and does not serve any purpose.

-- 
Cecil Westerhof

[sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Tim Streater]

On 21 May 2016 at 10:07, Cecil Westerhof  wrote: 

> 2016-05-21 3:19 GMT+02:00 Kasajian, Kenneth <
> Kenneth.Kasajian at schneider-electric.com>:
>
>> *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or ...

> ?I would make sure that the above does not get send to mailing-lists. It is
> quite annoying and does not serve any purpose.

Quite right. I would edit the received mail to get rid of the nonsense, but 
there are too many mails to do that. I would appreciate it if they didn't 
appear at all.

--
Cheers  --  Tim

[sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Keith Medcalf]

> 2016-05-21 3:19 GMT+02:00 Kasajian, Kenneth  schneider-electric.com>:
> 
> > *** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or
> > attached files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which
> > it is addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally
> > privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its
> > status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then
> > delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it
> > for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person.

Thank-you for purchasing electron destruction services from us.  Based on 
weight,
your e-mail message contains over 400 million trillion electrons.  This 
qualifies
you for the bulk electron destruction rate of only $1.00 per trillion 
electrons.

Unfortunately you do not have any credit history with us.  Please submit your
payment for $1.00 million dollars and we will be happy to carry out your 
request.

In the interim, your electrons have been placed in a magnetic bottle for 
storage.

The estimated cost of storage is $25.00 per hundred trillion electrons per day.

In the event that you fail to pay the amounts invoiced for the services that 
you 
have ordered, legal action will be taken against you.

[sqlite] Searching this mailing lsit

[Kasajian, Kenneth]

When I attempt to search the archives of this mailing list for the word: 
LSM_CONFIG_AUTOFLUSH
Using http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users%40mailinglists.sqlite.org/
I get no hits.

But when I search using http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/
It does work:
See? --> 
http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=search_page=2=LSM_CONFIG_AUTOFLUSH

Anyone know why?


*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or attached 
files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is 
addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. 
If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please 
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from 
your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its 
contents to any other person.