Re: Tiles-el and nested-el tags (was Re: Support for non-JSTL tags)
David == David M Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sgarlata == Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sgarlata Speaking of EL, I noticed we don't have EL versions of the Tiles tags. I would Sgarlata be happy to provide the implementations, but I know it will be tedious so I Sgarlata only want to proceed if there's a reasonably good chance they will be added to Sgarlata the Struts distribution. Thoughts anyone? Sgarlata In a private conversation Steve Raeburn indicated he would be interested in Sgarlata these tags. Steve also pointed out we are missing the Nested tags, but since Sgarlata I've never used those before I leave that tedious task to someone else ;) David I've been intending to produce at least a tiles-el library, and possibly a David nested-el library, but I've been trying to watch for a significant level of David interest for this. I very occasionally see a mention of a desire for David tiles-el, and less so for nested-el. I haven't looked at those libraries David for a while, so I'm not certain how much value there will be for this. If David there's really significant interest in this, I could proceed with this, first David doing tiles-el, and then nested-el. I'm planning on committing the tiles-el library this weekend, but I won't have any unit or integration tests for it by the time I commit it. I'll proceed down that path once it's committed, but that process will be slow. I'd appreciate it if motivated Tiles/JSTL users could test it as much as possible once I've put it into the nightly build. I'll also start looking at the nested-el library, just for completeness. -- === David M. Karr ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; SCJP; SCWCD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tiles-el and nested-el tags (was Re: Support for non-JSTL tags)
I'm planning on committing the tiles-el library this weekend, but I won't have any unit or integration tests for it by the time I commit it. I'll proceed down that path once it's committed, but that process will be slow. I'd appreciate it if motivated Tiles/JSTL users could test it as much as possible once I've put it into the nightly build. I'll do my best to do some testing with tiles-el. I don't use every tag and attribute in the library in my application, but I will test as much as I can. If you want any help on the development of the library let me know. I'll also start looking at the nested-el library, just for completeness. That seems like a good idea to me, although I don't use nested-el so I won't be able to help test. Matt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tiles-el and nested-el tags (was Re: Support for non-JSTL tags)
Thanks for the update. I'll see if I can work them a little for you. Edgar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tiles-el and nested-el tags (was Re: Support for non-JSTL tags)
Speaking of EL, I noticed we don't have EL versions of the Tiles tags. I
would be happy to provide the implementations, but I know it will be
tedious so I only want to proceed if there's a reasonably good chance
they will be added to the Struts distribution. Thoughts anyone?
In a private conversation Steve Raeburn indicated he would be interested
in these tags. Steve also pointed out we are missing the Nested tags,
but since I've never used those before I leave that tedious task to
someone else ;)
Matt
Steve Raeburn wrote:
You are right, JSTL doesn't completely remove the need for Struts specific
tags.
I think for the purposes of this discussion, the next generation would be
JSTL plus the struts-el taglib and when we talk about the Struts tags, we're
really talking about the traditional, non-el tags.
So keep using the html:form and other Struts tag and consider migrating to
the EL versions if you are using JSTL.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 1, 2003 1:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Support for non-JSTL tags (was RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21465]
- Enhancement of the html:link tag)
Perhaps this belongs on the user list, but I think it is relevant for
the discussion at hand. You all seem to regard all of the Struts taglibs
as one item, for which JSTL is an alternative. While this is certainly
true for the logic: and bean: tags, I have not seen a replacement for
the
html: form tags (that is, html:form and all the controls) in JSTL.
The user guide
(http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/building_view.html#form_bean
s)
suggests we replace
input type=text name=username
value=%= loginBean.getUsername() /
with
html:text property=username/
Does the use JSTL camp prefer this,
input type=text name=username
value=c:out value=${loginBean.username}/
or am I missing some basic JSTL?
Shai.
PS: There is a documentation error there; the original JSP should be
input type=text name=username
value=%= loginBean.getUsername() %/
--^
Shai.
---
Confidentiality Notice: This email transmission may contain
confidential or legally privileged information that is intended
only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the
contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail transmission in error, please reply to the
sender, so that arrangements can be made for proper delivery, and
then please delete the message from your inbox.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tiles-el and nested-el tags (was Re: Support for non-JSTL tags)
Sgarlata == Sgarlata Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sgarlata Speaking of EL, I noticed we don't have EL versions of the Tiles tags. I would Sgarlata be happy to provide the implementations, but I know it will be tedious so I Sgarlata only want to proceed if there's a reasonably good chance they will be added to Sgarlata the Struts distribution. Thoughts anyone? Sgarlata In a private conversation Steve Raeburn indicated he would be interested in Sgarlata these tags. Steve also pointed out we are missing the Nested tags, but since Sgarlata I've never used those before I leave that tedious task to someone else ;) I've been intending to produce at least a tiles-el library, and possibly a nested-el library, but I've been trying to watch for a significant level of interest for this. I very occasionally see a mention of a desire for tiles-el, and less so for nested-el. I haven't looked at those libraries for a while, so I'm not certain how much value there will be for this. If there's really significant interest in this, I could proceed with this, first doing tiles-el, and then nested-el. -- === David M. Karr ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; SCJP; SCWCD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
