[Sugar-devel] dbus exception

2015-09-02 Thread Tony Anderson 
Another problem. The Quiz activity crashes in various ways. On some 
occasions, it completes normally.
The log shows no error messages. However, it reports in some cases 
terminated with  signal 6 or signal 11.


Using try, I was able to narrow it down to a datastore.get. The 
exception is 'dbus.exceptions.DBusException'>,

DBusException('Did not receive a reply, ...).

I assume the lack of error messages relates to the same
problem, the error occurs in a different process.

I have also seen an isolated (preceded and followed by unrelated 
messages from the activity) message in the log:


Fatal Python error: (pygame parachute) Segmentation fault

In this case, the log reported a signal 6.

Tony
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

2015-09-02 Thread James Cameron 
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 06:49:50PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Would installing 106 on F22-21 be worth anything?

I guess so.  If the problem occurs, blame 0.106.  If it does not,
blame Fedora 23.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

2015-09-02 Thread Jerry Vonau 


> On September 2, 2015 at 3:49 PM James Cameron  wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:59:06AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > On September 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM James Cameron 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > > That leads me to think if sugar is building against a library that
> > > > is only available in sugar's toolkit should the toolkit be declared
> > > > as a BuildRequires and be pulled into the BuildRoot for sugar?
> > > 
> > > Possibly because nothing in the build of package "sugar" uses the
> > > library.
> > > 
> > > I've looked through the Makefile.am files in "sugar" and none of them
> > > do linking, and the ones that execute Python code don't need that
> > > library.
> > > 
> > 
> > Ok got it, ldconfig keeps it all straight, so it's contained to the
> > call in the toolkit, bringing the login manager back in a loop, so I
> > see when booting the F23 iso in a vm.
> 
> Couldn't parse that, sorry.
>

It's ok I was tired, kind of rambling.
 
> > The only change I see from F22 with 104 to F23 with 106 around
> > SugarExt is the commit to "Add capture device support" in the
> > toolkit.
> 
> That's strange, in my git repo that commit is just before the 0.101.4
> release back in 2014-03-22.
> 
Think I miss typed what I wanted, s/b 101.4 

> It was the most recent change to SugarExt, but it should have been in
> F22 with 0.104 already.
>
 
Agreed, F23 is where the crash occurs. Using rpm -qa as a starting point
with sugar-build on F20, to diff[1] what sugar-build has installed in the
chroot and what is installed in a copr build's BR[2] with /usr/bin/dnf',
'builddep'.
The short list of devel packages is here[3]. Thinking maybe one of the
devel packages that are used to build against has now sprung a new
sub-package where the support now lives but is missing from the buildroot.

> I've not got the bandwidth for downloading SoaS, but the tests I
> suggest are:
> 
> a.  use RPM to reinstall the Sugar 0.106 packages,
> 
> b.  use RPM to reinstall the F22 Sugar 0.104 binary packages,
> 
> c.  use RPM to rebuild the F22 Sugar 0.104 packages from src.rpm.
> 
> That would help to divide the problem between Sugar and Fedora 23.

Would installing 106 on F22-21 be worth anything? I've setup a copr[4] for
that. I'll set up the 104 in F23 in a bit.

1. http://pastebin.com/L5c5fHup
2.
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/jvonau3/jvonau_playpen/fedora-23-x86_64/00112609-sugar-toolkit-gtk3/root.log.gz
3. http://pastebin.com/WvB3HJCm 
4. https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jvonau3/Sugar_106_F21_F22/

Jerry
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

2015-09-02 Thread Jerry Vonau 


> On September 2, 2015 at 7:21 PM James Cameron  wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 06:49:50PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > Would installing 106 on F22-21 be worth anything?
> 
> I guess so.  If the problem occurs, blame 0.106.  If it does not,
> blame Fedora 23.

sudo dnf copr enable jvonau3/Sugar_106_F21_F22
sudo dnf update sugar* 

F22 upgrades clean to 106, feels pretty zippy in a VM. Back to figuring out
what is now different in the dependencies given the logs[1] for the builds
look more or less the same F21 <-> F23. There has to be a rpm package with
a library that was split somewhere, sugar's toolkit wants to use something
but is left unsatisfied.

1. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/sugar-toolkit-gtk3  
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

2015-09-02 Thread James Cameron 
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 12:11:38AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> F22 upgrades clean to 106, feels pretty zippy in a VM. Back to
> figuring out what is now different in the dependencies given the
> logs[1] for the builds look more or less the same F21 <-> F23. There
> has to be a rpm package with a library that was split somewhere,
> sugar's toolkit wants to use something but is left unsatisfied.

It might be interesting to see if the F23 build of 0.104.1 also has
the problem on F23.  As further proof that it isn't anything Sugar did.

Comparing the logs of 0.104.1 build for x86_64 between F22 and F23,
the only interesting change that springs up is;

-LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro '
+LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld'

Doesn't seem related to the reported problem, however.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

2015-09-02 Thread James Cameron 
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:59:06AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> 
> 
> > On September 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM James Cameron  wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > That leads me to think if sugar is building against a library that
> > > is only available in sugar's toolkit should the toolkit be declared
> > > as a BuildRequires and be pulled into the BuildRoot for sugar?
> > 
> > Possibly because nothing in the build of package "sugar" uses the
> > library.
> > 
> > I've looked through the Makefile.am files in "sugar" and none of them
> > do linking, and the ones that execute Python code don't need that
> > library.
> > 
> 
> Ok got it, ldconfig keeps it all straight, so it's contained to the
> call in the toolkit, bringing the login manager back in a loop, so I
> see when booting the F23 iso in a vm.

Couldn't parse that, sorry.

> The only change I see from F22 with 104 to F23 with 106 around
> SugarExt is the commit to "Add capture device support" in the
> toolkit.

That's strange, in my git repo that commit is just before the 0.101.4
release back in 2014-03-22.

It was the most recent change to SugarExt, but it should have been in
F22 with 0.104 already.

I've not got the bandwidth for downloading SoaS, but the tests I
suggest are:

a.  use RPM to reinstall the Sugar 0.106 packages,

b.  use RPM to reinstall the F22 Sugar 0.104 binary packages,

c.  use RPM to rebuild the F22 Sugar 0.104 packages from src.rpm.

That would help to divide the problem between Sugar and Fedora 23.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Spell checker, Grammar checker for Write

2015-09-02 Thread Lionel Laské 
Seems that lot of other rpm package are need :-(

erreur : Dépendances requises:
liblink-grammar.so.4 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(cairo-fc) est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(cairo-pdf) est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(cairo-ps) est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(enchant) >= 1.2.0 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(fribidi) >= 0.10.4 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(gio-2.0) est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(glib-2.0) >= 2.6.0 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) >= 2.6.0 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(gthread-2.0) >= 2.6.0 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0) >= 3.0.8 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(gtk+-unix-print-3.0) est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(libgsf-1) >= 1.14.18 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(librsvg-2.0) >= 2.16.0 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(pangocairo) est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(wv-1.0) >= 1.2.0 est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
pkgconfig(x11) est nécessaire pour
libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl

Is it not package integrated in 0.106 ?

   Lionel.


2015-08-31 22:33 GMT+02:00 Gonzalo Odiard :

> You can try
> http://dev.laptop.org/~gonzalo/abiword-with-spell-checking-enabled.zip
> (for arm) for xo-1, xo-1.5, you need recompile the abiword rpm.
> We have a spec and patches, but mostly are changes needed to support touch
> in the XO-4 [1]
> Maybe you can try using a standard fedora rpm for 32 bits.
>
> [1] https://github.com/godiard/olpc-abiword-rpm
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Lionel Laské 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks Sam and Jerry for advice.
>> Thanks Gonzalo for this very detailed answer.
>>
>> I've tested it on a XO-4 with 0.106.
>> I've removed the line you mentioned in keybindings.xml file but without
>> any result neither in Write activity (tested in v96 and v82) neither in
>> abiword.
>> Guess it means that --disable-spell was used at compilation time.
>> Is there a place where I could download another binary/rpm with the spell
>> enable ?
>>
>>Lionel.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2015-08-31 14:28 GMT+02:00 Gonzalo Odiard :
>>
>>> Hi Lionel,
>>>
>>> The spell checker on Write was disable due to bug
>>> http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4124
>>>
>>> To enable, you need edit the file
>>> /home/olpc/Activities/Write.activity/keybindings.xml
>>> and remove the line:
>>> 
>>>
>>> If that do not work you need check:
>>> * if the abiword rpm in your image was compiled with the option
>>> --disable-spell or not
>>> (a good test could be run abiword in the terminal and check if you can
>>> enable spell check)
>>> * you need check if a dictionary for French is needed.
>>> Abiword can use aspell or ispell dictionaries
>>> http://www.abisource.com/help/en-US/info/infospelling.html
>>>
>>> Tell us the result of your test in your environment,
>>> maybe is time of enable the feature again.
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Lionel Laské 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi all,

 An OLPC France teacher working on our small XO-4 deployment asked me if
 it's possible to enhance Write activity with a spell checker, grammar
 checker or a dictionary (all in French).

 I reminded me that Write activity is based on AbiWord and it seems that
 AbiWord allow some sort of plug-ins.

 Do you know if it's possible to enhance Write with AbiWord plugins ?
 Is there someone that experience this sort of thing ?

 Tell me.

 Best regards from France.

Lionel.

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gonzalo Odiard
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gonzalo Odiard
>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Spell checker, Grammar checker for Write

2015-09-02 Thread Gonzalo Odiard 
no

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Lionel Laské  wrote:

>
> Seems that lot of other rpm package are need :-(
>
> erreur : Dépendances requises:
> liblink-grammar.so.4 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(cairo-fc) est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(cairo-pdf) est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(cairo-ps) est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(enchant) >= 1.2.0 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(fribidi) >= 0.10.4 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(gio-2.0) est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(glib-2.0) >= 2.6.0 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) >= 2.6.0 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(gthread-2.0) >= 2.6.0 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0) >= 3.0.8 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(gtk+-unix-print-3.0) est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(libgsf-1) >= 1.14.18 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(librsvg-2.0) >= 2.16.0 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(pangocairo) est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(wv-1.0) >= 1.2.0 est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
> pkgconfig(x11) est nécessaire pour
> libabiword-devel-1:2.9.3-1.git20121011.fc18.olpc13.armv7hl
>
> Is it not package integrated in 0.106 ?
>
>Lionel.
>
>
> 2015-08-31 22:33 GMT+02:00 Gonzalo Odiard :
>
>> You can try
>> http://dev.laptop.org/~gonzalo/abiword-with-spell-checking-enabled.zip
>> (for arm) for xo-1, xo-1.5, you need recompile the abiword rpm.
>> We have a spec and patches, but mostly are changes needed to support
>> touch in the XO-4 [1]
>> Maybe you can try using a standard fedora rpm for 32 bits.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/godiard/olpc-abiword-rpm
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Lionel Laské 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Thanks Sam and Jerry for advice.
>>> Thanks Gonzalo for this very detailed answer.
>>>
>>> I've tested it on a XO-4 with 0.106.
>>> I've removed the line you mentioned in keybindings.xml file but without
>>> any result neither in Write activity (tested in v96 and v82) neither in
>>> abiword.
>>> Guess it means that --disable-spell was used at compilation time.
>>> Is there a place where I could download another binary/rpm with the
>>> spell enable ?
>>>
>>>Lionel.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-08-31 14:28 GMT+02:00 Gonzalo Odiard :
>>>
 Hi Lionel,

 The spell checker on Write was disable due to bug
 http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4124

 To enable, you need edit the file
 /home/olpc/Activities/Write.activity/keybindings.xml
 and remove the line:
 

 If that do not work you need check:
 * if the abiword rpm in your image was compiled with the option
 --disable-spell or not
 (a good test could be run abiword in the terminal and check if you can
 enable spell check)
 * you need check if a dictionary for French is needed.
 Abiword can use aspell or ispell dictionaries
 http://www.abisource.com/help/en-US/info/infospelling.html

 Tell us the result of your test in your environment,
 maybe is time of enable the feature again.

 Gonzalo


 On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Lionel Laské 
 wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> An OLPC France teacher working on our small XO-4 deployment asked me
> if it's possible to enhance Write activity with a spell checker, grammar
> checker or a dictionary (all in French).
>
> I reminded me that Write activity is based on AbiWord and it seems
> that AbiWord allow some sort of plug-ins.
>
> Do you know if it's possible to enhance Write with AbiWord plugins ?
> Is there someone that experience this sort of thing ?
>
> Tell me.
>
> Best regards from France.
>
>Lionel.
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


 --
 Gonzalo Odiard


>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gonzalo Odiard
>>
>>
>


-- 
Gonzalo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

2015-09-02 Thread Martin Abente 
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:49 PM, James Cameron  wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 05:59:06AM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On September 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM James Cameron 
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > > > That leads me to think if sugar is building against a library that
> > > > is only available in sugar's toolkit should the toolkit be declared
> > > > as a BuildRequires and be pulled into the BuildRoot for sugar?
> > >
> > > Possibly because nothing in the build of package "sugar" uses the
> > > library.
> > >
> > > I've looked through the Makefile.am files in "sugar" and none of them
> > > do linking, and the ones that execute Python code don't need that
> > > library.
> > >
> >
> > Ok got it, ldconfig keeps it all straight, so it's contained to the
> > call in the toolkit, bringing the login manager back in a loop, so I
> > see when booting the F23 iso in a vm.
>
> Couldn't parse that, sorry.


> > The only change I see from F22 with 104 to F23 with 106 around
> > SugarExt is the commit to "Add capture device support" in the
> > toolkit.
>
> That's strange, in my git repo that commit is just before the 0.101.4
> release back in 2014-03-22.



>
> It was the most recent change to SugarExt, but it should have been in
> F22 with 0.104 already.
>
>
Yes, all changes that impact on SugarExt were already present in 0.104,
being this [1] the last one.

Refs:
[1]
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/commit/7739336fb62afc05040559187ef2d47c89c32506


> I've not got the bandwidth for downloading SoaS, but the tests I
> suggest are:
>
> a.  use RPM to reinstall the Sugar 0.106 packages,


> b.  use RPM to reinstall the F22 Sugar 0.104 binary packages,


> c.  use RPM to rebuild the F22 Sugar 0.104 packages from src.rpm.


> That would help to divide the problem between Sugar and Fedora 23.,



> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] dbus exception

2015-09-02 Thread Tony Anderson 

Hi, Gonzalo

Sadly, the log shows nothing. I get the exception on a
try:
datastore.get(obj) (where obj = olpcgames.ACTIVITY.game_handle)

where the activity uses the standard olpcgames activity.py,

the activity.py in olpcgames has:

def __init__(self, handle):

if handle.object_Id:
self.game_handle = handle.object_id

along with some magic code (def make_global)  to make olpcgames.ACTIVITY 
refer to 'self'.


The activity is derived from the one in ASLO, but I added the ability to 
start a quiz by resume from the Journal so this datastore usage is not 
in that

version. However, this code worked in 13.2.2.

Tony

On 09/02/2015 12:26 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:

Hi Tony,
Could you attach log files and link to the activity version you are using?
The information provided is not enough to guess what is happening
"DBusException('Did not receive a reply, ...)." means the datastore is 
not replying,

(or is taking a too log time) but why that is happening is not clear.

Gonzalo

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Tony Anderson > wrote:


Another problem. The Quiz activity crashes in various ways. On
some occasions, it completes normally.
The log shows no error messages. However, it reports in some cases
terminated with  signal 6 or signal 11.

Using try, I was able to narrow it down to a datastore.get. The
exception is 'dbus.exceptions.DBusException'>,
DBusException('Did not receive a reply, ...).

I assume the lack of error messages relates to the same
problem, the error occurs in a different process.

I have also seen an isolated (preceded and followed by unrelated
messages from the activity) message in the log:

Fatal Python error: (pygame parachute) Segmentation fault

In this case, the log reported a signal 6.

Tony
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




--
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Software [for | by] children learning


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login from live system user

2015-09-02 Thread Jerry Vonau 


> On September 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM James Cameron  wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > That leads me to think if sugar is building against a library that
> > is only available in sugar's toolkit should the toolkit be declared
> > as a BuildRequires and be pulled into the BuildRoot for sugar?
> 
> Possibly because nothing in the build of package "sugar" uses the
> library.
> 
> I've looked through the Makefile.am files in "sugar" and none of them
> do linking, and the ones that execute Python code don't need that
> library.
> 

Ok got it, ldconfig keeps it all straight, so it's contained to the call in
the toolkit, bringing the login manager back in a loop, so I see when
booting the F23 iso in a vm. 

The only change I see from F22 with 104 to F23 with 106 around SugarExt is
the commit to "Add capture device support" in the toolkit.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] dbus exception

2015-09-02 Thread Gonzalo Odiard 
Hi Tony,
Could you attach log files and link to the activity version you are using?
The information provided is not enough to guess what is happening
"DBusException('Did not receive a reply, ...)." means the datastore is not
replying,
(or is taking a too log time) but why that is happening is not clear.

Gonzalo

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Tony Anderson  wrote:

> Another problem. The Quiz activity crashes in various ways. On some
> occasions, it completes normally.
> The log shows no error messages. However, it reports in some cases
> terminated with  signal 6 or signal 11.
>
> Using try, I was able to narrow it down to a datastore.get. The exception
> is 'dbus.exceptions.DBusException'>,
> DBusException('Did not receive a reply, ...).
>
> I assume the lack of error messages relates to the same
> problem, the error occurs in a different process.
>
> I have also seen an isolated (preceded and followed by unrelated messages
> from the activity) message in the log:
>
> Fatal Python error: (pygame parachute) Segmentation fault
>
> In this case, the log reported a signal 6.
>
> Tony
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>



-- 
Gonzalo Odiard

SugarLabs - Software [for | by] children learning
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 83, Issue 5

2015-09-02 Thread Sneha Mohanty 
Hi Ishan,

Would love to collaborate with you. Please let me know what and how you are
proceeding. Also, at present i am thinking of using Python for the ANN part
, and three.js for the image processing part. But like i said, i am at the
initial stage of it and would like to know your views on it.

Regards,
Sneha

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:16 PM, 
wrote:

> Send Sugar-devel mailing list submissions to
> sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sugar-devel-requ...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sugar-devel-ow...@lists.sugarlabs.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Sugar-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re : Image Processing using three.js and ANNs (Ishan Sharma)
>2. Re: [Announcing] sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 v0.106.1 (bug
>   fixes release) (Jerry Vonau)
>3. dbus exception (Tony Anderson)
>4. Re: dbus exception (Gonzalo Odiard)
>5. Re: Bug 1240354 - SoaS live x86_64 20150706 does not login
>   from live system user (Jerry Vonau)
>6. Re: dbus exception (Tony Anderson)
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 09:47:11 +0530
> From: Ishan Sharma 
> To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: [Sugar-devel] Re : Image Processing using three.js and ANNs
> Message-ID:
>