On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 21:05, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote:
Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Mon Oct 04 19:48:36 +0200 2010:
Can submitters reply to their own messages for those that are intended
to go in before we branch?
This patch of mine is a bug fix and should go into 0.90.1:
[sugar] fix recognition of JEBs outside of data store [1]
These patches fix breakages on a HAL-free system (does F14 still ship
HAL?):
[sugar] battery frame device: replace HAL with UPower [2]
[Read] don't break if HAL is not available [3]
We don't have tickets for any of these? I think at this point we
should be still focusing on fixing regressions. If they are
enhancements or fixes for things that had already been broken, then I
think they could land in 0.90 just after we make the first bugfix
release.
If you'd like I can bump the threads, but maybe you like Patchwork
even better. ;)
Actually, the value I saw in Patchwork was submitters (and others)
helping me manage my queue by assigning me patches to review, but that
doesn't seem going to happen :(
Regards,
Tomeu
All other patches I posted are for 0.92.
Sascha
[1] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/169/
[2] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/134/
[3] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/27/
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
