Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:32 +1000, James Cameron wrote: However, I've just applied the patch on os119 on XO-1.5, restarted Sugar and tested Restart and Shutdown options, and they function correctly. Restart causes a UL screen and reboot. Shutdown causes a UL screen and power off. As we're there, how do we get rid of the useless UL screen with its ugly inverted color scheme? Moreover, the UL screen fights with powerd's pretty shutdown screens. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
bernie wrote: On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:32 +1000, James Cameron wrote: However, I've just applied the patch on os119 on XO-1.5, restarted Sugar and tested Restart and Shutdown options, and they function correctly. Restart causes a UL screen and reboot. Shutdown causes a UL screen and power off. As we're there, how do we get rid of the useless UL screen with its ugly inverted color scheme? i believe the UL screen is mandated, but i don't know the details. i.e., we may not have a choice. paul =- paul fox, p...@laptop.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:46:41AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: As we're there, how do we get rid of the useless UL screen with its ugly inverted color scheme? For OLPC builds we'd need a product safety review to remove it. ;-) For deployment builds, you could hide /usr/sbin/ul-warning ... I've tested this and the result is that X goes away, the text console displays a few messages from init, and then the power goes off. Is that the behaviour you need? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 01:18:53PM +1000, James Cameron wrote: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Manager.NotPrivileged: Not privileged for action: org.freedesktop.consolekit.system.restart-multiple-users auth_admin_keep_always After the patch is applied, Sugar's shutdown and restart options fail if there are multiple logged in users; via SSH or text console. Just digged around a bit; while both ConsoleKit and HAL go through PolicyKit for authentication, the names of the configuration variables differ. Since I've run into the same issue before (i.e. with HAL), I suppose the default is the same but the OLPC builds explicitly configure HAL to allow shutdowns even for multiple sessions? CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: Hi James/Sascha, Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards- compatibility break this is. While the actual patch was only tested on XO-1, I tried out the ConsoleKit API on XO-1.5 first. Both times Debian squeeze but since you only mentioned the name of the hardware I suppose this is exactly what you wanted to know. ;) CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:32 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: Hi James/Sascha, Reviewed-by: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards- compatibility break this is. No, I only did a code review and cross-check against ConsoleKit API documentation. However, I've just applied the patch on os119 on XO-1.5, restarted Sugar and tested Restart and Shutdown options, and they function correctly. Restart causes a UL screen and reboot. Shutdown causes a UL screen and power off. Tested-by: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Now, if one also stops HAL, the shutdown or restart options don't work, and shell.log says: I thought the point of these patches was to move from HAL to ConsoleKit so surely it should work whether HAL is there or not especially with everyone moving away from HAL to ConsoleKit/upower/udisk/udev etc/ Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:12:43AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:32 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: Now, if one also stops HAL, the shutdown or restart options don't work, and shell.log says: I thought the point of these patches was to move from HAL to ConsoleKit so surely it should work whether HAL is there or not especially with everyone moving away from HAL to ConsoleKit/upower/udisk/udev etc/ I do not know those mechanisms intimately, but can easily imagine that on some (versions of some) systems the transition has not completed yet so that *other* parts of the chain fail if HAL is unavailable. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:12:43AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: I thought the point of these patches was to move from HAL to ConsoleKit so surely it should work whether HAL is there or not especially with everyone moving away from HAL to ConsoleKit/upower/udisk/udev etc/ The failure was unrelated to HAL being missing. It was ConsoleKit permissions. I did try without HAL started, but keyboard and touchpad failed to work, so I couldn't shutdown using the Sugar menu. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:17:14AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: Since I've run into the same issue before (i.e. with HAL), I suppose the default is the same but the OLPC builds explicitly configure HAL to allow shutdowns even for multiple sessions? I've looked and not found where this might occur. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On 21 April 2010 19:07, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:17:14AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: Since I've run into the same issue before (i.e. with HAL), I suppose the default is the same but the OLPC builds explicitly configure HAL to allow shutdowns even for multiple sessions? I've looked and not found where this might occur. See PolicyKit-olpc Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
Hi James/Sascha, Reviewed-by: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards- compatibility break this is. - Chris. -- Chris Ball c...@laptop.org One Laptop Per Child ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: Hi James/Sascha, Reviewed-by: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards- compatibility break this is. No, I only did a code review and cross-check against ConsoleKit API documentation. However, I've just applied the patch on os119 on XO-1.5, restarted Sugar and tested Restart and Shutdown options, and they function correctly. Restart causes a UL screen and reboot. Shutdown causes a UL screen and power off. Tested-by: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Now, if one also stops HAL, the shutdown or restart options don't work, and shell.log says: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sugar/session.py, line 50, in __shutdown_completed_cb self.shutdown_completed() File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/jarabe/model/session.py, line 64, in shutdown_completed pm.Restart() File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py, line 68, in __call__ return self._proxy_method(*args, **keywords) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py, line 140, in __call__ **keywords) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/connection.py, line 630, in call_blocking message, timeout) dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Manager.NotPrivileged: Not privileged for action: org.freedesktop.consolekit.system.restart-multiple-users auth_admin_keep_always -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
james wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:55:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: Hi James/Sascha, Reviewed-by: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Did you test on XO-1 or XO-1.5? I'm curious how much of a backwards- compatibility break this is. No, I only did a code review and cross-check against ConsoleKit API documentation. However, I've just applied the patch on os119 on XO-1.5, restarted Sugar and tested Restart and Shutdown options, and they function correctly. Restart causes a UL screen and reboot. Shutdown causes a UL screen and power off. so, can someone tell me (gently) why either of these techniques is better than simply invoking /bin/reboot or /bin/shutdown? (other than the fact that those will work even if hal isn't running?) paul Tested-by: James Cameron qu...@laptop.org Now, if one also stops HAL, the shutdown or restart options don't work, and shell.log says: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sugar/session.py, line 50, in __shutdown_completed_cb self.shutdown_completed() File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/jarabe/model/session.py, line 64, in shutdown_completed pm.Restart() File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py, line 68, in __call__ return self._proxy_method(*args, **keywords) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py, line 140, in __call__ **keywords) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/connection.py, line 630, in call_blocking message, timeout) dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Manager.NotPrivileged: Not privileged for action: org.freedesktop.consolekit.system.restart-multiple-users auth_admin_keep_always -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel =- paul fox, p...@laptop.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 08:37:54PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote: so, can someone tell me (gently) why either of these techniques is better than simply invoking /bin/reboot or /bin/shutdown? (other than the fact that those will work even if hal isn't running?) Lets Sugar hop the privilege barrier in a controlled fashion. We could work around that entirely by blessing /bin/reboot or /bin/shutdown with setuid. ;-} -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
james wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 08:37:54PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote: so, can someone tell me (gently) why either of these techniques is better than simply invoking /bin/reboot or /bin/shutdown? (other than the fact that those will work even if hal isn't running?) Lets Sugar hop the privilege barrier in a controlled fashion. We could work around that entirely by blessing /bin/reboot or /bin/shutdown with setuid. ;-} doh. thank you. that was very gentle. :-) paul permissions? what permissions? =- paul fox, p...@laptop.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] use ConsoleKit instead of HAL for shutdown/reboot
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:32:28AM +1000, James Cameron wrote: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Manager.NotPrivileged: Not privileged for action: org.freedesktop.consolekit.system.restart-multiple-users auth_admin_keep_always After the patch is applied, Sugar's shutdown and restart options fail if there are multiple logged in users; via SSH or text console. It didn't have anything to do with HAL being stopped, my mistake earlier. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
