Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-24 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:01:07PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
 Aleksey wrote:
 
  To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
  I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
  in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned
  repos[2] and follow simple test case[3].
  
  [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend
  [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend#Scope
  [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend#How_To_Test
 
 Aleksey,
 
 I tried out your patches in a Debian Sid chroot with
 
zeroinstall-injector-0.42.1-1
 
 installed and got the following exception in shell.log when running your test
 case:
 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/jarabe/desktop/favoritesview.py, 
 line 519, in __button_release_event_cb
self._activate()
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/jarabe/desktop/favoritesview.py, 
 line 531, in _activate
self._resume(self._journal_entries[0])
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/jarabe/desktop/favoritesview.py, 
 line 524, in _resume
shell.resume(journal_entry, self._activity_info.get_bundle_id())
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/jarabe/util/shell.py, line 222, 
 in resume
launch(bundle, handle, get_icon_color(metadata))
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/jarabe/util/shell.py, line 238, 
 in launch
launcher.add_launcher(bundle, activity_handle, color)
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/jarabe/view/launcher.py, line 
 185, in add_launcher
zdepend.fetch(zfeed, progress, create_activity, cancel)
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/jarabe/util/zdepend.py, line 49, 
 in fetch
downloaded = policy.download_uncached_implementations()
  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/zeroinstall/injector/policy.py, 
 line 393, in download_uncached_implementations
assert self.solver.ready, Solver is not ready!\n%s % 
 self.solver.selections
AssertionError: Solver is not ready!
{Interface http://rox.sourceforge.net/2005/interfaces/ROX-Lib: None, 
 Interface /home/sugar/Activities/Terminal.activity/activity/0depend.xml: v1 
 (/home/sugar/Activities/Terminal.activity/activity)}
 
 The problem seems to be that you haven't told the policy object to solve the
 feeds. You can do that with 
 
policy.solve_with_downloads()
 
 and maybe in other ways too.

yeah, in my testing environment I have remains from previous 0install
sessions

 Anyway, after teaching zdepend.py to solve the policy, I ran into into further
 trouble because my zeroinstall trust-db doesn't contain the ROX keys.
 
 To deal with this, I think you need to construct the policy object with a
 Handler object
 

 http://0install.net/python-api/html/zeroinstall.injector.handler.Handler-class.html
 
 and override its confirm_keys method.

I've pushed new commits with fixed these issues and added cancel button

 
 @Thomas, Rene: is this about right?
 
 Michael 
 

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-24 Thread Michael Stone
Aleksey wrote:

 yeah, in my testing environment I have remains from previous 0install
 sessions
 
 I've pushed new commits with fixed these issues and added cancel button

Aleksey,

Your test case passes on my system with these additional commits.

Nice work,

Michael
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:51:27AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
 I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
 in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned
 repos[2] and follow simple test case[3].
 
 [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend
 [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend#Scope
 [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend#How_To_Test

I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4]

The reason for this feature is to cover situations:
* an activity has dependencies that weren't included to the Sugar Platform
* install/build activity specific binaries
* run non-sugar applications that are not well packaged to GNU/Linux 
distributions 

[4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Install_integration

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
 I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4]

Good to see progress on this. Much appreciated. Some questions...

 - Why is the depcheck happening at first start time? Install time
seems be more appropriate: install time means there is a src of
software, needed deps can be grabbed from the same src if present...

 - What happens if the deps are missing? If the user is offline?

 - What happens when the build fails?

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
  I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4]
 
 Good to see progress on this. Much appreciated. Some questions...
 
  - Why is the depcheck happening at first start time? Install time
 seems be more appropriate: install time means there is a src of
 software, needed deps can be grabbed from the same src if present...

in that case we entirely depend on 0install, so sugar provide just new
GUI for 0launch(here just for downloading/building dependencies).

  - What happens if the deps are missing? If the user is offline?

activity fails to start but in case of offline, 0install provides some
options that could be useful for users(0share, 0mirror).

  - What happens when the build fails?

activity just fails, and of course we can add some kind of bugreporting
feature.

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
 Hi Aleksey,
 
 On 23 Nov 2009, at 18:45, Aleksey Lim wrote:
 
  On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
  On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org 
  wrote:
  I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4]
  
  Good to see progress on this. Much appreciated. Some questions...
  
  - Why is the depcheck happening at first start time? Install time
  seems be more appropriate: install time means there is a src of
  software, needed deps can be grabbed from the same src if present...
  
  in that case we entirely depend on 0install, so sugar provide just new
  GUI for 0launch(here just for downloading/building dependencies).
  
  - What happens if the deps are missing? If the user is offline?
  
  activity fails to start but in case of offline, 0install provides some
  options that could be useful for users(0share, 0mirror).
  
  - What happens when the build fails?
  
  activity just fails, and of course we can add some kind of bugreporting
  feature.
 
 First up, to be honest, I don't plan to use or involve myself with 0install 
 for any activities I'm involved with

 (may be if it works invisibly as a worst case fallback)...

if you have ready to use 0depend.xml file(for example from another
activity which uses the same deps) you as developer should only place
it to activity/ directory and for users starting this activity means
only having additional downloading progressbar(for the first time).

 But, if a deployment/teacher wanted to distribute one (or several) of these 
 non-Sugar compliant installs on a USB stick for remote class installation, is 
 it a trivial step for them to put 'the activity' on a stick so it can be 
 installed without any network access or local server at install time?

0install integration is just an optional addon to activity bundles,
you can all time package fat .xos as usual.

 Example: Teacher travels from a remote village to an education ministry or 
 town with internet access once a month. Downloads a selection of new 
 activities and content from ASLO to their USB stick. Journeys back to their 
 village and uses the USB stick to install/upgrade each machine, kids also 
 share the activity .xo bundle from Journal with friends who can't make it to 
 the school.

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Install_integration#Deploy_0install_packages_from_ASLO_like_a_regular_sugar_activities

as an addition, we can support offline mode for such activities
(request for downloading all required deps for all such activities
by one click).

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:05:21PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
   - Why is the depcheck happening at first start time? Install time
  seems be more appropriate: install time means there is a src of
  software, needed deps can be grabbed from the same src if present...
 
  in that case we entirely depend on 0install, so sugar provide just new
  GUI for 0launch(here just for downloading/building dependencies).
 
 So it'll be triggered when users download  run an .xo? When they
 double-click an .xo from a USB disk?

0install procedures will be triggered on avery activity launch,
but we can trigger them on uploading such bundle to
journal(installation), so there won't be any differences
(in case of downloading from ASLO) between regular activities and
activities w/ 0install dependencies

 Will there be a way (control panel?) to see the disk space taken by
 0install stuff and prune/uninstall parts?

dunno, I guess in most cases its a designers question
I thought about simple download progress bar for launcher
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/File:0depend-launcher.png,
control panel for setup 0install settings and we can have context menu
item for activities that have 0install dependencies to show 0install status.

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:22:23PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
  Example: Teacher travels from a remote village to an education ministry or 
  town with internet access once a month. Downloads a selection of new 
  activities and content from ASLO to their USB stick. Journeys back to their 
  village and uses the USB stick to install/upgrade each machine, kids also 
  share the activity .xo bundle from Journal with friends who can't make it 
  to the school.
 
 http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Install_integration#Deploy_0install_packages_from_ASLO_like_a_regular_sugar_activities
 
 as an addition, we can support offline mode for such activities
 (request for downloading all required deps for all such activities
 by one click).

..and share such dependencies by http://0install.net/0share.html

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-23 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:00:49PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:22:23PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
  On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
   Example: Teacher travels from a remote village to an education ministry 
   or town with internet access once a month. Downloads a selection of new 
   activities and content from ASLO to their USB stick. Journeys back to 
   their village and uses the USB stick to install/upgrade each machine, 
   kids also share the activity .xo bundle from Journal with friends who 
   can't make it to the school.
  
  http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Install_integration#Deploy_0install_packages_from_ASLO_like_a_regular_sugar_activities
  
  as an addition, we can support offline mode for such activities
  (request for downloading all required deps for all such activities
  by one click).
 
 ..and share such dependencies by http://0install.net/0share.html

or doing something similar to http://roscidus.com/desktop/Zero2Bundle
or http://0install.net/0export.html

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-12 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:51, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
 Hi all,

 To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
 I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
 in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned
 repos[2] and follow simple test case[3].

Hi,

I would like to know more about how the experience changes for
activity authors and what happens when the .xo is not downloaded from
the web but copied from an usb stick.

Thanks,

Tomeu

 [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend
 [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend#Scope
 [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend#How_To_Test

 --
 Aleksey
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




-- 
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
Farning
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] 0depend feature request

2009-11-12 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:51, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
  I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
  in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned
  repos[2] and follow simple test case[3].
 
 Hi,
 
 I would like to know more about how the experience changes for
 activity authors

0depend is just optional feature, for bundles that have
activity/0depend.xml file, while launching activity sugar(via 0install)
will download(or build, just 0install feature) all dependencies that
are mentioned in 0depend.xml and pass proper info via environment variables
(PATH, PYTHONPATH etc) to activity startup.

 and what happens when the .xo is not downloaded from
 the web but copied from an usb stick.

only 0depend.xml makes sense(its just regular bundle file), if it exists,
shell will enable 0install integration.

 Thanks,
 
 Tomeu
 
  [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend
  [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend#Scope
  [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Zero_Depend#How_To_Test
 
  --
  Aleksey
  ___
  Sugar-devel mailing list
  Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
 What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
 Farning
 

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel