[freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now?  I'm getting lots of
pages taking forever to load (or never loading), and I think it's still
using 100% CPU on my 200 mhz router on 768k (up and down) DSL, even
though the browser is on another machine...
I was planning to make a permanent node, but I don't run it much
anymore, because my brother games (so he needs high bandwidth and low
latency), and Freenet is still the most costly service I run on that
thing (in terms of CPU, bandwidth, etc.)
I know it's been mentioned before, but I'll state for the record that I
think Java was a bad choice.  Rather than start a new flame war, I'd
like to go read up on why it was chosen (any archives I should look at?).
For the record, I have never, ever seen a java program load quickly, run
even tolerably fast for anything beyond the most basic things, and I've
never seen an open source implementation of Java work firsthand.  I
don't like the syntax, but that's a personal issue -- I'd love to be
proven wrong on this.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=pgvD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] RE: start-problems

2004-07-10 Thread evolution
Quoting Garb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I too am running Freenet from Gentoo (kernel 2.6.7),

I too!

 my initial joy over finding it in the portage tree and thus being able to
 simply emerge it was quicly cooled by the fact, that the configuration E-build
 appears broken.

Wow.  I had the opposite experience.  I've run from a manual install for the
longest time.  But here about two weeks ago I installed from Portage, and I was
amazed at how well it handled the install.  I especially liked the pre-made
init script.  I didn't have any problems with the configuration.

Clever idea, transferring freenet.ini to freenet.conf.  How did you know to
change the paths to /var/freenet and so on?

 Rc-update add freenet default

With a lower-case 'r', of course.

Overall, I'm very happy with the Portage installation of Freenet.

-todd

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Problems following loss of Internet connection

2004-07-10 Thread Nicholas Sturm
 I don't know if my experience using the Windows version of Freenet 
will apply when using any other operating systems.

 I've tested the result of loss of Internet connection, both 
spontaneously and intentionally, enough times that I am confident 
Freenet cannot recover to effectively use the network until it is 
manually stopped and restarted.  I believe it is necessary to actually 
exit from Freenet before it can reestablish proper communication.  
Several that reported continued 100% CPU usage may have been 
experiencing this behavior without recognizing that loss of Internet 
connection was the cause.  One may not loose all the learning and 
integration into the network after doing an exit and restart, but it 
seems to take longer to attain smooth function after such a restart than 
when one simply does a normal shutdown and startup several hours later.  
It appears that many inbound or outbound connection fail to be 
established readily after lost of the internet connection (probably 
because they have backed off of a badly performing link).

 Can any other Windows user confirm my experience?
N.S.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Heartbeat Message

2004-07-10 Thread S
This is a test to see whether or not the mailing lists are working
properly.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Paul
Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all
the crypto required for even simple connections.

a href=http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45250;Java vs C++/a


Java vs C++ Shootout Revisited
June 15, 2004

Summary
I was sick of hearing people say Java was slow, says Keith Lea,
so I took the benchmark code for C++ and Java from the now outdated
Great Computer Language Shootout (Fall 2001) and ran the tests
myself. Lea's results three years on? Java, he finds, is
significantly faster than optimized C++ in many cases.

img src=http://www.kano.net/javabench/graph;




On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:15:50 -0500, David Masover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now?  I'm getting lots of
 pages taking forever to load (or never loading), and I think it's still
 using 100% CPU on my 200 mhz router on 768k (up and down) DSL, even
 though the browser is on another machine...
 
 I was planning to make a permanent node, but I don't run it much
 anymore, because my brother games (so he needs high bandwidth and low
 latency), and Freenet is still the most costly service I run on that
 thing (in terms of CPU, bandwidth, etc.)
 
 I know it's been mentioned before, but I'll state for the record that I
 think Java was a bad choice.  Rather than start a new flame war, I'd
 like to go read up on why it was chosen (any archives I should look at?).
 
 For the record, I have never, ever seen a java program load quickly, run
 even tolerably fast for anything beyond the most basic things, and I've
 never seen an open source implementation of Java work firsthand.  I
 don't like the syntax, but that's a personal issue -- I'd love to be
 proven wrong on this.
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
 iQIVAwUBQO4b9ngHNmZLgCUhAQLCTA//frjR/duxAbReDA13WmWZQLA9LQdzcJ2v
 2GJ+kv80fJC+P1U6h6/ghv+oTrNUDCnZweLNYRm5G6WNDiNPdnyFiNRe3+arfQsh
 TR3BCc1CwIn/TuO/7s0V4pjIpGnQgySx3VAy9i8ujYtCV5t6Kkdaps6tC4x32tzM
 ZFo3gXWjuQ0zGF1psBRlwH84+ia5lDjSqBjOK7P47FKAXk1/vOocSYAztrCuIgw0
 qYK5oYStm/3miLzid08B4Mni0GL5m4+HlmitBgt2nVgqNhaKZN/HtUWtCVU8wNhR
 55XhmkR3+nHhO994R7U2/DRyYo7w7Yv6obaZsqEZE+ddUYErjfwb2XLr+T1OgM0F
 hQaXPzGY1Onc9Yb9a3iZPkdVVTCPbcKHK0nrjZkei6VJ90oANurMNUgo4ZyHtuZT
 BFMq44b6AVqa6quandxEcQzhqy6uqhvXVin6l0PCzxtcUZHXQacjrEvgqNngXZl0
 gvcOiPoKN/rH7vAXdHG9C4F+ZuSXAenWUWsgspyxvoPXItTMIMxbKQBG7wnYJu9w
 ahEHIGGdhks6eRgnq/hrroL/yzV3uEa5qhrmSqdRqW68Nr90kgHkJitUCqSKG/LZ
 fLTR75QC+L+n148Z3V5uHaTQSwjazDrnJ65Ln7apzANpdR9dmO+7cpm4EBFCmZiH
 NbTMfmg3wHQ=
 =pgvD
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 Support mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Friday 09 July 2004 12:15 am, David Masover wrote:
 What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now?  I'm getting lots of
 pages taking forever to load (or never loading), and I think it's still
 using 100% CPU on my 200 mhz router on 768k (up and down) DSL, even
 though the browser is on another machine...

My node isn't running too well either, even after leaving it on for a few 
days.  Did you leave it running while properly opening up the port it uses 
for incoming connections in your firewall (if needed)?

 I was planning to make a permanent node, but I don't run it much
 anymore, because my brother games (so he needs high bandwidth and low
 latency), and Freenet is still the most costly service I run on that
 thing (in terms of CPU, bandwidth, etc.)

I have an 2.5G Athlon XP w/ 1G of RAM and I don't notice that it's running.  
It tends to play nice on my system regardless of my success in getting any 
data out of it.

 I know it's been mentioned before, but I'll state for the record that I
 think Java was a bad choice.  Rather than start a new flame war, I'd
 like to go read up on why it was chosen (any archives I should look at?).

That's a good idea.  A discussion based on backing out of Java at this point 
is totally pointless and would set the project back another X years.  I'm 
not sure my archives even go back that far, but the basis for choosing Java 
should be obvious; platform independence and a rich API that comes standard 
with the language.

 For the record, I have never, ever seen a java program load quickly, run
 even tolerably fast for anything beyond the most basic things, and I've
 never seen an open source implementation of Java work firsthand.  I
 don't like the syntax, but that's a personal issue -- I'd love to be
 proven wrong on this.

You don't have much experience with Java then.  Freenet is atypical of a 
Java application IMO.  I would argue that Java has found a nice home in the 
Web Services market (JSP, Servlets, EJB), but Freenet attempts to be all 
things that Java isn't necessarily good at (for starters, NIO is something 
not necessary for most web apps).

All this aside, when routing doesn't work in Freenet it can't be blamed on 
the language it was implemented in.  Broken routing can easily be coded in 
C, Python, assembler or whatever language you desire.  On the other hand 
being tied to a proprietary language like Java under Sun's control isn't 
helping matters much.  It's hoped this will change when one of the Free 
Software implementations of Java (gcj, Kaffe) becomes more stable wrt 
Freenet.

-- 
Jay Oliveri
GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54
FCPTools Maintainer
www.sf.net/users/joliveri
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Nicholas Sturm

All this aside, when routing doesn't work in Freenet it can't be blamed on 
the language it was implemented in.  Broken routing can easily be coded in 
C, Python, assembler or whatever language you desire.  On the other hand 
being tied to a proprietary language like Java under Sun's control isn't 
helping matters much.  It's hoped this will change when one of the Free 
Software implementations of Java (gcj, Kaffe) becomes more stable wrt 
Freenet.

 

I lost the meaning in the last sentence.  What was intended by wrt?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] OK I've given up on this LAN

2004-07-10 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 08:38:28AM +, phil wrote:
 Security policy won't allow setting of fixed IP  freenet won't work.

Well, technically, you could run Freenet anyway. It's just that it would
take a little longer to learn its way around the network. You do have
the ability to open connections to any host on the internet on any port,
right?
 
 Thanks anyway.

Thanks for your interest.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:15:50PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 
 
 What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now?  

I'm not sure. It depends on various factors. For example, which branch
you are running.

 I'm getting lots of
 pages taking forever to load (or never loading),

On stable? How many live connections? Do you get RNFs? DNFs?

 and I think it's still
 using 100% CPU on my 200 mhz router on 768k (up and down) DSL, even
 though the browser is on another machine...

:(

How much RAM does it have? We have had reports of reasonable performance
on that class of hardware. OTOH, it's not a big priority at the moment.
First make it work. Then make it work fast.. Most machines running
Freenet are probably 5 times faster than the above hardware...
 
 I was planning to make a permanent node, but I don't run it much
 anymore, because my brother games (so he needs high bandwidth and low
 latency), and Freenet is still the most costly service I run on that
 thing (in terms of CPU, bandwidth, etc.)

I don't think Freenet's bandwidth limiting is unobtrusive enough for
gaming. Having said that, a gamer will tell you that ANYTHING else
running on the connection will increase his ping. Even if it doesn't! :)
 
 I know it's been mentioned before, but I'll state for the record that I
 think Java was a bad choice.  Rather than start a new flame war, I'd
 like to go read up on why it was chosen (any archives I should look at?).

Ian liked it. Ian was the original coder. Java is a reasonable
OO-procedural language which has a number of eccentricities. Most of
those will be rectified when GCJ works. If we had used C++, we'd have
spent a year arguing over whether to include a garbage collector. If 
we had used Ocaml, we'd have had even fewer coders than we have now. 
Etc etc.
 
 For the record, I have never, ever seen a java program load quickly, run
 even tolerably fast for anything beyond the most basic things, and I've
 never seen an open source implementation of Java work firsthand.  I
 don't like the syntax, but that's a personal issue -- I'd love to be
 proven wrong on this.

I've seen all of the above. Get hold of a copy of Eclipse compiled under
GCJ sometime...
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Christopher Brian Jack


On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Nicholas Sturm wrote:

 helping matters much.  It's hoped this will change when one of the Free
 Software implementations of Java (gcj, Kaffe) becomes more stable wrt
 Freenet.
 
 I lost the meaning in the last sentence.  What was intended by wrt?

with-respect-to

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] starting probs

2004-07-10 Thread Florian Streck
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 03:17:11PM +0200, rensinghoff wrote:
 Am Mi, den 07.07.2004 schrieb Paul um 18:25:
...
 SO it is better to get a dyndns account and i got that, but now as
 always on linux i got really sidetracked.
 
 So i have an account and the ddclient, of course setting up ddclient
 seems to be another complicated task ..router settings etc
 
 Is it ok if i ask for help on that list here, or is it OFF-Topic ?
 
 I always have the same problem: How can i test at which point the
 connection is not working.. Here with ddclient, how do i find the
 error..

You are using syslog=yes. So have a look at your logfiles for error or
success messages.

 so here is my ddclient.conf
...
 daemon=300# check every 300 seconds
 syslog=yes# log update msgs to syslog
 mail=root # mail all msgs to root
 mail-failure=root # mail failed update msgs to root
 pid=/var/run/ddclient.pid # record PID in file.
 #
...
 fw=192.168.2.1
 fw-login=nurense fw-password=carlito  # FW login and
 password
 ## To obtain an IP address from FW status page (using fw-login,
 fw-password)
 use=fw, fw=192.168.2.1/status_main.htm, fw-skip='IP Address' # found
 after IP Address
 # server=members.dyndns.org,  \
 # protocol=dyndns2\
 # your-dynamic-host.dyndns.org
...
 ##
 ## OrgDNS.org account-configuration
 ##
 use=web, web=members.orgdns.org/nic/ip
 server=www.orgdns.org \
 protocol=dyndns2  \
 login=soundgigi   \
 password=carlito  \
 soundgigi.orgdns.org

Are you using OrgDNS or dyndns? A few line down you mention that your
domain is soundgigi.dyndns.org. So I would use the configuration part
for dyndns (especially the server). And please change the password
before anyone on the list does it for you ;-)

 
 Did i miss something fundamental ?
except the server ? no.
 
 
 Just to understand
 
 the ddclient connects automatically to dyndns, so it extracts the
 current ip-adress from the router ant that is linked to my domain..which
 is soundgigi.dyndns.org
 
 so i should be able to ping that domain name if the connection works,
 right ??

If your router answers to pings yes. It's perhaps safer to do a
dns lookup for soundgigi.dyndns.org after you connected. It should
point to the IP that you are using at the moment.
A ping to that adress might go to another host so it's not a proof that
everything worked.

 
 So and after that i set my IP in the freenet.config to
 soundgigi.dyndns.org, right ?

yes.

 I appreciate your help very much !!


-- 
str-str_pok |= SP_FBM; /* deep magic */
s = (unsigned char*)(str-str_ptr); /* deeper magic */
 -- Larry Wall in util.c from the perl source code


pgpRwzEEYyqNP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Current data store size in web interface?

2004-07-10 Thread Weiliang Zhang
Is that any place that shows the current data store size in the web 
interface?

--
Best regards,
Weiliang Zhang
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] What are the scales for the histogram plots?

2004-07-10 Thread Weiliang Zhang
Toad wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 01:00:25PM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote:
Specifically, the I am referring to the histograms that you can get from
/servlet/nodestatus/. Also does the Y axis represent the entire key space?

Counts of keys usually. Try the raw links...
If that's the case, the bars in the histograms would grow indefinitely?? 
There seems to be a maximum, when reached, the bars stop growing. That 
might be explaining why we are seeing de-specialisation? Shouldn't we 
use ratios instead?

Best regards,
Weiliang Zhang
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Confirmation

2004-07-10 Thread tim



This is to confirm receipt on 
thunderbird.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Re: Current data store size in web interface?

2004-07-10 Thread Wayne McDougall
Weiliang Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Is that any place that shows the current data store size in the web 
 interface?

Internals*Environment Data Store section

http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/internal/env


Data Store  



Maximum size900 MiB
Used space  920,544 KiB
Free space  1,056 KiB
Percent used99
Total keys  2476
Space used by temp files6,052 KiB
Maximum space for temp files314,572,809 Bytes
Most recent file access timeSun Jul 11 16:25:08 NZST 2004
Least recent file access time   Fri Jul 09 23:04:23 NZST 2004





___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]