[freenet-support] Active transfers too high

2004-12-29 Thread freenetproject
My node often overloads with too many transfers.  You will see that I 
have 467 active transfers transmitting.

**Connections [Switch to peers mode]**
Wed Dec 29 10:03:30 PST 2004
[More details]
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)   70 (12/58/100)
Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving)   467 (462/5)
Data waiting to be transferred  47 KiB
Total amount of data transferred2,002 MiB
**Enviroment**
Architecture and Operating System   

Architecturei386
Available processors1
Operating SystemLinux
OS Version  2.6.5-7.111.5-default
Java Virtual Machine
JVM Vendor  Sun Microsystems Inc.
JVM NameJava HotSpot(TM) Server VM
JVM Version 1.5.0-b64
Memory Allocation   
Maximum memory the JVM will allocate259,264 KiB
Memory currently allocated by the JVM   259,264 KiB
Memory in use   221,159,704 Bytes
Estimated memory used by logger None
Unused allocated memory 44,326,632 Bytes
Data Store  
Maximum size117,187,500 KiB
Used space  24,037,700 KiB
Free space  93,149,800 KiB
Percent used20
Total keys  91753
Space used by temp files966,116 KiB
Maximum space for temp files40,000,001,192 Bytes

**General Information**
Version Information  	
	
Node Version	0.5
Protocol Version	STABLE-1.51
Build Number	5100
CVS Revision	1.90.2.50.2.128
	Uptime 	
	 1 day 3 hours 57 minutes 	
	Load 	
Current routingTime	0ms
Current messageSendTimeRequest	0ms
Pooled threads running jobs	14 (7%)
Pooled threads which are idle	15
Current upstream bandwidth usage	12783 bytes/second (104%)
Reason for QueryRejecting requests:	Estimated load (130%)  overloadHigh 
(125%)Estimated load (130%)  overloadHigh (125%)
	It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requests 
for a limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node 
is overloaded or something is wrong (i.e. a bug).
Current estimated load for QueryReject purposes	130%
Current estimated load for rate limiting	133.3% [QueryRejecting all 
incoming requests!]
Reason for load:	Load due to thread limit = 7%
Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (100%)
Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 20% = 100ms / 500ms = overloadLow 
(100%)
Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 129.8% because 
outputBytes(765706)  limit (589824.009 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * 
outputBandwidthLimit (12288) * 60
Load due to CPU usage = 133.3% = 100% / 0.75
Load due to expected inbound transfers: 1.8% because: 4727.252702849095 
req/hr * 0.00277850822403 (pTransfer) * 268259.0 bytes = 3523504 
bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 
2949120 (output limit assumed smaller than input capacity) * 60 * 1.1 = 
194641920 bytes/hr target
Load due to expected outbound transfers: 0.1% because: 69.17398158133034 
req/hr * 0.0010(999 0s, 1 1s, 1000 total) (pTransfer) * 268259.0 bytes = 
18556 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxOutputBytes/minute 
= 516095 * 60 = 30965759 bytes/hr target
Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to 
load):	0.729
Current estimated requests per hour:	4417.545876413522
Current global quota (requests per hour):	2235.1086113701913
Current global quota limit from bandwidth (requests per hour): 
164903.3210442147
Highest seen bytes downloaded in one minute:	1595458
Current outgoing request rate	4727.252702849095
Current probability of a request succeeding by routing	0.7%
Current probability of an inbound request causing a transfer outwards	0.1%
Current target (best case single node) probability of a request 
succeeding	3.7%


**Node Status Info**
Uptime:   1 day,   4 hours,   0 minutes
Current routingTime: 0ms.
Pooled threads running jobs: 11 (5.5%)   [QueryRejecting all 
incoming requests!]
Pooled threads which are idle: 18
It's normal for the node to sometimes reject connections or requests for 
a limited period. If you're seeing rejections continuously the node is 
overloaded or something is wrong (i.e. a bug). Current estimated load 
for rate limiting: 127.4%.
Load due to thread limit = 5.5%
Load due to routingTime = 10% = 100ms / 1000ms = overloadLow (100%)
Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 20% = 100ms / 500ms = overloadLow 
(100%)
Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 127.4% because 
outputBytes(751185)  limit (589824.009 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * 
outputBandwidthLimit (12288) * 60
Load due to CPU usage = 102.7% = 77% / 0.75
Load due to expected inbound transfers: 1.8% because: 4727.252702849095 
req/hr * 0.00277850822403 (pTransfer) * 268290.0 bytes = 3523911 
bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 
2949120 (output limit assumed smaller than input capacity) * 60 * 1.1 = 
194641920 bytes/hr target
Load due to expected outbound transfers: 0.1% because: 63.31118607638463 
req/hr * 0.0010(999 0s, 1 1s, 1000 total) (pTransfer) * 268290.0 bytes = 
16985 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but 

[freenet-support] docs for x86_64 ?

2004-12-29 Thread rednoise

Wanted to try to get freenet running in Linux x86_64, tried but wouldn't work
and was wondering if there was any info on making it work

By the way, I tried going to dodo.freenetproject.org and was greeted by
Placeholder for lawtracker.org website

What's lawtracker.org ?
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] A few ideas/thoughts i would like to share with

2004-12-29 Thread Newsbyte
I think those were all good comments (though not mentionned for the first
time ;-). Some of them I have proposed years ago, but...well...it somehow
never amounts to anything. The problem with all these proposals is, that
someone actually has to implement it. That seldom happens. I dunno
why...natural inertia, perhaps. Or just busy with coding or something. It's
a bit like the finance/sponsor-page I was going to make; all thought it was
a good idea, but at the end, it didn't happen, but it can't be said that's
my fault; the Higher Gods had a change of mind. Ah well, at least we're
shown the total income, so my whining helped a bit in improving things :-).


I think your suggestions are wortwhile, but I don't see much reaction, as
yet. I'm wondering what Ian or Toad thinks of it. With a bit luck, they will
give an elaborate response (not impossible, seen the pleasant surprise that
Ian made a thoughtful response on my post about tor/freenet - even though he
said he would never read anything of me again ;-). I was very pleasantly
surprised, I must say. And I'm curious about any further response people
might give to your post as well.

As for the mirror; I used to make and distribute a SCIP on the wiki, but I
stopped it because of the constantly changing builds that didn't talk with
earlier builds. It was a bit too labor intensive for me. Irony is, that now
the build hasn't changed in quite a while ;-). Anyway, I could, I guess,
place something similar on the site, but someone else would have to maintain
it. And preferably work with that freecaching-system, because the wiki can't
handle mass-d/l of big amounts of data. (Not that it's likely to happen, if
the normal site is accesable - exept maybe in case of a slashdot). But a
real mirror wouldn't be a bad idea, indeed.

thanks for your input, sonax.

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] docs for x86_64 ?

2004-12-29 Thread Mika Hirvonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted to try to get freenet running in Linux x86_64, tried but wouldn't work
and was wondering if there was any info on making it work
What exactly did you do? I had no trouble getting Freenet to run on 
x86_64 with Sun's latest JVM, but getting native FEC and 
NativeBigInteger to work is a bit trickier. I'll post instructions when 
I figure it out myself.

By the way, I tried going to dodo.freenetproject.org and was greeted by
Placeholder for lawtracker.org website
What's lawtracker.org ?
I don't know.
--
  Mika Hirvonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://nightwatch.mine.nu/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]