Re: [freenet-support] temp files from gateway

2005-01-21 Thread Marco A. Calamari
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 17:02 +, Toad wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:36:13PM +, Ben Golding wrote:
  Doesn't storing decrypted data on disk break the deniability property
  of Freenet, which is important for freedom of speech?
 
 I'd have to check what the current behaviour is... I think we use
 temporary file buckets and don't encrypt them, in fproxy, at present...
 We should fix this, obviously.

Another check on next minor release IMHO useful would be
 delete all file stored in cleartext BOTH when shutting
 down the node and when starting it.
I mean all file in store/temp and the dir store/temp
 itself (to clean temo filenames)
Another useful addition would be an config option to
 clean all clearinfo places: client-download (both
 content and dir), that can be used by others if the node is an
 http gateway (has the fproxy port public), logfile
 that from time to time can contain keynames in weird
 messages or other internal information as stacktraces.
Doing this with a simple wiping algoritm (fill with
 zero before deletion) would be another good thing.

JM2C.   Marco

  
  (after all, you can disable writing the cache to disk, even in IE!)
  
  Ben Golding
  
  - Original message -
  From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: support@freenetproject.org
  Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:53:51 +
  Subject: Re: [freenet-support] temp files from gateway
  
  The encrypted files are stored in the store.
  The decrypted files may be stored in the temp directory as well. Which
  is often in the store, subdir temp.
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 

Oggi e' il domani di cui ci dovevamo preoccupare ieri.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] temp files from gateway

2005-01-21 Thread Toad
Filling with 0's then deleting is not reliable on journaled
filesystems.. the files should be encrypted in the first place. A while
back somebody did some changes to make sure that keys don't show up if
logLevel is less than debug (or minor?)..

On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:23:15AM +0100, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
 On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 17:02 +, Toad wrote:
  On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:36:13PM +, Ben Golding wrote:
   Doesn't storing decrypted data on disk break the deniability property
   of Freenet, which is important for freedom of speech?
  
  I'd have to check what the current behaviour is... I think we use
  temporary file buckets and don't encrypt them, in fproxy, at present...
  We should fix this, obviously.
 
 Another check on next minor release IMHO useful would be
  delete all file stored in cleartext BOTH when shutting
  down the node and when starting it.
 I mean all file in store/temp and the dir store/temp
  itself (to clean temo filenames)
 Another useful addition would be an config option to
  clean all clearinfo places: client-download (both
  content and dir), that can be used by others if the node is an
  http gateway (has the fproxy port public), logfile
  that from time to time can contain keynames in weird
  messages or other internal information as stacktraces.
 Doing this with a simple wiping algoritm (fill with
  zero before deletion) would be another good thing.
 
 JM2C.   Marco
 
   
   (after all, you can disable writing the cache to disk, even in IE!)
   
   Ben Golding
   
   - Original message -
   From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: support@freenetproject.org
   Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:53:51 +
   Subject: Re: [freenet-support] temp files from gateway
   
   The encrypted files are stored in the store.
   The decrypted files may be stored in the temp directory as well. Which
   is often in the store, subdir temp.
  ___
  Support mailing list
  Support@freenetproject.org
  http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
  Unsubscribe at 
  http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
  Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -- 
 
 Oggi e' il domani di cui ci dovevamo preoccupare ieri.



 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] temp files from gateway

2005-01-21 Thread dave
If you're worried about tempfiles you might want to store your files in an
encrypted filesystem  (or e.g. an encrypted folder on Windows XP)

 Filling with 0's then deleting is not reliable on journaled
 filesystems.. the files should be encrypted in the first place. A while
 back somebody did some changes to make sure that keys don't show up if
 logLevel is less than debug (or minor?)..

 On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:23:15AM +0100, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
 On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 17:02 +, Toad wrote:
  On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:36:13PM +, Ben Golding wrote:
   Doesn't storing decrypted data on disk break the deniability
 property
   of Freenet, which is important for freedom of speech?
 
  I'd have to check what the current behaviour is... I think we use
  temporary file buckets and don't encrypt them, in fproxy, at
 present...
  We should fix this, obviously.

 Another check on next minor release IMHO useful would be
  delete all file stored in cleartext BOTH when shutting
  down the node and when starting it.
 I mean all file in store/temp and the dir store/temp
  itself (to clean temo filenames)
 Another useful addition would be an config option to
  clean all clearinfo places: client-download (both
  content and dir), that can be used by others if the node is an
  http gateway (has the fproxy port public), logfile
  that from time to time can contain keynames in weird
  messages or other internal information as stacktraces.
 Doing this with a simple wiping algoritm (fill with
  zero before deletion) would be another good thing.

 JM2C.   Marco

  
   (after all, you can disable writing the cache to disk, even in IE!)
  
   Ben Golding
  
   - Original message -
   From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: support@freenetproject.org
   Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:53:51 +
   Subject: Re: [freenet-support] temp files from gateway
  
   The encrypted files are stored in the store.
   The decrypted files may be stored in the temp directory as well.
 Which
   is often in the store, subdir temp.
  ___
  Support mailing list
  Support@freenetproject.org
  http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
  Unsubscribe at
 http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
  Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 --

 Oggi e' il domani di cui ci dovevamo preoccupare ieri.



 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --
 Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
 ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Freenet: Error

2005-01-21 Thread cneal



Dear Freenet:

When running your application, I get the following 
error



  
  


  


  
  
  

  
  Freenet
  

  
  
  

  
  
  

  
  Route Not Found
  

  
  
  


  
  



  

Network Error

  



  



  


  Couldn't retrieve key: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]/YoYo// Hops To Live: 
  10
  Error: Route Not Found 
  Attempts were made to contact 1 nodes. 
  
0 were totally unreachable. 
1 restarted. 
0 cleanly rejected. 
0 backed off.
  Route Not Found messages mean that your node, or the rest of the 
  network, didn't find the data or enough nodes to send the request to. You 
  should retry, with the same Hops-To-Live; if it persists, there may be a 
  problem (check that your internet connection is working). Try reseeding 
  your node, and if that doesn't work, contact 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Change Hops To Live to  and  

  



Please tell me what I need in order to correct 
this.

Thank you

cneal
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet: Error

2005-01-21 Thread Toad
Hi. What version (build number) are you running, and under what operating
system?

If you go to Advanced mode on the Web Interface, then click on Open
Connections, how many connections are open (and how many are inbound) ?

Are you behind a NAT, firewall or DSL router?

On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:53:36PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear Freenet:
 
 When running your application, I get the following error
 
 
Freenet  
  
  
Route Not Found  
  
   

  Network Error  


  Couldn't retrieve key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/YoYo// 
   Hops To Live: 10
 
   Error: Route Not Found 
 
   Attempts were made to contact 1 nodes. 
 
 a.. 0 were totally unreachable. 
 b.. 1 restarted. 
 c.. 0 cleanly rejected. 
 d.. 0 backed off.
   Route Not Found messages mean that your node, or the rest of the 
 network, didn't find the data or enough nodes to send the request to. You 
 should retry, with the same Hops-To-Live; if it persists, there may be a 
 problem (check that your internet connection is working). Try reseeding your 
 node, and if that doesn't work, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   Change Hops To Live to  and  
   

 
 Please tell me what I need in order to correct this.
 
 Thank you
 
 cneal
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet: Error

2005-01-21 Thread dave
To correct this ..?
Freenet could not find the data.  I'm guessing this is the first time you
are running Freenet?

Did you try 'retrying' as the message below suggests?  How long have you
been running Freenet for?

Have you read any of the documentation about Freenet yet?  I recommend you
do this first...


thanks



 Dear Freenet:

 When running your application, I get the following error


Freenet


Route Not Found



  Network Error


  Couldn't retrieve key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/YoYo//
   Hops To Live: 10

   Error: Route Not Found

   Attempts were made to contact 1 nodes.

 a.. 0 were totally unreachable.
 b.. 1 restarted.
 c.. 0 cleanly rejected.
 d.. 0 backed off.
   Route Not Found messages mean that your node, or the rest of the
 network, didn't find the data or enough nodes to send the request
 to. You should retry, with the same Hops-To-Live; if it persists,
 there may be a problem (check that your internet connection is
 working). Try reseeding your node, and if that doesn't work, contact
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Change Hops To Live to  and



 Please tell me what I need in order to correct this.

 Thank you

 cneal___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] temp files from gateway

2005-01-21 Thread Marco A. Calamari
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 11:50 +, Toad wrote:
 Filling with 0's then deleting is not reliable on journaled
 filesystems.. the files should be encrypted in the first place. A while
 back somebody did some changes to make sure that keys don't show up if
 logLevel is less than debug (or minor?)..

Er Toad, you give me a negative answer only to
 my fourth point. Typical commit time for journaled
 filesystem is 5 to 15 seconds, so modification not
 writtend is just a possibility. This is not my
 concern.

Let me better explain my thoughts.

By design, Freenet must protect his users giving the
 greater anonimity possible and the greater plausible
 deniability possible.

AFAIK this philosophy must guide thru all
 implementation. Freenet must do his best to
 protect all his user (if this is an easy task)
 including user that doesn't know how use a cryptoloop
 or barely know how to install a windows program.
Naive, wrongdoer or stupid users must be protected
 too, as long as this is an easy task.

Delete all cleartext info as soon as they are no more
 necessary follow directly from this.
I understand that the nature of the Freenet code
 doesn't allow for an easy review if this happens
 always in the code.

BUT, I see really no reason why Fred must
 leave files filled of cleartext temporary info liying
 around, when Microsoft Word (R) itself lost this habit.

So OK, do not overwrite, just delete 
 temp  client-download files; at least the
 probability that a forensic analisys can
 recover it are greatly *reduced*.

I think a single code line somewhere in Fred
 can do this job. Ok this is not an
 interesting issue, but IMHO it close a big,
 trivial problem in current implementation
 and add a resilience that worth well implement it.

Or will be implemented only in 1.0 ?  ;)

Just my 2 eurocent.   Ciao.   Marco


 
 On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:23:15AM +0100, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
  On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 17:02 +, Toad wrote:
   On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 04:36:13PM +, Ben Golding wrote:
Doesn't storing decrypted data on disk break the deniability property
of Freenet, which is important for freedom of speech?
   
   I'd have to check what the current behaviour is... I think we use
   temporary file buckets and don't encrypt them, in fproxy, at present...
   We should fix this, obviously.
  
  Another check on next minor release IMHO useful would be
   delete all file stored in cleartext BOTH when shutting
   down the node and when starting it.
  I mean all file in store/temp and the dir store/temp
   itself (to clean temo filenames)
  Another useful addition would be an config option to
   clean all clearinfo places: client-download (both
   content and dir), that can be used by others if the node is an
   http gateway (has the fproxy port public), logfile
   that from time to time can contain keynames in weird
   messages or other internal information as stacktraces.
  Doing this with a simple wiping algoritm (fill with
   zero before deletion) would be another good thing.
  
  JM2C.   Marco
  

(after all, you can disable writing the cache to disk, even in IE!)

Ben Golding

- Original message -
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@freenetproject.org
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:53:51 +
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] temp files from gateway

The encrypted files are stored in the store.
The decrypted files may be stored in the temp directory as well. Which
is often in the store, subdir temp.
   ___
   Support mailing list
   Support@freenetproject.org
   http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
   Unsubscribe at 
   http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
   Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  -- 
  
  Oggi e' il domani di cui ci dovevamo preoccupare ieri.
 
 
 
  ___
  Support mailing list
  Support@freenetproject.org
  http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
  Unsubscribe at 
  http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
  Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 

Oggi e' il domani di cui ci dovevamo preoccupare ieri.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]