Re: [pfSense Support] traffic shapper: status queues broken as of 9-7 snapshot?
good decision on this note :) http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/chngview?cn=14347 I did a fresh reinstall/restore from a 9-18 iso and my traffic shaper is still busted. it's bummer that it did work in an earlier release though :( oh well, something to look forward to in 1.2 right? On 9/14/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read thru your forum post and i'm not sure what i can do to fix my situation. in the latest pfsense revisions, the acks are already set up to 25% bandwidth- and really what's troubling is that i've had the same configuration running perfectly for 3+ months. Just recently, these problems came up. But rebooting always makes the traffic shaper come back to life! Perhaps i'll try to do a reinstall, i've been doing upgrades to the system for a while, and there might be some cruft... On 9/14/06, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/14/06, Rob Terhaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So the reason why i started to dig into the status screen is because we've started to have issues with the traffic shaper- After about a day, it seems like the traffic shaper falls asleep, which manifests it's self in drop outs on our VOIP phones. A reboot fixes the problem. Here's some more information about my setup. (i apologize in advance if this is too much information :) ) We have two physical offices, and a 10baseT link between them. the main office is LAN on the pfsense, the 2nd office is opt1. I also have voip phones running on the LAN vlan4 (which is connected opt2), and vlan4 at the 2nd office (which is connected to opt3). Opt2 and opt3 are bridged so that the phones in the 2nd office on vlan4 can be routed to the phones on vlan4 on the LAN in the main office. __ __ .1.0/24 .2.0/24 main office routed 2nd office __ __ vlan4 bridged vlan 4 .4.0/24 [.4.0/24] The pfsense machine has 3 physical interfaces, WAN, LAN, OPT1. OPT2/3 are vlan interfaces that belong to LAN and OPT1, respectively. I'm using the pfsense traffic shaper on the bridged vlan connection. I set it up using the wizard, and only setup the provision for asterisk/voip. Visit the tips and tricks forum thread which discusses some issues to look for. Last I heard the shaper does not work with bridged interfaces. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a little leary about updating to the http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files which look like they might be the update files. One is Pfsense.img and the other is fullupdate. Please advise. I haven't done any updates yet. We have RC2 built Aug1 of 2006. No updates have yet been applied. Thanks -- Heath Henderson -- From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: support@pfsense.com Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:38:10 -0400 To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
On 9/19/06, Heath Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a little leary about updating to the http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files which look like they might be the update files. One is Pfsense.img and the other is fullupdate. Please advise. I haven't done any updates yet. We have RC2 built Aug1 of 2006. No updates have yet been applied. Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
On 9/19/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit. README?! What's that!? Shouldn't I just be asking questions and not READING!? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
You guys crack me up! :) Honestly, I'm surprised you have as much patience as you do! -Tim -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:46 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem On 9/19/06, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit. README?! What's that!? Shouldn't I just be asking questions and not READING!? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Any NAT-T users out there?
Please contact me. I have something for you. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RES: [pfSense Support] Any NAT-T users out there?
BTW, I know since the guy in the room beside me is working on it. -Mensagem original- De: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: terça-feira, 19 de setembro de 2006 14:36 Para: support@pfsense.com Assunto: Re: [pfSense Support] Any NAT-T users out there? On 9/19/06, Pedro Paulo de Magalhaes Oliveira Junior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What? If you don't know what I am asking then simply ignore. There are people out there that know what this is. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.4/424 - Release Date: 21/8/2006 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Any NAT-T users out there?
On 9/19/06, Pedro Paulo de Magalhaes Oliveira Junior [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, I know since the guy in the room beside me is working on it. Well, have them contact me. We need to get NAT-T tested. (It's done, needs testing). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
Thanks, I will plan this for end of day then. I have a hdd install so I should be ok. Thanks again. -- Heath Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1800 288 7750 -- From: Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: support@pfsense.com Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:59:30 +0200 To: support@pfsense.com Conversation: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem If you run off a hdd full installation upload the full update file at systemfirmware. It will apply the update and reboot after that. You won't lose your configuration, just a downtime for the reboot. If you run from a cf-card and used the embedded image to start with you have to reflash the card. The version you are running doesn't support updates. Updates for embedded builds was introduced some versions ago. The new version however will now be upgradable. Please note that the new image has a size of 128 mb so you need at least a 128 mb cf-card. This was needed to support updates for these platforms. If you run this kind of install the future upgradeprocess will be the same like for the full install but you have to upload the mini update file. Holger -Original Message- From: Heath Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 3:44 PM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a little leary about updating to the http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files which look like they might be the update files. One is Pfsense.img and the other is fullupdate. Please advise. I haven't done any updates yet. We have RC2 built Aug1 of 2006. No updates have yet been applied. Thanks -- Heath Henderson -- From: Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: support@pfsense.com Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:38:10 -0400 To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
Thanks, I couldn't get the readme to open. I did however get the snapshot files downloaded earlier so I am good to go now. Thanks for the suggestion though. -- Heath Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1800 288 7750 -- From: Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: support@pfsense.com Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:55:53 -0500 To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem On 9/19/06, Heath Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a little leary about updating to the http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files which look like they might be the update files. One is Pfsense.img and the other is fullupdate. Please advise. I haven't done any updates yet. We have RC2 built Aug1 of 2006. No updates have yet been applied. Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
