Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

2009-04-09 Thread Chris Buechler
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Dimitri Rodis
 wrote:
> Good deal. I'll go to a later snapshot then.
>
> Are upgrades between snapshots on embedded working at the moment, or should
> I just reflash?
>

Yeah you got hit with the xmlparse.inc issue that was in snapshots for
a couple days. I know CARP is fine in 1.2.3 outside of those couple
days, I've setup 3 CARP pairs on 1.2.3 in the past 2 weeks.

Reflash, and either redo your config from scratch or manually remove
anything that's out of whack.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] Outbound traffic + 1.2.2 + My last clump of hair

2009-04-09 Thread Tim Roberts
I have many 1.2.2 PFSense gateways running. Somehow I have managed to mangle 
all but one of them today for certain types of outbound traffic. 
HTTP/DNS/POP/SMTP are all fine and lightning fast. SSH, Secure POP, Secure 
SMTP, some gaming, are all dead from the LAN out. I have advanced outbound nat 
enabled with the default outbound nat rule. I read this: 
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Static_Port and it seems to fit the bill, but 
checking static port didnt help. Up until I rebooted these boxes, it was 
random, now these types of services are dead all the time. If it helps narrow 
it down, a few of these boxes have an OPT interface for a segmented network and 
coming through the OPT interfaces, everything is flawless outbound. I plopped 
up a brand new box with LAN/WAN/OPT and 1.2.2. Same thing. What am I missing? 
We ran 1.2.1 forever it seems with no issues and when I added a few new boxes, 
I decided to upgrade all of them to 1.2.2 to keep things standardized. 

Another complaint I had from a static hosted customer was that all of the 
traffic he is getting at his router from one of these PFSense boxes, shows the 
PFSense box LAN ip as the source ip of all traffic instead of the true public 
source ip. Thats even weirder but happens on only one of these gateways.

I have 1 LAN rule to allow * LAN traffic out. No WAN rules. No port forwards. 
No 1:1 Nats. Ive tried switching back to automic outbound NAT. Nadda.I have 1 
virtual LAN ip that is CARP for users gateway although I have not enabled the 
CARP service nor configured it yet.

I have one small clump of hair left. Any help would be much appreciated.

Tim

RE: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

2009-04-09 Thread Dimitri Rodis
Good deal. I'll go to a later snapshot then.

Are upgrades between snapshots on embedded working at the moment, or should
I just reflash?

Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC 
http://www.integritasystems.com


-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:37 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Dimitri Rodis
 wrote:
> The snapshot I'm using is dated April 1.. that's a couple of days after
the
> hackathon, I believe. Any idea when the xmlparse.inc from HEAD was
removed?

You where affected then.   It was removed for causing various problems
such as these.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

2009-04-09 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Dimitri Rodis
 wrote:
> The snapshot I'm using is dated April 1.. that's a couple of days after the
> hackathon, I believe. Any idea when the xmlparse.inc from HEAD was removed?

You where affected then.   It was removed for causing various problems
such as these.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



RE: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

2009-04-09 Thread Dimitri Rodis
The snapshot I'm using is dated April 1.. that's a couple of days after the
hackathon, I believe. Any idea when the xmlparse.inc from HEAD was removed?

Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC 
http://www.integritasystems.com


-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 10:17 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Dimitri Rodis
 wrote:
> I think this is more obscure than you think-- this is on a snapshot build,
> so how many people have 1) run a 1.2.3 snapshot, 2) _had_ a redundant CARP
> config, and then 3) removed the redundant member and 4) added some
Outbound
> NAT rules and interface rules (which is what finally triggered the XMLRPC
> sync, and thus the error)?
>
> My guess is that people with redundant configs are probably not testing
> snapshot builds (or even production builds) in this manner. I don't know
if
> this happens on previous builds, and you are probably going to say that
the
> code hasn't changed, and that's very likely to be true if you say so--I'm
> just saying I think the bug is present, but obscure.
>
> Obviously if it happens it's easy enough to fix by downloading the config,
> deleting the duped sections and uploading the config again, but I would
tend
> to think there's a bug in there somewhere, because like I said, I didn't
> dupe the section myself.

My guess would be that you installed a snapshot that contained
xmlparse.inc from HEAD.   Right around the hackathon time this was
included but has since been removed.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

2009-04-09 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Dimitri Rodis
 wrote:
> I think this is more obscure than you think-- this is on a snapshot build,
> so how many people have 1) run a 1.2.3 snapshot, 2) _had_ a redundant CARP
> config, and then 3) removed the redundant member and 4) added some Outbound
> NAT rules and interface rules (which is what finally triggered the XMLRPC
> sync, and thus the error)?
>
> My guess is that people with redundant configs are probably not testing
> snapshot builds (or even production builds) in this manner. I don't know if
> this happens on previous builds, and you are probably going to say that the
> code hasn't changed, and that's very likely to be true if you say so--I'm
> just saying I think the bug is present, but obscure.
>
> Obviously if it happens it's easy enough to fix by downloading the config,
> deleting the duped sections and uploading the config again, but I would tend
> to think there's a bug in there somewhere, because like I said, I didn't
> dupe the section myself.

My guess would be that you installed a snapshot that contained
xmlparse.inc from HEAD.   Right around the hackathon time this was
included but has since been removed.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] mptutil

2009-04-09 Thread slamp slamp
Has anyone used this utility on their pfsense install?

http://perforce.freebsd.org/depotTreeBrowser.cgi?FSPC=//depot/user/jhb/raid/usr.sbin/mptutil


I installed compiled it under FreeBSD 7.1 and when I run it in my
pfsense 1.2.2 install it is not working.

# ./mptutil show drives
mptutil: mpt_open: No such file or directory

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



RE: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

2009-04-09 Thread Dimitri Rodis
I think this is more obscure than you think-- this is on a snapshot build,
so how many people have 1) run a 1.2.3 snapshot, 2) _had_ a redundant CARP
config, and then 3) removed the redundant member and 4) added some Outbound
NAT rules and interface rules (which is what finally triggered the XMLRPC
sync, and thus the error)? 

My guess is that people with redundant configs are probably not testing
snapshot builds (or even production builds) in this manner. I don't know if
this happens on previous builds, and you are probably going to say that the
code hasn't changed, and that's very likely to be true if you say so--I'm
just saying I think the bug is present, but obscure.

Obviously if it happens it's easy enough to fix by downloading the config,
deleting the duped sections and uploading the config again, but I would tend
to think there's a bug in there somewhere, because like I said, I didn't
dupe the section myself.

Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC 


-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:sullr...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:15 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Dimitri Rodis
 wrote:
> Currently running:
>
> 1.2.3-RC1
> built on Wed Apr 1 16:59:10 EDT 2009
>
>
>
> Changed the CARP config-- had a redundant member that I removed, so I shut
> pfsync off. However, I kept getting messages along the top that XMLRPC
sync
> was failing. I checked, and it was disabled--so, I unchecked absolutely
> everything and saved and rebooted, but the errors persisted.
>
>
>
> I think I found the problem. I downloaded my config file and had a look.
> Check out the following section:
>
>
>
>   
>
>     
>
>   
>
>     
>
>     opt3
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>   
>
>       
>
>     on
>
>     opt3
>
>     
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>
> on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>
> on
>
>     
>
>     172.19.0.2
>
>     xx
>
>   
>
>   
>
>     on
>
>     opt3
>
>     
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>
> on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>
> on
>
>
> on
>
>     172.19.0.3
>
>     x
>
>   
>
>     
>
>   
>
>
>
>
>
> Shouldn't  only be in there once? Looks like it added
> another  section it each time I tried to change/save it,
> and it's only using the last one.
>
>
>
> Bug or user error?
>
>
>
> Dimitri Rodis
>
> Integrita Systems LLC
>
> http://www.integritasystems.com
>
>

Doubt its a bug or we would be seeing a lot more of this.

Scott


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [pfSense Support] CARP Bug in 1.2.3

2009-04-09 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Dimitri Rodis
 wrote:
> Currently running:
>
> 1.2.3-RC1
> built on Wed Apr 1 16:59:10 EDT 2009
>
>
>
> Changed the CARP config-- had a redundant member that I removed, so I shut
> pfsync off. However, I kept getting messages along the top that XMLRPC sync
> was failing. I checked, and it was disabled--so, I unchecked absolutely
> everything and saved and rebooted, but the errors persisted.
>
>
>
> I think I found the problem. I downloaded my config file and had a look.
> Check out the following section:
>
>
>
>   
>
>     
>
>   
>
>     
>
>     opt3
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>     
>
>   
>
>       
>
>     on
>
>     opt3
>
>     
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>
> on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>
> on
>
>     
>
>     172.19.0.2
>
>     xx
>
>   
>
>   
>
>     on
>
>     opt3
>
>     
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>
> on
>
>     on
>
>     on
>
>
> on
>
>
> on
>
>     172.19.0.3
>
>     x
>
>   
>
>     
>
>   
>
>
>
>
>
> Shouldn't  only be in there once? Looks like it added
> another  section it each time I tried to change/save it,
> and it's only using the last one.
>
>
>
> Bug or user error?
>
>
>
> Dimitri Rodis
>
> Integrita Systems LLC
>
> http://www.integritasystems.com
>
>

Doubt its a bug or we would be seeing a lot more of this.

Scott


Re: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down bandwidth usage...?

2009-04-09 Thread Gary Buckmaster

Jaime Díaz wrote:

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Chuck Mariotti  wrote:
  

Are either of these safe to run on embedded (Alix)? I did a custom install so 
that I can install Packages, so that I could run snort, but I can't seem to 
keep snort running, keeps shutting down by itself. So wonder if I'll run into 
any issues with these...

-Original Message-
From: Jaime Díaz [mailto:jnd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:50 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down 
bandwidth usage...?

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Chuck Mariotti  wrote:


Yesterday we had a huge hit on our bandwidth for a period of time... How are 
people tracking down bandwidth usage to specific machines, etc...?

By the time I captured some packets and pulled up wireshark, the hit was gone. 
It showed up later in the day, but again, too fast to track down.

Is there an easy way to track down specifically what machines are using up 
bandwidth?

Regards,

Chuck

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org


  

You could use bandwidthd or ntop to track down those users.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org





Sorry, I didn't knew you were running on an embedded platform.

I wouldn't run it on such hardware.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org


  
Judicious use of pftop should show you exactly which IP address(es) are 
consuming your bandwidth at the time so you can take appropriate 
action.  Spend some time learning the different screens of pftop and no 
further packages will be required. 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down bandwidth usage...?

2009-04-09 Thread Curtis LaMasters
I monitor ports on a managed switch with SNMP using Cacti or similar.
Obviously not for everyone but at least I can determine who the
problem child is. I have used NTOP in the past but my NTOP skills are
lacking.

Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com



On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Jaime Díaz  wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Chuck Mariotti  wrote:
>> Are either of these safe to run on embedded (Alix)? I did a custom install 
>> so that I can install Packages, so that I could run snort, but I can't seem 
>> to keep snort running, keeps shutting down by itself. So wonder if I'll run 
>> into any issues with these...
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jaime Díaz [mailto:jnd...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:50 AM
>> To: support@pfsense.com
>> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down 
>> bandwidth usage...?
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Chuck Mariotti  wrote:
>>> Yesterday we had a huge hit on our bandwidth for a period of time... How 
>>> are people tracking down bandwidth usage to specific machines, etc...?
>>>
>>> By the time I captured some packets and pulled up wireshark, the hit was 
>>> gone. It showed up later in the day, but again, too fast to track down.
>>>
>>> Is there an easy way to track down specifically what machines are using up 
>>> bandwidth?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>>>
>>> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You could use bandwidthd or ntop to track down those users.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
>> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>>
>> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
>> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>>
>> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>>
>>
>
> Sorry, I didn't knew you were running on an embedded platform.
>
> I wouldn't run it on such hardware.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>
> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down bandwidth usage...?

2009-04-09 Thread Jaime Díaz
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Chuck Mariotti  wrote:
> Are either of these safe to run on embedded (Alix)? I did a custom install so 
> that I can install Packages, so that I could run snort, but I can't seem to 
> keep snort running, keeps shutting down by itself. So wonder if I'll run into 
> any issues with these...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jaime Díaz [mailto:jnd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:50 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down 
> bandwidth usage...?
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Chuck Mariotti  wrote:
>> Yesterday we had a huge hit on our bandwidth for a period of time... How are 
>> people tracking down bandwidth usage to specific machines, etc...?
>>
>> By the time I captured some packets and pulled up wireshark, the hit was 
>> gone. It showed up later in the day, but again, too fast to track down.
>>
>> Is there an easy way to track down specifically what machines are using up 
>> bandwidth?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
>> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>>
>> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>>
>>
>
> You could use bandwidthd or ntop to track down those users.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>
> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>
> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>
>

Sorry, I didn't knew you were running on an embedded platform.

I wouldn't run it on such hardware.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down bandwidth usage...?

2009-04-09 Thread Paul Mansfield
Chuck Mariotti wrote:
> Are either of these safe to run on embedded (Alix)? I did a custom install so 
> that I can install Packages, so that I could run snort, but I can't seem to 
> keep snort running, keeps shutting down by itself. So wonder if I'll run into 
> any issues with these...


darkstat seems to be lighter on resource usage.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



RE: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down bandwidth usage...?

2009-04-09 Thread Chuck Mariotti
Are either of these safe to run on embedded (Alix)? I did a custom install so 
that I can install Packages, so that I could run snort, but I can't seem to 
keep snort running, keeps shutting down by itself. So wonder if I'll run into 
any issues with these...

-Original Message-
From: Jaime Díaz [mailto:jnd...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:50 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down 
bandwidth usage...?

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Chuck Mariotti  wrote:
> Yesterday we had a huge hit on our bandwidth for a period of time... How are 
> people tracking down bandwidth usage to specific machines, etc...?
>
> By the time I captured some packets and pulled up wireshark, the hit was 
> gone. It showed up later in the day, but again, too fast to track down.
>
> Is there an easy way to track down specifically what machines are using up 
> bandwidth?
>
> Regards,
>
> Chuck
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>
> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>
>

You could use bandwidthd or ntop to track down those users.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down bandwidth usage...?

2009-04-09 Thread Jaime Díaz
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Chuck Mariotti  wrote:
> Yesterday we had a huge hit on our bandwidth for a period of time... How are 
> people tracking down bandwidth usage to specific machines, etc...?
>
> By the time I captured some packets and pulled up wireshark, the hit was 
> gone. It showed up later in the day, but again, too fast to track down.
>
> Is there an easy way to track down specifically what machines are using up 
> bandwidth?
>
> Regards,
>
> Chuck
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
>
> Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
>
>

You could use bandwidthd or ntop to track down those users.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] Moving Target - How do people track down bandwidth usage...?

2009-04-09 Thread Chuck Mariotti
Yesterday we had a huge hit on our bandwidth for a period of time... How are 
people tracking down bandwidth usage to specific machines, etc...?

By the time I captured some packets and pulled up wireshark, the hit was gone. 
It showed up later in the day, but again, too fast to track down.

Is there an easy way to track down specifically what machines are using up 
bandwidth?

Regards,

Chuck

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org