Re: new computer
Pat Connors wrote: Please direct me on which files I need to copy and where to find them on my old computer. Plus, do I download the new version of Seamonkey on the new computer and then add the files from my old computer? Thanks for the help. Just get mozbackup, use it to backup your profile, and then use it to load the profile on the new machine. A lot simpler than mucking around with copying folders etc. http://mozbackup.jasnapaka.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: UPLOADING websites
In article kfwdnairw7na5yrwnz2dnuvz_tcdn...@mozilla.org, Beauregard T. Shagnasty a.nony.m...@example.invalid wrote: Ah so. Then my only remaining suggestion would be to get Linux/Unix! and Be In Charge! ;-) Why in the world would anyone do that and be limited on your apps, when you have Mac OSX which is Unix? -- Are there errors in the Bible? How should a church conduct its worship services? Is drinking Alcohol a sin? Is racism wrong? If you want to learn, get answers, and be able to defend the faith, CERM is your place. http://www.cerm.info ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Preventing remote content from loading into forwarded message
flyguy wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: flyguy wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: flyguy wrote: I have my email set to Block images and other content from remote sources. That works well; however, if I Forward the email, the remote content is loaded. Is there any way to prevent that from happening? Forward as text-only. My Forward button offers only Inline or Attachment - is there another way to do the Forward? Also, I usually want to preserve the email's links so the person I'm sending it to can obtain the remote content if they wish to do so. Inline is what I meant. In the case of an HTML message, the links are revealed, including web bugs and the like. Try it and see. I tried the Inline, which is how I normally send emails, but its message body looks the same as what I see when I read the email, and all the html is still there. No remote content in either case, of course, since I opened the Internet connection before forwarding. What would I see if there is a web bug? I doubt the ones I experimented with had any. I hadn't thought about how the web bug would still be active and refer to me. Is there any way to inhibit them so I can forward the email? If you're forwarding as plain text (Inline), the links become visible. For example, if I forward a message I just got from a political campaign, one paragraph looks like this: We are delighted to report that tomorrow evening's debate will be live-streamed on the internet, commencing at 7:30pm. You will be able to watch the live feed at: http://www.pcntv.com/ http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2c=alphabet_soup. But the original HTML mail looks like this: We are delighted to report that tomorrow evening's debate will be live-streamed on the internet, commencing at 7:30pm. You will be able to watch the live feed at: http://www.pcntv.com/. You see, the link to http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2c=alphabet_soup is displayed in the HTML as http://www.pcntv.com/ and it eventually takes you there, but only after the intermediate step of noting down who visited it based on the user ID (which I've replaced with alphabet_soup). When I forward messages like this, I comb through them for links with my ID number and remove them, because (as it happens) I want to continue receiving them, and I don't want someone three or four links down the forwarding chain unsubscribing me in an attempt to unsubscribe himself. More to your point, I have a piece of true spam which contains the following code (as above, I've munged the code number as code_number_here): strongimg name=3DACCOUNT.IMAGE.17 border=3D= 0 contenteditable=3Dfalse alt=3DTransparent GIF src=3Dhttp://ih.const= antcontact.com/fs073/code_number_here/img/17.gif //strongnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;= nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;strongemInsightn= bsp;fornbsp;Global Market Leaders/em/strong This displays in HTML as simply Transparent GIF Insight for Global Market because I have SeaMonkey set not to load remote content, so it displays the ALT text (stupid of them to include it, but whatever). If I forward the message inline, I get: *Transparent GIF* */Insight for Global Market/* As you can see, the link to the remote content is lost/deleted, and your recipient will see only the ALT text. It looks like I misspoke when I said web bugs would show as links. In fact, only true links show as links. HTH -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: UPLOADING websites
John wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Ah so. Then my only remaining suggestion would be to get Linux/Unix! and Be In Charge! ;-) Why in the world would anyone do that and be limited on your apps, when you have Mac OSX which is Unix? I do not know what you mean when you say be limited on your apps. I am using Ubuntu and I have all the apps I could ever need. There are around twenty thousand applications included in the repositories and all are free. You also missed the wink. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: UPLOADING websites
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: John wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Ah so. Then my only remaining suggestion would be to get Linux/Unix! and Be In Charge! ;-) Why in the world would anyone do that and be limited on your apps, when you have Mac OSX which is Unix? I do not know what you mean when you say be limited on your apps. I am using Ubuntu and I have all the apps I could ever need. There are around twenty thousand applications included in the repositories and all are free. You also missed thewink. Ditto for me and my Mandriva Linux!! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: inserting all e-mail addresses
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 4/8/2010 4:18 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: snip . or it gets filtered by the JMC in SeaMonkey. I have it set to delete Junk messages after seven days, and that folder contains 43 messages at the moment -- about six a day from seven different accounts. No big deal with a broadband connection. Paul, if it's spam, why do you want to keep it at all. I have my SM set up so that what SM thinks is spam is moved to the Trash folder, which I double-check just to make sure, then the Trash is deleted when SM is closed. Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: inserting all e-mail addresses
Daniel wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 4/8/2010 4:18 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: snip . or it gets filtered by the JMC in SeaMonkey. I have it set to delete Junk messages after seven days, and that folder contains 43 messages at the moment -- about six a day from seven different accounts. No big deal with a broadband connection. Paul, if it's spam, why do you want to keep it at all. I have my SM set up so that what SM thinks is spam is moved to the Trash folder, which I double-check just to make sure, then the Trash is deleted when SM is closed. Daniel My ISP has strict controls Spam but it get through anyway. I keep Spam only long enough to determine if someone I get legit mail from has been listed as Spam. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: UPLOADING websites
John wrote: In articlekfwdnairw7na5yrwnz2dnuvz_tcdn...@mozilla.org, Beauregard T. Shagnastya.nony.m...@example.invalid wrote: Ah so. Then my only remaining suggestion would be to get Linux/Unix! and Be In Charge! ;-) Why in the world would anyone do that and be limited on your apps, when you have Mac OSX which is Unix? Use you can boot into single user mode and run full unvarnished old timey command line Unix. If you have AppleJack installed That's the way you do it. You follow their commands and it impressively looking. Makes you realize if you use the wrong command you can really screw up your hard Drive. Then I worked for school system typing the wrong command in DOS can result in Hard drive becoming an expensive paperweight. I assume UNIX Linux is just as dangerous if you don't know what your doing. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: inserting all e-mail addresses
Daniel wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 4/8/2010 4:18 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: snip . or it gets filtered by the JMC in SeaMonkey. I have it set to delete Junk messages after seven days, and that folder contains 43 messages at the moment -- about six a day from seven different accounts. No big deal with a broadband connection. Paul, if it's spam, why do you want to keep it at all. I have my SM set up so that what SM thinks is spam is moved to the Trash folder, which I double-check just to make sure, then the Trash is deleted when SM is closed. That's exactly the point -- to have one final chance to review before it gets deleted. There are times when I get really busy and don't review my spam the same day as I receive it. Seven days is the program default. Like you, I have SM set to empty all Trash folders on exit, which immediately precludes review. It also gives me a way, by monitoring the counts, to see whether I'm getting more or less spam than usual. When my ISP changes its spam filters, I often notice a dramatic change; recently they started labeling all kinds of innocuous messages as ***SPAM***, and I was having to fish them all out of the Junk folder until I changed the settings at the server. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: inserting all e-mail addresses
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mark Hansen wrote: On 4/8/2010 4:18 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: My ISP is stickler for not been labeled as friendly to spam. Do I get spam. I have one mailbox that I use strictly to catch spam. and even on my good address I still get about 20 pieces of Spam a day. once every week on both account I go into web mail and throw out about 50 on my good account and about 300 pieces in my throw away account. Your ISP not allowing you to send spam is in no way related to the amount of spam you receive (except that it may reduce spam you might have received from other members of your ISP). I wish there was a signal you could push that would send a signal to the originating server that would literally either wipe the drive out so it would not even be able to be reformatted. or would blow the equipment completely up. That's simply ridiculous. I didn't say it was possible or even practical. I'd just like to see some severe consequences for people considering creating spam or even gathering list to feed to spammer. Its bad enough I have to put up with legitimate advertising. But when I get junk I don't want under any circumstances it make you want to punch their lights out. When I think of all the resources wasted carrying and storing and delivering their crap, driving costs up for everyone, I get pretty peeved myself. But in the ordinary course of life, I mostly don't see it because it either gets filtered by my ISP or it gets filtered by the JMC in SeaMonkey. I have it set to delete Junk messages after seven days, and that folder contains 43 messages at the moment -- about six a day from seven different accounts. No big deal with a broadband connection. I seem to remember reading about some hacker getting serious prison time recently; those are the people who really should be punished. That stuff, and malware and 419 scams, that's what really should be crushed. Maybe they should spend 20 years reinstalling software after HDD reformats... You know I've been receiving email since sometime in the early 90's starting with local dial-up bulletin boards then the big 3 of Prodigy, CompuServe and AOL then on to ATT Worldnet as dial-up and for a short time through ISP my cable supplier has and now fully through the cable ISP and except for a modeling amount with AOL never really had a spam problem. Two years into using the cable ISP and being fairly spam free the ISP decided to install antispam software I believe it was Barracuda or something similarly named and wouldn't you know it the very first day they had it installed I got 15 to 20 spam emails through the server but they were all marked Possible Spam by the software that was supposed to be stopping it. I tried using the unsubscribe link located at the bottom of this spam but that seemed to generate even more so I just started deleting them as I got them and up until I had to register with a couple of driver downloading sites had become almost spam free. I've always wondered if most of the spam and/or viruses aren't written by the companies also writing the software to get rid of them, similar to the companies that makes the radar detectors people use to keep from getting a speeding ticket are the exact companies that make the radar guns the police use to give you the ticket with therefore creating their own need for being in business. -- Big Bill ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: new computer
u...@domain.invalid wrote: Pat Connors wrote: Please direct me on which files I need to copy and where to find them on my old computer. Plus, do I download the new version of Seamonkey on the new computer and then add the files from my old computer? Thanks for the help. Just get mozbackup, use it to backup your profile, and then use it to load the profile on the new machine. A lot simpler than mucking around with copying folders etc. http://mozbackup.jasnapaka.com/ But, you have to know that if you take the SM1 profile from an XP machine and you transfer to a Vista machine, location of profile are different ... i don't know if mozbackup permit the load at *another* place. Comparing with the copy-methode, you need to mucking around :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: new computer
u...@domain.invalid wrote: Pat Connors wrote: Please direct me on which files I need to copy and where to find them on my old computer. Plus, do I download the new version of Seamonkey on the new computer and then add the files from my old computer? Thanks for the help. Just get mozbackup, use it to backup your profile, and then use it to load the profile on the new machine. A lot simpler than mucking around with copying folders etc. http://mozbackup.jasnapaka.com/ I agree with Pat. Been using mozbackup for years and it's always worked seamlessly. It's EASY! That's what I like about it (smile). It will definitely save from 1.1.15 and reload into 2.1.4 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
2.0.4 version
I want to use the Goggle add on but when I tried to add it, I got a message that it is not compatible with 2.0.4. Does anyone know where I can get the Goggle add on that is compatible? -- Pat Connors, Sacramento CA http://www.connorsgenealogy.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
