Re: Modern Theme in 2.6.1

[Sailfish]

My bloviated meandering follows what Ed Mullen graced us with on 
12/26/2011 6:45 PM:

On my Win 7 machine SM 2.6.1 is using the Modern Theme.

On my XP laptop 2.6.1 is using the Modern Theme.

On my wife's XP system SM 2.6.1 tells me the Modern Theme is 
incompatible with 2.6.1.


Huh?

The install.rdf files in the modern xpi are identical.

Is it able to be removed via the Add-ons screen? If so, it may have some 
how been manually installed from the previous version 2.6.0. You could 
try removing it and restarting to see if the intrinsic 2.6.1 theme is 
there afterward.


--
Sailfish - Netscape Champion
Mozilla Contributor Member - www.mozilla.org/credits/
Netscape/Mozilla Tips: http://www.ufaq.org/ , http://ilias.ca/
Rare Mozilla Stuff: https://www.projectit.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Which of these security flaws are present in SM 2.6.1

[Rostyslaw Lewyckyj]

In their 12/22/2011 security bulletin,
@RISK: The Consensus Security Vulnerability Alert Week 52 2011
SANS reports the following vulnerabilities in Mozilla FF & TB releases.
Since SM code is so closely related to the Moz. FF & TB codes,
which, if any, of these vulnerabilities are present in SM 2.6.1
and when are they due to be removed?

*

(3) HIGH: Mozilla Firefox Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
Affected: Firefox 8.x

Description: Mozilla has released patches for multiple security
vulnerabilities affecting its Firefox web browser. The vulnerabilities
include unspecified memory corruptions, an unspecified crash caused by
faulty regular expression handling in the YARR library, and a memory
corruption vulnerability within Mozilla's SVG implementation that can
be triggered within the DOMAttrModified event handle. It is likely that
some of these vulnerabilities could be exploited in order to execute
code on a target's machine. To do so, an attacker would have to entice
a target to view a malicious web page.

Status: vendor confirmed, updates available

References:
Vendor Site
http://www.mozilla.org
Mozilla Firefox Security Bulletins
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2011/mfsa2011-53.html
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2011/mfsa2011-54.html
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2011/mfsa2011-55.html
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2011/mfsa2011-56.html
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2011/mfsa2011-57.html
http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2011/mfsa2011-58.html
SecurityFocus BugTraq ID
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51138
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51133
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51134
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51135
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51136
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51137

*
- -- 
Rostyk

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Modern Theme in 2.6.1

[Ed Mullen]

On my Win 7 machine SM 2.6.1 is using the Modern Theme.

On my XP laptop 2.6.1 is using the Modern Theme.

On my wife's XP system SM 2.6.1 tells me the Modern Theme is 
incompatible with 2.6.1.


Huh?

The install.rdf files in the modern xpi are identical.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Confidence is the feeling you have before you really understand the problem.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Problem with opening a Web page.

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Frog wrote:

I am attempting to open a web page at the following address:

http://www.nps.gov/features/yell/live/live4.htm

I can get to a window where the picture should be visible--all I see
 there, however, it a black screen where the picture should be. ...


..and I get the same failure with four different browsers:  SeaMonkey, 
Firefox, Chromium, and Opera. Looks like the webcam is down.


--
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Problem with opening a Web page.

[JeffM]

Frog wrote:
>I am attempting to open a web page at the following address:
>http://www.nps.gov/features/yell/live/live4.htm
>
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/search?group=mozilla.support.seamonkey&q=nps+gov&qt_g=Search+this+group
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey 2.6.1 Release -- New Features and Fixes

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.6.1: The new major 
release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! 
Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox release, it 
delivers the latest developments in web technologies such as HTML5, 
hardware acceleration and improved JavaScript speed.


SeaMonkey 2.6.1 is available in 24 languages, for Windows, Mac OS X and 
Linux.


NOTE: This release will only be offered via manual "Check For Updates" 
or our website until sometime shortly after the Christmas Holiday. We 
acknowledge how hectic this time of year is, and do not wish to disturb 
you with updates until you are ready!


Most notably, this release features for the first time:

Added support for the HTML5 "context menu" feature (contextmenu 
attribute)

Print Preview is now available in Composer
About SeaMonkey (about:) shows the update channel now
Added Type Inference, significantly improving JavaScript performance
Added support for querying Do Not Track status via JavaScript
Added support for font-stretch
Improved support for text-overflow
Improved standards support for HTML5, MathML, and CSS
Fixed several stability issues

For a more complete list of major changes in SeaMonkey 2.6.1, see the 
What's New in SeaMonkey 2.6.1 section of the Release Notes, which also 
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked 
questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project (and 
screen shots!), visit www.seamonkey-project.org.


Full news article:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2011-12-22

Downloads for all available platforms and languages:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/

Release notes:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.6.1

System Requirements:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/system-requirements
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

NoOp wrote:

On 12/26/2011 02:04 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:

NoOp wrote:

On 12/26/2011 11:35 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:

Dick Hoffman wrote:

Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced on
this group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I
missed the announcement for it and can't find anything by searching this
newsgroup. I just noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows 2.6.1
available; must have happened fairly recently.
Dick

Could somebody please answer my original question?
Dick


Given that you are using SeaMonkey to post here via NNTP:
   Search Subject or Address - enter 2.6.1
and let us know what you find. After all that's what I'd do to answer
your question.


Which is what I did and found nothing announcing the availability of SM
2.6.1. hence my original post.
Dick


Hence, you found your answer. Nope, it wasn't announced here or on the
dev group, only on RSS.





For the record, I found my problem with my attempt at announcing 2.6.1

I did an "Edit as new" for an old announcement, that included all the 
proper newsgroups, however I also sent it from an account that is only 
e-mail :/


And my SeaMonkey for some reason didn't warn me of that (I recall it 
used to)...


I'll have to investigate in the future to try and figure out why it 
didn't warn and get a bug on file, if one already isn't present. Eitehr 
way, I'm re-sending in a short time from now.


--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey 2.7 Beta 1 Release -- New Features and Fixes

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.7 Beta 1: The new 
major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download 
now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as the newest Firefox 
release, it delivers the latest developments in web technologies.


SeaMonkey 2.7 Beta 1 is available in 24 languages, for Windows, Mac OS X 
and Linux.


Most notably, this release series features for the first time:

Add-ons are compatible by default now, provided they are declared 
compatible with SeaMonkey version 2.1 or better.

Anti-Aliasing for WebGL is now implemented
CSS3 3D-Transforms are now supported
New  element for bi-directional text isolation, along with 
supporting CSS properties

Added IndexedDB APIs to more closely match the specification.
Fixed several stability issues

For a more complete list of major changes in SeaMonkey 2.7, see the 
What's New in SeaMonkey 2.7 section of the Release Notes, which also 
contain a list of known issues and answers to frequently asked 
questions. For a more general overview of the SeaMonkey project, visit 
www.seamonkey-project.org.


Full news article:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/news#2011-12-24

Downloads for all available platforms and languages:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/

Release notes:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.7

System Requirements:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/system-requirements
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 ?

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Mr. Callek you did write that 2.6.1 was a "Chemspill" release caused by
something related to the Macintosh system.
So is the current version 2.6.1 as it now exists 'unannounced' frozen
in content? I.e. If someone gets it now it will be bitwise identical
to what one will get after you announce it officially a few weeks from now?


yes.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Problem with opening a Web page.

[Frog]

NoOp wrote:

On 12/26/2011 01:21 PM, Frog wrote:

I am attempting to open a web page at the following address:

http://www.nps.gov/features/yell/live/live4.htm

I can get to a window where the picture should be visible--all I see
there, however, it a black screen where the picture should be.  I know
that Adobe Flash Player 11 is required to open this page.  I think I
have the required software loaded on my system...at least it appears in
the Add/Remove listing.  I don't know what I must do to make it open
this page properly.  Help!

Windows-XP/SP3 and the latest version of SeaMonkey are loaded on my system.

...
Doesn't work.

Try the alternate:

   
that one works.




Thanks for the information.

The second recommended web site (i.e.: 

takes me to the screen I once found at the web address included in my 
first message.  It seems like attempts are being made by the NPS to make 
this web page better.  Thanks for your help,


Frog
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Problem with opening a Web page.

[NoOp]

On 12/26/2011 01:21 PM, Frog wrote:
> I am attempting to open a web page at the following address:
> 
> http://www.nps.gov/features/yell/live/live4.htm
> 
> I can get to a window where the picture should be visible--all I see 
> there, however, it a black screen where the picture should be.  I know 
> that Adobe Flash Player 11 is required to open this page.  I think I 
> have the required software loaded on my system...at least it appears in 
> the Add/Remove listing.  I don't know what I must do to make it open 
> this page properly.  Help!
> 
> Windows-XP/SP3 and the latest version of SeaMonkey are loaded on my system.
...
Doesn't work.

Try the alternate:

  
that one works.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[NoOp]

On 12/26/2011 02:04 PM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 12/26/2011 11:35 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
>>> Dick Hoffman wrote:
 Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced on
 this group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I
 missed the announcement for it and can't find anything by searching this
 newsgroup. I just noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows 2.6.1
 available; must have happened fairly recently.
 Dick
>>> Could somebody please answer my original question?
>>> Dick
>>
>> Given that you are using SeaMonkey to post here via NNTP:
>>   Search Subject or Address - enter 2.6.1
>> and let us know what you find. After all that's what I'd do to answer
>> your question.
>>
> Which is what I did and found nothing announcing the availability of SM 
> 2.6.1. hence my original post.
> Dick

Hence, you found your answer. Nope, it wasn't announced here or on the
dev group, only on RSS.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Problem with opening a Web page.

[Frog]

David E. Ross wrote:

On 12/26/11 1:21 PM, Frog wrote:

I am attempting to open a web page at the following address:

http://www.nps.gov/features/yell/live/live4.htm

I can get to a window where the picture should be visible--all I see
there, however, it a black screen where the picture should be.  I know
that Adobe Flash Player 11 is required to open this page.  I think I
have the required software loaded on my system...at least it appears in
the Add/Remove listing.  I don't know what I must do to make it open
this page properly.  Help!

Windows-XP/SP3 and the latest version of SeaMonkey are loaded on my system.

Thanks for any help sent my way.

Frog




I get the same problem, even when spoofing Firefox without any mention
of SeaMonkey in my user agent string.  I have Flash 11.1r102.



Thank for you response David.

This window open without any problems prior to the last several versions 
of SeaMonkey.  I was thinking that some setting on my system had changed 
to cause this problem.


Frog
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Problem with opening a Web page.

[David E. Ross]

On 12/26/11 1:21 PM, Frog wrote:
> I am attempting to open a web page at the following address:
> 
> http://www.nps.gov/features/yell/live/live4.htm
> 
> I can get to a window where the picture should be visible--all I see 
> there, however, it a black screen where the picture should be.  I know 
> that Adobe Flash Player 11 is required to open this page.  I think I 
> have the required software loaded on my system...at least it appears in 
> the Add/Remove listing.  I don't know what I must do to make it open 
> this page properly.  Help!
> 
> Windows-XP/SP3 and the latest version of SeaMonkey are loaded on my system.
> 
> Thanks for any help sent my way.
> 
> Frog
> 
> 

I get the same problem, even when spoofing Firefox without any mention
of SeaMonkey in my user agent string.  I have Flash 11.1r102.

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 ?

[Rostyslaw Lewyckyj]

Mr. Callek you did write that 2.6.1 was a "Chemspill" release caused by 
something related to the Macintosh system.

So is the current version 2.6.1 as it now exists 'unannounced' frozen
in content? I.e. If someone gets it now it will be bitwise identical
to what one will get after you announce it officially a few weeks from now?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[km]

Philip TAYLOR wrote:



Justin Wood (Calek-dude) wrote:


Well it also matters to know that Firefox did the same mechanical
difference, due to their ends resources around the holiday, incase
there is an issue that would be deemed critical to users (necessary of
a chemspill) when they are unable to have the manpower to fix it fast
enough.

Having less users have the update makes it less time-critical, and
less 'really weird' interactions with the core product.

I will be turning it back on within the next few days, and this
holiday coupled with Firefox's choice here is why I chose to do it. I
acknowledge that not everyone approves of the choice, but I felt it
the lesser of two evils. (the other evil being exposing all SeaMonkey
users to a potential major issue that Firefox is either not yet aware
of or not yet able to address as fast).


Fair enough. I have commented before on my view of
the Firefox "Frequent release" schedule, and reiterating
that point here, relevant though it clearly is, would
almost certainly accomplish nothing.

Philip Taylor



--
… don't try and feel the pain.
That's impossible. Just try
and free ur mind. then you will
realize the truth. … there is no pain.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[Dick Hoffman]

NoOp wrote:

On 12/26/2011 11:35 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:

Dick Hoffman wrote:

Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced on
this group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I
missed the announcement for it and can't find anything by searching this
newsgroup. I just noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows 2.6.1
available; must have happened fairly recently.
Dick

Could somebody please answer my original question?
Dick


Given that you are using SeaMonkey to post here via NNTP:
  Search Subject or Address - enter 2.6.1
and let us know what you find. After all that's what I'd do to answer
your question.

Which is what I did and found nothing announcing the availability of SM 
2.6.1. hence my original post.

Dick
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: NEW problem ...

[km]

NoOp wrote:

On 12/12/2011 12:49 PM, km wrote:

km wrote:

Stan wrote:

km wrote:

... i am badly visually impair. i know: [VIEW] Zoom etc.
but this must be done manually for EVERY read. is there a way
to preset my zoom???

km

Did you try Start/Settings/Control Panel/Ease of Access/Make the
Computer Easier to See. You can adjust font sizes. And Turn on Magnifier.

... I SHOULD BEEN MORE PACIFIC. I M ZOOM THE TEXT A MAIL MESSAGE so like
if i open a message it automatically opens in large print.




You can modify the userChrome.css file to make the fonts larger by
adding the following to the file.:

}

/* Make the thread and folder panes readable. */
treechildren {
   font-size: 14px !important;
}

  * Some possible accessibility enhancements:
  */
/*
  * Make all the default font sizes 20 pt:
  *
  {
   font-size: 20pt !important
}
  */
/*
  * Make menu items in particular 15 pt instead of the default size:
  *
menupopup>  * {
font-size: 15pt !important
}
  */

and of course you can change those font sizes to whatever you wish. More
info here:

http://www-archive.mozilla.org/unix/customizing.html

Also, you should subscribe to the accessibility newsgroup:
mozilla.support.accessibility
... i am scared to do this as it my screww up the rest. is thera 
download/patch???


km

--
… don't try and feel the pain.
That's impossible. Just try
and free ur mind. then you will
realize the truth. … there is no pain.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: NEW problem ...

[km]

NoOp wrote:

On 12/12/2011 12:49 PM, km wrote:

km wrote:

Stan wrote:

km wrote:

... i am badly visually impair. i know: [VIEW] Zoom etc.
but this must be done manually for EVERY read. is there a way
to preset my zoom???

km

Did you try Start/Settings/Control Panel/Ease of Access/Make the
Computer Easier to See. You can adjust font sizes. And Turn on Magnifier.

... I SHOULD BEEN MORE PACIFIC. I M ZOOM THE TEXT A MAIL MESSAGE so like
if i open a message it automatically opens in large print.




You can modify the userChrome.css file to make the fonts larger by
adding the following to the file.:

}

/* Make the thread and folder panes readable. */
treechildren {
   font-size: 14px !important;
}

  * Some possible accessibility enhancements:
  */
/*
  * Make all the default font sizes 20 pt:
  *
  {
   font-size: 20pt !important
}
  */
/*
  * Make menu items in particular 15 pt instead of the default size:
  *
menupopup>  * {
font-size: 15pt !important
}
  */

and of course you can change those font sizes to whatever you wish. More
info here:

http://www-archive.mozilla.org/unix/customizing.html

Also, you should subscribe to the accessibility newsgroup:
mozilla.support.accessibility
... i am scared to do this as it my screww up the rest. is thera 
download/patch???


km

--
… don't try and feel the pain.
That's impossible. Just try
and free ur mind. then you will
realize the truth. … there is no pain.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: NEW problem ...

[km]

NoOp wrote:

On 12/12/2011 12:49 PM, km wrote:

km wrote:

Stan wrote:

km wrote:

... i am badly visually impair. i know: [VIEW] Zoom etc.
but this must be done manually for EVERY read. is there a way
to preset my zoom???

km

Did you try Start/Settings/Control Panel/Ease of Access/Make the
Computer Easier to See. You can adjust font sizes. And Turn on Magnifier.

... I SHOULD BEEN MORE PACIFIC. I M ZOOM THE TEXT A MAIL MESSAGE so like
if i open a message it automatically opens in large print.




You can modify the userChrome.css file to make the fonts larger by
adding the following to the file.:

}

/* Make the thread and folder panes readable. */
treechildren {
   font-size: 14px !important;
}

  * Some possible accessibility enhancements:
  */
/*
  * Make all the default font sizes 20 pt:
  *
  {
   font-size: 20pt !important
}
  */
/*
  * Make menu items in particular 15 pt instead of the default size:
  *
menupopup>  * {
font-size: 15pt !important
}
  */

and of course you can change those font sizes to whatever you wish. More
info here:

http://www-archive.mozilla.org/unix/customizing.html

Also, you should subscribe to the accessibility newsgroup:
mozilla.support.accessibility
... i am scared to do this as it my screww up the rest. is thera 
download/patch???


km

--
… don't try and feel the pain.
That's impossible. Just try
and free ur mind. then you will
realize the truth. … there is no pain.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Google's let is snow and SeaMonkey

[Paul]

Desiree wrote:
How come Google's "let it snow" doesn't work on SeaMonkey unless I use 
User Agent extension to fake Chrome 18 as the user agent? It works on 
Fx4.01 but not fully like it does on Iron 15.  Seems it should work on 
SM without a need to fake User Agent.  Even with faking the user agent 
on SM it doesn't work fully like on Iron where the snow completely fills 
the screen and I can then write a message with my mouse. On Fx 4 and SM 
2.5, the snow doesn't ever full fill the screen. It has trouble covering 
the images fully. Maybe it works right on the latest SM version which I 
haven't installed because User Agent extension won't work on it.


It works great on my SM 1119.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Problem with opening a Web page.

[Frog]

I am attempting to open a web page at the following address:

http://www.nps.gov/features/yell/live/live4.htm

I can get to a window where the picture should be visible--all I see 
there, however, it a black screen where the picture should be.  I know 
that Adobe Flash Player 11 is required to open this page.  I think I 
have the required software loaded on my system...at least it appears in 
the Add/Remove listing.  I don't know what I must do to make it open 
this page properly.  Help!


Windows-XP/SP3 and the latest version of SeaMonkey are loaded on my system.

Thanks for any help sent my way.

Frog


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[Ray_Net]

Dick Hoffman wrote:
Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced 
on this group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I 
missed the announcement for it and can't find anything by searching 
this newsgroup. I just noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows 
2.6.1 available; must have happened fairly recently.

Dick
I know that a new version is available, because my home page for SM is: 
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/start/

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[NoOp]

On 12/26/2011 11:09 AM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
...
> 
> ...I did send the announce, I'll look into why its not showing (even for 
> me) in this NG right now...
> 

You only sent the RSS annoucement:
 Date: 12/22/2011 12:00 PM +
> As part of Mozilla's ongoing stability and security update process,
> SeaMonkey 2.6.1 is now available for Windows, Mac, and Linux as a
> free download from www.seamonkey-project.org.
> 
> We strongly recommend that all SeaMonkey users upgrade to this latest
> release.
> 
> For a list of changes and more information, please review the
> SeaMonkey 2.6.1 Release Notes.

You didn't sent to this group or the dev group.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[NoOp]

On 12/26/2011 11:35 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
> Dick Hoffman wrote:
>> Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced on
>> this group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I
>> missed the announcement for it and can't find anything by searching this
>> newsgroup. I just noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows 2.6.1
>> available; must have happened fairly recently.
>> Dick
> Could somebody please answer my original question?
> Dick

Given that you are using SeaMonkey to post here via NNTP:
 Search Subject or Address - enter 2.6.1
and let us know what you find. After all that's what I'd do to answer
your question.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[Dick Hoffman]

Dick Hoffman wrote:

Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced on
this group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I
missed the announcement for it and can't find anything by searching this
newsgroup. I just noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows 2.6.1
available; must have happened fairly recently.
Dick

Could somebody please answer my original question?
Dick
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[Philip TAYLOR]

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:


Well it also matters to know that Firefox did the same mechanical difference, 
due to their ends resources around the holiday, incase there is an issue that 
would be deemed critical to users (necessary of a chemspill) when they are 
unable to have the manpower to fix it fast enough.

Having less users have the update makes it less time-critical, and less 'really 
weird' interactions with the core product.

I will be turning it back on within the next few days, and this holiday coupled 
with Firefox's choice here is why I chose to do it. I acknowledge that not 
everyone approves of the choice, but I felt it the lesser of two evils. (the 
other evil being exposing all SeaMonkey users to a potential major issue that 
Firefox is either not yet aware of or not yet able to address as fast).


Fair enough.  I have commented before on my view of
the Firefox "Frequent release" schedule, and reiterating
that point here, relevant though it clearly is, would
almost certainly accomplish nothing.

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[David E. Ross]

On 12/26/11 10:34 AM, Dick Hoffman wrote:
> Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced on 
> this group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I 
> missed the announcement for it and can't find anything by searching this 
> newsgroup. I just noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows 2.6.1 
> available; must have happened fairly recently.
> Dick

It is cited as the current version at .

-- 

David E. Ross
.

Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive
bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation.
© 1997 by David E. Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Which version is best to update to ?

[NoOp]

On 12/26/2011 02:48 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 21:20:10 -0800, DoctorBill wrote:
> 
>> OMG - I was wrong !  It is up to 2.6.1 !
>> What does it do - sing and dance for you ?
>> Seriously - it probably does !
> 
> Unfortunately, we are still missing about:kitchensink .
> 
> Phil (to make up for this we have about:life)
> 

42

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[Philip TAYLOR]

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:


Philip TAYLOR wrote:



Despite frequent rumours over several days on this group of the existence
of Seamonkey 2.6 and 2.6.1, my Seamonkey gives me no indication
whatsoever that it has identified a more recent version suitable
for download.


Expected for now, 2.6/2.6.1 were only available via MANUAL check for updates or the 
website. "Surprising" users with an update during this busy holiday season when 
they did nothing other than running the browser was determined too disruptive at present.


With respect, I think that decision was flawed.
User have the option, via :

Edit/Prerences/Advanced/Software installation/Seamonkey/Automatically check for 
updates/Automatically download and install the update

to specifically indicate whether or not they are prepared to
be "[surprised] with an update during this busy holiday season
when they did nothing other than running the browser".  I indicated
that I was not, but still wanted to be automatically informed that
the update is available.  To offer users this degree of granularity,
and then to unilaterally trump it because the powers that be did
not want to "[surprise] users with an update [...] when they did
nothing other than running the browser" makes a mockery of the
granularity offered.

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: cacheing encrypted pages

[NoOp]

On 12/24/2011 01:08 PM, Not@home wrote:
> I'm using SM 2.5.
> 
> As I logged out of a site, I noticed that they advised that users 
> configure their browsers to not cache encrypted pages.  I went into 
> preferences and tried to find that option, but failed.  I do have it set 
> to erase my cache when I close the program.  Will that serve the same 
> purpose?

Ralph's answer with disable the ssl cache permanently. However, if you
simply want to clear the cach after visiting a site (bank account for
example), switch to a browser window and select Tools|Clear Private
Data|ensure that 'Cache' is checked & click on 'Clear Private Data now'.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[Justin Wood (Callek)]

Philip TAYLOR wrote:



Dick Hoffman wrote:

Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced
on this group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I
missed the announcement for it and can't find anything by searching
this newsgroup. I just noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows
2.6.1 available; must have happened fairly recently.


I have Seamonkey 2.5 (Win/XP Pro; SP3).
I have Edit/Prerences/Advanced/Software
installation/Seamonkey/Automatically check for updates/Daily checked.

Despite frequent rumours over several days on this group of the existence
of Seamonkey 2.6 and 2.6.1, my Seamonkey gives me no indication
whatsoever that it has identified a more recent version suitable
for download.


Expected for now, 2.6/2.6.1 were only available via MANUAL check for 
updates or the website. "Surprising" users with an update during this 
busy holiday season when they did nothing other than running the browser 
was determined too disruptive at present.


We'll ship it to the background update within the next week or two. In 
the mean time a "Help->Check for updates" will get you the new one if 
you want it sooner.


...I did send the announce, I'll look into why its not showing (even for 
me) in this NG right now...


--
~Justin Wood (Callek)

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[Philip TAYLOR]

Dick Hoffman wrote:

Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced on this 
group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I missed the 
announcement for it and can't find anything by searching this newsgroup. I just 
noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows 2.6.1 available; must have 
happened fairly recently.


I have Seamonkey 2.5 (Win/XP Pro; SP3).
I have Edit/Prerences/Advanced/Software installation/Seamonkey/Automatically 
check for updates/Daily checked.

Despite frequent rumours over several days on this group of the existence
of Seamonkey 2.6 and 2.6.1, my Seamonkey gives me no indication
whatsoever that it has identified a more recent version suitable
for download.

Philip Taylor
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey 2.6.1 availability

[Dick Hoffman]

Was SM 2.6.1 availability for general release ever formally announced on 
this group? It's being recommended as the latest and greatest but I 
missed the announcement for it and can't find anything by searching this 
newsgroup. I just noticed that HELP>SEARCH FOR UPDATES now shows 2.6.1 
available; must have happened fairly recently.

Dick
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Tabbed Mail

[Jay Garcia]

On 26.12.2011 11:20, BIll Spikowski wrote:

 --- Original Message ---

> Recent releases of Seamonkey include a tabbed mail feature.
> 
> On my home computer, this function is enabled, but I don't want it. On my
> office computer, it's not enabled, and I want it!
> 
> I know how to turn "tabbed browsing" on and off -- but what about tabbed mail?

Tab behavior in mail is governed in the browser settings AFAIK.

Edit => Preferences => Browswer => Tabbed Browsing => Check the first
box to hide the tab bar if only one tab is open.

-- 
Jay Garcia - www.ufaq.org - Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Thunderbird
Mozilla Contribute Coordinator Team - www.mozilla.org/contribute/
Mozilla Mozillian Member - www.mozillians.org
Mozilla Contributor Member - www.mozilla.org/credits/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Which version is best to update to ?

[DoctorBill]

Daniel wrote:

DoctorBill wrote:

DoctorBill wrote:

I'm in Version 2.0 now - I had to reluctantly abandon 1.1 for 2.0 and
now there is a 2.4

I had it start to update to 2.4 but worry that all will get screwed up.

Would like to download it myself and then install it myself.

Where (subdirectory) was the automatic update going to download into ?
Would it have overwritten the 2.0 ?

I don't trust "Automatic" stuff anymore.

So - my question is - should I go for 2.4 or is a lower numbered version
better - i.e less bugs right now ?

DoctorBill


OMG - I was wrong ! It is up to 2.6.1 !

What does it do - sing and dance for you ?

Seriously - it probably does !

DoctorBill


Doctor Bill a couple of days ago, Cliff was asking about upgrading from
V 2.0.14, so I posted the following...

Cliff, I think there was a change in the way SM did things in version
2.1, so, if I were you, I'd update from your current V 2.0.14 to V 2.1
and then update from V 2.1 to V 2.4.1 or even to the just released V 2,6,1.

Install 2.1 into a different location to your current version, and it
will create a copy of your profile, then you can install V 2.4.1 (or
2.6.1) over the top of this V 2.x.1 (and then you can uninstall your V
2.0.14, but keep the profile - always good to have a back-up).

Report back here if you have any problems.

Let us know how you go DoctorBill.


AlrightI have 2.1, 2.4 and 2.6 downloaded on my memory stick.

I know where 1.1's profile files are - everything I want to keep is 
there.  I backed it up to a memory stick.


Are ALL the versions of SeaMonkey going to be installed on
C:\Documents and Settings\DoctorBill\Application 
Data\Mozilla\Seamonkey\Profiles ?


I would like to be able to find them ALL (1.1, 2.0, 2.1, then 2.4 and 
2.6) when the Feces hits the fan (as it were and if it does).


I realize that to all you expurts this probably seems silly and 
unnecessary, but I have been thru a lot of confusion and wasted time 
over the years when upgrading to new versions of software.


So I am very leery of changing versions !
I especially LOVE changing versions of Windows !

DocotBill
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Tabbed Mail

[BIll Spikowski]

Recent releases of Seamonkey include a tabbed mail feature.

On my home computer, this function is enabled, but I don't want it. On my
office computer, it's not enabled, and I want it!

I know how to turn "tabbed browsing" on and off -- but what about tabbed mail?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Which version is best to update to ?

[DoctorBill]

Ed Mullen wrote:

Philip Chee wrote:

On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 21:20:10 -0800, DoctorBill wrote:


OMG - I was wrong ! It is up to 2.6.1 !
What does it do - sing and dance for you ?
Seriously - it probably does !


Unfortunately, we are still missing about:kitchensink .


But ...

http://www-archive.mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/samples/kitchensink.xml



Phil (to make up for this we have about:life)



Thanks, Philip. Very strange!



Is that my system going down the drain ! ?

DoctorBill

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Which version is best to update to ?

[Ed Mullen]

Philip Chee wrote:

On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 21:20:10 -0800, DoctorBill wrote:


OMG - I was wrong !  It is up to 2.6.1 !
What does it do - sing and dance for you ?
Seriously - it probably does !


Unfortunately, we are still missing about:kitchensink .


But ...

http://www-archive.mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/samples/kitchensink.xml



Phil (to make up for this we have about:life)



Thanks, Philip.  Very strange!

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Google's let is snow and SeaMonkey

[Jay Garcia]

On 26.12.2011 08:47, Philip TAYLOR wrote:

 --- Original Message ---

> 
> 
> Jay Garcia wrote:
> 
>> Works here in FF 9.0.1 without any additional preference settings.
> 
> And the relevance of this statement to a Seamonkey-specific forum is ?
> Note spirit of Christmas goodwill, as promulgated by Ebenezer Scrooge !

The relevance is that in any support forum, it may be considered
beneficial that the indication that things work and/or don't work based
on the same code foundation, etc.

FF 9.0.1: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/9.0.1

SM 2.6.1: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20111221
Firefox/9.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.6.1

Note: rv:9.0.1 in both UA

This discussion may now be considered OT, so we can continue this in
m.genral

Follup set to mozilla.general


-- 
Jay Garcia - www.ufaq.org - Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Thunderbird
Mozilla Contribute Coordinator Team - www.mozilla.org/contribute/
Mozilla Mozillian Member - www.mozillians.org
Mozilla Contributor Member - www.mozilla.org/credits/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Google's let is snow and SeaMonkey

[Philip TAYLOR]

Jay Garcia wrote:


Works here in FF 9.0.1 without any additional preference settings.


And the relevance of this statement to a Seamonkey-specific forum is ?
Note spirit of Christmas goodwill, as promulgated by Ebenezer Scrooge !
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Google's let is snow and SeaMonkey

[Jay Garcia]

On 26.12.2011 04:51, Philip Chee wrote:

 --- Original Message ---

> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:08:14 -1000, Desiree wrote:
>> How come Google's "let it snow" doesn't work on SeaMonkey unless I use User 
>> Agent extension to fake Chrome 18 as the user 
>> agent? It works on Fx4.01 but not fully like it does on Iron 15.  Seems it 
>> should work on SM without a need to fake User 
>> Agent.  Even with faking the user agent on SM it doesn't work fully like on 
>> Iron where the snow completely fills the screen 
>> and I can then write a message with my mouse. On Fx 4 and SM 2.5, the snow 
>> doesn't ever full fill the screen. It has trouble 
>> covering the images fully. Maybe it works right on the latest SM version 
>> which I haven't installed because User Agent 
>> extension won't work on it.
> 
> Edit-> Preferences -> Advanced -> HTTP Networking ->
> [X] Advertise Firefox Compatibility
> 
> WORKSFORME.
> 
> Phil
> 

Works here in FF 9.0.1 without any additional preference settings.

-- 
Jay Garcia - www.ufaq.org - Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Thunderbird
Mozilla Contribute Coordinator Team - www.mozilla.org/contribute/
Mozilla Mozillian Member - www.mozillians.org
Mozilla Contributor Member - www.mozilla.org/credits/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Google's let is snow and SeaMonkey

[No]

Desiree wrote:

How come Google's "let it snow" doesn't work on SeaMonkey unless I use
User Agent extension to fake Chrome 18 as the user agent? It works on
Fx4.01 but not fully like it does on Iron 15. Seems it should work on SM
without a need to fake User Agent. Even with faking the user agent on SM
it doesn't work fully like on Iron where the snow completely fills the
screen and I can then write a message with my mouse. On Fx 4 and SM 2.5,
the snow doesn't ever full fill the screen. It has trouble covering the
images fully. Maybe it works right on the latest SM version which I
haven't installed because User Agent extension won't work on it.


Works for me on SM 2.6.1
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Google's let is snow and SeaMonkey

[Philip Chee]

On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:08:14 -1000, Desiree wrote:
> How come Google's "let it snow" doesn't work on SeaMonkey unless I use User 
> Agent extension to fake Chrome 18 as the user 
> agent? It works on Fx4.01 but not fully like it does on Iron 15.  Seems it 
> should work on SM without a need to fake User 
> Agent.  Even with faking the user agent on SM it doesn't work fully like on 
> Iron where the snow completely fills the screen 
> and I can then write a message with my mouse. On Fx 4 and SM 2.5, the snow 
> doesn't ever full fill the screen. It has trouble 
> covering the images fully. Maybe it works right on the latest SM version 
> which I haven't installed because User Agent 
> extension won't work on it.

Edit-> Preferences -> Advanced -> HTTP Networking ->
[X] Advertise Firefox Compatibility

WORKSFORME.

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee , 
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Which version is best to update to ?

[Philip Chee]

On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 21:20:10 -0800, DoctorBill wrote:

> OMG - I was wrong !  It is up to 2.6.1 !
> What does it do - sing and dance for you ?
> Seriously - it probably does !

Unfortunately, we are still missing about:kitchensink .

Phil (to make up for this we have about:life)

-- 
Philip Chee , 
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Which version is best to update to ?

[Daniel]

DoctorBill wrote:

DoctorBill wrote:

I'm in Version 2.0 now - I had to reluctantly abandon 1.1 for 2.0 and
now there is a 2.4

I had it start to update to 2.4 but worry that all will get screwed up.

Would like to download it myself and then install it myself.

Where (subdirectory) was the automatic update going to download into ?
Would it have overwritten the 2.0 ?

I don't trust "Automatic" stuff anymore.

So - my question is - should I go for 2.4 or is a lower numbered version
better - i.e less bugs right now ?

DoctorBill


OMG - I was wrong ! It is up to 2.6.1 !

What does it do - sing and dance for you ?

Seriously - it probably does !

DoctorBill


Doctor Bill a couple of days ago, Cliff was asking about upgrading from 
V 2.0.14, so I posted the following...


Cliff, I think there was a change in the way SM did things in version 
2.1, so, if I were you, I'd update from your current V 2.0.14 to V 2.1 
and then update from V 2.1 to V 2.4.1 or even to the just released V 2,6,1.


Install 2.1 into a different location to your current version, and it 
will create a copy of your profile, then you can install V 2.4.1 (or 
2.6.1) over the top of this V 2.x.1 (and then you can uninstall your V 
2.0.14, but keep the profile - always good to have a back-up).


Report back here if you have any problems.

Let us know how you go DoctorBill.
--
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and yours, and may 2012 be 
better than 2011.


Daniel
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Google - blocking unwanted sites?

[JeffM]

Anonymous wrote:
>Why cant SM block unwanted sites from Google searches?
>
This was asked (just as poorly) a while back:
http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey/browse_frm/thread/8555dcbe93416bdb/1480ad93b0eae5a7#doc_1480ad93b0eae5a7
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.5 - pictures not reloaded from cache

[Jochen Roderburg]

On 2011-12-01, Jochen Roderburg  wrote:
> The new SeaMonkey 2.5 (on Linux) shows a strange behaviour on a few websites
> with pictures.

> When I first load such a page, everything is nornmal, the thumbnails are
> shown and when I click on them I get the full picture.
> Now, when I return to the browser tab one or two days later, the thumbnails
> are no longer shown, only empty frames are there and when I click on them I
> get a page with only a text line containing the URL.

FWIW, this strange behaviour has disappeared again in the 2.6 series (betas and
finals). Hope it stays that way.

I am still curious what might have caused this, but don't know how to find
any info, as there seems to be no complete list of changes anywhere.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Which version is best to update to ?

[Ray_Net]

DoctorBill wrote:
I'm in Version 2.0 now - I had to reluctantly abandon 1.1 for 2.0 and 
now there is a 2.4


I had it start to update to 2.4 but worry that all will get screwed up.

Would like to download it myself and then install it myself.

Where (subdirectory) was the automatic update going to download into ?
Would it have overwritten the 2.0 ?

I don't trust "Automatic" stuff anymore.

So - my question is - should I go for 2.4 or is a lower numbered 
version better - i.e less bugs right now ?


DoctorBill

As i have read here, it's best to first go to 2.1 then go to 2.6.1.
Tell me if i am wrong.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Google's let is snow and SeaMonkey

[Desiree]

How come Google's "let it snow" doesn't work on SeaMonkey unless I use User Agent extension to fake Chrome 18 as the user 
agent? It works on Fx4.01 but not fully like it does on Iron 15.  Seems it should work on SM without a need to fake User 
Agent.  Even with faking the user agent on SM it doesn't work fully like on Iron where the snow completely fills the screen 
and I can then write a message with my mouse. On Fx 4 and SM 2.5, the snow doesn't ever full fill the screen. It has trouble 
covering the images fully. Maybe it works right on the latest SM version which I haven't installed because User Agent 
extension won't work on it.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: cacheing encrypted pages

[Ralph Fox]

On Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:08:05 -0500, in message 
news://news.mozilla.org/0sgdnwnunr2momvtnz2dnuvz_hodn...@mozilla.org
Not@home wrote:

> I'm using SM 2.5.
>
> As I logged out of a site, I noticed that they advised that users
> configure their browsers to not cache encrypted pages. I went into
> preferences and tried to find that option, but failed.

That option is in about:config

1.  Type about:config into the Location Bar (address bar) and press Enter.
2.  Scroll down and look for the preference named "browser.cache.disk_cache_ssl"
The values have the following meanings
 •  true  -- Cache to disk content retrieved by SSL.
 •  false -- Don't cache to disk content retrieved by SSL.
3.  Double-click the preference to change the value back and forth between 
true and false


> I do have it set
> to erase my cache when I close the program. Will that serve the same
> purpose?

Yes, for the most part.

-- 
Kind regards
Ralph

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey