Re: address books
On 19/01/14 03:28, Rick Merrill wrote: For years I have been exporting backups of my email address books. Now I need to import them and it is creating duplicates! This is unexpected - must I delete the old folder first??? Rick, seems logical to me!! If you export the addresses in your e-mail addressbook, then import the exported copy back into your addressbook, you will have two of each. Just to be super-safe, why not export your current email addressbook, then delete everything in your addressbook, and then import the old addressbook. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 Build identifier: 20131203183810 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 SeaMonkey/2.22 Build identifier: 20131023190942 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Odd scrolling behavior
Ed Mullen wrote, On 19/01/2014 02:00: Okay, here's a weird one. Someone was perusing one of my Web sites and said, to paraphrase: If I click in the vertical scroll bar below the handle (grippy) the page scrolls down more than one full screen. That is, the vast majority of pages (I've checked many) will scroll so that the bottom of the first page is now at the top. The pages on my site scroll up past that, so that the content of the initial screen is above the top of the page. Meaning that the user will be missing, not see, some content. I cannot give a definitive example since it depends to some extent upon browser window size. But, try it at, for instance: http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_combine.php I only give this page as an example because it requires several scroll-downs to see the entire page. Then try any Amazon.com page. I haven't found one where it happens. Oddly, having checked it in: IE 11 Opera 18 Chrome 32 Safari (Windows) 5 Pale Moon 24 Moz-based SeaMonkey 2 Moz-based Firefox 26 Moz-based only the Moz-based browsers exhibit the problem. I'm posting here first but it may be an HTML or CSS issue. Which I would then pursue in an appropriate Usenet group. I have tested this on a varity of sites online and most do not exhibit this but several do. Any thoughts welcome. I exhibit also the problem - But who's care ? The developers are not interested :-) Same as the bug i encounter here: I am interested to reply ... both groups Seamonkey and Firefox are interested about the follow-up of this thread. BUT because i am not interested to follow the mozilla.support.firefox i did not subscribe to this group. SM refuse that i post to both group :-( So i was obliged to not reply into mozilla.support.firefox :-( And as i said before: who's care ? ... :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: what does X-Mozilla Status mean?
Ralph Fox -rf-nz-@xn--kba.invalid wrote: On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:21:45 -0500, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Rob wrote: Jim no_...@domaininvalid.org wrote: I noticed that all the headers for my email that I send out contain: X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 0080 Those are not actually in the messages that you send out, only in the copies that are in your Sent folder. Actually, both messages contain these fields, with different values. I sent a message from one of my accounts to another, and found: The copy in my Sent folder had: X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 0080 The copy received in the other account had: X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: Of course, I could change the first value for each by toggling read/unread (pressing M). Still, those headers are not sent out. Seamonkey and Thunderbird add the headers to the received copy after downloading it. If you download the same email with a non-Mozilla email program, those headers won't be there. Correct. The headers are only there in messages that are in folders inside Seamonkey and Thunderbird, not in messages sent to the outside or received from the outside. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Odd scrolling behavior
On 1/19/14 6:40 PM +0900, Ray_Net wrote: Ed Mullen wrote, On 19/01/2014 02:00: Okay, here's a weird one. Someone was perusing one of my Web sites and said, to paraphrase: If I click in the vertical scroll bar below the handle (grippy) the page scrolls down more than one full screen. That is, the vast majority of pages (I've checked many) will scroll so that the bottom of the first page is now at the top. The pages on my site scroll up past that, so that the content of the initial screen is above the top of the page. Meaning that the user will be missing, not see, some content. I cannot give a definitive example since it depends to some extent upon browser window size. But, try it at, for instance: http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_combine.php I only give this page as an example because it requires several scroll-downs to see the entire page. Then try any Amazon.com page. I haven't found one where it happens. Oddly, having checked it in: IE 11 Opera 18 Chrome 32 Safari (Windows) 5 Pale Moon 24 Moz-based SeaMonkey 2 Moz-based Firefox 26 Moz-based only the Moz-based browsers exhibit the problem. I'm posting here first but it may be an HTML or CSS issue. Which I would then pursue in an appropriate Usenet group. I have tested this on a varity of sites online and most do not exhibit this but several do. Any thoughts welcome. I exhibit also the problem - But who's care ? The developers are not interested :-) Same as the bug i encounter here: I am interested to reply ... both groups Seamonkey and Firefox are interested about the follow-up of this thread. BUT because i am not interested to follow the mozilla.support.firefox i did not subscribe to this group. SM refuse that i post to both group :-( So i was obliged to not reply into mozilla.support.firefox :-( And as i said before: who's care ? ... :-) Interestingly, I was able to reply to both, even though I'm only subscribed to m.s.s. -- / // Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan // Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Odd scrolling behavior
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:00:14 -0500, Ed Mullen ejobviouslyrem...@edmullen.net wrote: Okay, here's a weird one. Someone was perusing one of my Web sites and said, to paraphrase: If I click in the vertical scroll bar below the handle (grippy) the page scrolls down more than one full screen. That is, the vast majority of pages (I've checked many) will scroll so that the bottom of the first page is now at the top. The pages on my site scroll up past that, so that the content of the initial screen is above the top of the page. Meaning that the user will be missing, not see, some content. I cannot give a definitive example since it depends to some extent upon browser window size. But, try it at, for instance: http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_combine.php I only give this page as an example because it requires several scroll-downs to see the entire page. I seem to be seeing something slightly different to other people. Using Opera 12.x I see the same whether I use the Page Down key or the mouse; I miss seeing some your page because it is hidden by the fixed the image and menu bar. I don't know how it's done but by telling the browser that the top of the scroll bar should be just under the bottom of the menu bar will cure that. Using Firefox there is still text which is hidden by the image and menu bar but the amount by which the page is moved is different depending on whether I use the keyboard or mouse. I see the amount by which a page is moved to be different on all other pages I've looked at; using the mouse moves the page slightly more than using the keyboard. That idiosyncrasy could be considered a bug in Firefox. -- Roger ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Strange IMAP account
I've seen this before, but it's been quite a while. If the problem does not clear up on its own, you can unsubscribe from the duplicated folders. Highlight the account name on the left of the screen, select Manage Folder Subscriptions on the right and that will display all of the IMAP folders. Just un-check the duplicate folder names (the ones with the numbers), click OK and it should take care of it. Hope this helps. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Appcrash issue
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 Realise this is probably something on my PC rather than in internal SM fault, but I'm struggling to find a reason: randomly when *closing* SM, I get a Windows application error popup window. Application Event logs in Windows shows 2 consecutive events, id 1000 and 1001. They show the faulting app is seamonkey.exe, version 26.0.0.5092, and the faulting module is xul.dll, same version. The exception code is c005. SM runs normally, pages render as expected, etc. I usually have both a mail browser window open at the same time, but it doesn't seem to matter whether or not that's true. It's only when closing the browser when this happens. Here's the txt of the Windows Error Reporting event entry (ID 1001): Log Name: Application Source:Windows Error Reporting Date: 19/01/2014 15:55:24 Event ID: 1001 Task Category: None Level: Information Keywords: Classic User: N/A Computer: snipped Description: Fault bucket , type 0 Event Name: APPCRASH Response: Not available Cab Id: 0 Problem signature: P1: seamonkey.exe P2: 26.0.0.5092 P3: 52a7f685 P4: xul.dll P5: 26.0.0.5092 P6: 52a7f5d7 P7: c005 P8: 00cccdb1 P9: P10: I'm also having issues with Adobe Reader on the same PC, but I'm having the same lack of progress trying to diagnose that. Versions X or XI, it makes no difference (tried both, one at a time). They crash within a minute of opening; SM browser crashes when it's closed. Drivers firmware are up date across the board, so I'm getting desperate. All suggestions entertained. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Is anyone here using AdBlock Edge extension?
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/adblock-edge/ ... It is a fork from AdBlock Plus v2.1.2 without the acceptable ads feature. Thank you in advance. :) -- No, I'd prefer a cooler WITHOUT an ant-door, thank you... --unknown /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anyone here using AdBlock Edge extension?
On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:54:47 -0800, Ant wrote: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/adblock-edge/ ... It is a fork from AdBlock Plus v2.1.2 without the acceptable ads feature. Thank you in advance. :) I'll await your answers as I don't see any ads, never mind acceptable one with ad-block plus. -- Jim S Tyneside UK www.jimscott.co.uk ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anyone here using AdBlock Edge extension?
On 01/19/2014 11:54 AM, Ant wrote: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/adblock-edge/ ... It is a fork from AdBlock Plus v2.1.2 without the acceptable ads feature. Thank you in advance. :) If you have a problem with the extension see the support site. [adstomper / adblockedge — Bitbucket](https://bitbucket.org/adstomper/adblockedge/) BTW No crossposting. It is almost never appropriate to send the same message to two mailing lists or newsgroups. Please don't do it. Or, if you must, make sure you set the Followup-To and Reply-To fields to ensure that replies go only to one, not to both. [Mozilla Forum Etiquette](http://www.mozilla.org/about/forums/etiquette.html) Followup-To: mozilla.addons.user-experience ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Odd scrolling behavior
Roger wrote: On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 20:00:14 -0500, Ed Mullen ejobviouslyrem...@edmullen.net wrote: Okay, here's a weird one. Someone was perusing one of my Web sites and said, to paraphrase: If I click in the vertical scroll bar below the handle (grippy) the page scrolls down more than one full screen. That is, the vast majority of pages (I've checked many) will scroll so that the bottom of the first page is now at the top. The pages on my site scroll up past that, so that the content of the initial screen is above the top of the page. Meaning that the user will be missing, not see, some content. I cannot give a definitive example since it depends to some extent upon browser window size. But, try it at, for instance: http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_combine.php I only give this page as an example because it requires several scroll-downs to see the entire page. I seem to be seeing something slightly different to other people. Using Opera 12.x I see the same whether I use the Page Down key or the mouse; I miss seeing some your page because it is hidden by the fixed the image and menu bar. I don't know how it's done but by telling the browser that the top of the scroll bar should be just under the bottom of the menu bar will cure that. Using Firefox there is still text which is hidden by the image and menu bar but the amount by which the page is moved is different depending on whether I use the keyboard or mouse. I see the amount by which a page is moved to be different on all other pages I've looked at; using the mouse moves the page slightly more than using the keyboard. That idiosyncrasy could be considered a bug in Firefox. Regarding my site a little more info would be helpful to me. - What OS and version? - Display size? - Browser window size? I've never seen this behavior on my site in any of the various browsers I mentioned in my original post. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ What would a chair look like if your knees bent the other way. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: secondary font in email composition
jim wrote: Seamonkey 2.9.1 that the email composition font is liable to change from your setting for html messages to variable font mixed (i think that is what it is) is not longer something i beat myself up for as something i am doing since i find out it happens to other people (and even with thunderbird). I found it several years ago and changed it form a serif (times roman or courier or similar) to match my primary arial composition font and size as close as possible and can not 'refind it since i have made a recent change in my html font from large to extra large. cutting to the chase: does anyone know where the setting for the secondary default font for email composition in Seamonkey is? jim Not quite sure what you mean by secondary font, Jim. But, the font settings are in: Edit - Preferences - Appearance - Fonts. -- Ed Mullen http://edmullen.net/ What is a free gift? Aren't all gifts free? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Odd scrolling behavior
I've set followup to mozilla.general as this is more about your site than Firefox. On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:20:23 -0500, Ed Mullen ejobviouslyrem...@edmullen.net wrote: Regarding my site a little more info would be helpful to me. - What OS and version? XP Home - Display size? 1024 x 768 - Browser window size? Browsers run full screen. Approximate viewable areas: Firefox 1009 x 649, Opera 817 x 644. I've never seen this behavior on my site in any of the various browsers I mentioned in my original post. I use only Opera and Firefox. I did start my post by saying that I seem to be seeing things differently to other people! If it matters I don't have either Flash or Java installed. And I run browsers with Javascript off unless I find it essential to turn it on (off when I viewed your page). -- Roger ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Odd scrolling behavior
Trane Francks wrote: On 1/19/14 12:14 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 1/19/14 10:05 AM +0900, Ed Mullen wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Okay, here's a weird one. Someone was perusing one of my Web sites and said, to paraphrase: If I click in the vertical scroll bar below the handle (grippy) the page scrolls down more than one full screen. That is, the vast majority of pages (I've checked many) will scroll so that the bottom of the first page is now at the top. The pages on my site scroll up past that, so that the content of the initial screen is above the top of the page. Meaning that the user will be missing, not see, some content. I cannot give a definitive example since it depends to some extent upon browser window size. But, try it at, for instance: http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_combine.php I only give this page as an example because it requires several scroll-downs to see the entire page. Then try any Amazon.com page. I haven't found one where it happens. Oddly, having checked it in: IE 11 Opera 18 Chrome 32 Safari (Windows) 5 Pale Moon 24 Moz-based SeaMonkey 2 Moz-based Firefox 26 Moz-based only the Moz-based browsers exhibit the problem. I'm posting here first but it may be an HTML or CSS issue. Which I would then pursue in an appropriate Usenet group. I have tested this on a varity of sites online and most do not exhibit this but several do. Any thoughts welcome. One additional thing. John Gilliver, who mentioned this to me origianlly, noted that it only happens when clicking in the scroll bar space. It does NOT happen if using the PAGE DOWN key (in Windows). I confirmed that. Interesting. Yes, I've seen this behaviour before. It appears to me that clicking inside the scroll bar track bases the page-down behaviour on the overall size of the window rather than just the scrolling frame of the site. Pressing the space bar to page-down bases the behaviour on the frame. I'd call this a bug. The scroll slider moves to where I click. I'm not seeing any problem. GW To reproduce the issue, OS X must be configured to Jump to the next page, not Jump to the spot that's clicked. Is that a joke? Ever since my first mouse with a scroll wheel I have never even used the slider, I was just trying to duplicate the OP problem, and his page works fine for me.. GW ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Odd scrolling behavior
Trane Francks wrote, On 19/01/2014 11:45: On 1/19/14 6:40 PM +0900, Ray_Net wrote: Ed Mullen wrote, On 19/01/2014 02:00: Okay, here's a weird one. Someone was perusing one of my Web sites and said, to paraphrase: If I click in the vertical scroll bar below the handle (grippy) the page scrolls down more than one full screen. That is, the vast majority of pages (I've checked many) will scroll so that the bottom of the first page is now at the top. The pages on my site scroll up past that, so that the content of the initial screen is above the top of the page. Meaning that the user will be missing, not see, some content. I cannot give a definitive example since it depends to some extent upon browser window size. But, try it at, for instance: http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_combine.php I only give this page as an example because it requires several scroll-downs to see the entire page. Then try any Amazon.com page. I haven't found one where it happens. Oddly, having checked it in: IE 11 Opera 18 Chrome 32 Safari (Windows) 5 Pale Moon 24 Moz-based SeaMonkey 2 Moz-based Firefox 26 Moz-based only the Moz-based browsers exhibit the problem. I'm posting here first but it may be an HTML or CSS issue. Which I would then pursue in an appropriate Usenet group. I have tested this on a varity of sites online and most do not exhibit this but several do. Any thoughts welcome. I exhibit also the problem - But who's care ? The developers are not interested :-) Same as the bug i encounter here: I am interested to reply ... both groups Seamonkey and Firefox are interested about the follow-up of this thread. BUT because i am not interested to follow the mozilla.support.firefox i did not subscribe to this group. SM refuse that i post to both group :-( So i was obliged to not reply into mozilla.support.firefox :-( And as i said before: who's care ? ... :-) Interestingly, I was able to reply to both, even though I'm only subscribed to m.s.s. Perhaps because you are on SM 2.23 ? (i am stuck on 2.17) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anyone here using AdBlock Edge extension?
Ant wrote: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/adblock-edge/ ... It is a fork from AdBlock Plus v2.1.2 without the acceptable ads feature. Thank you in advance. :) You can always turn off the acceptable ads feature from adblock's settings -- GNOME 3.10.2 openSUSE 13.1 (Bottle) (x86_64) 64-bit Kernel Linux 3.11.6-4-desktop http://www.reddit.com/r/seamonkey/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Odd scrolling behavior
On 1/20/14 5:54 AM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 1/19/14 12:14 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote: Trane Francks wrote: On 1/19/14 10:05 AM +0900, Ed Mullen wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Okay, here's a weird one. Someone was perusing one of my Web sites and said, to paraphrase: If I click in the vertical scroll bar below the handle (grippy) the page scrolls down more than one full screen. That is, the vast majority of pages (I've checked many) will scroll so that the bottom of the first page is now at the top. The pages on my site scroll up past that, so that the content of the initial screen is above the top of the page. Meaning that the user will be missing, not see, some content. I cannot give a definitive example since it depends to some extent upon browser window size. But, try it at, for instance: http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_combine.php I only give this page as an example because it requires several scroll-downs to see the entire page. Then try any Amazon.com page. I haven't found one where it happens. Oddly, having checked it in: IE 11 Opera 18 Chrome 32 Safari (Windows) 5 Pale Moon 24 Moz-based SeaMonkey 2 Moz-based Firefox 26 Moz-based only the Moz-based browsers exhibit the problem. I'm posting here first but it may be an HTML or CSS issue. Which I would then pursue in an appropriate Usenet group. I have tested this on a varity of sites online and most do not exhibit this but several do. Any thoughts welcome. One additional thing. John Gilliver, who mentioned this to me origianlly, noted that it only happens when clicking in the scroll bar space. It does NOT happen if using the PAGE DOWN key (in Windows). I confirmed that. Interesting. Yes, I've seen this behaviour before. It appears to me that clicking inside the scroll bar track bases the page-down behaviour on the overall size of the window rather than just the scrolling frame of the site. Pressing the space bar to page-down bases the behaviour on the frame. I'd call this a bug. The scroll slider moves to where I click. I'm not seeing any problem. GW To reproduce the issue, OS X must be configured to Jump to the next page, not Jump to the spot that's clicked. Is that a joke? Ever since my first mouse with a scroll wheel I have never even used the slider, I was just trying to duplicate the OP problem, and his page works fine for me.. GW No, that's not a joke. Maybe I didn't understand what you wrote, but I took what you wrote to mean that wherever you click in the scroll track, your page immediately scrolls to that position. That would, to me, indicate that your OS X is configured to 'Jump to the spot that's clicked'. If that is, indeed, the setting you've got in System Preferences/General, you will not be able to reproduce the OP's problem. -- / // Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan // Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Odd scrolling behavior
On 1/20/14 6:56 AM +0900, Ray_Net wrote: Trane Francks wrote, On 19/01/2014 11:45: On 1/19/14 6:40 PM +0900, Ray_Net wrote: Ed Mullen wrote, On 19/01/2014 02:00: Okay, here's a weird one. Someone was perusing one of my Web sites and said, to paraphrase: If I click in the vertical scroll bar below the handle (grippy) the page scrolls down more than one full screen. That is, the vast majority of pages (I've checked many) will scroll so that the bottom of the first page is now at the top. The pages on my site scroll up past that, so that the content of the initial screen is above the top of the page. Meaning that the user will be missing, not see, some content. I cannot give a definitive example since it depends to some extent upon browser window size. But, try it at, for instance: http://edmullen.net/mozilla/moz_combine.php I only give this page as an example because it requires several scroll-downs to see the entire page. Then try any Amazon.com page. I haven't found one where it happens. Oddly, having checked it in: IE 11 Opera 18 Chrome 32 Safari (Windows) 5 Pale Moon 24 Moz-based SeaMonkey 2 Moz-based Firefox 26 Moz-based only the Moz-based browsers exhibit the problem. I'm posting here first but it may be an HTML or CSS issue. Which I would then pursue in an appropriate Usenet group. I have tested this on a varity of sites online and most do not exhibit this but several do. Any thoughts welcome. I exhibit also the problem - But who's care ? The developers are not interested :-) Same as the bug i encounter here: I am interested to reply ... both groups Seamonkey and Firefox are interested about the follow-up of this thread. BUT because i am not interested to follow the mozilla.support.firefox i did not subscribe to this group. SM refuse that i post to both group :-( So i was obliged to not reply into mozilla.support.firefox :-( And as i said before: who's care ? ... :-) Interestingly, I was able to reply to both, even though I'm only subscribed to m.s.s. Perhaps because you are on SM 2.23 ? (i am stuck on 2.17) Yes, I'm current on the latest stable release. In earlier versions, I have experienced the behaviour you described. Maybe they fixed it, but it could merely be coincidental. -- / // Trane Franckstr...@gol.comTokyo, Japan // Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is anyone here using AdBlock Edge extension?
On 1/19/2014 8:54 AM, Ant wrote: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/ and https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/adblock-edge/ ... It is a fork from AdBlock Plus v2.1.2 without the acceptable ads feature. Thank you in advance. :) By the way, AdBlock Plus is now at version 2.4.1. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam, flames, and trolling from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Message pane opening after junk message viewing
Daniel wrote, on 18/1/2014 07:16: On 18/01/14 19:51, Allen wrote: Rubens wrote: Hello, In my mail view layout I don´t use the message pane (F8 keyboard shorcut). However, after opening a junk mail message which was wrongly marked as junk, the message panel comes up and remains active for any other message opened further, until I manually hide it again by clicking on its border or unchecking the option in the menu or pressing F8. That behaviour was not present in previous Seamonkey version. Is there any setting for disabling it ? Regards, Rubens I have observed the same thing and I find it annoying as well. Hopefully someone knows of a setting to completely disable the preview pane. Allen The only way I've heard of to disable the preview pane, is to drag the divider, between the Threads Pane and the Message Pane, to the bottom of the screen. I have done that, but it keeps coming back again every time a junk message is opened. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Troubleshooting hang on close?
I'm running Seamonkey on Windows 8.1 64-bit, with 8 GB RAM. It never closes cleanly, whenever I close it, it winds up remaining in memory consuming about 460 MB or so, and I have to kill the process. Consequently, none of the 'remember setting on next startup' features work, i.e. reopening closed tabs, or remembering the position of the split pane in the mail client. I don't know if it's because of an extension or something else, but is there a way to troubleshoot faulty extensions without creating a fresh profile and reinstalling them one by one? - If you're afraid of loneliness, do not marry. -- Anton Chekhov - ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Troubleshooting hang on close?
Rex wrote: I'm running Seamonkey on Windows 8.1 64-bit, with 8 GB RAM. It never closes cleanly, whenever I close it, it winds up remaining in memory consuming about 460 MB or so, and I have to kill the process. Consequently, none of the 'remember setting on next startup' features work, i.e. reopening closed tabs, or remembering the position of the split pane in the mail client. I don't know if it's because of an extension or something else, but is there a way to troubleshoot faulty extensions without creating a fresh profile and reinstalling them one by one? You don't need to uninstall for testing purposes. Do CTRL-SHIFT-A or go to about:addons and you'll see a list of your installed extensions. For each one, click the Disable button. Then follow this routine: 1) Restart the program and test. 2) If no problems, pick one of your extensions and enable it. Lather, rinse, repeat. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
