Re: Flashblock 1.5 can be made to work in SeaMonkey 2.31!
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/10/2014 7:01 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few simple
steps:
1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flashblock/
2. Copy the link to download Flashblock from the button Download Now
or use the link I have provided below:
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/latest/433/addon-433-latest.xpi?src=dp-btn-primary
3. Go to the Addonconverter page:
http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/convert.php
4. Paste the download link for Flashblock (see step 2 for the link url)
into the box below this phrase:
or paste direct link to xpi file or full URL of add-on page at
https://addons.mozilla.org/:;
5. Click Convert at the bottom of the page and you will be prompted to
install Flashblock in SeaMonkey. You can safely ignore the warnings
about installing Flashblock. After SeaMonkey restarts you will once
again have Flashblock up and running in SeaMonkey.
I hope this helps. :)
Why bother? FlashBlock 1.3.20 for SeaMonkey was released at the same
time as Flashblock 1.5.17 was released for Firefox. They are both
available at http://flashblock.mozdev.org/.
On the other hand, FlashBlock 4.20.13 for Firefox is available at
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flash-block/. I
converted this for SeaMonkey compatibility at
http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/, but I have not yet tried
installing and using it.
If you were paying attention FlashBlock 1.3.20 does not work with
SeaMonkey 2.31. So if you want to use Flashblock you have to convert
Flashblock 1.5 so that it will work with Seamonkey.
Plus the latest version of Flashblock IS 1.5.18!
Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for SeaMonkey is
1.3.21, which should be good even for SeaMonkey versions starting with
3.nnn.
What SeaMonkey versions start with 3.nnn.?? Or do you mean SM 2.3nn,
David??
No, I really meant 3.nnn. The install.rdf file for Flashblock 1.3.21
anticipates a future SeaMonkey version number beginning with 3. Note
the em:maxVersion in the following fragment from that install.rdf file:
!-- Seamonkey TNG --
em:targetApplication
Description
em:id{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}/em:id
em:minVersion2.1/em:minVersion
em:maxVersion3.*/em:maxVersion
/Description
/em:targetApplication
Ahh!! So it should work for every edition up to and *excluding* ver
3.n!! That seems reasonable.
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.29 Build identifier: 20140829003846
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.31 Build identifier: 20141020202138
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Which SM to get? Win XP3.
On 12/12/14 02:38, Ed Mullen wrote: Daniel wrote on 12/11/2014 3:39 AM: On 11/12/14 05:29, Ed Mullen wrote: Daniel wrote on 12/10/2014 3:45 AM: On 10/12/14 17:10, Paul wrote: SM suggestions wanted. This machine has Windows XP3. Google recently made Maps incompatible with IE8 and I cannot upgrade to IEx. SM1119 has not worked with google maps in years, so it looks like time to upgrade to a newer SM. I don't care about viruses, security, or the latest-greatest thing. What ever I get I will likely stick with for 10 years. Except for gmaps, JS and Flash will be OFF. Any good functional or compatibility reason to get or not to get SM 2.30? Reading this NG for years, it would appear that all other versions have multiple problems. Paul, I've been using SeaMonkey, through several upgrades, with Google Maps for about a year. No problems noted until Google recently modified how the maps display, but still usable. HTH Daniel, I don't seem to be having any trouble with Google maps on 2.31. What problems are there? Ed, prior to about a month ago, there was a panel occupying the left hand 1/3 of screen. There I could select Get Direction and there would be places to enter the From and To location. When I go to Google Maps now, the Map takes up the entire screen, virtually, with just a little area in the bottom right that you click on to enter the From and To locations and then, after you have zoomed in to actually be able to see the From and To location, the Map wants to zoom out to, basically, full scale, so you cannot see all the twists and turns. An inconvenience!! Like this? http://edmullen.net/temp/gmaps.jpg Someone posted this link in another thread here-abouts!! https://www.google.com/maps?output=classic Just got to make it Australia-centric! :-) -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.29 Build identifier: 20140829003846 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.31 Build identifier: 20141020202138 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Western vs Unicode - why doesn't SM pick the right one?
flyguy wrote: Most of my email displays properly with Western character encoding, but about 10-20% requires selecting Unicode from the ViewCharacter Encoding list. I've tried to make SM select it automatically, but it still doesn't. Is there anyway to make it pick the proper character encoding? just fill in unicode8 at the right places sincerely -- Vink User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/34.0 SeaMonkey/2.31 Windows7 Premium 32bits --- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. http://www.avast.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
click here to always load remote content
Is it just my install of Seamonkey that never remembers that i've clicked to always load remote content this morning I clicked again to always load... on an e'mail that felt familiar... opened the addressbook to find multiple copies of the very same e'mail address of several dozen of my most received newsletters... sean ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.31 crashes
NFN Smith wrote: Follow-up item... NFN Smith wrote: I have a PortableApps version of Seamonkey that's suddenly crashing, following update to 2.31. I started the PortableApps version in safe mode, and no crash. From there, I disabled all my extensions, and then re-enabled, one at a time (with restarts). At the moment, all the extensions are active again, and no startup problems. Smith I was getting crashes at exit with the Mac version...fixed it by going back to 2.26.1. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Flashblock 1.5 can be made to work in SeaMonkey 2.31!
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM:
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/10/2014 7:01 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is
the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few
simple
steps:
1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flashblock/
2. Copy the link to download Flashblock from the button Download
Now
or use the link I have provided below:
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/latest/433/addon-433-latest.xpi?src=dp-btn-primary
3. Go to the Addonconverter page:
http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/convert.php
4. Paste the download link for Flashblock (see step 2 for the
link url)
into the box below this phrase:
or paste direct link to xpi file or full URL of add-on page at
https://addons.mozilla.org/:;
5. Click Convert at the bottom of the page and you will be
prompted to
install Flashblock in SeaMonkey. You can safely ignore the warnings
about installing Flashblock. After SeaMonkey restarts you will once
again have Flashblock up and running in SeaMonkey.
I hope this helps. :)
Why bother? FlashBlock 1.3.20 for SeaMonkey was released at the same
time as Flashblock 1.5.17 was released for Firefox. They are both
available at http://flashblock.mozdev.org/.
On the other hand, FlashBlock 4.20.13 for Firefox is available at
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flash-block/. I
converted this for SeaMonkey compatibility at
http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/, but I have not yet tried
installing and using it.
If you were paying attention FlashBlock 1.3.20 does not work with
SeaMonkey 2.31. So if you want to use Flashblock you have to convert
Flashblock 1.5 so that it will work with Seamonkey.
Plus the latest version of Flashblock IS 1.5.18!
Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for SeaMonkey is
1.3.21, which should be good even for SeaMonkey versions starting with
3.nnn.
What SeaMonkey versions start with 3.nnn.?? Or do you mean SM 2.3nn,
David??
No, I really meant 3.nnn. The install.rdf file for Flashblock 1.3.21
anticipates a future SeaMonkey version number beginning with 3. Note
the em:maxVersion in the following fragment from that install.rdf file:
!-- Seamonkey TNG --
em:targetApplication
Description
em:id{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}/em:id
em:minVersion2.1/em:minVersion
em:maxVersion3.*/em:maxVersion
/Description
/em:targetApplication
Ahh!! So it should work for every edition up to and *excluding* ver
3.n!! That seems reasonable.
Err, I think that means up to and INCLUDING ver. 3.x.
--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
I'm not tense, just terribly, terribly alert.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Flashblock 1.5 can be made to work in SeaMonkey 2.31!
Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM:
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/10/2014 7:01 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/9/2014 7:26 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote:
Flashblock 1.5.18 is not Compatible with SeaMonkey 2.31 nor is
the older
version for SeaMonkey. But it can be made compatible with a few
simple
steps:
1. go to the Firefox Add-Ons page for Flashblock:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flashblock/
2. Copy the link to download Flashblock from the button Download
Now
or use the link I have provided below:
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/downloads/latest/433/addon-433-latest.xpi?src=dp-btn-primary
3. Go to the Addonconverter page:
http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/convert.php
4. Paste the download link for Flashblock (see step 2 for the
link url)
into the box below this phrase:
or paste direct link to xpi file or full URL of add-on page at
https://addons.mozilla.org/:;
5. Click Convert at the bottom of the page and you will be
prompted to
install Flashblock in SeaMonkey. You can safely ignore the warnings
about installing Flashblock. After SeaMonkey restarts you will once
again have Flashblock up and running in SeaMonkey.
I hope this helps. :)
Why bother? FlashBlock 1.3.20 for SeaMonkey was released at the same
time as Flashblock 1.5.17 was released for Firefox. They are both
available at http://flashblock.mozdev.org/.
On the other hand, FlashBlock 4.20.13 for Firefox is available at
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flash-block/. I
converted this for SeaMonkey compatibility at
http://addonconverter.fotokraina.com/, but I have not yet tried
installing and using it.
If you were paying attention FlashBlock 1.3.20 does not work with
SeaMonkey 2.31. So if you want to use Flashblock you have to convert
Flashblock 1.5 so that it will work with Seamonkey.
Plus the latest version of Flashblock IS 1.5.18!
Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for SeaMonkey is
1.3.21, which should be good even for SeaMonkey versions starting with
3.nnn.
What SeaMonkey versions start with 3.nnn.?? Or do you mean SM 2.3nn,
David??
No, I really meant 3.nnn. The install.rdf file for Flashblock 1.3.21
anticipates a future SeaMonkey version number beginning with 3. Note
the em:maxVersion in the following fragment from that install.rdf file:
!-- Seamonkey TNG --
em:targetApplication
Description
em:id{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}/em:id
em:minVersion2.1/em:minVersion
em:maxVersion3.*/em:maxVersion
/Description
/em:targetApplication
Ahh!! So it should work for every edition up to and *excluding* ver
3.n!! That seems reasonable.
Err, I think that means up to and INCLUDING ver. 3.x.
[gerardjan@gershwin ~]$ fortune
Nice guys finish last.
-- Leo Durocher
[gerardjan@gershwin ~]$
--
Vink
home:http://ciudadpatricia.com
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/34.0 SeaMonkey/2.31b2 Build identifier: 20141020202138
/*
* Oops. The kernel tried to access some bad page. We'll have to
* terminate things with extreme prejudice.
*/
die_if_kernel(Oops, regs, error_code);
-- From linux/arch/i386/mm/fault.c
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: click here to always load remote content
On 12/12/2014 10:36 AM, sean wrote: Is it just my install of Seamonkey that never remembers that i've clicked to always load remote content this morning I clicked again to always load... on an e'mail that felt familiar... opened the addressbook to find multiple copies of the very same e'mail address of several dozen of my most received newsletters... sean This started a version or two ago with SeaMonkey. I don't think anyone is working on the problem -- This is America! You can't make a horse testify against himself! Mister Ed ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Which SM to get? Win XP3.
Daniel wrote: Someone posted this link in another thread here-abouts!! https://www.google.com/maps?output=classic Just got to make it Australia-centric! :-) Change the www.google.com domain to the Australian version: https://www.google.com.au/maps?output=classic Similarly, for the UK: https://www.google.co.uk/maps?output=classic Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Western vs Unicode - why doesn't SM pick the right one?
flyguy wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote, On 12/11/2014 1:42 PM: flyguy wrote: Most of my email displays properly with Western character encoding, but about 10-20% requires selecting Unicode from the ViewCharacter Encoding list. I've tried to make SM select it automatically, but it still doesn't. Is there anyway to make it pick the proper character encoding? It should pick up the encoding from the Content-Type header of the email. Having said that, at one time I used to find the message pane in the main window didn't switch encodings when moving between emails, but pressing F8 a couple of times to hide and then show it again sorted it out. Haven't noticed that problem for a long time now. Even then, fully opening emails in a separate window did use the correct encoding. Alternatively, it could be that the problematic emails have the wrong encoding, or perhaps no encoding, specified in the header. e.g. the sending application has specified iso-8859-1 in the header but actually encoded the content in utf-8. If that's the case, at least you've got an option to manually override the encoding so that it can be displayed correctly ;o) I forgot to mention I'm using SM 2.26 on a Win 8.1 computer. For the record, I'm currently using SM 2.26.1 on Windows Vista. The email has these lines in it: I hope you mean when looking at the message source; you shouldn't see these lines when reading normally (I do occasionally see some of the source in the message pane, but pressing F8 a couple of times to hide and show the message pane fixes that - which you mention below doesn't help in your case so I don't think that's it). Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_--=_MCPart_1762143897 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed ... and two or three with Content-Type in parenthesis. The content following Content-Type: text/plain... will be the plain text version. If there's a text/html alternative SeaMonkey will probably display that instead, unless you've set View Message Body As Plain Text. I'm not sure what you mean about Content-Type being in parentheses, but that may be the problem. It would be interesting to see the complete structure of one of those emails. If you're not sure what to look for and there's nothing in one of them you don't mind sharing, it's probably easiest to View Message Source, copy the source into a plain text document, and upload it somewhere (or send as an attachment, but copy my address - mozilla-lists.mbourne at spamgourmet.com - if you do that as I think the mailing list strips attachments). Otherwise you could try picking out the parts defining the structure and just copy them into an email. Basically you'd be looking for: - the main Content-Type header - any blocks starting with one of the separators mentioned as the boundary parameter to any of the Content-Type lines, up to the next blank line (these blocks will probably contain another Content-Type header and possibly others) For an email with attachments as well as plain text and HTML alternative parts, there should be something like the following; text in square brackets is notes I've added: [several headers] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_006_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ [several more headers] --_006_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_000_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ --_000_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [content as plain text] --_000_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [content as HTML] --_000_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_-- --_006_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ Content-Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; name=filename.docx Content-Description: filename.docx Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=filename.docx; size=188079; creation-date=Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:30:02 GMT; modification-date=Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:30:02 GMT Content-ID: 88d57fea92099c4c89f4f2d3f8011...@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 [attachment] --_006_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_-- Pressing f8 has no effect; neither does opening the email in it's own window. I suspected it wouldn't, but thought it worth mentioning in case it helped. Mark. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Western vs Unicode - why doesn't SM pick the right one?
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: The content following Content-Type: text/plain... will be the plain text version. If there's a text/html alternative SeaMonkey will probably display that instead, unless you've set View Message Body As Plain Text. I'm not sure what you mean about Content-Type being in parentheses, but that may be the problem. It would be interesting to see the complete structure of one of those emails. If you're not sure what to look for and there's nothing in one of them you don't mind sharing, it's probably easiest to View Message Source, copy the source into a plain text document, and upload it somewhere (or send as an attachment, but copy my address - mozilla-lists.mbourne at spamgourmet.com - if you do that as I think the mailing list strips attachments). It probably includes a plain-text version and an HTML version, separated by the specified boundary. The encoding specification may be different in the different parts, though in principle it shouldn't be. The OP might try View | Message Body As... and choose a different option from the one he's viewing now. If at least one of the parts is correctly specified and encoded, he'll get a workable view. If not, he'll have to force the right encoding by choosing it from View | Encoding... There's not an awful lot SeaMonkey can do to guess correctly if the sending program lies about the encoding. In such cases, only ad hoc user intervention works. But once you've found the right answer, replying works fine. BTW, you're not doing yourself any good by munging your address in your message body if you give the clear version in your From: field; you're only inconveniencing your correspondents. If you really want to hide from the spambots, do it in the From field as well. As it is, your clear address appears in the attribution line of every reply (see above). -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.31 chase web site
Marisa Ciceran wrote: Same problem here as of the start of this weekend. I've been on the phone several times with Chase support about this and this time the agent I spoke to said he sent a note to their compatibility developers. I am on 64-bit Windows 7 Pro on on ASUSI7 4790k processor. Marisa NoOp wrote: On 12/08/2014 10:21 AM, Lemuel Johnson wrote: On 12/8/2014 10:52 AM, NoOp wrote: On 12/08/2014 05:23 AM, J. Weaver Jr. wrote: Ken Rudolph wrote: Ron wrote: Just got the 2.31 upgrade now I can't log in to my account on chase.com I hit logon it just reloads the log on page. Works in IE and Seamonkey 2.30 Same thing happening here. This is frustrating. Can I go back to Seamonkey 2.30? Or maybe spoof the browser to firefox (which used to work when bank sites didn't accept SeaMonkey)? Same problem here: worked great with IE 2.30, not at all with 2.31. sigh Is there a Bugzilla entry for this yet? -JW https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109471 ( Unable to login at chase.com due to NS_ERROR_FAILURE (SeaMonkey only)) and for reference, here is a previous one that was fixed last year: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924025 (Unable to log in at chase.com) I believe that's actually https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1094714 Lem Johnson You are correct - thanks for the catch! Gary Well, that is enough reason to hold back from upgrading for me! I have a Chase account, so until this is fixed or there is a work-around this one is a show-stopper. Dave ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Seamonkey 2.31 session restore.
Is there a way to get Seamonkey to ask if I want to restore individual windows or tabs at start up? TIA ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey 2.31 session restore.
louis.a.r...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to get Seamonkey to ask if I want to restore individual windows or tabs at start up? I see how to have it always restore the previous session, but not how to get it to ask. Edit | Preferences | Browser: Display on [Browser Startup]: (•) Restore Previous Session -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Flashblock 1.5 can be made to work in SeaMonkey 2.31!
On 13/12/14 03:26, Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel wrote on 12/12/2014 7:14 AM:
On 12/12/14 02:51, David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:30 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 11/12/14 14:12, David E. Ross wrote:
Snip
Flashblock 1.5.18 is for Firefox. The latest version for SeaMonkey is
1.3.21, which should be good even for SeaMonkey versions starting with
3.nnn.
What SeaMonkey versions start with 3.nnn.?? Or do you mean SM 2.3nn,
David??
No, I really meant 3.nnn. The install.rdf file for Flashblock 1.3.21
anticipates a future SeaMonkey version number beginning with 3. Note
the em:maxVersion in the following fragment from that install.rdf
file:
!-- Seamonkey TNG --
em:targetApplication
Description
em:id{92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a}/em:id
em:minVersion2.1/em:minVersion
em:maxVersion3.*/em:maxVersion
/Description
/em:targetApplication
Ahh!! So it should work for every edition up to and *excluding* ver
3.n!! That seems reasonable.
Err, I think that means up to and INCLUDING ver. 3.x.
So does that mean it's good up to Ver 3.99?? I thought the maxVersion
was the Version at which it would stop working!!
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.29 Build identifier: 20140829003846
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.31 Build identifier: 20141020202138
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Which SM to get? Win XP3.
On 13/12/14 08:43, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Daniel wrote: Someone posted this link in another thread here-abouts!! https://www.google.com/maps?output=classic Just got to make it Australia-centric! :-) Change the www.google.com domain to the Australian version: https://www.google.com.au/maps?output=classic Similarly, for the UK: https://www.google.co.uk/maps?output=classic Mark. Hey, that makes sense!! I was thinking of dragging the map, as appropriate, and then look for a Save this View. setting. -- Daniel User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.29 Build identifier: 20140829003846 or User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.31 Build identifier: 20141020202138 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Western vs Unicode - why doesn't SM pick the right one?
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote, On 12/12/2014 2:40 PM: flyguy wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote, On 12/11/2014 1:42 PM: flyguy wrote: Most of my email displays properly with Western character encoding, but about 10-20% requires selecting Unicode from the ViewCharacter Encoding list. I've tried to make SM select it automatically, but it still doesn't. Is there anyway to make it pick the proper character encoding? It should pick up the encoding from the Content-Type header of the email. Having said that, at one time I used to find the message pane in the main window didn't switch encodings when moving between emails, but pressing F8 a couple of times to hide and then show it again sorted it out. Haven't noticed that problem for a long time now. Even then, fully opening emails in a separate window did use the correct encoding. Alternatively, it could be that the problematic emails have the wrong encoding, or perhaps no encoding, specified in the header. e.g. the sending application has specified iso-8859-1 in the header but actually encoded the content in utf-8. If that's the case, at least you've got an option to manually override the encoding so that it can be displayed correctly ;o) I forgot to mention I'm using SM 2.26 on a Win 8.1 computer. For the record, I'm currently using SM 2.26.1 on Windows Vista. The email has these lines in it: I hope you mean when looking at the message source; you shouldn't see these lines when reading normally (I do occasionally see some of the source in the message pane, but pressing F8 a couple of times to hide and show the message pane fixes that - which you mention below doesn't help in your case so I don't think that's it). Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_--=_MCPart_1762143897 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed ... and two or three with Content-Type in parenthesis. The content following Content-Type: text/plain... will be the plain text version. If there's a text/html alternative SeaMonkey will probably display that instead, unless you've set View Message Body As Plain Text. I'm not sure what you mean about Content-Type being in parentheses, but that may be the problem. It would be interesting to see the complete structure of one of those emails. If you're not sure what to look for and there's nothing in one of them you don't mind sharing, it's probably easiest to View Message Source, copy the source into a plain text document, and upload it somewhere (or send as an attachment, but copy my address - mozilla-lists.mbourne at spamgourmet.com - if you do that as I think the mailing list strips attachments). Otherwise you could try picking out the parts defining the structure and just copy them into an email. Basically you'd be looking for: - the main Content-Type header - any blocks starting with one of the separators mentioned as the boundary parameter to any of the Content-Type lines, up to the next blank line (these blocks will probably contain another Content-Type header and possibly others) For an email with attachments as well as plain text and HTML alternative parts, there should be something like the following; text in square brackets is notes I've added: [several headers] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_006_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ [several more headers] --_006_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_000_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ --_000_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [content as plain text] --_000_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [content as HTML] --_000_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_-- --_006_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_ Content-Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; name=filename.docx Content-Description: filename.docx Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=filename.docx; size=188079; creation-date=Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:30:02 GMT; modification-date=Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:30:02 GMT Content-ID: 88d57fea92099c4c89f4f2d3f8011...@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 [attachment] --_006_141836474851268922sparsholtacuk_-- Pressing f8 has no effect; neither does opening the email in it's own window. I suspected it wouldn't, but thought it worth mentioning in case it helped. I just forwarded the email to your spamgourment address. Oddly, tonight SM is displaying the email properly. The View Character encoding shows as Unicode after I click on the email, even if I set it to Western beforehand. I'm fairly sure I didn't change anything. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Third-party cookie question
This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? * -- They have a series of annoying scripts that grind SM to a halt and must be aborted before the site becomes usable. The URLs are constantly changing; today's version was at http://cdn.nhle.com/projects/ice3-ui/com.nhl.ice3.ui.t5.components/GlobalPageImports/dist/js/GlobalPageImports.min.js?v=8.9:1. And I'm constantly updating my custom filter in AdBlock Plus. That isn't my question. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Third-party cookie question
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This evening, I cleared all private data (including cache and cookies), and then visited nhl.com. Immediately after aborting their troublesome javascript,* I inspected my cookies and discovered that google.com had set a cookie. Now, my cookie policy at Edit | Preferences | Privacy Security | Cookies is Allow cookies for the originating website only (no third-party cookies). So how was Google able to set a cookie if I never visited their site? It's bad enough that they update their dossier on me when I visit their own sites, do they have to do it everywhere else, too?\ More to the point, how can I set SeaMonkey to do as it says and block third-party cookies? * -- They have a series of annoying scripts that grind SM to a halt and must be aborted before the site becomes usable. The URLs are constantly changing; today's version was at http://cdn.nhle.com/projects/ice3-ui/com.nhl.ice3.ui.t5.components/GlobalPageImports/dist/js/GlobalPageImports.min.js?v=8.9:1. And I'm constantly updating my custom filter in AdBlock Plus. That isn't my question. -- Vink home:http://ciudadpatricia.com User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/34.0 SeaMonkey/2.31b2 Build identifier: 20141020202138 /* * Oops. The kernel tried to access some bad page. We'll have to * terminate things with extreme prejudice. */ die_if_kernel(Oops, regs, error_code); -- From linux/arch/i386/mm/fault.c ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?
Hi Folks, So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if it's older than a certain version. But.. the update button takes one to a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions: 1. How does one update it?, or 2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for extensions). (Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh) Help! Thanks, Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. Yogi Berra ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: updating or uninstalling flash plug-in?
Miles Fidelman wrote: Hi Folks, So it looks like Seamonkey automatically disables the Flash plug-in if it's older than a certain version. But.. the update button takes one to a security alert, not an update page, which leads to two questions: You're right, that's really user-unfriendly and has been for some time. 1. How does one update it?, or If you skim through all the fine print in the security alert (I assume you're referring to http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-27.html or something like it), you'll find a link to Adobe's download center. Once you've done it a couple of times, you'll learn to scan through all the chaff and find it. You're looking for the phrase Flash Player Download Center near the bottom. 2. How does one remove it, to force sites to push HTM5 video (there is no remove button under tools/add-ons/plugins, the way there is for extensions). (Seamonkey 2.31, Macintosh) On Windows, the program has to be removed via the Control Panel -- it's not a feature of the browser, but an independent program (though it does generally play nice with the browser). For the Mac, look here: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315 -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
