Re: Status of official 2.48 release

2017-02-02 Thread Rainer Bielefeld 
On 02.02.17 21:21, Mason83 wrote:
> What is the status for the official 2.48 release?

Hello,

WIP, details see here
.

CU

Rainer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Status of official 2.48 release

2017-02-02 Thread djc 

On 3/02/2017 11:42 AM, PhillipJones wrote:

Mason83 wrote:

Hello,

What is the status for the official 2.48 release?

There have been no updates to the SM blog:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/

If I update to akalla's 2.48, it should be 100% compatible
with the official release, right?

Regards.

I've been looking for this 2.48 update for SeaMonkey Mac for days . It 
ain't showing up,



You could try
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-mac64/

I don't know Mac formats, but presumably one of these is the exe?

[ ] seamonkey-2.48.en-US.mac64.complete.mar 2017-02-01 18:2552M 
[ ] seamonkey-2.48.en-US.mac64.dmg  2017-02-01 18:2452

I've been using Adrian's windows builds, even experimental 64bit 
versions with few problems. YMMV


Cheers, djc
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with Copernic search

2017-02-02 Thread Alexander Yudenitsch 

George wrote, on 31 Jan 17 10:11:


I'm a user of Copernic Desktop Search.  It's frustrating that SeaMonkey
and Copernic don't co-exist.  Any chance of that changing? Or, does
SeaMonkey work on TEXT searches in emails with any other similar desktop
search apps?  The SeaMonkey built-in search is not user-friendly.


The SM Mail search is one of the main reasons I keep using SM; it may 
not be very 'user friendly', but it's the most powerful search I ever 
found -- and, a few years back I did look at Copernic, hoping to find a 
similarly powerful search for the all the contents of my system, but it 
appeared that, besides not doing that, it even didn't work with SM (only 
TB), so I stopped trying.


What I find most useful in SM Mail search is the ability to add "match 
all/match any" (usually the former) for an unlimited amount of 'logical 
rules' (like "subject contains X" AND "date is before 07/08/09" AND 
"body contains 'george'" AND "body does not contain 'mac'"), allowing me 
to usually pinpoint a specific message from over 10 years' worth, 
distributed in about 100 folders and sub-folders -- and that 'Boolean 
logic' is very rare among search engines of any type (I suppose it's not 
very user-friendly, but for me it's VERY useful).


Also, Copernic (like Windows itself) wants to index everything, which SM 
doesn't need to furnish quick and accurate search results.


I'd LOVE to find any 'general' search engines with characteristics 
similar to SM Mail Search, specially if it doesn't need indexing, but so 
far haven't found any.  Maybe there is 'more than one way to skin a 
cat', and I'm missing it?


--
Thanks beforehand for your attention, and I hope to hear from you soon.

s) Alexander Yudenitsch   



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: How do I stop Junk Mail (Spam) ?

2017-02-02 Thread Paul B. Gallagher 

PhillipJones wrote:


You don't I've been marking the same sends and subjects on a
Particular email add res as junk  then delete and I still get the
same Identical subjects and senders day after day after day.  I
thought when you marked a subject and sender as spam it was supposed
to go automatically to Junk or spam Folder. Has worked that way in
ages.


Check your settings at

Edit | Preferences | Mail & Newsgroups | Junk & Suspect Mail

[x] When I mark messages as junk:
(•) Move them to the account's "Junk" folder
(o) Delete them

Mark Messages as read:
[ ] When SeaMonkey determines that they are junk
[x] When I manually mark them as junk

You may have inadvertently reset (cleared) the training data, in which 
case SM will have forgotten all it ever learned and started over. If you 
resume training it, it'll eventually learn again, but not in one day.


--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: How do I stop Junk Mail (Spam) ?

2017-02-02 Thread PhillipJones 

sean wrote:

Richard Alan wrote:

sean wrote:


On 01/19/2017 10:41 AM, sean wrote:

On 01/18/2017 03:16 PM, Richard Alan wrote:

[snippage]

Are you using "contains"?


Yes, I'm using contains... its not that I dunno how to filter it out of
my inbox, but I like defeating the source. I've had zero spam for a
number of years... absolutely zero incoming.


You'll never be able to defeat a true spammer.


Perhaps I'm tilting at windmills, Don Quixote was the first book I
recollect my father handing me to read in 2nd grade.

Taking this on as a distraction & challenge as I divert my attention
away from my oh so political mother wanting to be friends on
facebook...

IP:104.47.40.128   ...


Is that actually the sending address of your spam?



I'm guessing now though, there's probably no good reason to report it
back to any of the addresses listed on the whois page for the
onmicrosoft domain, likely to only get my own self blacklisted

http://www.whois.com/whois/markmonitor.com

sean


Rather ironic that the originating server is from a "brand protection
company" ... ... Is this what Microsoft's Azure morphed into?

https://www.markmonitor.com/


I've no idea what you're getting into there.


I'm e'mailing all the addresses on that page with a polite  request to
double check their servers... ;~)


I see your smiley. I also doubt if you will ever be successful in your
quest. Just figure out a way to filter it or ignore it.



Happy to report, its been more than a week since I received any junk
mail from the previously offending domains attached to markmonitor
(dot)com. While they denied any cuplability, they must have forwarded it
to the IT department. Since that page is NOT a person but a company
which "monitors" the brand reputations of many "marks"

sean
You don't I've been marking the same sends and subjects on a Particular 
email add res as junk  then delete and I still get the same Identical 
subjects and senders day after day after day.  I thought when you marked 
a subject and sender as spam it was supposed to go automatically to Junk 
or spam Folder. Has worked that way in ages.


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.  "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net
http://phillipjones-cet.net/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Status of official 2.48 release

2017-02-02 Thread PhillipJones 

Mason83 wrote:

Hello,

What is the status for the official 2.48 release?

There have been no updates to the SM blog:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/

If I update to akalla's 2.48, it should be 100% compatible
with the official release, right?

Regards.

I've been looking for this 2.48 update for SeaMonkey Mac for days . It 
ain't showing up,


--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.  "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.netmailto:pjones...@comcast.net
http://phillipjones-cet.net/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Status of official 2.48 release

2017-02-02 Thread Mason83 
Hello,

What is the status for the official 2.48 release?

There have been no updates to the SM blog:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/

If I update to akalla's 2.48, it should be 100% compatible
with the official release, right?

Regards.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Status of official 2.48 release

2017-02-02 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl 

> What is the status for the official 2.48 release?

ewong is supposed to be back tomorrow. He did celebrate the chinese new year.

> If I update to akalla's 2.48, it should be 100% compatible
> with the official release, right?

Yes as always. Adrian builds from the official trees.

FRG

Mason83 wrote:

Hello,

What is the status for the official 2.48 release?

There have been no updates to the SM blog:
https://blog.seamonkey-project.org/

If I update to akalla's 2.48, it should be 100% compatible
with the official release, right?

Regards.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: NoSquint Plus extension.

2017-02-02 Thread NoOp 
On 2/2/2017 6:03 AM, Isaac Schemm wrote:
> mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
>> NoOp wrote:
>>> On 1/31/2017 9:13 PM, Ant wrote:
 On 1/30/2017 5:21 PM, NoOp wrote:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/
> Click on the "Check if SeaMonkey version is available" button.

 Weird. I don't see a "Check if SeaMonkey version is available"
 button.

>>>
>>> Check here:
>>> 
>>
>> I can't speak for Ant, but that's not what I see using SeaMonkey 2.46 on
>> Windows. The green button you've circled says "Only with Firefox - Get
>> Firefox Now!" and, as its title suggests, leads to a page to download
>> Firefox.
>>
>> I see the same regardless of whether or not "Advertise Firefox
>> compatibility" is enabled. Do you perhaps have a customised user-agent
>> string, or an extension modifying how AMO appears?
>>
> 
> I believe it's this extension:
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/amo-browsing-for-seamonkey/
> 

Ah yes! Thanks Isaac - I'd forgotten that I have that addon installed on
all of my systems. That certainly explains why I get the "Check if
SeaMonkey version is available". Thank you.

@Ant et al: install
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/amo-browsing-for-seamonkey
and then visit the pages again... sorry.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-02-02 Thread J. Weaver Jr. 

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

My 2.48 came as an automatic update to the 2.47 I was using.

I've noticed one bug so far: the default button (usually "OK") on most
dialogs is active and functional, but _visually_ "greyed out", with the
legend just barely visible.  -JW


Seems to be a problem with the Default Theme, and applies to "moused 
over" buttons as well as the "default" button. Reported as 
  -JW

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: How do I stop Junk Mail (Spam) ?

2017-02-02 Thread sean 

Richard Alan wrote:

sean wrote:


On 01/19/2017 10:41 AM, sean wrote:

On 01/18/2017 03:16 PM, Richard Alan wrote:

[snippage]

Are you using "contains"?


Yes, I'm using contains... its not that I dunno how to filter it out of
my inbox, but I like defeating the source. I've had zero spam for a
number of years... absolutely zero incoming.


You'll never be able to defeat a true spammer.


Perhaps I'm tilting at windmills, Don Quixote was the first book I
recollect my father handing me to read in 2nd grade.

Taking this on as a distraction & challenge as I divert my attention
away from my oh so political mother wanting to be friends on
facebook...

IP:104.47.40.128   ...


Is that actually the sending address of your spam?



I'm guessing now though, there's probably no good reason to report it
back to any of the addresses listed on the whois page for the
onmicrosoft domain, likely to only get my own self blacklisted

http://www.whois.com/whois/markmonitor.com

sean


Rather ironic that the originating server is from a "brand protection
company" ... ... Is this what Microsoft's Azure morphed into?

https://www.markmonitor.com/


I've no idea what you're getting into there.


I'm e'mailing all the addresses on that page with a polite  request to
double check their servers... ;~)


I see your smiley. I also doubt if you will ever be successful in your
quest. Just figure out a way to filter it or ignore it.



Happy to report, its been more than a week since I received any junk 
mail from the previously offending domains attached to markmonitor 
(dot)com. While they denied any cuplability, they must have forwarded it 
to the IT department. Since that page is NOT a person but a company 
which "monitors" the brand reputations of many "marks"


sean
--
who still misses Tagzilla...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: NoSquint Plus extension.

2017-02-02 Thread Isaac Schemm 

mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:

NoOp wrote:

On 1/31/2017 9:13 PM, Ant wrote:

On 1/30/2017 5:21 PM, NoOp wrote:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/
Click on the "Check if SeaMonkey version is available" button.


Weird. I don't see a "Check if SeaMonkey version is available"
button.



Check here:



I can't speak for Ant, but that's not what I see using SeaMonkey 2.46 on
Windows. The green button you've circled says "Only with Firefox - Get
Firefox Now!" and, as its title suggests, leads to a page to download
Firefox.

I see the same regardless of whether or not "Advertise Firefox
compatibility" is enabled. Do you perhaps have a customised user-agent
string, or an extension modifying how AMO appears?



I believe it's this extension:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/amo-browsing-for-seamonkey/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with Copernic search

2017-02-02 Thread George 
I do know of a workaround involving installing Thunderbird in addition 
to SeaMonkey.  Thinking about doing it...not sure if it's worth it. I 
know it did work years ago with Thunderbird 12, I think it was. Maybe.


Richmond wrote:

Maybe you could trick the software by creating a shortcut from the
Seamonkey mail to the Thunderbird mail. (Or is it from TB to SM?)


George  writes:


There's one thing I can doand I've been avoiding it as long as I
can...switch to Thunderbird.  I love SeaMonkey, but want to use
Copernic with my email.  Thanks for the response, Frank.

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

Does it additionally use an add-on or is it a standalone product
only.  If standalone the program itself probably needs to be
changed. SeaMonkey uses the same folder structure and format as
Thunderbird. If the program recognizes only a TB profile nothing we
can do.

FRG

George wrote:

Richard, thanks for your response. My apologies for not going into
more detail about Copernic.  Here's a link to them, landing on a
list of files it will find...

http://www.copernic.com/en/products/desktop-search/file-types/

Notice it works with Thunderbird. When searching with Copernic,
you'll see an instant search result, regardless of the email folder.
SeaMonkey's search only works with one folder at a time.

What do I want that neither does nicely?  I'll have to think about
that I guess.  Take a look at the website.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with Copernic search

2017-02-02 Thread Richmond 
Maybe you could trick the software by creating a shortcut from the
Seamonkey mail to the Thunderbird mail. (Or is it from TB to SM?)


George  writes:

> There's one thing I can doand I've been avoiding it as long as I
> can...switch to Thunderbird.  I love SeaMonkey, but want to use
> Copernic with my email.  Thanks for the response, Frank.
>
> Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
>> Does it additionally use an add-on or is it a standalone product
>> only.  If standalone the program itself probably needs to be
>> changed. SeaMonkey uses the same folder structure and format as
>> Thunderbird. If the program recognizes only a TB profile nothing we
>> can do.
>>
>> FRG
>>
>> George wrote:
>>> Richard, thanks for your response. My apologies for not going into
>>> more detail about Copernic.  Here's a link to them, landing on a
>>> list of files it will find...
>>>
>>> http://www.copernic.com/en/products/desktop-search/file-types/
>>>
>>> Notice it works with Thunderbird. When searching with Copernic,
>>> you'll see an instant search result, regardless of the email folder.
>>> SeaMonkey's search only works with one folder at a time.
>>>
>>> What do I want that neither does nicely?  I'll have to think about
>>> that I guess.  Take a look at the website.
>>
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with Copernic search

2017-02-02 Thread George 
There's one thing I can doand I've been avoiding it as long as I 
can...switch to Thunderbird.  I love SeaMonkey, but want to use Copernic 
with my email.  Thanks for the response, Frank.


Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

Does it additionally use an add-on or is it a standalone product only.
If standalone the program itself probably needs to be changed. SeaMonkey
uses the same folder structure and format as Thunderbird. If the program
recognizes only a TB profile nothing we can do.

FRG

George wrote:

Richard, thanks for your response. My apologies for not going into
more detail about Copernic.  Here's a link to them, landing on a list
of files it will find...

http://www.copernic.com/en/products/desktop-search/file-types/

Notice it works with Thunderbird. When searching with Copernic, you'll
see an instant search result, regardless of the email folder.
SeaMonkey's search only works with one folder at a time.

What do I want that neither does nicely?  I'll have to think about
that I guess.  Take a look at the website.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-02-02 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl 
The sad truth is that until more people actively contribute this won't change 
e.g. has a fairly low priority. Basically pick the minor version number add 3 
and look up the corresponding Firefox release notes.


For 2.46 the fix for the just discovered zero day vulnerability was backported.

FRG


Yamo' wrote:

Hi,

NoOp a écrit le 31/01/2017 à 22:25 :

Security information is still on 2.38:





I didn't found a bug report ; I've reported a new one.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

2017-02-02 Thread Yamo' 
Hi,

NoOp a écrit le 31/01/2017 à 22:25 :
> Security information is still on 2.38:
> 
> 


I didn't found a bug report ; I've reported a new one.


-- 

Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
http://pasdenom.info/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with Copernic search

2017-02-02 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl 
Does it additionally use an add-on or is it a standalone product only. If 
standalone the program itself probably needs to be changed. SeaMonkey uses the 
same folder structure and format as Thunderbird. If the program recognizes 
only a TB profile nothing we can do.


FRG

George wrote:
Richard, thanks for your response. My apologies for not going into more detail 
about Copernic.  Here's a link to them, landing on a list of files it will 
find...


http://www.copernic.com/en/products/desktop-search/file-types/

Notice it works with Thunderbird. When searching with Copernic, you'll see an 
instant search result, regardless of the email folder. SeaMonkey's search only 
works with one folder at a time.


What do I want that neither does nicely?  I'll have to think about that I 
guess.  Take a look at the website.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey