Re: DoH and SeaMonkey

2020-02-25 Thread Frank-Rainer Grahl

Paul Bergsagel wrote:

Hi,

Does SeaMonkey support DoH and if it does how can it be enabled?

Also does anyone know the pros and cons of using DoH?


Thanks.


Not supported. No plans to backport.

My personal opionen: Open technologies are replaced with obscure 
implementations benefitting the big players more and more. This is one of the 
efforts.


FRG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: What happens next?

2020-02-25 Thread Daniel

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 26/02/2020 12:49 AM:

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
2.49.4 is in the current Opensuse repository although it is not 
installed by default (and has not been since it was called Netscape 
4.8 or so).
2.49.5 is in the mozilla/experimental repository but I can't get 
Lightning to work properly on my experimental machine so I'm sticking 
with this level for the time being.


If they built with --disable-calendar or not enabling it Lightning 
will not work. There are some binary components which need to go into 
SeaMonkey.


I am using a locally self compiled 2.53.1 with OpenSuse. I suggest 
just using the official version from seamonkey-project.org



FRG


I have copied my entire /home filesystem - not just the .mozilla part - 
to this updated machine and now Lightning is behaving as it should. Does 
Lightning use files outside the .mozilla subdirectory?  (I should 
probably ask that somewhere else).


(I should probably ask that somewhere else).  Yeap, somewhere else 
like mozilla.support.calendar newsgroup on this same news server, I'm 
guessing, Don! ;-P


--
Daniel

Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134


Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


DoH and SeaMonkey

2020-02-25 Thread Paul Bergsagel

Hi,

Does SeaMonkey support DoH and if it does how can it be enabled?

Also does anyone know the pros and cons of using DoH?


Thanks.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: iframe codes cause havoc uploading htmls

2020-02-25 Thread tangerinetwilight
I am talking about using "publish" through Composer 
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


iframe codes cause havoc uploading htmls

2020-02-25 Thread tangerinetwilight
If I upload a html with iframes embedded, it causes all kinds of havoc on my 
uploads from there on out.  It will send the html to the wrong folder even 
though it is has been checked TEN THOUSAND TIMES to be sent to the folder it's 
suppose to be.  

All web pages have to be deleted off the web providers server and reuploaded to 
make changes. This is because it will not rewrite the page if iframes are 
included. The only thing that has worked is to edit code at server and only 
after the page with no iframe codes on it has been uploaded.then you 
have to enter aka add the iframe codes on the host editor by hand there.  This 
makes working on pages and making changes practically impossible.
  
I've tried everything .   Maybe it's my host.  Desperate for feedback.
Leslie.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

2020-02-25 Thread David E. Ross
On 2/25/2020 2:27 PM, EE wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> I believe the preference variable is
>>  media.autoplay.enabled
>> If false, HTML5 media is disabled.  If true, HTML5 media is enabled.
>>
>> At least, this is how I control HTML5 media via PrefBar.  It does seem
>> to work.
> 
> That is not strictly true.  HTML5 autoplay is disabled.  There should still 
> be 
> a play button you can click to get it to play, in most cases.  There are a 
> few 
> sites where you need autoplay enabled to get the video to play even after you 
> click the play button, but I have an extension that gives me a button to 
> toggle the setting.
> 

By default, I have media.autoplay.enabled set to false.  When there is a
video I want to play, I use PrefBar to change it to true (selecting a
checkbox on the PrefBar tool bar).  I then reload the Web page, and the
video plays.

With media.autoplay.enabled set to false, I just now loaded a YouTube
Web page with Bizet's L'Arlésienne Suites No. 1 & No. 2.  There was no
button to start the video.  I then changed media.autoplay.enabled to
true, but there still was no way to play the video.  The video started
after I reloaded the Web page; at that point, buttons did appear.

-- 
David E. Ross


Beyond Meat and other such vegetarian meat substitutes
represent the ultimate in ultra-processed foods.  Real
meat is natural.  Beyond Meat is definitely not.  No,
I do NOT own a cattle ranch, a butcher shop, or any
other business doing commerce in meat.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

2020-02-25 Thread EE

David E. Ross wrote:

I believe the preference variable is
media.autoplay.enabled
If false, HTML5 media is disabled.  If true, HTML5 media is enabled.

At least, this is how I control HTML5 media via PrefBar.  It does seem
to work.


That is not strictly true.  HTML5 autoplay is disabled.  There should still be 
a play button you can click to get it to play, in most cases.  There are a few 
sites where you need autoplay enabled to get the video to play even after you 
click the play button, but I have an extension that gives me a button to 
toggle the setting.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Bug in SM-2.53.2 regarding reply adresses

2020-02-25 Thread Hartmut Figge
Hartmut Figge:

[...]
Forgot to mention why I posted here. So you can test too. .-D

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

2020-02-25 Thread NFN Smith

Danny Kile wrote:


Issue was resolved by restoring a backup copy of my user profile file. I 
have no idea why this all started with an upgrade to Adobe Flash Player.


Thank you for those that replied,



Glad to see that it's working again.

Going one step further, I think chances are pretty high that you don't 
need Flash at all, and it's likely to be safe to uninstall entirely.


I removed Flash a couple of years ago, and I've only seen a couple of 
sites that complain about Flash not being available, and they're not 
ones that I care about delivering video content.  I've had no problems 
at all with YouTube and not having Flash installed.


With proprietary video players, I've found that it's generally best to 
uninstall everything, unless you know that you have specific need for 
one. If you encounter a site that requires a specific player, they'll be 
quick to let you know (and generally offer you a link for a download). 
But until you know you need a specific player, you don't need it.


If the only reason that you have Flash is for YouTube, I suggest that 
you uninstall it.  One less potential security issue, and one less thing 
that you have to maintain with timely updates.


Smith

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Bug in SM-2.53.2 regarding reply adresses

2020-02-25 Thread Hartmut Figge
Greetings,

after discovering problems regarding reply using my current SM I
downloaded the latest build from Bill and tested that.

Build identifier: 20200224130011

It's better than my current build :), but there are still issues.
Started in a new profile, no configuration except creating an account
for news.mozilla.org and subscribing to mozilla.test.

Tests by using the arrow down options at the right of Reply and Reply
All icons in the toolbar.

1) Trying to reply to one of my own postings
  a) Reply to Newsgroup
 OK
  b) Reply to Sender Only
 The template shows correctly the To: field but it is empty
 Bug
  c) Reply to Sender and Newsgroup
 The line with the Newsgroup: field is correct, the line with the
   To: field is missing
 Bug
  d) Reply to all Recipients
 The line with the Newsgroup: field is correct, the line with the
   To: field is missing
 Bug

Trying to reply to a posting of another poster
  a) Reply to Newsgroup
 OK
  b) Reply to Sender Only
 OK
  c) Reply to Sender and Newsgroup
 The line with the To: field is missing
 Bug
  d) Reply to all Recipients
 OK

Hartmut
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: Flash Player and YouTube Problems

2020-02-25 Thread Danny Kile

Danny Kile wrote:

I am running Windows 7 Home Premium and SeaMonkey 2.49.5 UserAgent is

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:69.0) 
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/69.0


I recently got a message from Adobe saying I needed to upgrade Flash 
Player. Well, stupid me said OK. (What's that old saying if it ain't 
broke don't fix it. Well, it was not broke put now it is.


When I went to YouTube it would not play any videos. Uninstalled the new 
version and went to my archives and installed a version that I knew 
worked. Well that did not fix the problem.


It show all the recommended boxes that should play reviews of things you 
may want to see. However, all the boxes are are gray boxes. All of the 
web site is mostly gray there are link and radio buttons they to are gray.


I uninstalled that version and now I have no flash player installed. 
What course of action do I need to take here?


Drive Booster says all my drivers are up to date. Plus they are the same 
driver I was using when it was working, before Adobe screwed me over.


Thank you for any help you maybe able to give.

Danny,


Issue was resolved by restoring a backup copy of my user profile file. I 
have no idea why this all started with an upgrade to Adobe Flash Player.


Thank you for those that replied,

Danny
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey


Re: What happens next?

2020-02-25 Thread Don Spam's Reckless Son

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:

Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
2.49.4 is in the current Opensuse repository although it is not 
installed by default (and has not been since it was called Netscape 
4.8 or so).
2.49.5 is in the mozilla/experimental repository but I can't get 
Lightning to work properly on my experimental machine so I'm sticking 
with this level for the time being.


If they built with --disable-calendar or not enabling it Lightning will 
not work. There are some binary components which need to go into SeaMonkey.


I am using a locally self compiled 2.53.1 with OpenSuse. I suggest just 
using the official version from seamonkey-project.org



FRG


I have copied my entire /home filesystem - not just the .mozilla part - 
to this updated machine and now Lightning is behaving as it should. 
Does Lightning use files outside the .mozilla subdirectory?  (I should 
probably ask that somewhere else).


--
spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey