Re: updates... *finally*?

[E Wong]

Edmund Wong wrote:

Hi All,

Just wish to announce that I believe the updates are working
now.

Please confirm.  I tried it locally and it looks ok.

Edmund



On the x86 Windows, it seems to be working; but I haven't
actually gotten my Win8.1's 2.39 updated.  ;/

Hopefully, will be able to pick Callek's brain
on this.

Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: I love SeaMonkey - please keep it the same!

[E Wong]

Ray_Net wrote:


Nowhere that I could find.

So you have two bugs for the price of one.
1. The Load this bookmark in the sidebar option is not working.
2. Once set, you cannot reset the Load this bookmark in the sidebar
option.


Is there a bug filed for this?

Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

2.12.1 updates

[E Wong]

Hi All,

Due to a goofup on my part, the -2.12.1 updates were not
updating properly.

As far as I can see, this problem has been rectified.

Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Temporary files...

[E. Wong]

Joao Daniel wrote:

Hey! I've been using SeaMonkey Portable and I've been wondering: where
does it store temporary navigation files? Is it in the flash drive the
program is installed on or in the computer I'm running it?

Thanks in advance.

Pardon my ignorance, but what's SeaMonkey Portable?

Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: this is what i hink ...

[E. Wong]

Keith Whaley wrote:

E. Wong wrote:

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 7/21/2011 6:15 PM, km wrote:

... it is gud for people to make comments abt what needs
to be fixed with 'sm' BUTT these same people should suggest
a way to implement their solution code.

... if you are NOT technical you should STFU!


I'm not sure if your vitriol was meant against us Developers/People who
do code/work on SeaMonkey in our free time.


I think the post is directed at those who complain about
features/bugs not fixed and the post was to suggest that
they add some constructive criticism in the form of
'code'.

IOW, if you don't know how to fix the darn bugs, find ways
of helping or STFU.

That's my take of the post.

Edmund


The percentage of folks even CAPABLE of coding has to be quite small, in
comparison to the total lot of SM users, so your sophomoric response is
unacceptable.


Read the post before you post.  That's my take of the post.  Means
I am paraphrasing what I took as the original poster's intent.

Perhaps I should have spelt it more clearly so it won't be misread.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: this is what i hink ...

[E. Wong]

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 7/21/2011 6:15 PM, km wrote:

... it is gud for people to make comments abt what needs
to be fixed with 'sm' BUTT these same people should suggest
a way to implement their solution code.

... if you are NOT technical you should STFU!


I'm not sure if your vitriol was meant against us Developers/People who
do code/work on SeaMonkey in our free time.


I think the post is directed at those who complain about
features/bugs not fixed and the post was to suggest that
they add some constructive criticism in the form of
'code'.

IOW, if you don't know how to fix the darn bugs, find ways
of helping or STFU.

That's my take of the post.

Edmund
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey