Re: new 2.48 available

[Ed Mullen]

On 2/5/2017 at 3:58 PM, EE's prodigious digits fired off with great aplomb:

Ray Davison wrote:

Bret Busby wrote:

 what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?


Can you run SM?
Does "Help" appear at the top of the SM window?
If you click it does that produce a drop down that includes "About SM"?
If you click that does it yield the SM version?

That is standard for maybe all apps.

Ray



With Windows, can you not right-click the filename of the application
and get information that way?



Yes, but, you're depending on the writer of the program to include the 
information and many do not. FF does so that would work in this case.


--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net/
Are the kids on the Barney Show just too damn happy?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Ray_Net]

EE wrote on 05-02-17 21:58:

Ray Davison wrote:

Bret Busby wrote:

 what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?


Can you run SM?
Does "Help" appear at the top of the SM window?
If you click it does that produce a drop down that includes "About SM"?
If you click that does it yield the SM version?

That is standard for maybe all apps.

Ray


With Windows, can you not right-click the filename of the application 
and get information that way?



"Properties" then "Details" YEAH !
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[EE]

Ray Davison wrote:

Bret Busby wrote:

 what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?


Can you run SM?
Does "Help" appear at the top of the SM window?
If you click it does that produce a drop down that includes "About SM"?
If you click that does it yield the SM version?

That is standard for maybe all apps.

Ray


With Windows, can you not right-click the filename of the application 
and get information that way?


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Bret Busby]

On 05/02/2017, Ray Davison  wrote:
> Bret Busby wrote:
>>  what is the command to show the version number
>> that is installed, without having to load the application?
>
> Can you run SM?
> Does "Help" appear at the top of the SM window?
> If you click it does that produce a drop down that includes "About SM"?
> If you click that does it yield the SM version?
>
> That is standard for maybe all apps.
>
> Ray
>

Yes - I can do all of that.

As is in my signature, it was the particular wording of the question.

I do not remember whether Seamonkey (my installed version appears to
be 2.29.1, from memory - it is in a previous message that I posted),
can preserve sessions in the same way that Firefox, with the
appropriate plugin(s) installed, can, but, from memory, my last
Seamonkey session had many windows with many tabs, and would take an
hour or so, to load, and would probably run the system out of
resources, with the current session of Firefox, and so, to load all of
that, simply to find the installed version number, is a bit like using
a D-10 bulldozer, to chip a thistle plant.

As I have previously mentioned, with the system as described in the
full text of the question that I had posted, I had subsequently found
that running "seamonkey -v" at the command line, apparently achieved
what I sought.


-- 

Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia

..

"So once you do know what the question actually is,
 you'll know what the answer means."
- Deep Thought,
 Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
 "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
 A Trilogy In Four Parts",
 written by Douglas Adams,
 published by Pan Books, 1992


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Ray Davison]

Bret Busby wrote:

 what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?


Can you run SM?
Does "Help" appear at the top of the SM window?
If you click it does that produce a drop down that includes "About SM"?
If you click that does it yield the SM version?

That is standard for maybe all apps.

Ray


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[sean]

On 01/29/2017 04:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:
I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is 
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I 
am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no 
problems with my 2.47?




I've been running the 2.49a versions with no troubles, 2.50 & 2.51's 
still have issues...  I've got the last 2.49 Aurora build I can find from:


https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/nightly/2017/01/2017-01-23-01-30-01-comm-aurora/ 
   ...running as of today...


User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 
Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49a2

Build identifier: 20170123013001

--
The purpose of life is to be happy.
 ~ Dalai Lama
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[J. Weaver Jr.]

J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

My 2.48 came as an automatic update to the 2.47 I was using.

I've noticed one bug so far: the default button (usually "OK") on most
dialogs is active and functional, but _visually_ "greyed out", with the
legend just barely visible.  -JW


Seems to be a problem with the Default Theme, and applies to "moused 
over" buttons as well as the "default" button. Reported as 
  -JW

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

The sad truth is that until more people actively contribute this won't change 
e.g. has a fairly low priority. Basically pick the minor version number add 3 
and look up the corresponding Firefox release notes.


For 2.46 the fix for the just discovered zero day vulnerability was backported.

FRG


Yamo' wrote:

Hi,

NoOp a écrit le 31/01/2017 à 22:25 :

Security information is still on 2.38:





I didn't found a bug report ; I've reported a new one.




___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Yamo']

Hi,

NoOp a écrit le 31/01/2017 à 22:25 :
> Security information is still on 2.38:
> 
> 


I didn't found a bug report ; I've reported a new one.


-- 

Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
http://pasdenom.info/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[NoOp]

On 1/31/2017 2:14 PM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> Ok and bye.
> 
> FRG

Right...

It would be *very* helpful if you can advise which one of these fixed
bugs address the comparable CVE/security fixes on Firefox and Thunderbird:



and advise on the the current known vulnerabilities in 2.46 & which are
addressed in 2.48.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

Ok and bye.

FRG

NoOp wrote:


I never thought I'd do this, but I'm actually now starting to tweak
Thundebird UI/Themes so I can use on a full time basis, and using
alternative browsers for the same. I've had to switch all of my clients
from SeaMonkey as we are stuck in time with regards to security
patches/updates.

You know that I appreciate all that you and everyone that contributes to
the SeaMonkey project do, but I just can no longer risk my client's
online security by leaving SeaMonkey installed on their systems.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[NoOp]

On 1/31/2017 12:53 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> Its about:buildconfig in SeaMonkey and Firefox.
> 
> But this only gives you the changelog for the whole source tree including 
> Thunderbird.
> 
> FRG

Correct. Of course you can compare against the 2.47 build:


so I reckon the only way to tell any more is to look at the builds and
compare directly?

There is still no "official" 64bit build for SeaMonkey, so 64bit linux
users are pretty much left to contrib, Adrian's builds, and or
'Ubuntuzilla' builds (which are basically 'contrib' builds).

SeaMonkey meeting minutes seem to be the only place to find info any
longer...

Security information is still on 2.38:



At this point my primary concern is security updates. As noted here,
Firefox and Thunderbird have been addressing security issues on a full
time basis:




It would be *very* helpful if you can advise which one of these fixed
bugs address the comparable CVE/security fixes on Firefox and Thunderbird:



and advise on the the current known vulnerabilities in 2.46 & which are
addressed in 2.48.

I never thought I'd do this, but I'm actually now starting to tweak
Thundebird UI/Themes so I can use on a full time basis, and using
alternative browsers for the same. I've had to switch all of my clients
from SeaMonkey as we are stuck in time with regards to security
patches/updates.

You know that I appreciate all that you and everyone that contributes to
the SeaMonkey project do, but I just can no longer risk my client's
online security by leaving SeaMonkey installed on their systems.

> 
> Daniel wrote:
> ...
> 
>> Clicking on your about:build gets 
>> 
>> "Invalid Address
>> 
>> The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded.
>> 
>> The provided address is not in a recognized format. Please check the 
>> location 
>> bar for mistakes and try again."
>> 
>> Maybe that's a FF thing!!
>> 
> 

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[NoOp]

On 1/31/2017 12:26 AM, Daniel wrote:
> On 31/01/2017 8:46 AM, NoOp wrote:
>> On 01/30/2017 09:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote:
>>> Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit.  While I am asking questions,
>>> does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in
>>> this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version.
>>>
 change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> about:build
>>
>> Source
>>
>> Built from
>> https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-release/rev/1a420d3ee2c640a9688e75ddafd858c6551611e0
>>
>> Changelog is here:
>> 
>>
>>
> Clicking on your about:build gets 
> 
> "Invalid Address
> 
> The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded.
> 
> The provided address is not in a recognized format. Please check the 
> location bar for mistakes and try again."
> 
> Maybe that's a FF thing!!
> 

Sorry, it's:
about:buildconfig

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Bret Busby]

On 31/01/2017, Daniel  wrote:
> On 30/01/2017 6:06 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
>> On 30/01/2017, WaltS48  wrote:
>>> On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:
 I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
 not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
 am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
 problems with my 2.47?
>>>
>>> There is no official SeaMonkey 2.47 either. The current official
>>> SeaMonkey release is 2.46, released Dec. 22, 2016.
>>>
>>> You are probably using an unofficial build from Adrian. If he has an
>>> update available it's probably okay to use.
>>>
>>> The fragmentation of builds makes support a bit harder IMHO.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Visit Pittsburgh 
>>> Coexist 
>>> National Popular Vote 
>>> Ubuntu 16.04LTS
>>
>> Because your signature shows you to be using Ubuntu 16.04, as am I (I
>> use UbuntuMATE 16.04), what is the command to show the version number
>> that is installed, without having to load the application?
>>
>> Thank you in anticipation.
>>
> Brett, in about:config search for "useragent" (without the quotes) and
> set the pref "mailnews.headers.showUserAgent" to true, then, in the
> Header pane of e-mails and newsgroup posts, you should see the User
> Agent string  e.g. for me, yours shows as "" ... hmm, you don't show
> a User Agent in your headers. I was going to ask is you were posting via
> Google-groups, but as I see a "X-Usenet-Provider:
> http://www.giganews.com;, I'm guessing No!!
>
> --
> Daniel
>
> User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
> SeaMonkey/2.46 Build identifier: 20161213183751
> or
> User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101
> SeaMonkey/2.38 Build identifier: 20150903203501
> ___
> support-seamonkey mailing list
> support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
>

Hello.

Firstly, regarding the header, etc, I am running Firefox to access
gmail, for this access, for which, the gmail full header (in gmail,
selecting Show Original) shows

"
Original message
Message ID  

Re: new 2.48 available

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

Its about:buildconfig in SeaMonkey and Firefox.

But this only gives you the changelog for the whole source tree including 
Thunderbird.


FRG

Daniel wrote:
...


Clicking on your about:build gets 

"Invalid Address

The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded.

The provided address is not in a recognized format. Please check the location 
bar for mistakes and try again."


Maybe that's a FF thing!!



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Daniel]

On 31/01/2017 8:46 AM, NoOp wrote:

On 01/30/2017 09:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote:

Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit.  While I am asking questions,
does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in
this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version.


change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit.





about:build

Source

Built from
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-release/rev/1a420d3ee2c640a9688e75ddafd858c6551611e0

Changelog is here:




Clicking on your about:build gets 

"Invalid Address

The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded.

The provided address is not in a recognized format. Please check the 
location bar for mistakes and try again."


Maybe that's a FF thing!!

--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.46 Build identifier: 20161213183751

or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.38 Build identifier: 20150903203501

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Daniel]

On 31/01/2017 12:19 AM, Lee wrote:

On 1/30/17, me  wrote:

Pat Connors wrote:

I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
problems with my 2.47?


Maybe the hope that 2.48 has the corresponding security patches that
went into Firefox 51.0?



I think you should be certain where your browser came from. Saying it is
probably Adrians isn't really enough. Have you forgotten where you
downloaded it from? Where are you seeing this 2.48?


I'm seeing it at
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows32/
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/

Lee

Lee, did you notice the "/~akalla/unofficial/" in both those links?? 
Seems pretty obvious to me!


--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.46 Build identifier: 20161213183751

or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.38 Build identifier: 20150903203501

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Daniel]

On 30/01/2017 6:06 PM, Bret Busby wrote:

On 30/01/2017, WaltS48  wrote:

On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:

I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
problems with my 2.47?


There is no official SeaMonkey 2.47 either. The current official
SeaMonkey release is 2.46, released Dec. 22, 2016.

You are probably using an unofficial build from Adrian. If he has an
update available it's probably okay to use.

The fragmentation of builds makes support a bit harder IMHO.

--
Visit Pittsburgh 
Coexist 
National Popular Vote 
Ubuntu 16.04LTS


Because your signature shows you to be using Ubuntu 16.04, as am I (I
use UbuntuMATE 16.04), what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?

Thank you in anticipation.

Brett, in about:config search for "useragent" (without the quotes) and 
set the pref "mailnews.headers.showUserAgent" to true, then, in the 
Header pane of e-mails and newsgroup posts, you should see the User 
Agent string  e.g. for me, yours shows as "" ... hmm, you don't show 
a User Agent in your headers. I was going to ask is you were posting via 
Google-groups, but as I see a "X-Usenet-Provider: 
http://www.giganews.com;, I'm guessing No!!


--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.46 Build identifier: 20161213183751

or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 
SeaMonkey/2.38 Build identifier: 20150903203501

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Arnie Goetchius]

TCW wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:31:23 -0800, Pat Connors 
> wrote:
> 
>> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is 
>> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I 
>> am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no 
>> problems with my 2.47?
> 
> 2.48 is likely Adrian's build. If it builds ok on the official Mozilla
> site, it will be updated there soon. I am using 2.48 from Adrian's
> site too, no need to worry.
> 
Same here. I have one machine on my network that uses Adrian's build. It did an
automatic update from 2.47 to 2.48 in the last couple of days. The rest of the
network uses the official Mozilla builds and are still on 2.46
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[NoOp]

On 01/30/2017 09:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote:
> Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit.  While I am asking questions, 
> does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in 
> this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version.
> 
>> change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit. 
> 
> 

about:build

Source

Built from
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-release/rev/1a420d3ee2c640a9688e75ddafd858c6551611e0

Changelog is here:



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[WaltS48]

On 01/30/2017 02:06 AM, Bret Busby wrote:

On 30/01/2017, WaltS48  wrote:

On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:

I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
problems with my 2.47?




There is no official SeaMonkey 2.47 either. The current official
SeaMonkey release is 2.46, released Dec. 22, 2016.

You are probably using an unofficial build from Adrian. If he has an
update available it's probably okay to use.

The fragmentation of builds makes support a bit harder IMHO.





Because your signature shows you to be using Ubuntu 16.04, as am I (I
use UbuntuMATE 16.04), what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?



After 16 years since I have taken a Linux course, it came back to me, 
that -V along with the application name in a terminal window will 
provide the version of the application.


So, open a terminal window, type seamonkey -V and if it is installed via 
Ubuntu it should work.


If you installed it via a tarball, in another location than where Ubuntu 
installs, then you will have to enter the path to that location and use 
./seamonkey -V. I think.


Probably best to just open SeaMonkey and use Help > Troubleshooting 
Information.



___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

Mostly boring stuff under the hood compared to the jump from 2.40 to 2.46. 
Ratty fixed the default search engine setting which caused so much noise.


You can generate and up to date list of fixes for SeaMonkey in the status 
meeting notes:

https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2017-01-24

https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2017-01-24#2.47_skipped
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2017-01-24#2.48_planned_next_release

Additionally the Firefox 51.0.1 notes apply as do the TB release notes.

We retained the old error console which was removed from Firefox. It has a new 
internal url but most users will probably never notice :)


FRG

TCW wrote:

On 1/30/2017 11:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote:
Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit.  While I am asking questions, does 
anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in this 2.48 
version over the 2.47 version.


change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit. 


It's basically Firefox 51.0.1 under the hood as well as, I suspect, most of 
the fixes in Thunderbird 45.7.0.


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[EE]

Pat Connors wrote:

I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
problems with my 2.47?


Who said you had to switch?  2.46 is the current release.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[TCW]

On 1/30/2017 11:17 AM, Pat Connors wrote:
Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit.  While I am asking questions, 
does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in 
this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version.


change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit. 


It's basically Firefox 51.0.1 under the hood as well as, I suspect, most 
of the fixes in Thunderbird 45.7.0.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Pat Connors]

Thank you so much, yes, I do us 64 bit.  While I am asking questions, 
does anyone know if there is a place where I can read the changes in 
this 2.48 version over the 2.47 version.


change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit. 



--
Pat Connors
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[TCW]

On 1/30/2017 10:25 AM, Pat Connors wrote:


I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is 
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 
I am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no 
problems with my 2.47? 
I think you should be certain where your browser came from. Saying it 
is probably Adrians isn't really enough. Have you forgotten where you 
downloaded it from? Where are you seeing this 2.48?



I do not see where I wrote 'it is probably Adrians', I know it is 
Adrians but since I find it impossible to remember every website I visit 
and I didn't note the one where I downloaded Adrian's 2.47 because I 
thought it was just a temporary thing and now since 2.48 is not on the 
SeaMonkey site where I went to find 2.48, I asked if anyone had Adrian's 
site.  I haven't seen 2.48 except on this mailing list saying it was out.



https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows32/

change to ...-windows64/ if you use 64-bit.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[J. Weaver Jr.]

My 2.48 came as an automatic update to the 2.47 I was using.

I've noticed one bug so far: the default button (usually "OK") on most 
dialogs is active and functional, but _visually_ "greyed out", with the 
legend just barely visible.  -JW

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Pat Connors]

I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is 
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 
I am using? Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no 
problems with my 2.47? 
I think you should be certain where your browser came from. Saying it 
is probably Adrians isn't really enough. Have you forgotten where you 
downloaded it from? Where are you seeing this 2.48?



I do not see where I wrote 'it is probably Adrians', I know it is 
Adrians but since I find it impossible to remember every website I visit 
and I didn't note the one where I downloaded Adrian's 2.47 because I 
thought it was just a temporary thing and now since 2.48 is not on the 
SeaMonkey site where I went to find 2.48, I asked if anyone had Adrian's 
site.  I haven't seen 2.48 except on this mailing list saying it was out.


--
Pat Connors
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[WaltS48]

On 01/30/2017 02:06 AM, Bret Busby wrote:

On 30/01/2017, WaltS48  wrote:

On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:

I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
problems with my 2.47?




There is no official SeaMonkey 2.47 either. The current official
SeaMonkey release is 2.46, released Dec. 22, 2016.

You are probably using an unofficial build from Adrian. If he has an
update available it's probably okay to use.

The fragmentation of builds makes support a bit harder IMHO.





Because your signature shows you to be using Ubuntu 16.04, as am I (I
use UbuntuMATE 16.04), what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?


I have no idea and no interest in learning the command.

--
Visit Pittsburgh 
Coexist 
National Popular Vote 
Ubuntu 16.04LTS
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Lee]

On 1/30/17, me  wrote:
> Pat Connors wrote:
>> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
>> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
>> am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
>> problems with my 2.47?

Maybe the hope that 2.48 has the corresponding security patches that
went into Firefox 51.0?


> I think you should be certain where your browser came from. Saying it is
> probably Adrians isn't really enough. Have you forgotten where you
> downloaded it from? Where are you seeing this 2.48?

I'm seeing it at
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows32/
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~akalla/unofficial/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-release-windows64/

Lee
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[me]

Pat Connors wrote:
> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is 
> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I 
> am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no 
> problems with my 2.47?
> 

I think you should be certain where your browser came from. Saying it is
probably Adrians isn't really enough. Have you forgotten where you
downloaded it from? Where are you seeing this 2.48?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Bret Busby]

On 30/01/2017, WaltS48  wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:
>> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is
>> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I
>> am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no
>> problems with my 2.47?
>>
>
>
> There is no official SeaMonkey 2.47 either. The current official
> SeaMonkey release is 2.46, released Dec. 22, 2016.
>
> You are probably using an unofficial build from Adrian. If he has an
> update available it's probably okay to use.
>
> The fragmentation of builds makes support a bit harder IMHO.
>
> --
> Visit Pittsburgh 
> Coexist 
> National Popular Vote 
> Ubuntu 16.04LTS

Because your signature shows you to be using Ubuntu 16.04, as am I (I
use UbuntuMATE 16.04), what is the command to show the version number
that is installed, without having to load the application?

Thank you in anticipation.


-- 

Bret Busby
Armadale
West Australia

..

"So once you do know what the question actually is,
 you'll know what the answer means."
- Deep Thought,
 Chapter 28 of Book 1 of
 "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:
 A Trilogy In Four Parts",
 written by Douglas Adams,
 published by Pan Books, 1992


___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[Yamo']

WaltS48 a écrit le 30/01/2017 à 01:19 :
> On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:
>> I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is 
>> not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I 
>> am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no 
>> problems with my 2.47?
>>
> 
> 
> There is no official SeaMonkey 2.47 either. The current official 
> SeaMonkey release is 2.46, released Dec. 22, 2016.
> 
> You are probably using an unofficial build from Adrian. If he has an 
> update available it's probably okay to use.
> 
> The fragmentation of builds makes support a bit harder IMHO.
> 


Hi,

Version 2.48 seams to work fine.

There's also a version 5.3 of Lightning :


-- 

Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
http://pasdenom.info/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: new 2.48 available

[WaltS48]

On 01/29/2017 06:31 PM, Pat Connors wrote:
I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is 
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I 
am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no 
problems with my 2.47?





There is no official SeaMonkey 2.47 either. The current official 
SeaMonkey release is 2.46, released Dec. 22, 2016.


You are probably using an unofficial build from Adrian. If he has an 
update available it's probably okay to use.


The fragmentation of builds makes support a bit harder IMHO.

--
Visit Pittsburgh 
Coexist 
National Popular Vote 
Ubuntu 16.04LTS
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

new 2.48 available

[Pat Connors]

I have been using 2.47 without any problems, and I see this (2.48) is 
not on the SeaMonkey website, so is it not authorized as is the 2.47 I 
am using?  Is there a good reason why I should switch when I have no 
problems with my 2.47?


--
Pat Connors
http://www.connorsgenealogy.com
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey