Re: checky
No contact information there. No activity since 2005. Ubuntu 10.04 dropped checky. JeffM wrote: Miroslav Kolar wrote: How can checky be made working with Seamonkey? How about requesting that from the author. http://checky.sourceforge.net/help.html ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: checky
Hi, Miroslav Kolar a tapoté, le 22/10/2010 23:05: How can checky be made working with Seamonkey? May you can try HTML Validator : https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/seamonkey/addon/249/ -- Stéphane http://pasdenom.info ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: checky
Thank you very much! This validator works perfectly, Miroslav Stéphane Grégoire wrote: Hi, Miroslav Kolar a tapoté, le 22/10/2010 23:05: How can checky be made working with Seamonkey? May you can try HTML Validator : https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/seamonkey/addon/249/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: invalid security certificate Part 2
David E. Ross wrote: On 10/22/10 8:17 PM, JD wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 10/22/10 6:48 PM, JD wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 10/22/10 8:01 AM, JD wrote: OK, no takers on the first post so, how do I add a security certificate to SM? I've looked through Help but it's not very clear to me. From what I can tell, Verisign has updated something and SM 2.09 is not recognizing the change. Welcome to the wonderful world of over-protecting users. See the following bug reports, none of which seem to have much support among developers: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545498 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548380 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558222 It appears this worked for me: What is the value of browser.xul.error_pages.enabled in about:config? If it is true, as is default in Firefox, an SSL error on a full page or frame should give an error page with an Add Exception button instead of a pop-up. Mine was user set as false and changing it to true gave me the add exception button. I can't thank you enough for pointing me to the bug reports where I could finally find out how to over-ride this setting. As I pointed out in bug #548380, the preference variable browser.xul.error_pages.enabled controls too many unrelated error situations. I prefer to leave it false so that an invalid domain causes an error popup instead of a new error page. It was the only way I found to be able to view the web page I was being denied access to. Was there a better solution that I didn't see? Unfortunately, no. Since this is a one time occurrence, I've set it back to false since I've made an exception for the web page I need to view. And I've entered this work-around to my SM notes. -- JD.. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Password requirement - pop-up box
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20100930 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 This pop-up is persistent: http://i51.tinypic.com/149qjwp.jpg I seem to be able to connect to my 'everyday' news server to send/receive newsgroup messages - news.btinternet.com - without ever entering a 'Username'. I usually just click on 'Cancel' or 'OK' whenever I get this and the pop-up box disappears for a while. I'd be grateful if someone could/would explain why this might be happening - and the action I should take. Dave ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Password requirement - pop-up box
~BD~ wrote: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20100930 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 This pop-up is persistent: http://i51.tinypic.com/149qjwp.jpg I seem to be able to connect to my 'everyday' news server to send/receive newsgroup messages - news.btinternet.com - without ever entering a 'Username'. I usually just click on 'Cancel' or 'OK' whenever I get this and the pop-up box disappears for a while. I'd be grateful if someone could/would explain why this might be happening - and the action I should take. Dave if your ISP Provided a User Name and password you need to use password the ISP give you with your account. And when you get past this you will need supply the Password. If your have an account with Giganews, Eternal-September or another provider you'll need to supply user name and password provided. I'd recommend having SeaMonkey to remember username and password to reduce hassle factor. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net/ mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Password requirement - pop-up box
Phillip Jones wrote: ~BD~ wrote: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20100930 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 This pop-up is persistent: http://i51.tinypic.com/149qjwp.jpg I seem to be able to connect to my 'everyday' news server to send/receive newsgroup messages - news.btinternet.com - without ever entering a 'Username'. I usually just click on 'Cancel' or 'OK' whenever I get this and the pop-up box disappears for a while. I'd be grateful if someone could/would explain why this might be happening - and the action I should take. Dave if your ISP Provided a User Name and password you need to use password the ISP give you with your account. And when you get past this you will need supply the Password. If your have an account with Giganews, Eternal-September or another provider you'll need to supply user name and password provided. I'd recommend having SeaMonkey to remember username and password to reduce hassle factor. Thank you for your response, Phillip. My confusion stems from why I can access over 110,000 newsgroups through BT (a scheme in cooperation with Giganews) *without* supplying a User Name and/or password. Surely Sea Monkey should require them *before* it allows me to access these groups - or give no pop-up /after/ granting access. Dave ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Password requirement - pop-up box
On 10/23/10 8:13 AM, ~BD~ wrote: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20100930 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 This pop-up is persistent: http://i51.tinypic.com/149qjwp.jpg I seem to be able to connect to my 'everyday' news server to send/receive newsgroup messages - news.btinternet.com - without ever entering a 'Username'. I usually just click on 'Cancel' or 'OK' whenever I get this and the pop-up box disappears for a while. I'd be grateful if someone could/would explain why this might be happening - and the action I should take. Dave This might be a symptom of bug #338549. However, that bug was supposedly fixed several versions before 2.0.9. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338549. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ I am again filtering and ignoring all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of the amount of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Password requirement - pop-up box
David E. Ross wrote: On 10/23/10 8:13 AM, ~BD~ wrote: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.14) Gecko/20100930 SeaMonkey/2.0.9 This pop-up is persistent: http://i51.tinypic.com/149qjwp.jpg I seem to be able to connect to my 'everyday' news server to send/receive newsgroup messages - news.btinternet.com - without ever entering a 'Username'. I usually just click on 'Cancel' or 'OK' whenever I get this and the pop-up box disappears for a while. I'd be grateful if someone could/would explain why this might be happening - and the action I should take. Dave This might be a symptom of bug #338549. However, that bug was supposedly fixed several versions before 2.0.9. Seehttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338549. Thank you, David. I note that you have made comment at that URL. It's nice to know that it isn't just me! ;-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Personal Tool Bar
Hi - Using SeaMonkey 2.09 I can't drag my website links to the Personal Tool bar. Must be a simple item in the preferences that I'm overlooking. Any suggestions from the group? Thanks Norm ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
email certificates
I set up SeaMonkey with certificates for each email account. The major problem is to get the certificates recognized in Thunderbird and vice versa. I keep getting the broken key symbol. Something similar happens on the other end. The certificates are functional between the accounts I manage, but I do not have any external correspondents with other certificate enabled email clients to extend my range of testing. Unless I get a solution soon, I must abandon SeaMonkey. Has anyone compiled a list of email certificate problems, with or without solutions? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: checky ; HTML Validator
That was on customized Ubuntu 9.04 where installation of addon/249 went without any hitch. On Lucid 10.04 I had to do this to make it running: 1. Installed the extension from http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/download.html; but got message: FATAL ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not be found. 2. Downloaded http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu/pool/universe/g/gcc-3.3/libstdc++5_3.3.6-17ubuntu1_i386.deb 3. Run command: dpkg -i libstdc++5_3.3.6-17ubuntu1_i386.deb 4. Made symbolic links: ln -s /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.11/libxpcom.so /usr/lib/libxpcom.so ln -s /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.11/libxul.so /usr/lib/libxul.so (inspired by: http://www.robo47.net/blog/195-Installing-HTML-Validator-Extensions-for-Firefox-Iceweasel-on-Debian-6.0-Squeeze) 5. After restarting Seamonkey (2.0.8), I still got the error. I had to disable the Validator extension, restart SM again, then to enable the extension, restart SM, and then all finally worked as supposed. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: email certificates
James wrote: I set up SeaMonkey with certificates for each email account. The major problem is to get the certificates recognized in Thunderbird and vice versa. I keep getting the broken key symbol. Something similar happens on the other end. The certificates are functional between the accounts I manage, but I do not have any external correspondents with other certificate enabled email clients to extend my range of testing. Unless I get a solution soon, I must abandon SeaMonkey. Has anyone compiled a list of email certificate problems, with or without solutions? The same certificates will work just as good SeaMonkey as in Thunderbird. export your personal certificates (from Versign or thawte) to folder (directory) on your hard drive. you will have to supply your password used to create the certificate. and in some cases if you have password protected Thunderbird you'll have to supply that as well. When you import into SM you have to supply those password(s) again. Certificate meant for MS products will not work on Mozilla Products. The certificate have to be customized by the company (Thawte / Versign) for the email Client and the OS. But any customized for Mozilla (or Netscape) works on any Mozilla Product. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net/ mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: email certificates
Phillip Jones wrote: James wrote: I set up SeaMonkey with certificates for each email account. The major problem is to get the certificates recognized in Thunderbird and vice versa. I keep getting the broken key symbol. Something similar happens on the other end. The certificates are functional between the accounts I manage, but I do not have any external correspondents with other certificate enabled email clients to extend my range of testing. Unless I get a solution soon, I must abandon SeaMonkey. Has anyone compiled a list of email certificate problems, with or without solutions? The same certificates will work just as good SeaMonkey as in Thunderbird. export your personal certificates (from Versign or thawte) to folder (directory) on your hard drive. you will have to supply your password used to create the certificate. and in some cases if you have password protected Thunderbird you'll have to supply that as well. When you import into SM you have to supply those password(s) again. Certificate meant for MS products will not work on Mozilla Products. The certificate have to be customized by the company (Thawte / Versign) for the email Client and the OS. But any customized for Mozilla (or Netscape) works on any Mozilla Product. You misunderstand. The certificates are properly installed and working, but a recipient that is using Thunderbird can not read encrypted email sent to him and I can not read encrypted email received from him. SeaMonkey to SeaMonkey works fine. SeaMonkey to or from Thunderbird does not work at all. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: email certificates
Phillip Jones wrote: James wrote: I set up SeaMonkey with certificates for each email account. The major problem is to get the certificates recognized in Thunderbird and vice versa. I keep getting the broken key symbol. Something similar happens on the other end. The certificates are functional between the accounts I manage, but I do not have any external correspondents with other certificate enabled email clients to extend my range of testing. Unless I get a solution soon, I must abandon SeaMonkey. Has anyone compiled a list of email certificate problems, with or without solutions? The same certificates will work just as good SeaMonkey as in Thunderbird. export your personal certificates (from Versign or thawte) to folder (directory) on your hard drive. you will have to supply your password used to create the certificate. and in some cases if you have password protected Thunderbird you'll have to supply that as well. When you import into SM you have to supply those password(s) again. Certificate meant for MS products will not work on Mozilla Products. The certificate have to be customized by the company (Thawte / Versign) for the email Client and the OS. But any customized for Mozilla (or Netscape) works on any Mozilla Product. I have been using email certificates for years. The only time I had email certificate problems is when I started using SeaMonkey. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: invalid security certificate Part 2
David E. Ross wrote: On 10/22/10 8:17 PM, JD wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 10/22/10 6:48 PM, JD wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 10/22/10 8:01 AM, JD wrote: OK, no takers on the first post so, how do I add a security certificate to SM? I've looked through Help but it's not very clear to me. From what I can tell, Verisign has updated something and SM 2.09 is not recognizing the change. Welcome to the wonderful world of over-protecting users. See the following bug reports, none of which seem to have much support among developers: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545498 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548380 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558222 It appears this worked for me: What is the value of browser.xul.error_pages.enabled in about:config? If it is true, as is default in Firefox, an SSL error on a full page or frame should give an error page with an Add Exception button instead of a pop-up. Mine was user set as false and changing it to true gave me the add exception button. I can't thank you enough for pointing me to the bug reports where I could finally find out how to over-ride this setting. As I pointed out in bug #548380, the preference variable browser.xul.error_pages.enabled controls too many unrelated error situations. I prefer to leave it false so that an invalid domain causes an error popup instead of a new error page. It was the only way I found to be able to view the web page I was being denied access to. Was there a better solution that I didn't see? Unfortunately, no. As I surf online tonight, I see why I turned this to false. I use a HOSTS file and every little thing it blocks gives me a window that says it was unable to connect, for example: The connection was refused when attempting to contact ad.doubleclick.bs. The HOSTS file removes the bs advertisement but it's replaced with the irritating warning. It's a choice of irritations. -- JD.. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: email certificates
James wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: James wrote: I set up SeaMonkey with certificates for each email account. The major problem is to get the certificates recognized in Thunderbird and vice versa. I keep getting the broken key symbol. Something similar happens on the other end. The certificates are functional between the accounts I manage, but I do not have any external correspondents with other certificate enabled email clients to extend my range of testing. Unless I get a solution soon, I must abandon SeaMonkey. Has anyone compiled a list of email certificate problems, with or without solutions? The same certificates will work just as good SeaMonkey as in Thunderbird. export your personal certificates (from Versign or thawte) to folder (directory) on your hard drive. you will have to supply your password used to create the certificate. and in some cases if you have password protected Thunderbird you'll have to supply that as well. When you import into SM you have to supply those password(s) again. Certificate meant for MS products will not work on Mozilla Products. The certificate have to be customized by the company (Thawte / Versign) for the email Client and the OS. But any customized for Mozilla (or Netscape) works on any Mozilla Product. You misunderstand. The certificates are properly installed and working, but a recipient that is using Thunderbird can not read encrypted email sent to him and I can not read encrypted email received from him. SeaMonkey to SeaMonkey works fine. SeaMonkey to or from Thunderbird does not work at all. Oh you and he is supposed to send you public key to each other. The public key that each other receives works with the private keys if they fit you can talk. Go to Versign and look up Private key and Public key also look in SeaMonkey's help. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net/ mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM2's disk cache gets corrupted and stops working?
Hi! Has anyone seen this happen before? It seems once in a while (very rare and only seen it twice ever since SeaMonkey (SM) v2.0 final came out) on my updated, old Windows XP Pro. SP3 PC. about:cache shows something like this (restarted SM2 from this one): Memory cache device Number of entries: 18 Maximum storage size: 24576 KiB Storage in use: 170 KiB Inactive storage: 170 KiB List Cache Entries Disk cache device Number of entries: 0 Maximum storage size: 524288 KiB Storage in use: 589824 KiB Cache Directory: C:\Documents and Settings\foobar\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\agif1saa.default\Cache List Cache Entries Offline cache device Number of entries: 0 Maximum storage size: 512000 KiB Storage in use: 0 KiB Cache Directory: C:\Documents and Settings\foobar\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\agif1saa.default\OfflineCache List Cache Entries Listing cache entries from disk cache devices for about:cache?device=disk showed something like this: Disk cache device Number of entries: 0 Maximum storage size: 524288 KiB Storage in use: 589824 KiB Cache Directory: C:\Documents and Settings\foobar\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\agif1saa.default\Cache What happened to my entries? My visitation history looked OK (remember visited pages up to 8 days and 6,000 pages). I use 512 MB for my disk cache (I know its limit is 8,192 entries since I have never seen go it higher). If I tell SM to clear its disk cache and I surf, then things are back to normal. Is this a rare bug? I am not sure how to reproduce it yet. I know it is very rare and I assume crashes have to be rare. I have not seen this problem on my old 32-bit Debian/Linux box (don't use its SM2 much) and almost a year old 64-bit W7 HP office PC (SM2 likes to crash a lot -- seems to be related to Flash). However, they use small cache sizes (e.g., 150 MB). Is it maybe 512 MB too big? I set it high because my Internet can be slow. :/ I do download and surf the web a lot as a net addict. ;) I am going to try 150 MB to see if that still happens. Thank you in advance. :) -- Size isn't everything. The whale is endangered, while the ant continues to do just fine. --Bill Vaughan /\___/\ Phil./Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) / /\ /\ \Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net | |o o| | \ _ /If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link. ( ) If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed. Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey Developer Meeting 2010. Day 1 Saturday 23rd October.
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:28:29 +0800, Philip Chee wrote: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Developer_Meeting:2010:Conrep Dinner and getting to meet people in real life for the first time and find out how they really look like! Day 1 reports are now up: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Developer_Meeting:2010:Conrep#Day_01_Saturday_23rd_October_2010 Pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/aleytys/sets/72157625227729320/with/5108972045/ Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: invalid security certificate Part 2
On 10/23/10 6:33 PM, JD wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 10/22/10 8:17 PM, JD wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 10/22/10 6:48 PM, JD wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 10/22/10 8:01 AM, JD wrote: OK, no takers on the first post so, how do I add a security certificate to SM? I've looked through Help but it's not very clear to me. From what I can tell, Verisign has updated something and SM 2.09 is not recognizing the change. Welcome to the wonderful world of over-protecting users. See the following bug reports, none of which seem to have much support among developers: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545498 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=548380 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558222 It appears this worked for me: What is the value of browser.xul.error_pages.enabled in about:config? If it is true, as is default in Firefox, an SSL error on a full page or frame should give an error page with an Add Exception button instead of a pop-up. Mine was user set as false and changing it to true gave me the add exception button. I can't thank you enough for pointing me to the bug reports where I could finally find out how to over-ride this setting. As I pointed out in bug #548380, the preference variable browser.xul.error_pages.enabled controls too many unrelated error situations. I prefer to leave it false so that an invalid domain causes an error popup instead of a new error page. It was the only way I found to be able to view the web page I was being denied access to. Was there a better solution that I didn't see? Unfortunately, no. As I surf online tonight, I see why I turned this to false. I use a HOSTS file and every little thing it blocks gives me a window that says it was unable to connect, for example: The connection was refused when attempting to contact ad.doubleclick.bs. The HOSTS file removes the bs advertisement but it's replaced with the irritating warning. It's a choice of irritations. I use Adblock Plus to block such things as ad.doubleclick.net. It's available from http://adblockplus.org/en/. Using Adblock Plus leaves my Hosts file available for its intended purpose: a local DNS table. I also have an application that maintains it, updating the IP addresses for the domains I have added to Hosts. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ I am again filtering and ignoring all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of the amount of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
