Re: Mail Attachments - Save All or Detach All under Linux

[Nuno Silva]

On 2020-11-17, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:

> I have discovered this problem which occurs on two different machines
> with two different versions of Seamonkey - 2.53.3 and 2.53.5 - under
> OpenSuse.
> Given a mail with multiple attachments, "Save All" or "Detach All"
> starts a process which takes 100% of one processor but does otherwise
> nothing.
> If I Quit Seamonkey the process remains.
> If I kill the process instead of Quitting Seamonkey, Seamonkey dies
> with the process.
> Saving the attachments individually works.
>
> I repeated the test on my Windows 10 machine - with 2.53.4 - and there
> were no problems there.
> Is this a Seamonkey/Linux problem or a Seamonkey/OpenSuse problem?

Do you know which file picker is SeaMonkey using?

What is the value of the ui.allow_platform_file_picker setting? (You can
check that, for example, in about:config.)

(What is the separate process that gets started?)

-- 
Nuno Silva
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:23:46 +0800, /Edmund Wong/:


[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5


Just want to get a confirmation it is likely a false positive:

Windows 10 (Windows Defender/Security) flags the installer 
(seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe) to contain "Potentially Unwanted 
Software": PUA:Win32/Caypnamer.A!ml


Are others on Windows 10 getting this?



Donwloaded again and compared with the one I did get directly from the build 
server. 100% identical. After building I installed it in several of my Windows 
10 vms and two laptops without Windows defender making even a little beep. Has 
now been a few days ago but looks like a 99.9% false positive.


SHA256: fb546afd5d674e69a717a2d742c7b507c585a818ce2f025637d49da917d0be0c 
*seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe


FRG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Javascript

[Dirk Fieldhouse]

On 18/11/2020 15:16, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:

G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a 
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it.  Should I 
install Javascript and if so how to get it?  Thanks.


G.Ross


Javascript (as opposed to Java) is natively supported by pretty much all 
browsers, if that site thinks you don't have it then I see two 
possibilities:

- You have turned it off (Preferences -> Advanced -> Scripts & Plugins)
- You have something like Noscript running and that has turned it off 
for you, for this site.




Or the site tests for some JS primitive that SM doesn't implement.

Or the site doesn't recognise SM and proceeds on the assumption that it 
doesn't implement the JS level that it thinks is needed.


/df

--
London
UK
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!

[NFN Smith]

Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:


Are others on Windows 10 getting this?



Donwloaded again and compared with the one I did get directly from the 
build server. 100% identical. After building I installed it in several 
of my Windows 10 vms and two laptops without Windows defender making 
even a little beep. Has 
now been a few days ago but looks like a 99.9% false positive.


SHA256: fb546afd5d674e69a717a2d742c7b507c585a818ce2f025637d49da917d0be0c 
*seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe



For what it's worth, I took my own download of that file (taken from the 
normal location at 
https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/releases/2.53.5/win64/en-US/ 
), and I confirm the same SHA256 value.


I submitted to https://www.virustotal.com/gui/ .  On scanning, 
VirusTotal confirms the same SHA256 value, and reports all-clean reports 
from 71 scanners (including Microsoft), although it reports that Cylance 
considers the file to be unsafe.


The only time I've ever heard of Cylance is when using VirusTotal, and 
if I recall, their scanner tends to be exceptionally aggressive, and 
where they're more likely to flag things that nearly every other scanner 
considers to be clean.


I consider that consensus to be overwhelming, and where the response I 
see with Cylance, and what was reported with Microsoft to be false 
positives.


Smith
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: page broken SM2.53.5 FR on hybridlife.org

[jcteyssier]

jcteyssier a écrit :

Hello,
http://hybridlife.org/posts/151016/
this page show an infinite length down on SM2.53.5 at "document 
numérisé.pdf" document

On Firefox 82.0.2 it is normal on screen.

Tip: i try with a new profile on SM: same bad result
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

page broken SM2.53.5 FR on hybridlife.org

[jcteyssier]

Hello,
http://hybridlife.org/posts/151016/
this page show an infinite length down on SM2.53.5 at "document 
numérisé.pdf" document

On Firefox 82.0.2 it is normal on screen.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with blank windows

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

Greg Connell wrote:

On Wednesday, November 18, 2020 at 7:36:21 AM UTC-6, t19...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi everyone!
I get blank pop up windows after installing the newest SeaMonkey in the German 
version on my Mac OS 11.0.1 Any ideas?

I am using English version, same problem!!!  It makes it challenging to use 
SeaMonkey Composer to work on HTML.
I love the simple Composer. SeaMonkey please fix this issue.



To the best of my knowledge, that is one of the two fixes which will 
flow into 2.53.5.1.  I'm pretty clueless on that front, it is how I 
interpreted some of the other posts made here in the last couple of days.


--
spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!

[Stanimir Stamenkov via support-seamonkey]

Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:23:46 +0800, /Edmund Wong/:


[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5


Just want to get a confirmation it is likely a false positive:

Windows 10 (Windows Defender/Security) flags the installer 
(seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe) to contain "Potentially 
Unwanted Software": PUA:Win32/Caypnamer.A!ml


Are others on Windows 10 getting this?

--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Attachments - Save All or Detach All under Linux

[Nuno Silva]

On 2020-11-18, Nuno Silva wrote:

> On 2020-11-18, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
>
>> Nuno Silva wrote:
>>> On 2020-11-17, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
>>>
 I have discovered this problem which occurs on two different machines
 with two different versions of Seamonkey - 2.53.3 and 2.53.5 - under
 OpenSuse.
 Given a mail with multiple attachments, "Save All" or "Detach All"
 starts a process which takes 100% of one processor but does otherwise
 nothing.
 If I Quit Seamonkey the process remains.
 If I kill the process instead of Quitting Seamonkey, Seamonkey dies
 with the process.
 Saving the attachments individually works.

 I repeated the test on my Windows 10 machine - with 2.53.4 - and there
 were no problems there.
 Is this a Seamonkey/Linux problem or a Seamonkey/OpenSuse problem?
>>>
>>> Do you know which file picker is SeaMonkey using?
>>>
>>> What is the value of the ui.allow_platform_file_picker setting? (You can
>>> check that, for example, in about:config.)
>>>
>>> (What is the separate process that gets started?)
>>>
>>
>> ui.allow_platform_file_picker was set to false, that feels a bit weird.
>> I have no idea what the separate process is, "top -i" simply
>> identifies it as seamonkey.
>
> And is it really a separate process, and not the original seamonkey
> process? Could you please confirm this?
>
>> ok, setting ui.allow_platform_file_picker back to the default value is
>> as ugly as f*** but it works.  Thank you very muchly.
>>
>> I don't know why I had changed the value but it was probably either
>> something I read here - and which will have applied to an older level
>> - 
>> or (less likely) something which applied to Firefox.
>
> With that setting set to false, SeaMonkey uses the XUL file picker,
> which I can't use with directories / when saving multiple files
> (bug 1661070[1]), but I didn't see a separate process using 100% CPU
> (I'll check again).
>
> [1] http://bugzil.la/1661070

I don't see a new, separate process, but I see the high CPU usage (in
the seamonkey process) after doing Save As on multiple Mail
attachments using the XUL file picker.

This does not happen when I try to save multiple items in the Page Info
Media tab.

-- 
Nuno Silva
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with blank windows

[Rainer Bielefeld]

Thomas Pfanne schrieb:

I get blank pop up windows after installing the newest SeaMonkey in the German 
version on my Mac OS 11.0.1 Any ideas?


Hi,

it's
"Bug 1677316 - SeaMonkey is showing blank popup menus and folder trees 
after upgrading to macOS Big Sur [11.0]"



Has already been discussed here under "[macOs 11.0.1 big sur]: Screen 
Display Problems ❔ ⚠️️"

With your participation?!

CU

Rainer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with blank windows

[Greg Connell]

On Wednesday, November 18, 2020 at 7:36:21 AM UTC-6, t19...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi everyone! 
> I get blank pop up windows after installing the newest SeaMonkey in the 
> German version on my Mac OS 11.0.1 Any ideas?
I am using English version, same problem!!!  It makes it challenging to use 
SeaMonkey Composer to work on HTML.
I love the simple Composer. SeaMonkey please fix this issue.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Attachments - Save All or Detach All under Linux

[Nuno Silva]

On 2020-11-18, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:

> Nuno Silva wrote:
>> On 2020-11-17, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
>>
>>> I have discovered this problem which occurs on two different machines
>>> with two different versions of Seamonkey - 2.53.3 and 2.53.5 - under
>>> OpenSuse.
>>> Given a mail with multiple attachments, "Save All" or "Detach All"
>>> starts a process which takes 100% of one processor but does otherwise
>>> nothing.
>>> If I Quit Seamonkey the process remains.
>>> If I kill the process instead of Quitting Seamonkey, Seamonkey dies
>>> with the process.
>>> Saving the attachments individually works.
>>>
>>> I repeated the test on my Windows 10 machine - with 2.53.4 - and there
>>> were no problems there.
>>> Is this a Seamonkey/Linux problem or a Seamonkey/OpenSuse problem?
>>
>> Do you know which file picker is SeaMonkey using?
>>
>> What is the value of the ui.allow_platform_file_picker setting? (You can
>> check that, for example, in about:config.)
>>
>> (What is the separate process that gets started?)
>>
>
> ui.allow_platform_file_picker was set to false, that feels a bit weird.
> I have no idea what the separate process is, "top -i" simply
> identifies it as seamonkey.

And is it really a separate process, and not the original seamonkey
process? Could you please confirm this?

> ok, setting ui.allow_platform_file_picker back to the default value is
> as ugly as f*** but it works.  Thank you very muchly.
>
> I don't know why I had changed the value but it was probably either
> something I read here - and which will have applied to an older level
> - 
> or (less likely) something which applied to Firefox.

With that setting set to false, SeaMonkey uses the XUL file picker,
which I can't use with directories / when saving multiple files
(bug 1661070[1]), but I didn't see a separate process using 100% CPU
(I'll check again).

[1] http://bugzil.la/1661070

-- 
Nuno Silva
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Attachments - Save All or Detach All under Linux

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

Nuno Silva wrote:

On 2020-11-18, Nuno Silva wrote:


On 2020-11-18, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:


Nuno Silva wrote:

On 2020-11-17, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:


I have discovered this problem which occurs on two different machines
with two different versions of Seamonkey - 2.53.3 and 2.53.5 - under
OpenSuse.
Given a mail with multiple attachments, "Save All" or "Detach All"
starts a process which takes 100% of one processor but does otherwise
nothing.
If I Quit Seamonkey the process remains.
If I kill the process instead of Quitting Seamonkey, Seamonkey dies
with the process.
Saving the attachments individually works.

I repeated the test on my Windows 10 machine - with 2.53.4 - and there
were no problems there.
Is this a Seamonkey/Linux problem or a Seamonkey/OpenSuse problem?


Do you know which file picker is SeaMonkey using?

What is the value of the ui.allow_platform_file_picker setting? (You can
check that, for example, in about:config.)

(What is the separate process that gets started?)



ui.allow_platform_file_picker was set to false, that feels a bit weird.
I have no idea what the separate process is, "top -i" simply
identifies it as seamonkey.


And is it really a separate process, and not the original seamonkey
process? Could you please confirm this?


ok, setting ui.allow_platform_file_picker back to the default value is
as ugly as f*** but it works.  Thank you very muchly.

I don't know why I had changed the value but it was probably either
something I read here - and which will have applied to an older level
-
or (less likely) something which applied to Firefox.


With that setting set to false, SeaMonkey uses the XUL file picker,
which I can't use with directories / when saving multiple files
(bug 1661070[1]), but I didn't see a separate process using 100% CPU
(I'll check again).

[1] http://bugzil.la/1661070


I don't see a new, separate process, but I see the high CPU usage (in
the seamonkey process) after doing Save As on multiple Mail
attachments using the XUL file picker.

This does not happen when I try to save multiple items in the Page Info
Media tab.



It may not have been a separate process, I had assumed that it was for 
two reasons:

- Seamonkey was otherwise useable
- Quitting Seamonkey closed all its windows but left the process still 
running


To me, that meant that the real work was being carried out in a separate 
thread.  Of course, the fact that killing the 100% process nuked an 
active Seamonkey was not necessarily compatible with my theory.


--
spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [macOs 11.0.1 big sur]: Screen Display Problems ❔ ⚠️️

[Thomas Pfanne]

I tried to install the beta version: Same thing: Blank pop up and App can't 
close (only forced close). 
@ Thomas Hallgreen: I can't set any theme in composer.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [macOs 11.0.1 big sur]: Screen Display Problems ❔ ⚠️️

[Thomas Hallgren]

On 2020-11-18 14:39, Thomas Pfanne wrote:
> Thanks, I'll try that, but Sea Monkey can only be forced closed.

On 2020-11-18 15:14, Thomas Pfanne wrote:
> @ Thomas Hallgreen: I can't set any theme in composer.

As far as I can tell, if you are able to switch to the SeaMoney Modern theme
(using the View menu in the Browser or Mail window), it applies to all windows,
including the Composer, the Address Book, Preferences, etc, so they should all
work fine.

But I also see that if you have unsaved changes in the Composer when you try to
quit or restart SeaMonkey, it can produce popups that might be difficult to deal
with because they are blank, so the only option might be to force quit. But
SeaMonkey will switch to the new theme even if you force quit, fortunately.

Best regards,
Thomas H
(Sent from SeaMonkey 2.53.5 on macOS 11.0.1 Big Sur, using the SeaMonkey Modern
theme.)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Javascript

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a 
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it.  Should I install 
Javascript and if so how to get it?  Thanks.


G.Ross


Javascript (as opposed to Java) is natively supported by pretty much all 
browsers, if that site thinks you don't have it then I see two 
possibilities:

- You have turned it off (Preferences -> Advanced -> Scripts & Plugins)
- You have something like Noscript running and that has turned it off 
for you, for this site.


--
spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with blank windows

[Thomas Pfanne]

The older versions simply crashed on Big Sur.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Attachments - Save All or Detach All under Linux

[Don Spam's Reckless Son]

Nuno Silva wrote:

On 2020-11-17, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:


I have discovered this problem which occurs on two different machines
with two different versions of Seamonkey - 2.53.3 and 2.53.5 - under
OpenSuse.
Given a mail with multiple attachments, "Save All" or "Detach All"
starts a process which takes 100% of one processor but does otherwise
nothing.
If I Quit Seamonkey the process remains.
If I kill the process instead of Quitting Seamonkey, Seamonkey dies
with the process.
Saving the attachments individually works.

I repeated the test on my Windows 10 machine - with 2.53.4 - and there
were no problems there.
Is this a Seamonkey/Linux problem or a Seamonkey/OpenSuse problem?


Do you know which file picker is SeaMonkey using?

What is the value of the ui.allow_platform_file_picker setting? (You can
check that, for example, in about:config.)

(What is the separate process that gets started?)



ui.allow_platform_file_picker was set to false, that feels a bit weird.
I have no idea what the separate process is, "top -i" simply identifies 
it as seamonkey.


ok, setting ui.allow_platform_file_picker back to the default value is 
as ugly as f*** but it works.  Thank you very muchly.


I don't know why I had changed the value but it was probably either 
something I read here - and which will have applied to an older level - 
or (less likely) something which applied to Firefox.


--
spammo ergo sum, viruses courtesy of https://www.nsa.gov/malware/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey with blank windows

[Thomas Pfanne]

Hi everyone!
I get blank pop up windows after installing the newest SeaMonkey in the German 
version on my Mac OS 11.0.1 Any ideas?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [macOs 11.0.1 big sur]: Screen Display Problems ❔ ⚠️️

[Thomas Pfanne]

Thomas Hallgren schrieb am Sonntag, 15. November 2020 um 22:53:47 UTC+2:
Thanks, I'll try that, but Sea Monkey can only be forced closed.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Javascript

[G. Ross]

Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a 
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it.  Should I 
install Javascript and if so how to get it?  Thanks.


G.Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!

[Stanimir Stamenkov via support-seamonkey]

Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:03:47 +0100, /Frank-Rainer Grahl/:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:23:46 +0800, /Edmund Wong/:


[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5


Just want to get a confirmation it is likely a false positive:

Windows 10 (Windows Defender/Security) flags the installer 
(seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe) to contain "Potentially 
Unwanted Software": PUA:Win32/Caypnamer.A!ml


Are others on Windows 10 getting this?


Donwloaded again and compared with the one I did get directly from the 
build server. 100% identical. After building I installed it in several 
of my Windows 10 vms and two laptops without Windows defender making 
even a little beep. Has now been a few days ago but looks like a 
99.9% false positive.


SHA256: fb546afd5d674e69a717a2d742c7b507c585a818ce2f025637d49da917d0be0c 
*seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe


The SHA256 sum I'm getting locally is the just the same but I'm getting 
the threat flag consistently.  Anyway I'm going to ignore it.  Thanks 
for providing additional insurance for it.  Windows Defender seems very 
obscure on what and how it's doing.


--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Extension works with 2.53.5 on MacOS but not on Windows

[dstamat via support-seamonkey]

Hello Everybody,

My favourite weather forecast extension ForecastFox (fix version) v2.4.8 works 
fine with Seamonkey 2.53.5 on Macos but not the exact same version of Seamonkey 
on Windows. How can this be? Any ideas?

Thanks in advance

Dimitris
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!

[Stanimir Stamenkov via support-seamonkey]

Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:16:12 -0800, /Ant/:

On 11/18/2020 11:54 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:03:47 +0100, /Frank-Rainer Grahl/:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:23:46 +0800, /Edmund Wong/:


[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5


Just want to get a confirmation it is likely a false positive:

Windows 10 (Windows Defender/Security) flags the installer 
(seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe) to contain "Potentially 
Unwanted Software": PUA:Win32/Caypnamer.A!ml


Are others on Windows 10 getting this?


Donwloaded again and compared with the one I did get directly from 
the build server. 100% identical. After building I installed it in 
several of my Windows 10 vms and two laptops without Windows defender 
making even a little beep. Has now been a few days ago but looks like 
a 99.9% false positive.


SHA256: 
fb546afd5d674e69a717a2d742c7b507c585a818ce2f025637d49da917d0be0c 
*seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe


The SHA256 sum I'm getting locally is the just the same but I'm 
getting the threat flag consistently.  Anyway I'm going to ignore it.  
Thanks for providing additional insurance for it.  Windows Defender 
seems very obscure on what and how it's doing.


Is there a way to report its false positive since it's new and not a 
popular file? I remember when Norton did this too in the past.


Not seeing an option here:

https://i.imgur.com/gqYTGtM.png

I've been previously presented with such an option – to indicate online 
(on some Microsoft site) I'm trusting the source of a particular 
application which is unknown (and not digitally signed) to some 
Microsoft online screening service (don't remember the name but it's 
built-in to Windows).


--
Stanimir
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!

[Frank-Rainer Grahl]

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:16:12 -0800, /Ant/:

On 11/18/2020 11:54 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:03:47 +0100, /Frank-Rainer Grahl/:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:23:46 +0800, /Edmund Wong/:


[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5


Just want to get a confirmation it is likely a false positive:

Windows 10 (Windows Defender/Security) flags the installer 
(seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe) to contain "Potentially 
Unwanted Software": PUA:Win32/Caypnamer.A!ml


Are others on Windows 10 getting this?


Donwloaded again and compared with the one I did get directly from the 
build server. 100% identical. After building I installed it in several of 
my Windows 10 vms and two laptops without Windows defender making even a 
little beep. Has now been a few days ago but looks like a 99.9% false 
positive.


SHA256: fb546afd5d674e69a717a2d742c7b507c585a818ce2f025637d49da917d0be0c 
*seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe


The SHA256 sum I'm getting locally is the just the same but I'm getting the 
threat flag consistently.  Anyway I'm going to ignore it. Thanks for 
providing additional insurance for it.  Windows Defender seems very obscure 
on what and how it's doing.


Is there a way to report its false positive since it's new and not a popular 
file? I remember when Norton did this too in the past.


Not seeing an option here:

https://i.imgur.com/gqYTGtM.png

I've been previously presented with such an option – to indicate online (on 
some Microsoft site) I'm trusting the source of a particular application which 
is unknown (and not digitally signed) to some Microsoft online screening 
service (don't remember the name but it's built-in to Windows).


It says exe.part. Not sure if the rename to .exe failed when you downloaded 
the version and this is the problem you see.


FRG
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Javascript

[Ant]

On 11/18/2020 8:38 AM, Dirk Fieldhouse wrote:

On 18/11/2020 15:16, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:

G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a 
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it.  Should I 
install Javascript and if so how to get it?  Thanks.


G.Ross


Javascript (as opposed to Java) is natively supported by pretty much 
all browsers, if that site thinks you don't have it then I see two 
possibilities:

- You have turned it off (Preferences -> Advanced -> Scripts & Plugins)
- You have something like Noscript running and that has turned it off 
for you, for this site.




Or the site tests for some JS primitive that SM doesn't implement.

Or the site doesn't recognise SM and proceeds on the assumption that it 
doesn't implement the JS level that it thinks is needed.


G. Ross, what's the weather web site? Do you have its exact URL you saw 
this issue?

--
Life's so loco! ..!.. *isms, sins, hates, (d)evil, z, tiredness, my 
body, illnesses (e.g., COVID-19 & SARS-CoV-2), deaths (RIP), heat, 
interruptions, issues, conflicts, obstacles, stresses, fires, 
out(r)ages, dramas, unlucky #4, 2020, greeds, bugs (e.g., crashes & 
female mosquitoes), etc. D: Note: A fixed width font (Courier, 
Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.

   /\___/\http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
  / /\ /\ \
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.53.5 released!

[Ant]

On 11/18/2020 11:54 AM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:03:47 +0100, /Frank-Rainer Grahl/:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:23:46 +0800, /Edmund Wong/:


[1] - http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.53.5


Just want to get a confirmation it is likely a false positive:

Windows 10 (Windows Defender/Security) flags the installer 
(seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe) to contain "Potentially 
Unwanted Software": PUA:Win32/Caypnamer.A!ml


Are others on Windows 10 getting this?


Donwloaded again and compared with the one I did get directly from the 
build server. 100% identical. After building I installed it in several 
of my Windows 10 vms and two laptops without Windows defender making 
even a little beep. Has now been a few days ago but looks like a 
99.9% false positive.


SHA256: 
fb546afd5d674e69a717a2d742c7b507c585a818ce2f025637d49da917d0be0c 
*seamonkey-2.53.5.en-US.win64.installer.exe


The SHA256 sum I'm getting locally is the just the same but I'm getting 
the threat flag consistently.  Anyway I'm going to ignore it.  Thanks 
for providing additional insurance for it.  Windows Defender seems very 
obscure on what and how it's doing.


Is there a way to report its false positive since it's new and not a 
popular file? I remember when Norton did this too in the past.

--
Life's so loco! ..!.. *isms, sins, hates, (d)evil, z, tiredness, my 
body, illnesses (e.g., COVID-19 & SARS-CoV-2), deaths (RIP), heat, 
interruptions, issues, conflicts, obstacles, stresses, fires, 
out(r)ages, dramas, unlucky #4, 2020, greeds, bugs (e.g., crashes & 
female mosquitoes), etc. D: Note: A fixed width font (Courier, 
Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.

   /\___/\http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
  / /\ /\ \
 | |o   o| |   Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ /   Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
 ( )
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Javascript

[G. Ross]

Ant wrote:

On 11/18/2020 8:38 AM, Dirk Fieldhouse wrote:

On 18/11/2020 15:16, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:

G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a 
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it.  Should I 
install Javascript and if so how to get it?  Thanks.


G.Ross


Javascript (as opposed to Java) is natively supported by pretty much 
all browsers, if that site thinks you don't have it then I see two 
possibilities:

- You have turned it off (Preferences -> Advanced -> Scripts & Plugins)
- You have something like Noscript running and that has turned it off 
for you, for this site.




Or the site tests for some JS primitive that SM doesn't implement.

Or the site doesn't recognise SM and proceeds on the assumption that it 
doesn't implement the JS level that it thinks is needed.


G. Ross, what's the weather web site? Do you have its exact URL you saw
this issue?


https://www.13wmaz.com/radar

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey