Re: [Biofuel] negative ions

2007-02-23 Thread Philip Gwinnell
Dear Kirk,
 
I have no theory buy I can tell you that water does not ionize due to impact.
 
For some more information on this topic check out www.chem1.com/CQ/ionbunk.html 
The title pretty much says it all.
 
Best Regards
 
Philip
 
Philip Gwinnell
Hainan Bioenergy


Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 23:21:32 -0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]: Re: [Biofuel] negative ions
The normal Ion count in fresh country air is 2,000 to 4,000 negative Ions per 
cubic centimeter (about the size of a sugar cube). At Yosemite Falls, you'll 
experience over 100,000 negative Ions per cubic centimeter. On the other hand, 
the level is far below 100 per cubic centimeter on the Los Angeles freeways 
during rush hour.
 
http://www.negativeiongenerators.com/negativeions.html
Today all burn cases at Northeastern are immediately put in a windowless, ion 
conditioned room. In ten minutes, usually, the pain has gone. Patients are left 
in the room for 30 minutes. The treatment is repeated three times every 24 
hours. In 85 percents of the cases no pain-deadening narcotics are needed. Says 
Northeastern's Dr. Robert McGowan, Negative ions make burns dry out faster, 
heal faster and with less scarring. They also reduce the need for 
skin-grafting. They make the patient more optimistic. He sleeps better.
Encouraged by this success in burn therapy, Dr. Kornblueh, Dr. J. R. Minehart, 
Northeastern's chief surgeon, and his associate Dr. T. A. David boldly tried 
negative ions in relief of deep, postoperative pain. During an eight month test 
period they exposed 138 patients to negative ions on the first and second days 
after surgery. Dr. Kornblueh has just announced the results at a London 
congress of bioclimatologists. In 79 cases 57 percent of the total negative 
ions eliminated or drastically reduced pain. At first, says Dr. Minehart, I 
thought it was voodoo. Now I'm convinced that it's real and revolutionary.
 
http://amasci.com/emotor/kelvin.html
 
this page tells how to build a water drop high voltage generator. I get the 
impression the charge on waterfall droplets results because the environment is 
charged. The droplet charge is influenced by that. If the sky is positive and 
the earth negative the droplets would be influenced to be negative. Repulsion 
from the earth and attraction from the sky.
Whats your theory? The fact they are charged is empirical evidence. 
 
Philip Gwinnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I don't follow either. If water (or any molecule for that matter) started 
deconstructing on impact we'd be in deep shit. Maybe these people know the 
secret of cold fusion too - perhaps can it be carried out with an umbrella. 
Philip GwinnellHainan Bioenergy

 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:07:19 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 
 biofuel@sustainablelists.org Subject: Re: [Biofuel] negative ions  Ok 
 could you explain again how the pulverization of water results in  
 ionization (of a molecule?) I don't follow.  Joe  Kirk McLoren wrote:  
  December 30, 1990   NEGION.ASC  
    This 
 article is from raum  zeit (Space  Time), Vol. 1, No. 5,   1989/90, page 
 85.   Subscriptions are available for $59.00 per year in the continental 
   United States.   raum  zeit Telephone : 714-240-3775  P.O. Box 
 3370 FAX : 714-493-9759  San Clemente, California Managing Editor : 
 Chrystyne Jackson 92672 U.S.A.   
    
 Why are Negative Ions So Healthy?   Lenard (1915) found that when water 
 is atomized (e.g. on impact of a   water droplet), negative and positive 
 charges are SEPARATED.   Molecules which are torn from the surface of the 
 water bear a NEGATIVE   charge (small negative ions) whereas large drops or 
 the entire mass of   water are POSITIVE.   
 ___ Biofuel mailing list 
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org  
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html  
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/ 

Explore the seven wonders of the world Learn more! 
___Biofuel mailing [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel
 at Journey to Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


Check out the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get 
things done faster.
_
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+worldmkt=en-USform=QBRE___
Biofuel mailing list

Re: [Biofuel] Meanwhile - Biodiesel start-up hauls in $214 million

2007-02-23 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Dawie

Keith - I'm afraid I wasn't paying attention when I first encountered the allegation about catalytic converters, General Motors, Johnson-Matthey, and some then not very valuable shares in platinum mines. I think it was in the late lamented motorcycle magazine AWoL. I was half hoping you could supply some detail ...

The list archives might be able to, if not directly then you could pick up some leads to follow further. 

I've long understood the inappropriateness of using the term free market to describe corporate capitalism. 

But it's been so successful, journalists spout it with the jerk of a knee, Joe Bloggs has a high opinion of it. You'd think it means free of fascism rather than free of regulation. The advantage is that it gives us a level playing field which the big guys get to tip their way without the machine yelling Tilt.

>From a previous message:

> Whatever could be wrong with free trade? Sounds so equitable and democratic. But the winds of free trade favour the ships with the biggest sails, and sink the rest. The magic of the marketplace and the Invisible Hand don't bring the greatest benefit to the greatest number - on the contrary, in an unregulated marketplace, goods will inevitably be driven towards those with excess funds (the wealthy) and away from those with no means (the poor and needy). As we can see, worldwide.

The other side of the same coin:

In a message dated 6/23/05 2:09:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 mass poverty and hunger are the collateral damage 
of neoliberal wealth creation (read wealth extraction, poverty creation) >>

more like an essential ingredient in the process.   anywhere you find people 
impoverished and marginalized in their own land, if they aren't kept on the 
brink of survival then they'll start thinking about how to kick out the thieves 
and parasites.

... It also requires a large reserve pool of readily exploitable factory fodder, or just any kind of fodder, people who'll do virtually anything at any price to get some food for their kids and are all too aware of the hundreds or thousands waiting to take their place - they know they're the lucky ones. 

Now what was all that again about border industries? Rings bells eh Dawie? 

The suits spout about the benefits of being untrammelled, and doubtless most of them believe it. What really benefits them is a rather draconian regulatory environment with which they have an exclusive ability to comply. 

Yes. 

Surely there is the odd suit that understands that? 

Many I think. But they're operating within the context of the primacy of the bottom line, in fact required by law to give priority to the bottom line. But in human terms that's the behaviour of a psychopath. Yet the corporations - the thing itself, whatever it is, not the people who work for it - have more human rights than humans do. 

Corporations have different personalities, some are more benign than others, and maybe they tend to attract more of the odd suits as a result. Maybe there's scope for evolution in that, and maybe some of the suits also think so, especially right now, when a lot of people are waking up to a lot of things they can't ignore any longer. 

We get emails from high-placed executives in transnational corporations. They tell us of their families and their children, of their dreams, sometimes of projects they do in their spare time (gardening! - very subversive!), but the reason they write is that they want to make a difference. 

Unless we speculate that the corporate organizational structure is sufficiently complex to manifest a form of rudimentary and ruthless intelligence that does understand that - the sort of sly stupidity one associates with monsters in mythology.

I'm sure there's that too. Not necessarily stupid. 

I'm alliterating today. Oh, now I'm assonating!

:-)

But the ability to play chess is not that uncommon. If lots of people can think a few moves ahead, why not corporate strategists? 

I think any strategist can think a few moves ahead. But we all have our blindspots, and the corporate worldview has many, many of them peculiar to corporations. 

And if lots of people can second-guess other people thinking a few moves ahead ...

There are lots of signs of that happening in this context. The Internet turns out to be the great leveller of unlevel playing fields. 

We all know which are the monster corporations, the top corporate criminals year after year, no use trying to evolve or reform or rehabilitate them, they're the problem and they have to go, and so does their entire neo-liberal playing field. 

The idea that that will necessarily destroy the whole structure of world or Western or American civilisation and life-as-we-know-it with it doesn't hold a lot of water. Nobody needs the corporate criminals. 

Economics and sanity are not incompatible. Time for sane economics, methinks. 

Hey, I've got a suit. I even wore it once. Required for a job I was commissioned for. Very high-quality suit, 

Re: [Biofuel] Truth or Propaganda?

2007-02-23 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Robert

I didn't reply to this because I was a bit taken aback. Anyway I'll 
try. Lots of snips.

Good for you with your attempt to complain to Feinstein, but why work 
in a vacuum?

A lot of folks enjoyed those Oz videos about Stupid Americans but I
thought they were very depressing! None of those folks could pinpoint
Iran on a map, they thought Australia was Iran. But they wanted to
nuke it anyway. If I was an Australian that would've worried me
deeply! Ooops! Sorry!

You detect no bias in that film?

Of course!

Had they asked ME those questions, I'd have been able to answer them 
without difficulty, and I'm an American, too!  Yet it sends a 
funnier, and in some ways more sobering, message to only show the 
half-wits and characterize the rest of us as existing within the 
same intellectual framework.

But you do. There are what, 40 million of them? 60 million maybe? 
Their manufactured consent is part of the national intellectual 
framework within which these actions become possible. You're not 
represented by the fundamentalist so-called Christian right either, 
but they're a disproportionate part of setting that framework too.

No need to fool all of the people all of the time as long as you fool 
enough of them enough of the time.

Those of us who oppose the stupidity going on in my country are 
routinely shouted down by those who are perpetrating it, as well as 
their devoted minions.  The filmakers didn't show any people with 
contrasting capabilities, and that omission makes it look like the 
average American is a dolt.

What sticks about it is that a similar level of ignorance is 
displayed by prospective senior diplomats answering questions at the 
Senate who can barely finger the country they're going to be 
ambassador to on the map. The name Chester Crocker rings a bell, eg, 
IIRC, but there've been many of them. Such fiascos get wide coverage 
in the world press (high aghast value, makes good copy), and so do 
the ensuing disasters.

Anyway, that video crew knew what they were looking for and were 
confident they'd find it, as they did. Where else in the world can 
you go out on the street and be confident of finding folks with such 
a doltish world-view? Anywhere else where the per capita expenditure 
on education compares with the US? Anywhere else at all? Maybe that's 
the point. Sure, they could have found a bunch of really switched-on 
folks too, but you can find those anywhere.

You're right that it's up to us Americans to agitate for change, 
but I'm sad to say that the driving force behind my government has 
very little concern for my view as a citizen.

Yes, Robert, that's one of the things Americans are agitating to change.

Other people have been calling the Global Village the Other
Superpower for a few years now, but the Business Party mouthpiece
thinks it's an authority deficit, the end of CAWKI, aarghh, we'll all
be murdered in our beds. Well let's hope it is, CAWKI's past its
use-by date anyway.

You can shoot these guys on suspicion Robert, if it's deep suspicion
use a refined roadside bomb, LOL!

Me?  Advocate violence?

My fighting days are a dim and unpleasant memory!

That's the bit that left me nonplussed. You seriously think I meant 
that literally?

Maybe you were just feeling tender because you felt America was being 
got at. (Actually it was global corporatism that was being got at, 
but indeed Wall Street is not far from Washington.)

Robert, we're talking about a war of words. Eg.:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17148.htm
US ratchets up 'psy-ops' against Tehran
02/22/07 SaudiDebate -- Psychological warfare is fast emerging as 
the key component of the conflict between Iran and the United States. 
It is being used extensively by the latter to influence Iranian 
behavior in Iraq and secure a climbdown by the Islamic Republic in 
the intricate negotiations over the country's controversial nuclear 
program.

He calls it a War of words, but he's only looking at a part of it, 
the Middle East bit, the target.

Another part is the diplomatic (so to speak) offensive aimed at the 
UN, the EU etc, on the world stage outside the Middle East and 
outside the US.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17149.htm
US Iran intelligence 'is incorrect'
Vienna
02/22/07 Guardian -- -- Much of the intelligence on Iran's nuclear 
facilities provided to UN inspectors by US spy agencies has turned 
out to be unfounded, diplomatic sources in Vienna said today.

And so on.

The third part of the war, maybe the most important part, is the 
domestic offensive - the lying and cynical campaign of spin and 
disinfo to manufacture consent in the US for a killing war against 
Iran, which so many people have said is just a replay of the pre-Iraq 
spin and disinfo. Outside the US people have difficulty grasping the 
fact that you're actually doing the same thing all over again, it's 
beyond belief. But that's what's happening.

When you shoot known 

Re: [Biofuel] Truth or Propaganda?

2007-02-23 Thread robert and benita rabello




Keith Addison wrote:

  Hello Robert

I didn't reply to this because I was a bit taken aback. Anyway I'll 
try. Lots of snips.

Good for you with your attempt to complain to Feinstein, but why work 
in a vacuum?
  


 It's a little isolating to live "over the line." My social network
is primarily comprised of people who strenuously disagree with me.
I've never been much of an activist, preferring to be left alone, and
that reticence works against me in this realm.

(Bias in the OZ films)

  
Of course!

  
  
Had they asked ME those questions, I'd have been able to answer them 
without difficulty, and I'm an American, too!  Yet it sends a 
funnier, and in some ways more sobering, message to only show the 
half-wits and characterize the rest of us as existing within the 
same intellectual framework.

  
  
But you do. There are what, 40 million of them? 60 million maybe? 
Their manufactured consent is part of the national intellectual 
framework within which these actions become possible. You're not 
represented by the fundamentalist so-called Christian right either, 
but they're a disproportionate part of setting that framework too.
  


 Yes, I hear your point. If I'm sensitive to this, it's only
because I don't like being lumped into the same category with a bunch
of dolts!

  
No need to fool all of the people all of the time as long as you fool 
enough of them enough of the time.
  


 The lies are so pervasive, so compelling, and they're told with
such straight faces that even our journalists repeat them without
challenge. Here's an interview conducted by Robert Siegel with the
Israeli ambassador on NPR yesterday. I've inserted my comments in
parentheses.

***

Middle East
Israeli Envoy Calls for Resolve on Iran, Hamas


All
Things Considered, February 22,
2007  
Sallai Meridor recently arrived in Washington to serve as Israel's
ambassador to the United States. His tenure begins at an important
juncture: The Middle East peace process is in a multi-sided stalemate.
And the region is adjusting to the news that Iran has defied the United
Nations in enriching uranium.
Asked if
Israel  a country that many believe already has nuclear weapons of its
own  would act unilaterally if Iran persists with its development
plans, Meridor takes a different tack.
"I
think it's critical that the Iranians know that they should not be
allowed to have [a] nuclear weapon," the ambassador says, "and that all
options are on the table."
If Iran
succeeds in developing a nuclear weapon, Meridor says, "it would be a
mortal threat to the world, and the world should get their act together
to stop it now."

(insert: Where's the evidence that Iran is developing a nuclear
weapon??? And even if they were, why would that be a mortal threat to
the world?)

Robert Siegel talks with Meridor.
A transcript of the interview follows:
ROBERT
SIEGEL: The Middle East peace process, which has long been in a state
of suspended animation, is now in a kind of multisided stalemate. The
quartet, which is made up of the U.S., the European Union, the U.N. and
Russia, reminded the Palestinians last night that their government must
renounce violence, recognize Israel, and accept previous agreements and
obligations. The Palestinian Islamist group, Hamas, which won the last
parliamentary election, does not meet those requirements.

(insert: See, that last statement is accepted as a given. Hamas is
bad. There is no inclusion of the cease-fire, and NOTHING is mentioned
from the perspective of the Palestinians. The "world" is portrayed as
unified against Hamas, but that's not what I'm hearing in this forum!)

A
Palestinian government of national unity that includes Hamas that was
brokered by Saudi Arabia  and the President Mahmoud Abbas says is the
best they can possibly do  does not yet satisfy the quartet's terms.
And that is just the barrier to getting back to serious negotiations.
The issues that Israel and the Palestinians would actually negotiate
are no easier today than they were a few years ago.
Joining
us to talk about those and other issues is Sallai Meridor, who recently
arrived in Washington to serve as Israeli's ambassador to the United
States. Welcome to the program.
AMBASSADOR SALLAI MERIDOR: Thank you. And thank you for having me.
MR.
SIEGEL: First off, is there any declaration or commitment that Hamas
could say or make that would satisfy Israel that a Palestinian
government, including Hamas, could be a partner for peace, or does
Hamas being Hamas preclude that.
AMB.
MERIDOR: Well, Hamas is today a terrorist organization committed to the
destruction of the state of Israel. What it would take for us to be
able to move forward is to have a Palestinian government that
recognizes the right of Israel to exist, that renounces terrorism and
violence, and that is committed to adhering to previous 

[Biofuel] Learning from Cuba's response to peak oil

2007-02-23 Thread Kirk McLoren
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7i6roVB5MI
 
-
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] The 'fuel of the future' has arrived your gas tank From farmer's field - Woodstock Sentinel Review - 2007.02.22

2007-02-23 Thread Darryl McMahon
The 'fuel of the future' has arrived your gas tank From farmer's field
to;
Agriculture reporter Bruce Urquhart wades into the ethanol debate

Illustration: 3 photos; 1. 2 photos courtesy by Metro Creative Graphics;
GOLDEN; Farmers in Oxford County could benefit from the biofuel boom.
Plants are being
erected in Aylmer, and Tillsonburg.; 2. graphic by Bruce Urquhart
When Henry Ford unveiled his mass-produced Model
T in 1908, it was designed to run on a mixture of
gasoline and ethanol, a blend that, at the time, he
called the fuel of the future.
While Ford likely thought this future a little more
immediate, his prediction could prove true almost a
century later. A surge of interest in the environment,
coupled with mounting government attention to
alternative fuels, has given ethanol and other biofuels
a new legitimacy.
Both the provincial and federal governments have
committed millions of dollars to supporting a national
policy on renewable fuels, making ethanol, biodiesel
and their counterparts a solid plank of their
environmental initiatives. The Harper government
recently confirmed its intention to require 5 per cent
average renewable content in Canadian gasoline and
diesel fuel, such as ethanol and biodiesel, by 2010,
providing $345 million for capital incentives and new
research and development.
With the Conservative government's commitment,
ethanol production is expected to triple in the next
three years, peaking at over 650 million litres by
2010. When the Harper government announces the
federal budget on March 19, many economists are
expecting even more incentives for biofuel
production.
Community co-ops (for ethanol) need development
money, said Berry Murray, the CEO of the Canadian
Sweet Potato Ethanol Alliance, which is building a
$140-million plant in Tillsonburg. We need money
for business plan development, feasibility studies and
operating grants.
There's a lot to do yet in Canada, but they are
announcing a lot of programs. We're hoping they're
getting the message (because) there's a tremendous
potential for the agricultural community ... for
localized energy production.
The Canadian government's initiatives are actually
surpassed by ongoing efforts south of the border. In
his Jan. 23 State of the Union address, U.S. President
George W. Bush outlined an ambitious plan to reduce
his nation's dependence on foreign oil by requiring
the production of roughly 134 trillion litres a year of
renewable and alternative fuels by 2017, a fivefold
increase of the target set by the American Congress
in its 2005 Energy Policy Act.
Ethanol is an example of what I'm talking about,
Bush said in a 2006 exchange. And ethanol is good
for drivers. Ethanol is homegrown. Ethanol will
replace gasoline consumption.
With corn-distilled ethanol currently the most
popular and readily available biofuel, and the North
American demand set to eclipse supply, these
government initiatives will have a profound impact
on the continent's agricultural sector. While Canadian
growers have struggled with low corn prices in recent
years, the keen interest in ethanol, together with the
existing infrastructure for the corn-distilled fuel,
should augur a parallel increase in the commodity's
value.
But corn isn't the only crop that could be impacted by
the government's ethanol intoxication. Because
ethanol can be derived from the starch or sugar in a
number of ordinary crops, including wheat, straw and
sweet potatoes, the true impact of the biofuel
escalation on North American growers is impossible
to quantify.
For rural Ontario, including Oxford County, this keen
interest could mean hundreds of jobs and, according
to the Canadian Renewable Fuels Association, a
market for at least an additional 50-million bushels of
corn every year. With the new ethanol plants slated
for Tillsonburg and Aylmer, Oxford County farmers
seem well situated to benefit from this biofuel boom.
For the Tillsonburg plant, the alliance is actually
viewing ethanol production as a complement to crop
production, using the fuel to underwrite its foray into
the sweet potato market. By using sweet potato waste
as one of its feedstocks, the alliance hopes to offer
the actual crop at a price competitive with the
expensive imports from the southern U.S.
If we have a facility that can take the waste for a
value-added return, we can help price the sweet
potatoes competitively, Murray said. We can use
the waste revenues to make sure that's a competitive
model ... and help facilitate the growth of the sweet
potato industry. If we can help grow that industry,
there is a potential of high earnings for local
farmers.
While the future seems bright for the growers and
processors involved with the burgeoning ethanol
industry, this particular fuel does have its detractors.
Some critics doubt the broader environmental
benefits of ethanol while others disparage its
economic viability. There are also those who fear the
growing demand for corn and similar biological
materials could 

[Biofuel] Chrétien takes heat over Kyoto - Globe Mail - 2007.02.23

2007-02-23 Thread Darryl McMahon
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070223.LIBSKYOTO23/TPStory/

Chrétien takes heat over Kyoto
Former PM was not ready to meet targets when Canada signed on, adviser says
BILL CURRY

With a report from Bloomberg

OTTAWA -- Former prime minister Jean Chrétien committed Canada to the 
Kyoto Protocol fully expecting to fall short of the targets, the man who 
served as his trusted policy adviser says.

Eddie Goldenberg made the surprising comments in a London, Ont., speech 
yesterday as the House of Commons is deadlocked over whether it is too 
late for Canada to meet its 2012 emission-reduction targets.

The remarks also come as an Alberta oil official revealed what he said 
is the Conservative government's plan for reducing emissions from the 
oil industry. Rather than absolute reductions, Suncor Energy spokesman 
John Rogers said, companies may be required to reduce the amount of 
annual carbon emissions by 2 per cent for each barrel of oil produced. 
Failing to do so would trigger a penalty of 25 cents a barrel, he said, 
citing conversations with federal officials.

Earlier this week, a report from environmentalists at the Pembina 
Institute said the oil sands could comply with Kyoto's targets by adding 
between 58 cents and $1.18 (U.S.) to the production cost of each barrel 
of oil.

Environment Minister John Baird said final decisions have not been made 
as to the government's climate-change regulations for industry, which he 
has promised to release before the end of March.

He said Mr. Goldenberg's remarks confirm the Conservatives' criticism of 
the previous government.

We always knew that the Liberals had no plan, they took no action and 
had little intention of doing so, he said.

According to speaking notes provided to The Globe, Mr. Goldenberg told 
the Canadian Club yesterday that the Liberal government was not ready to 
take the difficult measures necessary to comply with Kyoto.

I am not sure that Canadian public opinion -- which was overwhelmingly 
in favour of ratifying Kyoto in the abstract -- was then immediately 
ready for some of the concrete implementation measures that governments 
would have to take to address the issue of climate change, Mr. 
Goldenberg said. Nor was the government itself even ready at the time 
with what had to be done. The Kyoto targets were extremely ambitious and 
it was very possible that short-term deadlines would at the end of the 
day have to be extended.

Mr. Goldenberg said the simple act of signing the protocol was 
beneficial in the long run because it galvanized public opinion in 
favour of action on climate change.

Canada signed the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 and committed to reducing 
greenhouse-gas emissions to 6 per cent below 1990 levels in 2008 to 
2012. Emissions are now more than 30 per cent above that target.

Liberal environment critic David McGuinty said he was personally 
involved in crafting plans to help Ottawa meet Kyoto's targets as head 
of the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy, a federal 
advisory body.

I'm very surprised to hear this from Mr. Goldenberg, he said. The 
Liberal MP noted that Mr. Goldenberg is now an Ottawa lobbyist for 
clients such as TransCanada Pipelines, which supports a MacKenzie Valley 
pipeline to transport oil from Alaska to Alberta. Mr. McGuinty said he 
was simply stating that Mr. Goldbenberg should explain why he is now 
making these comments.


Darryl's comment:
OK, now that we know who to blame for the record, could we now move on 
to trying to improve the situation?




-- 
Darryl McMahon
It's your planet.  If you won't look after it, who will?

The Emperor's New Hydrogen Economy (now in print and eBook)
http://www.econogics.com/TENHE/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] UK Consumers' revolt: Power to the people

2007-02-23 Thread Darryl McMahon
This from a friend, and I though sufficiently encouraging that it is 
worth passing along.
Darryl

 Original Message 

http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article2296848.ece


Consumers' revolt: Power to the people




Consumer militancy erupts as individuals join
forces on the internet to fight back against the state and big business




Published: 23 February 2007

Banks

A mass revolt has left the high street banks
facing thousands of claims from customers seeking
to claw back some of the £4.75bn levied annually
on charges for overdrafts and bounced cheques.
More than one million forms demanding refunds
have been downloaded from a number of consumer
websites. The banks are settling out of court, often paying £1,000 a time.

Utilities

While average gas and electricity bills
approached £1,000 last year, a record 4 million
householders have dumped their supplier after an
internet-led consumer campaign. British Gas
admitted yesterday it lost 1.1m customers in just
12 months, and two weeks ago slashed gas bills by
17 per cent and electricity bills by 11 per cent.
Other big suppliers, Powergen and npower, are expected to follow suit.

Road pricing

Plans for road pricing have faced massive public
opposition spearheaded by an internet campaign.
In just three months 1.8 million people have
signed an online petition, linked to a new
section of the Downing Street website, launched
by a disgruntled motorist from Telford.

Supermarkets

 From Devon to Inverness, planning applications
for superstores are being thwarted by residents'
campaigns orchestrated on the internet. Tesco
scrapped a superstore plan in Darlington last
year following opposition and this week residents
sank a Tesco plan for a £130m retail development
in Tolworth, Surrey. Friends of the Earth is
co-ordinating the protests across the country.

Air travel

Green travellers are boycotting air travel
because of climate change. Campaigners have
staged sit-ins at airports while hundreds of
people have signed up to an online pledge set up
by a veteran environmental campaigner. An
estimated 3 per cent of people have stopped
flying to help the environment, while 10 per cent are cutting back 
onflights.

Packaging

A campaign launched by The Independent urging
supermarkets to reduce excessive packaging has
prompted a remarkable response. Supermarkets have
had to defend their practices after thousands of
readers emailed examples of environmentally
damaging packaging. The campaign gained
widespread public support - a day of action is
planned later this year - and has been backed in
an early day motion in the House of Commons.

Football tickets

Football fans fed up with paying £50 a time to
watch games have joined forces online to put
pressure on clubs to slash prices. Manchester
City fans led a boycott of the club's match at
Wigan in protest at the cost of tickets. Chelsea
have announced a freeze on most ticket prices
next year and Bolton promised a 10 per cent cut.

Post Offices

Government proposals to axe 2,500 post offices
has prompted an organised revolt from pensioners
and consumer groups across Britain. The
Federation of Subpostmasters and a number of
other organisations have launched online
petitions opposing the plan, and a rally was
staged in London on Tuesday to increase the
pressure on the Government to save the post offices from closure.





-- 
Darryl McMahon
It's your planet.  If you won't look after it, who will?

The Emperor's New Hydrogen Economy (now in print and eBook)
http://www.econogics.com/TENHE/

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Meanwhile - Biodiesel start-up hauls in $214 million

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Katie
i have a novel buried under my bed somewhere. it is one of those 
cyber-apocalypse, computers destroy the world type things written just before 
2000. it didnt really state anything useful, or even really that entertaining 
(thus it is buried under the bed) except there was one passage where the main 
characters were playing with acronyms and they came to the conclusion that gods 
(in the corporate case, demons) DO in fact exist, but only as a collections of 
minds- similar to a computer network- that create a large, intangible, 
intelligent, background program (deity). also described in the form of the 
previously mentioned computer themed acronym as a G.O.D. or group overmind 
daemon. Take away the minds and the overall conciousness begins to fade.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Keith Addison 
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:32 PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Meanwhile - Biodiesel start-up hauls in $214 million




Unless we speculate that the corporate organizational structure is 
sufficiently complex to manifest a form of rudimentary and ruthless 
intelligence that does understand that - the sort of sly stupidity one 
associates with monsters in mythology.


  I'm sure there's that too. Not necessarily stupid. No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.431 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/699 - Release Date: 2/23/2007 1:26 
PM
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] FIU to Study Alternative Ethanol Technology

2007-02-23 Thread AltEnergyNetwork

FIU to Study Alternative Ethanol Technology 

http://www.alternate-energy.net/N/news.php?detail=n1172284041.news







Get your daily alternative energy news

Alternate Energy Resource Network
1000+ news sources-resources
  updated daily

http://www.alternate-energy.net



Next_Generation_Grid

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid/


Alternative_Energy_Politics

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics


Tomorrow-energy

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy


Earth_Rescue_International

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Earth_Rescue_International

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Truth or Propaganda?

2007-02-23 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Robert

Keith Addison wrote:

Hello Robert

I didn't reply to this because I was a bit taken aback. Anyway I'll 
try. Lots of snips.

Good for you with your attempt to complain to Feinstein, but why 
work in a vacuum?

   It's a little isolating to live over the line.

I know. It happened to me when I was 23 and a little blue-eyed boy in 
the eyes of my family and so on because of my stellar progress up the 
rungs of the journalism career ladder, but then I went and altogether 
blew it by chucking aside a great job on a national paper and joined 
a black paper instead. Then it all changed, they always knew there 
was something basically unsound about Keith... It was never 
discussed, an unmentionable. When I was with them (where I wasn't 
quite a pariah, immediate family and a few others) I had to pretend 
it just didn't exist, and, very considerately I'm sure they thought, 
so did they. Polite, you know. So the gap grew, as there was more and 
more I didn't and couldn't talk about. Though I was ever more deeply 
involved in them, it was not possible to discuss any of the huge 
issues challenging life in South Africa with anyone in my family or 
any of the people I grew up with. That never changed, even though 
South Africa did, bringing what you'd've thought would be 
vindication. But then, it just occurred to me that they'd probably 
have behaved exactly the same way if I'd turned out to be gay.

Not the only such example, and not only with those people.

Never did like ladders. Ever noticed how the higher you go the 
narrower the rungs get?

Maybe with that bit of background you can understand why I think it's 
kind of useless to complain to senators and so on. Er, excuse me Mr 
Vorster... LOL! Not much different anywhere else, just a matter of 
degree. There was no such thing as a peace network, nor even a left 
wing, they were all in jail, in exile or dead, or living secret lives 
and very bothered about the spies among us. The so-called left wing 
was a right of centre party backed by Anglo American. All a little 
isolating, yes.

My social network is primarily comprised of people who strenuously 
disagree with me.

At least they still talk to you.

I've never been much of an activist, preferring to be left alone, 
and that reticence works against me in this realm.

So why do you confine yourself to that realm? In fact you don't, or 
you wouldn't be here.

Here's a bit you snipped from the previous:

The propaganda machine is SO well oiled and widespread it's 
becoming nearly impossible to find truth in news reporting . . . 
That's one reason I find this forum so valuable.

Yes, me too!

Do any of the peace networks have local branches in your area Robert?

Are you put off? If so, why? Actually all the peace networks have 
local branches in your area, right there in the computer you're 
staring at right now. Just like this forum.

Don't you think they might have been able to offer a more effective 
approach than just calling Senator Feinstein, perhaps one that 
coordinated with other efforts? Or maybe some specific information on 
how to get through to Feinstein or someone like her instead of 
getting a brush-off? These groups do have such resources within their 
sphere of interest, just as this one does within our sphere.

(Bias in the OZ films)

Of course!

Had they asked ME those questions, I'd have been able to answer 
them without difficulty, and I'm an American, too!  Yet it sends a 
funnier, and in some ways more sobering, message to only show the 
half-wits and characterize the rest of us as existing within the 
same intellectual framework.

But you do. There are what, 40 million of them? 60 million maybe? 
Their manufactured consent is part of the national intellectual 
framework within which these actions become possible. You're not 
represented by the fundamentalist so-called Christian right either, 
but they're a disproportionate part of setting that framework too.

   Yes, I hear your point.  If I'm sensitive to this, it's only 
because I don't like being lumped into the same category with a 
bunch of dolts!

We're all in the same lifeboat.

No need to fool all of the people all of the time as long as you 
fool enough of them enough of the time.

   The lies are so pervasive,

How did it get to be that way, do you think it just suddenly happened?

so compelling, and they're told with such straight faces that even 
our journalists repeat them without challenge.

Not even other journalists, primarily other journalists.

Here's an interview conducted by Robert Siegel with the Israeli 
ambassador on NPR yesterday.  I've inserted my comments in 
parentheses.

I've snipped it, but yes, quite! The usual story. But not the only 
story around.

snip

   Now I believe that NPR represents the pinnacle of journalism in 
the United States,

The pinnacle of journalism. Where would one look for the pinnacle of 
journalism these days? In the mainstream media? Actually you do find 
examples of 

[Biofuel] Pasteurised raw milk?

2007-02-23 Thread Keith Addison
Seems your organic raw milk might be pasteurised anyway.

http://www.strausfamilycreamery.com/?id=34
Pasteurization

:-(

Francis Pottenger, where are you when we need you?

Best

Keith

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Pasteurised raw milk?

2007-02-23 Thread Kirk McLoren
If the system has touched it it is denatured and toxic.
  Meat is worse. It is injected with so much solution that pan frying a burger 
results in boiled meat.
  Also I dont feel well the next day. Our homegrown beef does not do this and 
isnt toxic.
  You can feel and taste the difference.
   
  Kirk

Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Seems your organic raw milk might be pasteurised anyway.

http://www.strausfamilycreamery.com/?id=34
Pasteurization

:-(

Francis Pottenger, where are you when we need you?

Best

Keith

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



 
-
TV dinner still cooling?
Check out Tonight's Picks on Yahoo! TV.___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/